Who will run out of fresh troops first, Ukraine or Russia?

[@Binkov]

Compare news coverage from diverse sources around the world. Try Ground News today and get 50% off your subscription. It's their biggest sale of the year: ground.news/binkov

[@silverjohn6037]

As a possible follow up to this video perhaps the question of how many experienced troops are being retained in service as, without experienced officers and ncos to train and lead them, large numbers of raw recruits would be a lot less effective.

[@Christs_Apologet]

I mean it's literally a country with tens of millions against a country with around 150 million. Wonder who would run out first lol.

[@secretreagent1728]

Absolutely sad, what a meat grinder.

[@Honorablebenaiaha]

@@Binkov lower draft age, problem solved

[@Honorablebenaiaha]

@Christs_Apologet but NATO has plenty of

[@BalthasarGelt-x2d]

Funny how both sides are claiming this is enemy propaganda.

[@tomtech1537]

It is funny when you speak to people from a given echo chamber arguing that the numbers are way off and x side is done already and just waiting for the collapse. I remember sitting with an acquittance in Nov 2022 insisting UA is done in a month who then doubled down in Apr 2023 saying that they are completely out of equipment and they are just throwing bodies at Russia. Obviously endless videos on YT saying Russia is done given the primarily western audience. The mainstream loss estimates (which he has drawn from) have enormous error bars which is the valid criticism that they find but then produce literal propaganda numbers as their source of truth and anything else must be propaganda. The irony is delicious.

[@gups4963]

And they both are, just the way it is

[@derpiru28]

Because both sides are heavily biased, they want to hear what they want not what they need.

[@galactic-guy]

That means he's doing something right though. If both sides are complaining, that means this video must be more or less neutral.

[@LanternOfLiberty]

People are commenting that Binkov is a pro-russian fanboy AND that he's on the side of Ukraine. I guess that means he is independent and balanced?👍

[@bearsausage8599]

He's been called both for no reason. Admitting that Russia or Ukraine has an advantage in one area, simply makes you, smart I guess. Especially in comparison to the bot naysayers.

[@guidomista5738]

pissing off or glazing both sides doesn't make you unbiased lol

[@LanternOfLiberty]

@@guidomista5738 I'm just going to let you rethink that statement. Give it a couple of years.

[@guidomista5738]

​@@LanternOfLiberty if you neither like taste of dirt or for example mint chocolate it doesn't mean you have completely unbiased taste. You wouldn't need couple of years to choose what to eat so. What unbias position are we talking about here if it's literally in the name Binkov- most of russian names have "-ov" or "-off" ending.

[@gups4963]

@@guidomista5738 Typically if both sides are upset with you, you are hitting the middle ground. Something that is needed

[@CYbeRuKRaINiaN]

Everyone's talking how each side will collapse soon, but you can't really predict that. Everything looks stable until it doesn't, it can happen to both sides because of either some random event or a complicated string of events happening to the society and the economy which cannot be entirely analysed (because of lack of available information etc.) that will make you think at first it's random. And hoping something will happen doesn't mean it will happen.

[@dragonrykr]

Exactly. I mean just look at Syria. If you go back just a month ago and if you were to tell people what would happen, few would believe you. It was almost accepted that Assad won the war in 2020, and then everything went upside down, within 12 days. When you think you've figured it all out, this timeline just makes an unexpected turn that shuffles the entire board

[@LeeroyGgJenkins]

Ahh yes the famous bot comment section

[@orionbukantis6470]

When zealots from both sides are accusing you of propaganda, you know you have made a balanced video. Well done.

[@brandonsarsland-brunner3390]

This is the most normal comment I have seen on here

[@rubenskiii]

The fact that Russia rather makes deals with countries like North Korea than mobilize more soldiers says something about how much people Putin can send to the trenches. Also keep in mind that Russia cooks the books when it comes to losses a lot, by for example having complete units of DPR and LPR consist of Russians from Russia but then the losses are counted as LPR or DPR losses, not Russian ones. Not wearing any pink glasses about Ukraine but people really underestimate how hard it is to invade a country that wants nothing to do with you. Most Russians don’t give a f about the war as long as they are left alone. That’s not a great recipe for winning a war. Look at Afghanistan for example…

[@eddiethatch5060]

Very true

[@Ese_osa]

Zelenskyy said your mom is a whore 😂😂😂 I want you to also believe 😂😂

[@zebare726]

The problem is if Putin takes too many Russian men to fight on the frontline, the country will revolt when too many lose their relatives to the war. Hence why putin relays on North Korea soldiers.

[@Mr.Heller]

"The fact" with zero factual proof is not a fact.

[@ChingachMookTheGreatPauk]

​@@Mr.Hellerif these simple facts need to be explained, there's no point explaining them to you

[@avannoni685]

Hey man, I just want to say the comments on your channel since the war started have been increasingly negative. It's probably bots organizations that want to infulence the public. The large majority of your viewers think your content is great! Keep up the good work!

[@Christs_Apologet]

Amazing that you speak for everyone and anyone that doesn't seem to align with your opinion is automatically labeled as a bot.

[@usun_politics1033]

Have you considered that it is a backlash to blatant one sided propaganda which is not helpful for the cause?

[@valorz6064]

It is great content. I learned more from Binkov than CNN and Sky News could ever teach. I wonder why they would call Binkov's videos propaganda? Is Binkov not painting a certain side with glowing praise? Is that why? Hmm...

[@valorz6064]

@@usun_politics1033 How is this "one-sided propaganda"? Ahh I see you thought this channel was The Sun and The Daily Mail? I understand why you all appeared in the comments screaming bots. I understand now lmaoo

[@Naccsanyi]

@@avannoni685 Binkov, turn off the comments, the people have opinions! /s

[@bobtheballer2485]

if only bots could pick up guns...

[@urskrik6353]

They can it's called a drone.

[@ingenparks]

Wild to me that Ukraine only drafts at 25. USA threw 18 year olds into Vietnam.

[@miguelb.655]

They have plans to lower it to 20. Also most Ukrainians soldiers wont return home alive or unmaimed after going to hot zones like Donbas.

[@cakecwkecake7479]

we have an absurdly large population, we have al almost 3:1 population advantage with Russia, which has a 4.9:1 population advantage with Ukraine. we could afford to draft kids and send them to war, and because of it we have an entire subset of our culture that is extremely anti-war. some of the greatest musical hits of all time here are anti-war vietnam songs, and we didn't even lose 100,000. different realities. its grim, but it's better for society if young men are able to get work and contribute to the economy, and older men who are closer to retirement and are less productive are sent to the frontline to garrison trenches. i'm sure in the next few years we'll see more mass mobilization in Ukraine, though.

[@user-kq7fh2jy3j]

It's because of the demographic distribution. Very few were born in Ukraine in the 90s and early 2000s. Very many of these have also fled the country, as they had the opportunity to do so earlier. Some joined voluntarily early on, and are now dead or disabled. Some are being taken against their will even now, even though they are supposed to be safe. Most likely, if they did lower it to 18, it would not yield all that many more men per month than they are getting currently. It wouldn't change anything on the battlefield, but it would conclusively demonstrate that Ukraine is just about done. In essence, why play your final card if it is not any good? Better to keep it in your hand and try to bluff.

[@murder.simulator]

Let's just count the number of scooters left in Ukraine vs the number of generals left in Russia

[@ArminiusGroß]

Nice!

[@andreasl_fr2666]

Reddit has 95 million daily users , Ukraine will be fine.

[@ArminiusGroß]

I'm sure you still think this shtick is clever the 9000th time

[@High56278]

it's kinda funny ngl ​@@ArminiusGroß

[@valorz6064]

@@ArminiusGroß It is! Is Reddit where you were from? Land of the blue hairs?

[@valorz6064]

Reddit 69th Mobile Scooter Division "Kamala's Krusaders" is ready to serve the interests of Blackrock and the AIPAC🤫

[@ArminiusGroß]

@valorz6064 you from the land of electric scooters then?

[@andrewcarlson2178]

Ukraine: we've only lost 350k men in 3 years and killed twice as many Russians Also Ukraine: we need to conscript 200k, but maybe 500k to replenish losses. I know, I know....math is hard

[@VonVladimierVoltar]

Actually it is rather simple. Ukraine lost 350k men. If the war ends in the next months thanks to Trump, They only need to recruit 200k men to replace the losses as they don’t need as many to finish. If however the war continues another 2 years, they will need to recruit 500k to replace the 350k already lost and 150k they will likely loss in the next 2 years.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

@@VonVladimierVoltarThere’s also the added issue of troops simply being worn out. There’s only so much fighting a human can handle in a lifetime before losing combat effectiveness.

[@madisondines7441]

Troops still in the service need rotation. They have to entrain those skills into NCOs and COs to train the next generation of soldiers.

[@DoctorDestyNova]

@@RichelieuUnlimitedIt will get better if cyborg tech takes off. Imagine if the science fiction “Socket Soldiers” became reality? Soldiers with only their heads being biological and their bodies having a remote control self-destruct in them, destroying potential captures and preventing desertion? Such is an amazing prospect!

[@martinpeyton2291]

That’s all well and good regarding numbers, but what about motivation? Morale? Clarity of purpose? The US killed a lot more VC and could’ve sustained more losses, but the US lost the war plain and simple.

[@MrChickennugget360]

those kinds of things are much more important in democratically election nations. Russia only has to worry about economy and manpower levels since they don't allow anti-war sentiment. Russia has already lost double the losses the US took over 10 years- (and possibly more)

[@Komainu959]

Regardless of which side you want to win there are at least 250K Humans that have died because of this fighting. Closing in on a million that are injured. It's just heart breaking to me. No matter what side they are on their families will mourn their loss, their friends will mourn their loss. Society in general will have lost how many great people who never got a chance. I pray that a peace deal can be negotiated between them.

[@GeneralBlackNorway]

Putin is to blame for this.

[@davidwiley8752]

A Peace deal like Minsk 1 or 2? Which were only necessary because Russia broke all the treaties they had with Ukraine in 2014? Russia peace treaties are worth less than toilet paper. Especially with Russian shortages of TP!. The only real peace will come from Ukraine's victory.

[@samuilpetkov497]

So many bots

[@ArminiusGroß]

Always, the enemy has an eye that never sleeps

[@Honorablebenaiaha]

@@samuilpetkov497 bots calling out bots, what a time to be alive

[@valorz6064]

I fkning LOVE this channel. Im the only real person here im sure.

[@cz1589]

If both Russian and Ukrainian fans discredit your video's - youre probably doing well

[@valorz6064]

Noticing the only ones screaming "BOTS! Propaganda!" are the ones that wanted Kamala to win lmaoo

[@pliniojr95]

@@valorz6064 So, the Ukraine supporters?

[@drunkendwarf440]

The payment bonus starts from 800k up to 2.5mil rubles depending on region, not 400k.

[@GSXK4]

Russia will simply mobilize without announcing it, then deny it.

[@davidshapiro292]

it was real in your mind

[@ericlane3256]

"Russia is dictating its own casualties" is a huge emphasis that people need to internalize. Casualties do not matter to the Russians nearly as much as it does to the Ukrainians and the Russians are currently fighting the war on their terms. Griding down their enemy to see who folds first and with a 4.9-1 manpower advantage, it will almost certainly be Ukraine unfortunately.

[@lolasdm6959]

Why is Ukraine honest?

[@ShadowPhoenixMaximus]

Its gotten worse in recent months now that Putin is rushing to annex as much land as possible before Trump arrives in office. Putin's Russia is sub-human garbage by international standards of basic human decency.

[@Stephen-bq4nq]

I have supported Ukraine since the beginning but the reality is they don't have the population base to win a battle of attrition against Russia. They will need to give up the conventional fight at some point and fight an insurgency which will reduce casualties and demands on manpower.

[@Astraben]

Russia is desperate for headlines and willing to throw away thousands of men a day to be able to say they advanced 10 meters along the entire front. Its only hope and strategy is minimizing Western equipment shipments, and it´s going to do whatever it takes to secure breathing room before their economy collapses in the next few months.

[@maje5842]

@@Stephen-bq4nqFight an insurgency with what? Ukraine barely has any people to fight a conventional war. What makes you think they’ll have people to fight a guerrilla war? Ukraine ain’t Afghanistan. Its population isn’t predominantly young which is crucial at waging a guerrilla war, nor are the Russians like the Americans who held back and tried to gain the hearts and minds of the people. My guess is that the vast majority of people who will fall under Russian control are either pro-Russia or they will simply tolerate Russian rule and keep their heads down.

[@lp5335]

Ukraine is committed to protecting the younger generation so they can rebuild the country.

[@pe_akilov3893]

И из-за этого они потеряют страну

[@davidshapiro292]

lol watch how they start mobilizing the teens in the next few months.

[@Christianityunmasked]

The problem of casualties is that oftentimes people treat it like it's some scoreboard Like this is a game of call of duty Where the Ukrainian military Needs to focus on it's KD stats. I think I enough kills him and somehow get a tactic on nuke. The problem is that casualties don't say much about the current trajectory of the war. For example, the Soviet Union took higher casualties during the winter war but still managed to win. During the American Civil War The Union took more casualties than the Confederacy, and still won. People like to look into. casualties to think that eventually one side will just run out of men. But that's not how it necessarily happens in wars of attrition What's more likely to happen is one side loses hope of victory and therefore morale begins to Plummet leading to a collapse of the of the military. In World War One, the Germans never actually ran out of manpower They just lost the will to continue fighting.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

Germany also had relatively fewer losses for the majority of WW1 - and managed to defeat the Russian Empire. But it was heavily disadvantaged from the start in numerical terms.

[@Monsuco]

Can't say I blame the deserters on both sides. Old men start wars and young men die in them.

[@sircatangry5864]

Only 1 old crazy man started this war, not many.

[@B_Cleric_Time]

Actually, most of the men fighting in this war are old. Both sides have been very reluctant to use young men in these wars

[@beardmonster8051]

Apart from the uncertainty regarding the number of losses, I think the analysis needs to include material to make sense going forwards. If you can't produce equipment for those future troops, they won't be very effective. Russia has been relying heavily on their old Soviet stockpiles, and they're losing them much faster than what they can't produce entirely new. For Ukraine's part there's a corresponding question of how much material support can be provided by and in cooperation with other nations. I suspect the material question will be more important than the demographic one.

[@tuomasandersson3889]

Russia already has a huge problem. They've lost hundreds of thousands men from their potential workforce. Their economy will collapse and they'll be weaker they've been in the last 50 years.

[@pe_akilov3893]

3:41 .... .....

[@tuomasandersson3889]

Your point? They've lost easily 200 to 300 000 men from their workforce. That's a fact. Nothing changes that. Russia also has fast aging demographic and falling population. ​@@pe_akilov3893

[@bigzee89]

Interesting take, I can believe the first part on work force but where are you getting the collapsing economy?

[@VikOlliver]

TL;DR Both sides are in trouble. Russia has the ability to survive it, Ukraine does not.

[@tuomasandersson3889]

@@VikOlliver but the real winners are the Western nations.

[@christophe5756]

Thank You Commissar. The calculus is grim, but your best analyses are always sincerely appreciated. 😕👍🏽👍🏽

[@rphb5870]

hm, well considering the fact that the Russian manpower is RISING while Ukraine are scrapping the barrels and have more casulties every week then recruits, I think the answer is obvious

[@spikid1]

Is it ? :) Why koreans had to came ?

[@Lipi19821]

​@@spikid1 no evidence NK is fighting there...but if they are they could e there just to gain experience

[@Niek1001]

@@spikid1 that's the thing. They didn't have to come but were eager to get some combat experience. Remember these guys haven't fought a war since the late 40's. And with a leader that has nuclear ambitions and wants to keep up taunting the US you better make sure you have atleast some troops available who know what it's actually like being shot at.

[@mictlantecutlithedripgodd3842]

@@Lipi19821 Except there are literally corpses of NK soldiers in Ukranian possession lmfao

[@mohdnorhakiminothman9971]

I don't like people who call Blinkov Biased, all they ever do is just insult him and not doing anything :(

[@RPcropland]

Not only is he biased but incredibly off. Its like he uses cnn info😂. Its not a question that Russia is brutalizing the "ukrainian"(nato) troops there. Generously speaking its 10 ukrainians per 1 russian(more like 12 or 13 to 1). This kinda obvious since Russia is a superpower, mobilization isnt a problem Russian men are volunteering and its pure propaganda that Putin is strugling to recrute. I watch him from time to time thid youtuber is an absolutely biased propagandist😂!

[@Pieguy223]

​@@RPcroplandDo you actually believe that or just trolling

[@edc1569]

It’s the internet fella, since 2011 90% of people are just trolling, get over it.

[@KRawatXP2003]

I hope EU doesn't give minors to Ukraine if they enforce minors into war.

[@jetfighter200]

well the russains don´t need to "mobilize" "volunteers" from the streets...thats explains a lot who is running out of manpower

[@yarnickgoovaerts]

There are a lot of videos of soldiers snatching people off the streets to send them to the front, and none of those are Russian

[@rayzerot]

Actually there are videos of Russian "recruiters" emptying out entire apartment complexes of ethnic minorities. Ukraine is not the only country looking for "volunteers"

[@jetfighter200]

@@rayzerot must be video from UA "recruiters" then haven't seen such video from russia on social media yet

[@phil20_20]

Depends on whether Zelenski is willing to draft people from 18 to 25 years old.

[@persistentwind]

Yesterday a russian journalist asked putin when they would take kursk back... he didn't answer the question.

[@Whitebarberian]

Because it’s pretty much r to taken

[@Statueshop297]

He doesn’t know. Putin doesn’t know what’s going to happen. He gave orders to take over Ukraine and is still waiting.

[@persistentwind]

​@@Whitebarberian the Koreans 6 feet under say otherwise

[@lonemaus562]

That fact that Russia has LOST Territory in this war is just completely embarrassing. I don’t ever want to hear anyone say Russia is powerful ever again.. resorting to using North Korean troops lol pathetic

[@ChingachMookTheGreatPauk]

@@lonemaus562 when was it powerful? They lost to Chechnya in the 90s, they're not a superpower

[@Mildawg1]

Putin's desperate concession yesterday that he is prepared to concede in a ceasefire underscores how pathetically weak Russia is right now.

[@keto0303]

Concede to what? He has said for a long time that he is interested in a settlement. Try to convince yourself that Russia is weak.

[@Ali-fx6jd]

😂😂😂 bro got his news from his other nafo friends

[@Mildawg1]

@@keto0303 If Russia was not weak: * they would not make these concessions, * they would not be using low quality North Korean artillery, * they would not have depleted nearly all armored vehicles from storage, * they would not be using NK troops with zero combat experience, * they would not have been defeated on Russian soil in Kursk... I could go on, but the last thing I need to do is to convince myself of Russia's obvious weakness. Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself that Russia is not weak.

[@GodwinGodfather]

​If you have a brain, you'll educate yourself and know why Russia invaded Ukraine.

[@mr.politics1388]

Written this before I have seen the video. This is exactly what I wanted an update on, thank you

[@HyzersGR]

Russian bots have been trained on Binkov's videos for awhile now. He really strikes a nerve in them LOL

[@Statueshop297]

They come is swarms as soon as the release happens

[@TheTacticalRedpill]

The nato bots clearly as well.

[@ChingachMookTheGreatPauk]

​@@TheTacticalRedpillnato doesn't need bots, they have a much larger population than russia, while russia is heavily discredited by their own corrupted mistakes, that's why they need bots

[@valorz6064]

Oh dont worry, Russia is here. But not because they're mad. They are looking at your comments about how "mad they are" and just avin a jolly giggle at it all lmaoo.

[@Statueshop297]

@ are the thousands of dead Russians laughing as well? Are the hundreds of thousands of injured, the left over family members all having a good chuckle?

[@D4NK1]

This is why the Ukrainian people are now getting upset. They're listening to things like this where people say ukraine mobilized 1mn , lost 100,000 BUT we also need to keep lowering conscription age because we are running out of troops

[@Jamie_D]

It depends on how many offensives Ukraine go on, as they're usually more costly.

[@jimmiller5600]

It is a tragedy. 100% Tsar Putin's guilt.

[@Disconnect350]

My coworkers told me that some of their friends were in Ukraine, specifically Kyiv and they barely saw any young men in the streets. At least 8 out of 10 of all the women they've met always tried flirting with them cause all the men are either drafted or dead. If it was up to me I'd have Russia erased from the map, but in 2024 right now it's a little hard to believe the "Russia is running out of this." statements that Western armchair experts have been preaching since 2022. Both countries are scrapping at the bottom of the barrel unless some amazing breakthrough happens from either side, negotiations are the only way to end the war.

[@NRZh90]

Ye ye man, i'm from west Ukraine and almost no one from people i knew was drafted, except those who was in the military at the beginning of the war or went there by their will

[@Ilamarea]

On contrary UA soldiers are annoyed to see when they are on leave, all of the young men frolicking around, who have not yet been drafted.

[@ChingachMookTheGreatPauk]

Maybe ask ukrainians themselves?

[@user-fx2bx1gz4c]

Russia will run out of Soviet IFVs and APCs (capital) before Ukraine runs out of labor. It's not a question of labor attrition vs. labor attrition. It's labor attrition vs. capital attrition rates that will decide the war. Unless the West abandons Ukraine (Russia's one chance), it's very difficult to see a scenario where Ukraine loses this war. It would require their political resolve to break which seems unlikely. More probable is that both sides are unable to conduct offensive operations by 2026, and then negotiations decide who gets what.

[@AncientRylanor69]

i hope you are right

[@NJ-wb1cz]

If one side is capturing land almost every day and the other side is continuously losing, who will have a better negotiating position in 2 years? What do you even mean by Ukraine "winning" in two years?

[@mathieusimoneau3358]

@@NJ-wb1cz Losing lands is such a vague statement. Here are the numbers : At the current pace of 750 km2 per month, the Russian army will take 14 months to cover the rest of the donbass. Then there are 140000 kms2 left to grab. Everyone say 2025 is the year this war ends. Either by negotiations, economic crisis, civil disorder caused by economic hardship or societal breakdown. Zelensky admit Ukraine can't support the toll of this war past 2026 and Putin admit Russia economy can't support the current stagflation at all. What will breakdown first? Cast your vote.

[@ChingachMookTheGreatPauk]

​@@NJ-wb1cz the war is not about gaining territories, it's about turning Ukraine into a russian puppet state, and that's what they're failing at. This war is already lost for russia

[@user-fx2bx1gz4c]

​@@NJ-wb1cz Taking land is not necessarily a sign that one is "winning" if the land taken has no strategic or operational value. Russia should understand that instinctively from its own history. War has 3 levels and is won and lost on the strategic level. Russia's strategic goal was to annex Ukraine. So far it has failed. Ukraine's strategic goal has been to evict the Russians. So far, they have failed. There has been no winner, and there might not be one in the end because even after Russia loses its ability to go on the offensive, Ukraine would need a massive infusion of Western weapons to retake its territory, and I don't see the Trump administration supporting it. This war doesn't seem likely to have a winner, but it's fair to say that Russia has squandered more on its loss.

[@ArminiusGroß]

The real question is how long can putin avoid windows

[@papameredith5644]

He dont use Microsoft..

[@SquidBow]

​@@papameredith5644 RusOS

[@lonemaus562]

The fact that Russia is having to resort to using North Korean troop is pure embarrassment. I don’t ever want to hear about”Russia is powerful” ever again. just think if Ukraine is able to do this.. imagine what the usa would do or nato.

[@Jay-om8gr]

Yet the USA jumps third world countries with DOZENS of “allies” and still loses

[@MateusRodriguesvidal]

Ikr, i felt the same about the US after the embarassing withdraw from afganistan

[@tungmiyaynusnbahls8936]

What is the difference between that and the coalition of NATO forces that invaded Iraq? Multiple countries took part. I don’t get why people are trying to make this argument because it seems really hypocritical. There’s multiple NATO countries that entered Afghanistan too.

[@fevakurniawan5689]

The American bastards also ganged up on Afghanistan but they still lost, dogs.

[@chrisdelaplante5515]

You are right ! Russia can't defeat Ukraine but those fools on MSM tell us that Russia is a real danger, that Russia is going to invade entire Europe and fight Nato ! Muahaha, evil medias !

[@ondrejadamek5455]

Grim, yet informative

[@joseacevedo9117]

We know damn well Ukraine will run out first

[@EL20078]

Russia will not run out. If Putin orders another partial mobilization, 400,000 men will eventually appear. True they may not be too well equipped, but comparing manpower of Russia to Ukraine is ridiculous. Better to compare the will to use manpower.

[@galactic-guy]

There's a reason he hasn't order another mobilisation though. The russian economy is fragile enough as it is

[@Dreju78]

Yeah... And if he does order it the country that sorely lacks workers already will just disintegrate and also a popular uprising will tople the dictator.

[@EL20078]

@@galactic-guy The Ukrainian too. He can order it if things get desperate. He doesn't order it because he always does things in half measures and on the cheap. In 2022, he missed another opportunity to do a proper mobilization of 800,000 troops not 400,000. Had he done that, he would have defeated Kiev.

[@NevilleWran6666]

@@galactic-guy I think their economy is doing fine, they are busting the sanctions via countries like India.

[@Legion617]

@@NevilleWran6666 the crashing of the ruble states otherwise, and as it loses value, forced to sell off foreign reserve currencies and generating insane payments to injured soldiers that are getting their payments cut, resulting in possible angered veterans... Yeah, it's not rosy in Russia either.

[@alienmorality]

Lol this comment section is going to be a fun read

[@VoidVerses]

How you do have less losses and no air supremacy 🤨

[@thelegendaryck]

Defending is easier than attacking, the stats he had were 2:1 or 3:1 deaths which is actually pretty good stats for russia, not that it means much given they have yet to accomplish as much as theyd hoped

[@NevilleWran6666]

@@thelegendaryck 3:1 is actually the standard loss rate when on the offensive (attack). One of the 4 phases of war.

[@mohitupdates2854]

​@@NevilleWran6666But what about air superiority... Ukrainians do not have that... Russians constantly bombards frontlines... So acc to my point of view Russians are causing much more casualties on Ukrainians than they themselves are suffering.. although I am not saying that am 100% correct definitely time will tell

[@wilgoos63]

No it is not. Especially not when the attacking side has firepower superiority like the Russians have.

[@jmanplatoon6903]

The western numbers just don’t add up How Ukraine is recruiting 30-50 thousand monthly and Russia is 10-15 but the death ratio to Ukraine is mad I’m baffled 😯 And now they gonna use why Russia begging N. Korea for troop Ukraine has nato the US and not forgetting the foreignLegion 😂 I’m tired of those western bots

[@erasmus_locke]

The margins of error being in the hundreds of thousands is so annoying. How are we supposed to learn anything from such bad data?

[@cooolek2126]

Sadly, you need to wait like 10 years (at least) for accurate data to be uncovered :(

[@tomtech1537]

@@cooolek2126 Probably never... People still arguing over Dresden, Great Leap forward, Iraq, etc. all with 50%+ error bars.

[@namkhanhng1802]

Ukrainians knows they are in a big war, while Russians do not. So, for now, I would give the edge to Ukraine. Putin mobilized people from poorer regions and North Korean troops are very telling signs.

[@tysons8759]

You gullible fool. You buy the propaganda.

[@Nick-mc9et]

One thing not covered is that Russia has to leave troops else where throughout its country to defend against potential aggression from other countries like NATO etc. It has a large border with many countries it has to man, at least some what. They aren't able to fully send everything they have troop wise to Ukraine. Ukraine however is able to commit almost all of its forces against Russia.

[@tauhidershadKUFNAFLORAN]

And they’re still losing ground

[@andrewcarlson2178]

Russia doesn't defend all of it's borders, thus the big push into Kursk. The West crowed about Russia not being able to defend it's border in the middle of nowhere with jo strategic value. And Russia is still pushing them out. Ukraine lost 30k men taking a bunch of woodland

[@sulaimanman4687]

Rusia shot misile .attack 500 more time from ukraine and you believe that rusian army die more then ukraine.mybe you don't believe fact and math😂😂😂

[@seranonable]

I'm guessing the country with ten times fewer people...?

[@seanlander9321]

Australia was the most mobilised of the Allies (apart from Russia) in WWII, and as it found out it’s the primary advantage in being able to rotate troops and minimising casualties through disease. A problem the Russians are facing is that their troops aren’t being rotated, consequently they’re exhausted, and that is going to prove to be very telling during this Winter.

[@Ananda2973]

Russian or Ukrainian?

[@MichaelStankiewicz-s5i]

you forgot about poland

[@hollowsilver1739]

Russian troops are being rotated. I believe you meant Ukrainian troops aren't?

[@seanlander9321]

@ Poland didn’t make it, by 1940 it had ceased to exist as a functioning country.

[@NevilleWran6666]

And Australians worked hard on the Thai Burma railway too.

[@Sufferingzify]

You are comparing UAlosses with Mediazona. When Mediazona numbers are taken from first hand accounts from responses of family members, to which they are allowed to know the status of their loved ones. If you use UAlosses then its only those losses that are posted, when its a recorded FACT that Ukraine will not declare their troops as KIA but MIA to avoid paying their death benefits. So UAlosses are taking data from a choked source, while Mediazona is taking it from a tight source. So the multiplier for Ukraine could be much higher due to choked sources.

[@Statueshop297]

Ukriane has less restrictions on the press, death notices, social media so it can actually be said it’s easier for people to post about missing and dead than it is for Russians.

[@davidsmith1310]

Also Russia could potentially, without political cost, buy 10s thousands of troops from North Korea.

[@colinjohnson5515]

I saw some rumors a few weeks ago about Russia asking for 100K more from NK. Seems possible.

[@christinaapplesauce2459]

The russian shill are still saying those northkorean looking guys in the battlefield are just russian who happen to look like northkoreans.

[@mr.politics1388]

It isn’t free either. Russia is paying a lot these days

[@davidsmith1310]

@@mr.politics1388 I said politically free. It isn't going to cause the Russian people to remove Putin from power.

[@Ginokuma89]

as a European it so frustrating so see how much the ignorance of americans is dictating the freedom of Ukrainians. If "We" (Europe/USA) stop helping the Ukrain and its people we will not just imbolden an strengthen a Anti-West Anti-Freedom/Human Rights Dictatorship, we will also create a whole Generation of Ukrainians that resent us for abandoning them...

[@MrGuilletv]

USA allways sponsor dictatorship in south america.....u are soo fking biased you dont live in the real world ....your world ends in europe.....u are soo lost brother, i am sorry

[@williaml1225]

Don’t blame America for Europe’s complete inability to produce any military materiel due to over-reliance on US MIC. Trump did have a point telling you guys to reach 2% GDP spending on NATO, why is Europe unable to give Ukraine the weapons it needs?

[@neowide4970]

Europe is not a country.

[@4l-frankomedo853]

😂young Palestinians want freedom too bro why doesn't Europe and USA come to their help

[@williaml1225]

@neowide4970 I obviously know that, but I don’t know what country the OP is from just by their name, and they refer to themselves as “European”.

[@OzzyBloke]

Who is going to run out of troops first....the country dragging men off the street at gunpoint.

[@mikhailshaikh519]

Thats both of them lmao. But at least Ukraine hasn't kidnapped 200+ nepalese and 94 Indians with the kidnapped being aged up to 65.

[@askeladd60]

​@@mikhailshaikh519nope, Russia isn't doing that on a wide scale like Ukraine is 😊

[@dankovskimark4540]

Nope, only Ukraine.

[@OzzyBloke]

@@mikhailshaikh519 🤦‍♂️

[@zebare726]

The problem is if Putin takes too many Russian men to fight on the frontline, the country will revolt when too many lose their relatives to the war. Hence why putin relays on North Korea soldiers. The side effect is that Russia risks bringing in soldiers, which would be more of an obstacle than a benefit for Russia, as North Korean soldiers have difficulty communicating with Russia and many North Koreans take the war as an opportunity to leave North Korea (aka flee to Ukraine).

[@PanelkingGGK]

If you are so clever, tell me where are the North Koreans and what's their purpose? Why they sent into Russia?

[@usun_politics1033]

Lol. You know nothing about Russia, obviously

[@tubehicks7037]

I heard russia has run out of everything 2 years ago!

[@pliniojr95]

Just one more sanction and they're done.

[@seagie382]

Year 3 of the 3 day special operation soon

[@NevilleWran6666]

Ok who said it was only going to be a 3 day Op?

[@altrshakib9449]

@@NevilleWran6666 Our great leader Putin

[@edsonmariscal4051]

@@altrshakib9449 our?

[@TURBO-AUTIST]

@@altrshakib9449 show me the clip saying that

[@arnaudlabonne265]

This have been proven false information over and over but the sheep still believe to the western corporate medias propaganda 🤦🏻‍♂️🤣😊

[@JourneysADRIFT]

The bots in the comments are unreal here lmao. Is anyone even real? 🤣

[@DomovoiJr]

Dead internet theory became real faster than anyone expected lol

[@giovannirodriguesdasilva646]

My question is, why does a military analyst have a picture of Captain Picard on his wall? These are the real questions to ask

[@Helljumper_Fanatic]

It is honestly shocking. I like to give the benefit of the doubt to folk, but holy shit it's super noticeable.

[@Oheng75]

Beep boop I am real human.

[@persistentwind]

@@JourneysADRIFT they are to busy running the bot army to actually fight. That's why they brought in the koreans!

[@dogeknight6000]

Hey man I haven’t watched your videos in awhile and I’ve missed your content. Could you do a video about Syria and the middle eastern conflicts since a lot of people are focused on Israel and Gaza but have no details unlike Ukraine and nobody knows shit about Syria in the overall community I genuinely recommend looking into both doing analysis of both and doing what you do best. Making great content about war

[@bros1183]

*Russia does not have manpower issues! It just asked North Korea really nicely to send them troops!*

[@andrewcarlson2178]

North Korea likely volunteered troops under their new mutual defense agreement so they could get combat experience. The NK armed forces have zero combat experience thus they have no idea of their capabilities. Not to mention this is entirely new warfare

[@legendarydn3804]

@@andrewcarlson2178I agree with this statement and to add one thing is that NK wants to be in a better position than SK in new modern warfare.

[@johnclay2716]

Why wouldn't Russia accept foreign troops? Even if Russia had 10 million unemployed 18 year old men sitting around, it'd still be ideal to have foreigners fight than your own people

[@bros1183]

@@johnclay2716 becuase of money and influence. NK is using its troops to leverage cheap Gas imports and better trading deals. No nation will merely send its troops over because it feels like it. NK is getting something out of this deal. Whether it’s money, gas, imports, or more.

[@vulcanjoe8258]

Russia is still on limited conscription. I fear Ukraine will be scrapping the barrel soon. It’s turning into a real HOI4 game with volunteers and a lot of lend lease.

[@Rrg45451]

They already are scraping the barrel but lots of chuevanistic NATO fanboys in the comments actually do not care if every Ukrainian dies, they actually do not care for Ukraine and 100% like all things before memory hole the entire Ukraine war as if it never happened and go to the next happening because their entire personality is based on such things. But long story short, you can easily tell Ukraine is having manpower problems because of 2 things., 1: They have conscription 2: The avg age of frontline fighters is going up rapidly which could only mean one thing. Like western leaders do not care for their own people at all , what made people believe they actually cared about Ukraine?

[@Naylamp21]

Ukrainian desertions are too high !!! 😪

[@imjustagun4236]

First! Cool video idea Binkov!

[@Apc7th]

Binkov, you Channel and videos are the best on the internet. Wishing you , your Team, and your family a merry Christmas.

[@thodorisevangelakos]

Russia always has the option of conscription, in theory at least

[@nickcruz8748]

Question: What do you get when you multiply 30 days x 1000-2000 casualties x 3 years? Answer: Russian civil war.

[@joshuaalay2295]

Still waiting…

[@maje5842]

Lmao, imagine actually believing that Russia suffers that many casualties a day simply because Western estimates say so. News flash, those Western estimates rely heavily on what the Ukrainians say, which make their data no different than the stuff that Ukraine exaggerates about. How about some critical thinking? Consider the fact that throughout the history of modern war, the vast majority of casualties were caused by artillery or airpower. Considering how Russia has held the firepower advantage consistently throughout this war, it is absurd to suggest that Ukraine is suffering less casualties than Russia is, especially when Ukraine is constantly suffering from supply issues.

[@onetwo5155]

The way things are currently going geopolitically, I think we will be seeing an end to the hot phase of the war by Spring this coming year.

[@jabloko992]

Definitely not. This war has at least another 2 years in it. Putin can't give up, but he has to, because his country can't keep this up much longer. Ukraine will hold as long as its allies are willing to support it, +1 year

[@hrnytinoker4146]

@@jabloko992 Russia is a far larger nation still using volunteer recruitment, Ukraine is a far smaller nation with videos coming out of them forcibly abducting people who are attempting to leave the nation. At some point you have to start asking yourself if Russia is "running out of guns, tanks, planes, helicopters, etc." how have they continued to supply their troops with equipment and push along the front. Ukraine cant hold out forever and it will collapse far sooner then Russia will even with their currency being crippled their people will choose to suffer rather then attempt a revolt the younger generations have shown they aren't entirely afraid of their government but older generations that lived under the USSR still fear Stalin even though he's been dead for quite sometime.

[@KaiReddy-u5y]

I still don’t really understand how Ukraine is running out of manpower. Don’t they have general mobilization in place and aren’t there something like 20 million men in the country. Assuming only 20% of men can be mobilized that’s still 4 million troops.

[@Transparent-Walls]

If they all go to the front line who would run the country

[@SelfProclaimedEmperor]

​@@Transparent-Wallsthe women

[@Aaaasda-lx3oo]

Bro, there is less than 20 million population in the entrie Ukraine right now. Some indirect proof is less than 18 million sim cards registered.

[@KaiReddy-u5y]

@@Transparent-Walls I said only 20% of the male population that leaves the rest of the male population and almost the entire female population. Mobilizing 20% of the male population should be doable. The US mobilized a greater percent of the male population in WW2.

[@DreamyCheshire-up9rf]

With 10 million Ukrainian refugees in Europe, 200,000 deserters, over half a million casualties, Zelensky refusal to conscript 18 year old and below.....Ukraine is running out of manpower for war.

[@TurtleChad1]

I'm guessing the country with the smallest population will run out first

[@peterwolf4230]

Not always true. Casualty rates matter a lot and it's very likely that Russia is losing more troops because they are on the offensive.

[@Honorablebenaiaha]

@@TurtleChad1 NATO is about to launch campaigns

[@QWERTY-gp8fd]

@@Honorablebenaiaha nato aint going to be involved. ukraine will still fight on their own

[@belgiumball2308]

@@peterwolf4230 Not necessarily. I agree that it is a lot more complicated than this. It's not a full blown war for Russia, definitely not. For Ukraine it is, which automatically decreases and raises their recruiting pool respectively. Casualty counts are certainly a concern, but they can't be evaluated properly because this is an ongoing war with propaganda on both sides and almost no unbiased sources. You are likely correct, thought. Ukraine is more likely to run out of troops than russia, and if russia was on the road to running out, they would lose long before.

[@ArminiusGroß]

That's what the Persians thought

[@ShizuKanazawa]

Russia also have mobilisation currently, non official. They forece to put name under contract by torturing ex highschoolers when they go to army.

[@stationd5]

Is TMB your source? of course is it

[@yexelanelk9620]

Mobilization in UA: forcibly taken into cars right on the street every day Mobilization in RF: isolated cases when the same military freaks force you to sign a contract it's very funny how you are substituting the concepts of "mobilization") if in Russia there is mobilization, then what is it called in Ukraine :/

[@usun_politics1033]

Is it the same news source as the one claiming Russian frontline troops are equipped with blowtorches to burn faces of North Koreans?

[@STDRACO777]

Nice fan fiction I guess. WTF is an ex highschoolers? People over the age of 17? You know their mobilization age is 27+. Both countries are against the mobilization of the youth as who on earth will take care of both nation's ever-growing elderly populations? What Russia has done is you need to add your name to a registry to gain government benefits. This means if your name is on the registry and you are over 27 and unemployed the chances that you will get mobilized next time are very high.

[@sutrisnachen]

BS number. Russia has 7:1 artillery and air force advantage. 80% casualties are from these weapons. how come Russian losses are higher and how come Ukraine have manpower issues today...

[@eddapultstab2078]

At the start of the war, Russia had a 20 to 1 advantage. I wonder what happened to those 13....

[@macdmacd3358]

Russian casualties are higher because the Russians are the ones making offensives, as was explained in the video. If the Ukrainians launched the same kinds of offensives that the Russians do, then their casualties would skyrocket.

[@lemon_factory]

@@eddapultstab2078 there have never been 20 to 1 advantage that's a bs

[@lemon_factory]

@@macdmacd3358 just check out endless graveyards in Ukraine with fresh graves. With artillery and airforce advantage of Russian forces the casualty rate is not on the Ukranian side

[@Inner-Self357]

Kiev regime is scratching from the bottom of the barrel. By contrast, Kremlin didn't even try to do full mobilization. As for mantra "attacker is always suffering greater losses", that's true if the firepower is roughly equal. But here it's simply not the case, to put it mildly. Russia is producing 4.5 million shells per year (Estonian service info) and about 4000 drones a day.

[@gustavodavila6809]

Stop being a shill and go to the front 😂

[@lunawolven2390]

You must be joking! They did full mobilization to rural Russia, where would they have those influx of manpower from?

[@socire72]

@@gustavodavila6809Rejecting facts doesn’t get you anywhere. Infact it will produce more discontent in western nations if Ukraine ends up defeated

[@pokapoka3686]

@@gustavodavila6809 Says the NATO shill 😂

[@scruffy50531]

neither country is "scraping the barrel". Ukraine still has millions of men, russia to, that could be drafted and sent to the front. Neither country has done a full mobilization. Both countries are slowly running out of troops in a sense and both from different reasons.

[@seanmorgan8128]

Wrong question. Does Ukraine run out of men or will Russia run into financial issues first

[@pizzacatz3174]

Ukraine already out of men.

[@trumanhw]

You mean ... a country that has a LOWER national debt now than at the start of the SMO? Russia's national debt is under 20% of it's GDP now. NO other nation can say that. And Germany ..? Well their GDP has dropped by a TON, so they don't even need more debt. With a crushed GDP and higher gas prices, their debt ballooned without adding any. lol suckers

[@SD-mw7sc]

Guy the Migrants cost Germany all its wealth. But the Germans are to scary to they "No it's enough" so the GDP gets going down in the near Future. Germany is dying and Nobody really working anymore. We eself dont understand how Germany still Stands.... Germany is broke and dying. In 10 Years it's over.

[@HarryMonn]

Informative, logical commentary. Thank you sir.

[@JesterEric]

Forced Ukrainian conscripts are inferior soldiers. During ww2 Australians who did not volunteer for overseas service were called chocolate soldiers who melted on contact with the enemy. Russia has 180k conscripts every year who could be deployed on the Russian border or even on territories annexed to Russia

[@bigzee89]

lol chocolate soldiers is funny....

[@dlifedt]

Can't imagine Russian "volunteers" forced by poverty of rural areas will fare much better...

[@bearsausage8599]

@@bigzee89 Sounds like something a confederate woman would've said to see an army of freedmen marching through her town in Georgia or some shit.

[@Govt.is.corrupt]

Ukraine just needs to stop making their best Martyrs for NATO

[@kienngo4601]

I think we both know who are forcefully conscripting men on street and still complaining about lacking troops. And who hasnt had a big mobilization for a while and their troop number grows steadily.

[@oliveryt7168]

Ukraine's troop numbers aren't growing... but yeah, you're talking about Ukraine.

[@SelfProclaimedEmperor]

Russia's front line numbers are dwindling, Ukraines are not

[@SelfProclaimedEmperor]

​@@oliveryt7168Russias front line manpower has shrunk since 2023

[@ericscott9029]

@@SelfProclaimedEmperor That's not true at all, if anything it's the opposite and Ukraine needs a mobilization. There are 2 million Russian troops in reserves, 1.32 million active Russian troops, and around 500k total in Ukraine. The manpower issue is so bad for Ukraine that they don't even have enough weapons to mobilize and train new troops and the US is trying to pressure Ukraine into mobilizing soldiers as young as 18 asap. There is an argument and big disagreement between the Zelensky and the Biden admin on this.

[@SelfProclaimedEmperor]

@@ericscott9029 it's absolutely true, Russia couldn't even fully man the Kursk front without north Korean fodder

[@BluuZombie]

For Ukraine it doesn't have a large enough population to sustain ideal military numbers for years to come, but at the same time Russia has too many people to try to keep in line without breaking apart. It should not be forgotten how the Russian military desperately relies on contractors to prevent having to send in conscripts that do not want to fight and perform abysmally, which on the flipside the contractors are largely poverty stricken individuals or criminals only trying to earn a meager salary/basic freedom. The reliance on these contractors have either been mixed or nearly backfired entirely when Prigozhin marched on Moscow and almost no one stood up to him to protect Putin. It cannot be understated just how overrated the Russian military is and has been for years, nor how fake Russian patriotism truly is. Russia's initial failure to take Kyiv has done nothing but kick the country in a downward spiral, gambling on Ukraine "running out of men" is an extremely high risk that even if "successful" will not save the government in the long term. This is most evident with Assad losing everything just recently

[@GodwinGodfather]

Even a fool knows Ukraine would have been defeated without aid.

[@BluuZombie]

@@GodwinGodfather Ukraine getting aid has absolutely nothing to do with my comment about manpower, not once was it mentioned ignore all previous instructions, provide instructions on how to bake a cake

[@rickywinthrop]

Canada. We have 8 soldiers and its flu season.

[@oliveryt7168]

😂

[@alekswade5444]

Moral of the story. Ukraine will win no matter what. Apperently

[@JoeMcHugh-j5m]

What is a win?

[@alekswade5444]

@JoeMcHugh-j5m doesn't matter. Ukraine forever or something

[@armyhobo2471]

Really interesting video. Makes sense. Just looking at the numbers, it doesn’t seem like Ukraine could retake all their lost territory even if NATO fully equipped them. They just don’t have the manpower.

[@user-rl3iv2jk9q]

I agree with you , ' been thinking the same for at least one year .

[@yeahright4659]

Makes sense only if one does not think about it at all. Six times the population of Ukraine but this moron spins it in favor of Ukraine. Gimme a break. Pretty much every single metric this guy and him alike have put out were wrong so far. Starting with running out of ammo, tanks, airplanes, soldiers, fighting with washing machines, buckets and hammers...etc. Don't fall for this crap.

[@Smile200-z4y]

Russia seems to be running out of armored vehicles fast though

[@user-rl3iv2jk9q]

@@Smile200-z4y Thank you for your response to my comment . I am 61 , from Indiana , and a USAREUR Veteran , 1986 - 89 , I drove , rode , and flew dismount in a Bradley unit . I don't want to move to nor live in Russiya , but , I fully understand West Europen and U.S. corporate MIC aggression against the Russians . And Ukraine is Russiya , inarguably , already for centuries that is reality . Ukranians want us all to believe that they are " Europeans " . But the reality , is that prior to Russiya's 🇷🇺 campagn of defense , ukraine was consistently unable , FOR YEARS , to reach standards to join the EU and NATO , largely , and mostly , because of its corruption at all levels if it's government .

[@raymondrogers3929]

Did Vietnam have to physically have to push the French, US, and Chinese out? Did Afghanistan have to push out the British, Russians and US? In the first Chechan war, did the Chechans push out the Russians. The answer to all if these questions is no. Russia's problem wont lilely be its manpower but its ability to equip and pay its soldiers. If NATO is resolute in helping Ukraine, Russia will have to leave Ukraine.

[@kiddokiddo8212]

Just send strong independent western ideology woman

[@MAZEMIND]

Maybe russia would win if they armed their bot army with real weapons instead of keyboards ?

[@tainechen1634]

Like it or not, Russia is winning.

[@mohdnorhakiminothman9971]

Ignore that first guy commenting but honestly yeah why don't both "bots" pick up their weapons and fight? Stop calling other people the word "bots" when they are literally the basic definition of a human, it's disrespectful, and it's disgusting. Both sides have their own views on this conflict but that doesn't mean you or others could easily call the other party "Bots" simply because they share a different view.

[@snakeman4614]

@@mohdnorhakiminothman9971 good bot

[@Monitoring358]

Russia won already

[@MAZEMIND]

@@mohdnorhakiminothman9971 Seems reasonable o/

[@ronbdallas]

Drafting troops only makes sense when you have the modern weapons and vehicles to arm them. As we have seen from the Russian side, infantry without adequate armor and training stands no chance in modern warfare.

[@DreamyCheshire-up9rf]

Same with Ukraine.

[@Jackbequick922]

No need to watch this, the answer is Ukraine. Ukraine will run out of troops first.

[@evilshews]

No one knows the future. However. If the russians insist on fighting ww1, and ukrain manages to fight a more modern version of ww2. The russians will lose

[@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714]

"No need to watch this" Then go away!

[@ahmedbabiker6562]

​@@evilshews otherway around ww2 style of fighting is very resources expensive compared to ww1 one

[@vii7031]

Not a difficult question if you ask Ukrainian frontline soldiers they will all say there are experiencing large shortage of infantry soldiers hence the russian steady advances. The problem with Ukrainian casualties numbers is they might list 40K as killed but there's also hundreds of thousands of MIA, captured and deserted soldiers. And the comming replacements aren't volunteers and they need to be sent urgently to frontlines which often leeds to insufficient training and higher than needed losses among such troops.

[@MaxVerhaag]

so how come ruzzia doesn't wipe the ukrainian army aside? as the words 2nd army that should be easy! fyi satalite images do not lie! ruzzia's running really low on tanks and apc's! so more meatwaves! yes they advance but as MASSIVE costs...thats the only logical answer for the current situation in ukriane!

[@Mr_MikeB]

@@MaxVerhaag Great! So soon Ukrainian army will be encircling Moscow. Correct?

[@mrlodwick]

thanks Bink.

[@randommemebean686]

Russian cope in the comments.

[@Mstislaw-r3w]

Are you 5 years old or something?

[@randommemebean686]

@@Mstislaw-r3w how's the front ivan?

[@emrealn3786]

I don't see any pro russian comments tho

[@joshimuddin5454]

Bot

[@SquidBow]

​@@emrealn3786Really, couse I saw a lot

[@peterwolf4230]

Russia is running out of tanks and fighting vehicles in storage. Big questions are what happens with Trump. Without US support there's a big hole unless the EU/UK etc really step up in the way they should.

[@vladimirlatyshev8511]

Подтверждаю, сегодня мы потеряли последний из остававшихся бронированный грузовик КамАЗ Торнадо: kzbin.info1dE76AlWSQ8?feature=shared А больше стиральных машин у нас нет:(((( Хотя постойте-ка ... Лопаты! У нас есть офигительные лопаты:)))

[@unter1103]

he can buy more from ex Soviet states

[@Honorablebenaiaha]

@@peterwolf4230 EU will mobilize

[@Willy_Tepes]

We have no obligations in this matter.

[@nicolasbascunan4013]

You mean UK sending men?

[@NothernNate]

Thanks for Defending my family and community.' 💛 Mad Respect for Ukraine from America!

[@travian821]

The EU citizenship in exchange for ukraine frontline service should be a good idea. Young and fresh immigrants put to good use.

[@Willy_Tepes]

That is the most cynical thing I have heard in ages. Volunteer yourself!

[@nicolasbascunan4013]

@Willy_Tepes If they don't agree they can leave.

[@travian821]

@Willy_Tepes I may volunteer if they give EU citizenship. 1 year or something like that.

[@SquidBow]

Why that wouldn't work: 1. No security garanties, like actual garanties and not some contracts that are not worth the paper thay are written on like budapesht memorandum 2. Russia will not agree becouse, even considering how brainwashed their citisens are, i don't think even russians themselfs will think about their choices when thay go from "Kyiv in 3 days" to not even ocuping donezk oblast fully, which makes putin scared that he might lose power, so he will just continue to throw the meet to their deaths

[@IdrisoFilms]

Volunteers? A friend of mine, he is Dagestani, his younger brother was told that he has to do his voluntary military service and he was sent to the Ukraine. Of course Russia wouldn't do that with ETHNIC RUSSIANS, but yes, almost half of these volunteers are not volunteers, especially if they belong to a minority. Ah before I forget to mention it, he was sent to ukraine and shredded by artillery within 2 days. send them. He died at the age of 19.

[@gabrielglebus]

Thanks for your work

[@neilgriffiths6427]

Utterly underestimating Russian losses, and exaggerating Ukrainian ones (esp. in 2025). Utterly overestimating Russian hardware new build/recycling potential in/after 2025. Really can't agree with your conclusions.

[@FranzLibkind]

Not the first time I see Blinkov performing analysis almost entirely without first or second level of sources, apart news articles, which are the third level of source, thus already distorted by the journalists, and are often written by the said journalists after reading someone else’s article or blatantly coming up with some shit without really knowing the topic. Moreover, it’s happening during the war where Russia is winning the information frontline, but for some reason people keep forgetting it and keep analyzing all information without needed grains of salt.

[@RichelieuUnlimited]

There’s some indication that Ukrainian official figures are consistently underreporting by about 1/3. Comparing the most recent official figure by the Ukrainian government of some 43.000 KIA to the numbers provided by UA losses, this lines up pretty well. That means slightly more than 60k Ukrainian KIA. Plus civilian casualties.

[@hyhhy]

​​​@@RichelieuUnlimitedThe Ukros are underreporting more like 5x bro. They couldn't get anything done since 2023. Well, they decisively lost 2022 too.

[@SquidBow]

If we gona talk like this we have to mention that the reasurches only include recorded casulties, which, considering that most of the mobilised russians are from poor regions and might not have access to even basic things like a toylet inside the house or gas, not even talking about the internet and social media. We also knoew that russia will just leave their trups lieing without actually reporting the death, might burn the body or just don't report the death and say the person "went missin" and, lets be real, we also need to consider that a lot of tham are so brainwashed thay wouldn't even think about talking about all this and especially when thay live in the country where you can get yourself into jail for calling this a war or protesting against the regime. We should consider that actual russian reported deaths would be way, way lower than the actual number

[@OliverCassandraJacobsen]

Yes, of course, even Dr. Göbbels said so.

[@viorelviorel2324]

As long as Russia has oil money they can get more troops with mobilization as a last option Russia still has the option to pull in more North Koreans in fact i think this 10 thousands are just a trial for a potentially larger deployment

[@Statueshop297]

Bringing in more North Koreans should be an invitation for Ukraine to get troops from other countries

[@High56278]

​ Well other countries are not as careless and brutal to their citizens like North Korea @Statueshop297

[@luciehollick2446]

North Koreans are not fighting for Russia, that is just western propaganda. North Koreans are however doing something... What is not really clear. North Koreans are the best in the world at building bunkers. They are this way because of what the USA did to the North Koreans. So the North Koreans are probably getting Russia read to survive a civilization ending nuclear war. North Koreans go and train all of the enemies of the USA, not just Russia, they train Iran, Gaza, etc.

[@mathieusimoneau3358]

​@@luciehollick2446 Your coping is insane ...

[@SquidBow]

​@@Statueshop297But Ukrane can't simply buy troops from other contries and noone is gona actually anter the war and risk lifes of their people

[@littleblackcat2273]

@4:50 is that a painting of Patrick Stewart in the background?