Kia Cee'd GT & Pro_Cee'd GT 2013 - acceleration 0-230 km/h and other tests

[@sepehr_moghani]

It's a great car I can say that and it's a great value for money. The only problem is it has a lot of wind noise. Specially over 140 Km/H

[@kd2833]

No shit over 140 lol

[@Mrzeng1]

That Turbo Spooling Sound is Sexy Love Kia That's one hot hatch Kia Pro Ceed GT 1.6 Turbo GDi

[@Mrzeng1]

Twin Scroll Turbo

[@JessShanahan]

The noise of this car is strange. It's so quiet in low revs. So calm. I didn't get much noise out of the one I recently reviewed unless I was red-lining it.

[@oddities-whatnot]

Quite rare in the UK, only a handful for sale on Auto Trader. Good value and proper natural sound, no fake noise pumped into the cabin, I feckin hate that.

[@cameronallen284]

Looking at the way the boost drops as the revs get to a certain point, this might indicate that there's some sort of boost limiting being implemented. If I'm correct, this may open the door to raising the maximum boost pressure, and being able to squeeze more power, out of say 100 octane fuel...

[@ArmadaAsesino]

It's just tuned to give better midrange and low end torque, meaning if you're driving a manual, you rarely have to red line it to get it to accelerate fast in daily driving. Saving you petrol in the process.

[@josemessi756.v8.]

98 oct

[@trifonovbg]

Fantastic!

[@Grey-Fox_94]

While the gas consumption is abit disturbing, please keep in mind that the car is reving a 6000 RPM on full throttle. The injectors would be wide open and constantly spraying fuel into the cylinders. The engine would certainly burn a lot of gas..

[@VD-is9pg]

The manufacturer specs for this car claim 7.4 sec from 0-100 km/h. But in this video seems more like 9 sec to me(from 0:14 to 0:23). Maybe I'm a bit wrong, but even so it's still far from 7.4 and the driver looks like shifting gears pretty well. Am I wrong?

[@lukaivanovic92]

In your opinion which is the best hothach? and whether kia worth so much money?

[@Nichtswert]

Ohne scheiss...der klingt fast wie ein Mitsubshi Lancer im Innenraum. Das wird mein Nächster.

[@MrCodLegacy]

I look forward to this car but what's the price point? If its the same as a focus st why but this? Its weaker

[@yavorm.7503]

It has been two months , is the comparison ready? quite curious to see it........

[@19duzza90]

Bloody 'ell, that turbo whistle is loud for a car that's only covered 1600km

[@yavorm.7503]

They way i see it it starts to slow down the tempo after 175 km/h, this is is where i think the leon gains. Is this observation correct?

[@rickyburtonshaw8051]

Mine won't boost past 80kpa, was ok when I got it 9 months ago, but recently not been right, anyone know what might cause this?

[@hakgar]

How about the fuel consumption in normal driving? Cause all I see here is a disturbing 17+ lt/100km......

[@pregno76]

average consumption ?

[@stefansorensen1218]

I got a Kia Ceed GT as well - but mine is way faster from 0-100 and even to 200. I have a 0-100 timer in my GPS and it said 7,0. It's 100% standard and i'm driving on Shell V-power 99 Fuel thats it.

[@gasperfantas]

+Stefan Sorensen hahah thats what everyone says and thinks about their car, even if you managed to get a couple of miliseconds to a 100 off, it doesnt really help the 0-200 speed, which is 35 seconds (very slow)

[@edikoven17]

Hello,can you please tell what ia the average fuel consumption?

[@raytag9036]

the full tank would do 252 km(156 mile) if u drive full power like in this video. and let say its dose 500km(310mile) if u drive normally

[@garystinten9339]

One of these retrofitted into a Kia Rio would be perfect. Does anyone know if there is a non turbo version of the display or can the turbo be switched off And What is the part number for this cluster if the turbo option can be switched off. Otherwise, a part number for a non turbo version of this cluster. Thanks.

[@sequoiaohz]

Da kann man zusehen, wie der den Sprit wegsüffelt.

[@giovanniteo1459]

καλα απ τις 2000 στροφες κανουν τις ρεπριζ? τι ειναι ντιζελ

[@marekrockermarek7121]

what ,22 l consumption??? Why?

[@Efren.2791]

Very nice car

[@mr13377]

Dont forget VAG uses WHP so it probably has more hp than the Kia in real life.

[@NToddMusic]

For 50 km it spent 1/4 tank

[@ghp0518]

To be more precise, it 63 km, given the fuel tank is about 52l a quarter is 13l giving an average fuel consumption of 20.6 l/100 km, damn...

[@felicedellasega7409]

1/3 really...

[@KuSQ3N]

if you drive fast most cars will be more then dubble the fuel consumption

[@Deegr]

Točíte nové videa na jiném místě? Nemohl jsem si nevšimnout, že vaše starší videa byla zkreslená, protože co jsem si všiml, tak jste vždy měli až zázračně rychlé auta. časy zrychlení, které jste dosahovali byli až přehnaně rychlá.

[@djsinusoid]

Anyone knows how to activate the digital speedometer in the middle of the cluster? Now it's showing the speed with a needle and I would like to have large digital number. Thanks a lot! Kia Ceed GT Line 2018

[@boektcity]

Press the gt button on the steering wheel. But i think only the real GT's have it

[@djsinusoid]

@@boektcity not having one. The car is GT line and it doesn’t have it. I need to activate it from the software somehow.

[@boektcity]

@@djsinusoid maybe you can get it added into the software at a kia dealer, not sure

[@samkaxe2488]

4500 rpm on 180 km I feel the car need one more gear

[@CitralPL]

It seems way slower than Leon SC 180ps you have recently tested.

[@MAHABO]

Proč tam furt jakoby skáče šestka? O.o

[@SpartanEx7]

Leon 1.8 TSI 0-200 23s Pro_Ceed GT 0-200 34s. Proud to be 2013 Leon 1.8 TSI 5dr owner.

[@emmanuelledesiles2246]

je kif le turbo et les turbo surtout sur une turbo essence

[@kadirkurt2841]

20lt yakit yuhhh

[@koocie2008]

pro ceed 1.6 T

[@michallukes588]

mám ceeda gt v garáži, jasné,že to ma na prd akceleráciu,ked nepoužívate pri radení,medziplyn,dal som dole v pohode leona,

[@RaacingAce]

Да лучше 150 доплатить и взять Мазду 6 2,5, едет она также но побольше и выглядит покруче

[@nikomatveev8638]

мазда 6 говно

[@Banane6996]

leon is faster, but 23s is not right...look videos on youtube, round about 30s are correct

[@quentin_3199]

1.6L Peugeot !? (THP 208)!?

[@thetruthwillsetyoufree4781]

THP by Peugeot is an utter piece of crap.

[@quentin_3199]

I’m the only one to never had problems with Peugeot Petrol like Diesel... I think this is hasard with the THP You have a good car or a big shit

[@creitosfl]

I have Kia Ceed 1.6 GDI 2013, my fuel consumption is about 9,5L in the city, i am disapointed cuz i thought it will spent about 8L but....

[@borto8888]

I have hyundai i30 GDI 135hp, Im disapointed also... Its good looking car, with grea electronics... but the motors are horrible! High consuption (over 8l city, 7,5 highway) with no power!. My car is 2013 and Im lready looking for new one. Probably the new Seat Leon FR

[@creitosfl]

Tomas B. Yep, I have to agreed with you, high counsumption, and also i really don't feel that 135HP, it's more like 110HP.

[@МаратМахмутов-о3ц]

7.6 секунд до сотни разгоняется по паспорту. ну у водилы 8 секунд где-то. он не давит тапку в пол. если бы хотя бы за 7 секунд сотку набирал, я бы купил сид. вялая какая-то машина. кое-как разгоняется до 200. ей бы 250 сил.а не 204 как заявлено. в ней думаю нет 204 сил. от силы 185 сил.

[@gmananton]

у него пробег всего 1500 - она обкатку еще не прошла. На обкатке у нее стоит принудительный электронный блок, чтобы не наваливали. После прохождения обкатки судя по отзывам владельцев едет гораздо бодрее

[@Metagalaktik]

Не сочиняй хуйню, там ниче не стоит, машина в полной боеготовности на видео

[@Metagalaktik]

У меня гольф 140 лс 1.4 седьмой, динамика ОДИН В ОДИН, 140 против 204 от киа, корейцам далековато конечно по технологичности до немцев

[@TheNotorious-v4m]

Александр Александров Этот сид с хорошим водителем 6,9 едет, посмотри видео у Алана Енилеева

[@miso_zaso]

na tie km čo s tým išli si to celkom dobre cuclo z nádrže:D

[@Metagalaktik]

Like golf 7 1.4 140 HP, 8 sec 0-100 and 19 sec 0-160

[@marcochristensen1859]

turbo

[@ixel3177]

50km driven and 1/4 fuel lost.

[@saigonixtv9862]

I drove with mine from Munich to Itali about 600km without stopping ^^

[@KuSQ3N]

i feel like mine is much faster from 150-200

[@daynight1921]

very slow shifting

[@dimsky3831]

u just lug in ur turbo dude

[@TheTranceLord]

yarım depo gitti amk

[@TheWeaponThayFear666]

I would rather walk

[@burgoscr]

Very slowly

[@RobVln]

Over 20l/100km? Come on… that's V8 range of fuel economy.

[@RobVln]

19DaRiO95 I can see that. I ain't retarded man. Downsizing just doesn't make sence to me. All they do is put small engine and supercharge it. What are the upsides of that solution? Wouldn't you preffer good old V6 or V8 under the hood?

[@bdmr_isf]

RobVln of course! downsizing sucks ass! i also drive a hyundai tiburon 2.7 V6 with ONLY 175hp, but its still faster than this cee'd GT with over 200hp. but you notice the difference in fuel consumption. this boosted 1.6l never needs as much gas as an old V6 with the same horsepower... but it makes the engine unreliable. look at the new VW TFSI engines, they dont even last 100'000km...

[@benanderson89]

19DaRiO95 VW group TFSI engines are terrible and under no circumstances should they be used to gauge the reliability of small engines. Small turbo engines from Nissan Europe, BMW/Mini, Citroen, Opel, Ford UK etc. are actually very reliable AND economical. Diesels especially. These small engines easily hit 200,000km+ as shown in countless Taxis. RobVln 20L/100km (11MPG American) is indeed very low, but he's flooring it right to the red line. V6s get around 25mpg (real world) or less just under normal driving, where this engine and many like it will hit 40+ quite happily. So the obvious upside is, quite obviously, double the fuel economy whilst still having a very good turn of pace AND loads of torque at the low end that you just wont get in a normally aspirated engine.

[@TTdexter]

19DaRiO95 I also have the same 2.7 V6 engine in my 2009 KIA Sportage. Yes, its a bit thirsty, but its very smooth and it has enough power for daily driving. But I think that those downsized engines would be as thirsty as this V6 if they had to move the same car at the same speed. There is a big difference between moving 1.300kg aerodynamicly shaped car (like ceed) and moving 1,700kg car with aerodynamics of a brick on a highway at 130km/h...

[@benanderson89]

TTdexter No, they are not as thirsty as the V6 in the absolute slightest. The car in the video has obviously been in a long, low gear thrashing session and in no way shows real world driving. 4Cyl engine here can pull very cleanly (especially good Diesels) and achieve well north of 40mpg.

[@michallukes588]

záleží akú máš ťažkú nohu,mňa spotreba netrápi.

[@kd2833]

Turbo sounds its dead soon

[@nitrogliserin]

urban myth.

[@interceptor213]

Slow! I'll keep my Megane RS 265

[@4039byrne]

I think my bluemotion 105hp Mk7 golf wouldn't be too far behind up to 200kph

[@interceptor213]

@@4039byrne something huge like 10 seconds slower

[@4039byrne]

@@interceptor213 they're still new to the game

[@matsuru7561]

мертвая телега

[@Dim1620]

il's no fast for 204PS.i have Mercedes c 250 ,2.0L turbo 211PS with 1550kg ,He's faster !

[@JGreen444]

larine dimitri your c250 probably has a lot more torque as well as a dct for faster gear changes

[@jakubgrania8513]

ani zadarmo...

[@apoput33]

with 1.500kms to 6500 rpm you are crazy. soon broken engine