What a fascinating job you have! Thanks for the giraffe tidbit.
@bawbtherevelator64453 жыл бұрын
Hi! I'm 83, in Los Angeles and unlikely to visit in the future - BUT my age 12 grandson need to know that terrific things happen everywhere in the world!! Thanks so much!
@rameyzamora10186 жыл бұрын
"Everything was listed under A for Antiquities." Great post. Thank you.
@AntonAngelo6 жыл бұрын
I do so love these videos.
@rhijulbec16 жыл бұрын
Anton Angelo As do I. So well done.
@TheYoyozo5 жыл бұрын
I want to hear more about the pebble. Love the name Camel Leopard. She did great!
@QueueTheRandom3 жыл бұрын
I love the witty remarks of this lady !
@paulstein88544 жыл бұрын
I love this series so much. Even the little watched episodes are amazing
@Splash_of_Freedom6 ай бұрын
I'd love more videos about the archives. Francesca did a great job!
@mreckes9967 Жыл бұрын
Ahhh what a place to be, never ever be short of reading material
@miteor3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for taking the time and trouble to make these they are so intriguing 😊👍😊
@sleepytabby91133 жыл бұрын
Archivist at the British Museum. My dream job ❤
@phillgreenland23906 жыл бұрын
Best Curator’s Corner ever!
@doggodoggo30004 жыл бұрын
MORE ARCHIVES VIDEOS PLEASE!!!!
@mch123119694 жыл бұрын
"Cameleopard", I love that and am going to start using it!
@spencerjbbran Жыл бұрын
This is truly quite fascinating. I had a great chuckle while imagining some 19th century British people walking into The British Museum gasping and then looking at the towering stuffed giraffes like "What the absolute hell are those things????".
@bobnewmanknott34335 жыл бұрын
Great job Great curator perfect match !! Great video thanks
@zeropointconsciousness3 жыл бұрын
So interesting. I would love to work in amongst all the antiquities.
@PeterGaunt Жыл бұрын
You have one fascinating job.
@loriallen76516 жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed your video. I'll be looking into your blog next. Curator's Corner is a terrific You Tube series! Very interested in your department! Thanks.
@SJF15 Жыл бұрын
I think she knows what shes doing!
@LH-ro2ot3 жыл бұрын
Excellent. More please 😁
@aquaglow16 жыл бұрын
Very interesting insight into your role
@grantbartley4832 жыл бұрын
Where did Noah keep his bees? In his ark hive
@Jockeylotforfun6 жыл бұрын
Did you mention your name is Job? Very impressive display of grace and tenacity madame. I enjoyed your story, thanks.
@claudiaramosmonteiro4 жыл бұрын
This is very cool!
@meijimarts1114 жыл бұрын
How does she log ang relocate some of those heavier objects? Is she alone on her job? Does she have assistants? Is she secrety Wonder Woman?
@deborahmelo79936 жыл бұрын
Lovely!!!!!
@melmoland9886 жыл бұрын
What I wouldn't give to work for the museum
@PHlophe6 жыл бұрын
Mel, study get that degree and you could be working in there. Most archivist and curatrix are female, which is a bonus.
@dajapa5 жыл бұрын
Lechiffresix six Do you work in a museum? What is your degree? 'o' and is an archivist a branch of conservation??
@rexcorvorum42624 жыл бұрын
One of the best jobs in the world
@andeace236 жыл бұрын
My dream job
@LordInter3 жыл бұрын
yep, those books are from 1830 and the museum was already 100 years old by then! 😂
@lynnblack64932 жыл бұрын
Good one. Camel leopards!
@caseyash49093 жыл бұрын
I can imagine a bunch of drunk non-pc zebras abusing the munching giraffes: Hey, you camelopards
@poshpaul55 Жыл бұрын
im 56 and i never knew this
@sapuraagzamova4280 Жыл бұрын
Hello!
@doggodoggo30004 жыл бұрын
Really the biggest shame is how poorly i can guarantee those stuffed giraffes looked. Probably the hardest to stuff animal on the planet being stuffed by a guy who has probably never actually seen one. I can guarantee they were very off looking. Even after seeing the ones stuffed in the museum these people had no idea what one actually looked like lol (it would have been impressive due to the sheer size and proportions but still. Its not sad they arent there anymore im pretty sure lol)
@thebatt61835 жыл бұрын
er, did any ebbles fly u into the air by themselves just curious
@SilentGamesBread3 жыл бұрын
Hello
@dday14124 жыл бұрын
In Afrikaans: Kameelperd.
@SimonHollandfilms7 ай бұрын
camel leopards are about as British as a baguette. Stolen British Stuff Museum?
@selotmani12 жыл бұрын
you are beautiful, just smile
@petrfrizen60786 жыл бұрын
It’s a huge pity that these were the killed creatures… Wooden, carved - molded images would had have been indescribably more appropriate… What about the London Zoo?.. There weren’t any camelopards there?.. Or at those times the London Zoo hadn’t come to fruition yet?..
@PastPresented6 жыл бұрын
Transporting live giraffes from Africa to Britain was not easy, and the first success was in 1827 (one year before the establishment of London Zoo, but centuries after the royal family started keeping exotic animals, which were often given them as presents), when a female was given to King George IV. She only survived in Windsor Great Park for a couple of years, but she did get her portrait painted: www.royalcollection.org.uk/collection/404394/the-nubian-giraffe
@petrfrizen60786 жыл бұрын
Very cute and very sweet! Who authored that work of art, of you don’t mind my asking?.. Please, confirm!
@petrfrizen60786 жыл бұрын
I mean, that the portrait was painted… not that the creatures perished…
@PastPresented6 жыл бұрын
The painting was by this guy: www.jacques-laurent-agasse.org/
@doggodoggo30004 жыл бұрын
I disagree. The point of museums at that time was to show people the wonders of the natural world. Paintings and stuff already existed. Ill admit its sad to kill an animal just to put it on display. But that is a modern consequence. At the time this was the best way. And alot of these those old museum samples have alot of relevance even today. The way we documented these animals, sometime with reckless abandon, Is kind of what we are preserving now. Human Nature. My favorite museum exhibit i have ever been in is a collection at the History Museum in Downtown Charleston SC. Its the "old museum" collection. A series of poorly stuffed extinct and endangered animals from the late 1800s. in short. It would be more appropriate in today's day and age. But not back then. I really was just different. But not really. When studying insects and other animals even today in places they set TRAPS and identify the remains. And not just like a few. You havent discovered a new species without first collecting many specimen samples and comparing them to other closely related species.
@barrykent98776 жыл бұрын
No gloves? Please - don't do this anymore... It gaves me shivers... I understand your hands are clean and so on, but we cannot know what heat or water or any bacteria on our hands can do to ancient paper... Please, never do it again!
@PastPresented6 жыл бұрын
We can know what handling with desensitized fingers can do to fragile paper though (paper being, particularly since the 19th century, often its own worst enemy), so it's very much a "lesser of two evils" choice.
@fastauntie6 жыл бұрын
It's great that you want to be sure these important objects are being handled carefully. Please be assured that in this case they are. Professional book and paper conservators , who spend a lot of their time looking at damaged old paper and determining the causes, recommend handling most books and papers, even very old and rare ones, with clean bare hands as being safer for the objects than using gloves. Two experienced conservators published a very thorough investigation of the question in International Preservation News, which you can read at www.ifla.org/VI/4/news/ipnn37.pdf. Here's a summary of the important points: There is no scientific evidence that skin chemicals damage paper; basic hand-washing is enough to remove any dirt or other substances that might be transferred to the objects. The article doesn't mention bacteria, but if you're washing your hands in the way that public health experts recommend we always do, you'll get rid of enough of them. (Don't apply hand sanitizer afterward, by the way--those will leave gooey residues that can damage paper.) The authors do point out that most old books and papers have been extensively handled over decades and centuries, often in dirty, smoky environments and by people whose sanitary practices were "less-than-ideal," and yet show very little evidence of it. Gloves easily pick up dirt and other substances from anything you touch--oil and makeup from your face and hair, bits of dirt or polish from the edges of furniture, debris from disintegrating leather bindings--and transfer them to the paper. You can keep changing gloves, but it's easier and cheaper just to rewash your hands if they get to look or feel dirty. The biggest problem with gloves is that they reduce the touch sensitivity you need to handle paper, especially fragile paper, safely. Try this at home: take an old magazine or a beat-up paperback you don't care about, put on a pair of cotton gloves, and page through it. Now imagine you're doing this with something very rare and valuable. Still sure that's the safest way? Gloves are appropriate for certain other materials, like photos, metals, and fine textiles. It was only in the 1990s that many librarians and archivists, seeing them in supply catalogs, seem to have got the idea that they were the standard of care for all special materials. It never became the standard in most places, but this coincided with the rise of shows like Antiques Roadshow, History Detectives, and so on, where most people got their first look at people handling rare materials in libraries and archives, so gloves became part of the popular image. TV crews like them because they help things look more important and special, and I've known crews to try to make curators and archivists wear them for a shoot even after being told it is against their policy for all the reasons given above. In short, it's always important to handle rare objects carefully. But what constitutes proper care varies with the type of object.
@dajapa5 жыл бұрын
Elizabeth Fuller wow. That's a great information! Are you a conservator by any chance? Btw, I can't see the link :(
@Markle2k5 жыл бұрын
@@fastauntie There is also a video here featuring several curators on this very subject. People tend to invest objects, including plain cotton gloves, with magical properties, not bothering to stop and think about whether it makes any sense.
@analiemartinez-panizales88212 жыл бұрын
Calm down and dont be dramatic. They use clean jands instead so they can feel wether the paper is ripping or not. Its better and less risk of damage. They do use gloves on objects and sometimes pictures. But on paper its a big no no
@ChrisPeck-niganma4 жыл бұрын
I love all these videos. Many of the curators lack charisma but their passion for their subject smolders under their stodgy exteriors and their expertise shins bright regardless. Ms Hiller is undoubtedly an unsung hero, I'm glad I saw her.