BEST IMAGE STABILIZED BINOCULARS? | Sig Zulu6 HDX vs Kite APC

[@w.vangelder108]

Don't worry about battery consumption. I have used the Kite 16x42 every weekend for almost a year now and still use the same battery set. Next time, no spare batteries will be used (at least not in the first half of the year).

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@w.vangelder108 thanks for the insight!

[@shem44]

SIG should implement button instead of flipping switch to change mode. Flip to turn on, push button to toggle between scan and target mode.

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

Hey! Yeah, I think that would be a nice improvement I think. Thanks for watching!

[@christopherdavis9137]

Thanks for the comparison video! I hope you review Kite’s new APC 50 soon.

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

Absolutely! We are actually testing them out right now. Thanks for watching!

[@hubbs478]

I know you can't include every IS binocular but I would have liked the Kite 14x50 and 18x50 included

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@hubbs478 hey! Yeah, it's tough to get them all, but those Kite ED 50mm models came out after this review was done. We are testing them now! Thanks for watching!

[@wildfoodoutdoors]

thought my headphones died at the start but your voice audio is only set to the left channel 😅

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

Hey! Thanks for the heads up. I realized I had a technical issue after the video was published...ugh! It plays in both speakers/headphones if done on a computer, but sometimes not on a phone. Sorry!

[@wildfoodoutdoors]

@@BackwoodsPursuit no worries. I got so sick of it happening to me on my own videos I reset my timeline defaults to mono 🙈 surprisingly very few instances where I actually have stereo recordings.

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@wildfoodoutdoors agreed! Yeah, I changed my mic settings etc to correct it LOL. So frustrating as it plays normally on my computer and in headphones on the computers, just not on headphones when on your phone.

[@HogDogKrohn]

I would love a review on the 50 mm objective Kite. It looks like it's just coming out now to a few stores. Interested if if the low light characteristics are much improved and if the IS is better as well. By any chance will you be reviewing this product?

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

Hey there! Actually, I am going to and have them on their way right now! Stay tuned!

[@HogDogKrohn]

Ty, I appreciate your reviews and in-depth analysis.

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@HogDogKrohn glad to hear it and thanks for following the channel!

[@jrnumex9286]

i have sig gen 2 20 x. up against different models i have luepold, vortex, fujinon some on tripod some not zulu is king.

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@@jrnumex9286 thanks for the insight!

[@shem44]

Hi. Not sure if you have a chance to do a FOV of SIG 10x30 vs 12x42. I have the 12x42 and find the FOV too narrow sometimes. The 10x30 is 5.2 degree vs 3.8 on the 12x42. I want to get the 10x30 but because the EP is only 3, I'm afraid it will be hard to get perfect view without blackout. On the 42 I do experienced imperfect view and need frequent adjusting and on the 30 it may be worse? Any thoughts?

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

Hey there! Thanks for the question. I can't say that I noticed a big difference in that way between the 10x30s and 12x42s, but I also wasn't specifically looking for that difference. The 10x30s were noticeably worse in low light as you can imaging with that much smaller EP. Thanks for watching!

[@francesco1945]

Hi best video! The Sig HDX 16X42 in scan mode, stabilizes like the Kite always about? Thank you

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

Thank you! Not sure what exactly you are asking? Thanks for watching!

[@francesco1945]

if the stabilization in scan mode of the SIG HDX 16X42 is similar to that of the Kite 16X (which I tested) so as to understand. Thanks

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@francesco1945 oh...gotcha. yeah, they are close I would say. I thought the Kite were slightly smoother scanning than the Sig, but very close. Thanks!

[@redpillnibbler4423]

Any with eye relief over 18mm?

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

Hey there! I believe the most any of them have is 17mm of eye relief. The specific eye relief of each is mentioned in the video though. Thanks for watching!

[@redpillnibbler4423]

@@BackwoodsPursuit Thanks for that.

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@redpillnibbler4423 absolutely!

[@EL_Toro1]

What about prices comparison?

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

Hey there! They are pretty close in price overall, with the Sig being roughly $100-150 less across the board. Thanks for watching!

[@ken-ec9wv]

great review, thanks for sharing your experience with these binoculars, i have the canon 18x50,,12x36 v.3 and the 10x30 v.2 , i’ve been a backyard astronomer and birder over 40 years now, i’ve had some great telescopes and binoculars over that time, my question is on the objective lenses, i see they are not round and looks like they are flat where the two objective lenses, or closest to each other in the center of the binocular, i do know you still get a perfect circle just like the binoculars that have completely round lenses for the objective lenses, so does that make them smaller than the 42mm lenses that they are or does those flat spots on the lenses don’t make a difference ?? hopefully i explained it correctly, just never seen objective lenses with flat spots on the edges on the one side ?? thanks, ken. i’ve been using the 3 canons since 2018 with no problems and they are awesome.

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@ken-ec9wv hey there! Yeah that makes sense. Like you said, the field of view is still round, but I'm not 100% sure how the lens size is measured with that flat spot in the center. Good question but I don't have an answer on that one. Sorry!

[@ken-ec9wv]

thanks, it’s interesting for sure, 👍

[@BackwoodsPursuit]

@ken-ec9wv might have to call Sig or Kite and and 😁