BETFAIR I & II: Economic Impact and Protectionism in Interstate Trade and Commerce | AUSSIE LAW

  Рет қаралды 3,480

Aussie Law

Aussie Law

Күн бұрын

Two cases involving the betting exchange scheme of Betfair and a breach of section 92 (the freedom of trade and commerce) have been decided by the High Court of Australia. In this video, we will see the facts, reasoning, and result of the two Betfair cases.
0:00 - Intro
1:07 - Betfair I (2008)
5:53 - Betfair II (2012)
// This video does not provide legal counselling or opinion about cases. This channel was created for educational purposes only. //
SUBSCRIBE: kzbin.info?s...
BECOME A MEMBER: / @aussielaw
*****
PLAYLISTS:
- Australian Case Law - • Australian Case Law
- Constitutional Law - • Constitutional Law
- Constitutional Interpretation - • Constitutional Interpr...
- Constitutional Provisions Explained - • Constitutional Provisi...
*****
RELATED VIDEOS:
- Express “Rights”: Free Trade, Commerce, and Intercourse between States (s 92) - • Express “Rights”: Free...
- Cole v Whitfield: The Two Limbs of Section 92 and the Free Trade Theory - • COLE v WHITFIELD (1988...
- What is a Discriminatory Burden of a Protectionist Kind? - • What is a Discriminato...
- Castlemaine Tooheys v South Australia: Environmental Defence and Free Trade (s 92) - • Castlemaine Tooheys v ...
- Palmer v Western Australia (2021): Border Closures and the Freedom of Intercourse (s 92) - • PALMER v WESTERN AUSTR...
*****
RECOMMENDED READINGS:
- Winterton's Australian Federal Constitutional Law (Gerangerlos, Aroney, Murray, Evans, Emerton, Stone)
*****
LINKS:
- The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act : www.legislation.gov.au/Detail...
- Betfair v Western Australia (2008) : jade.io/article/61096
- Betfair v Racing New South Wales (2012) : jade.io/article/263021
*****
TWITTER: / renatosmcosta
ACADEMIC PROFILES:
law.uq.edu.au/profile/11028/r...
www.uq.academia.edu/RenatoSaeg...
#auslaw #australianconstitution #freetrade

Пікірлер: 4
@AussieLaw
@AussieLaw Жыл бұрын
SUBSCRIBE: kzbin.info BECOME A MEMBER: kzbin.info/door/loahlV-M4A0LIc14rmfNnwjoin 0:00 - Intro 1:07 - Betfair I (2008) 5:53 - Betfair II (2012) // This video does not provide legal counselling or opinion about cases. This channel was created for educational purposes only. //
@oscarmoody2173
@oscarmoody2173 Жыл бұрын
thank you for all the great videos! Im studying constitutional law at the moment and your videos are a great help!
@davidjames1620
@davidjames1620 Жыл бұрын
It's a dual Commonwealth. Courts have mentioned this before in cases. Federation Commonwealth and the monarchy Commonwealth. The founding powers achieved absolute monarchy in Australia when the crown King William the IV accepted a treaty with a tribe in Australia, Queen Victoria approved the application for the royal charter for the treaty. The states under Henry Parkes came together to try get out of the treaty and charter granted, they thought 1900 constituting achieved that. It wasn't until 1969 law review for parliament they realised the crown still owned all the lands under that treaty obligation. The 1986 Australia act was the second attempt to remove the treaty and royal charter, but only achieved a system of fabricated rules and laws. "God save the Queen, but who will save the governor general of Australia'. Why do you think the treaty is listed on the stock market in America, an Australians think it's their country listed, No it's the treaty under that royal charter. Australia laws, Absolute monarchy laws = treaty under royal charter. That tribe was massacred by the federalist to wipe the treaty out and the royal charter, failed, So they made laws to take control over the tribe so they had the power of that charter, failed, So they removed the children, The king is an absolute monarch of Australia by that treaty, The federal parliament continues to makes faster laws to bury the truth, and hide it away from people's eyes. Paul Keaton former prime minister said, a pirating government who stole the lands/ treaty. Everything asked for by that treaty obligations were granted by the home government of England and the monarch. The laws are not primary they are secondary laws of the federal parliament, The monarch has primary laws via that treaty
@curtdrake8088
@curtdrake8088 Жыл бұрын
💞 'Promo SM'
The Operational Inconsistency in the Kakariki Case | AUSSIE LAW
7:17
WHO LAUGHS LAST LAUGHS BEST 😎 #comedy
00:18
HaHaWhat
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
Who has won ?? 😀 #shortvideo #lizzyisaeva
00:24
Lizzy Isaeva
Рет қаралды 64 МЛН
마시멜로우로 체감되는 요즘 물가
00:20
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН
Is FREE TRADE better than PROTECTIONISM? What is FREE TRADE and PROTECTIONISM?
3:24
Modern Monetary Theory Explained - Is MMT Right or Wrong?
21:59
PensionCraft
Рет қаралды 79 М.
WEBINAR: State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: An Introduction to the Final Rule
51:35
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Рет қаралды 10 М.
The Demographic Drought
34:29
Lightcast
Рет қаралды 341 М.
Tariffs and Protectionism
14:51
Marginal Revolution University
Рет қаралды 219 М.