B&T P320 USW Tailhook Adapter

[@linglang5335]

Just ordered my adapter piece! Hopefully I get it soon! -Won.

[@HickLif3]

This is awesome, I just don't understand why the company doesn't have this option already.

[@Raltie]

This is awesome! Any way this can be modified for a G19?

[@shojus]

LOVE , love, love watching how you innovate! Great job brother!

[@jhlewis10]

So much win.

[@NextBigHitAgain]

i have been looking for this video for a year hahahah, will this work with the glock usw?

[@hickok2227]

You're a mad scientist!

[@InexorWoW]

At least you played it safe and didnt install the fire control group for the video.

[@Farrow_Tech]

My p320 has a safety, which the B&T doesn’t accommodate.

[@zackmanhan9417]

Did you have to shave off the existing hook on the brace? When I measure 7 3/4” it lands right on top of the factory hook.

[@1AbominAble1]

Awesome job, keep up the great work!

[@rkale77]

Is there any way to use a SBA3 with a set up like this instead? That would be awesome considering my state rules 😯

[@jimoyler1780]

I have a Kimmel Arms AP 9 can you make the entire set up to fit that firearm? That's if it's legal of course. Thanks

[@David-uq4kp]

Very Cool ! Can you Make a Sight Adapter for a RMR? Makes me want to get a 3-D Printer. Thank you from Alaska.

[@AndrewDasilvaPLT]

Those B&T Stocks are going for $100-150, its a shame you cut yours. We need an STL model for them!

[@Laotzu.Goldbug]

Will this adapter work on the stock bar on the original B&T USW the (CZ 75 based one)?

[@Farrow_Tech]

Not sure, want to find out?

[@rejectwerkz8314]

So I'm guessing this would work on the usw a1 as well? I assume they use the same dimensions on the stock.

[@Farrow_Tech]

Probably, but I don't have a usw a1 to test on.

[@justinheretotroll3032]

Very cool!!!

[@stephenballard2560]

Can you still put a flashlight on it?

[@cyrax10010]

I have a printer and I'll be your friend.

[@npc2377]

I assume this will also work for a regular USW-A1? Great job!

[@bengriffith5963]

While it is a cool idea, I would have a hard time permanently chopping my hard to obtain $250-300 B&T frame, and the strength of the 3D printed adapter is concerning as well, especially over hundreds of rounds fired.

[@NextBigHitAgain]

u can buy another stock from B&T the stock comes off

[@AndrewDasilvaPLT]

@@NextBigHitAgainfor $106-160, when and if they are in stock...

[@jman9022]

While I'm pretty familiar with NFA laws, how would this work with converting a stock to a brace? I realize it's simply just a stock that's not serialized so technically I guess you're just making your own unapproved pistol brace? That seems like it could get hairy if someone ever wanted to be an ass about it.

[@wolfwind9658]

How a brace attaches doesn't matter as it isn't a stock. We won the brace battle with the atf by not giving a shit about thier opinion btw.

[@Farrow_Tech]

It has been done before without issue: www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/02/chris-heuss/new-tech-smith-mfg-bt-tailhook-brace-adapter/ www.gearheadworks.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=72 www.gearheadworks.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=68

[@jerrypreen2665]

ATF Approval Letters for both the Tailhook Mod 1 and Tailhook Mod 2 are posted at Gear Head Works website. So your calling this an "unapproved pistol brace" is unfounded. Pistol braces are currently legal.

[@jerrypreen2665]

For a pistol to become an SBR one of the following would have to occur: 1: It would have to exceed an overall length of 26”. 2: It would have to exceed a Length of Pull of 13.5". or 3: It would have to have a Rifle Buttstock attached. None of these requirements occurred. So currently it is still a pistol.

[@jerrypreen2665]

Folding pistol braces on skeletonized arms are currently as legal as any other AR arm brace and are being sold by numerous manufacturers. If you know of an ATF regulation prohibiting folding skeletonized or buffer tube arm braces please post it in a reply.

[@roelrama8564]

Do you sell this let me know please

[@Dozer6001]

The B&T USW was built and sold as a "rifle", as an SBR option in the USA. You may be looking at legal trouble because of the "once a rifle always a rifle" rule. By converting this (SBR) rifle product to a pistol, you may have broken the law. Not trying to jam you up, just be careful.

[@Farrow_Tech]

This is for a p320, which is only sold as a rifle. The B&T usw-a1 can be purchased as a short barrel rifle or pistol, just look at dealer inventory.

[@dorianjumper8669]

Only if you buy the rifle version, you can purchase it as a pistol. Without the stock.

[@jerrypreen2665]

A Sig P320 FCU (Fire Control Unit) in a complete pistol originally sold as a "pistol" would remain a pistol until any one of the following occurred: It exceeded an overall length of 26”. It exceeded a Length of Pull of 13.5". A Rifle Buttstock were attached. Then and only then would it become an SBR.

[@jerrypreen2665]

In the video: Overall length of 26” was not exceeded. Length of Pull of 13.5" was not exceeded. A Rifle Buttstock was not attached (Because the Buttstock was cut off and replaced with an arm brace).

[@jerrypreen2665]

The B&T USW was NOT sold as a "rifle". The B&T Quick Installation Guide clearly states: "ATF has determined that this grip module does not constitute a firearm, frame or receiver as defined under 18 U.S.C. 921 a 3."

[@RangeTimeNetwork]

Sorry brother that will be considered an SBR by the ATF. I know because I submitted one. It was rejected.

[@SweeeTee]

Wow, really? How does this "submission" work? It sucks that this is seems a grey area in the domain of public opinion...but apparently clear to the atf...could you make a video about his? So we can all stay in the clear.

[@spldrong]

I doubt that. It's a brace and it's under the legal length. Also, these adapters are sold by other companies now

[@jerrypreen2665]

A "pistol" originally sold as a pistol would remain a pistol until any one of the following occurred: 1: It exceeded an overall length of 26”. 2: It exceeded a Length of Pull of 13.5". or 3: A Rifle Buttstock was attached. Then and only then would it become an SBR. Pistol braces may at some point be banned but are currently legal. So currently this build doesn't violate any regulations for pistols.

[@jerrypreen2665]

If you can cite an ATF regulation other than OAL, LOP and Buttstocks supporting your claim this is an SBR please post it in a reply.

[@ellijahsmith4445]

I mean I love the ingenuity but this is really dumb when you think about it. This takes away from the compactness of the PDW design B&T had in mind. If you think braces are better than stocks on SBR’s don’t bother getting into the NFA game. Again great job man but I can’t get down with this.