Bad News For Starliner! NASA Is Very Mad-Astronauts Aren't SAFE to back on Earth...

Bad News For Starliner! NASA Is Very Mad-Astronauts Aren't SAFE to back on Earth...
===
intro 0:00
(The success of the trio: Nasa, Boeing, and ULA) 0:41
(Why did Boeing fail?) 2:24
(Way back home) 6:45
outro 8:54
===
#techmap #techmaps #elonmusk #starshipspacex #nasa
===
Bad News For Starliner! NASA Is Very Mad-Astronauts Aren't SAFE to back on Earth...
How do you feel when you watch this video:
The dance that the astronauts did as they came out of Starliner's hatch, and met up with the ISS crew was fun to watch.
And I prayed that they could do it again after they returned to Earth.
However, that hope is really very fragile when the Boeing Starliner's thruster problems seem to never end.
Repeating one mistake two times is unacceptable for the orbital vehicle, especially a spacecraft built at taxpayer expense.
Nasa Is Mad: Why Boeing Starliner Thruster Still Fail???
Find out everything in today’s episode of Techmap.
Bad News For Starliner! NASA Is Very Mad-Astronauts Aren't SAFE to back on Earth...
On Wednesday, June 5, the Boeing Starliner spacecraft with two Nasa astronauts aboard ultimately lifted off successfully from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. This is considered an important milestone after a decade in the making.
At 1:34 PM ET on Thursday, June 6, the spacecraft docked with the ISS and officially became the US's second exclusive member of the space station, following SpaceX.
Bad News For Starliner! NASA Is Very Mad-Astronauts Aren't SAFE to back on Earth...
It's the time that the trio: Nasa, Boeing, and ULA were happier than ever. By then, X was bursting with countless congratulations for the mission's success. ULA's CEO got his tie cut after his "first people launch", a tradition usually after a flight director's first launch.
Nasa and Boeing could temporarily wind down after a very long time of being on the hot seat.
Jim Free, Nasa's associate administrator said in the Post-Docking News Conference shared that:
" the launch yesterday and docking today puts the Starliner on a path to certification to enabling continued exploration and science that benefits Humanity"
===
Subcribe TechMap: tinyurl.com/3z5ysrtf

[@morphshag]

I’m really surprised NASA rolled the dice on this one. They haven’t had a very good track record of ignoring failures. People tend to unalive.

[@keithscott1926]

I think NASA had to go with it to save face. 😡

[@daviddabling4602]

If Boeing doesn't understand what the problem is they might want to ask SpaceX to help.

[@redstoneranger1404]

Boeing: Elon, we have a problem. Musk: Hold my beer.

[@techmap9]

LOL 🤣🤣🤣

[@jeffsymons4535]

Those astronauts need to be returned to Earth by Spacex. I hope NASA remembers how cutting corners and taking unnecessary risks cost the lives of TWO shuttle crews.

[@kennethlee494]

As well as the Apollo 1 crew in 1966.

[@GatchamanG4]

So true

[@merlavery5057]

Space X will get them home safely. Starliner is lucky to have even made it into orbit , and we can't even reuse the damn thing , plus cost four times as much as the Crew Dragon . Scrap it , and build more Crew Dragons , and Star ships.

[@tedsmith4353]

What will they do with the ship at ISS?

[@DavidPirouet]

​@@tedsmith4353 the starliner can come back unmanned if it comes back safely then they've lost nothing but too much has been compromise already if it's as bad as it is now it might be safe but it's not worth the risk. If it comes back they could prove that it will safe enough but there's no reason to risk people on it!

[@tedsmith4353]

@@DavidPirouet And crash in to the ground? Will the air bags have enough gas to inflate? Not if a report I heard is correct.

[@robbodeeo1621]

Let SpaceX bring them back home!

[@PeterHonig.]

The Boeing Flatliner has been plagued with quality issues since the beginning. You would think that after being more than 7 years late, they would have fixed all the issues, but Boeing's quality problems has just gotten worse. Shutting down the Flatliner program is way overdue.

[@rogerrussell9544]

Before anyone dies.

[@clarencehopkins7832]

If starliner was an automobile the government would have an immediate recall. No justification exists for this starliner colossal failure.

[@DavidPirouet]

What they should do is come back on the dragon, they can test out whether or not the Starliner can make it back safely without any crew already there is too much compromise of planned redundant systems

[@dennisw8263]

Might I suggest that the first flight should be crewed NOT by astronauts , but by the supervisor of the quality control team!

[@techmap9]

[@edwardotto4053]

Well, we still have a Dragon upstairs to bring them home... Where can I bet that an empty Starliner capsule fails re-entry?"

[@RickTheClipper]

I remember the last 2 times, NASA knew about a small problem, did start and the astronauts perished

[@techmap9]

You are talking abt Shuttle's Columbia ???

[@RickTheClipper]

@@techmap9 Challenger AND Columbia, NASA does not learn

[@techmap9]

@@RickTheClipper it's so funny that they don't allow SpaceX to rescue Hubble due to being afraid of risk at astronaut's lives, but allow starliner to carry astronauts. What the hell are they thinking?

[@RickTheClipper]

@@techmap9 Boeing pays nice benefits. If the return goes wrong it is NASA, if it is successful is Boeings genius engineers

[@firefly4f4]

The grammar mistakes make this extremely hard to listen to. I agree with the main points, particularly about the thruster issues, but please give your scripts a few more passes.

[@frankharris3159]

The AI generated content and presentation is unbearable at times.

[@neilalexander2662]

The question is "Do you trust NASA?"

[@techmap9]

and your answer is....

[@philippostiglione2011]

I hope that ship is safe! The money is one thing, but astronaut safety must be most important important. Otherwise scrap the whole project and move on.

[@techmap9]

@@philippostiglione2011 I strongly agree 🤓🤓🤓

[@Scotty_AU]

NASA took a calculated risk, whether that's acceptable is open for debate

[@sonoftherepublic9792]

NASA needs to get out of the social engineering business and get back to space flight. Let the most qualified personnel do their thing.

[@40MileDesertRat]

NASA needs to get into the real estate business. The can't fly worth a damn. So renting launch pads and provided a place for the Space Force to hang a sign, may be their best hope.

[@dadearinto5546]

Rocket is complicated and dificulte Low safety and high cost We need somethings better Developing technologies to enable human access to space at dramatically lower cost and increased reliability #FeelFree

[@dadearinto5546]

Vertical lift off is dificult danger and very expensive This is the SOLUTION Will replace the wings AntiGravity Aircraft The Next generation Spaceship Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery can fly in bad weather plunge in the ocean even in outer space Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity? It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums: A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time. The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof. . . In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like. People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:

[@denniselvy3528]

Certainly not value for the money

[@ginog5037]

NASA is a joke today and a waste of taxpayers' money. Enjoy your DEI hires!

[@scottymoondogjakubin4766]

Either the module needs to be repaired in space or just discarded and another one to replace it ! Sounds like a job for spacex !

[@techmap9]

That's where Dragon come in 😎

[@fromtheouterverse]

I said when it launched that I wouldn't travel in it, it's Boeing, it's not safe.

[@stephensfarms7165]

No I don’t trust nasa after this. Boeing trying to save face, shame on you Boeing and NASA. I trust SpaceX over nasa.

[@notdone1975]

The astronauts should refuse to fly home on starliner and cut it lose

[@Frankthetank-zr5mc]

NASA is talking about how bad the leak can get be before risk. Wow. That’s not real comforting.

[@doglegjake6788]

It sounds like Boeing hired the CEO from General motors

[@donadams8345]

The thruster problem should have been solved by now. The Starliner cannot be docked for extended lengths of time at the space station with leaks and thruster problems, this limits what can be done with it. The reliability problem makes every flight a gamble. SpaceX has done much better for much less money.

[@techmap9]

😍😍😍😌

[@santa-johnenoch2625]

So sad! Shame on NASA! Shame on Boeing!

[@techmap9]

Poor astronauts

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Remove Boeing from all government contracts

[@meskes4059]

And yet people have the balls to say that it’s spacex who’s wasting money… sigh

[@BW12149]

Remember….everything is based upon low bid… it’s always about the money. NASA has lost 17 astronauts since 1967. Apollo 1 fire in the capsule (3), Challenger (7) 1986, and Columbia (7) 2003. The Challenger blew up at 73 seconds after liftoff because the O rings on the solid rocket boosters leaked, and there was a Morton Thiokol engineer pleading with NASA not to launch in the cold weather. The Columbia was damaged at launch as a piece of foam insulation broke off the main fuel tank and hit the left wing knocking a hole in it. NASA had camera footage of it but decided not to tell the crew. So these leaks in the thruster system aren’t a big deal? Well, we will see.

[@JeffHoneyager]

Have SpaceX engineer fix Boeing's problem.

[@techmap9]

SpaceX can help if NASA & Boeing need

[@bowlweevil4161]

@@techmap9 asking Spacex to work on that pile of junk would be a slap in the face tp Spacex

[@donovanSMMsvlog1583]

4.5 billion dollars mistake and I am piss. 1969 technology and this was the reason why they didn’t want the public to see inside star-liner until they had arrived. 😢😢😢😢

[@johncherish7610]

Even the astronauts are saying the Dragon is a much better and more advanced ship

[@NotThatBob]

Being = Yesterday's Technology Today.

[@techmap9]

What a pity for a heroic period!

[@GilbertoFerreira]

3:44 - two software fix? This reminds me 737-max and it infamous TCAS

[@techmap9]

[@ZIGZAGBureauofInvestigation]

I cant believe they Launched the thing. = MONEY Funding a Cash COW )o( to nowhere

[@johnnyhollis9977]

This should not be a white knuckle ride with fingers crossed event by now! All of these problems should have been sorted out possibly years ago! SpaceX if I recall correctly had a 100% successful collection of missions under their belt very quickly. I think the worst thing that has happened in the Dragon was a slight plumbing leak on the toilet! These problems for Starliner are not doing anything to boost confidence in this spacecraft to say the least.

[@techmap9]

Thanks for sharing your thought 😘

[@ghost307]

Elon should offer a rescue mission so that when NASA turns him down and the capsule brings back 2 dead astronauts the only one to blame will be NASA.

[@techmap9]

OMG

[@ghost307]

@@techmap9 At this point all we can do is hope that NASA's ego doesn't get anyone else killed, like it did on Challenger and Columbia.

[@user-mt8sd5xg8r]

I still think they should have dropped it, before now

[@dempoy]

Sounds like the same culture from the Space Shuttle program.

[@TheBooban]

They should only use Starliner for cargo until all the bugs are 100% fixed. Same glitch twice is too much.

[@techmap9]

Yeah. The human safety must be the most important

[@DavidPirouet]

​@@techmap9the problem with starliner even without people on it especially if it's with maneuvering is there it could be a dangers of the space station if it malfunctions!

[@davideberhardt4977]

Seals failing is a recurring theme with NASA. Remember the infamous seals on the solid rocket boosters for Space Shuttle?

[@thomasjess6131]

I've been saying that craft wouldn't be safe to re-enter Earth's atmosphere. They need to come home on Dragon!!!!

[@jroar123]

Send a cargo-loaded Dragon up and bring the crew back on the return. Do not use StarLiner as it has a good possibility of killing someone.

[@techmap9]

Yess 😎😎😎

[@dereks1264]

Boeing: "Trust us." Which they also said about MCAS. What a disgrace. I'd love to know what the two astronauts say in private about the spacecraft.

[@techmap9]

I will find more about this

[@jamesbaugh8001]

"...is a more systemic problem..." is a vast understatement. The entire corporate structure needs revision.

[@JuricksEnterprise]

But at least the door didn't fly off!! 🙄🙄 Time to trash the StarLemon!!!

[@techmap9]

I gets curiousity. Why called Boeing is Starlemon? Could u please explain it for me?

[@superspies32]

Not yet, the auto jettisoned door came after the stabilizing program become unstable

[@Spacebug23]

undock the JUNK from the space station and send it back with NO people in it!!!! Too many problems!!! I hope they are looking at peoples comments I would NOT Get in it Again send space x to get them home

[@oscarcrowe729]

Maybe you should have Elon Team look at the problem, I'm sure they can figure out the issue

[@techmap9]

Yes! SpaceX can help if NASA & Boeing need

[@Frankthetank-zr5mc]

They would troubleshoot, redesign, manufacture, install and test the fix in the time that Boeing takes to take the access panels off. We need to stop feeding the Boeing beast and support organizations that produce. Boeing is all about process. Space X is all about results. That’s the $5B difference.

[@ynchin6925]

Boeing's starliner and Space X's dragon are competitor. Do you think Space X will help their competitor?

[@Space_Debris]

The incompetence of the DEI before merit hires at all levels at Boeing has the company's future looking quite grim.

[@braxin8876]

Too bad politics will drive the certification process. Boeing has lost it's edge and I don't trust anything they make anymore.

[@johnsadler6534]

Bring them back by Crew Dragon!!!

[@techmap9]

Yeah!! But this will make Boeing become a joke

[@maddude3158]

Boeing don't know what's wrong because the guy who put the thrusters together who incidentally worked as a sandwich artist at subway might be cheap but no experience

[@johncherish7610]

DEI hires can't cut it as engineers

[@AgentPepsi1]

The Starliner has so many problems... You know, it was designed to go to the Moon - YET doesn't even have the abilities of the old Apollo spacecraft in terms of flight performance. Starliner is a complete disaster.

[@techmap9]

It's more disastrous when we put astronauts on it

[@glenngoodrich5244]

Deathliner's issues never seem to end.

[@techmap9]

"Deathliner" LOL

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Follow the money, something smells like corrupt government people

[@bowlweevil4161]

10-4! WITH JOE LEADING THE PACK

[@efrenplaza]

If you can junk space shuttle, you can junk this starliner before it kills!

[@overseer5660]

This is the opportunity for the dragon to shine.

[@techmap9]

Time for NASA regret its greedy decisions

[@bowlweevil4161]

dragon has been shining sence first flight, just ask those riding in it

[@WilliamBreitenbach]

AND HOW MANY MORE BILLIONS OF TAX PAYERS DOLLARS!!!!

[@techmap9]

[@mtn.homeforge351]

That thing reminds me of Columbia!

[@techmap9]

Sure

[@scoutdynamics3272]

"The O-Rings on the SRB's have never launched in this cold! We had partial burn through in warmer temperatures on previous flights!" "SHUT UP! Take off your engineers hat and put on your managers hat!" Foam strikes the wing on Columbia "Don't worry! Its only foam!" Now this thruster problem! "Oh! It can leak 100 times as much and it will be safe!" I'm waiting for "The rocket might blow up on launch!" "Who cares!? We now have an LES! Launch anyway!"

[@kb9gkc]

Boeing Junkliner.

[@Canoga_Knuckles]

at least the door is still there

[@techmap9]

And the bolts as well 😂😂😂

[@moodiblues2]

As far as I recall there have been four NASA types of manned spacecraft, Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, and the Shuttle. Plus many unmanned spacecraft, and one private manned craft from SpaceX that have attitude jets that worked or work flawlessly. Why can’t Boeing get this minor, but essential part working? Surely there are plenty designs available from which to choose.

[@3dtexan890]

Never had Atlas. Really LMFAO!

[@clarencehopkins7832]

How much time and money has been wasted on starliner . We The People want our money back .

[@techmap9]

Nasa likes to risk astronauts on the bullshit Starliner rather than risk Dragon on the Hubble rescue mission. Nasa has lost its mind

[@johncrumpley8702]

If it says "Boeing" on the side, make sure you double check the door.

[@dean8842]

If it says "Boeing" on the side, make sure you have a Double Indemnity clause on your life insurance...!

[@markjohnson5847]

Omg why is nasa ...still around...we have space X

[@pedrosura]

Because NASA doesn't build or design anything. It is like the Department of Agriculture or the Department of Energy. Do you know that the Department of Agriculture doesn't farm oranges or potatoes? Do you know that the Department of Energy doesn't built nuclear bombs? Did someone tell you that NASA builds or designs spacecraft? If they did, they were wrong. NASA is an government administration agency like The Department of Transportation. The only reason why people have NASA shirts and no Department of Agriculture shirts is that people like Space more than farms.

[@techmap9]

Nasa fears for his dominance

[@pedrosura]

@@techmap9 NASA is an administration. It is not a private company. NASA doesnt build anything. The Department of Agriculture is like NASA. They dont grow potatoes. They dont cultivate grapes for red wine. They administer. I dont think you understand or know what NASA IS??? Just Google it??

[@dja1353]

I don’t recon Butch and Suni are not getting these decisions forced on them. They are quite experienced and quite involved. If Starliner is indeed unsafe it will not carry them back. I think the thruster technology and system around them is in transition from what has been used in the past.

[@techmap9]

A positive news, hopefully everything will run like what u said

[@roger7341]

Things like that happen when students are given partial credit.

[@paulkoch9871]

If anything happens to these astronauts, Boeing should be sued out of existence and held legally responsible!

[@techmap9]

[@NATES84]

Helium is very hard to stop leaks . I hope they fix it once and foreverif they can get it home.Let a whole new Boeing crew take over the fixing with the old techs just advising .

[@johngalt6929]

Why is a robot reading the transcript?

[@surferdude4487]

Sounds like Chat GPT wrote your script and you used an AI generated voice to narrate. 0 effort. Thanks for wasting my time.

[@techmap9]

Why do you think so?

[@surferdude4487]

@@techmap9 Do you deny any of what I said?

[@user-bd8je6cb9z]

If anything system was not 5x5 , I am surprised they flew the bird with a feather 🪶 out of place...

[@bigdaddy-fk5bi]

GET THEM HOME AND GET MY FREAKIN MONEY BACK.

[@av_kovko]

The OMAC engines, unlike the OFT-2, have not failed yet, we will not know until June 17, whether there will be a supply of helium left for the operation of OMAC during undocking and landing. If not, then an emergency descent mode will be provided, due to the roll control engines. NASA has not discussed the use of the Crew Dragon spacecraft, the preparation time of the Dragon spacecraft will break the schedule of visits to the ISS.

[@techmap9]

Thanks for sharing

[@av_kovko]

And besides, sending the Crew Dragon spacecraft to rescue Suni and Butch, then postpone the launch of Dreamchaser to February 2025, and postponede GPS launch, Vulcan Centaur V004 relocated for Dreamchaser, Vulcan Centaur V002 and V003 priority for Dymmy payload and USSF-106, ULA more can not rescheduled these launches. Dragon Crew 9 may be postponed to December or January, in this case, and the Polaris Dawn mission will be postponed to autumn. SpaceX cannot reduce the number of Starlink launches, Starship is still far from perfect. The current Starlink constellation cannot be launched on Starship.

[@dean8842]

If it's Boeing, I ain't going...!

[@techmap9]

[@rudivandoornegat2371]

They had two uncrewed flights, so now the problems should've been fixed. The first crewed mission should've been a walk in the park. Now I hope the issues are so clear unsafe later in time, that at least the astronauts will be so scared that they don't want to return to Earth on this capsule. It feels like Boeing and NASA would rather gamble and play the odds, with the sacrifice of astronauts lives at stake. It seems better that the two astronauts stay a little longer on ISS and return with a crew dragon. While the Starliner can come back to Earth empty. But probably the astronauts are 'brave' and strap in the starliner in order to try to come back with a a defective capsule.

[@techmap9]

THanks for sharing

[@ghost307]

The problem with Boeing and NASA is that they can't spell. They don't know the difference between a 'crewed' mission and a 'crude' mission.

[@superspies32]

Space has no mercy for risks like this. Too many Cosmonauts and Astronauts died by neglect and reckless like this during Cold War. NASA should order jettison that capsule and order 1 emergency Crew Dragon for them. And while inspection process being done with Crew Dragon, Falcon 9 can launch enough supply for them and the station.

[@andrepacheco6067]

First let me correct you, this is really a re used spacecraft called the Apollo Command Module from the 70's. Starliner what a joke!

[@techmap9]

Thanks for doing correct me 😎

[@chuckaddison5134]

I disagree, Apollo was far more reliable than this abomination!

[@andrepacheco6067]

@@chuckaddison5134 Agreed and now they are stuck at the space station cause eight thrusters don't work! Talk about serious bad luck not only for the astronauts but for Boeing Co. as well.

[@andrepacheco6067]

@@techmap9 Can't wait for the Congressional investigations into what went wrong! A lot of heads are going to roll on this one!

[@floridadave53]

Prior to the disaster on Apollo 1 in 1967. Gus Grissom hung a lemon in the Apollo spacecraft maybe they should have done the same with Starliner.

[@eddawson9329]

"Worser"?

[@techmap9]

Could u please correct me? 😁

[@user-rx7hv3zi9g]

Koraci ka budućnosti moraju biti usponi i padovi Samo tako se napreduje,pobeđuje i odlazi u kosmos,👍😊🎉🚀

[@joesolis2]

It would be bad for Boeing if Starliner failed and Space-X had to launch a rescue mission.

[@techmap9]

That's better than exposing the astronauts to danger

[@joesolis2]

@@techmap9 Definitely true.

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Not another taxpayer penny to Boeing

[@donraptor6156]

All to Musi to fill his pockets huh?

[@RoBear-xo6zw]

Thank you for making this video and putting all these ducks in a row… Even Suni, commented on their having a “problem”, prior to docking… when she was giving the tour of the Starliner after docking to the ISS… I guess her dance was not a strong enough statement 😂🎉 The robo voice sucks. I usually delete anything with robo voices, but you have the story I have been monitoring since the scrub… I subscribed😂

[@techmap9]

LOL, thanks a lot for motivating me 😅😅😅

[@RonP-ut3cr]

Were Boeing more money we’ll fix it. I mean it’s just doors falling of the 737?

[@baxtermullins1842]

It has massive redundancy!

[@RobertRavoalavoson]

And how massive is the issue?

[@harrymarker7436]

There is no excuse acceptable for the helium leaks. The system should have been pressure tested to 200% of design pressures and then a leak down done afterwards. To allow this craft to have gone to space is CRIMINAL!

[@winfordnettles3292]

Just another failure point that NASA ignores. Like Challenger, like Columbia, so goes the Starliner.......

[@techmap9]

That's terrible

[@RichardLucas]

I don't know if it is true, but I have read that if a company loses quality control, they can't get it back without starting from scratch, with new humans. The humans will resist any changes to process and resent those changes, even if they are complaining about the quality of their own products out of the other side of their mouths. I assumed the passenger jet and space projects were entirely separate, and if they are, then the rot is very deep at Boeing, being able to cross into two entirely different processes at different locations. But we would predict this based on how long Boeing has been sucking the government teat and how many execs have security clearances. It just kind of is what it is and there's no hiding it.

[@techmap9]

I've heard that Boeing has changed its CEO but sounds like it doesn't work. How do u think?

[@ghost307]

@@techmap9 Unless the CEO was involved in each and every design decision, it won't work. Middle Managers will protect their bad decisions to save their worthless jobs.

[@markjeghers4408]

Dump Starliner and put all the money into Dreamchaser, especially the human rated version

[@calvinclubb1804]

Space Shuttle loss 😢 now Starliner. SpaceX is a proven system.❤ Get rid of Boeing.🎉

[@techmap9]

👍👍👍

[@Egill2011]

The leak ...

[@techmap9]

So sad

[@arthurhamilton5222]

For the first time in history there are four main transport spacecraft in orbit. The the Chinese shenzhou, Boeing Starliner, SpaceX dragon and Russian soyuz.

[@user-jq2rf4nf3o]

Closed Captioned - Crude vehicle ? Wow about Crewed Vehicle = Computers just aint cutting it

[@otiebrown9999]

Bad luck!

[@rickmunn7356]

Boy I hope you’re all wrong and Butch and Sunny make it home safe. But a also feel your concerns. Crossing fingers in not sound engineering but if it could help I’ll cross everything in have.

[@techmap9]

I also hope that I was wrong, bro

[@arthurhamilton5222]

The spacecraft problems are in the one trip service and propulsion module. NASA and Boeing have made adjustments. The return will be ok. Boeing and it's contractors will have to use premium products in the next build service and propulsion module. From what I read on other forums, Boeing have had bad relationships with some of it's contractors. NASA is going to have to force Boeing's hands with the contractors. Hopefully, Blue Origin buys ULA and the Starliner program.

[@harpleblues]

When have we seen this before?

[@WyoSavage1976]

They had huge balls of steel for them to glo up in the Starliner,

[@The1976spirit]

ESA service module with Starliner would work. ESA succeded with Orion, Starliner should catch up.

[@dalesmith924]

Between the lack of accurate information to the poor AI voice over, these are the WORST videos.

[@Reloadeez]

You Tube is implementing AI disclosure rules soon. All videos with AI voice over, art, and creation have to disclose it in the title of the video. It can't come soon enough.

[@chance4luv]

I agree, I wish we could block channels. I watched the Starliner launch from the cape. It was beautiful!! I love Suni and Butch. So tired of this butt hole being completely negative towards everything they do. I like the launch and re entry suits much better than the creepy dragon suits as well. I watch space things so these videos show up in the feed and now that I know they only say bad things about Starliner, I don't open them except for comments.

[@DavidPirouet]

Stockton Rush

[@victorhoe2321]

My take is that Boeing is a public traded company and therefore have more requirements for transpancy.

[@stephenwood9703]

But they hide everything and as the FAA have discovered lie about things, and that's only in the commercial aircraft side of the business, imagine what must be happening in the space division where they have burned through all the money they were given 7 years over due are still having issues, they are pushing for certification for one reason only, the money fawcett gets turned back on.

[@user-gc7zt5cw3x]

I’m at a lost, NASA will do anything to support Boeing! I pray the astronauts will be safe! It amazes me that there is no concern for the lives of the astronauts!

[@techmap9]

[@jamesnicholls9969]

the way this is going SpaceX will have finished all 14 crew missions before Starliner does its first crew mission

[@cbgardenmaryland]

The section with these trusters are is discarded and burns in. How many were built with bad trusters?

[@BobbyTB425]

Yet we went to the moon in 60's😅😅😅😅😅