Babri Masjid Judgment Travesty Of Justice For Not Giving Secularism Its Due : Justice Nariman

[@drkhaleeq2696]

Impeccable coordination between brain and tongue. Calling spade a spade need guts....outstanding lecture.

[@pbghosh5305]

R. F. Nariman is one of the very fewest greatest JURISTS India has ever had. 🎉🎉🎉

[@prashantkuls]

Also, Justice Hansraj Khanna ... .the protector.

[@pbghosh5305]

@prashantkuls Yeah, of course, NOT AN IOTA OF DOUBT ABOUT IT that justice H.R.Khanna is one of the FEWEST. We remember him as ONE and ONLY ONE. 🙏🙏🙏

[@rajeevbhardwaj25]

Information & wisdom not always together, as many judgments overruled

[@drtaruns4968]

Outstanding lecture by His Lordship

[@rashidsultan43]

So scholarly. Thanks Justice Nariman I feel overwhelmed.

[@mijanurrahamanmollah9509]

Great speech and analysis.Deep respect to him. I think if Mr. Nariman would have been in the bench of Babri Mosque case, the verdict would be a different one. As a result, India would be freed from nowadays problems of excavation beneath mosques one after another. After Ayodhya, cases of Kashi Mathura, GyanbapVaranasi, Sambhal, Ajmer, Tajmahal and the list appears endless. The lower courts have been giving verdicts for excavation by ASI etc. The Places of Worship Act,1991 is of no use. Mr. D Y Chandrachud , the CJI at that time did not acted to restrain lower courts to move further.

[@narasimhamvakkalanka]

Nariman himself had the opportunity to prevent this 'travesty' when he was serving in the Supreme Court. He had the opportunity to decisively influence the verdict as a member of the bench, but he chose to recuse himself from the hearing. Had Nariman participated in the bench, he could have prevented, called out, or dissented against what he now calls a “travesty”. he chose to recuse himself then and is now speaking against the judgment five years later. The question is-why did he recuse himself? It is a convenient ruse. Recuse yourself from hearing and criticizing the judgment delivered! Unfortunately, we had such judges in our supreme court! Postretirement some judges become wise, now it is the turn of this so-called wise man.

[@mijanurrahamanmollah9509]

@@narasimhamvakkalanka Where did you get that Mr. Nariman had chosen to recuse himself from hearing? Provide the details in support of your claim.

[@narasimhamvakkalanka]

@@mijanurrahamanmollah9509 up to mediation efforts in 2017 he was there and when it was in favor of one side why he encouraged medication. As a senior judge who served the court 5 years that cannot be thrown out in an ordinary case.

[@mijanurrahamanmollah9509]

@@narasimhamvakkalanka Irrelevant and not to the point.

[@satishk7406]

ASI report mein saaf hai ki 1528 se lakar 1857 tak aur 1528 se pehle vahan mandir k avshesh hain aur ye judge toh uss report ka zikr bhi nahin kar raha hai.😂

[@alokgupta4200]

In our country, not only do we have vast income and wealth disparities, but the disparity in knowledge and wisdom is much greater. Listening to J. Nariman is always a great learning experience. His praise of J. Ahmedi has also motivated me to listen to him.

[@aap223]

This sereies of lectures should be a part of a Law degree curriculum. A reserch thesis must be written before offering a graduate degree. Looking at the number of people watching, it seems most of the Indian Law students are not interested in learning anything new or making them to think, prepare and learn by heart beyond the objective questions.

[@DonFleming-v2u]

The bigoted Babari verdict is going to haunt this nation until it is corrected or forever.

[@proudhindustanihindu2725]

What they give,will get in return

[@mohanyadav9998]

Such justice needs to be done with Indian Hindus for all other places that are in court....

[@manivannanchokkalingam8251]

one country, one law, one vote 🗳

[@Sreenagesh]

Very informative Thank you

[@jahanzebali6240]

Thankyou very much sir.... You come forward without any fear

[@pbghosh5305]

The MOST DEFINITIVE answer to the ISSUES, which AIL the country these days.

[@m.k.subrahmanya_chande]

Justice should be Justice for all. Not according to Nariman only.

[@GALAVNAGARI]

Very scholar, witty and informative lecture by Hon'ble Justice R F Nariman ji. This lecture provides insightful knowledge about the subject matter i.e. Secularism and our constitutional status about it.

[@madhureddy3945]

His knowledge of Hindu Laws is clear in his judgment in the case of Uttam Vs Saubhag Singh. Thank god, that utter wrong judgment was overruled by the judgment in Vineeta Sharma case.

[@mdsohrab3488]

What an analysis and deep knowledge. Huge respect for you Sir

[@advkrishnakumartripathi3245]

What a joke...... Btw Parsia was Parsi nation... And today there is no Parsi.. Muslim killled all of them... And coward parsi had taken shelter in India

[@chandramoulinv5992]

While treating the words of an ex Judge of the Supreme Court and without offering my comment. Would HMJ Rohinton Nariman be able to throw light on why he recused. Himself from the bench for the Ram Janmabhoomi case. He had a great opportunity to influence the course of the case and he missed it.

[@manojbhartigupta6555]

भारत माता की जय...हिंदु धर्म के मौलिक गुण उदारता पर कलंक है अयोध्या मंदिर...सब याद रखा जाएगा ! 👍❤️👍

[@kalaimani5424]

Somebody speaks the truth of the Ayodhya issue ❤❤

[@abhaytiwari5501]

With Respect......Jali to hai 😂

[@sagarbansode6935]

Great lecture

[@tosmp]

Totally agree

[@tairendrathorat2285]

True Judge of Indian constitution

[@manojbhartigupta6555]

👍❤️👍

[@aleemjaved001]

justice narimans words ...true

[@arunavadasgupta2147]

My wife Mrs KasturiDasgupta Very bold Political science Hons Monetary Diploma Was school teacher Good home maker And honest She now suffering from Accute depression hence I had taken to Dr Ankit Mukherjee Scicotheray treatment

[@ShyamNemo]

a bigot talking about secularism ... 😂

[@atifaslam4177]

Good analysis...

[@rajeevbhardwaj25]

Information, wisdom not the same thing 😊

[@mohibquadri4053]

Brilliant and spot on 👍

[@sufialhussainihassanikamil9655]

One of the few judges who doesn't seem to care about a retirement plan I guess! lol

[@ChackraTantra]

The onus of secularism dos not only lay with hindus, islam is inherently not secular. Why should they get what they do not offer to others . Like morality, secularism exists between two secular people.

[@sasankarai7256]

The land for a masjid is already been given, when there was no need for one. Justice delivered going out of the way like that is injustice and it remains to be corrected in future. That babri will also fall for sure. True justice will be served only then and secularism given it 'due importance'.

[@AzharKhan-kf7me]

Liive a life of a lion for a day. Honesty is very powerful, even the weakest of all seems powerful. Praying for your wellbeing

[@rajk7007]

With the sort of unequal and highly skewed birth rates between various groups, secularism is at risk..!

[@TheRabelMonk]

All the temples demolished by mughals will be taken back woth supreme court approval or without approval. We have had enough of these hypocrites thinking very high of themselves.

[@amittripathi6748]

secular word wasn't in origional constituon , its game of congress , .....its pain of not getting Post retiral job

[@srirathin.iitbhu]

Right

[@narasimhamvakkalanka]

Nariman himself had the opportunity to prevent this 'travesty' when he was serving in the Supreme Court. He had the opportunity to decisively influence the verdict as a member of the bench, but he chose to recuse himself from the hearing. Had Nariman participated in the bench, he could have prevented, called out, or dissented against what he now calls a “travesty”. he chose to recuse himself then and is now speaking against the judgment five years later. The question is-why did he recuse himself? It is a convenient ruse. Recuse yourself from hearing and criticizing the judgment delivered! Unfortunately, we had such judges in our supreme court! Postretirement some judges become wise, now it is the turn of this so-called wise man.

[@CurrentAffairs-z1f]

Totally misinformation you have given on Mr Honourable Judge RF falinarimon

[@iuvvuiieii]

Mythology overtakes History.

[@chahal840]

Thank you for your outstanding lecture i can listen him all day ! Hes amazing in everything law ,medieval history ! I wish you had remained a judge in the supreme court for a longer time !

[@aap223]

54:57 on wards: Not only reasonable doubts but with malafied criminal intentions, the Babri Masjid verdict was decided and given in favor of ramlalla, who wasn't even an original claiment on the plea. Travesty of justice in its clear form; criminals got free, a historical monument and a articulate piece of super architectural mosque destroyed, a disputed land of 5 acres given to the mosque trust never to be realized in getting it. Babri case is for the law history, a permanent black mark on the SCI for ever.

[@amittripathi6748]

Babri case is a benchmark of indian justice system ok

[@jiyasm]

Ram janmsthal samajh kar saare hindu samaaj Babri Masjid sthal ko pujega, kyoki ki is sthal ka pramaan kisi hindu dharmic kitaab mei nahi, lekin ha city ka naam Ayodhya bataya hai lekin sthal nahi. Sthal toh hame politician ne bataya jinko dharm mei pramaan nahi mana jayega. Iska matlab jo hamare dharm se pramanith nahi aur koi bhi manusya ke paas ye authority nahi pramanith karne ka. Iska matlab ham ek fake sthal ko pooj rahe hai, dharm ki manyata mei milawat kar rahe hai.

[@m.k.subrahmanya_chande]

Why grate persons shut thier mouth when many temples are destroyed. Why persons talk in plat form attacking Rama temple. Peace should not disturb. Disturbed by non sense soeach. I India has great history. We need not follow other country constitution at alp.

[@srinathmadhu3595]

A person who is supposed to be a judge who spoke only of the past is apparently living in some lulu land

[@skghulamrasul3397]

Save democracy ✨✨✨✨

[@zahoormehdi6440]

India is secular with communal society. Constution emphasis on secularism but religious communities does not like it. Secularism is religion of India. Secularism is not against religion.

[@ramji_ki_katha]

Tell this to Bangladesh too. It is also Secular, Democratic, Republic.

[@dharaneesh4027]

It is a known fact that this judge is biased against Hindus, in each 1 of his judgement by selectively quoting what left/commis were saying. When he talks about secularism, is he trying to say criminals/law breakers and normal citizens are same, it seems only Hindus must be secular and should allow the illegals to continue occupy any place in Bharath. Worst is that his western obsession can be seen in each of his quoted judgements and the way he tries to talk about other religion in high but by skipping the believes of Hindus is not surprising. For ppl like him Yogi should not be a CM, but he can be a judge of SC, even when his own father was admitting that this man was similarly placed. Irony, Bharath n Hindus have to face not only litigants but even judges with apparent bias.

[@manojsaw9635]

Sickularism 😅😂

[@raisahmad2363]

Highly excellent analysis and view

[@faizanhussain5546]

Someone has the balls

[@MohankurupKurup-lk1ul]

You must define the meaning of secularism.

[@Harpreet-t2h]

Ye to courts hein jo haz subsidy ko bhi secular act mante hein.

[@Hustlerrr123]

Just a nepo kid

[@AshrafKhan-nm5wc]

🙌🙌

[@sanjeevsirohi8056]

My very best friend Sageer Khan in Mackronia locality in Sagar in Madhya Pradesh 31 years ago Slammed USA and UK as most dangerous countries in the world who add United before their name but always favour division of other countries especially India who hate Hindus most as maximum number of freedom fighters were Hindus and then Shias and lastly Sunnis also! UN said Sageer Khan is pet dog of USA and UK and adds United before their name and still Sageer Khan said I wonder why India wants to become permanent pet dog of USA and UK by becoming permanent member of UN Security Council? Regards and best wishes Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate

[@ranganathanv5365]

A walking encyclopedia

[@MMHSardar]

Finally someone called it out...Salute sir...

[@mohammedjaffarsaleem2865]

Can we initiate review petition in future?

[@DheerajSaxena-s5p]

Well the bro might join congress. Off course the name of nariman sir elicilts respect for the level of knowledge possessed by him. But his questioning a judgement delivered by mejority of SC banch now is suspecious. As i recall , those historians (mainly leftists) or others who talked otherwise to the existence of the temple ,failed to prove or even submit a strong case in the hearing before SC. In such a scenario their utterances r just personal opinions and not tenable in the eyes of law. I am not a law professional but have been reading/discussing HC/SC case laws on taxation/financial matters while studying for CA. With due respect to SC's stand on this ,I think the places of worship act negates the right of a common man to go to HC/SC and seek justice based on maintenanable evidence on such issues. U can't deny a person his right to file suit/petition on any issue in HC/SC JUST because there might be communal disharmony. Off course the courts can deny and not entertain such petitions if they think it will be right in the delivery of justice. The law must stand on the right side without any fear whatsoever. The past mistakes must be corrected if there is maintainable evidence. Further even if his personal opinion is taken into account than shaivite/jainist/buddhist iteams were found underneath..this means that the mosque was not there originally. As per him the site can belong to either of jains/Buddhists/shaivaites but rules out it belonging to islam. The justice must be done ,even if it is delayed , wiithout making the judiciary a prisoner of any fear whatsoever.

[@mintusaren895]

AMERICAN LOANEE TO FRANCE IF LIBERTY.

[@satyasingh1998]

Kashi , mathura will be there ,you all can cry again😂😂

[@sarahenglishclubspokenengl1300]

You seem to be living in the stone age and craving for the engraved stones which are prayed like uncivilized people...I have engraved one devil shaped Idol so come and buy to pray to it...

[@JoyChandra-q9x]

Need more and more temple to be built,so that chinna need to learn how to made pillars on foundation to be erected,😂😂😂😂

[@balamurugansubburaman5242]

Just a useless, shameless and brainless sanghi - just a unnecessary weightage to the world with no use for the country

[@sabyasachidutt9605]

He seems to be so stupid and immature while referring to Akbar The Tyrant as a Secular Leader , and Emporer Ashoka was also never Secular but a Sanatani Leader for Secularism means ' Goverance of Deliverance never connected with Religion ' and Ashoka connected his entire Rule with Buddhism, if Historical Facts are correct as such he was never Secular.

[@ramji_ki_katha]

Kashi Mathura Baaki hai.

[@parthsarthy8120]

Babri masjid judgement is the darkest thing that can happen to a democracy like India 😔😔

[@ChackraTantra]

Wait for waqf and ucc 😅 you will feel darker than this.

[@PranjalPatel-h2o]

P89

[@ameerkhanbahamani6198]

Now a days this type of justices are very rare...

[@saurabhtripathi7445]

Very good lecture on Secularism. But misses one crucial point. He should acknowledge that the dispute of Ram Mandir in India was approached through the formal justice system. Members of no other religion would have approached the Courts at all. And would not have even allowed this knowledgeable lecture.

[@kalidasswaminathan4341]

Nonsense.

[@sushmachandak3316]

He is a rogue person, knows nothing about what the role of a judge should be

[@Aditya-rl1nc]

Secularism is everywhere in ashoka to akbar , nali saaf krne wala jhadu se pitunga bhai. Kya comparison kar raha hai. Justice Natwarlal

[@alokverma9410]

He should say something for corruption in christian and muslim religion.

[@sanjivgupta1418]

Secularism is not about protecting and promoting lies.

[@ishtiaqali2719]

No words are enough to appreciate his analysis of facts and law in such a bold way. Full respect to you sir 🙏🙏

[@safiyac8139]

Anybody entered into any masjid compound samarpanam ya sashtangam its Allha devotion,even ramen puthla be, because musalman waqafed means niyyath ya nercha ya donated to the one and only god Allah almighty,whoever entered and submitted to Allha devotion,the positive angelic energy of masjid and its compound belongs to Allha ,those who entered inside later may becomes musalman..its a fact....

[@ChackraTantra]

Sir please enlighten us on how secular the waqf act is also. Your deep insights would surely help.😅

[@dr.s.square1491]

And How Secular is WaQf Board??

[@Bskshebxksiebc-e8jk]

As secular as asking poor people to chant JSR then only he gets food

[@rrao7963]

​@@Bskshebxksiebc-e8jkhindu rashtra ram janmabhoomi

[@akhilsingh1425]

Sab galat hai bas ye bkl sahi hai

[@garimakanaujia1676]

Saleeeee budheeeeee kaminaaaaa