AWS re:Invent 2021 - Deep dive on Amazon MemoryDB for Redis

  Рет қаралды 6,246

AWS Events

AWS Events

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 8
@galeop
@galeop 2 жыл бұрын
To sum up: AWS Elasticache is meant as a Read/WRITE data cache (sitting in front a DB), while MemoryDB is a durable DB (ie data is durable, no transaction is lost in the event of a failure). Just like AWS Elasticache, AWS MemoryDB stores all its data in memory. But for WRITEs, Elasticache replicates its data to replicas asynchrounously, while MemoryDB waits for its transaction logs to be replicated across AZs before acknowledging back to the client the success of the WRITE operation.
@phiwi2705
@phiwi2705 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome presentation Jon, thanks a lot!
@harekrishna7931
@harekrishna7931 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Mahesh, it was great session.👍
@michaljanecek1103
@michaljanecek1103 2 жыл бұрын
Thank god that everything is so SUPER EASY
@rushengzhang2959
@rushengzhang2959 2 жыл бұрын
AWS: please work on your documentations so we can easily use your amazing products. The documents are too verbose and it always takes me long time to finally get started, normally takes more than twice time than GCP.
@theefamiliar3497
@theefamiliar3497 2 жыл бұрын
I would call Amazon MemoryDB the worst Service I have used to date. All documentation, videos, specs is all buzzwords, not much actually useful things. I encourage anyone who is on the way of researching MemoryDB in 2022 to give up, and give AWS a couple of years to write decent docs. I find this extremely concerning
@nemurerumaboroshi
@nemurerumaboroshi Жыл бұрын
One hour video named "deep dive" that barely scratches the surface and gives incomplete, misleading information. It's not all about latencies and number of ops. One distinct feature of Redis that makes it stand out is its ability to run Lua scripts in sort of transactional manner. The problem with that is that this doesn't scale horizontally as well as they tell you in this video. All your transactional logic must be executed on a single shard to benefit from this consistency model. So it's not as nearly as simple as "add more servers" as they claim. There is also no information about recovery guarantees. "Fast recovery" - what does that even mean? What will happen specifically? How quickly my DB will get back online in case of a failure? Is it milliseconds, seconds, minutes? Will the process of recovery be transparent to DB client? No real information, just marketing stuff.
@awssupport
@awssupport Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your feedback. I've ensured your voice is heard by sending it off to our service team for review. ^RF
AWS re:Invent 2021 - Deep dive on Amazon Timestream [REPEAT]
53:51
AWS re:Invent 2021 - Deep dive on Amazon ElastiCache for Redis
47:59
It’s all not real
00:15
V.A. show / Магика
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
The evil clown plays a prank on the angel
00:39
超人夫妇
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
How to treat Acne💉
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 108 МЛН
CPU and GPU analysis with DCS World
21:29
Benchmark Odysseys
Рет қаралды 2 М.
Paper #171. Amazon MemoryDB: A Fast and Durable Memory-First Cloud Database
21:52
Getting Started with Amazon MemoryDB for Redis - AWS Online Tech Talks
48:51
Scaling 7M+ Postgres Tables! by  Kailash Nadh CTO @zerodha
19:51
Perfology
Рет қаралды 129 М.
Transformers (how LLMs work) explained visually | DL5
27:14
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
It’s all not real
00:15
V.A. show / Магика
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН