The Mystery Lady - SleepyCast

[@ALovelyLad]

I found this in a playlist regarding the album ‘In the Court of the Crimson King’, I love Oney and the boys but this completely threw me off guard

[@Operation_Bagel]

Of course shad wouldn’t like what Chris said because it wasn’t a little girl doing that

[@BanilyaGorilya]

I listen to this podcast when I'm at work. Two to four episodes equals one of my shifts. Then the five hour season finale is the other shift.

[@gamemaster2311]

Chris Benson I did that when I was stocking at the hospital for a summer, it's the only reason I didn't take one of those scalpels to my throat.

[@SlayClay117]

I listen to podcasts at my job ( service agent for a rental car company) and SleepyCast was and is my daily podcast bread. Hilarious. Also if somehow Sirius XM is left on a car you can listen to that shit.

[@SlayClay117]

SleepyCast is also weird because it is like infinitely funny. I can relisten to one episode weeks or months later and still laugh.

[@OBSMProductions]

People wonder how I can listen to podcasts so much, so I assume they've never seen this.

[@ChitterChatterD]

Fruits and produce weren't necessarily bred selectively for looks but to produce more edible pulp, sweeter and have less seeds

[@worldstrongestbillionaire]

Some of Cory’s hypotheticals sound similar to Deus Ex

[@janordanu2008]

I disagree with Shad he just sounded very pretentious. Chris made more sense. People will have baby skin their entire lives eventually or something

[@IronicHavoc]

Shad did have a point. But he was being pretentious about it.

[@IronicHavoc]

Chris's initial point doesn't totally hold up. Monkeys were attractive to monkeys at that point in their evolution. Standards of attractiveness also evolve through natural selection over time. It's a desirable trait to be attracted to traits that suit your environment. Those standards can and have changed even over the course of evolution and human history. Saying humans have evolved to more attractive is sort of circular/chicken and egg logic. We've evolved to be attracted to the traits we currently have now and that's how we got them. That said Chris did have a good broader point, I think they were probably just considering different time scales. Chris is probably right about the next immediate steps in human evolution, shad might be right long term for humanity. Problem is shad was more dismissive than he ought to be.

[@mr.moseby2456]

We are evolving into weaker yet hyper intelligent beings who will be more adept with technology and live longer due to the lack of toil on our bodies that would strain and destroy previous generations.

[@djspit8929]

Very insightful, Hotel Manager. Your knowledge is graced by Shao Kahn.

[@Eboyd1100]

shad is not as smart as he thinks he is

[@poppysilver]

yeah I was thinking this listening to him ramble on about pure shite

[@AnimeSprings]

He's far less than smart by anyone's standards, for a number of reasons

[@janordanu2008]

Reague of Regends Freddie Freaker 😭

[@rock3793]

yea hes the most annoying unfunny member

[@ItsJustMilkISwear]

breaking news: man who draws cocks on anime girls for a living is not an expert in evolutionary biology.

[@SleepyCrow98]

I was expecting to laugh but got a meaningful conversation with laughs. Huh. I guese you can have your cake and eat it too.

[@Biodeamon]

oh we're definitely gonna live. for better or worse humans endure. but I love the fact checking added about the New World as if anybody would take this seriously. This certainly had the danger of being super depressing though. Good thing the unpredictability of life blew it out of the water.

[@chgerhardt]

There's yeast in beer

[@ButterZack]

shad use big word to sound smart

[@FunkyGhostHD]

shadman? more like addictman

[@videonmode8649]

We'll probably lose our pinky finger in our evolution

[@helanthros]

curiosity as if i cannot hear you wait there's one more thing

[@Biodeamon]

I wouldn't worry about getting too comfortable. 2020 has proven that. And brains isn't always better than brawn. Cybernetics is a false messiah though. its too expensive and difficult to maintain, as well as gives up your freedom. Bio engineering is the way to go. But the future does exist as time is circular. we can't see it though.

[@Chibblechabble]

Need the source

[@MrHymensmasher]

1:10

[@Tunkkis]

Much of this is just bullshit with them not totally understanding evolution. 'Twas entertaining none the less, so oh well.

[@ArinJager1]

evolution takes too much time (is slow) and people don't evolve anymore (they degenerate) or the evolution is so slow that it's like it stopped... so we have to take it in our own hand and evolve ourselves by technology (3D printing organs and shit)

[@ArinJager1]

@Jay you're stupid... human genome is only getting shorter and shorter by the minute, it's not like the huge as fuck genome of primitive lifeforms (e.g.: amoeba) compared to chode-short human genome... There isn't much of a potential in human genome -_-

[@Olivia-ot6up]

Evolution through natural selection is just that: through natural selection. Natural selection only really happens when the environment challenges the population. We're beyond the point where natural selection occurs, as the high population limits the spread of traits. So, unless if a massive change occurs in the environment (like the ice caps melting further), then there will be need to evolve as humans drop like flies.