2022 Volkswagen Polo [1.0 TSI 95] TOP SPEED AUTOBAHN DRIVE POV

FICHE TECHNIQUE VOLKSWAGEN POLO 1.0 TSI 95 ANNÉE 2022
INFOS
Marque: Volkswagen
Catégorie: Citadine
Carburant: Essence
Modèle: Polo
Année: 2022
Prix Polo 1.0 TSI 95: 18855 €
MECANIQUE
Cylindrée: 1.0L 3cyl. inj. directe turbo
Puissance: 95 ch / 70 kW à 5500 tr/min
Boite de vitesse : Manuelle 5 rapports
Transmission: Avant
Couple: 175 Nm à 1600 tr/min
PERFORMANCES
Vitesse max: 187 km/h
Accélération (0 à 60km): 5.11s
Accélération (0 à 100km): 10.08s
Accélération (80 à 120km): 7.55s
CONSOMMATION
Réservoir :40 L
Consommation urbaine :5.9 L/100 km
Consommation autoroute :6.3 L/100 km
Autonomie :610 km
DIMENSIONS/POIDS
Poids à: 1179 kg
Volume du coffre: 351/1125 Litres
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TECHNICAL DETAILS VOLKSWAGEN POLO 1.0 TSI 95 YEAR 2022
INFO
Brand: Volkswagen
Category: City car
Fuel: Petrol
Model: Polo
Year: 2022
Price Polo 1.0 TSI 95: 18855 €
MECHANICAL
Displacement: 1.0L 3cyl. injection direct turbo
Power: 95 hp / 70 kW at 5500 rpm
Gearbox: 5-speed manual
Transmission: Front
Torque: 175 Nm at 1600 rpm
PERFORMANCE
Top speed: 187 km/h
Acceleration (0-60km): 5.11s
Acceleration (0 -100km): 10.08s
Acceleration (80-120km): 7.55s
CONSUMPTION
Tank: 40L
Urban fuel consumption: 5.9 L/100 km
Highway fuel consumption: 6.3 L/100 km
Range: 610 km
DIMENSIONS/WEIGHT
Weight at: 1179 kg
Trunk volume: 351 Liters

[@autoparis7012]

Cette caisse est top 🤙. Je l'avais loué 1 semaine pour mon job et se conduit parfaitement bien pour les trajets du quotidien. 95 cv pour une vitesse de pointe à 200 km/h retenue 187 c'est pas mal.

[@bobby____456]

questo motore è perfetto ai bassi regimi e in autostrada. Ad una velocitá di 100km/h si dovrebbe trovare all'incira tra i 2000 e 2500 giri proprio dove questo motore ha la massima efficienza e coppia e quindi riesce a spararti anche i 25 km/l. Io ho la versione da 115cv per avere un po piu coppia a velocitá piu basse ed è perfetto nei consumi. Nessuno capisce questi piccoli tre cilindri turbo che sono piu efficienti di un motore diesel di grosse dimensioni. È inutile anche portarli sopra i 5000giri perche non sono proprio creati allo scopo. Fanno invidia a qualunque turbo diesel di pari potenza perche hanno davvero una coppia eccellente ai bassi giri.

[@thebestgtasanandreas43]

Not bad for 95hp. Love the gloves 😁

[@autofastmag]

Thanks man 👍🏾

[@thebestgtasanandreas43]

@@autofastmag 👍🏻

[@claudedjawoye6345]

Le chauffeur accelere comme une tortue...

[@Raphael_le_avec]

Jai toujours aimer les polo pour moi c'est des golf en plus petit et moins cher surtout maintenant l'arrière j'ai eu du mal a me habituer mais maintenant j'aime bien 200 kmh pour 95ch c'est vraiment pas mal ditout Volkswagen on toujours été fort en vitesse de pointe Super vidéo !!!!

[@autofastmag]

Merci mec ça fait plaisir 😁👌🏾

[@MrBEAR55100]

191km/h=118mph is quite respectable for a combination between 95bhp 1.0-litres motor and DSG transmission. Good mechanical efficiency.

[@lucasmocci982]

Salut ! Monter dans les tours trop souvent n'endommage pas la voiture ?

[@bmwans4679]

Très belle vidéo. Bonne voiture en générale. Consommation raisonnable. Moins de 6l/100 en mixte. Entre 5.5 et 6 sur autoroute Moteur suffisant. Voiture spacieuse pour la catégorie. Agréable a conduire que ce soit sur petite route ou si grand trajet. Elle est bonne partout. Sauf en conduite sportive ou la sonorité du moteur est désagréable dans les tours.

[@autofastmag]

Merci à toi 👍🏾

[@Sergio-nh3vo]

Est ce qu'elle est conseillées pour les routes de montagne, en Corse par exemple?

[@Sergey.SU.69]

Отличный обзор !!!

[@autofastmag]

Спасибо за ваш комментарий 😊👌🏾

[@bernarddemortain7459]

Les premières polo 6, 95 sans fap, allaient à 204 lors d’un essai semblable sur KZbin il y a 4 ans mais en réalité d’après la presse spécialisée elle avaient 100,5 cv sous le capot .

[@rafaor2920]

I’m not sure that you remember but how it’s noise isolation?

[@marcdubois5006]

Pas trop mal pour un 95 cv je trouve. Superbe vidéo

[@autofastmag]

Merci 😁👌🏾

[@marcdubois5006]

@@autofastmag avec plaisir

...so the fifth gear does not produce any power past 4000 rpm?

[@pieterbotha560]

I have the 2018 Polo 1.0 Tsi MT. I can confirm that after 4k rpm in 5th there's not much left...But still, running 190km/h on a 1.0 motor with only 5 gears is not bad at all, even compared to some 4 cylinder 2l motors...I did stage 1 tune and removed CAT. Now i get to 5k rpm and 201kmph on GPS. Car is running at least 500rpm's lower in all gears compared to before the tune.

@@pieterbotha560 Thanks for the reply! I've recently gotten my Polo 2022 Life 95hp with DSG, can confirm - there is nothing the engine can really do after 3500rpm except for hot panting, but holy crap does it want to go places at 2500-3500.

[@dankyrii4427]

would you recommend it to a novice driver?

[@autofastmag]

It's suitable for everyone and behaves perfectly in the city.

[@yordi3945]

You have to be careful though because you make mistakes little room for error because of negative horsepower

[@yordi3945]

Plus, much less efficient when wanting to go to another place in a not highway quickly. Because you either go a bit faster in higher revs and catch up with the ongoing traffic, or be efficient and slow down the whole traffic

[@BrateTebra123]

Which rides better, this or the Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 100hp?

[@DrunkNeltey]

This. The 1.2 puretech is not reliable at all

[@BrateTebra123]

@@DrunkNeltey I said ride, not reliable

[@adriangonzalez6696]

@@BrateTebra123 I think the Peugeot is Faster and It has more torque than this VW

[@BrateTebra123]

@@adriangonzalez6696 I just got my 208 1.2 Puretech 100 after driving Polo 1.0TSI 95. The difference is notible, 208 is punchier and on open road it uses same fuel as the 1.0 TSI. However in town it uses a bit more as its start stop is not as efficient and it is a slightly bigger engine. However it runs smoother and it is puchier then 1.0 TSI. My vote goes for 1.2 Puretech with no doubt. Reliability is one thing I can not measure though. Both engines served me with no issues so far

[@sixta74]

@@BrateTebra123 Thanks, i'm struggling rn. hesitating between a Polo 1.0 TSI 95hp and 1.2 Puretech 208 The estethic cannot be compared, too much different and i like pretty much both. Polo has more space. On the both I selected they are at same price (18.000) the biggest downside is: Polo is automatic and from 2019 instead of 2021 for 208. I've been looking everywhere to compare it and can't choose one.

[@nirhawk]

i jealous

[@autofastmag]

Why??

[@tristanyoung1247]

ok just ok

[@muhammetakdeniz3429]

Selamlar Elektrikli araçlarda batarya sorunlarına değindik kzbin.info/www/bejne/iZa9qnirpNWjq8k .

[@dogacsahin5447]

I do 198 km speed this car

[@sp3c0ps]

This standaard digital dash is rly ugly, i thought all where the same except the maps option or size.

[@MrMaxusy]

Lol such bad driving. Indicating before even being able to merge, being on other people their ass at 2:23

[@fiatpanda5730]

On gps 100km/u ,on tacho 166 km/u....a littlebit off....👎👎🤥🤥

[@Ed-oy9rq]

Left = gps in Km/h, right gps in miles 😊