Рет қаралды 3,480
Two cases involving the betting exchange scheme of Betfair and a breach of section 92 (the freedom of trade and commerce) have been decided by the High Court of Australia. In this video, we will see the facts, reasoning, and result of the two Betfair cases.
0:00 - Intro
1:07 - Betfair I (2008)
5:53 - Betfair II (2012)
// This video does not provide legal counselling or opinion about cases. This channel was created for educational purposes only. //
SUBSCRIBE: kzbin.info?s...
BECOME A MEMBER: / @aussielaw
*****
PLAYLISTS:
- Australian Case Law - • Australian Case Law
- Constitutional Law - • Constitutional Law
- Constitutional Interpretation - • Constitutional Interpr...
- Constitutional Provisions Explained - • Constitutional Provisi...
*****
RELATED VIDEOS:
- Express “Rights”: Free Trade, Commerce, and Intercourse between States (s 92) - • Express “Rights”: Free...
- Cole v Whitfield: The Two Limbs of Section 92 and the Free Trade Theory - • COLE v WHITFIELD (1988...
- What is a Discriminatory Burden of a Protectionist Kind? - • What is a Discriminato...
- Castlemaine Tooheys v South Australia: Environmental Defence and Free Trade (s 92) - • Castlemaine Tooheys v ...
- Palmer v Western Australia (2021): Border Closures and the Freedom of Intercourse (s 92) - • PALMER v WESTERN AUSTR...
*****
RECOMMENDED READINGS:
- Winterton's Australian Federal Constitutional Law (Gerangerlos, Aroney, Murray, Evans, Emerton, Stone)
*****
LINKS:
- The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act : www.legislation.gov.au/Detail...
- Betfair v Western Australia (2008) : jade.io/article/61096
- Betfair v Racing New South Wales (2012) : jade.io/article/263021
*****
TWITTER: / renatosmcosta
ACADEMIC PROFILES:
law.uq.edu.au/profile/11028/r...
www.uq.academia.edu/RenatoSaeg...
#auslaw #australianconstitution #freetrade