Never used it before, and never knew the use of it, but now I'm going to keep my eye on it. Thanks man.
@Nguyen_MRI9 ай бұрын
Give it a try 👍
@TiagoSantos-ls9ze4 жыл бұрын
Amazing, I always looked to this tool and thought "what that thing do?", Thank u, very much
@yongmsong4 жыл бұрын
Didn’t know you can do the retrospective reconstruction for interpolation. Thanks always for awesome practical videos!
@melisahensley7962 Жыл бұрын
For real, the practice videos are extremely helpful. Interpolation was amazing!! The fine detail difference was crazy!!!!
@mihaimoldo2 жыл бұрын
So there's no drawback to using it. Awesome! Thank you for the content Bac. Love every one of your videos.
@bronevichok05074 жыл бұрын
You blow my mind! Thanks! Yes, use it for making images sharper if I don"t have time for increasing matrix size
@72DIMOS4 жыл бұрын
Always using it, especially when I don't use sguere matrix
@حبالنبيباتباعسنته-ص8ج4 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Mind blowing. Keep it up. Mohamed from SUDAN.
@ping7004 жыл бұрын
Yes we do use interpolation when scanning
@davidbrown79323 жыл бұрын
Wow great job Bac your presentation is amazing fantastic 🙏
@Nguyen_MRI3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for kindly words.
@badrlinux67864 жыл бұрын
that’s what I call a fine job 👌 keep it up bro🐱🏍
@JC-ru3mo4 жыл бұрын
Great video. Thank you. 😎
@scottgloverjohnson4 жыл бұрын
Pretty much always use interpolation in - plane; I believe GE turns out on automatically for any frequency /read matrix above 256. Never liked the look of through-plane/slice interpolation though, UNLESS the acquisition is going to do reformats. Seen a lot of protocols with slice interpolation on like a 6-7mm slice, just never looked good to my eye.
@TheM55m4 жыл бұрын
Nice video 👍 i am from Saudia Arabia
@agniredfieldmusic3 жыл бұрын
Amazing video!
@SuperMusammil4 жыл бұрын
Nice. First comment
@diyarphysicist71413 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@bism_allah Жыл бұрын
بارك الله فيك ان شاء الله 🤍
@gulnaragayeva1704 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@Adam-o4h Жыл бұрын
OK! Thanks for your Videos! Why shouldn't I always use interpolation? What is the disadvantage? Or, for what kind of sequenzes it is not good?
@Nguyen_MRI Жыл бұрын
From my experience I use it wherever I can.
@joedh19884 жыл бұрын
Great video. Also didn't know about the retrospective recon, very handy. Bit off topic, but could you retrospectively recon a sequence from say non fat saturated sequnce to fat saturated using this method?
@Nguyen_MRI4 жыл бұрын
No, this I don’t think it’s possible.
@iansze26522 жыл бұрын
I think you can only recon the raw/scanned images only....if fat sat (or any other scan sequence modification) was not applied during the scan, you cannot reconstruct it
@babjigandi95484 жыл бұрын
What does interpolation (2,2),(3,3) upto (6,6) means?If we increase this order do we get good image?and does it take more time if we do with (6,6).What range is enough actually?
@babjigandi95484 жыл бұрын
That’s fine if interpolation 1 means it’s turned off and 2 is on.Can you please tell it for 3,4,5,6 what does they do.will be waiting for your answer Thank you 🙏🏻
@Nguyen_MRI4 жыл бұрын
2 means it’s double. So having 256 it will be 512. 3,4,5 shouldn’t be play around with. Means you double it even more. And that just messing with everything.
@no-de3lg4 жыл бұрын
Your video awesome thanks really but what it really means interpolation?
@Nguyen_MRI4 жыл бұрын
Good question. Please check this link for further understanding: mri-q.com/zip.html
@23232Bing4 жыл бұрын
Second comment!
@abrabr6720 Жыл бұрын
I see you using “copy image position” what does it do . Thank you
@Nguyen_MRI Жыл бұрын
It’s more like copying the image where you at. So you don’t have reposition etc. Doing this the new plan of yours will align at same position as the one you position. Please try it out and you will understand more of it. I use it all the time for planning. Being able to work faster and more efficient.
@abrabr6720 Жыл бұрын
@@Nguyen_MRI will certainly do try it. Thank you so much for a quick response. Please keep going nothing is simple or difficult in MRI all important. Always looking forward to seeing your videos
@Nguyen_MRI Жыл бұрын
@@abrabr6720 awesome. Yes it’s try and fail all the time. Nothing is more important to share the knowledge in the community. More videos will come. Stay tuned 👍
@abrabr6720 Жыл бұрын
@@Nguyen_MRI looking forward
@nileshraval82954 жыл бұрын
Can you make video for chemical shifting artifact c spine region t1 fs sequnse, how to reduce .please can u explane sir
@Nguyen_MRI4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for comment. There is no chemical shift artefact on fatsat sequences because you already suppressed the fat. Please read more here: mriquestions.com/chemical-shift-artifact.html
@patrickivancruz14212 жыл бұрын
Hi, How can I see the reconstructed images on the viewing mode after creating? I can’t open it :(
@Nguyen_MRI2 жыл бұрын
Should be in the browser like the rest of the other sequences.
@patrickivancruz14212 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your help! :) another question? Is there any possibility to retrieve deleted images in siemens scanner?
@Kareem-Yuji3 ай бұрын
What,s the name in Phillips
@Nguyen_MRI3 ай бұрын
@@Kareem-Yuji believe it's the same name.
@뫼삼2 жыл бұрын
What's trade- off use to be interpolation?
@Nguyen_MRI2 жыл бұрын
None
@balakrishnavaddepally45213 жыл бұрын
Any disadvantages of using interpolation
@Nguyen_MRI3 жыл бұрын
From experience no. But I’m going to do further testing after great comments here which made me curious. Stay tune
@SuperMusammil4 жыл бұрын
Please dear k space
@praveenreddy781010 ай бұрын
Plz new protocol
@Nguyen_MRI10 ай бұрын
?
@praveenreddy781010 ай бұрын
In need lower limb angio of protocol
@taivo62414 жыл бұрын
can you share to me some books about parameter mri ( pdf) ¿
@Nguyen_MRI4 жыл бұрын
I don’t have any pdf of books. I recommend you to invest in this one for further understanding : www.amazon.co.uk/Handbook-MRI-Technique-Catherine-Westbrook/dp/1118661621/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?dchild=1&keywords=catherine+westbrook+mri&qid=1600528042&sr=8-3
@sudishkumarp19444 жыл бұрын
How we minimize time in DWI sequence in spine plz make video
@shadowboxer64622 жыл бұрын
Then why have it off ever
@Nguyen_MRI2 жыл бұрын
Good question. One thing is to save space. Having it on the file is larger. BUT that shouldn’t be the main reason. To your answer: I don’t know why it is off from the siemens tree. But you can clearly see the impact off that by having it on.