Best and Worst Byzantine Enemies

[@RagnaCloud13]

Everything with Belisarius is Awesome for Byzantines

[@theVoid-V]

Lost Lazic war against Sassanids & and ultimately lost Gothic war after Gothic revival under Totila it was Narses who conquered Italy and ended Goth Kingdom, defeating Totila and his son which overrated Belisarius failed to do , So after all his only achievement is Annexation of Vandalic Kingdom

[@octavian7637]

@@theVoid-V Belisarius was overrated ? and we still haven't forget what Narses assholeness did to Mediolanum

[@Alpharius_Dominatus]

Who's belisaurus?

[@arsacen]

Belisarius lost 2 times against Sassanians, while he was outnumbering them

[@ramtin5152]

​@@arsacen He lost a total of 4 out of 6 battles against the Sassanids, 1 draw and one victory

[@hạt_cải]

Justinian I reign was so OP it had to be nerfed with a plague

[@milkmonster2310]

Dude tanked the Byzantine treasury and used up all their resources.

[@tomosjackson4760]

@@milkmonster2310 Yes, but he used it on something cool 😎

[@nicbahtin4774]

@@milkmonster2310 nah it's his idiot successors spend it all away on pleasing useless nobility. Maurice reign came too late.

[@ΓιωργοςΦραγκιαδακης-μ1ζ]

And one of the biggest and most bloody revolts an Empire ever faced. His wife hard carried him not to quit.

[@hạt_cải]

@@milkmonster2310 The wealth when they retake Rome was enough to pay off the treasury toll. It was the plague, the plague, which is something no one could ever anticipate.

[@nikolaosboukouvalas449]

You forgot the biggest enemy of the Byzantine Empire: Edward Gibbon.

[@hititmanify]

lol, based

[@MausOfTheHouse]

The Eternal Anglo Perfidious Albion

[@kryzzan7039]

Edward Gibbon was right all along!

[@destroyermanfernandez6471]

Who is Edward Gibbon?

[@BATTERIESc]

@@destroyermanfernandez6471 He was an English backbencher MP who never once spoke in Parliament in his years elected but spent all his time compiling the history of the fall of the roman empire.

[@barppoots4378]

The Fourth crusade really messed everything up. 🤬😭

[@GenAlphaOrthodox]

😭😭😭

[@Zvabh]

Based

[@lucaannunziata6503]

Yes and no Unders Alexios III Angelos, the worst emperor ever, many provinces started to basically become indipendent and not respond to the imperial government Basically the Fourth Crusade was the final strike to a building with rotten foundations

[@kuro1132]

Not really. The downfall started decades prior to the fourth crusade. The constant intrigue and dynastic conflicts....

[@barppoots4378]

@ yeah but it was the final nail in the coffin. The Byzantine empire never really recovered from the sacking of Constantinople.

[@Mya37la]

Koymuşuz.

[@presidentialsystemenjoyer]

şşş ardı yanıklar toplanmasın

[@BahriyeNaziri]

Koymayı bırak domaltmışız

[@thomasangelo15]

zıplatmışız hoplatmışız dehlemişiz

[@AlptheSpearo]

Yok etmişiz

[@Aerzyt]

s£kmeşiz

[@legendboyyo3188]

Rashiduns, Seljuks and Ottomans: 🗿

[@British_empire69]

Okay buddy

[@Kenanisayev30]

You forgot Attila

[@LemurEater]

not linked to eastern romans

[@Aerzyt]

@@LemurEater thrace and caucasian campaign?

[@SirPeterKozlov]

@@LemurEater Yes he is, he attacked Eastern Rome before he went after the West.

[@LemurEater]

@@SirPeterKozlov oh yeh youre right, mb

[@Darth_Vader_31]

"it wasn't a fall, it was a *conquest* "

[@gameland6764]

Lord Vader.I guess you mean the conquest of Constantinople right??

[@metehanakdagg]

@@gameland6764 İstanbul*

[@Aizen231]

🗿🔥🔥

[@makutas-v261]

No, it was simply a minor take over XD it had already fallen long before and defending it were only 7000 guys and walls.

[@BEnJAmiN78784]

​@@makutas-v261thats what ur little sources say to make the war look like effortless do you know how many times Fatih Tried to raid the city and lost? Until the end

[@hạt_cải]

Should have included Umayyads ( but you have Greek fire )

[@ozlembaytur7426]

evet ve tervel han

[@ArabCaliphate]

As an Arab i agree Greek fire played a massive role in Byzantine's victory in the 717-718 siege of Constantinople, if it wasn't for The Easteren Romans nothing would've stopped the Arab armies from taking southern Europe or conquering the balkan, Charles Martel takes the credit undeservingly for defeating a 10k raiding party while no one mentions Emperor Leo the Isaurian who destroyed a 80k army with one of the finest medieval naval combat creations: the Greek Fire

[@hạt_cải]

The ancient Theodosian wall silently endured and repelled thousands of waves of foreign attacks on Europe's front gate, the Byzantine Empire was the silent protector of the west 💔

[@ahmedsalek976]

Greek fire couldn't save them from losing whatever land they still had in Africa which Umayyads took

[@rorrikiller8662]

@@ahmedsalek976 Yes, but Unlike Egypt or Syria, Africa conquest took 60 years.

[@RagnaCloud13]

Basil II: now open your eyes Bulgars.

[@leonardo_fratila]

Why are you all talking about him? There are other leaders who deverve to be more recognised. Basil ii is overrated

[@noobrawlstars]

​@leonardo_fratila he is unknown to most people

[@johnxina8954]

Kaloyan the Romanslayer: Now take a deep breath Romans 😂

[@Dûr019]

​@leonardo_fratila Of course, it's definitely overrated😂😂 left the Empire at its peak of wealth, military power and territorial extent in several centuries, dealt a severe blow to the provincial aristocracy, his legacy maintained the empire as a powerful force for decades after his death and even with several inefficient rulers taking power on the throne . If there is one thing that Basil II is far from being overrated, he was an extremely efficient ruler and general who ensured the Eastern Roman Empire as an extremely dominant power, something that had not happened for centuries.

[@joeshelby3352]

mehmed II & urban: 🤭

[@saaaaassss4768]

‏‪1:04 خالد بن الوليد 🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@dwarow2508]

Regarding the Russians, they really never fought the Byzantines except for a couple raids in the late 9th century, most before they even captured Kiev from the Khazars. Those raids were either successfull for the Russians or went really poorly if the Byzantines had Greek Fire. However starting from the 10th century, the Russians and Byzantines were usually allies against the Bulgarians and the various Steppe peoples.

[@wander2403]

To some extent they were successors to the Byzantine empire.

[@philcassidy3823]

​@@wander2403 by religion or how do you mean? Genuinely asking

[@just_inker2584]

There was no such thing as "russia" 😂 This whole territory was a property of Kyiv at the time. region of russia was a colony between Ukrainians and Scandinavians. The first Rus' raid on Byzantines was organised by Askold and Dir, princes of Kyiv, not by "russians".

[@dwarow2508]

@just_inker2584 There was no such thing as "ukraine"🤣. It was all property of Novgorod. Cope harder🤣 Russia was founded in 862 in Ladoga and later moves the capital to Novgorod. *Kiev*, a small Khazar village, was captured by the Russians only in 872 and made capital only in 882. Ukrainians did not exist lmao. Ukrainians were the result of Russians living under Polish occupation and appeared in the 19th century xD The first Russian raid on thr Byzantines waa organised by Askold and Dir in 867, princes of Rurik, lord of Novgorod, not "ukrainians". Kiev was a Russian city lmao.

[@dwarow2508]

@philcassidy3823 The byzantines emperors often married into the Russian rurikid dynasty. They were so interconected that Ivan IV actually married the last Byzantine princess who not only gave him the coat of arms of the Byzantine Empire, but formally recognized the Tsarsom of Russia as the successor to the Byzantine Empire

[@lucaemilianzamfir3132]

0:26 song name? 1:56 song name? 2:16 song name? Pls

[@bubalolo]

2:30 I felt those screams pierce my soul...

[@halkras]

2:45 Fun Fact of 1453 The cannons were designed by Sultan Mehmed II himself 2:01 fun fact of 1071 manzikert Sultan of Greak Seljuks, Alparslan showed mercy to Romenos Diogenes and even would became allies with him but next kaiser blinded diogenes ad exiled him to death

[@Ash-gr3kg]

crusaders(but they sack constantinople)💀

[@KeDi-q2d]

Türk kardeşim hoşgeldin 👇

[@sarubet8725]

The amount of Turkic people that harassed rome is weird.

[@ibn_adham]

Huh?

[@aleksandarvil5718]

Ranking Kievan Rus’ Enemies NEXT PLZ 😉

[@just_inker2584]

Kievan Rus' is Ukraine btw, no such thing as "russia".

[@UnchiuBaros]

​@@just_inker2584sureee 😂

[@just_inker2584]

@UnchiuBaros Romanian Wikipedia:"Rutenia Kieveană a fost cel mai timpuriu stat al slavilor estici dominat de orașul Kiev, aproximativ din anul 880 până la mijlocul secolului al XII-lea".

[@UnchiuBaros]

@just_inker2584 i don't need you to give me a direct romanian Wikipedia page 😂, and btw in that article i see no "ukrainian" nor "russian" in fact there is "Slavic state" written

[@UnchiuBaros]

@just_inker2584 you just showed me what I've known already, kievan rus ≠Ukraine

[@milkmonster2310]

You have to give a list of the sound effects used in this video dude 😂!

[@gala6369]

bugün de atalarla gururlandık

[@kaganduman2345]

Pp ile çok uyumlu olmadı yazdığın xd.

[@Aerostarm]

I have never seen so many spelling errors in a video

[@unkown2.018]

2:53 753 BC-1461 (if you count empire of Trebizond)

[@K3alx]

It doesn't count as a byzantine/roman empire

[@subutaykhan9387]

Ottomans are the latest Roman empire.Only the Dynasty changed. Rome is not about culture and religion. It is the people who live in it

[@K3alx]

@@subutaykhan9387 Hell nope 💀

[@subutaykhan9387]

@@K3alx why

[@subutaykhan9387]

Nevermind. Idc

[@Radin_nur]

Sassanids but they have khosrow ii💀

[@johnxina8954]

Basil didn't do anything except displaying pettiness for the fact that the Bulgarians killed his close companion and almost killed him. The Bulgarian Empire was already wrecked by the Rus invasion and sack of the capital, immediately followed by a Roman one by John Tzimiskes. Basil was simply feeding on a carcass

[@tylerellis9097]

A Carcass that attacked him first in 976 and managed to full annex Serbia extending Bulgarian control further west than it ever been and even managing to be the only Bulgarian ruler to take Dyrrachium. Samuel took power in a region untouched by the Byzantines with a secure power base and against a weaker Emperor would have won. Basil II had the Superior wealth, manpower and supporting generals but had to deal with a civil war and invasions from the Fatimids and Georgia. It was his superior strategy and determination that led him to victory and even then at great cost/ time only winning in his life time due to the death of Samuel.

[@johnxina8954]

@tylerellis9097 You seem to be very confused about that time period, so let me give you a lesson. The Romans paid the Kievan knyaz Svetoslav to attack Bulgaria in the back, and after he sacked the capital, the Romans took an easy opportunity and occupied the essential Bulgarian territories of what is today Moesia and Dobruja. Samuil wasn't even Emperor at that time, and he didn't attack anyone. He counter attacked. But by that time, the Bulgarian Empire was literally headless. It lost its capital and its entire eastern half. The fact Basil managed to lose so much against him is astonishing. For example, at Trajan's gates, when he was nearly slain by the Bulgarians. And yet, despite being a crumbling empire and despite the Romans being free to diverge all their power against Bulgaria, because they were done with the Arabs, Samuil managed to conquer back some of the old territories, conquer new ones and on top of that destroy and annex Serbia who was again bribed to fight Bulgaria in the back. In the end, Basil, after decades of fighting, lost one of his closest friends to the Bulgarians, so when he captured 14,000 Bulgarian soldiers, he decided to display his barbarism against them. Funny enough, he never actually defeated his rival in the war. Samuil died of natural causes years before it ended. So I'll always be amused how are there people who elevate Basil II when all he did was struggle against a dying empire, already falling apart because of Svetoslav's successes and John's treachery.

[@nicbahtin4774]

0:44 i don't know they sieged Constantinople and almost ended the empire with the sassanids

[@nicbahtin4774]

0:46 nvm

[@Cataphracts_History]

Yes sassanids laid siege on constantinople under the command of general shahin if i remember correctly, unfortunately he betrayed shahan shah khosrow and decided to go back to capital Ctesiphon to overthrown the khosrow. Otherwise he could besieged the constanople for 1 year or so

[@ramtin5152]

​@@Cataphracts_History It was Shahrbaraz who besieged it and Khosrow betrayed him first, by ordering his assassination Shahrbaraz, who's a loyal and experienced general, rightfully decided to never fight for him again He didn't go to Ctesiphon He went to the city of Antioch, remained there and took control of the conquered Roman lands until one year after the war during the reign of Ardashir III 629 AD Khosrow Parviz was dethroned by his own son Kavad II

[@Alex-tx2em]

@@ramtin5152 Very informative. Now name one Persian Pre-Islamic scientist.

[@insaneanwarff9475]

great video bro❤

[@Маньяк-э1н]

Ottomans are the most important reason of the fall of Byzantine

[@Techtalk2030]

Yea when they turned into a city state lol

[@blueowln]

Fourth crusade was the true fall of the eastern Roman empire the rest of the years were the fall of it's successor states

[@phobosdeimos4598]

Wrong. The Byzantines were already in a decline for centuries and even in their state kept coming back. The only thing the Ottomans did was end their suffering and legacy. Not even 5% of their history was influenced by Turks (if you dont count Huns and Khazars).

[@gameland6764]

​@phobosdeimos4598 You are so based to count hunnic history as Turkish history.

[@ozlembaytur7426]

@@Techtalk2030 şehir devleti haline getirenler marslılar değil yine başka bir Türk imparatorluğu

[@liberteryen71]

Nice content bro

[@antonkwanton5620]

well, tbh ostrogoths even with belisarius were one of the worst byzantine enemies. belisarius beat them but then they retook nearly whole of italy. eunuch narses was the one who evaporized goths out of italy. he needed one or two battles to anihilate goths, after 20 years of constant warfare which in belisarius failed

[@marschallhistory3286]

Belisarus actually completely defeated the Ostrogoths. And conquered all of Italy. But when he left again to later fight against the Sassanids. The Ostrogoths were able to rebel successfully. Belisaru's next Italian campaign failed, mainly because the empire was completely overextended at the time. And he never got together a field army larger than 8,000 men. Narses had arrived later when the situation on the other fronts had calmed down. Many more troops available.

[@antonkwanton5620]

@@marschallhistory3286 yeah, he defeated them, but he did not conquer whole italy. parts of the northern italy remained under gothic control and goths swore fealthy to belisarius as the western emperor. belisarius tricked them and did not reestablish western empire but stayed loyal to justnian, so goths rebelled and reconquer peninsula

[@voice_of_ferenc]

Great selection of music

[@emirkarakas7085]

Ottoman and Seljuk Empire💀

[@persian639]

@2:20 Attack on Titan😂

[@Clover_el_alma_amarilla]

The Byzantines only conquered the southern coast of the Visigoth Kingdom and the area was later reconquered by the Visigoths.

[@robloxenjoyer5991]

Bro forgot Myriokephalon is turning point for Byzantine as they are in life support

[@tylerellis9097]

No because the Byzantines counterdefeated the Turks the very next year at Hyelion and Leimocheir. It was the usurpation and tyranny of Andronikos Komnenos that permanently crippled the Empires stability

[@thefavorite1637]

You mean Eastern Roman Empire Enemies

[@Techtalk2030]

They werent roman or latin but greek. Rome fell in 400 AD rip

[@Dicka899]

Romans but they’ve never even stepped foot in Rome?

[@tylerellis9097]

@@Dicka899Byzantines owned Rome for 200 years and Constantinoples official name was New Rome and still called so by the Orthodox Church.

[@presidentialsystemenjoyer]

roman empire is the union of latins and greeks without one they are not Roman

[@pietrogiardini3948]

​@@Techtalk2030Being Roman has very little to do with being Latin. The city of Rome became very insignificant, even before the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Roman and Greek culture are so interconnected that it doesn't make sense to say the 'Byzantines' were culturally Greek.

[@CallofDutyBlackOps28]

I wonder without Alexios Komnenos if the Byzantines could have fallen to the Seljuks; probobly unlikely, but something that i wonder about with how 1000's they were a rocky slope.

[@tylerellis9097]

More likely they’re destroyed by the Normans and Pechenegs in the 1080s

[@abhinav409]

Rome was founded in 7 *53* and ended in 14 *53* . The city of Rome was founded by Romulus, the last roman emperor there was also named Romulus. Constantinople was founded by Constantine, the last emperor there was also named Constantine.

[@Itspapacritz]

Can somebody pls tell me how i can find those heavy metal instrumentals

[@артеммедведев-м7в]

Normans defeated byzantine in italy

[@tylerellis9097]

And in the Balkans repeatedly

[@KHOSROWPARVIZZZZ]

Shapur I: Hello 🗿

[@Blitzman608]

i am subscriber number 600 🎉

[@aybest9707]

Sigma boy ottomans

[@TunahanGuler765]

what is the song between 2.50 and 2.54

[@cbv7207]

Inaccurate 1:00, Avar Khaganate + Sassanids + Little Ice Age + Plague were the cause of Balkans being lost, Slavs alone would be defeated easily

[@gamerwar2113]

sorry to tell you lil bro but moors and the byzantines never even had contact, unless you mean the berber tribes of north africa who were long term allies of the byzantines and the romans

[@Galbaudix]

Moors is just another name for Berbers those two are synonyms, and the moors did in fact had contact especially during Mauritania kingdom

[@tylerellis9097]

Yeah the Berbers constantly raided Byzantine territory until the Arabic invasion forced them to unite and the Byzantines conquered the coast to connect their territory with Ceuta by destroying the Romano Moor Kingdom.

[@gamerwar2113]

@@tylerellis9097 was just confused since the term moor wasnt coined until like the 10th century

[@nazgulbarakas5767]

song names please? some of the metal tracks were really bangin!

[@Alpha-Legion]

What is the song name at 2:21 ?

[@hạt_cải]

It's in attack on titan, but don't know the specific song

[@MyGamerPony]

Attack on Titan self titled

[@alirezaie-em7hq]

you forgot roman slayer's , parthian empire with partizan soldiers💀💀

[@historyfactsshorts22]

Sassanids but you have Phocas💀

[@unsupportedletters5561]

💀

[@Smoothbluehero]

Please post the songs for Visigoths (and you have Belisarius) Normans Serbs Hungarians

[@Madmix1234567]

Serbs - quake champions - inferno (doom mix)

[@Smoothbluehero]

@@Madmix1234567 Thank you

[@ThatGuyScipio]

Belisarius 🔥

[@Spiror]

2 thousands plus years republic and empire, greco roman world…..🎉🎉😊😊

[@KameradenReal]

This meme in 2024?

[@ercancelikpence7535]

can someone give me the visigoth song name?

[@atreast.4331]

I wanted "arabs but you have nikiphoreus phocas"

[@Mangoeplanter]

By Hungarians what time period do you mean?

[@kuro1132]

12th century most likeley. Otherwise Magyars gave them a run for their money

[@tylerellis9097]

12th century wars against the Kingdom of Hungary, not earlier defense against Magyar raids in the 9th-10th centuries

[@makutas-v261]

They will return.

[@AdiR0]

Ranking Ottoman Empire enemies next

[@Ensar_The_Random_Guy]

when ottomans came Byzantine Empire be like:💀 when ottomans with cannons came Byzantine Empire be like:RUN TO ISTANBUL(rn it’s Istanbul)!THEY ARE SHOOtHING CANNONBALLS F***☠️☠️☠️

[@عمرلويسي-ن1ز]

As an Arab I am glad we were there 4 times, but can someone tell me about that battle that you have mentioned?

[@glasbolyas9549]

From what i understand an semi independent emir controling Malatya on the border with the byzantines had been in conflict for years as he attempted to push into byzantine holdings. The emir by the name of Umar Al-Aqta was very powerful thanks to distance from the center of islamic power and was considered one of the greatest threats to the byzantines on there eastern border, Umar initaly overcame byzantine resistance to his invasion reaching the black sea only for a byzantine army lead by the brother inlaw of the Emperor to encircle him near the Lalakon river leading to his defeat and death in battle. The reason the battle is so important despite seeming minor is that it stabilisted the border with the arab caliphates and allowed the byzantines to secure Anatolia. Also without arab pressure the byzantines managed to overcome the bulgarians leading to the latters conversion to orthodoxy and there coming into the byzantine sphere of culture

[@عمرلويسي-ن1ز]

@glasbolyas9549 this is the first time I hear about such a Prince and a battle. Thanks for that

[@cyberWarrior7519]

Actually we Muslims were mentioned almost 5 times

[@عمرلويسي-ن1ز]

@cyberWarrior7519 more, when you add the Seljuks and the Ottomans to us, it will be 6 not 5

[@LUFFYTARO88-ei1ch]

The Sassanids were the biggest and fiercest enemy of the Byzantine Empire.

[@unsupportedletters5561]

I think they were both equal but Sassanids were the ones who weakened them the most, without their wars, arabs would have never been able to disrupt the balance of the region.

[@unsupportedletters5561]

Everyone else kinda struggled for hundreds of years against the Byzantines but they would have been destroyed if the Byzantines hadn’t been weakened and were at the same state as they were fighting Persia.

[@LUFFYTARO88-ei1ch]

@@unsupportedletters5561 yeah I agree

[@cyberWarrior7519]

@@unsupportedletters5561 muslims would have won either way, this “they were weak” is a baseless cope

[@cyberWarrior7519]

@@unsupportedletters5561 also the muslims defeated both the Sassanids and byzantines with no difficulty, so even if they were at their prime it would only increase the difficulty but you would lose at the end

[@Deibi078]

but Belisarius did not have campaign with the visigoths did he? that one was mostly Narses

[@hamishegi9993]

Sassanids 💀

[@Marek_73]

Basil II:🗿

[@Zengi_Atabeg]

just imagine Seljuks (but you have Belisarius)

[@semihbulut7754]

Belisarius 500s seljuks 1000s

[@Zengi_Atabeg]

@@semihbulut7754 I know, but *imagine*

[@theVoid-V]

​​@@Zengi_Atabeg Seljuks would win like Sassanids won against Belisarius, also Totila continously defeated Belisarius.

[@Zengi_Atabeg]

@@theVoid-V but it's also possible that Belisarius would win, because of his strategic brilliance, he retook most of the former Western Roman Empire lands, defeated Vandal king Gelimer, Zabergan and Attila of the Huns, and the Sassanids like in Dara

[@Solo_Turco]

Your name is Zengi Atabeg, why do you ask such a question? Seljuk would easily win with Allah's permission

[@hassasinco3830]

Wait??! Rome started 753 bc ???!! I thought it started 30 bc, I didn't know there was a rome during Alexander the great.

[@driteanimations6330]

You could also add Armenians and Armenians but they help you against Persians.

[@awakenpls]

Hard girmişiz

[@Megadeth0770]

song name in serbs?

[@zoltanperei4789]

As a hungarian i'm surprised we are on the list.

[@kuro1132]

Hát, ja, a 12. századi trónviszályokba gyakran avatkoztak be a bizánciak, határvidékek kölcsönös elfoglalásán kívül sok minden nem történt, ezért nem is értem az értékelést, főleg ha a kalandozó hadjáratokat is idevesszük

[@tylerellis9097]

@@kuro1132Because both John and Manuel Komnenos defeated the Hungarians multiple times, Manuel even taking Bosnia from them with Bela as a hostage who as King was obligated to Send Hungarian soldiers to Byzantine campaigns hence a Hungarian detachment at Myriokephalon. Now obviously Bela was able to reverse Byzantine gains after Manuel died but it didn’t involve field battles and most of the Byzantine conquests were just abandoned instead of fighting Hungary. The Hungarians were able to push to and take Nis but ultimately returned it and agreed to peace and an alliance when Isaac Angelos Became Emperor.

[@kuro1132]

@@tylerellis9097 Yeah, but the video depicts Hungarians as if they were the "easiest" enemies of the Byzantines. When A, if we take Magyars into account, certainly not the case and B, wars were only fought between the two when Hungary was embroiled in civil war. Otherwise, Hungary defeated the Byzantines once or twice in the 11th century

[@tylerellis9097]

@ bro that’s cope Byzantium beat Hungary fair and Square under John and Manuel even when United, both the Royal force under the king and the noble forces coalition. The only noteworthy event in the 11th century was that the Hungarians managed to annex Sirmium and then Belgrade after a hard fought siege in 1071 against the local Byzantine garrison but only kept Sirmium and left Belgrade the next year after being paid a compensation. An event caused by Pechenegs raiding Hungarian territory from Byzantine territory. I wouldn’t say Hungary was the easiest foe but they were never a significant threat for Byzantium and often an ally. Magyars raided everyone and raids are raids. When it came to war they allied with Byzantium against Bulgaria in the 900s which resulted in their migration to Pannonia.

[@marschallhistory3286]

What does Belisarius have to do with the Visigoths? He wasn't there at all when the province of Spania was conquered.

[@alish1907]

Fatih's Cannons😁

[@asaifaji]

1:54 I tought the norman kicked byzantine out of southern italy?

[@kuro1132]

You missed Magyars

[@sourwinee]

Never forget 29 May 1453

[@Nefferious]

The Kievan Rus were easy AF, especially with Tzimiskes 🤷

[@Başibozuk46]

The video was also uploaded by Slavic farmers😂😂😂😂

[@ilayohana3150]

you forgot ck3 (easily the worst)

[@andresmaynez3060]

Should have included Cretan Emirate but you have Nikephoros Phocas

[@Gitsmasher]

1:35 err i dont get it, Franks are troublesome enemies of Byzantine. Even as mercenaries they were hard to control/troublesome. And wheres Alexios Komnenos😅

[@tylerellis9097]

The Franks means Frankish Empire

[@robdenini6972]

i had to laugh at the fourth crusade lolololol pay denbt

[@leoniusmagno]

Umayyads but you have Leo III the Isaurian 😔

[@alejandro3356]

Gladius Romae sum..Belisarius!!

[@dima_playsusa8654]

Rashiduns?????

[@aryosdosandros5331]

Yeh

[@asirry3144]

The Muslims under prophet Muhammed's companions smoked the Romans like it's Thursday.

[@Jibraelaslandshah]

First Muslim caliphate. They defeated them and took Jerusalem in the 7th century I think.

[@arbadon2965]

kahled ibn al-walid the arab commander who destroyed the byzantines at yarmouk and took syria from them

[@9273Lamn]

The first Islamic Caliphate he mean

[@AlirezaShiran-eo8hn]

Why was there no mention of the terrible defeats of Byzantium from Sassanid 😂?

[@Techtalk2030]

Because it makes romaboos cry 😢

[@AlirezaShiran-eo8hn]

@Techtalk2030 😂

[@Alex-tx2em]

@@Techtalk2030 Arabs make Persiaboos cry.

[@imesmuden]

When did the byzantines even fight with the moors wtf

[@rorrikiller8662]

John Troglite

[@Galbaudix]

Battle of mammes (547) siege of cillium (544 AD)

[@imesmuden]

@@Galbaudix Those aren’t moors

[@Galbaudix]

@@imesmuden huh what are you talking about lmao,those battles were between the moors and Byzantines,what's wrong with that?

[@imesmuden]

@ it doesn’t make sense calling north africans moors as they did not convert to islam yet

[@persian_tankman]

My Sassanid Ancestors ❤❤❤

[@Techtalk2030]

We wuz shahs

[@AlptheSpearo]

Türkler ☠️🔥

[@Killer25669]

Kievan rus(but you have john i tzimiskes):😎 Seljuks(but you have alexios i & manuel i komnenos's):😈

[@Dawahfr]

At the end, true monotheism won.

[@hạt_cải]

Reconquista ✝️🇪🇸🔥🔥

[@zakialmahin7278]

​@@hạt_cảihe wasn't talking about the recinquesta. How is it like to lose one of your most important Christian city of Constantinople

[@hopeundertheblacksun]

​@@zakialmahin7278how is it like being colonised 💀?

[@hopeundertheblacksun]

Islam is trash

[@vonschmoth441]

​@@hopeundertheblacksun how is it being the prodcut of ancestrial inbreeding and a evolutionary dead end?

[@bencokacilim6052]

No Huns?

[@TheSublimeEmir]

1456 Cope Syndrome :

[@VAZZ8876]

anyone have the metal track list 😂

[@mehmetali1042pro]

2:02 SELÇUKLUUU

[@BayGrishnackh]

2:41

[@MH_PERSIAN]

Sasanid but they have sapur i💀☠

[@shia-s6c]

تو وقتی میفهمی ویدیو راجب دسمنان بیزانسه نه روم و شاپور یکم ۹۰ سال قبل از بیزانس بوده :

[@MH_PERSIAN]

@shia-s6c اصل جنگ بیزانس با پارت ها بود و اینکه اگرم دقت کنی تو ویدیو دشمنان رومشون ساسانی رو نزاشته بودن

[@MH_PERSIAN]

برو تو ویدیو در مورد رومشون ساسانی رو پیدا کردی بیا بهت تیتاب بدم😂تو درست میگی ولی میشه زیر ویدیویی که هیچ اسمی از ساسانی نبرده کامنت در موردش گذاشت؟​@shia-s6c

[@MH_PERSIAN]

@shia-s6c برو ویدیو رومشونو ببین ساسانیان توش بود بهت تیتاب میدم البته تو درست میگی ولی تو اون ویدیو اسمی از ساسانی نبرده پس چرا باید کامنت ساسانی بزارم🚬🗿

[@shia-s6c]

@HANI-xq4zn اره ولی ساسانیان در مقابل کی ؟ زیر ویدیو نوشته بیزانس نه روم

[@Eastern_Orthodox_Türk]

As a Christian I agree with the last Szene🤫but still love the Byzantines🇬🇷☦️❤️‍🔥

[@tausifchowdhury8180]

Wait a minute. Hold up. How...what... What are you?? Seeing quite possibly the biggest enemy of Orthodox Christianity put right beside a picture of Christ is incredibly cursed. So, pray tell how it came to be. I don't mean to be offensive or anything but what really is going on. How can an orthodox Christian put the flag of Turkey in their PF

[@KananovOffical]

​@@tausifchowdhury8180 Turkish Orthodox Church.

[@turkiyeturkeyturkish]

Onemli olan Turkluktur din degildir❤Istanbulun fethinde bir suru hristiyan topcu yardim etti

[@BayGrishnackh]

2:02

[@DenizErenOzer-b9p]

as a turk respect greeks

[@ocelot3286]

Sg

[@DenizErenOzer-b9p]

@ baris dusmani cahil

[@ocelot3286]

@@DenizErenOzer-b9p domal böyle aferin

[@DenizErenOzer-b9p]

@@ocelot3286 parani verimde karnini doyur ;)