Best Lenses for Pet Photography

[@staceybarrett2019]

I’m just beginning a pet photography business. Your Instagram has been super inspirational, and I’m so happy to find your KZbin videos! Thank you so much for sharing your insights 💜🐾📸

[@b7730]

The 135mm perspective is always so special. One thing to remember is, that you can get the "same" look with any 135mm lens (from any manufacturer) but you won´t get the same autofocus performance. Static shots are no problem but e.g. shots of a running dog (or any moving subject) are usually achieved only with the higher end, and more expensive lenses. That Sony 85mm 1.8 is really, really good for the price.

[@heathermtaylor7683]

Absolutely correct. Nikon bodies certainly don't respond well with third party lenses when shooting with Auto-Focus and using the AF back button - definitely something to bear in mind.

[@InspawrationPhotography]

@@b7730 yep for sure. I don’t like going specifically into one brand or another because so many camera brands have different lens models that work or need adapters etc so was avoiding opening that Pandora’s box 😅

[@PhilSledge]

I agree that primes are generally more affordable than zooms. However, I would recommend starting with the 70-200mm 2.8 lens and gradually expanding your collection. That way, you can build a versatile setup that suits your needs. Great video and excellent advie as awlays

[@InspawrationPhotography]

@@PhilSledge yes possibly! I had a 70-200 for a while however once I got my 85mm (and afterwards, my 135mm) I never used my 70-200mm again 😂

[@MrSimonj1970]

The Viltrox 85mm f/1.8 is an amazing lens for a very cheap price! I got a used one for £250 and it's 95% as good as the Nikon version that costs a lot more.

[@rennhor]

Recently my cousin lent me his 70-200mm f4 lens. Having been only using 35 and 50 in the studio, the 70-200 allows me to take pictures outdoors for a better shot. I wish I could get a 2.8 or 1.8 in the future, as I do struggle with ISO with the f4 having to push it up to 3200-6400, but it's still nice having a 70-200 to play with.

[@TheWescombe]

Love the images, but what about DOF with f1.8, how much of the dog is in focus?

[@InspawrationPhotography]

@@TheWescombe how long is a piece of string 😉 if I’m far away, all of the dog will be in focus. If I’m doing head and shoulders, then probably just the eyes. Which is fine by me. I don’t care if the nose is out of focus. That isn’t where I want my audience to look 😉

[@roman_the_rescuer]

Ive used a canon eos rebel t18, and honestly, ive got some really good photos off of it. editing makes a HUGE difference tho.👍🏻

[@adrianfaulkner1353]

I have the Sigma 85mm f1.4 DG DN for my dog photography business I would love the sony 135mm but I feel like it could be restricted because it's too long of a focul length I'm just not sure but the sigma is very sharp👍

[@InspawrationPhotography]

I think the Sigma is sharp! It's slower than the Sony so not great for action photos but for portraits it's perfectly fine. You could look into renting a 135mm to see if the focal length is for you!

[@timtog]

What the 135 like if you want to catch a fast moving dog. I am looking at the Sony FE 70-200mm f2.8 G Master OSS II or the Sony 135

[@InspawrationPhotography]

@@timtog the 135mm is an extremely fast lens! The 70-200 ii is also great. I know Chris van riel who is a friend of mine & action photographer who has been doing a series of webinars thru my site, uses the 135mm rather than a 70-200mm. So the 135mm is definitely a great lens for action if you can be close enough (it’s not ideal for agility or disc etc necessarily as you’re a bit too far away, but then even 200mm can be a bit short in that case!)

[@RohanGillett]

It would be really helpful if you time-stamped your videos. Then we could skip to what we need rather than watch everything (which can be a waste of time).

[@heathermtaylor7683]

What you say about the camera body and the lens is absolutely right. I use a Nikon D3 (2007 ancient lump: £300 second hand) with the latest Nikon 70mm-200mm F2.8E FL ED VR2 (£2,000). Absolutely stunning lens and very, very fast with beautiful bokeh.

[@InspawrationPhotography]

It's crazy right?! I think camera companies do such a good job marketing cameras, and encouraging people to get new cameras, when what people should be putting their attention toward (more often than not) is a better lens! NOT a new camera with another kit lens!

[@heathermtaylor7683]

@@InspawrationPhotography - Could not agree more. The D3 has its limitations being a 2007 body but with the newest and best 70mm-200mm lens it shines. Another great video and I am so pleased you have highlighted the importance of good quality lenses over the newest, latest camera body. Thank you 😊