ASTONISHING New Information About the Human DNA (Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson)

Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson has uncovered some incredible new information about humanity’s DNA. Simon Turpin interviews Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson about his new book Traced.
What happened to the ancient Egyptians? The Persians? The Romans? The Mayans? Are we their descendants? Recent genetic research uncovered surprising links between us and the peoples of old-links that rewrite race, ethnicity and human history.
More about Nathaniel:
answersingenes...
More about Simon:
answersingenes...
To support the work of Answers in Genesis UK/Europe:
answersingenes...

[@lindacook8819]

In the end times, knowledge will increase. Thank you

[@jleelacey]

Is it just me, or does the audio keep skipping?

[@regsun7947]

Not just you--between it and the fellow's halting speech I'm giving up on it.

[@didibrant7326]

You will find this same problem on some other Christian ministries' videos. Whoever is interfering, they are afraid of any truth being revealed. Have you noticed that in just a few months time, Google has changed how you can get the closed captioning twice. If you get irritated by the sound, turn it off, press the 3 little dots, and you can choose closed captioning.

[@nathanandnickSherbetImage]

Yes

[@truthserum9157]

@Didi Brant - yea I have, I also get lots of static on my phone when I’m talking about new biblical discovery’s.

[@10solidrocks]

The audio is constantly skipping

[@robertslimm9319]

From Canada, may God bless all His people.

[@matthewwithum8372]

Wish the audio was better, wealth of great info.

[@stevenrogers9123]

I have watched this whole series from start to finish over the past 2 days. I found it very fascinating.

[@robertslimm9319]

This is absolutely amazing research. Eye-opening. May God open people's eyes to the Truth

[@juditheamador2491]

God bless you for this information! You prove what God says in his word!

[@raymondschlichting6778]

I have ordered the book and look forward to future information.

[@answersingenesis]

Hi Raymond! Thank you! For more information you can check out this website: answersingenesis.org/genetics/supplemental-material-traced/ We hope you enjoy!

[@vincentpinto1127]

Audio and video skips. If there is a long, detailed video planned, AiG, please host it out of the US, or update the server capacity of the UK platform to support hiccup-less flow of the video. Even the resolution of the video, though allowing for 720p, is NOT actually 720p clarity. Looks like some autocompression loss is going on somewhere.

[@frazierclan2000]

The limitations of study of the Y chromosome is that it is only the "primogeniture" line. Some people may be primarily descendent of one group, but because they were conquered and the conquer's genetics spread around, when you look at only the primogeniture lineage, the rest disappears. Hopefully some day research will lead to better genetic tests.

[@aaronchambers9888]

These famous olmec heads from Mexico are fascinating because not only are the extremely ancient and geographically far removed from the "old world" but they are likely the oldest detailed representations of human faces on earth. The Egyptians seem to have stylised their statues in the older period than evolved more into making realistic representations of themselves but still not as realistic as the olmec heads. The Greeks probably didn't start doing it until 400 bc or so. The most famous olmec head definately bears what look like African features compared to modern Africans but it has something else as well thats different. other heads actually look Mongolian and there's one that looks European, like an old southern European ,almost ectrusian or Roman, but you can't quite pin any one of the heads down to a particular people group we have now . All the "races" seem inextricably mixed together in these faces. It definately bears studying out.

[@kitmckeraghan8735]

Watching from Council, North Carolina, USA. VERY INTERESTING!

[@mooredelira]

The sound is popping and cutting out as you are rapidly talking

[@QuixoteX]

Tip: if you are recording a stream also have the speaker record on their end. Then you can go back and edit in better footage.

[@roselucht4583]

Watching from Southern Nevada

[@tecora7419]

Every time I read comments I am astonished how rude , mean & disrespectful people have become 🤔

[@lele8874ify]

It's the black hebrew israelites...m some try and sat scythians were black lol

[@wanttopreach]

You are the rude one as the respondents are actually comminicsting and if we could get together we would probably go out to eat! Yours is the liberal democrat response that stole our republic!

[@yvonnesmith7981]

I haven't even read the last book on the subject, but already have a new book to get!

[@texasgulfgal1005]

Amazing information!

[@ericc155]

The video and sound are so degraded that it is hard to understand. Not impossible. Just hard. Either it is user error, streaming issue, or other?

[@wanttopreach]

yah but the advertisements are clear!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🙃

[@kathleenw5788]

Very interesting ,thanks from Oregon

[@NepticFathers]

Is the timeline aligned with the Masoretic text only or does it also look at the Septugiant or Dead Sea Scrolls? I've heard there are discrepancies with the dates depending on what textual tradition you use.

[@answersingenesis]

For more information, check out this site: answersingenesis.org/genetics/supplemental-material-traced/ Thanks!

[@mikemccracken5073]

No offense... don't be surprised if Ken's Genesis lineage timelines are challenged (a little) by this very research (Septuagint): we are all desiring the truth... especially among brethren.

[@user-kw1bu3kp5k]

We have been working on the timelines between the MT and Septuagint. As far as we’ve studied to date, just under 1,400 years off. We also study the DSS. We are still working on this. Blessings

[@NepticFathers]

@@user-kw1bu3kp5k Thanks for the reply. It would also be interesting to see what sections of the genealogy gets stretched as well, and if all of the Septuagint texts have the same timeline.

[@danglesener308]

Sadly, the video and audio are quite choppy both on KZbin and Fb.

[@dennisloren1568]

Watching from Dearborn, Michigan, USA

[@mariakelawan2518]

Trinidad and tobago is in the house.great job keep it up😊☺

[@qinoqino7643]

PRAISE GOD JESUS CHRIST, I love it when GOD JESUS CHRIST proves arrogant people wrong

[@bradrichards8122]

Please PLEASE repost with the audio fixed. It's very distracting.

[@mikebeck2484]

Very interesting perspective! Pertaining to genetic mutation affecting health and disease, have you considered the effect that increasing environmental toxins have on epigenetic modification of gene read-out, and possible resulting downstream changes/adaptations in offspring genetics?

[@djo3704]

Dr. Nathaniel, i have watch "Mysteries of the Ancient Pacific...". I think u limit urself to Indonesia as modern Indonesia. People u mention to have similarity with Papuan Nugini people are Melanesian ppl too. They have lighter skin bcz theres so many mix with other ethnicity and race. Many of us are mix European, Arabs, Jews, Japan, Portuguese, etc. I'm one of them. Our land have been occupied from time to time by so many different nations, now Indonesia. If u look deeper, u'll find our dark history with these nations. In Papua Island there are Papua & Papua Nugini. Papua now included to Indonesia. Another Melanesian islands in Indonesia are Maluku & Nusa Tenggara Timur. We have completely different ancestors & culture than other of Indonesian ppl.

[@Earman]

Go beyond "race." There is one Genome with chromosomal variants (0.001%) because of protein expression. We are all from a much smaller family than you were told to believe, by evolutionary ideologues.

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

@@Earman Evolution isn't an idolaligy. It's a Scientific Theory firmly rooted in the Scientific Method and fully supported by 20 other fields of science you ignoramus

[@critical-thought]

One key data point that MUST be resolved is the generational mutation rate for each line.

[@stephenmentze1579]

I would love his take on monoliths who/how they were built and sites like gobekli tepe.

[@jeannemariebooth1121]

Compelling content made difficult to receive by audio corruption.

[@cathyw7067]

Why is he cutting out? It makes it painful to listen too. Lol I love his teaching!!!

[@TKO67]

agreed. I hope they can clean up the audio and re upload the video again !!!!

[@donmiller316]

It appears that the connection from the US to the UK was bad. If you make it to the end where the host begins the live interview you see the host streaming perfectly, but Dr. Jeanson is still "cutting out". Since the recording was made on the UK side there will be no way to clean it up. AIG should record a new presentation and post it in place of this. I spent time restarting my browser and computer thinking it was on my end. Eventually I looked in the comments and found months old remarks about the poor quality stream.

[@eugenevdwalt7067]

There is a problem with the sound, it breaks up...

[@jason1911]

There was quite a bit of slaves that were taken from Africa to the Arab world up to and even after the American slave trade ended.

[@chrisanderson5317]

Arabs in Sudan are still kidnapping Africans and selling them into slavery. Also, I failed to mention the other places Africans are enslaving their brethren in the present day. Congo, Sierra Leone, Northern Nigeria, and Mauretania all have significant problems with human trafficking, which is just slavery under a more polite term.

[@wanttopreach]

Yah, but most immergrated here voluntarily. I know a black lady who went to where her family came from in Africa on mission and when she returned she said " THANK GOD FOR SLAVE SHIPS"!!!!!

[@smokeysmith1282]

Not sure if I’ll ever fully comprehend all of this exciting information☹️☹️☹️

[@zeph99]

An interesting thought is that if a man has only daughters it's equivalent to extinction of his line

[@NilodeRoock]

Now, please(!) explain this all in correlation and aligned with the major archeological finds.

[@qinoqino7643]

Theres alot of noise, skipping, focus in and out, stopping in this video, it's madding

[@craigtaylor115]

Excellent

[@bobpegram8042]

In South Africa, when the Dutch settled in the early 1500s there were no "Black" people. They migrated south much later. The only inhabitants of the South African area when the Dutch landed were the Bushmen who are lighter, but still African. Neither the Xhosa people (like Mandela, Tutu, etc.) nor the Zulus (much taller and darker and the population majority in South Africa) were there. There are many indications that the Nigerians were the earlier Egyptians at the time of the pyramids.

[@Lindel60]

Everyone skirts around the true origin of E1b1a. Were the Nigerians early Egyptians or early Israelites now that genetics has killed the myth/lie that E1b1a was always in West and Central Africa.

[@BillGreenAZ]

It makes sense that there were no "black" people in South Africa when the Dutch settles as the indigenous people of the area were far from the equator and must have been lighter in skin color.

[@shaneamundson1192]

The western half of South Africa and Namibia were nearly devoid of people when the Dutch arrived beacuse it is a desert and requires more advanced farming and irrgation to sustain life. The Bushmen were hunters and gatherers and the Bantus (ancestors of murderous commie Nelson Mandela) hadn't yet invaded South Africa.

[@brandoncarlson1304]

As a native American I would need to see more evidence from the America's...

[@mommadeb49]

I have heard that so far there is not enough natives who have given dna samples yet to get clear pictures.

[@SnakeJones09]

Yeah man. Americas is the key to the Truth of who we are. I'd bet everything the Americas are the True origins of man.

[@cynthia3216]

I am interested in this study but I am reticent in giving my DNA for public use. I think a lot of Native Americans feel the same way.

[@Earman]

I'm native American too . . . an 1/8 Cherokee. This study is saying AmerIndians arrived no earlier than 200-300 AD . . . that they replaced another generation of people who were before them . . .to be revealed later.

[@joelgarcia6287]

Dr. Jeanson, what are the DNA tests you’d recommend for men wanting to learn about their ancestry?

[@answersingenesis]

We recommend using these forms: www.answersingenesis.org/go/traced/ www.answersingenesis.org/go/traced/

[@VenturaIT]

India has 14.2% Muslim people. "How did Muslims take over India? Islam came to India in the 10th century when the Ghaznavids, a Turkic tribe, annexed the area now known as Punjab. By 1200, Muslim warlords had conquered much of northern India, and by 1206 had founded the Delhi Sultanate with its capital at Delhi.Sep 19, 2002 Soul of India: Timeline | Wide Angle - PBS"

[@bobpegram8042]

Did the atmosphere before the flood block harmful solar radiation? If, so that could also explain the drastic drop in lifespan.

[@williambacker6581]

where is the link to participate in Y chromosomes data?

[@bluefire10169]

People are beautiful, we are all one regardless of skin tone

[@BillGreenAZ]

No we are not. There are quite a few differences between the races. Races have different shaped heads, noses, skin color, eyes, every imaginable difference in appearance. It's absurd to think the rest of the characteristics of humans are the same between races.

[@AmericanJobsFactory]

What about DNA from frozen samples in artic ice or something?

[@NepticFathers]

I would also assume this could be used to see if the tree lines up with major death events like the bubonic plague.

[@celeste5607]

Based on the Y-HG you are saying the Jews with the J Haplogroup are not from Shem but from Japheth? So that is saying the Jews from Europe are actually converts and they do not have a direct line to Jacob. Jacob is from Shem's line.

[@Its.A.Me.Mario.1985]

Khazars converted. Look into it.

[@wanttopreach]

What you said her ia True. The modern Jew came from a people group from what is now eastern turkey, iraq, Iran area. The king guided them to convert to Judeaism then when the Muslims attacked they left the area in mass and went to Germany/ Poland. This does not mean they are not jews because Jew is a religion, They are NOT Hebrews The Hebrews that are blood Hebrew were force converted to Muslim in the 1920s, the other choice was DIE! Did you know that Moses' first wife was a Ethiopian black quean?!!

[@johnlord8337]

The information of video 28:00 shows that the incoming refugee populations of all those people of the East coming into the Mideast and the collapsing Roman Empire, that a vast source of people in that (corrected) 450-600s CE period came in and moved into those regions of the Mideast and Mozabite (Mozambique) and Bedouins. They are not the native population - but became the new population "increase" that is not accounted for - and shows that this DNA lineage is located elsewhere earlier than 450s CE (back into China and India (and some Persian populations) moving westward. In this one can't make generic qualifications of every 3 generations there is some click in the DNA, and we can click them all back together, but you CANT make them located in the area in which you are conducting DNA tests of 2000 CE - sheer illogic of a statement.

[@wanttopreach]

So most of what you are saying is real howeve you end statement is bad. The modern Jew came from a people group from what is now eastern turkey, iraq, Iran area. The king guided them to convert to Judeaism Then when the Muslims attacked they left the area in mass and went to Germany/ Poland. This does not mean they are not jews because Jew is a religion, They are NOT Hebrews The Hebrews that are blood Hebrew were force converted to Muslim in the 1920s, the other choice was DIE! Did you know that Moses' first wife was a Ethiopian black quean?!!

[@johnlord8337]

It is also known that (1) Either Joktan or (2) Peleg was re-located by the Elohim after the Flood, and the Tower of Babel. It is highly suspicious that the names of the sons and himself would be be known Central and South American locations. Joktan of Yucatan (!), Havilah the region of South America that would become the Gold of Ophir (Peru) and his descendant genealogies mentioned in Genesis. As to the whole Jewry Ashkenazi of the Central Arab Republics, and such Kazakhstan (Cossacks) nationally converting from Christianity to becoming Jewry in between the warring Byzantine Christian Empire and the Islamic Empire, what is not said, is that these people were of the biblical tribe of Judah, leaving from Jerusalem pre-69/70 CE and Roman conquest, into a northward and southward direction. The Christians fled down to Petra and had the first Christian Reich (69-570/600 CE) when they were taken down by the rising Islamic wave of religion. Others moved up and into the Anatolian and Central Arab Republics. Such Jewry and converted Jewry would be pushed out into Russia, Poland, Eastern Europe of the Byzantines, greater Germania, and others into the western catholic nations. Such as we have the Ashkenazi of Judaic bloodlines from the start, irrespective of being religious or secular Jewry.

[@iamthenotbenamed365]

Greetings! could it be Animals (including HU-MAN) change depending on Changing-Circumstances at the Specific-Lock-at-ION ...

[@0animalproductworld558]

I sent answers in genesis a very nice email and I got a repsonse from Nathaniel (: Very very very nice!

[@bobpegram8042]

Interesting that the Indian chief you show (Geronimo?, Sitting Bull?) has blue eyes.

[@alexandersushko6211]

To the distributor of this. Please take off this presentation and fix the problem, and please publish. Thanks

[@paulbuckles5353]

Unfortunately recorded with a bad connection. For credibility sake, a rerecording would be most respectful to those who wish to consider the presentation as something worth listening to

[@silverbackhayabusa]

We could have asked the ancients to leave us a perfect historical record which would made many of our efforts to investigate the past much easier and more convincing. However, sometimes life happens and busy people only have some many resources to dedicate. Going back and redoing this video is one of several options for the good Dr. to consider investing his time in. Maybe he's placed a higher priority on expanding his work rather than reworking a video that provides plenty of solid information though perhaps not ideally. The quality has nothing to do with credibility for any fair-minded individual and perhaps it would be most respectful to the man who made it if you simply thanked him for providing his research to you free of charge. Plenty of men of his pedigree would charge you for this kind of information.

[@thomasressler]

Genetic entropy may more clearly answer the final question. See the book and website of the same name for details.

[@bobbyg8949]

please get better mics that crackling messes with me while im watching throwing me off

[@Max-kn9yi]

Is this part 1 6 3? Which?.........

[@cynthia3216]

I think this is 1 of 4. It would have been nice to label these for us to watch in sequence 🙂

[@chrisjones-rd8it]

i think you should say sub Saharan Africa and northern Africa to prevent confusion

[@internetboogeyman2744]

Your creating confusion now with you made up terms

[@joashmaneipuri2758]

What do you think of the "Global Patterns of Linkage Disequilibrium at the CD4 Locus and Modern Human Origins." An article published by the AAAS in 1996.

[@domeniclocalzo9498]

❤ it.

[@edmundrussell6044]

I would like to point one thing out to everyone that watched this video. Notice that his genetic marker chart starts off with names (Ham, Shem and Japheth) and not genetic markers. There is a reason it doesn't. When you change those names to genetic markers. There is only one way the chart can be arranged. CT produced CF (Japheth) which produced C and F. F produced G,H,I,J,K. K produced L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,L and T.

[@Lindel60]

Yes, I totally agree. He is making Japheth dwell in the tents of Shem which is fulfilling biblical prophecy. This is also supporting the old Christian lie that all Africans are the sons of Ham. Your analogy is correct. Africans are both Ham and Shem. The deception continues. He did a great job with ancient America and Egypt but this area of research has many questionable holes. Geneticists and anthropologists tell part truth because they have to please their sponsors. Take a look at who his sponsors is?

[@johnlord8337]

​@@Lindel60 With biblical and historical accuracy one must look to the Abrahamic family. Abraham and Sarah had Isaac and the start of the Israelites, while Hagar spawned the Mideast Ishmaelites (for a small number of centuries). It is the second family of Abraham (Keturah) whose sons were sent to India and became the (a)Brahmins upper caste, and they held to their god of Abram/Brahma and Suri (Sarai) whereas they should have had Keturah (!). Those lineages were in the 1500s BCE and lived down to the 1300s BCE when the majority wanted to return to the Mideast from India. These were Hebrews. Many intermarried with the former upper caste and lower caste (enslaved - captured AUS/NZ aborigines) in which you then had Hebrew-Indian and Hebrew-blacks (the real Black Hebrews). This portion of population would attempt colonization back in the Mideast (Persia and Saudi) and were rebuffed. They then went to Nubia/Kush at the time of the Egypt/Nubian wars (of General Tut-Moses (1240s BCE) and were given shelter if they would fight for Nubia and become citizens of the land. Nubia lost many wars to the Egyptians, But these Keturan Black Hebrews and Hebrew-Indians would be in this area. At the Exodus (1207/1206 BCE) those said "mixed populations" also exited Nubia and Egypt and went into the northern Saudi (Midyan) and Jordanian (Petra) land around current day Eilat (Israel) and Aqaba (Jordan). It is known that the capitol of the Nubians was called Napata ... and has never (until now) been connected with such population of people at Petra wrongfully attributed to Arabs as these were those same Black Hebrews and other Nubians of Napata - known as the Nabateans. So there are comments of Out of Africa, and DNA genealogists say the black left Africa to elsewhere and such AUS/NZ aborigines were from Africa. They get scoffed and told, we were here from eternity, and only left from here. This is all part of the further out-migrations of Nubians/Kushites/Black Hebrews INTO central Africa and that of Mali and Timbuktu etc. The real Africans are real Black Hebrews (and AUS/NZ) of which all other branches on that continent descend. Making all Africans of Ham, Cush (Kush), Nimrod being black is a vast mis-statement of fact. Just as much as the recent black wave of historians with black pharaohs, black Greeks, black Romans, and now the attempt to make Cleopatra of Macedonian Greek ancestry out of the Zara-ite exodus from the Nile Delta East Bank of Goshen 150 years before the Exodus (1357/1356 BCE - Manetho Greek-Egyptian historian). Even the name Aegypt is only from the period of the 1620s-1295, 1292 BCE period of the Sea Peoples occupation of the Nile Delta, and then recovered by the native Tutmose/Amenhotep and Ramesides down to the Exodus.

[@Lindel60]

@@johnlord8337 yes. All Africans are not Ham and the Levant is really North East Africa where Haplogroup E according to some geneticists began. The Levant was taken out of African geography to conceal the truth. But you know these white Christian theologians can’t get let the curse of Ham go. It’s killing them to even admit that ancient Egypt was really black and that the true modern Egyptian descendants are mulauttos. And it’s even harder for them to admit that E1b1a didn’t originate in west Africa and that it traveled from the holy land through Egypt to west, central, and South Africa!

[@johnlord8337]

@@Lindel60 If there is truth then Ham was white or brown, not black - and the curse of Ham, just like the curse of Cain was said to be this racism - then Ham, Cush, Nimrod were all white, brown, Mideastern olive skin - and its just a matter of semantics of who is who - and who is really cursed - and if any of that bloodline truly even exists today - like the Ismaelites who died out within ~500 years of Ishmael ! All of these comments re-enlivening these 70 nations and someone of only 600 people tested has the narrowest of direct male ancestry that can only be guess-timated to be of the same biblical descent (just because they happen to be located in the same area - is sheer hubris !). Then I am a native American because my father's ancestry goes back to Robert the Bruce of known Scottish Norman lineage to Norway - while my mother is pure Norwegian and they both connect back into Norway and that traces back into Asgarde (East Garden) of Turkey/Anatolia/Mideast of the Royal Judaics. Yet I live in America, was born here - but I can now claim to be the Tribe of Hooby Jooby DNA because I live here. Absolute tripe.

[@johnlord8337]

@@Lindel60 Also taking North Africans who are Spanish, Portuguese, Libyans, etc, they were also Phoenicians, then Sea Peoples, Romans, Visigoths of North Africa, "Arab" tribes from the Mideast, etc etc etc. So one can't take and make generic statements that they were there from the time of Noah and the Flood until now. An entire rewrite of the whole DNA markers needs to have corrected migrations accounted.

[@Midgard458]

The audio clicks and skips

[@garym7989]

Simon PLEASE, PLEASE slow down, as I can not hear everything you're saying. You talk too fast. Cadence is too fast. Please? You have great info, and I want to hear everything.

[@Peter_McKenna587]

Adjust the playback speed in your settings.

[@Earman]

It's a lot of data . . .he has several more videos . . .a whole series.

[@dove5591]

The Macedonians are not Greeks not even in the Holy Bible.

[@dove5591]

@@kgmail7364 The Macedonians are not Greeks and Macedonia is not Greece in the Holy Bible: Acts 20:1-2 King James Version (KJV) 20 And after the uproar was ceased, Paul called unto him the disciples, and embraced them, and departed for to go into Macedonia. 2 And when he had gone over those parts, and had given them much exhortation, he came into Greece, Acts 27:2 King James Version (KJV) 2 And entering into a ship of Adramyttium, we launched, meaning to sail by the coasts of Asia; one Aristarchus, a Macedonian of Thessalonica, being with us.

[@douglaidlaw740]

@Dove: The Macedonians were a separate kingdom, but ethnically, they were Greeks. The world of Alexander the Great spoke the koine language, derived from Attic, the Greek of Athens.

[@soweseringmodousowe2719]

Egypt history 100%African people history ❤❤

[@waeleldanbouky6920]

no it is not , it is Egyptian and has nothing to do with you

[@wanttopreach]

Yes, as they are in Africa!!!!!!!!!! Did you know that Moses' first wife was a Ethiopian black quean?!!

[@waeleldanbouky6920]

@@wanttopreach rubbish , She was a Bedouin from Saina and Africa is neither a race nor a country , Egyptian history is for us Egyptians ,, be proud of your history and stop claiming our Egyptian history , though i know you cant stand who and what you are

[@SumYungMan]

The audio is horrible… As much as I want to watch this, I can’t do it… Driving me crazy.

[@TheNortonio]

Thought it was my internet...

[@victorylittleking]

You have to think outside the box and include every possible scenario and then eliminate the possibilities that are dead ends then scrutinize the remaining. You can then come to the conclusion and make a logical choice for the true origin of the beginning of man kind. Olmec Maya are the most ancient people on earth.

[@ibelieveitcauseiseentit9630]

You can also just research the historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus, and research the prophesies about him. Then realize that he is in fact who he claimed to be, and then realize that both he and his apostles affirmed the old testament. And then realize that Moses knew what he was talking about when he wrote the book of Genesis as he was empowered by the holy spirit to write it down. Case closed, the Bible got it right.

[@wanttopreach]

NO they ARE NOT Even their oral histery says they have been here no earlier then 500 AD.

[@paulaparker6587]

God changed number of years of life for man from 900 to 120 years because he became discouraged and frustrated with man who would not listen and was very disobedient and so he said he was not going to strive with man any longer for 900 years, he would shorten their lifespan to 120 years. Shortening their lifespan ends his time with them on earth a lot sooner than he had originally anticipated; in other words we got on his nerves.

[@wjc252006]

Is there a specific company you recommend. I already did ancestry that you said do not focus on this.

[@craigtaylor115]

Yes I want DNAtest

[@cel1945]

What about my YB-v1108?

[@LanghamW1]

Bad sound, the 'here' pointer is too often missing, the script lacks clarity. Waste of time!

[@johnlord8337]

Even testing for the claim of pure Mayan ancestry is also a misnomer as the Spanish overlords are the current over-population across Central America, with other imported African slaves, .... And the Mayans are (even now) the totally put down under population of the peoples of Central America. It is also the collapse of Mayan civilization in 1200 CE, that the North American Aztecs (Azt-tecs, Azt peoples) came and created the southern Aztec empire (1200-1513 CE) of the Spanish conquest. So even North American Aztecs (Sadduccees, Tzaddoks, Hebrews, Israelites) are within the Central American population of indigenous peoples.

[@0animalproductworld558]

God is blessing this church 🐁 he will turn it into a beautiful school 🍀 brtter than an ivy league 🦤

[@mooshei8165]

How bout Hmong and Mien

[@MichelleReidArtintheWords]

You talk about death affecting DNA and that it changes it. So, if someone living dies for an hour does that change the DNA or is there a time frame for the death to affect the blood once a death happens? I ask because I died for over an hour and less than 1 percent of the population of the world has this happen. So, if I get one a DNA test would it be correct with the happening?

[@jimtomczak7374]

I think you mean far less than 1% of the world dies for an hour and then comes back to life. Hardly anyone has had that happen to them.

[@johnlord8337]

The biblical Flood was ~1987 BCE, biblical chronology being used with validated multi-national interlocking histories and the patriarchal dated ages.

[@CR-yd4qe]

1987 the lands dried out quick?

[@johnlord8337]

@@CR-yd4qe if you have a massive worldwide upwelling and overturning of the atmosphere, winds, blowing the land dry ... remember it was only 40 days and nights of rain, but nearly a year + when they finally dislodged from "the ark" With no upper heavens waters, direct sunlight hitting the new land surface, heating up the soil, windblown scirroccos drying the soil, all the water running into the oceans lifting up sea level from the suspect continental slope border of the continental shelf up to modern sea level, then yes, all this would allow drying the higher lands, while the delta and estuary lands and swamps would now be the new normal of wetlands.

[@wanttopreach]

So Paul says you can not use family tree to prove anything except you are human. If you use the Rev . Usher timeline you are disobeying Jesus!

[@johnlord8337]

This is the real biblical supported timeline. Anglican (English catholic) Bishop James Ussher did make an honest attempt to date Creation, but in the end only further muddied up the whole attempt. 3443 BCE is the start of the Adamites on the planet - with corrected dates and timeline information - and many religious lies interwoven into the biblical story. With current DNA studies, it is proven that there are some descendants today with portions of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA. This can only happen with Adamites marrying pre-Adamite descendants. In the same consideration is that Cain slaying his brother Abel was banished eastward to the Land of Nod (India). He could only intermarry with the pre-Adamites there (!). His Cainite genealogies are shown in this time period of the pre-Flood period. How the Gospel applies to the pre-Adamites, and only the process of the Cross provided salvation for the Adamites, one is then challenged on many fronts of what really is salvation, and did HA YESHUA CHRISTOS die also for any pre-Adamite (pure ?) descendants of his time, and later ? !!!! The implications are tantamount to vast expositions of religion and history. You have aborigine AUS/NZ who say they have been there (and they were !) since the most-ancient of times. This means they are a pre-Adamite race. Many of the other races of the Old World also imply their (pre-Adamite) status. Almost all of the native and indigenous population of American tribes claiming to be here before the Flood, and potentially back before the end of the Ice Age (12,800s BCE), hiding out in caves for a massive (super)nova explosion that impacted a cosmic shockwave across the planet, and a plasma tsunami that scorched and devastated the planet from China, Mideast, Sahara Oasis turned Sahara Desert, and the multiple North, Central, and South American desert regions. People crawled out of underground civilizations. We could still have pre-Adamites living amongst us ...

[@mindanalyzer8302]

I am a christian with no background in biology, history, genetics or theology Having said that, I would like to believe this, but imo it does not explain the vast differences in physical appearance between Asians, Africans, middle easterns, Scandinavians, Australian aborigines and Native Americans. is 4500 years enough to create these differences due to living in different environments? It doesn’t seem to be the case, because we havent changed much in the last 2000 years or instead, all the different races originated from a common race, with Adam as the origin, after some manipulation by God and his angels at the tower of Babel and then all these races dispersed all over the world? That would make more sense to me … ps: Much of God’s kingdom and creation cannot be explained by our science, since our science is limited

[@quickattackfilms7923]

Not a biologist either. But if you look at how quickly people’s physical appearance changes through reproduction, I don’t see how this is a problem. Like you can have a person from Africa reproduce with a European person… then if their child grows up and reproduces with another European person. Their child will basically be blond haired, blue eyes despite their grandfather being African. Like it doesn’t take that long to differ wildly from our ancestors.

[@masada2828]

It’s the interbreeding within the same Tribe that produces the characteristics. All Tribes had an original Father as there is only one Race. The Father of the Chinese is Sinim (with their specific characteristics), a son of Canaan, grandson of Ham. All the different colours and characteristics of the peoples of the earth were within the original DNA of our first parents. Dr Jason Lisle gives a good lecture on Genetics.

[@noobsaibot5285]

Short answer; Yes. One of the most recently inhabited Islands is New Zealand. How long do you they have been there? around 1,350AD while the English arrived in 1769. In that short time period, they established a distinct culture, language, nation and now we are flying around the sky. What about african tribes with blue eyes? Also, inbreeding is an anomoly for evolutionists. The Bible says genetics is degrading, hence the instruction to not to have relations with family members.

[@theelizabethan1]

Did you have classes in General Science or Social Studies ?? Those fields touch on these topics -- at least that used to be the case in public education....

[@truckdriver8416]

He has a question-and-answer video and was asked which is more accurate the Septuagint or the masoretic? He claimed the masoretic was slightly more accurate which is completely not true. It's obvious that he did his initial research with the masoretic and he's trying to save face. The masoretic claims that Shem was still alive at the time that Abraham was alive that is impossible. Furthermore the next ten generations of Shem we're also altered concluding that the masoretic is highly inaccurate. You're welcome

[@johnmcdonald4553]

Assertions make lousy arguments.

[@truckdriver8416]

@@johnmcdonald4553 your comment is that of a self-proclaimed Pope of a church of one and your pride and arrogance blind you

[@johnmcdonald4553]

Yeah, okay.

[@johnmcdonald4553]

@@truckdriver8416 Ad-hominem attacks are even lousier.

[@Earman]

Present your case to him. I've heard something similar about the ages not being correct- but now I can revisit it.

[@qinoqino7643]

Make a video movie about this, I retain much better seeing, Doctor please

[@VaxtorT]

I have a question concerning Neanderthals. On a podcast by Thinkerthunker....he allegedly provided evidence that the Body Proportions of Neanderthals matched that of an ape and not of a human. You have determined that Neanderthals DNA designates them to be fully human. I suspect that You are both correct......but I cannot help but wonder if Neanderthals were a human hybrid? Perhaps hearkening back to Genesis 6?

[@edmundsim6251]

Noah's three sons are actually triples and there are evidences that Ham's sons are white and brown colors in the early days.

[@3pierre91]

Very bad quality audio

[@puddenlipscomb7512]

I would like DNA information on the Saami Indigenous Peoples. I believe they were some of the early people who came to America in the 1200 to 1400s. Has traced looked into these Indigenous Peoples?

[@ronysmith1]

Bad audio

[@chickenwityamz]

Why ignore Americas? That’s a disservice to us

[@Earman]

He's on it.

[@masada2828]

Civilisation began in Mesopotamia, it was migration that settled the American continent. He’s concentrating on the beginnings.

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

@@masada2828 The being was in southern Africa. Hard to argue with personal opinions against the verifiable scientific evidence

[@Mr11justin11]

America's a continent. and they do deal with it on different lessons

[@BlondeBeard18]

Same people! Same story!! 1:04:12

[@joarmstrong6520]

Jo from texas

[@noobsaibot5285]

Dr Geneson

[@TigeyPuss1]

Geneson? Yep! It's in his DNA.😊

[@delmarsimpson25]

There is only one race the human race..perhaps the construct of races is racist..grouping ppl by color. Who came up with the idea of races anyway

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

Here's a question for Dr. Jeanson. Using your theory of the origins of humanity, explain why human males have mammary glands and nipples. While you're at it, you might add all primates to that because they too have mammary glands and nipples.

[@bradrichards8122]

Wierd focus.

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

@@bradrichards8122 Lots of things about nature are "weird". Naked mole rats, for instance. or Ichneumon wasps. Believe me, there are thousands more examples. I picked a pretty easy one. All I want is to hear an intelligent design theorist explain something that doesn't seem that intelligent. I think it's fair to ask of intelligent design the same sort of questions the intelligent design theorists ask of evolution. Science is the search for an understanding of reality. You do that by asking questions, then looking for answers. If you don't want questions asked, then you aren't promoting science, you're promoting religion. My opinion is you are allowed to promote religion, just don't pretend it's science.

[@stillraven9415]

Because male and female are of the same kind! The difference is that males have a Y chromosome, and females have X. All the hardwired differences between male and females are because of that one chromosome.

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

@@stillraven9415 But you're forgetting that Adam was created before Eve (according to the creation story). Why would an intelligent designer give non-functional mammary glands and nipples to Adam, when he was never intended to suckle children? That doesn't make any sense from an "intelligent design" point of view. It does make sense if you think of a very early organism that had both male and female atributes. Some of those exist to this day. If the division between the sexes didn't take place until after the mammary glands and nipples were in place, that would explain why males have them. And in fact, that is true. Sexual differentiation in human embryos doesn't take place until about 6 weeks after fertilization. The mammary glands and nipples are formed before sexual differentiation takes place.

[@stillraven9415]

@@throckmortensnivel2850 all animals were created b4 man the system was worked out days b4. God didn't think "I never thought about that. Now what do I do?" God knows the end from the beginning. He created time! The huge amount of prophecy in the Bible that came about just as he said proves it.

[@trudymaenza9672]

I watch on phone on UTube

[@trudymaenza9672]

I live in Southern Oregon

[@doreenlaird6289]

Arizona

[@johnlord8337]

There are no pure Egyptians as they have been overlaid with so many Assyrians, Babylonians, Kushites, (Kushite Nabateans of Petra), Heberews, Israelites, (Egyptians), Persians, ancient Greeks, Romans, Alexandrian Macedonian Greeks, ... invasive refugee populations of the many Varangians, Slavs, Jutes, Angles, Saxons, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Kothari, of China and India etc.

[@VenturaIT]

What about this? "King Tut DNA more European than Egyptian: geneticists Author of the article:Reuters Published Aug 01, 2011 • 1 minute read LONDON - Up to 70% of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said. Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III, based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel. ..."

[@bluefire10169]

DNA degrades over time. It is impossible to get an accurate dna result. Science has improved since 2011. This where is it in 2023.

[@VenturaIT]

@@bluefire10169 Scientists know that and more than on DNA study was able to get viable DNA.

[@bluefire10169]

@@VenturaIT degraded dna could read wrongly

[@bluefire10169]

@@VenturaIT I don’t think you even know what “viable” means in a scientific sense. They extracted dna, yes…does it mean the dna read accurately, No.

[@VenturaIT]

@@bluefire10169 Yes I understand, viable would mean that all of the above is accounted for. Otherwise it's not a viable study and would not get published. Since many different groups of scientists have successfully extracted the DNA (accurately) then I would say it's a valid interpretation. Scientists have even extracted and successfully sequenced DNA from a 1.2 million year old Mammoth... so an Egyptian mummy is not really out of the realm of possibility. "Mammoth molars yield the oldest DNA ever sequenced 1.2-million-year-old DNA from Siberia smashes previous record, reveals new mammoth lineage" - Science

[@MyRoBeRtBaKeR]

So, with this information and ability to rewind the origins of all the people groups does this not show how everyone that ever lived originate from Adam? So, we have to go by the man's Y chromosome, so wouldn't that lead back to Adam, one man? This as well comes to mind, evolutionists say we can be traced down to fish or even primates, can we not prove that it's impossible to trace our DNA to any other animal?

[@jonathanseibel.]

Hi Christian, since the DNA-diversity or DNA-differences are the clue for answering the question "where is our common ancestor", there could be no way to go to Adam by using Y-Chromosome-DNA. It should stop at Noah as a bottleneck of male ancentory. But if you go for mitochondrial DNA (which is the same but for the female ancestory), you could probably go up to Eva, since the three woman of Noahs sons were not from the same mother. Thats how I understand the issue.

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

@Σά ββας Adam, God and Noah are fictional characters of religious mythology

[@eriknorman7409]

@Σά ββας But it says after cane killed Abel he went off into a distant land with other people! who were those people they didn't come from Adam-and-Eve???

[@eriknorman7409]

@Σά ββας So you don't have a answer? That's what I thought!!! like any person that reads The Bible, that's the one thing no preacher or any church Catholic, protestant, Baptist can never give an answer for.🤔

[@eriknorman7409]

@Σά ββας No, I believe Jesus Christ died from my sins, but I don't believe in one human race! I believe there has to be an Adam-and-Eve of every race and color....

[@douglasevans4789]

There is a major flaw (it takes all hands on deck)or a majority of the people

[@TigeyPuss1]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 What is the major flaw?

[@TigeyPuss1]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 I'd like an example of what you consider a creationism tale. You haven't substantiated your claims. What you've said so far is just opinion and nothing grounded in fact. Here's what I mean. I could copy your tactic by saying, "The whole theory of evolution is flawed. There are hundreds of evolutionary tales and zero evidence supporting them. Complete lack of evidence is a major flaw." Professional evolutionists admit that the entire edifice of the theory is based on "just so" stories. Shouldn't you cite specific "tales" rather than make a shotgun approach? Broad brushing creationism by stating unsupported opinions is unproductive.

[@TigeyPuss1]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 Although you claimed what I said was an outright lie when I said evolutionists often remark that they use just-so stories to bolster the supposed fact of evolution. The following remarks are by well-known evolutionists who have referred to evolutionary explanations as “just-so stories”. Here are 3 evolutionists who have made this remark: Stephen Jay Gould wrote, “Our technical literature contains many facile verbal arguments-little more than plausible ‘just-so stories.’” p. 144, _Bully for Brontosaurus_ In the paragraphs following this quote, Gould described how proto-wings evolved into fully evolved ones, and then he said: “There I go again-doing what I just criticized. I have presented *a plausible story* about thermoregulation as the original function of organs that later evolved into wings But science is tested evidence, not tall tales.” [my emphasis] Gould obviously wanted to give an example of a “just-so story” since evolutionists don’t like to think they are guilty of such concoctions. I think it was a superb example, making it easy to recognize the myriads of “just-so stories” in evolutionary literature. Atheist geneticist Richard Lewontin expressed the logical outcome of materialistic naturalism this way: “Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. “It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.” Richard Lewontin, "Billions and billions of demons" (review of _The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark_ by Carl Sagan, 1997), The New York Review, p. 31, 9 Jan 1997. Lewis Wolpert, a high-profile evolutionary paleoanthropologist, said, “The key evolutionary idea related to our minds is that of adaptiveness; that is those behaviours, thoughts and beliefs that help us humans to survive better. Genes can determine variants in such processes and evolution will select those individuals that survive best, and will so select those genes. The problem is to identify just what those characteristics are and how genes affect them, and to distinguish them from those that arise from interaction with the environment and learning. Alas, much of the evolutionary biology that I will use is similar to Kipling's 'Just So' stories, like how the camel got its hump. It is very difficult to get reliable evidence to show whether one is right or wrong. One cannot go back in time, but I hope that this book, like Kipling's, is both interesting and entertaining.” Lewis Wolpert, _Six impossible things before breakfast: The evolutionary origins of belief_ , p. xi, Faber and Faber, London, 2007.

[@TigeyPuss1]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 I have read all of what I sent you. I noticed you had nothing to say about my remarks on paraconformities. Are you going to try to explain the huge time gaps in the geological column? Did you even read it? We can get into a thorough discussion of the fossil record and the claims of evolutionary theory, but I'd like you to respond to my remarks on paraconformities first as an act of good faith on your part. I don't think you are sincere or really interested in a discussion of science.

[@TigeyPuss1]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 Stephen Jay Gould wrote, “Our technical literature contains many facile verbal arguments-little more than plausible ‘just-so stories.’” p. 144, Bully for Brontosaurus In the paragraphs following this quote, Gould described how proto-wings evolved into fully evolved ones, and then he said: “There I go again-doing what I just criticized. I have presented a plausible story about thermoregulation as the original function of organs that later evolved into wings But science is tested evidence, not tall tales.” [my emphasis] Gould obviously wanted to give an example of a “just-so story” since evolutionists don’t like to think they are guilty of such concoctions. I think it was a superb example, making it easy to recognize the myriads of “just-so stories” in evolutionary literature. Atheist geneticist Richard Lewontin expressed the logical outcome of materialistic naturalism this way: “Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. “It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.” Richard Lewontin, "Billions and billions of demons" (review of The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl Sagan, 1997), The New York Review, p. 31, 9 Jan 1997. Lewis Wolpert, a high-profile evolutionary paleoanthropologist, said, “The key evolutionary idea related to our minds is that of adaptiveness; that is those behaviours, thoughts and beliefs that help us humans to survive better. Genes can determine variants in such processes and evolution will select those individuals that survive best, and will so select those genes. The problem is to identify just what those characteristics are and how genes affect them, and to distinguish them from those that arise from interaction with the environment and learning. Alas, much of the evolutionary biology that I will use is similar to Kipling's 'Just So' stories, like how the camel got its hump. It is very difficult to get reliable evidence to show whether one is right or wrong. One cannot go back in time, but I hope that this book, like Kipling's, is both interesting and entertaining.” Lewis Wolpert, Six impossible things before breakfast: The evolutionary origins of belief , p. xi, Faber and Faber, London, 2007.

[@jrbush1]

I've got the book

[@jasonwiley798]

38:30 oops you admitted they are all legends.