Before the Big Bang 6: Can the Universe Create Itself?

[@Ryutix]

How did existence itself come into existence. This thought genuinely gives me anxiety

[@jonathanjones770]

Why can't existence be eternal and therefore neccessary?

[@patrickkirby7612]

I'm starting to believe that it is not necessary to be concerned about time or other factors that humans possess. We've learned by nature that everything has a beginning and an end because of death & other things. However, we overlook the big pic that even on earth, everything cycles over & over infinitely as far as we know. Forget expansion & theory. The earth and space/matter is a repetitive cycle by large so why apply our small minded physics and principles to such a large scale..for what? Bragging rights? Clever conversation? Material for education? There's no pattern. There's no alpha or omega. The universe, it is obviously bigger than size itself. There are no and is no limits. We may just be the tiniest atoms or particles of something much bigger than we're able to imagine. Our universe of billions of galaxies is just the tiny piece of dust on Selena Gomez's little toe and omg would I love to find enough rocket fuel to make it to her perfect lips and smooch her for eternity. Err well her foot is fine I suppose.💗🦶

[@aidenstern5254]

The absence of anything is inherently unstable

[@triggabun]

I thought of this a couple of nights ago and almost had a crisis lol. Then I threw my hands up and said "f!ck it, that's above my pay scale". I honestly don't know how these scientists don't lose their minds. I will be so happy if aliens ever come to earth because it will be their problem then. I feel as though there are some things above our comprehension. That's why Jesus said those who labor come unto him, he also said he was feeding us bread because we were not ready for meat. He figured we were not ready and just following his simple rules would still get us to the end safely without understanding it all. Our brains are not big enough. In our limited understanding things must have a beginning and an end. We cannot even imagine anything beyond that.

[@plsbuffme5470]

COULD WE CREATE OUR OWN LITTLE MINI BIG BANG IN ORDER TO CREATE OUR OWN LITTLE UNIVERSE? PLOT TWIST: WHAT IF BEYOND OUR UNIVERSE THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE US BUT VERY VERY GIANT AND OFCOURSE VERY SMART WHO CREATED OUR UNIVERSEBY CREATING THE BIG BANG?!(WE'D BE INVISIBLETO THEM WITH THE BLIND EYE TO GIVE U AN IDEA OF THEIR SIZE)

[@onbored9627]

When I was in 10th grade I read his book "Time Travel in Einstein's Universe" (J. Richard Gott), and was absolutely blow away. It took me a few read throughs to really grasp it. I remember asking one of our physics teachers about it. I said "Hey, I'm kind of confused about these cosmic strings, I don't quite understand what these are exactly." and he just replied "You aren't supposed to" and walked away. Me and my friends just lost it laughing. He noped out of that conversation so fast. ahh.. good memories.

[@onbored9627]

@@MichaelxRHS Very true, some things are only conceivable in a mathematical context (so far).

[@markpeterson3220]

A wonderful and profound lecture of immense intellectual interest. Thank you. Princeton’s Richard Gott is a great teacher.

[@PhilHalper1]

he is indeed , thanks for your comment

[@AnnoyingMoose]

"What (Stephen) Hawking says in his book The Grand Design is the universe exists because it needed to exist, and because it needed to exist, it therefore created itself. His conclusion merely restates his premise, which means his argument is circular. Nonsense is nonsense, even when spoken by famous scientists." ~ John Lennox

[@jasonspades5628]

How do you prove a pen works? You use it to prove it. This is also known as the problem of induction. John Lennox? We are talking about someone who an atheist because he was mad at God (which would mean he was never an atheist) and became a theist when he saw where the Jews were murdered. That doesn't make sense. Your strawman argument you described from Stephen Hawking is both cute and adorable. But you didn't repeat Hawkings argument or theory. You repeated the shortened version of the shortened version that was shortened down for readers like yourself. Even I cant understand his full equation and I study theoretical physics. And I'm damn good. I understand about 10% of Hawkins work on both Hawkins radiation, and his origin hypothesis. But you dont understand enough of science to understand the Theory, and you don't understand logic enough state your argument.

[@mayal5206]

@@jasonspades5628 - Wow ... you really embarrassed yourself there.

[@JeramyRG]

Nonsense is a human construct based on a local representation of what we witness. It bears no weight on the truth reality bares. Technically speaking, the earth being round was nonsense. To our senses, it was flat. Your blind comprehension is of no regard to the answer of the most complex question ever to plague mankind.

[@jasonspades5628]

@@mayal5206 Oh wow, good rebuttal. I never thought about that!

[@jasonspades5628]

@@JeramyRG Of course "Nonsense" is a human construction. "Sense" is a human construction. It is the result of the Information we receive from our "senses". But we usually use the term "nonsense" as a colloquialism. Because something can be false and make perfect sense. Like the story of harry potter.

[@uueaouaueaueau9243]

I like how at 10:40 the interviewer starts nodding like he has ANY idea what he's talking about.

[@JeffMcDuffie72MeridianGate]

I like how the nerd women is smashable.

[@ok-kk3ic]

Jeff McDuffie / Just had the sane thought. Something about the way she speaks.

[@charlesbrooks9577]

He doesn't

[@HarryNicNicholas]

lol, i'm sure we all would.

[@247tubefan]

The Universe went through a hell of a lot trouble to bring your eyeballs 👀 to watching this KZbin video.

[@Omar92Canada]

🤯

[@garystevenson5560]

We are advancing towards the past for we come from the source of all universes, the Great Conscious Void. In this way it is said in the Great Book of Life that the beginning of all beginnings is the end of all ends. Thus looping in this way the multiuniverse becomes more and more paradisical. Eisher aisher eisher and Alif Laam Meem are letters only God knew the meaning. Eisher is Jesus aisher when he is not there and eisher is when he returns as Ailf Laam Meem.

[@martinzitter4551]

@@garystevenson5560 ~ Please avoid confusing thinking about science with believing religion.

[@CaptWesStarwind]

Of course a giant eyeball would say that.

[@triggabun]

And I don't appreciate being dragged into this madness. Lol

[@joalberici258]

I've spent a lot of time in physics because it interests me but this is still way over my head! He had me until he started talking about vacuum states and then I had to whip out trusty Wikipedia. It excites me though, realizing how much more there is to learn

[@thebadace1]

It’s exciting yet depressing knowing we may never have an answer

[@rav8149]

13.19 - the question of first cause still exists. What put that system into place in the first place?

[@AhsimNreiziev]

I don't think you understood what the term "closed time-like curve" means. It's a *loop* . Where is the beginning of a circle? It has neither a beginning nor an end. Well.... okay, it sort of has an end when it splits off to form the main Multiverse Trunk. But it certainly doesn't have a beginning. That's because it's circular. But maybe a year's worth of thinking about it has led to more understanding where there was less before?

[@rav8149]

@@AhsimNreiziev But, how is it one of 'laws of nature'? Why is it a law and why is it the way it is? Why should a closed timelike curve exist in the first place? Something HAS to begin I would assert. Because if it doesnt, why does it not?

[@strangequark420]

Dude's suit is awesome.

[@PhilHalper1]

Richard Gott often jokes its from the future.

[@typingcat]

Did you just assume his or her gender?

[@ajhproductions2347]

It’s like a freaking zoot suit!

[@2ndAveScents]

In a Dumb and Dumber kinda way

[@Constantinesis]

And it matches with his eyes color and the whiteboard text.

[@zet0korp]

Reminds me of an old acid trip where I was deeply convinced that I already lived my life countless times because the universe was somehow on repeat... pretty scary thought if your life s not great. Funny thing, I started making a lot of changes in my way of life since then, thinking "if it s going to repeat again and again I might as well make it worth living"... how many times did i think that before...?

[@crasheffort]

It's nice to see Harry Anderson found something to do after Night Court ended.

[@surreygeorge11]

I thought I was watching Matlock PHD

[@stella6516]

Lol

[@AussieDad79]

I’m quite proud of myself. I lasted 15 minutes before i gave up hoping that I might understand at least something. I’m not even sure if the hat doesn’t go with the suit or the suit doesn’t go with the hat.

[@kennygroth4938]

I think it's alright. The hat is alright.

[@Gartendalf]

i didnt know there were people that can get that close to explaining this on camera. awesome! searching for this for years now! finally FOUND IT! yaass!

[@PhilHalper1]

Glad you did, enjoy.

[@VeronicaGorositoMusic]

People can't still realize that time is not a thing, but a result. We have matter, and matter in movement is what we call ''time''. Matter for itself can't be. Only when it moves in any direction, generates the ilusion of ''time passing by'' and so then, existing, being. Because it moves. Stop the matter, and you ''stop'' time. That's hypothetical, you can't do that practically, you are matter in movement also. So no way to stop time and observe it disappear from the equation. In theory yes, we are living in the same stop moment of the Big Bang, with the difference that matter moved a lot...but we're in same full stop, eternity, but because of matter in movement, we perceive it as ''time passing'', from back to the future (those two doesn't exist). Time is not the speed of light itself. All matter can't move that fast. Only fotons can. But fotons are a part of all the matter. Maybe I'm partially or fully wrong :)

[@rickflare9077]

Time is not a thing

[@ClassicRock1973]

I think you're right... That's very smart. It's obvious that if everything stopped, time would stop

[@Helloverlord]

...actually, this is best explanation of time-matter I've heard.

[@pound4pound380]

Their is no such thing is time. Only living organisms experience time.

[@32brookse]

See my recent reply on the main thread. To expand on what you are saying. Time does not exist - it is an abstract mental concept for measuring the rates of physical interactions of particles, not a thing. So it cannot be traveled through.

[@jsmcguireIII]

The universe created humans so it could experience self-awareness. I wonder if it has any regrets.

[@ClassicRock1973]

Good point.... We ARE the Universe observing itself, since we are made out of the most common elements in the universe. It's very poetic

[@thefirsttime7759]

The univese dont think, it just does

[@Kuzyapso]

@@thefirsttime7759 that sounds human to me

[@Prince-gu8or]

@@ClassicRock1973 that's beautiful never thought of that FUCK ponder that going to sleep

[@2asseddog]

Just one, this guy's theories.

[@9870321654]

In 20 years there will be a mirage of that guy in the skies going AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!

[@tomschmidt381]

I find your videos intriguing. I must admit I don't completely understand the implications of these pre-big bang hypothesis but I'm amazed scientists are able to postulate them given the bizarre nature of quantum mechanics. Gives me hope for humanity. Hopefully you will be able to create many more of these thought provoking videos.

[@PhilHalper1]

We will try, thanks for your kind words.

[@schmetterling4477]

Quantum mechanics is only bizarre to you because nobody explains it correctly and those false explanations are clashing with the ideas you were given about classical mechanics, which, unfortunately, are also partially false.

[@247tubefan]

It's Turtles 🐢 all the way down.

[@daryljonesfoster4102]

I like turtles 🤫

[@JudoMateo]

247tubefan this time it’s mathematically devised turtles so it’s scientific. The scientist seems kooky to me though.

[@b.griffin317]

@@daryljonesfoster4102 they satisfy the palate, but not the mind.

[@HarryNicNicholas]

there's a tortoise snuck in about halfway down.

[@agonlata4748]

That rise of intonation at the end of each sentence makes me go back in time and prevent his birth.

[@HarryNicNicholas]

he *is* your father

[@ronjon8674]

Darn you. Now I can't stop hearing it.

[@Omar92Canada]

Finally! found something more complicated than my ex-gf

[@Playerofakind]

Lies

[@patrickkirby7612]

She's only a problem once a month right? Just know when a lady starts flipping the fk out that its that time of the month and just start crying with her, she'll recover much quicker give YOU the best bj instead of your best friend. Simple.

[@Netanya-q4b]

BWAHAHA +1

[@markmartin3152]

Impossible, perhaps you couldn’t perceive the totality of her complications. Thought being that women can be either the worst or best thing to happen to us as men, or it’s just a designed cosmic joke on us. BTW if you’re a woman, you’re currently living in the greatest time in history for women.

[@ronaldsanchez1341]

Finally I understand the confusion I'm in...

[@a.meireles.boxing]

Someone just clicked : "Start simulation"

[@unxnxwn1798]

A. Meireles - Boxe/Boxing my thoughts exactly.

[@chevon1920]

Ok fine then who invented that “persons” universe????

[@Magnesius]

@@chevon1920 we did...

[@nonames3198]

@@Magnesius what Is shall be and what shall be was

[@7come11two]

I love this guy in the green jacket. The dry erase marker he used on the board matches his suit.

[@charles-y2z6c]

Yeah, the hat makes sense to when you see his younger picture that he is a cue ball.

[@mawage666]

I'm only 11 minutes in and this is like the greatest video of all time.

[@josephsmith3908]

I kinda like the white hole theory that our big bang was the other end of a black hole and it would kinda look like a mandlebrot effect or a mc Escher painting

[@loudvoice8933]

THE "THEORY OF EVERYTHING" IS LOVE. THAT'S IS HOLD 'THE ALL IT IS' TOGETHER.

[@Kyssifrot]

Good thing that my neutrons, electrons and protons do love each other so much, I couldn't hold myself together else!

[@crazy8sdrums]

As an object goes faster, its time goes slower. At the speed of light, time stops. Distance over time is how you measure the speed of something...and X divided by 0 = an infinite value. Is Light an object, and how fast does it go? If time stops at the speed of Light, c, and Light moves at the speed of Light, c, and time stops at c then clearly Light has infinite speed. Somehow, in our own perception, Light has a speed less than infinite. Ponder that as your Universe unravels.

[@serijas737]

I don't get it.

[@crazy8sdrums]

@@serijas737 That is OK. Most don't get it.

[@serijas737]

@@crazy8sdrums Is that some info only one with 9000 IQ can understand?

[@crazy8sdrums]

@@serijas737 No. It requires only critical thinking skills and the ability to think independently from those that try to program you. It is an enormous Universe to explore, but some want to confine you to a very tiny box and make you feel insignificant to the point of nothingness. When some authority figure tries to tell you that you are just a tiny, insignificant blip on the screen you should reject them.

[@serijas737]

@@crazy8sdrums You could just explain it in an easier way. I don't understand what you're talking about but it's really interesting to me.

[@VocalMabiMaple]

I'm learning astrophysics from a cowboy. I like that

[@PhilHalper1]

Me too

[@user-nu1sj1gk8q]

It's disturbing

[@loopymind]

with a remarkable sense of fashion...

[@southernbreeze3278]

Must be Europeans...........don't know the difference between a cowboy and a hillbilly

[@VocalMabiMaple]

ky le must be European, doesn't realize that cowboys are just the cream of the crop among hillbillies

[@-Postoronnij-]

Can I read this information, in the text? I don't know English very well, and the subtitles don't translate very well.

[@PhilHalper1]

Im not sure what you mean sorry

[@-Postoronnij-]

@@PhilHalper1 I wrote simple phrases, yes through an online translator, but what is not understandable in them? It is difficult for me to perceive information from the video, including due to my poor knowledge of English, so I asked - is there such information in the form of text, articles, to read, not watch? That is exactly what I wrote.

[@PhilHalper1]

@@-Postoronnij- ok there will be a book coming out next year I hope follow this channel and more dettials will rise

[@PhaktTheIsolationist]

Good to know the world of physics has a Bird Lawyer.

[@SeanMarc]

Over my head. What now?

[@frankpergola7501]

Omg lmfao that was good

[@Enonymouse_]

@@SeanMarc They are referencing Harvey Birdman, attourney at law apparently. :)

[@whydoesthisexist4170]

This is an incredible analysis on how the universe is created. Well done!

[@DadsCornerLew]

178% more confused after watching this than I was before.

[@HarryNicNicholas]

give it time. :)

[@plsbuffme5470]

BEYOND OUR UNIVERSE THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE US BUT VERY VERY GIANT AND OFCOURSE VERY SMART WHO CREATED OUR UNIVERSEBY CREATING THE BIG BANG?!(WE'D BE INVISIBLETO THEM WITH THE BLIND EYE TO GIVE U AN IDEA OF THEIR SIZE) Do u get it now :) ?

[@johnchesterfield9726]

But now you’re confused on a higher-level

[@michiganmademusic6744]

Cause they’re using theories from their imagination, if they were 100% true, it would be a scientific law and provable, law of thermodynamics contradicts all of this and that’s a scientific law. Things go from order to chaos and matter cannot create itself, nor can energy.

[@johnchesterfield9726]

@@michiganmademusic6744 You sound like a creationist nut. Are you?

[@luiszapata7791]

Beautiful documentary

[@buddcort4183]

Relativity with a Kentucky accent! Awesome!

[@cnaude]

bogen broom Do you even know what the word "theory" means in science? Judging by the amount of flat earth and other conspiracy videos you watch and like I wouldn't count on it.

[@stevenpreston5943]

+Charl Naude Don't worry, He believes in the THEORY of flat earth........ An Obvious idiot.

[@atomatlas5595]

Budd Cort SPACE COWBOYS!

[@slowburntm3584]

You can't say that faster than light travel allows traveling back in time because no matter how scientifically advanced we get the cosmic speed limit will NEVER be broken. So why even hypothesize what would happen when it isn't a possible situation.

[@zethloveless7238]

Slowburn it’s not so much traveling faster than light as it’s just connecting two points in space via Einstein Rosen bridge

[@slowburntm3584]

@@zethloveless7238 My point exactly. So why do people always talk about faster than light travel? If I take a shortcut to work and arrive 20 mins sooner it doesn't mean I traveled any faster during my trip, just a shorter distance.

[@zethloveless7238]

Slowburn because you would arrive “faster than it would have taken light”

[@slowburntm3584]

@@zethloveless7238 That is the first time I have heard that explanation and it makes sense if that is what they meant when saying "faster than light" travel. Though, I don't think that is what people mean when using that statement.

[@zethloveless7238]

B Smith space itself will outpace light. Imagine running a race and the track keeps getting longer while your running.

[@LuisAldamiz]

I would never have thought that a guy wearing a suit the same color as his eyes could articulate such an erudite, yet fresh, understanding of the universe. It's a pity that, because of the cuts, sometimes we lose perspective of what must have been a fascinating conversation but I do envy his students, what a mind!

[@20july1944]

Luis: How does the "time loop" get started? No matter how many subsequent loops may occur, it starts at a point in the loop.

[@LuisAldamiz]

If you go back in time, the future starting point has not yet happened, right? So which is the beginning? More so when I believe we're talking about quantum level stuff, which is weird in many aspects, including the conjecture that "all photons are the same photon" ("all electrons...", whatever), which goes forth and back in time (but goes back through other space, so we don't see it)

[@LuisAldamiz]

"Get started" is a question that does not have meaning in a time loop, only in linear time does. I know it seems paradoxical from our viewpoint, which is trapped in linear time (with only tiny relativistic distortions at most) and in which causality is important and "logical" (causal) but in a time loop causality must be circular ... and in a universe with an inverted arrow of time, what for us is the future, for them is the past: there's no particular reason why time must be "vectorized" as it is in our universe. In fact the role of space and time gets reversed inside black holes, where the space is the one "vectorized" (towards the singularity), so everything towards the event horizon is always sort-of-past (but in space). It's very weird, I don't even have the proper words nor the understanding, just a general idea, but time is not at all different from space ultimately, so there's no particular reason why it cannot traversed in different direction as ours, making the "future" to be the "past", the "consequence" to be also the "cause".

[@LuisAldamiz]

Anyhow, why did you ask me that question when I did not even talk about that, just praised Gott?

[@20july1944]

Luis: I assumed you praised Gott because you agreed with him. I think Gott is incoherent because a CTC has an initial point like anything else, and I think I see the flaw in his logic: time is *indeed* relative to the observer/experiencer but that means that a CTC doesn't *explain* anything even if it exists. From the POV of the "first particle" that goes through the loop *first,* and is joined by 535 times as many the next time, it is *not* a time loop, but a racetrack that the first particle has now negotiated for one complete time.

[@DrAL00isin]

So matter and energy can’t be created or destroyed, the law of conservation, and now the universe can create itself. No beginning and no end, well that clears it up.

[@dabonemarrow5337]

He's brilliant, and super funny!! Great expression of learning. Great show!!

[@dabonemarrow5337]

And the narrator is super hot!!

[@PhilHalper1]

thanks

[@MicrobyteAlan]

Mind blown. Seriously. Thanks

[@PhilHalper1]

Thanks

[@rotflolextreme]

Its not the past though..its always the present. The past is relative, and it cannot be recreated, youd have to reverse the entire universe.

[@neo.616]

Excellent

[@davidkelley5382]

So with all we know about the nature and speed of photons, your saying there is an agreed to now?

[@grr194302727385]

Evidence???

[@lordofthewoods]

@@davidkelley5382: Well, there was... 3 months ago : )

[@randycarstens1100]

Uncle Billy went to Alaska with a friend in his RV, he thought at first it would be nice to have someone to talk to. After his friend talked nonstop from Seattle to Vancouver Uncle Billy turned to him and said, "don't you ever shut up?" 200 miles of blessed silence.

[@surreygeorge11]

We tend to think of things as having a beginning and an end. The concept of infinity is baffling to grasp. If time had a start, what was before? Where does it all end? Infinity is the one question we can never find the answer for.

[@georgenewitt8685]

Love this channel. Really makes you just sit back and appreciate everything

[@PhilHalper1]

Thanks you so much, really appreciate the comment.

[@kurdtacolbain731]

4:13 There was a young lady called Bright who traveled far faster than light. She left one day in a relative way and returned on the previous night. 😆

[@Ericatheinspirer]

🤔🤷🏾‍♀️🤣🤣🤣

[@kurdtacolbain731]

@John Mitchell he didn't say he wrote it.

[@jonathanmain9079]

So when you are having fun.. why does time seem to speed up...?

[@TheSWolfe]

Thx, Prof. G. Now I've got "I'm My Own Grandpa" looping in my head!

[@dColorOfBoom]

It's not funny I know, but it really is so

[@theodorli3840]

All videos mentioned above are so interesting

[@LividImp]

Listening to this guy is like if Gomer Pile got hit in the head and was suddenly a genius.

[@tarlcabbot6880]

Roflmao... good one.

[@tyrasmith6477]

We are definitely inside the black hole bubble universe. With many dimensions of black hole bubble universes. There are many golden eggs

[@bigtone7824]

As long as I'm in the Universe with red heads I'm good

[@HighestRank]

Big Tone the omniscient universe shifts you into the lower hair-energy zone at the wishes of its conjured holographic brain.

[@christianlemelin9862]

She's hot

[@vellasdad]

hot sex hair

[@toniomalley5661]

Big Tone thank you nice to know someone appreciates us

[@user-kb1pj7iu6j]

He's right! I've seen this in a dream, expect more tubes and they were contained within a sphere. It was a surreal experience, I'm not sure how to describe it, I just knew and said aloud in my dream "I'm looking at the structure of the universe". It made me wake up and I still think about it a lot. This is some amazing confirmation. Create the same graphic contained within a sphere and that was my dream. Crazy!

[@Gavriel-og6jv]

52:01 Add 3 more branches and you get the biblical menorah.

[@mariamery5197]

I don't understand from 14:02 to 14:32. Could, please, someone explain it to me??

[@PhilHalper1]

If spacetime can curl back on itself then groundhog day is possible. Does that help?

[@clintoncut]

Super interesting ideas. I wish Gott and Li luck in their journey

[@PhilHalper1]

Cheers

[@nitefly-music]

For us people at the moment it looks like time is an important dimension. Time is not a important dimension but a gauge to measure energy to mass transformation which is not an instant occurance

[@Ron84tOrr]

Ross Geller on physics

[@PhilHalper1]

Ross from "Friends"?

[@GetPucked]

Well that is the only commonly known Ross Geller right?

[@PhilHalper1]

The only one I know, but i couldn't grasp what he has to do with our videos. Maybe I just dont get the joke, sorry.

[@sunsetshimmer305]

I'm so glad someone else thought this too, sounds just like him XD

[@geoff7936]

Haha, so true! I was already scrolling through comments when I heard his voice come on, and I was like whaaaat?!

[@AncientXxC]

I learned in uni that backwards time-travel is simply impossible as you´d be breaking the second law of thermodynamics. Entropy works unidirectional. Any feedback?

[@aldiboronti]

I'm not seeing a scientist with a hat on, I'm seeing photons that look like a scientist with a hat on.

[@NlHILIST]

Best explanation I've heard to date. And that is one great hat he is wearing.

[@PhilHalper1]

thanks

[@tjasont1]

Eric Moore 48 minutes ago Jason martin You are utterly stupid Jason martin Jason martin 16 minutes ago @Eric Moore Well my friend fortunately this is one question that eventually we will get to know, and find out who was right and who was wrong. What you got to remember is everything you believe is just something some guy told you. At least somebody thought what i believe was important enough to put in one book. I think that you are the one who hasnt put enough thought into this. Anyone who thinks this universe and life araised by chance just dont know the scope of what they are saying. Would think a Intel Core I7 would just materialize by chance if i left a lump of silicon alone for a few billions years . Because there have been lumps of silicon left alone since the beginning of creation and yet no I7 fossils have been found. Then ask yourself how something millions of times more complex materialized by chance. Take life for instance I challenge you find any state of the art lab right now in 2018 that can take non living elements and construct totally from scratch one living cell. Not modify already living material. Not use crispr to inject a mutation into it. You cant because they cant even today. But yet they teach you some rock water soup got stuck by lighting just happened to mix together and make life. Not only that but DNA cant exist outside of a cell nucleus UV is deadly to Genetic material AKA SUNLIGHT so the Cell wall the complete Genetic code with with the correct genes for metabolism, reproduction, and cell processes, and the cell organelle all just formed in the same exact Nano meter at the exact same time not only that spaced just perfectly instantaneously all at once. These things couldn't have evolved because they all must be there at once for life to exist. Maybe Your the dumb one sir well maybe not your just a good sheep lead by blindness or Narcissism to think that nothing greater than yourself exist its almost not you fault. People have just forgot how to think and really look at whats being show to them. All you know is me, I, nothing beyond yourself. You can believe some mentally handicapped guy in a pimp suite if you want dont worry we'll all see in the end If the pimp suite was right. You know the best way to hide the truth distort its meaning and turn it into a lie. Then hide the key and leave it in plain site. Jason martin Jason martin 2 minutes ago So please lay down the exact proof and outline for how the universe truly began and The verified proof on how life actually began and prove me wrong I lay that challenge at your feet. If anyone thinks my rock water soup Idea is not what science teaches then I also challenge you to look into abiogenisis. Read for your self the best minds in all of human kind have been able to muster. It is what i just said some chemicals on a sterile proto earth with the horrible conditions for life, bathed in UV and Radiation because there was no Ozone layer yet no life was there to produce the oxygen necessary for 03 to materialize. got stuck by lighting and turned into a living cell. Many men way smarter than you or I have been working on it for all of human existence and yet the only answers we have are this either rock water soup or God. You choose whos crazy now. Prove one word I said wrong I dare you.

[@marshalcraft]

This is simply a lot of complex and useful science, that doesn't explain what caused the world. You can do two things it seems, choose to ignore and not ask the question, or realize, something which needs no cause, clearly this thing has many of the characteristics and semantics of the word "God". It is quite clear, everything is here because of God.

[@marshalcraft]

Even G.R. sure a great theory, but it's interpretations here, are wrong. The fact is I can embed G.R. space into eucludean flat space. And in that space the moon "knows" just where to move and curve, making choice. Just the same, you can choose to say well the moon just curves and what not for no reason (curved space) or say, we just don't know yet. How information, not photon, completely undetectable, transmits to massive bodies. Gravity waves, okay, but in what? How well do we know what a space is? Only from the vacuums technology allows us to achieve. Voyager ventures further then the planets, Sun, and mass in Vacuum and maybe we learn more, Maybe space isn't a vacuum as much as we think. Sure from a functional point, there's not much which we can do with this, and it's mostly limits to what we can know, but I don't have to sit here, and not attempt to predict further with the information we have, I will frame hypothesis if I can and have time.

[@2asseddog]

I thought he was nuts until he started going on about Boltzman brains. Then I knew he has no credibility.

[@deaftodd]

When I watch a campfire making those airborne sparks, I wondered if those sparks were making big bangs, too. In their internal time frame their universes maybe seem to last almost forever but not to our own eyes. We maybe inside one of those fire spark when gods are sitting by that fire enjoying it without even knowing what's been happening.

[@14zz]

They are.

[@ma10coll]

lay off the weed

[@davidkelley5382]

Todd Cooper Indeed, keeping the ability to accept counterintuitive ideas is pretty much a requirement when attempting to grok this subject matter.

[@crazy8sdrums]

I realize that I have posted a paradox right below this. It may seem like there is no solution to avoid that paradox, but one does exist...and that solution answers some very difficult questions that we have not collectively overcome. We have been misled....either accidentally (because people just didn't know better) or deliberately. I suspect it has been deliberate, because the solution suggests some concepts that many just don't want to deal with.

[@relatedreality]

This question always makes me freak out. Makes my head feel hot and I feel nauseous

[@plsbuffme5470]

COULD WE CREATE OUR OWN LITTLE MINI BIG BANG IN ORDER TO CREATE OUR OWN LITTLE UNIVERSE? PLOT TWIST: WHAT IF BEYOND OUR UNIVERSE THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE US BUT VERY VERY GIANT AND OFCOURSE VERY SMART WHO CREATED OUR UNIVERSEBY CREATING THE BIG BANG?!(WE'D BE INVISIBLETO THEM WITH THE BLIND EYE TO GIVE U AN IDEA OF THEIR SIZE)

[@JasonRobards2]

This might be a smart man, but he is talking a lot without saying much. Near the end I felt he was avoiding the questions.

[@plsbuffme5470]

Same but what.. IF COULD WE CREATE OUR OWN LITTLE MINI BIG BANG IN ORDER TO CREATE OUR OWN LITTLE UNIVERSE? PLOT TWIST: WHAT IF BEYOND OUR UNIVERSE THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE US BUT VERY VERY GIANT AND OFCOURSE VERY SMART WHO CREATED OUR UNIVERSEBY CREATING THE BIG BANG?!(WE'D BE INVISIBLETO THEM WITH THE BLIND EYE TO GIVE U AN IDEA OF THEIR SIZE)

[@reducecotwo]

Not a Big Bang....Universe Mitosis, out with the old, in with the new.

[@afaf233]

yes interesting

[@flymasterA]

If everything came into existence in a 'big bang', why would time be inconsistent? If time is then relative, what's it relative to? And can I count to 10 while skipping numbers? What if those numbers wound up in a different time period 1000's or millions of years ago, or in the future?

[@tookaysevon]

"he knew how to do all this fancy quantum mechanics stuff" lol

[@brendawilliams8062]

Singing when you talk has a good soul is the bottom line

[@jonassalk1387]

I hypothesize that we are already traveling at the speed of light, along with the rest of the universe, So can I be disproven?

[@hunterhyatt8100]

Nothing can be disproven. We don't know anything at all. Yea we might be able to do the math and all but until we actually test things first hand, it's all theory.

[@magneticflux7833]

What a charming guy from Kentucky, nice hat, smashing tie, great suit, blue eyes..well played sir, add your accent game win!!!!

[@shaggystone6397]

Im going back & start with # 1 & work my way up to 6. Im hoping it gives me a more solid understanding of what prof. Gott said

[@bigphil2695]

This guy is literally a time cowboy

[@jasontessier4111]

Wows, I've watched a lot of different content such as this and I must say, very very well done... cheers

[@PhilHalper1]

Thanks very much Jason.

[@20july1944]

Peter: Of course the earth is round. Where do you think the universe came from?

[@adamjbond]

bummer, only one interviewee. Guess the budget got cut.

[@fightfannerd2078]

dumb comment

[@BenGrem917]

Now, I’m just a trucker, and I’m just spitballing, but hear me out here, if Gott’s model is correct and a discreet infinitesimal patch of this spacetime within this observable universe is then, through closed timeline curves-which all such countless discreet parcels of spacetime have-said to have created this universe, then may not all other parcels of spacetime have birthed other universes of their own? In disconnected spacetime geometries that we simply do not interact with from our perspective? This may, in fact, be gibberish, I don’t know. But I like it. If every smallest mote of spacetime had birthed it’s own universes in which every smallest mote of spacetime had birthed THEIR own universes, and so on. In a branching infinity. I’m quite fond of the concept of an infinite cosmos. I know it’s a bit unpopular. But I see nothing which precludes this possibility. And it resolves the issue of “first cause” quite nicely, imo. It makes me wonder if this model and some others could not find common syncretization. The issue, of course, ultimately is what is real and testable-not what I like and find elegant. But damn if I don’t find infinity in all conceivable directions elegant. Including in the supposedly smallest unit of a thing. Fits Laozi and Yogacara cosmographies. A universe in a mote in our universe, and this whole universe as a mote in another macrocosm above it. Infinite in both directions. Or, at least, endless. Infinities are fun. I don’t know why scientists I’ve spoken to find them distasteful. Is it because it would forever remain unquantifiable or unexplored?

[@CesarClouds]

You are a very intelligent trucker.

[@JAMAICADOCK]

So Anti-Matter could just be Matter travelling back in time?

[@flymasterA]

What if you sent matter back 15 billion years. Where would it go? Can the universe expand backwards?

[@tokajileo5928]

it does not explain where the laws that allow the universe to create itself coming from.

[@xx3868]

Quantum physics is not understandable by usual human observational methods . There cant really be a before the BB, because there was no time/space so thats where it gets very tricky. The laws may or may not be packaged with the BB like drivers with your windows 10 disk! haha there is no before as we know it and may be having trouble grasping it with our African evolved stupid brain and limited thinking only in the linear that our nice universe gives us. QT has electrons moving together separated way apart by no possible connection; like in a transistor gate which you have a billion in your computer CPU. Magic or just we dont understand. Physics is going to get really way out from this point on.

[@nemesis4785]

@@xx3868 Re: QT has electrons moving together separated way apart by no possible connection. Weren't all forces unified at a 'moment' and 'point' of origin, thereby 'forever' establishing a currently intangible and permanent instantaneous connection ?

[@xx3868]

@@nemesis4785 I thin it was Krauss saying that an electron on the other side of the universe or galaxy reacts to one here yet no connection. SO... is quantum Theory the absolute tip of a massive amount of learning to come and the "god" that 95% of earth seems to worship is actually some kind of conscious direction that moves everything along and somehow keeps an order if you can call the universe that. Not a thinking conscious of course just a sort of universe sort of "aware" of itself? I never believe what i just said as its unscientific and lightening and all that was thought as from a god and we keep finding explanations. The thought now that the insane size of the universe our mind ape mind can only grasp may only be a fraction of whats going on out there and thus we may never be able to explain it but come up with a "string" idead that threads it all together. The extra dimension and all that is way out there but makes sense and it also helped explain the twisted rules of QT that even experts say they havnt got a clue and thats modesty!!! Even Krauss as smart as he is, says he doesnt know stuff and also cant know what he doesent know yet or even a a idea for. This can of worms isnt taking away everyones god if it isnt there to start with, but may take us into a really scary "hell" of really frightening maths that gives one nightmares and THIS maybe the universe hell we keep taking about. It follows as something really bizarre, not too boring and natural may be needed to get the something from nothing and perhaps we may see the seething couldrin of particles popping into and out of existence as sort of "alive" The dark energy/matter and all that may all be a swimming moving evolving "entity" not live in the sense but randomly spewing out these universes- so we REALLY are unimportant as all the aliens that are nearby to us in astronomical terms. I actually like the idea of a previous big crunch then like a collapsed star the reverse of expansion and all that mass and energy starts all over agian. BUT this is not favoured now for various reason so we are back to nothing before something and you cant have a before if time/space dosent exist.

[@nemesis4785]

@@xx3868 I try to hold on to the fact that our energy, electron, protons and neutrons now manifest in organic form as humans, originated from the same 'place' as everything 'out there'. As such, 'out there' is the same as 'right here', and we probably all hold the key to a richer and deeper understanding of the 'grand scheme' of things. I still feel, however, that language and maths, leads into a sort of unending trap or 'madness', as answers to deep, deep questions will certainly present us with new questions. We try to bring the realm of the unknown into the realm of the known, yet there may well be a realm of the unknowable that we as a species will always be separate from. The important thing, I think, is that we try to grasp apparently bizarre truths, if the evidence is undeniable, and patiently build from there. If a certain contemporary truth is eventually superceded by a more 'satisfactory' truth then nobody really failed . . . in fact this represents a great triumph of the 'evolution of thought' and represents actual progress. I enjoyed reading your thoughts, you are obviously a deep thinker and make some very interesting observations.

[@xx3868]

@@nemesis4785 50-70 years ago, our invasion films has silver saucers with ray gun toting aliens killing us "analogue" style. Fast forward to independence day and massive ships full of locust like beings come here to strip the planet of anything valuable and move on. a simple computer virus was enough to destroy them! Humans can only see the universe in its current eyes and in just a short time, we have gone from nuclear destruction to wanting peace and saving and not destroying except for the "getting ahead" urges we have which is ruining the planet and heating it. So imagine what 1000 years from now, the regulations on doing anything on Earth? or a million years. also we discovered, the galaxy seems to have plenty of ice/water planets and oxygen and silicon so invasions for resources is off the table now. So our planet and its people are too far to come and too common to be bothered with and may explain why we are still here assuming we in a guide book "what to do" at Wolf 359 not too far in light years from here. IF, there is already life out there and close enough together to make contact, then problems would occur and thus some kind of law/ treaty system even a "united nations for the galaxy or section may be establish which might also list our area off limits or "uncharted" and respected. In a few years the James Webb telescope will be launched and we may sample those atmospheres of the near by suns planets we found with hubble. What if we detect life gasses, even if just basic- although we couldnt be sure if basic or advanced giving off these. So, we could find ourselves stuck here with no possible way of finding out but discovered life outside our own closed solar system. What then. Yes we can send. They are proposing to send tiny high speed probes at a fraction of the speed of light to these suns- should take 10-20 years and FAST flyby! taking pics ect and sending back data. Once again we wont/ never see the surface to confirm anything. Our increasing tech may be a double edged sword and how will the worlds faiths react to life out there? The evidence for multi galaxies seems to lean that way with QT but how we could ever really prove it and may end up be totally wrong. BUT just static universe that came into being then all this activity seems a little "dry" to me and i previous universe collapsing and compressing then expanding out at least is easily imagined by our iron age brains. Its possible now its way more than this with universes doing this all over the place and strings binding the whole mess and physics together- who knows? I really wonder if something landed or transported in the middle east thousands of years ago and started all this god worship? Problem is at the time they were the most ignorant backwards people of the area. The Chinese and Egyptians were in full spring up to 6000 years back from now with writings on everything YET no mention of a flood or jesus, just stable life with the nile up and down and a lot of pyramid development from crack and failures to the great pyramid which is still in near perfect condition. All with no thought of a wheel just drag and stack and carve and some very accurate measuring which is explained with surveying the nile when it changes position so we have the answer to accuracy maybe. The alignment to north is only a few seconds to true north BUT its not perfect which you would think aliens would do if they helped. So very very good but not too unexpected. The question of life out there is 3 possibilities. None ,only some and prolific just as our planet has millions died before and to come after humans. That idea also changes with time now we are seeing planets on most suns. So planet groups like ours is fairly common, does it follow life is too as only earth seems to have life and it is a bit freakish on gasses and distance and protection with magnetic shields. Problem is every time science predicts something it seems to be proven and more than we could imagined. We have seen the black hole og our galaxy indirectly, formation of planets near suns and warped space/ time SO are we in for massive surprises in the next 50 years? Physics and tech will allow us to find and confirm life BUT the same physics (distance and speed limits) MAY never allow us to meet this life- seems very unfair.....

[@secularisrael]

A great interview and video, thanks!

[@PhilHalper1]

Thanks

[@MrEnjoivolcom1]

Neil deGrasse Tyson has some competition for coolest hat in astronomy. Loved listening to this guy!

[@frankshifreen]

Another great video- and the best one yet elucidating Gotts argument- how it relates to Hawking's initial conditions and also to Susskind and Maldecena, ads/CFT, ER=EPR, etc. Other scientists who are in this field. I bet your adventures making these videos would make a great movie or book. They must also take a lot of money, time and love to make- thanks

[@PhilHalper1]

Thanks Frank, you are very kind. Yes these films take a lot of time and effort to make and if you know a publisher I'd happily tell the story.

[@frankshifreen]

I know a few- not science publishers though- you might want to stick to video but you could transcribe and edit - just from your tapes. John Brockman on edge is doing it. Greene, Kaku, Hawking, Levin.People have a hunger for stories about cutting-edge science- and they sell well. You have 3700 views today, had 300 yesterday. I try to watch Lenny Suskind on youtube and it is difficult going. I am not being kind - I am obsessed with it. I f you had a treatment I would pass it along. But with all your material might want to go to the publishers of the most successful books. Another point is it counters religious thinking and creationism which I saw you guys are working against als

[@patboyer894]

Frank Shifreen

[@frankshifreen]

Pat Boyer Are you the painter?

[@BlindMeadows]

I love this series, I might even go as far as saying it's my favorite one, but the Earth-Moon animation in the beginning had so many things wrong with it I almost became a flatearther just by looking at it :)

[@jengleheimerschmitt7941]

I'm a cube-earther. Our planet should be a big cube.

[@amandahamblin1208]

I love seeing people from my state that aren't explaining the trailer park explosion on the news.

[@sidarthur8706]

this is a bloody good programme. american tv usually does my head in because of the constant repetition because of the half hour of ad breaks but this is just a lecture with graphics, good on you

[@PhilHalper1]

thanks very much

[@behnamasid]

This is new type of physics, it's called Cowboy physics.

[@loudvoice8933]

U mean they gonna shoot us if we not obey this new pseudo science??? LOL!

[@sambriddon3271]

Yee=mc2

[@HarryNicNicholas]

yeeha!!

[@Moonless6491]

God describes himself as "I am"

[@nfergus11]

The short answer is yes...all things in the universe are subject to use and then reuse. All things get recycled.

[@charlesrockafellor4200]

1:41... moon's orbital direction is *ss-backward. My real question though is this: why is the figure on the right often so animated, as if actively replying in a discussion (with no apparent audio thereof) while Prof. Gott is in the middle of saying things?

[@noobcakeeight9506]

when she says "we can remember the past but we never remember the future" i think maybe deja vu is remembering the future

[@HarryNicNicholas]

"contact" is a very unexciting film that explores this possibility, aliens teach us a language that enables us to treat future events the same way we do past ones, like you say, we can remember the past, maybe we can "remember" the future. the film is really a love story, but it's billed as sci-fi.

[@davee66]

Deja vu is remembering the present. Crossed wires in the brain and you experience the present as a memory.

[@ne0princess]

@@davee66 Please stop spreading disinformation. The British engineer and philosopher J.W. Dunne wrote "An Experiment with Time" and "The Serial Universe" over a century ago, his work encompasses not only the basis of serialism in a proposed infinite regress of time and consciousness, but some of its consequences in terms of parapsychological phenomena such as "deja vu" or precognitive dreams, and more prosaically the nature of space and time as set out in the theory of Relativity. Even a mathematical appendix sets out the relationship we see between Serialism and the Minkowski spacetime which underlies Einstein's theory of Relativity.

[@mattsmith1440]

@@ne0princess Actually James is correct. I would respectfully suggest reducing your woo-woo intake, and studying some neuroscience.

[@ne0princess]

​@@mattsmith1440 Disprove Dunne's quantum theories right now in this comment section, galaxy brain.

[@roybaines3181]

Excellent videos on this channel, subscribed, thanks.

[@PhilHalper1]

Thanks Roy

[@tubblehelescope-6282]

Love videos like this. I am always interested in the whole meaning of life, not by the whole religion way but how the whole universe happened to be. At least we have people on the earth who actually care about space and looking beyond. I find that sometimes people just live by society and never show interest in anything but drinking, smoking, and drugs. Keep up the good work 😊 Regards Memes.

[@PhilHalper1]

thanks

[@MSA6001]

The universe is alive everywhere replicating itself over and over.

[@mrEofPlanetEarth]

This guy makes sense, but he sounds like a nut, hilarious.

[@jmitterii2]

I saw him on a panel of other theoretical physicists. He purposely wears that colorful suit as some joke he did in the past... it's all lighthearted fun... he's in on conjecture and some hypothesis that could be tested in the near future.

[@arman757]

I think that is common to truly smart people, I had a physics teacher just like him

[@TheIntJuggler]

That's called being gay.

[@mezmerizer9422]

Richard Gott sounds like Ross from Friends.

[@garryjones5403]

He is dressed like a Miami Attorney!😎

[@jeromehorwitz2460]

At the tiniest scales the borderline between existence and non-existence flickers back and forth randomly-- reality is fuzzy and indeterminate at sizes smaller than electrons. This randomness propagates upward to determine the pattern of the largest structures such as galaxy clusters.

[@jamestagge3429]

is that really so? I thought we were told that the vibrating energy quanta which are the smallest "entities" of which all things are composed, are really local phenomena in a particle field. Since no one can answer the question as to the motive force behind them that that force might cease for fractions of time and begin again, which is all tunneling is, is not that amazing or mysterious, especially in the context of our ignorance about that force. It is not reality flickering so to speak, but just that part of it, the most important part, fluctuating as is a normal aspect of its function. Yes?

[@jeromehorwitz2460]

@@jamestagge3429 At the quantum scale (very small) a thing both exists and doesn't exist at the same time. It is a potential existence until it is observed, there is always a degree of "quantum uncertainty" about it, a state which can only be described in terms of probability. At the level of everyday human experience this is not so because we are dealing with big packages of quantum information, not individual particles. At the moment of the Big Bang the entire universe was smaller than the Planck length and so was subject to quantum mechanical fluctuations where the distinction between existence and non-existence is fuzzy.

[@jamestagge3429]

@@jeromehorwitz2460 First i really appreciate your responses. You seem to know your stuff, though we may disagree on matters (such as this one). That might be because there is just a path other than that you have taken which i have, neither to have been determined correct as yet or that i am wrong and ill informed due in part to badly done videos and articles on the matter. I assure you, i know it might be the latter. Well as i mentioned, we disagree on that as some physicists do i believe. things do not both exist and not exist at the same time for being a potential. Consider, in order to have a vibrating energy quantum, there must first be an energy field (this is objective and deterministic). Continuing, in order to have an energy field, there first me be empty space which is a material construct and not a void or actually empty. This is also objective and deterministic. This being the case then the vibrating energy quanta which manifest within these energy fields, though quirky in their behavior, can be no less objective and deterministic. As waves they DO impose effects such as that in the double slit experiment. As particle (in terms of their behavior if that is all it is) they also impose effects as in the double slit experiment. We dont know the motive force behind them, i.e., what makes this locality in a particle field vibrate, but we know that it can stop and restart, etc. This is by definition, equally objective and deterministic. Given the rest of the physics in consequence, it must be. Now i gathered from my readings that this Copenhagen school proposition that these wave forms are wave forms of possibility applied to the location of the particle which was being manifest in its functional field, such as that of an electron. I have never understood this to apply to the operational or functional origins of the wave/particle itself. Its existence cannot be potential for if that were the case, it would throw into chaos all of the nature of material existence with regard to its continuity and longevity among other things. What do you think? P.S. I have a version of the Schroedinger cat experiment which deals with the outer edges of this on which i would love your opinion. See below..................Change the scenario slightly - The cat is inside the box and there is the same atomic emitter and receiver. But in this box, there is a vile of acid (which would also be broken when the receiver reached the designated count from the emitter) rather than poison, which would also kill the cat. Needles in the box, mounted under the cat across the only space within which it would have to move would ensure that it remained standing while alive. If it were to fall as a product of its death when the acid vile were broken (releasing the acid fumes), it would be skewed by the needles and affect the mechanism holding the acid vile which would cause it to tip over and spill its contents on the floor of the box. When the acid finally ate through the bottom of the box, it would be because the cat was deterministically dead. There would be no wave function to collapse. The observation would be forced by the string of deterministic events ending in the acid dripping to the floor after having eaten through the box which could only have happened after and because the unobserved cat had died. The observation would be after the fact, not prior as in the original scenario and thus, it could not be defining of that event in any way or measure. Does this work to put into question this wave form phenomenon as it applies to composite entities?

[@xeeleepoker2698]

The accent, That Suit that matches his eyes, The Dandy Hat guy has some style and class and dresses like a grown up. You have to love his descriptions he loves sharing with lay people - A real life Emmet Brown, you would love to just hang around with!

[@222foont]

Space Pimp!

[@xeeleepoker2698]

I would Just be happy to be allowed to go to his house do his washing, anything he needed just to get to hang out and learn something from him. Physics and Style tips. Maybe its because im getting older I think thats cooler than skateboarding now....

[@FistOfMichallin]

“The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.” - Werner Heisenberg

[@Tbone42tx]

A Universe stuck in a loop? I guess that could explain deja vu😂😂

[@brendawilliams8062]

Well…….no

[@colinshawhan8590]

This guy has seen "Groundhog's Day" one too many times! I love that he manages to sketch his grand unifying theory of everything on 8.5 x 11 printer paper, that's awesome!

[@jsmcguireIII]

The concept of "create" is a product of human cognition. The question is unanswerable because the terms are inappropriate.

[@flymasterA]

So tell me what is an appropriate term. Does the word 'create' bother you? You prefer "unanswerable". That relieves you of any responsibility to shed any light. Thanks for nothing. Now go play.

[@rafaelstroggilos1309]

the most fabulous scientist ever (in earth)

[@nordlyd]

What goes into a black hole.. comes out as a new univers.. There never was a "big" bang, But a creation of a new black hole.. So If I´m right here, there are manny universes.. ;) Take care.. Greedings From Denmark ...

[@jamestagge3429]

 Consider….If the segment which broke off and traveled back in time to become the source of the new universe, what was its source at that point of arrival just prior to the universe to which it gave rise? Remember, this segment is not a single point in time, but partially developed that it might be sufficiently self-sustaining as an entity to make the time loop (if that were even remotely possible). It thus carries with it the history of the original source of the mother universe from which it developed, i.e., the original source of the original mother universe. Now, back through time and sitting at the beginning of it all, that history is still relevant. What was the source of the segment (which was also the source of the universe from which it came)?. That that original mother universe has been erased in time does not erase the source for it is contained within the history of the segment, still in existence (which as I mentioned above, I think is not possible).