What Tristen said from 31:00 and especially after 33:08 was really eye-opening to me. I constantly need to push myself more, to be more productive and produce more and more, at a higher quality as well. But obviously that's unsustainable. Last year I had to step back a little because of the burnout, and feel guilty for doing so, burning me out even more! But I push through the burnout regardless as failure is not an option. I need to read more on Objectivism I think...
@nikos_171726 күн бұрын
I like the nuance Tristan introduced. Only you can now whether pushing through the burnout is worth it. It might be, if what's you're after is very important. Let's say in the example of his friend...if a law career is your dream, burnout might be a sign you need to slow down a bit, or maybe even ask for help by a mental health professional. Or it might mean you're after something you don't really want as something YOURS, like status etc. In that case to 'goggins it out' wouldn't be a great idea.
@MrMasoric27 күн бұрын
I can't wait to share this with my 17 year old son who is enamored with Goggins!
@nikos_171726 күн бұрын
Sounds great!
@mrjvc24 күн бұрын
Great discussion! I'll just add some quotes I like from David Lynch on this subject: "It's good for the artist to understand conflict and stress. Those things can give you ideas. But I guarantee you, if you have enough stress, you won't be able to create. And if you have enough conflict, it will just get in the way of your creativity. You can understand conflict, but you don't have to live in it." “The more the artist is suffering, the less creative he is going to be. It’s less likely that he is going to enjoy his work and less likely that he will be able to do really good work.” For me it's great to hear an accomplished artist push back on the errant idea that an artist needs to suffer or starve in order to create great art.
@nikos_171720 күн бұрын
How timely re. David Lynch this proved to be!
@christiangrosjean298019 күн бұрын
RIP
@debbieurosevic357828 күн бұрын
Prof Nikos is the best... .listening to him is a treat
@jonathanbauer298827 күн бұрын
Has to be one of my favorite people to listen to ever on this channel
@nikos_171727 күн бұрын
Aww, many thanks!
@ExistenceUniversity27 күн бұрын
Not a prof. That is a title. Nikos is not a Prof.
@christiangrosjean298019 күн бұрын
@@ExistenceUniversitytrue but so is doctor, yet people colloquially call some people doc. So prof is kinda like that rigt?
@ExistenceUniversity19 күн бұрын
@christiangrosjean2980 who does this?
@LaidBackPedalPusher27 күн бұрын
Thank goodness for reason. It always relieves suffering.
@WS-vk5tg27 күн бұрын
An old Ann Landers article ::The definition of maturity..Doing what has to be done, when it has to be done, whether you want to or not.
@gillesandfio844027 күн бұрын
When I go to the gym, I consciously avoid suffering. I aim to reach a metabolic rate that makes me sweat, and I get pleasure seeing my t-shirt getting wet with sweat. I aim to cause muscular burn, in contrast to pain which I avoid like the plague. Likewise when I go on a hash (a 10-20 km long hike in the local hills), I bring along my dog and together we visit many natural and archaeological sights (here in Central Italy). I consciously avoid suffering and I aim to and often accomplish pleasure in a very pure form. It keeps these hobbies alive.
@WillfulThinker27 күн бұрын
“Why do they always teach us that it's easy and evil to do what we want and that we need discipline to restrain ourselves? It's the hardest thing in the world--to do what we want. And it takes the greatest kind of courage. I mean, what we really want.” --Rand
@Triple_J.18 күн бұрын
What book, chapter or interview was this from?
@Draco-Dynamics14 күн бұрын
You guys are awesome! We love you. Keep up Gods good work.
@edbonz228 күн бұрын
Thank you. $
@johngleue27 күн бұрын
Goggins and the other guy literally said that they agree with the interpretation of that study that said that if you know and understand why something is good for you, then it doesn't expand your brain or whatever. This goes against pursuing firsthanded values altogether. I don't get how anyone could read into what they're saying positively. They're saying sacrifice is good in a materialistic way. They interpret these studies in a way that says going against what you really want is healthy for you. It honestly sounds like a contradictory argument because if you want to be healthy, then according to the study, you should force yourself to be unhealthy, and that will make you healthy.
@nikos_171727 күн бұрын
The study didn't say what you're implying here. Of course you understand that the difficult thing is good for you, and this is why you do it. The study says that if it becomes easy then it doesn't have the brain benefits a tougher pursuit has.
@johngleue27 күн бұрын
@nikos_1717 Apologies, I guess I misunderstood. It sounded like they're saying if it hurts, then it's automatically good, and if you know the action taken is good, then it doesn't have the same benefits because you'll actually want to take the action. So I read it as them being against any real purpose beyond putting yourself through hell for the sake of these benefits that you get from the suffering. It sounds duty driven.
@drixcel274127 күн бұрын
@@nikos_1717 At 6:45 it really seems like it's implying that enjoyment of an achievement - even of one that still difficult for you, like in the example Huberman gives: "...OR if you do it the next day AND enjoy it") - is counter productive. Highly likely that in the study there's more nuance to this, but what is being communicated here is a "practical" basis for the blank, stoic rejection of enjoyment of values
@drixcel274127 күн бұрын
Or in other words, as it's being implied that difficult = unpleasant and vice versa (as per the 6:45 example), a benevolent interpretation of this like "if it becomes easy then it doesn't have the brain benefits a tougher pursuit has" still concedes that a person of highest productive achievement would, by definition, never enjoy their efforts
@gorazionelson27 күн бұрын
For me, any suffering, troubles and endeavors have a sense only if they help me t achieve my eudaimonia. This Aristotelian concept is better then happiness, as well as flourishing of the life is more profound concept. Both of them include in themselves difficult challenges to live a life your want and deliberately chosen.
@nikos_171726 күн бұрын
Agreed. I like also Rand's definition of happiness that goes beyond the momentary. It's 'a succesful' state of being, close to what I understand as eduaomonia.
@gorazionelson26 күн бұрын
@ “successful state of being” is a powerful definition! It’s obvious that success is a state of affaire when desirable by individual things are happened according to his ideas. The measure of success is always egoistic (individualistic), as well as happiness/flourishing/ eudaimonia. I think that people take suffering as a principle of being because of the lack of the free will to work on their own world view, self-understanding and self-development. We don’t posses an innate reason , we have juts its potential (as a zip-file). To be a healthy “fully born” human we must unpack that potential and develop ot to the proper level. It’s our responsibility what ideas to accept.
@brrradley127 күн бұрын
I think it’s very important to be on guard here for second hand values. Make sure the values are yours and make you happy; it’s got to be ‘worth it’. I’m mixed about Goggins, I think some level of his self esteem is based on comparison with others.
@nikos_171726 күн бұрын
I do agree with the first part. I don't think Goggins is second-handed though. See for example how whenever he tells a story about a long distance race, he doesn't mention whether he finished first, which he sometimes did.
@brrradley126 күн бұрын
@ yes that’s true, and it’s hard to make a judgment because he’s such a force. I remember reading in his book he was ‘taking souls’ meaning beating others. Is this a form of second hand values or is it just a measurement of achievement? It’s tricky.
@frankrockefeller303826 күн бұрын
Happiness in mind, health in body and their mutual interaction and interplay. Suffering in Eastern thought is an effect and logical consequence of chasing illusions. Discipline in chasing illusions, rather than shedding illusions, intensifies resentment and reveals one's discontent with the world making the furthering of happiness and health illusive. Religious notions of suffering (dualistic) and sin (dichotomous) are imbued in Man's cultures and traditions. Nature is both passive (dualistic) and life/death active (dichotomous). Man has the freedom to dampen and navigate these extremes in peaceful exchange and logical achievement and avoid poverty, demoralization as value loss, discontent as emptiness, disillusionment......We engage in sports as purposeful-play - the dualities of team interactions with a worthy 'dichotomous' opponent that captures real interactions with the world with personal and team achievements. Taking ice baths is highly dichotomous - life-death - and dangerous. Playing video games as an innocent pastime is certainly more dualistic and passive.
@ExistenceUniversity27 күн бұрын
Inb4 Huberman argues that suffering by believing in God despite not really believing, makes your AmCC grow bigger and you will be healther despite your suffering...
@Draco-Dynamics14 күн бұрын
Christ existed so that he could endure the suffering of mankind. He was the original thinker. He came to show us the way to rise above suffering.
@peggyfranzen615927 күн бұрын
I like the character of Hank Rearden in " Atlas Shrugged " That's real. Middle class real.! Go farm or manufacture!
@christiangrosjean298019 күн бұрын
I respect and admire goggins. Highly motivated. But unguided motivation can be just moving a million miles. But in the wrong direction lol
@FreeToBe-gr827 күн бұрын
Man, y’all need to do one on Andrew Tate
@nikos_171726 күн бұрын
Meh, what for?
@patrickgrengs759427 күн бұрын
Goggins is seriously overrated... a self-inflated loud-mouth who appeals to low-level achievers.
@JohnSmith-bs9ym19 күн бұрын
After reading his biography, I think he's the Forest Gump of our time. His IQ is definitely in the 90s or even 80s. It's crazy the amount of mental tasks he just can't ever do. Though it can't be said that he hasn't tried his hardest.
@ExistenceUniversity28 күн бұрын
Of goggin' (puts a picture of a jogger)
@EvenFlow40628 күн бұрын
That's Goggins.
@ExistenceUniversity27 күн бұрын
Lol did you change the title because I teased you? 😂
@ExistenceUniversity27 күн бұрын
3:26 Nikos... really? Suffer = doing things that are hard? You think that's what people mean when they say "suffering"? Do you know what this actually is?? This is you projecting onto others. You either are gaslighting/not believing people when they say they are suffering, or you are projecting your feelings of suffering when you do something (probably improperly). Fundamentally, this simple means that this entire conversation exists ONLY in Nikos' head. 42:42 of Nikos' imagination run wild...again...
@Stefan-u5w27 күн бұрын
I dont't think Rand thought that someone with a bad childhood could be a hero
@nikos_171726 күн бұрын
Why? She believed in free will, and the possibility of one turning their life around.
@Stefan-u5w18 күн бұрын
@@nikos_1717 because of Branden
@jhljhl696426 күн бұрын
To live is to suffer. Pain is natural, while chasing happiness is like chasing a phantom through the desert.
@BiH1980Sana26 күн бұрын
I'm 14 and this is deep.
@nikos_171724 күн бұрын
Then why live? Or why have children, if life is predominantly about suffering?
@ExistenceUniversity27 күн бұрын
Yesterday I was busy and I stopped by just to make fun of the Joggin Goggin thumbnail. I just stopped to watch your video for real... Maybe delete this one quickly... You realize this dude is basically making Christian sacrifice a life goal, right? And he is 100% wrong about neuroscience as well!! Serious, guys, Harry, James, Nikos, Call me. I don't want to be on your show, thats gross, but call me and ask if its ok because you are really out here making fools of yourselves on the daily. I'll let you know if your science is good first!!
@ExistenceUniversity27 күн бұрын
5:00 Neuroscientist TRIGGERED!!!!! YOU WAT MATE? This will literally not make sense to anyone else in this community but to say of the [anterior mid-cingulate cortex] that "thats a noun, thats a name, that doesn't mean anything" is outrageous. Everything he is saying is just plainly wrong. It's the area in control of attention, focus, emotion, decision-making, and impulse control. It's essential you. So he is arguing from according to him "new things he is JUST learning" that that area grows bigger when.... STOP!! NOPE!! Not how we work in Neuroscience. Whose brain? What task? What computer imaging software? Blood flow? No no no! "This area of the brain grew" No! You have a tumor or what? Your focus brain region doesn't grow because you don't want to focus lol. Huberman is a conman. You bought what he was selling
@ExistenceUniversity27 күн бұрын
6:49 NO!!!!!!! HOW IS HE MEASURING BRAIN SIZE DAILY??????? YOU KNOW WE HAVE TO DISSECT YOU TO KNOW RIGHT??????
@jamesmcgilcrest494828 күн бұрын
David Goggins hate's himself as do most of these athletes and body builders
@terraflow__bryanburdo454727 күн бұрын
As a serious athlete and coach for over 50 years, I find little value in 90% of what he espouses. Pain is of value, mainly as feedback to avoid future suffering. With mastery, achievement continues with less suffering and more enjoyment.
@jamesmcgilcrest494827 күн бұрын
@@terraflow__bryanburdo4547 i would rather stick to a meat based diet with fruit and walk in the woods i don't need to do all that nonsense people in the gym do they are wasting their lives
@terraflow__bryanburdo454727 күн бұрын
@jamesmcgilcrest4948 I eat mostly raw meat, fish eggs and dairy, but I also love movement of any kind and crazy adventures! Just keep it fun and always learning something new.
@nikos_171727 күн бұрын
This is an unfounded and unjust evaluation.
@terraflow__bryanburdo454727 күн бұрын
@nikos_1717 listen to his interviews when he discusses his dad