According to the "Bill Of Rights" We, as Americans, have those rights in all 50 states.
@peacefulwarrior40782 ай бұрын
2A APPLIES TO EVERY SINGLE STATE IN OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC! There are no EXCEPTIONS TO THAT CONSTITUTIONAL RULE OF LAW
@vld78502 ай бұрын
FACT!
@Harleyblake-eb1pj2 ай бұрын
Also remember that this is a codeified law in the CIVIL RIGHTS section of an INALIENABLE RIGHT to have the tools to defend yourself that PREDATES even the Constitution. It is not just a law, it is a civil right which the codeification makes it unlawful to infringe upon.
@TheHarleywolf2 ай бұрын
Nothing in the Constitution gives the states or the federal government any right to control firearms.
@gunztommiegunz2 ай бұрын
I love my country. Cannot stress how much I hate this government particularly the current administration.
@goodcitizen642 ай бұрын
I agree 💯👍 fellow patriot
@mikespencer94092 ай бұрын
I never dreamed that I could ever HATE something as much as I HATE what this government has become And that HATE goes for what they are doing with the 2nd amendment and everything else they are doing to AMERICA 🇺🇸
@user-pr3ho5pz4m2 ай бұрын
Shall not be infringed.....period.
@conservativesniperhunter74392 ай бұрын
The United States Constitution is the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND PERIOD!
@MichaelSlattery-sh8vl2 ай бұрын
Darned Right!
@AnAmericanPatriot15552 ай бұрын
I guess we have a lot of people in office that didn’t take or flunked out of Civics 101.
@vld78502 ай бұрын
AMEN!
@marcleblanc62932 ай бұрын
Apherhently not according to some politicions and state legislators.....civil war is coming....never let the government dictate your rights.
@OldSchoolDad2 ай бұрын
I don't need 50 drivers licenses to drive across the country. Why should I need a permit from each state? Really, why should I need a permit at all?
@stevenkempton74692 ай бұрын
The 2nd amendment is mine.
@walterhaumaier91372 ай бұрын
Considering driving is considered a privilege not a god given right it really is ridiculous we need a license for firearms period
@stevenkempton74692 ай бұрын
@@walterhaumaier9137 actually, you should learn what the Supreme Court has said on cars and operating them. At least one case law is as recent as 2013. It is an uphill battle to get everyone reeducated on what their rights actually are, but traveling in a private automobile on the highways and roads, is a fundamental right under the constitution. So what it’s considered is irrelevant. What it is, is relevant.
@walterhaumaier91372 ай бұрын
@@stevenkempton7469 thank you for the information do you have any sources I can read to update myself please and thank you
@stevenkempton74692 ай бұрын
@@walterhaumaier9137 it’s called google.
@firebpm49772 ай бұрын
I am a prisoner of Massachusetts, and I hope we get our asses kicked in court.
@NorincoKid802 ай бұрын
Same
@brentsnow25712 ай бұрын
sign that petition also
@rogerstoney22032 ай бұрын
It is time to start defunding any state that violates the constitution. No more taxpayer funding to any state that refuses to uphold the constitution of this country.
@1CoupedeTat2 ай бұрын
that's how they got states to fall in line with the imposition of 55mph speed limit, smog testing et al
@johnrebman57182 ай бұрын
@1CoupedeTat speed limits and smog testing are not Constitutional rights.
@scottgagliardi59332 ай бұрын
Problem is the administration is all about it
@1CoupedeTat2 ай бұрын
@@johnrebman5718 indeed they are not
@vld78502 ай бұрын
AMEN, ABSOLUTELY!
@EngineMedic72 ай бұрын
supremacy clause, 2A rules supreme
@crazysquirrel94252 ай бұрын
Why isn't Scotus ruling that way???
@ShiroColdkeyesTheHedgehog2 ай бұрын
So if our drivers license is recognized in all 50 states, why shouldnt you be allowed to defend yourself regardless?
@mikeabney12142 ай бұрын
SCOTUS needs to implement national reciprocity.
@ij27502 ай бұрын
No Congress needs to implement reciprocity SCOTUS will simply be ignored.
@ericsfishingadventures44332 ай бұрын
Since when have the lefties listened to scotus lately?
@Asertix3572 ай бұрын
@@ij2750 No, congress will be ignored too. The states have demonstrated that they'll ignore federal law whenever they don't like it, and won't face any repercussions for it.
@mikeabney12142 ай бұрын
@Asertix357 Sorry, I mis-spoke. I should have said that SCOTUS needs to rule that an out of state individual can carry anywhere as long as they are legally able to do so in their home state, thus forcing national reciprocity. Until we vote out enough of these gun grabbers, congress will never pass a national reciprocity law.
@ij27502 ай бұрын
@@Asertix357 I want argue the point but I feel it will be harder for the states to ignore congress than SCOTUS.
@tloller522 ай бұрын
No state should be allowed to make any gun laws at all.
@Firedrake13132 ай бұрын
And neither can the federal government, unless they change the constitution.
@EdwardSatterfield2 ай бұрын
The 2nd applys to the whole country period!!!!
@danfry16692 ай бұрын
IF this case is won, it should remove all reprocesity laws in all states.
@chrisclark52042 ай бұрын
Also the laws should be the same for residents and non residents. In most states the laws differ for non residents.
@mikefarmer47482 ай бұрын
Not just a violation of the 2nd Amendment, also a violation of Article VI.
@jamm14222 ай бұрын
My gun rights are to not be infringed across state lines. It is a federal right. I am tired of Massachusetts infringing upon my rights.
@rumblebudgie20852 ай бұрын
My rights aren't up for debate.
@jdhdale2 ай бұрын
Dear NH. Just pass a law requiring out of state persons posses a handgun with a minimum standard 15 rd mag on their person, or it’s a felony. Self defense is not a laughing matter and firearms are a national right. All free persons have all rights.
@finngamesknudson14572 ай бұрын
You would need specified exceptions. For example prohibited or under aged individuals should be exempted. Others should have option of posting a bond (partially refundable) to receive a permit to not carry. In any case anyone coming from a prohibition state should be allowed some minimal time and distance to get strapped so that it is possible to be law abiding.
@rockpauly32002 ай бұрын
Free persons that would be what they call an oxymoron I believe you probably think of Sovereign citizen is a thing too why don't you have a bust out a legal dictionary and read what the definition of those words are cuz nobody seems to know what words mean anymore
@crazysquirrel94252 ай бұрын
@@finngamesknudson1457 Exceptions = INFRINGEMENTS. There is no word except in the 2A. Old enough to do an adult crime then old enough to do the adult TIME. Or death sentence. If someone is proven in court to be so bad TO THE PUBLIC ONLY and not just their spouse, why aren't they kept locked up until they ARE no longer bad?
@finngamesknudson14572 ай бұрын
@@crazysquirrel9425 - Proposal was for state law requiring that everyone carry a firearm. State law requiring someone to break federal law will be challenged and will lose in court. I was proposing a change to @jdhdale’s suggestion to make it LESS intrusive.
@crazysquirrel94252 ай бұрын
@@finngamesknudson1457 Ahh sorry I misunderstood your post. They can still pass a law but say legal gun owners with legal firearms.... But I think there is a religious exemption in the constitution. Can't remember...
@DaddyRecon12 ай бұрын
It is absolutely absurd that we continue to have these cases to which they are never resolved. They keep kicking the can down the road and I’m not sure SCOTUS can drive a nail in the coffin.
@TheZombieburner2 ай бұрын
It's not that they can't, it's that they don't want to.
@vld78502 ай бұрын
@@TheZombieburner AGREE!
@DaddyRecon12 ай бұрын
@@TheZombieburner agreed, such BS….
@Noneyourbusiness-d8ball2 ай бұрын
SCOTUS = oligarch society members.
@kennithminnich2 ай бұрын
We really need national reciprocity, not a patchwork of laws.
@crazysquirrel94252 ай бұрын
Constitutional carry actually, for everyone, regardless of their past or age.
@matterofrights23442 ай бұрын
Reciprocity is not a prize; it is an infringement.
@Joseph-u3t2n2 ай бұрын
I remember Trump saying earlier this year saying when he gets back in office he will make it constitutional carry in every state
@daveadock28742 ай бұрын
Just as long as he adds in there shall be no sensitive places either.
@ryanguldbrandsen76722 ай бұрын
I don't think he can actually do that. He can't really step on states laws. But, he can get some new younger conservative supreme court judges on the bench. That would help us a shit ton.
@crazysquirrel94252 ай бұрын
@@daveadock2874 Only two sensitive places I can think of - ammunition storage/factories. and hazardous chemical factories. And perhaps inside of a prison or jail. Any place the public (or you) can go, so should your GUNS.
@timsmith11252 ай бұрын
NH native and resident here. The state motto “LiveFree or Die” has been maligned by many. Yet, as a Constitutional Carry state, we have one of the lowest per capita crime rates in the nation as well as being ranked as one of the safest. As for the retired judge’s comment about people’s behavior, my choice is to avoid MA and other places that think that it’s ok to infringe upon my rights as a law abiding citizen.
@MrMysteriousDm2 ай бұрын
If I can afford it I should be able to own it. Imaginary lines and unconstitutional bullshit be damned
@skydivingcomrade16482 ай бұрын
Neither states, federal government, courts, executive branch, or LEGISLATURE have the just powers to violate rights.
@jasonmatkovich63422 ай бұрын
I mean this is why you need to pay attention to reciprocity between states when you get your permit. But hopefully this goes to the SCOTUS and it gets tossed and gets us nationwide carry
@ryanguldbrandsen76722 ай бұрын
As a resident of the free state of New Hampshire. Im proud of my state.
@SargeUSMC2 ай бұрын
This is exactly why I keep asking the various national 2A groups to go after the “big fish” (try to get something to SCOTUS where they have to define “Shall Not Be Infringed”) instead of going after “minnows” like rifle and magazine bans. While those bans are terrible and definitely unconstitutional, the rulings on those types of cases tend to be very narrow and they leave a lot of room for shenanigans by the lower courts (see Bruen). We need something so broad and so powerful that it kicks every infringing law off the books in one fell swoop.
@barbaraordonia51352 ай бұрын
Why can’t these people sue these states for taking their 2nd amendments away.
@Asertix3572 ай бұрын
Money. The states have billions of dollars in taxpayer money to foot the legal fees, and no hesitation in using it for just such a purpose. It's a battle of attrition, and nobody has the funding to go against them in hopes of bleeding the states dry.
@michaelperine27802 ай бұрын
Anyone can, and many are.
@EngineMedic72 ай бұрын
how do you think we got bruen?
@tomhalla4262 ай бұрын
Absolute immunity, a Warren Court creation giving officials exemption from the KKK Act.
@markcastonguay79062 ай бұрын
Currupt courts that almost always side with the criminals
@dondidykes20812 ай бұрын
Yes it does violate peoples rights
@keithbarron36542 ай бұрын
Well in 1868 Massachusetts ratified the 14th amendment, the constitution and Bill of rights do apply to States, as they did when they joined the Union at inception of statehood.
@EngineMedic72 ай бұрын
don't tell them that....libs don't like facts
@RichKosack2 ай бұрын
Excellent test of the constitution.!
@jdmitchell30772 ай бұрын
The 10 the amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." But obviously, the 2nd amendment takes firearms laws away from the states. I think it's pretty clear, states have NO authority to make any firearms laws, going strictly by the constitution. As any state "arms" law is a direct "infringement."
@Firedrake13132 ай бұрын
The federal government has no authority either, unless they change the constitution first.
@crazysquirrel94252 ай бұрын
9th amendment can apply also.
@Thor457012 ай бұрын
The answer to this is obvious. Massachusetts is wrong. The same holds true to Illinois and all of its surrounding states .
@MultiSweener2 ай бұрын
You should try Maryland.
@ShaeferGriffin-it9nx2 ай бұрын
Yep. I'm right across the river in St. Louis. Missouri is the diametric opposite of Illinois when it comes to 2A. Good thing I don't cross the river for any reason.
@JohnGriffith-w2w2 ай бұрын
Massachusetts also needs to create business for their injustice system by criminalizing the Rights of the People!
@lewisholmes57452 ай бұрын
My Constitutionally protected rights do NOT stop at some imaginary line on a map. The Constitution and Bill of Rights IS the law of this Constitutional Republic, PERIOD!!!
@crazysquirrel94252 ай бұрын
And that is EXACTLY why the Democrats say we are a DEMOCRACY.... In a Democracy, 50%+1 can vote away anything from the other 49%-1 Obama's plan was to destroy our republic and install a full blown Democracy (aka fundamentally change the country).
@chrisbousson75402 ай бұрын
This is like Illinois. I live in Iowa and can't go across the river and carry there cause they dont have repository to us. We are have Constitutional carry in Iowa.
@Killerviz802 ай бұрын
If the government, or businesses can’t 100% guarantee your safety, then you should be allowed to carry a weapon. Across all states.
@ScottB-xz8zj2 ай бұрын
Fight! Fight! Fight! Vote RED!
@jalan022 ай бұрын
This is, basically, one state suing another. That, by definition, puts this in the Federal Court. So, what, exactly, does the MA Supreme Court have to do with it?
@bemame01192 ай бұрын
That’s why New Hampshire has “live free or die” on their license plates.
@davidleblanc52712 ай бұрын
And the sad part is Massachusetts was the colony that started the Revolutionary War towards Freedom from Tyrrany and today we are one of the most tyrannical states in the union
@micwell22472 ай бұрын
Maybe their gov needs to be arrested ...under infringement and it's not a narrative
@davidleblanc52712 ай бұрын
Boy would I LOVE to see New Hampshire give Massachusetts a swift kick in the balls concerning this case and if it does go to the Supreme Court I hope they tell Massachusetts to stick it where the sun doesn't shine 😅
@ShiroColdkeyesTheHedgehog2 ай бұрын
If you cant carry your gun in all 50 states, why is your license to drive recognized?
@jbarres802 ай бұрын
What blows my mind is I had NYS CCW and than moved outta NY 2 yrs ago and now I can longer carry in NY
@jbarres802 ай бұрын
We all know this is trash and needs to change asap. If I’m a responsible person carrying in say Texas and I wanna take a trip to east coast I shouldn’t have to worry about going to prison for exercising a right. And Ma allows non resident permits only states on East coast that don’t are NY NJ
@fishgutz42722 ай бұрын
Recall this happened in a Nashua Mall where part of the mall crossed in MA. There is no line in the mall making the state line. It is not possible for anyone legally carrying in NH to know where that line is. The parking lot is not marked either.
@louisbabycos1062 ай бұрын
Boycott the mall
@philhardwick1002 ай бұрын
Tha Mass AG’s statement is absolutely false. It IS unconstitutional to infringe on people’s rights no matter what state you’re in.
@Leslie-es5ij2 ай бұрын
So how do the states get away with infringements then ? Why don't we have no permit national carry rights then ?
@gragnask12 ай бұрын
The NH constitution also gives us the rightof rebellion against the state.
@michaelperine27802 ай бұрын
Federal district court in California held that California must provide a system to issue concealed carry permits to nonresidents. CRPA, Inc. v. L.A. County Sheriffs. Also, a case was filed in April, same issue. Hoffman v. Bonta.
@JamesPatterson-q8n2 ай бұрын
If you drive from Peham NH to Salem NH on Old Gage Hill rd/Hampshire rd, you cross through a 2 mile section in Massachusetts that the police will wait for NH drivers to go through. Not fun to have to go around.
@johnrebman57182 ай бұрын
You need to sue the Massachusetts police officers personally for ' under color of law violating your civil rights. When they have to start going to court and paying out of their own pocket, they WILL STOP.
@geekchameleon2 ай бұрын
When someone goes from one state to another, that person is engaged in interstate commerce. Doesn't Congress have the authority and obligation to regulate interstate commerce?
@rlb962 ай бұрын
Commerce is selling a product or providing a service. Just because I cross a state line doesn't automatically mean I'm engaging in commerce.
@apd092 ай бұрын
MA residents go to NH more to get flavored tobacco than fireworks. MA banned all flavors of tobacco, so no mint dip, menthol cigarettes, etc... and NH is happy to have stores right over the border along every road to sell to them and collect the sales tax.
@Harleyblake-eb1pj2 ай бұрын
keep em comin sir. Good info and good segment choice. This is why I monitor your channel. Thanks
@stantonroyce93772 ай бұрын
Like California gives big fine tickets to out of state drivers of cars that live where they only need one license plate whereas California demands two.
@charlespaine9872 ай бұрын
HERE WE GO AGAIN! A similar battle occurred between CONNECTICUT AND NEW HAMPSHIRE over liquor taxes . A CT State trouper parked near a NH liquor store to catch CT RESIDENTS purchasing cheaper in NH. NH STATE TROUPER ARRESTED CT TROUPER big kerfuffle was raised over that.
@MrDDarrah2 ай бұрын
No, any law in the slightest conflict with the constitution is null and void and we shall not comply
@VikingRacer2 ай бұрын
How does any state have a right to implement any gun law when all of them contradict the Constitution which is federal law
@edb45262 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@rondrew28572 ай бұрын
From NH, its about time......
@earlyblackmz2 ай бұрын
Fellow Mass folks, please get out there and sign the anti h4885 petition! 🇺🇸💪🏻🙏🏻🗽🦅🇺🇸
@MarkBernat2 ай бұрын
Living in nh and going 1 mile into mass daily,,it’s just like existing in two different dimensions.
@davem41932 ай бұрын
It's like entering the Soviet Union when you go into Mass.
@bobross85692 ай бұрын
The great boogaloo is coming it's not a question of if it's a question of when.
@tomrosa2162 ай бұрын
Massachusetts gun laws and Governor suck!
@patrickmchargue71222 ай бұрын
Reciprocity would be nice.
@joemcmurray91382 ай бұрын
Those clowns need to realize that the Constitution is the law of the land in this country. NOT STATE LAWS
@goodcitizen642 ай бұрын
Thanks 👍
@shawnlopez62502 ай бұрын
As a resident of New hampshire I try to stay out of Mass and don't carry there , but it should be our right to carry legally in the United States. That is the problem we are not united at all, the constitution applies to every and every state..Thats why I moved out of CT..
@jasons14032 ай бұрын
I live in mass and I'm rooting for NH!
@CarportCarl2 ай бұрын
Massachusett-stan 😐
@11B30Inf2 ай бұрын
Massachusetts should change their state name to New Britain and their state flag should be the British Commonwealth Tory Flag.
@nathanmeyer24702 ай бұрын
3 wire!! Let's go Reciprocity!!!
@toddfoxman45502 ай бұрын
Did not Massachusetts legislature say of oncoming lawsuits against the passing of sweeping guns laws, "BRING IT ON" ? Looks like they got it much sooner than expected. Hope this trickles down to their communist neighbors Rhode Island. Just as bad here, too. The reason why I'm planning to head south for the rest of my life.
@jdhdale2 ай бұрын
Nothing prohibits NH from making Baring arms for personal defense a requirement.
@geraldervin63422 ай бұрын
New Hampshire has one of the lowest crime rates in the nation and they are the number one spot when it comes to lax gun laws M❤assachusetts has one of the most resticted gun laws and one of the highest crime rates! This should tell you somethig about gun crime and the necessity of the 2 nd amendment!
@thomass20552 ай бұрын
Constitutional Laws are the rights of the people and shall not be silenced unless it is Communism.
@markjordan3482 ай бұрын
This was already covered under the Dred Scott decision. A person cannot be deprived of their property that is legally owned in their home state because they travel to a state where it is illegal. One of the judges dissenting on the section where Dred Scott was ruled to be property said this part was good law in bad circumstances. To my knowledge it has never been overturned.
@Loretta-c8j2 ай бұрын
How much of this insanity do we have to put up with. Supreme court really needs to shut this down for good.
@scottgagliardi59332 ай бұрын
Federal law says you can transport through state lines as long as you're passing through the state and not staying
@kevingary70182 ай бұрын
I mean what part of shall not be infringed are we talking about? Our second amendment is written in plain English, and should be protected in all 50 states.
@GummeeH32 ай бұрын
do any of the other Bill of Rights rights stop at state lines?
@Bull15352 ай бұрын
We have the same bs here between Virginia and MD
@frederickguerra99992 ай бұрын
We need to hold ALL STATES that violate our rights (especially 2A) accountable - with huge fines, court costs, and punitive damages
@darrenlynch67482 ай бұрын
I'm glad this is happening. There is a chance that the SCOTUS may guarantee all state's reciprocity.
@bilbsk.25102 ай бұрын
Thanks
@Mrs.Patriot2 ай бұрын
Article 3, Sec 2, para 2: "In all cases ... in which a state shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction."
@jeffbroders97812 ай бұрын
Constitutional carry is the only way to resolve these issues between the states. There's a reason why it's called Constitutional carry because they are following the constitution.
@bobmorgan15752 ай бұрын
When state laws are declared unconstitutional then they cannot be enforce. The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land, superseding even Federal laws and regulations not related to the US military.
@dbelex2 ай бұрын
I live in NH. I could make more money working in Massachusetts, but won't because of that.....And their tax bullshit.
@stantonroyce93772 ай бұрын
9th District fed appeals Court supports spirit of aloha Hawaii banning guns. Just issued split decision WITHIN ONE APPEALS COURT re ok sensitive places between Hawaii vs California.
@johnrebman57182 ай бұрын
And the 9th circus is going to get their butts spanked for that decision.
@stantonroyce93772 ай бұрын
And what I mean by split decision, usually if two different fed districts have differing decisions on the same issue, Supreme Court gets involved. 9th issued a decision where itself gave two different decisions on what are okay sensitive places, Hawaii versus California. Judicial schizophrenia.
@crazydave0692 ай бұрын
Look at the Pheasant Lane Mall. It is in NH, but one of the entrance/exits is into Massachusetts.
@crazydave0692 ай бұрын
You can't leave that NH mall through that exit without going into Massachusetts.
@marcleblanc62932 ай бұрын
Maybe when Trump is elected he will put an end to all this crap.
@darkside592 ай бұрын
I hope they go after Cali as well. I have my AZ CCW and have friends and family in Cali. Before I cross over the border, I have to disarm and be a sitting duck while traveling into Cali. I used to have a Cali CCW, but it was void right after I moved to AZ. I have a lot of friends and family asking when I'll be visiting them. I told them it won't be a very long time I'll be visiting Cali.
@roddecker19002 ай бұрын
Interesting but not new turn around. Good timing . Wonder att that somtimes.
@johncunningham90162 ай бұрын
Don't call it Massachusetts. It is now ASSACHUSETTS.
@gentrydebbie10402 ай бұрын
2A is a Constitutional Right .The End.
@MrJeronlewis2 ай бұрын
Scotus definitely needs to address reciprocity or permitting all together.
@allanhitchmoth30992 ай бұрын
There's actually a mall in Southern New Hampshire which has a section of a parking lot that requires a driver to travel a few yards across the border into Mass. There have been several instances in which Mass police have noticed a legal carrier IN the mall, and pinched them as they left the parking lot! ...there's a reason we call 'em "Mass-Holes!"