BBC - They're at it again, hiding another presenter inquiry!

[@JoshDoughty-y8q]

Americas got Diddy, and we have the BBC. Peas in a pod.

[@willdraper8384]

I haven't paid TV license for 11 years now and never will again.

[@Let.ThemEatCake]

so ur a paying avoider

[@Skate-Steve]

24yrs and no pedo and fake news tax here either, anyone who still funds the depravity needs an iq test!

[@remaglive]

The BBC needs to be dissolved. With the advent of technology, there opinions are no longer needed. TY

[@Hew.Jarsol]

Yet people still pay these lot a TV Lie-cence!

[@NBMedia8928]

They've not had a single penny off me for at least 12 years and never will.

[@eileenpritchard9154]

Same here.💯👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

[@adenwellsmith6908]

I'm not paying a penny. Lets have a 30 million inquiry. That just accelerates the end.

[@barrypos55]

CPS .....Couldnt Prosecute Satan.

[@RobertTrombley-g6l]

All started at the bbc with johnathon king,people forget about him.

[@marydaniel3252]

Jimmy savile!!

[@garyrobinson6247]

£3 million of license payer's money wasted. Investigation should be by an independent body, not the bloody BBC.

[@Let.ThemEatCake]

oh stop u lot are all nuts

[@Del640]

Counduct? They can’t even conduct their own orchestra(s) without spending millions!

[@dave1secondago]

i see people in shops throwing there money at the bbc and the tv licence , if u tell em about the bbc , they take no notice and carry on paying , why

[@stananders474]

I feel really really really feel guilty for paying the BBC licence fee for the past 55 years. I've paid for peados for years. May God forgive me.

[@charliesmithers7663]

you only have to look at him & the way he talks. wrrrrrrrrrrrrrongun

[@philomenaellard5997]

Who is he please

[@judithkeane5551]

This is why they want us to concentrate on Gregg Wallace. He is just a sleazy man who makes dirty suggestions. I have never heard of this Westwood person? But the full truth needs to come out about Huw Edwards

[@AndyH-13]

It’s okay as the public will cover the cost of the investigation with the recent license increase.

[@raminybhatti5740]

Tim Westwood the Ali-G type individual? He's 67?!? Wow, time flies.

[@truckerfromreno]

Send him to max security. He loves all that.

[@mred7030]

bbc the new bud light ?

[@terrywuckfit3393]

The BBC did hold an inquiry into Huw Edwards, it was suspended while the police investigation was ongoing but resumed mid July this year completed at the end of that month. As for Tim Westwood, although not currently sub judice the police will ask for information to be withheld from the public domain if the likelihood of charges being preferred is high...

[@MarkGould-e6j]

A year ago this October I saw Tim Westwood in Lanzarote sat on the next table

[@heli-crewhgs5285]

Why don’t you say ‘…in October 2023…’? That way your comment stays relevant for ever.

[@carolynellis387]

Never heard of him

[@JohnfromTroon]

Tim ‘ll fix it

[@martinlove7073]

😂

[@ic3358]

Tim is (was) a gatekeeper for the hip hop rap scene in the UK !! Tim was educated at the highest level (like they all are ) his dad was a priest at Peterborough so it’s as it usually is not a rag to riches story!!! He truly is a wrong en !!! Just like they all are !!!!

[@Wilkins_Micawber]

Subjudice in criminal cases starts when a suspect is arrested. As the file is with CPS it is safe to assume Westwood was arrested at some point, the rule takes immediate effect.

[@markogden9289]

😁👍.

[@deanpartington792]

What happened to the top sports presenter that was arrested and covered up??? nobody knows who he was!

[@Leonwhu73]

Young bloke at sky?

[@johnwinter5597]

Who is tim westwood?

[@Let.ThemEatCake]

this bloke is a mad conspiracy nut

[@mrwhite292]

Ooh

[@gerardpeterbrennan]

Do you not understand how contempt of court, and indeed justice works? Court of public opinion is not justice. In order to have a fair jury trial the evidence should be presented in court and in court only, where it can be properly challenged. Anything else will risk prejudicing any future case against the individual, and would make it impossible for a fair trial to be held. This would likely result in the individual getting away with it, because if a fair trial is impossible the presumption of innocence takes precedence. So if the BBC published their report the likely outcome would be that no justice would be possible, the individual in question would get away with any crimes committed, and any victims would not recieve the justice they deserve. There is no conspiracy here, simply the proper functioning of a justice system. You can argue that justice is coming far too late, and this would be a valid complaint. But this is not in any way specific to the BBC, nor are they any better or worse than anyone else in this respect. We've seen worse in Christian churches both Catholic and Protestant, for example. This problem is one inherent to any hierarchal system, where those with power over others will unsurprisingly wield it, and abuse of such power is inevitable and is inevitably covered up. If you want to end this problem, the only way to do so is to stop allowing some to have power over others.

[@mrc-by4vp]

british bull crap