Raise your hand if you’re such a big StarTalk fan that you already knew everything in this video🙋
@PstJstd3 жыл бұрын
🙋
@CliffordJohnstonVIP0073 жыл бұрын
I remember when you dropped these individually ha-ha. good to have some recap!
@theduder26173 жыл бұрын
Well to be honest, I am learning or at least trying to learn about the contents of this video. To say I "know" would be dishonest. But I know those educated enough to investigate black holes understand what they are discussing, so I listen with complete focus. I'm making effort, so that counts a little bit. lol
@marble253 жыл бұрын
I am sure most of us don't know what uncertainty principle is and why it exists. Would be great if Neil explained this to Chuck. If Chuck can gets it, rest assured we all will. :)
@_leokratis_3 жыл бұрын
🙋
@simon-white3 жыл бұрын
We need more Janna Levin collabs, she's a stellar science communicator.
@Dynamic0NE3 жыл бұрын
Not to mention drop dead gorgeous.....a woman with the type of open minded thinking she has mixed with her looks is the perfect woman in my opinion.
@trigonzobob3 жыл бұрын
I see what you did, there
@DavidHanniganJr3 жыл бұрын
Yeah because she's a "stroller" fox.
@power20843 жыл бұрын
she's hot
@MiserableLemon3 жыл бұрын
she's so dope
@ThatNerdChris3 жыл бұрын
Black holes are so cool! Hard to believe something like that actually exists.
@dragonslayerwill_travel34763 жыл бұрын
Black holes don't actually exist! It's only theoretical there are no proof of black holes existence! The Electric Universe is more probable! 🕳️
@@dragonslayerwill_travel3476 they've been observed & consensus places them at the center of most galaxies
@ejmtv33 жыл бұрын
even Einstein didnt believe it is possible.
@Broockle3 жыл бұрын
@@dragonslayerwill_travel3476 u'r a fruit please learn the meaning of a "theory" and of the "scientific method"
@HilariousGameEdits3 жыл бұрын
When I sit thru a high school science class all I ever learned was how long a minute could feel. When i watch 5 minutes of star talk I wonder how school got it so wrong. I love you guys and truly appreciate the everything you guys give us. Please please don’t stop
@inertiaforce78462 жыл бұрын
That's because school sucks. Real knowledge is attained from one's own interest, not by force, threat, or coercion.
@ZeroFlowers2 жыл бұрын
@@inertiaforce7846 facts
@crithon3 жыл бұрын
"I can't let Chuck Nice lose a brain gasket here, I need him for another show."
@caveman12263 жыл бұрын
“Once you go black, you never go back.” - Neil deGrasse Tyson, 2021
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 жыл бұрын
Black car, Black hair, Black coffee, Black lung, Black death, 🤔 This went sideways...
@cchosch3 жыл бұрын
Time stamp?
@caveman12263 жыл бұрын
@@cchosch was paraphrasing 0:25-0:50. Didn’t actually say that but you KNOW they were both thinking it.
@Geezer-yf8hv3 жыл бұрын
So true!!!
@israeltorres35923 жыл бұрын
We just say it how it is......
@dustinpaulson11233 жыл бұрын
I heard that if you threw Eminem into a black hole, you'd get to witness the first "Mom's spaghettification".
@EaastonCams3 жыл бұрын
Niceee
@Kaneblade073 жыл бұрын
Well played
@user-oi6ec8ge4c3 жыл бұрын
High school science teacher jokes are like dad jokes on steroids
@kikijihan83163 жыл бұрын
@@user-oi6ec8ge4c Maybe you mean...."a"steroids :3
@user-oi6ec8ge4c3 жыл бұрын
@@kikijihan8316 boooooooo
@James-Lee-Smith3 жыл бұрын
Chuck Nice is probably the most scientifically literate non-scientist on KZbin. And, I agree with whomever commented below that we need more Janna content. She is fantastic.
@Kube_Dog7 ай бұрын
He's the pothole in the road of an interesting discussion.
@TheRabbitRonin3 жыл бұрын
1:36 I like when they have animations to show/explain what they're talking about. I wish they would do that more often.
@shawndorkoff39793 жыл бұрын
I never miss a show. Thank you guys for all u do!!!!!
@StarTalk3 жыл бұрын
We appreciate you, Shawn! Thank YOU!
@robelw52873 жыл бұрын
Me too. I never miss a show.
@AlpaOmega-nb5jm7 ай бұрын
Well I guess if bull crap is what you like
@christophero38693 жыл бұрын
Jesus Christ, he’s recited his spiel about spaghettification so many times he’s starting to turn it into a poem 🤣
@jae28833 жыл бұрын
We need more cosmic queries!!! Also more Chuck Nice.
@JasonM693 жыл бұрын
Yes
@mikehoncho81903 жыл бұрын
I concor
@wehttamretrac16093 жыл бұрын
🤌👌👏
@StarTalk3 жыл бұрын
We can do that. :)
@mahatma19893 жыл бұрын
@@StarTalk asap, thanks.
@Lee-ng8eq3 жыл бұрын
Love love love when Janna Levin is on Startalk. An incredibly clever woman. I could listen to NDT, Chuck and Janna forever, probably about any subject!
@jimmybrungus25523 жыл бұрын
Lofi background is a nice touch. Then again lofi goes good with almost anything.
@MikeJamesMedia3 жыл бұрын
You had me at "Janna Levin". Please have her on the show more. She's soooooo informative and fun at the same time. And... Somebody please get Chuck a mic that doesn't distort so much. :)
@austingirdner923 жыл бұрын
Love when Jenna comes thru with the physics for the win! Never miss an ep, but love the Jenna explainer shows!
@dezaraydunigan80283 жыл бұрын
This brings me joy. I'm very happy to watch! 💖
@TheOkieLife3 жыл бұрын
This is the only science show I can watch without cool graphics and not even once think of changing to the next video. Thank you, from a 7 year fan!
@erikhendrickson593 жыл бұрын
The more I learn about black holes the more fascinating they become!
@andersonbroxson17553 жыл бұрын
i've been waiting for something like this!
@StarTalk3 жыл бұрын
Happy to hear that, Anderson!
@andersonbroxson17553 жыл бұрын
@@StarTalk Do questions come from comments or Patreon?
@StarTalk3 жыл бұрын
@@andersonbroxson1755 Cosmic Queries are always from our Patreon community (www.patreon.com/startalkradio). Once in a while, we'll ask our Twitter and/or Instagram audience too!
@andersonbroxson17553 жыл бұрын
@@StarTalk Okay good to know thanks!
@flowahpawah53973 жыл бұрын
I hope neil is able to see this, i really hope i am able to meet you sometime! I currently live in Norway, but i would love to come to wherever you live just to learn from you, study your theories and become much more informative on space and time! Love you neil...
@TheRealLifeMods3 жыл бұрын
A photon is it's own anti-particle?! Damn that's so cool
@JJs_playground3 жыл бұрын
Ya i didn't know that. How does that work?
@hw_yozoraVODS3 жыл бұрын
@@JJs_playground something about them being truly neutral particles.
@TheRealLifeMods3 жыл бұрын
@@hw_yozoraVODS if anti-matter is considered matter going backwards through time, and a photon experiences all of it's moments instantaneously, what I get from the fact that a photon is an anti-particle is that not only does it conform to causality (A happens before B which happens before C) even though it experiences A, B, and C, at the same instant, but it also works reverse. Since A, B, and C all occur at the same instant, not only does A occur before B but it also is equally true that B occurs before A. At least that's what I gleam from what I already know about this stuff.
@ip56763 жыл бұрын
Don't quote me but I guess that, since they act as waves, two waves of the same frequency but opposite phase would cancel each other out.
@chikenarch3 жыл бұрын
The joy I feel every time I see Janna come up in a video 😌
@ikitclaw71463 жыл бұрын
She has the big brain, amazing charisma such passion for her work shes funny and so beautiful! Janna and Triple Chuck are my fave episodes.
@klaxoncow3 жыл бұрын
"We're going to take another break" Video ends. Well, this is going to be quite a long ad break.
@Dsrgreyy3 жыл бұрын
Lol I’ve done that on stream a few times
@danrazART3 жыл бұрын
This is an edited re upload.
@sapelesteve3 жыл бұрын
After watching this video, I can strongly relate to Chuck and how he feels! 🤔🤔👍👍
@lp43523 жыл бұрын
1st off.... Thanx Neil and Chuck for reingniting my passion for not just astronomy but science period! 2nd... We need more janna segments! She communicates in a way that shows she really knows her s**t, but puts it in a way that's so understandable! Not just saying that because I have a HUGE "hot for teacher" crush on her lol. #MoreJanna
@JP1NYC3 жыл бұрын
Black hole: "It is the human version of the roach motel."
@99Michaelthom2 жыл бұрын
So, question: If you were able to traverse near a black hole and move in orbit around it, would you be able to visually see a change as its dust debris disc or whatever may be shifts in perspective? I would imagine the gravitational lensing effect follows your point of view as your position moves, but would you see a visual change the way you might when orbiting Saturn from one pole to another?
@jajuanrussell53863 жыл бұрын
Well well well. I asked the question, "the stuff that goes in a black hole, is it better or worse when it leaves," and here is a really informative explanation in mind blowing fashion. I swyped all that to say thanks to all the people it took to get this video posted today. Thank you. Especially thanks to Neil Tyson and Chuck. Thanks to Chuck for taking the words out of my mouth hours before I even knew this video existed. My reaction matched Chuck's reaction identically 🤣
@zdeneksolnicka68153 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another perfect explanation, could you please cut the MUSIC IN BACKGROUND ? Thanks
@davidgutnik3 жыл бұрын
One thing I'd like him to talk about.... Do we actually know what gravity is? We know how it behaves but do we actually know how one object actually effects another object. Like do "graviton" particles exist? Does gravity have a speed effect? Or is there a time delay in its effect?
@M4nusky3 жыл бұрын
AFAIK we know a good chunk about it. The warping of spacetime due to mass, the speed (speed of light), The delay (because of said speed). that the spinning of objects wrinkles the spacetime as well since it's not all smooth and instantaneous etc. for graviton not yet but Higgs (for mass) has been around for a while.
@JKole6143 жыл бұрын
A StarTalk about Space Lets Gooooooooooo
@elisabetrouge Жыл бұрын
Humans are so unfathomably tiny. I love how we've learned so much. It's just enough to know there's so much we not only don't know but can't know. It's so true it's a rule with a name. My brain gasket was blown a long time ago.
@righty-o35853 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the super massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, only has a diameter barely as big as the orbit of Mercury, and our ENTIRE solar system compared to the Milky Way is a tiny little pixel. Just a barely visible dot. I mean our entire galaxy is 100 thousand light years across, and the diameter of our solar system out to the orbit of Neptune, is just about 1 light year across. So in other words, the super massive black hole at our center is actually very tiny , relatively speaking.
@laurapope3685 Жыл бұрын
This was an awesome video, I learned a lot and it was super entertaining! I look forward to your uploads and can't wait for the next!
@kirubeltadele60723 жыл бұрын
I like this show #1 from youtube very learning and entertaining . I like neil and chack from Ethiopia.
@hullinstruments3 жыл бұрын
When you said “surface gravity”… That made a lot of sense to me . Kind of comparing it in my mind to the surface tension of water
@ThorPalsson3 жыл бұрын
Oh snap! new Startalk format!
@kaushik-sarkar-droid3 жыл бұрын
I already have a playlist of Janna in StarTalk. I like to add more videos on that playlist please 🙂.
@ananth8072 жыл бұрын
I only wish schools made science so fun and interesting to little kids as these three people. I am a 45 year old guy with no great science background but gee it makes me feel like I need to go back to uni and learn it the proper way. Kudos to Startalk
@shaquan98933 жыл бұрын
I will never get tired of learning about black holes
@Seehart3 жыл бұрын
Question: Consider the set of all spacetime points that are simultaneous with me now (in my reference frame) . That set is a 3-brane in spacetime. Call it "Now". Now is a boundary separating two spacetime regions: past and future. Does that 3-brane "Now" intersect any event horizon of any black hole? If not, what is the formal justification asserting that black holes exist? To be clear, by "exist", I mean "exist now". Note that I am presuming that all of the evidence for black holes is entirely acurate and that the generally accepted model for the phenomenon of black holes is accurate and supported by that evidence. I'm specifically nitpicking at the use of the word "exist", which I take to mean "simultaneous with me now".
@andypeiffer53 жыл бұрын
Great thumbnail btw. I like this new style
@Tina-d8f5 ай бұрын
Excellent work
@BlackSunCompany3 жыл бұрын
Not sure if the "wormhole" explanation is the best to use in this case. It would probably be better to at least peer down the rabbit hole of the holographic principle. To summarize as I understand it, since the quantum information cannot be destroyed or otherwise cannot reach the infinite far future (being cut off from our spacetime), it instead remains encoded at the event horizon. Information about a 3D object can be described just on a 2D plane; entanglements between the particles of the object that fell in are lost (since it's smeared across the surface and is decoherent) but the information is preserved. That information at the event horizon can still escape via Hawking radiation - the radiation takes that quantum information away where it either escapes or is recaptured by the black hole where it can escape again. I don't have a fundamental mathematical understanding on this, just a high-level view on the principles, so please correct if I'm wrong or left something out.
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 жыл бұрын
What if... What if they are both describing the same exact thing? Like, the holographic principle is the _phonograph,_ for lack of better ideas, that the Hawking radiation is tuned with when it is created close enough to the event horizon. If it's not close enough, then this effect wouldn't work, the antiparticle falling in doesn't affect it. So, this could be the way to tell. Look for Hawking radiation that forms just outside the event horizon, as opposed to on it. If it's there then no holograph. However, if the idea of protracted infinity as the singularity, was replaced with a quantumly random teleporter, where the information from matter falling in is pushed right back out again as these already tuned Hawking particles, then you solve the problem of needing a holographic membrane. Or they are just two different frameworks for talking about the same thing.
@kenwoods95032 жыл бұрын
Sand clock anyone or do you prefer gears n cogs to run the clock image, the field you read or glass containing the sand only in a natural state and you can't tangibly test blackholes biggest bonkers ever, so do you mean light holographic or holographic matter an exotic matter in the blackholes field?
@neilkennykenny411311 ай бұрын
Love these 2.
@synchro-dentally19653 жыл бұрын
Does the expansion of spacetime vary depending on the distance from a black hole?
@wildmanjeff423 жыл бұрын
Thank you guys for all the videos--
@paprikasings3 жыл бұрын
I’m buying Neil’s latest book this month. I haven’t even got it but I knew it would be worth every penny.
@chromabotia3 жыл бұрын
A slick mashup from other Star Talk shows, kinda interesting with high post production values, even a little animation. Neil is the best, but I kinda like the old format. Cheers!
@clarkgrayhame12503 жыл бұрын
That was both funny and very informative. Can't get enough about black holes.
@rjvalle80943 жыл бұрын
On the other side of a black hole is Dr. Tysons amazing collection of things he has in the background of all his star talk videos!
@prestokrevlar3 жыл бұрын
What a cool mashup, this is so fun.
@LeoandLongevity3 жыл бұрын
Who knew I was looking for poetry on black holes…
@melchiabban11223 жыл бұрын
Pls where can I get an explanation videos made by the lady. I love the way she explains things
@bhaskardevaghar3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@Azmoth_8 ай бұрын
That's a lot. Can I please get some? Thank you!
@nibussss3 жыл бұрын
Nic explanation of Hawking radiation
@HiddenPalm3 жыл бұрын
Great episode.
@Geezer-yf8hv3 жыл бұрын
“It’s even worse than that”! Chuck’s reaction=🤣🤣🤣
@cinbro30803 жыл бұрын
Thank you both. I love this channel.
@ItzBakeYT3 жыл бұрын
These videos have came so far.
@omgIoIwtf3 жыл бұрын
that really was mind blowing info
@manfredgedeik31243 жыл бұрын
I'm fascinated that they spin so fast. A black hole in the Milky Way, GRS 1915+105, may rotate 1,150 times per second, approaching the theoretical upper limit.
@FrozenLabRat2 жыл бұрын
Why does black holes always show us the black, empty part? I mean if it can absorb anything around it, wouldn't it be a sphere of light when we observe it? And can a black hole be hidden in such sphere?
@Rhekon3 жыл бұрын
I imagine surface gravity is a convenient term while memorizing formulas in class and discussing massive, large objects. Shouldn't we have a different name for the surface gravity of a black hole? Maybe call it event horizon gravity or something lol
@roblewis7983 жыл бұрын
Whoa. I need to digest this... whoa.... ok watching again....
@shroomzy50003 жыл бұрын
Chucks clip @ 2:20 is the best part of this whole video. Possibility of changing my mind is excluded by the uncertainty principle, therefore remains at 0%
@SentinelGhost3 жыл бұрын
The thing that always confused me about hawking radiation is that if the information radiated does not originate from inside the black hole, and particles of matter are still falling into the singularly, then how does that cause the black hole to lose mass and evaporate?
@theduder26173 жыл бұрын
I suspect it is due to the energy loss from the spontaneous creation of the escaping particle. (e=mc2) It takes an insanely long time for a black hole to evaporate. If I remember correctly, such a long time that all nearby matter would have long ago been consumed to the point where nothing else is falling in, which finally allows it to evaporate. I have heard that as of today, no black hole has evaporated away, therefore it is only the math talking in regards to the death of a black hole. We may end up making a discovery which renders the math faulty, the same as the math may end up being verified through observation. Personally, I believe the math. But am open to all potential discoveries yet to occur.
@Denosophem2 жыл бұрын
The correct answer to every solution is the exact task we are resentful of from the moment the experiment begins
@preceptorprime28943 жыл бұрын
This video is dope.
@ejmtv33 жыл бұрын
6:52 I died at this part! XD
@parveshkhatri10273 жыл бұрын
If the BH steals one particle from 2 popping out of uncertainty, does the mass of BH increases or decreases with time?
@Robert_McGarry_Poems3 жыл бұрын
Those are pairs of (matter/antimatter) being pulled apart. The uncertainty is where they will appear. On the event horizon, and the matter can escape, while the antimatter falls in. This removes matter from the BH, and energy from it's system. This energy comes from the mass of the black hole. It causes frame dragging, and this causes quantum mechanics to turn excess energy into (matter/antimatter) particles. So the larger, and faster spinning, the more Hawking radiation. The only thing that makes sense to talk about, from our point of view, is when the antiparticle falls into said BH. The first matter that it touches annihilates it. Making the system a net loss for the BH. Like a particle leaving, which is sort of what's happening. The other way around is like a particle entering, and that would add mass to the BH, annihilate mass outside it, and steal energy from the system. I don't think we observe this happening. Both scenarios seem very counter intuitive. Let's just be thankful that they aren't runaway self perpetuating monsters.
@DFloyd843 жыл бұрын
I think that a black hole's mass does decrease through this process. But since it's occurring at the quantum level and BH's are silly huge, it would take a one-solar-mass BH something like 10^64 years to completely evaporate. The universe is only 1.3x10^9 years old.
@shanedesilva63073 жыл бұрын
I really loved this episode!!
@thehonorablejiveturkey60683 жыл бұрын
Man I tell you this guy is my favorite this guy
@kevinblandondallatorre50113 жыл бұрын
I have a question for you Mr. Tyson. If the revolution speed of earth is determined by the mass sitting inside the orbit, what is the rotation speed of each planet on its axis determined by??
@josephlawson17963 жыл бұрын
Neil has become a pretty good comedian. Also, It's quite an achievement to get Dr, Tyson to use profane language.
@vincentr903 жыл бұрын
Is there any practical use or any use of hawking radiation?
@yourguard43 жыл бұрын
well, you could harvest it for energy
@notthemessiah92432 жыл бұрын
What if particles in a black hole are forced into the quantum layer where they resurface elsewhere as hydrogen which accumulates into stars? Like pushing a floating object under Ice and it popping up out of a different hole
@degrit19503 жыл бұрын
1) The series is great! 2) More Chuck Nice. 3) Just HOW is Dr. Hibbert NOT based on Dr. Tyson?
@taliachetty54173 жыл бұрын
Loveeeeeee!... Startalk be the best ❤️
@quasar46013 жыл бұрын
Thank you !!! For bringing my science knowledge up to a High School level from about a 4th grade one lol Did you know I have 40 pages of personal notes from everyone of your explainers
@TheFaarf3 жыл бұрын
40 Pages? Thats dedication, well done! Now I am curious as to what you've written, would be nice to see it :D
@quasar46013 жыл бұрын
@@TheFaarf I just written notes from exactly from the shows Only the explainer ones !! I need to glance at them again lol At the equator : are the days always close to 12 and 12 of day and night. ??
@guitartrav42993 жыл бұрын
Mind completely blown 🤯🤯🤯🤯
@shivayveer Жыл бұрын
hawking radiation question not able to get answers. At event horizon anti particle is created in event horizon and particle outside the mass of the black hole decreases. Same logic can happen if particle is created inside the event horizon and anti particle outside the mass of the black hole will increase. How we are able to say no anti particles created inside the event horizon will be more then particles
@endeavor443 жыл бұрын
Since chuck has a Star Talk with Neil deGrasse Tyson shirt, why doesn't Neil have on a "Star Talk with Chuck Nice" shirt??? We need answers
@Keytap153 жыл бұрын
The original shirt said Star Talk with Neil deGrasse Tyson and Chuck Nice but a black hole stole part of it and what Chuck is wearing now is the result of Hawking Radiation.
@Dsrgreyy3 жыл бұрын
@@Keytap15 I see what you did there
@whatabouttheearth3 жыл бұрын
Chuck should be on at least every other show!!!
@DaBlondDude3 жыл бұрын
Gravity & black holes are illusions? *blinking* that's quite the band-aid. I love Janna Levin episodes; great explanations and cool sense of humour.
@kenwoods95032 жыл бұрын
Blackholes do look like mirages to me or similar to it in terms of light refraction or Rayleigh effect, plus all light that enters the horizon field may be fusing/merging with the core not like normal stars which repel non fuel material to cycle another source, light itself may be a blackholes main diet.
@anujprasad001 Жыл бұрын
HI Neil I hope it reaches you... Why is it that we predominantly observe the emission of light and radiation from black holes in the form of a bright, flattened disk (an accretion disk) in two planes perpendicular to each other, rather than perceiving them as uniformly bright celestial objects with darkness inside due to gravitational pull, leading to the expectation of a complete, spherical bright appearance when observed from outside the event horizon? In this scenario, a black hole might just appear like a star from a viewer's perspective because the gravity is same in all direction thus forming "n" number of planes and thus "n" number of accretion disks. The thought is giving me hard time since long time and mainly after I read "A brief history of time".
@hannieblackthorn52182 ай бұрын
ok, ive got a hypothesis for you supernovas are produced from the rebound of a star falling and hitting its own core what would happen when matter travelling near the speed of light, falling into a black hole from its accretion disk strikes a hypothetical surface and rebounds, interacting with all of the other rebounding matter as well as the magnetic field and the warping of space-time itself? could this rebound "exhaust" be whats channeled through the the magnetic poles into jets? as a sinks stream rebounds off the small opening of a wine bottle?
@macironiminer93383 жыл бұрын
2:19 I remember this in the Halloween regular show special !
@MasCoffeeTV2 жыл бұрын
I was curious, what happens when a black hole dies? or Do they last forever? Are they replaced with something else and do they age like the rest of the universe? Love your videos. Bob.
@jefferyneu39153 жыл бұрын
So, now we have to add poet to all of the other amazing things about Dr. Tyson!😱👍
@jewellcarpenter67643 жыл бұрын
Keep on keeping on inspiring and theorizing. #lovestartalk
@derekb46403 жыл бұрын
🙋🏻♂️ One question though on the spagettification effect of a human falling into a black hole. Assuming you have ample air and are protected from harmful rays (X, G or otherwise)…as time slows the closer you get to a gravitational force, would an average person die of old age first or spagettification? How long would it take to get to the point of spagettification, quickly due to gravity or years due to the time dilation? 🤔
@aashwi2162 жыл бұрын
There is no aging. Time nearly stops or u can say EXTREMELY slows down in a black hole so one doesn't age. Hence dying due to aging isn't possible.
@kenwoods95032 жыл бұрын
@@aashwi216 time and radioactive decay aren't the same last time I checked, like a blackhole is a habitat void of matter I wouldn't say time at least until its tangibly graspable in a experiment, for now let's say decay since humans decay faster in space I'd say yes interstellar movie did show this though its based on habitat how that effects decay I'd say read Superman I dunno decay rate is positive or negative based on environment to my observation of patterns.
@AnonyMous-nl7ig2 жыл бұрын
Is there a visible underside to black holes.
@JimThomasOutdoors Жыл бұрын
Is the black hole comprised of atoms that have been collapsed so much that they are no longer atoms but rather just quantum particles ? And did Janna say that quantum entanglement is suspended / separated below the event horizon only to be re-entangled when expelled from the black hole ?
@ttsuter876 ай бұрын
Ignoring the spaghettification and horrible drawn out death and other physics, if I were to hold a chunk of matter with black hole density, let’s say it’s a 2” sphere, how much would that weigh? I have a 2” ball of pure tungsten, which is one of the denser metals in the periodic table. It weighs a just under 3lb. How much would black hole matter weigh and what would its density be?
@SmokingCoffee3 жыл бұрын
I have a question.We are most likely certain that all things have a point of collapse, and so a black hole that consumes everything even light should be getting bigger and bigger until it some ''time'' collapses.Yet we see black holes ruling as the rotation axis/engine of gallaxies and we see nothing radiatiating or coming out of it in any way.We also know that black holes can merge and still not collapse.But since the gravity gets so strong and it curves the space-time so much, can't we suppose that, even if a black hole collapsed and started exposing its devoured particles, relatively quickly if regarded from its theoritical centre, this could be exposed really really later at the age of the universe? Meaning that no black hole in the universe (what we have observed) is old enough to die because there hasn't been much time? Just a thought.
@gasaholic473 жыл бұрын
I’m about halfway through Death by Black Hole. Terrific book.
@jpteknoman3 жыл бұрын
here's a question. if the singularity at the center of a black hole had the size of the sun, how much mass would that be and how vast the event horizon would be?
@john_boy31353 жыл бұрын
You should make a video explaining hydrogen wave function