Thanks for your comment. I see your point and perhaps using the word counterpart was not the best choice since there were not in the same type or function of aircraft. We are a fairly new channel that is interested in growing interest in ww2 aviation. I appreciate the feedback and we will take it into consideration in the future. Thanks Again.
@janmale7767Ай бұрын
Keep it up i didn't mean to be rude, hope you didnt experience it that way, but try and say things that are more than glaringly obvious!
@janmale77672 ай бұрын
B-17 counterpart Fw....how can a fighter be a bombers counterpart 😂 . Opponent yes not counterpart, thesel vids are junk rehashes of repeated stories!
@coreyrowland2 ай бұрын
When you forget the " counter" part of counterpart
@rodzorАй бұрын
B-17's German counterpart would be an HE-177..no? as in another bomber but German.