Battle of the Jets: Dassault Rafale vs Eurofighter Typhoon 2024

[@felcofb4750]

This video it is full of errors.

[@andrelockridge9109]

6:00 mica air to air missile is carried by the Rafale.6:05 Typhoon has the 27mm cannon,the Rafale has a 30mm cannon.

[@jean-Pierre-bt8xw]

For french rafale, there is a better missile : the Meteor, the actual best long range air to air, by far...

[@gillesbourgeois5348]

​@@jean-Pierre-bt8xw they said in this video that the typhoon was equipped with meteor.,,which I thought was a french missile. Anyway, the rafale is especially the only fighter that has a aircraft carreer version.

[@NATObait]

@@gillesbourgeois5348 MBDA METEOR is a joint project from many nations Germany's decision to reduce its intended acquisition resulted in the UK taking 5% of the programme from Germany, giving the UK 39.6% and Germany 16%. France is funding 12.4%, Italy 12%, and Sweden and Spain 10% each.

[@unknowncommonman]

Honestly, Anybody looking to buy an European combat jet , Dassault Rafael is clearly gets the job done and is easy to acquire where as acquiring Euro-Fighter Typhoon requires permission and payment to four different countries and diplomatic work required behind it is a really a hassle not just to purchase it but also for its arms , maintainence and spares along with waiting period of them off spares, technicians and engineers as well which is why UAE which bought Euro-Fighter Typhoon still bought Dassault Rafale as it requires less work diplomatically as they only have to deal with one country only.

[@KamBar2020]

Make BAGUETTE Great Again 🥖

[@unknowncommonman]

@@KamBar2020 I would love a well baked baguette.

[@NATObait]

@@unknowncommonman the payment method is simple ( just like MBDA Meteor missiles) but you need to organise training/service back up so you choose a partner like Germany for Austria or UK for Saudi Arabia etc . As to parts supply the UK has managed that better than Germany who save money by not ordering anything ( their choice ) so have poor availability the same goes with their submarines . German sanctions on Saudi Arabian orders is the biggest reason not to buy from a consortium that includes them hence France will have that FCAS ankle chain and ball to drag around.

[@BraLin99]

Right so diplomacy decides which JET is better now? 🤡

[@NATObait]

@@unknowncommonman Practicality is the difference. Why buy from a consortium that has a flip flop partner that has a reputation for vetoing sales. Purchase a FCAS FREE package instead called Dassault.

[@-TheP-]

France went solo ... because its needs comprised being able to operated on carriers and others did not care, alongside with other reasons. EuroF is structurally not capable to do that, it would break at launch. History is repeating with the SCAF and germans making unreasonnable requirements. Honnestly I don't understand why we collaborate with them, we don't have the same needs.

[@NATObait]

The SCAF has two reliable partners in Spain and France and one guaranteed to sanction sales. The divergence of France in the original European aircraft collaboration was mainly due to the insistence on it being cats and traps carrier capable. Germany wasn't interested in that, Italy, Spain and UK all had AV8B. The insistence to use French engines and Dassault to have overall charge was never going to win universal approval. Sadly a chance to build a better cheaper solution was missed.

[@denonba]

2:30 You meant Germany, right?

[@mehdidjemaa5972]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 américan géographe

[@ninjalanternshark1508]

AI has a long ways to go if it still cant tell between Poland and Germany. (This videos on this channel are 100% AI creations, you aren't going to get a response to your comment from the creator.)

[@gillesbourgeois5348]

​@@mehdidjemaa5972 I was thinking same

[@tinman3586]

The Rafale just seems like a better all around aircraft than the Eurofighter. I don't think there's really anything the Eurofighter can do that the Rafale can't. But the Rafale is way more flexible and is a good navalized strike aircraft rivaling the F18E/F Super Hornet. It can even operate along side the Super Hornet on US carriers.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

In the air superiority and intercept roles the Eurofighter is superior by a significant margin. And it’s set to overtake the Rafale in most other regimes with the planned P4E finally allowing it to make use of its entire AOA range. The difference isn’t so great though that it couldn’t be offset by pilot skill or luck.

[@joshafc41]

The Typhoon has a much more advanced radar than the Rafale and superior air to air perform in all realms. The radar is twice the size as the Rafale and is capable of a much larger azimuth, scanning ranges and electronic attack. Even the mechanically scanning radar had a longer range than the Rafales AESA. In air to air the typhoon is a lot more capable simply because of it's performance and radar. For air to ground there isn't a weapon the Rafale has that the Typhoon doesn't have an equivalent for except nuclear.

[@danythedog7908]

@@joshafc41 Typhoon a2sa ?

[@joshafc41]

@@danythedog7908 what do you mean?

[@danythedog7908]

@@joshafc41 Does the Typhoon have an A2SA radar (I believe it is at the end of its design phase but not equipped at the moment)?

[@dominique4700]

I am French and I find it abnormal to glorify one plane over another. These are extremely powerful planes with their specificity. Originally, they were manufactured according to specifications specific to each country. Even if one or the other stands out thanks to a particularity, I find it stupid, a Frenchman will find his plane better than the other and that of an Englishman better than that of his neighbor. Each plane has its particularity. What must be remembered is that in the event of a major conflict, the two countries will be together with very good planes and that is the main thing

[@SuperChodot]

Exactly, it's like buying a laptop I presume, always about what you need and how much money you have 😂

[@NATObait]

Dominique, A balanced view that deserves all our respect.

[@dominique4700]

@@NATObait merci

[@alexandermoursiotis1465]

With all due respect but the rafale is far better option considering the versatility ,the electronic warfare suite and the radar plus the fact you only need to deal with France instead half the European union😅

[@NATObait]

@@alexandermoursiotis1465 🤡Shame on you for spoiling a good post. 🤡

[@aidanmacdougall9250]

Both to replaced in 2050 by battery powered models to be wef compliant! 😂🤣😂

[@KamBar2020]

Make BAGUETTE Great Again 🥖

[@BOKIBACKA]

Kod nas Avioni idu na Kiselo mleko ili Koprivu i ekonomično je nezagadjuju!

[@moodogco]

U had Poland pointed 👉 at Germany on your map 😂😂🤷‍♂️😂😂😂🤦‍♂️ the polish will love that

[@sylviemanson9761]

Nukes are the Big difference , the 4 countries that built the Typhoon had to buy F35 on top just for the Nukes ! The Rafale can operate from an aircraft carrier (the tiny French one or the US's big ones). Fun fact, did you know that "independance" was a French word ?

[@didierjacob250]

60% de mots d' origine française , latine dans l' anglais, terminant par " ment " age" "ion" "or" " able" "our ".....flagrance, élégance, alliance, distance.............

[@NATObait]

Italy is a Tier 2 partner and the UK is a Tier 1 partner in the F35 programme hence they unsurprisingly bought them. I think the UK has the nuclear bit covered with it's Trident missiles. The Rafale that can operate from a carrier are only 43 aircraft and the rest are not capable. UK and Italy both have F35B for their carriers and they can fly from US Marine Core carriers as well as the USN carriers. Japan is now F35B capable.

[@sylviemanson9761]

@@NATObait The Trident is a SLBM (Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile) I thought we were talking about planes. Anyway the Trident II is another US based tech. 43 is enough when you have only one carrier. Don't Start me on the F35B.

[@NATObait]

@@sylviemanson9761 the ' had to buy ' countries could have bought Rafale but why buy second best. Switzerland, Finland and Norway all chose F35 over Rafale for a reason. Don't get me started.

[@sylviemanson9761]

@@NATObait Ok, you got me I'm French ! Sooo, I'll take "second best" as a compliment, especially comparing the developing budget price of the F35 with the Rafale one. I could go over the reasons so many countries bought the F35 but i've a more specific question for you. Why would countries with a real, immediate, touching border threat, buy the second best ? Namely, Egypt with Israel, Greece with Turkey (another NATO member)and, India with China/Pakistan. NB: The F35B is a pricey, fragile, unreliable, low availability Frankenplane with no range and no payload, countries are forced to buy when they haven't any CATOBAR AC.

[@MadX8]

I'm French and I love the Rafale, but this Typhoon bashing (from French I mean) has to stop. They are both great aircrafts with different qualities. Let's just enjoy the chance we have to have them both on the same side

[@BraLin99]

You uneducated people just don’t seem to understand that they are different jets built for different purposes of course they’ll be different, they are both great options. You can go on about the Navalised Rafale but the UK only decided to ditch a navalised Typhoon in favour of the next-generation navalised aircraft. Educate yourselves first before you comment out of bias. The French have created their own great aircraft and have a strong airforce they can be proud of but you can’t deny the Tyhoon is just as good just not designed as much for electronic warfare.

[@HazelBonilla-ub4kj]

L'Eurofighter a perdu toutes les compétitions face au Rafale et même dans la supériorité aérienne ou le Typhon est sensé être le meilleur, le Rafale le surclasse. Pour dire les choses vraies, non l'Eurofighter n'est pas un avion multi rôle puisqu'il a été conçu dès l'origine pour faire uniquement de la supériorité aérienne. Le seul avion au monde qui peut être défini comme multi rôle est le Rafale car il est le seul a passer d'une mission à une autre sans avoir besoin de rentrer à la base pour changer sa configuration, il peut tout faire en passant d'une mission à une autre tout en ayant l'allonge la plus importante pour frapper n'importe ou sur la planète.

[@bobbybawbager]

Well, yegh, that's a maby!! But in reality, the French will always surrender before they have a chance to use the Airforce 😂😂😂

[@worldwanderer91]

I think the proper term would be "omirole".Also, the Rafale is more commercially successful with more export sales than the Eurofighter and even beating out American competitor jet fighters

[@KamBar2020]

Slava BAGUETTE 🥖

[@Solveig.Tissot]

​@@bobbybawbagerAverage Virgin Cringe Brainless Fatherless Anti France Troll Fanboy taking Copium over here ⬆️

[@gregorydecamps5689]

​@@bobbybawbagerc'est intelligent ce que tu dis 👍!!

[@michelayad9479]

Le Rafale a 14 points d’emport et l’eurofither 13 et le rafale à toujours défait l’euro lors de confrontation car il a une avionique largement supérieure à l’euro avec plusieurs années d’avance

[@pranavgandhar4604]

Germany 🤡is vassal of US, It's not only about jets , France has veto in UNSC . If you buy US jets , you buy problems too, if you know how Australian F-16 was grounded by the US .also US blackmails you for their political interest!

[@NATObait]

Rafale has 14 hard points for its expensive and limited weapons

[@honeybadgerbomb4469]

​@NATObait Its limited weapons, which include American, British, French, Israeli and Indian weapons!

[@NATObait]

@@honeybadgerbomb4469 if you can integrate Storm Shadow/ Scalp with Tornado mounts onto a SU 24 I guess you could fit many weapons, but Dassault won't recommend that and French weapons suppliers would cry.

[@sylviemanson9761]

@@NATObait why cry when you can sell more ?

[@jean-loupdesbordes4833]

Those are two good planes with one better than the other. Nowadays with late long range air to air missiles and radars, air superiority doesn't mean much as well with the canards placed where they are on Eurofighter the pilote can't see the soil witch makes it difficult to use for ground combat and last but not list the Rafale has a marine version that works either on catobar and stobar carriers. Eventually the only real multirole is the Rafale. The difference of price is not significant.

[@glennridsdale577]

The price difference is significant! You wouldn't be saying that if you were paying. Rafale M is irrelevant to all export customers except the Indian Navy. Your claim that Typhoon pilots can't see the ground is simply absurd. The restriction in view is minimal and in any case the pilot simply banks, JUST LIKE A RAFALE PILOT. Only F-35 and J-20 pilots don't have this very minor limitation.

[@NATObait]

@@glennridsdale577 both aircraft had design choices, Rafale needed safe low speed handling for carrier use hence close coupled canards and less angled wings this reduced speed but gives better weapons loadout so not a bad thing. Eurofighter has canards much further forward from the centre of gravity that gives transonic manouverability. The difference in the aircraft is often simply what you bolt on to the airframe or when you upgrade systems. Eurofighter has greater ability in interceptor role with height, speed and transonic performance. Rafale has a massive advantage with it's ITAR FREE package. While EFT has it's veto loving German partner . Weapons choices on Rafale are it's week point compared to EFT ( and Gripen ) being limited in choice and double the price in most areas. I see marginal benefits on both sides not distinct clear advantages.

[@Netscape-kd6mg]

the Rafale isn't multirole it's omnirole. there's a difference. a multirole has to RTB to change configuration when an omnirole doesn't.

[@NATObait]

@@Netscape-kd6mg Omnirole is just a marketing phrase as it can't land on water like a Catalina flying boat or hover like a harrier also Super Hornet is more Omnirole as it has a 2 seat carrier version and a Growler type ( it can fold it's wings too ) . I can't think of any modern military aircraft that has to return to base to swap missions. It is easy to reconfigure in flight providing you have the correct weapon type. That's why you often see mixed loadouts on missions. You would not see a Rafale with a mix like an Exocet , a nuclear weapon and a Scalp and Meteor. A much more simple switch is normal and often weapons can alter g loading so typically 5g maximum is normal.

[@Netscape-kd6mg]

@@NATObait not exactly, a multirole has to have it's avionics calibered for the mission. an omni can do that much more simply that a mulktirole

[@Delkomo]

Struggling to find half a minute in this video without errors.

[@gandigooglegandigoogle7202]

there is not even a start to the match...the Rafale crushes the Typhoon in all areas...it has also won all international competitions.

[@robertscholl5858]

The Eurofighter does not have 27 hardpoints (13 is correct) and calling them internal is something that doesn't apply to both aircraft. Maybe to F-35 or F-22, since they have internal hardpoints that open only when the missile is fired. Also the map inaccuracies...this channel doesn't seem reliable as a proper information source

[@BOKIBACKA]

Unutrašnje tvrde tačke ima SU.47 SU.57 i SU.75 a Mig.41 će imati sve unutar tako da će biti jedini pravi id 6 generacije! A Kina ima J.20 unutar malo treba gledati.

[@bhromur]

I think they also reversed the armaments, it is the Rafale which can be equipped with MICA missiles, not the Eurofighter. Scalp and Stormshadow are the same missile, Scalp is the french version and Stormshadow the british one. Etc.

[@7up-dp1kk]

Yes. The biggest difference between the two is the price per flight hour, Typhoon close to 50K€ per hour when Rafale is 15K€, this explains why Rafale was sold to Egypt, Qatar, India, United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, Croatia and Greece. The design of the air intakes explain why Rafale can carry double it’s empty weight, when Typhoon unfortunately cannot, far from that. All major armement have to be carried under the wings, on the part close to the body of the plane, which greatly limits the payload for air to ground. At the end, the choice of the canard… Rafale has the canard a bit behind for 1 major reason: the canard helps maintain the vortex on the extrado of the wing, ensuring a continuous lift at slow speed. This is crucial for maritime operations on aircraft carriers, for tactical landing on short runway or for dogfights. It provides better visibility for bombing operations. The canards of Eurofighter are used for… better lift at high speed high G manœuvres? The real great thing in the Eurofighter is the thrust of the engines, but as mentioned above, they are very expensive to operate.

[@jansedlak8505]

​@7up-dp1kk Yes, Rafale can technically carry more payload, but in practice, it's a different story. When both aircraft carry 2 under-wing fuel tanks, EF can take up to 4 large air to ground weapons while carrying 6 AAM's. Rafale can carry 3 large caliber air to ground weapons and 6 AAM's. (Rafale also can't use anti radiation missiles.) Typhoon also has a wider range of targeting pods and an ultra wide cockpit display. Rafale still uses old 3 smaller monitors setup from early Gripens and F16E block 60.

[@7up-dp1kk]

@janse The Rafale can perfectly use a anti radiation missile. Thing is anti radiation missile are not in French arsenal. For a good reason, they are not efficient. 1 hit per 300 US anti radiation missile shot against Serbia was anything but impressive. As far as payload is concerned, the eurofighter Typhoon has a structural issue that simply can’t be solved, it is the air intakes position that make the center body of the plane unable to carry bombs. Where is the central bomb 1t bomb or large tank on EF? Nowhere. For a good reason. We see from time to time unrealistic picture from the marketing service of the consortium. Convincing nobody, especially not buyers. Cheers

[@chandrachurniyogi8394]

both the Dassault Rafale F-4R multi role air dominance fighter & Eurofighter Typhoon GR4 multi role interdictor strike fighter has proven to be quite a success . . . inspite of their modest sales figures . . .

[@-TheP-]

Several mistakes : EuroF has 13 hardpoints and a payload capability of 9000kg. Rafale has 14. Rafale M has 13 and a payload capability of 9500kg, more thant its own weight.

[@honeybadgerbomb4469]

Rafale M is a chunky gal, she's over 10 tons For other Rafale variants, such as the B, if you exclude fuel that is true

[@NATObait]

Rafale has a top speed of Mach 1.8 Eurofighter has a top speed of Mach 2.35 Rafale is capable of a height of 52,000ft Eurofighter height is 65,000ft. Why is this important? If you launch a Meteor from a higher speed and height it will travel 30% further and at a faster speed.

[@metalmadejohn7287]

Exocet ? Magic? Where are these incredibly good missiles for the Rafale?

[@syfury3403]

Magic is too old, replaced by MICA IR better in every way (range, manouvrability, resitence to counter mesure)

[@NATObait]

Mica is good in both versions but only medium ranged and expensive. France need a HARM missile equivalent and MALD decoy. Gripen and Eurofighter can fit cheaper alternatives and wider options. That doesn't make Rafale look worse but it has limitations in weapons choices. The Rafale should be AMRAAM and Sidewinder capable if NATO stocks are ever needed.

[@NATObait]

Q. " we have done the evaluation so which should we order? " A. " we don't want to place an order and get left high and dry by flip flop German sanctions " " O.K. let's scratch Eurofighter Typhoon ". That is how conversations go around government tables.

[@KRYPTIA-mp4ol]

Meteor missile is mainly used by the rafales, but also used by the euro fighters too (the latest version of euro fighters)

[@greekcracks687]

Bro mixed poland with germany 😅😂

[@spacekhan6924]

Can't even point Poland on the map. I'm out of here 😂

[@user-xq8vv7pq6j]

Terribly poor video. Typhoon HAS NOT been ordered by the UAE, Turkey or Poland. Rafale doesn't have the sales handicap of the German government, so is available to customers off limits to Eurofighter. And Rafale isn't the newer aircraft with a newer engine at all: in fact they were developed at very much the same time, but Rafale and its M88 were a few years ahead. That was because the production Rafale is development of Dassault's Rafale A technology demonstrator (and hence a little more conventional structurally) than Typhoon, which is a clean sheet design. AESA has been available on Typhoon from late build Tranche 3 aircraft (first delivered to Kuwait in early 2021). Your lazy reporting yet again parrots the "Typhoon for air combat but Rafale is multi-role" nonsense. Both were designed to be multi-role from the outset, albeit the earliest Typhoons were only A2A capable on first delivery: you are literally 20 years out of date. Yes, Rafale has a "unique" EW system (Thales SPECTRA) but so does Typhoon (Praetorian). Rafale has a slightly longer range, mainly as a result of its (subsonic only) 2000 litre drop tanks: Tranche 3 Typhoons are all equipped for conformal fuel tanks, but not a single customer has bought them, suggesting that range simply isn't an issue. Typhoon does have important advantages in air combat of course, being designed specifically to reliably defeat any projected "advanced Flanker" (i.e. at least 3:1 against Su-35); Rafale will do well to achieve parity against the Russian fighter. Rafale's great selling point is the French government, who really will sell it to anyone - even Serbia!

[@Jamirio]

France could sell it but they already make money with Airbus instead they will maybe sell the Eurofighters (Germany) and refurbished mirages, it's a strategic weapon so they can't make money out of it the same for US who restrict sales of advanced tech only to their closest allies/partners, in fact no one want to sell their best arms & weapons as risk zero doesn't exist ...

[@glennridsdale577]

@@Jamirio France makes absolutely none of the Typhoon. Not so much as a single bolt. There's no way they would ever support a Eurofighter marketing campaign. It's an insane notion.

[@Jamirio]

@@glennridsdale577 They don't support the Eurofighter marketing campaign... there is many demands for Dassault from other nations in order to modernise their military fleets but they actually don't have any fighter jet to sell at the moment...

[@denonba]

Internal hardpoints?

[@billcook7483]

Any Adverts lasting more than 30 seconds or featuring rap music will be skipped .

[@etiennegiroux9146]

Rafal is much better as it can be used on aircraft carriers.

[@ruckzuck5544]

ja und Kaffee kann der Eimer auch kochen

[@ИСТИАКМОРШЕД]

I just watched both comparison videos from 23 & 24 there is significant difference in narration of both of these videos so which one is correct?!!

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

The Eurojet EJ200 is a significantly more modern and capable design than the Snecma M88, and the fact that the video suggests otherwise indicates poor research. The EJ200 boasts fewer compression stages (3 LP, 5 HP vs 3 LP, 6 HP), higher thrust-to-weight ratio (9.17 vs 8.52), higher pressure ratio (26:1 vs 24.5:1) and higher thrust (60/90 kN vs 50/75 kN). It also has a war setting allowing for 69/95 kN with 102 kN emergency thrust as well as an upgrade path allowing for 72/103 kN by replacing a single fan or 78/120 kN with a more extensive upgrade.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

As for weapons, the Eurofighter has 13 hardpoints, the Rafale 14, the Eurofighter has a 27mm cannon, the Rafale a 30mm one. Both have access to the MBDA Meteor, the current greatest BVRAAM, as well as a diverse array of other air-to-air and air-to-ground systems, with the Eurofighter having more options, including the current top ranking IIRAAM in the IRIS-T, but no nuclear option.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

When it comes to radar systems the state-of-the-art Eurofighter *variants have the advantage as the ECRS has a larger aperture and more and more modern TRMs as well as a wider FOV.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

For now the Rafale has the advantage at low speeds and in terms of payload capacity. It’s also carrier capable. At higher speeds the Eurofighter takes the win. With the upcoming AMK upgrade it will also outperform the Rafale in terms of payload capacity and flying at lower speeds.

[@philv3941]

@@RichelieuUnlimited Not sure of this one for the Block F4.1 version.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

@@philv3941 F4.1 is a Rafale F3R with software updates, isn’t it? All I‘ve written should still be applicable.

[@amitkumarsur5899]

The map of India shown in your video is faulty. Make sure using proper maps in your video.

[@yannrateau5439]

There is a mistake regarding weapons, Rafale is using Mica, Scalp and meteor missiles plus internal 30 mm canon and Typhoon Amraam and storm shadow missiles plus Mauser 27 mm canon

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

Both use Meteor. It’s the weapon of choice for all Eurocanards. Scalp and Storm Shadow are also essentially the same thing.

[@fxdx68]

what battle?? Rafale so much better.

[@phoenix42300]

Weapons have been switched ;)

[@didierlemoine6771]

Both r very good to protect Europ :)

[@TheRideBo]

Gripen, Gripen, Gripen. No doubt in my mind.

[@thomasbousquet7871]

This video is clearly biased. Each mistake in what is said leads to wrongly favor Typhoon However conclusion is right : both aircraft have their own strength : Typhoon is a bette air superiority combo. Rafale is the only true omnirole fighter and it has an edge on any other jobs.

[@andresimon5654]

…at 2:38 you show Germany saying it is Poland.

[@jammiedodger7040]

BAE is the biggest partner in Typhoon.

[@jabsdrahm.3232]

Eurofighter... replacement for English Electric Lightning

[@eliaskaram2325]

I don’t see any reason why you need to spend 100+ million on an aircraft if you are a small country with zero hostile neighbors. You can literally get 2 F-16s or 2 JAS 39s for the same price for one Typhoon, Rafale, or F-35 Btw, you started the video saying both are multi-role fighters then later said the Typhoon is an air superiority only. Which one is it? Lol

[@FasilMeressi]

How do you rate those two jet in relation to the Russian Su-35. Why are these two jets more expensive than the Su-35?

[@unknowncommonman]

Research and Development cost , Labour cost and Raw Material cost in Russia is much lower compared to Europe but along with it, The quality of Russian engines is in question from a long time since the cold war era. Now Russia is able to catch up the West with its Turbo fan engines for jets but again they are in their prototype stages only since 2 years their really competitive engines should go to production by now.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

Both have the range advantage over the Su-35 due to their significantly lower RCS and more advanced sensors as well as the Meteor missile. The Russian R-37M may boast similar or possibly greater maximum range, but its a larger and heavier missile, resulting in a lower effective range against maneuvering fighter sized targets compared to the Meteor. On top of that, the Rafale and the Eurofighter would likely be able to launch on the Su-35 before it can spot them in turn, negating any hypothetical range advantage the R-37M holds.

[@unknowncommonman]

@@RichelieuUnlimited R-37M holds a range of 400Km from launch to target, it is good enough to take down any plane as a pilot can't a missile or plane from that distance bit detecting it from radar or missile approach warning system could be tricky depending on from which angle the middle is coming and what is it's speed. As per Turkish Intelligence Ukraine lost one of its F-16 to this missile while intercepting Kamikaze drones.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

@@unknowncommonman It supposedly holds such a range, the record against another fighter is at a mere 177km, against a plane with at best rudimentary missile warning sensors. The maximum range is the range of a missile fired at optimal launch parameters against a compliant target. This shrinks down to a fraction, if any factor is less than optimal. To launch a missile a plane also has to know that there are bandits in the area and have at least an approximate idea of their location.

[@unknowncommonman]

@@RichelieuUnlimited Considering that Interceptor aircrafts, Air Superiority jets and Flankers are usually flown when a threat is detected rather than reconnaissance missions it is safe to say that they knew there's an enemy aircraft there in that location in that trajectory.

[@TontonTotoDudulle]

2:30---- Poland in Germany, return in school please.

[@matttranquart7763]

Hum Poland is far bigger than thought...

[@ozanjst]

EuroFighter is better air to air fighter and has better radar.

[@exonys3838]

2:30 wth ? That’s Germany bro, and poland never bought typhoon or intended to

[@Izmael1310]

2:30 Poland LOL shows Germany :D Poland is liittle bit to the right brother!

[@watz6962]

so manny wrong information mixed up.....27mm Mauser cannon at the Rafale ?? not

[@elrulio9889]

rafale dont have a 27mm mauser canon xD

[@MrStrat01]

Rafale is omnirole fighter. Period.

[@benoitrabozzi6908]

Wow, mistaking Germany for Poland in the map.

[@exonys3838]

Guys, this video are just false information for 9 minutes straight, this Guy don’t know a shit about what he is saying, and you can see it when he place Poland on Germany (Poland did not showed interest in the typhoon either) and talked about the Rafale while showing typhoon videos

[@lukaszzienkiewicz8898]

Fuck sick. The map of Europe looks bit different. Poland is not Germany. Besides Poland ordered f35 and is considering buying more planes. f15ex , more f35 or Eurofighter gr3

[@nby149]

I thought India too had ordered the Rafale…

[@The_Unknown_Smiley]

India has ordered Rafales and already has them delivered. If memory serves correctly, they got 36 of them with further more about to be ordered since they liked the jet very much

[@ak-rx1ui]

27(!) hardpoints on the Typhoon? (The Super Hornet has 11). Go easy on the juice, bro😅

[@bo2web]

Cold-war : German super maneuverability / French tactical versatility. France has always needed catobar jets. Typhoon intakes doesn't match.

[@yan4594]

Between 100-120 million dollars per unit, versus 138 millions per unit which is less tgan the rafale…

[@NATObait]

Both aircraft have negative sides like Eurofighter having a flip flop veto loving partner in Germany that lost a Saudi Arabia order. Many countries that could not buy F35 due to US sanctions opted for an ITAR FREE package from France. Eurofighter was not ITAR FREE. Remember only less than 50 Rafale M are carrier capable the rest are not. F18 have sold 2000+ of all types and all are carrier capable. SPECTRA is much vaunted but Germany, who are partners in the FCAS with France, are not buying that system but a SAAB system based on AREXIS for the EK and HARM missiles. The Rafale F4.1 does not have 2 way data link to weapons or a repositioner on its radar that has only 838 TRs.

[@andresimon5654]

…and you also mixed up armaments between the 2 jets…

[@Ben__S]

Lot of approximative informations here...

[@ErikMyde]

JAS 39 Gripen will crush both Dassault Rafale Eurofighter Typhoon every day in a week.

[@jabsdrahm.3232]

From a road

[@rognock]

Brother, that is not Poland…

[@polateld]

Poland 🇩🇪

[@modernmountaineer]

Extrrnal hardpoints not internal.

[@IchigoSK8]

You said Poland on the map it's the germany lol

[@MrChanakkale]

la polonia non è la germania.......dateci sotto con la geografia

[@Kolokotronis1924]

Omg Poland is invited Germany ? When did this happens

[@moonknight8693]

What ever but they can't stand against 5th gen f22 and f35/ so nations should stop wasting money on 4.5th gens.

[@Paul-fp4ux]

The Typhoon looks a bit like a bastard, inspired by both the Rafale and the F-16, just uglier.

[@damienmoreau6991]

ChatGPT a fait cette vidéo

[@nomad_grj]

terrible video. so many mistakes that it hurt my brain watching just the first half of the video. dont make videos if you dont understand a topic properly. ok?

[@RaySqw785]

50m per typhoon lol Thzy even just started to test thier first typhoone aesa, far to be operational if bough! lot of datas are false, anyway nice attempt lol

[@joshafc41]

The first AESA on the typhoon has been operational for years with Oman and Kuwait. Which was just an evolution of the Captor M. Similar to what the French did with the Rafales RBE2 radar. Nee AESA front end and the same backend which was originally engineered to be upgraded to an AESA. The only difference being the Typhoon AESA is more capable because of it's size and mechanical gimble capability that allows it to scan more of the sky abd over come AESA deficiencies. The typhoon AESA that just had it's first flight that you're refering to is the ECR MK2 which is a new development of an advanced GAN based electronic attack capable radar exceeding the capabilities of even the F35s APG 82 radar.

[@ruckzuck5544]

Leute ,haltet doch die Klappe wenn ihr keine Ahnung habt . So machst du dich nur lächerlich .Trotzdem netter Versuch .

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

@@joshafc41 Actually the ECRS Mk0 already outperforms the AN/APG-81 of the F-35, at least based on detection range statements made during development, indicating a range of 300km vs 1m^2 target vs the officially 150km (probably 200km) of the F-35. It’s also possible that the ECRS Mk1 entering service in 2025 will already utilize GaN instead of GaAs, based on the fact that Hensoldt has been producing GaN-based AESA radars like the TRML-4D for years and that the Mk1 will utilize new TRMs. Add in the gimbal and it might well be superior to the upcoming AN/APG-85 of the Block 4 F-35s, at least in air-to-air. The Mk2 is exploring a mix of GaN and GaAs for cost reduction, with performance improvements likely being related to the new backend.

[@themashofstealths]

This video Is an absolute MESS. What an incredible embarrassment of a production. 🤦‍♂️

[@patriotasrbija]

Russian Su -30SM2 much better than bout of them...About Su-35 SM better not speaking....

[@AttackTheGasStation1]

Russia sucks. Serbia sucks too.

[@emmanueldoucet8793]

😂😂😂

[@aidanmacdougall9250]

Given up on Russian vs American then, Russia always wins 😊

[@Laddi_Singh994]

😂

[@Zwsss-w8l]

Agreed!💯

[@zenon7094]

Russia always wins? The Russians have not won anything in the past two decades.

[@thierryfromgwada9312]

The Typhoon is ugly. Period.

[@moodogco]

The typhoon has been constantly updated since entering service infact the uk typhoons getting major mid life update as we speak with new radars so the fact it entered service slightly b4 doesn't mean anything tbh especially unlike u said it is a multi role jet

[@sukhdevsinghrawat9707]

Biased report. Rafale beaten F16 and F15 so it’s good in air to air combat too

[@fraserconnell21]

Rafael is great and the Hammer and Hammer er are bit ding doing too. But Eurofighter has more powerful engines and its latest AESA radar is boom dawgy ding dong. Eurofighter also has dynamic self protection. Perhaps Rafael has one too but I'm honestly not sure of its effectiveness. 🫡💥🤲

[@pranavgandhar4604]

Germany 🤡is vassal of US, if US wants they can ground eurofighter too It's not only about jets , France has veto in UNSC . If you buy US jets , you buy problems too, if you know how Australian F-16 was grounded by the US .also US blackmails you for their political interest! France is also in west, but they walk differently than Germany and UK

[@philv3941]

Rafale is equipped with the SPECTRA autoprotection suite, with full set of jamming, radar signature reconnaissance, dynamic lurring including custom lenght lurring ribbon cutter. The IR OSF allow him to search with full passive mode too. Rafale is Aesa equipped since F3R, but with the F4.1 and GaN tech the new radar of the ER is not much ahead

[@joshafc41]

@@philv3941 The Rafales radar is limited by its size, power and limited azimuth. These are physical limitations that can never be overcome due to the size and design of the aircraft. For context the Rafale has a smaller andn less capable radar than the Gripen an aircraft several tonnes lighter than it. The Typhoons radar is double the size of the Rafales and mounted on a repositioner which brings major tactival advantages in both offensive and defensive applications. It just makes the aircraft a whole lot more capable.