Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle | Roger W. Garrison

[@AbadllahDeBourgogne]

Sounds effect are rather loud and annoying and the sound quality is not great but the global presentation is a masterstroke at keynesian fallacies. Thanks for publishing it.

[@doppeldeluxe]

Oh my God! A group of Americans who know the difference between "Austria" and "Australia".... ;-)

[@NietzscheanMan]

After having viewed it with more attention, I feel compelled to say that Mr. (doctor, professor?) Garrison has done a truly excellent (I repeat: excellent) job on explaining the ABCT in a concise and comprehensive manner. The powerpoint presentation is available online if you google it (as is just about any libertarian educational work) and with removal of the noises I will be sure to bring it up in discussions with non-economists to explain these concepts better than I used to do before this.

[@residentzombie]

After listening to Peter Schiff, Tom Woods, Bob Murphy, and Marc Faber all other Austrian economists are dull and boring. Nice to know a handful of college professors teach and believe Mises over Keynes across the country.

[@jamesbancroft2467]

I wonder what Austrian economics using explicit models, mathematicization and empiricism would look like-oh yeah... Hayek & this guy!

[@reapfreak]

Holy moly! An Austrian not wearing a bowtie!

[@jrtnews]

Very informative!

[@gibbo675]

@NietzscheanMan You are quite right, Mr Garrison should ditch the silly noises and get Mr Hat back on the scene!

[@panpiper]

@AarontheCurious Sounds are good, but volume should be controlled. They should be subtle, not dominant.

[@d4n4nable]

this is brilliant!

[@evilsceptic]

Am I the only one who thinks the sound effects are awesome?

[@superhoga]

Does Dr Garrison work the Smuckers commercials as a side hustle?

[@NietzscheanMan]

Really nice talk, but the sounds are a tad annoying after a while so I suggest leaving them out after the first slide or something :) Still, very nice talk, of course.

[@zsylvana]

1)Karen Vaughn’s Austrian Economics in America.Cambridge,1994 “Mises never discusses the possibility of systematic speculative error except in the context of his trade cycle theory,in which speculators-investors are misled by improper monetary signals emanating from a fractional reserve banking...,if the future is created out of the actions of the past,why is it not least conceivably possible for speculative activity to be on net incorrect at least some of the time?" Vaughn:87-88)

[@LibertyJedi]

Wow Really good, thank you. Excellent!

[@NicosMind]

Ive said it a couple of times but Mises needs to get another mike for the audience so we can hear it. Or the speaker should repeat the question to let the speakers mike pick it up.

[@Roedor12]

Espectacular

[@PsycoMonkey360]

yes.

[@prashantpawar]

"If only Hayek had PowerPoint, he could have shown how the abstract triangle aligns with the real-world output." But the question is, would he use those annoying sound effects?

[@samuils]

The information is good but I am giving it thumbs up for the horrible annoying irritating childish sound effects

[@samuils]

Aww ,did I hurt your feelings? Sure give me thumbs down, I really dont care. there is a guy above, second comment down who is complaining about sound effects as well, you should definitely berate him about that as well, show him whats what. :P

[@joshsoule8455]

"credited" if we are allowed to use that word

[@jebremocampo9194]

I'm a simple guy, I see Miss I click

[@BMWI-gk9wh]

What you watching Ross

[@ezzjames]

Ross

[@mtanousable]

Hey! Bowties are cool.

[@fritoman182]

Geithner disliked this

[@Audiofalcon7]

What fucking sound effects?