RLC Circuits (2 of 19), How to Calculate Inductive Reactance

[@mohammadalitorabi5626]

What a great teacher. Really step by step and clear. Thanks for this awesome content.

[@stepbystepscience]

You're very welcome! Glad it was clear.

[@chic0sanchez]

What a fantastic resource for anyone learning electronics/physics. I love how the lessons are in bite sized pieces thereby making studying easier. Equal parts theory and problem solving are great. Showing how to convert between the three different formulas (if you include T=1/f) elevates your video beyond most others and gives the audience the background to really understand what is going on. Kudos to you sir from Canada!

[@stepbystepscience]

Thank you for taking the time to write such a positive comment.

[@Boeing737800MAX]

Engineering Rap 0:10 Thanks for the explanation! Crystal clear and more effective than that in our college lectures.

[@stepbystepscience]

I try to go over everything step by step. You can see a listing of all my videos at my website, www.stepbystepscience.com

[@Boeing737800MAX]

Awesome, will definitely check it out. :)

[@danphillips8530]

Did you do the calc, if so what did u get

[@personalselction]

I love your videos such huge help. You are greatly appreciated!

[@stepbystepscience]

Happy to help! thanks for the comment.

[@wjmccartan6747]

You deserve a lot of credit for all these videos sir. They're great!! Thank you so much man. Did everything you said at the end too. Many thanks from: I R E L A N D :)

[@stepbystepscience]

Thanks for the great comment. You can see a listing of all my vidoes at www.stepbystepscience.com

[@nicovanwyk9201]

Bloody oath, you're a legend!

[@stepbystepscience]

Such a nice compliment, thanks!

[@romanojguy]

Very good. Thanks a lot.

[@gugumasangu967]

Nice videos Sir they are really helpful....thanks to utube now I can watch this wonderful piece of work all the way from South Africa 🇿🇦

[@parentteachernight]

I keep getting 2.7 ohms, not 27ohms. I'm not confident in algebra. am I doing something wrong, or is there an error in the video?

[@stepbystepscience]

Yes you are right the answer is 2.7 Ohms.

[@mohamedbouyghoulodne6159]

@@stepbystepscience yes that correct is 2,7 omhs tanks

[@danphillips8530]

Me too

[@irfanjames125]

God bless you.

[@stepbystepscience]

Thanks! Best wishes to you.

[@xSupernova92x]

Hey i didn't really watch this video but i did watch the Free fall, Projectile motion series due to the exam i have tomorrow. Just wanted to leave my nice positive comment and give you a thumb up. Papa bless.

[@stepbystepscience]

Thanks for the thumbs up and the nice positive comment. Hope the exam went well. You can see alisting of all my videos at www.stepbystepscience.com.

[@iliashishoski1261]

I get 2.7ohms how did you get 27?

[@sridharchitta7321]

Inductive reactance The inductive reactance is expressed in ohms, and is useful to determine steady-state current values to sinusoidal voltage inputs. It is to be noted that though the value of the reactance is expressed in ohms, it was not obtained by computing a resistance, as of resistors. The current in the wires of an inductive circuit is a result of an opposing coulomb electric field, which is set up by surface charge as a result of polarization of the inductor by the non-coulomb curly patterned electric field associated with the changing magnetic field, and the current resulting thereof by applying the relation J = σE(NET) where E(NET) is the resultant field of the applied field and the coulomb electric field, and σ is the conductivity. Electrostatics and circuits belong to one science and not two, that of electricity and magnetism. To know how they are unified visit this link matterandinteractions.org/articles-talks/ and view the article 'A unified treatment of electrostatics and circuits. B. Sherwood and R. Chabay, unpublished. (1999)' pdf. For a detailed discussion of the physics of inductors, curly patterned non-coulomb electric field, coulomb field and currents in a inductive circuit at different sinusoidally varying voltages see "Electric and Magnetic Interactions" by Chabay and Sherwood www.matterandinteractions.org or Fundamentals of electric theory and circuits by Sridhar Chitta www.wileyindia.com/fundamentals-of-electric-theory-and-circuits.html For a lecture by Prof Ruth Chabay on surface charge in a simple dc circuit visit kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y2i6Y2xqg8R7oc0

[@cbabrunal]

Thanks for the Videos. Your laptop fans, I can hear them in the recording clearly. Make sure the laptop is not overheating.

[@stepbystepscience]

I got a new laptop so it should be better now. You can also see a listing of all my videos by topic at www.stepbystepscience.com

[@Paradoxicon999]

Aside from the error (those #@!# decimal places!) The video was well laid out.

[@stepbystepscience]

Thanks will look into the decimal errors.

[@jlee1706]

Thanks

[@stepbystepscience]

You're welcome

[@maksior911]

Thank You again :) ..........btw are you Tom Hanks?

[@stepbystepscience]

I am his better looking older brother John.

[@NyGunGarage]

Lol that 27 had me sitting here for half an hour just to verify. Kept thinking I'm doing something wrong

[@chadleydaniels6324]

you weren't the only one🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@eljefe6852]

How to calculate the inductor reactance if given is the inductor and 10rad/s?

[@beginsaingenieriaelectrica9701]

hy every one, i need to know where the 10-6 come from

[@stepbystepscience]

L = 43 uH, the u in uH is for micro (it is actually the Greek letter mu), so then it is microHenries. So 43 x 10-6 H = 43 uH. Does that help?

[@beginsaingenieriaelectrica9701]

@@stepbystepscience great now i start to get it soo u mean 6 digit 0.000001 like this

[@hansepie]

Beginsa Ingeniería eléctrica 10 6 (six higher than 10) means 10 to the power of 6 which means 10*10*10*10*10*10 = 1,000,000. Minus in the exponential means the reciprocal of that so 1/1,000,000 = 0.000001

[@omarcibrian8597]

I'm getting 2.7 ohm's also

[@danphillips8530]

Yea, I got 2.7 both times

[@realtoy1]

I just did the calculations and also came up with 2.7 ohms both times.

[@eliasliee2322]

he used 100kHZ

[@ramesh280475]

Yes you are right if he used 10 khz then ans. Is 2.7004 , I was breaking my head wondering where i went wrong!!!

[@danphillips8530]

Im2 getting 2.7 H any one else, or can sum one explain, cheers

[@MrFatperson]

This guy sounds a bit like optic hecz haha