Bach - English Suite n°3 - Richter Tours 1991

[@bloodybonescomic]

I am an American working class man of the lowest class there is. I probably have no right to comment on music. But I have discovered Bach. And I have discovered Richter. I have discovered art and beauty that exceeds anything else in my life. This recording ... I have no words.

[@vivafranz3895]

I think you have more right to comment than anyone else. And if you have discovered Bach and Richter you have years and years of discoveries ahead of you. Greetings from Florence. Long live great music!

[@johnvalentine4720]

Haven't listened to Richter for a while. I'd almost forgotten he is the greatest pianist of the modern era.

[@UEDSC]

Ah, late Richter! What can be deepper and more profound then? Sarabanda in this suite in his hands is just unbelieveably cosmic... Bach must be was from the heavens, this music speaks about something unhuman, divine... tells us about so special experiences which can be only put in the soul of a man with clear thoughts and heart, who are able to keep his connection with understanding of true, divine nature of love and suffering... the experience, that in it's deeppest form, will purify the world around... Such an exciting music!

[@mairaleikarte43]

💙💚❤️💜

[@Sofronichrist]

Dans ce public de 1991, à Tours, Sviatoslav Richter signe certainement sa meilleure interprétation de la troisième suite anglaise, BWV.808, et plus généralement l’un de ces chefs d’œuvres dont on se lasse jamais. Même Pogorelich n’a pas ce relief, Goud, cette métaphysique, et Schiff cette profondeur. La sonorité ample et solennelle emporte le flot vers les cieux, pour être lyrique. Plus simplement, cette interprétation est un passage : on change entre les premières mesures et les dernières. Il y a là un génie qu’il y avait certes en 1948, à Moscou, mais qui est arrivé à maturation, et qui énonce ce qu’aucun mot ne pourra jamais transcrire : la beauté qui fait l’essence même de Bach.

[@antonellamajorano5348]

Com è bello questo suo commento! Grazie. La penso anch'io così.

[@shadowjuan2]

Kinda sad that everyone is mentioning Richter and that they hadn’t listened to Richter, but what you are truly listening is BACH.

[@사사삭-b4k]

Prelude 0:00 Allemande 3:33 Courante 6:38 Sarabande 8:59 Gavottes 19:16 Gigue 22:21

[@renaudbeigneux]

j'y étais: mémorable !!!

[@paulrobertvincentluderitz2399]

¡absolute fantastic version¡with very fine tempo and grand expresion a must to listen

[@prassitelexk4336]

uber alles!!!!

[@antonellamajorano5348]

Trovo che questa versione, un po' più lenta e meno martellante, sia bellissima. La mia preferita.il timbro di Richter è ineguagliabile. La Sarabanda è magnifica , profondamente spirituale. Purtroppo Bach è spesso utilizzato x dare sfoggio di grande tecnica. Idem si può dire x Scarlatti , dimenticando la loro profonda spiritualità che emerge anche nei passaggi di maggiore difficoltà tecnica. Adoro il periodo Barocco forse anche per questo.

[@wolfgangklofat594]

Auch von Haus aus außermusikalische Bezeichnungen passen zu Richters Spiel: weihevoll, andächtig, heilig...

[@vova47]

Gavottes 19:12

[@横山恵美-e2n]

76歳のときの演奏

[@DfhjjgxfSjhfbsjs]

А этот который чернобелые не принимает просто честный