Birdman movie review

Michael Keaton stars as Michael Keaton-ish...A former Superhero actor trying to produce a play, and we all get to watch, in what looks like a 1 shot movie! Jeremy reviews "Birdman" or "The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance"!
See more videos by Jeremy here: / jeremyjahns
Follow Jeremy on Twitter: / jeremyjahns
Friend Jeremy on Facebook: / realjeremyjahns
Subscribe to Jeremy's blog at www.JeremyJahns.com

[@TheMrKlump]

Really expected it to get awesometacular especially after you said it was revolutionary.

[@afolabibukola1230]

Definitely worth buying is a higher rating than awesometacular.

[@Jabdimus]

Afolabi Bukola not its not

[@afolabibukola1230]

Javier Cardenas Of all of Jeremy's reviews I've seen, the ones he's praised the most are given worth buying. Also, telling someone a movie's awesome and should go see it in the cinema a few times versus spending more times the money and having the movie available on blu ray at all times, which sounds like the higher praise?

[@estivel15]

Afolabi Bukola No. Awesometacular is the highest rating. It means the movie is 10/10, you must see it as well as owe it on BlueRay.

[@afolabibukola1230]

Estivel Garcia But I haven't seen him mention Blu ray and awesometacular together. Not that I remember. Does he have an official rating chart or something?

[@JamesCPotter13]

we could get Woody Harrelson. He's in Hunger Games Michael Fassbender? He's in the Prequel to the Xmen Prequel. That one guy, Jeremy Renner. He's an Avenger. THEY GAVE HIM A CAPE TOO?

[@bradwright9477]

I love the Its Always Sunny in Philadelphia reference in the beginning!

[@arths7241]

Brad Wright I would love if Jeremy did like a review for the show to get more people into it

[@iansalinas412]

Brad Wright champion of the sun!

[@salty3723]

He nearly hit the notes as good as Dennis

[@stickwoodthebrand]

Brad Wright what was it I must’ve missed it

[@DoomRulz]

It's Batman vs. Tyler Durden. 'nuff said.

[@SilentTree12]

Batman vs the Hulk

[@johnstriker480]

And the Hulk made out with Spider-Man's girlfriend

[@NaihanchinKempo]

yep but it is so much more

[@subrsubrr334]

John Striker . . . and Spider-Man's girlfriend is Batman's daughter . . . oh my God . . .

[@BrickBuster2552]

He's a lot like the Joker in Arkham Knight, except, he gives better advice. And he doesn't have as much fun with the world around Riggan, the than that one part in the hospital bathroom and the action scene that's not actually happening.

[@davidevans3353]

SPOILER I personally believe that he did die when he shot himself on stage, the movie is one continuous shot up until the moment where he shoots himself then it cuts to the hospital. When he wakes up he has everything he ever wanted. He has a happy daughter, a good review, his wife, the flowers he wanted and he is finally relevant and when Emma stone looks up and smiles he is imagining her seeing him the way he has always seen himself. So in conclusion I believe that the final scene of the movie is his dying fantasy.

[@GEORGETHOMAS2001]

That's actually a great fuckin theory, 3 years later, lol

[@rednoob8954]

David Evans you are amazing

[@dankerbell]

nah

[@nateds7326]

Well thats valid but I believe the ending was legitimate. Because your theory while probably true is kind of depressing.

[@finnuroc9060]

David Evans that is actually so true your brain is so big, i hated it when that was the only cut but now i understand why

[@brentalfloss]

I was hoping you'd do this one! :)

[@tomstonemale]

Can you do a song for Abe's Odyssey? Or Grim Fandango? love your channel.

[@RC15O5]

I love the music from Abe's Oddysee.

[@MikeeYowee]

Remaining must watch films for this year: 1. Birdman 2. Nightcrawler 3. Whiplash 4. The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies [Edit] Disabled comments. Might get spoiled by jerks.

[@Stellaacee]

Just saw Nightcrawler yesterday and enjoyed every second of it!

[@gbjdna7338]

Inherent Vice. Atleast in my opinion. Wait, this is the internet. FUUUUUU

[@dankerbell]

did you really?

[@insertname8889]

Really tho?

[@samfisher9562]

Really?

[@deanml116]

This movie's overrated. The acting was awesome, and so was the camera work... but when I really just sat there watching it I felt like it was going nowhere. It's not a film that I would care to watch more than once. The movie revolves around interest in the characters to drive it. Maybe I just didn't like it because people don't interest me, events they're involved in do.

[@grnarrow7695]

so you didn't catch the messages the film was trying to convey? thats what makes the flim not "overrated" it's not jsut a film your supposed to watch. you have to THINK while your watching it. thats the point man. the whole scene where he is loosing his shit and birdman is following him baisically sums up what I am saying to you right now

[@emoraytorres6842]

I agree,I only saw the first 20minutes of this movie and saw it was gonna b one of those weird movies like "punch drunk love"or" silver linings playbook"

[@SeanChandlerTalksAbout]

Emo Ray Torres "Silver Linings Playbook" was weird?

[@brunogonz86]

I guess you don't like character studies, which is completely fine

[@LAmotionPics]

I agree. I think it's overrated. But I still like some aspects of it. Like the cinematography. What bothers me, is its type of dark humour. There's just too much of it. And I get that it is part of the story, which is what that bothers me.

[@TiagoAMGomes]

Alfred Hitchcock did the one shot thing first. Watch "Rope", it's amazing.

[@VicenteTorresAliasVits]

There have been others before as well, like LA CASA MUDA (and its remake SILENT HOUSE). But according to the reviews, BIRDMAN is the first movie to make it feel authentic.

[@kreepykulture]

Silent house did it a few years ago too I think? It's that horror movie with Elizabeth Olsen.

[@Lucols4]

love that movie

[@adamroat]

Or Russian Ark. Which actually did it. (99 mins, no cuts, totally real)

[@neilchatterjee7644]

Aroat I literally looked the comments section of this video just to point out Russian Ark.

[@LoN3wOlF5tudi0s]

I think this movie is easily an Awesometacular, I loved it!

[@tomascanevaro4292]

+Captain Sunshine bluray is 4 stars, awsomtacular is 5 stars

[@aceshaun]

Just wondering why this didn't get an "Awesometacular" rating, Jeremy? I mean you didn't really criticise it so what kept it off the top?

[@EzraSchwartz1]

Just because a movie doesn't have any major criticisms doesn't automatically make it an awesometacular. It's not like grades in school, where you start off at 100 and get points off for things you got wrong. It's more of how you generally feel about the movie after watching it. And also, he did say that it dragged on a bit.

[@TheDrunkestSailor]

Maybe he'll do a spoiler video on it where he goes deeper into its faults... or some shit.

[@Friemelkubus]

***** It's probably because it didn't get him excited excited. He thought it was a cool experience, saw how well shot and acted it was but it just wasn't his genre. Just a hypothesis though.

[@tigerija]

So, its a movie worth for you collection and to rewatch it few times in the future I'd say.

[@Sousabird]

He said that he thought it would have been better if they trimmed the ending. Something to the effect of if it had ended where you thought it would then it would have been fine, or the second time, or the third.

[@Jewbaka15]

This film confused the hell out of me. Firstly I wasn't sure if he had super powers or was just mental (the birdman voice in his head). After an hour into I was sure he had superpowers but then when he wakes up from the street and flies around New York lands back at the theatre a taxi driver comes into shot and says "hey you didn't pay for your cab fair" therefore me thinking its in his head, he's mental and that he didn't fly. Then at the end he starts flying again? Secondly the way its shot is kinda like a play. Its as if you're watching a play in a play. Yes its different and quirky but the camera work just confused me in regards to time of the day. Also I don't know how it was portraid around the world but in the UK it was bigged up as a quirky comedy. I don't remember laughing even once. After 90 minutes I just wanted it to hurry up and end. Sorry if you disagree, i'm just giving my opinion on the film.

[@Nazgull123]

I think the jazz music made me really dislike this film.

[@p93ahk2006]

this kind of film is just not for you, I personally find it interesting. btw he didnt have powers, listen closely to the crowd when it enters credit. he died.

[@Jewbaka15]

Blip Blop If he died why did his daughter look out the window look up and laugh? Again another moment of confusion. I get this film isn't for everyone (me in particular) but there are so many moments where you're like "wait, what the fuck?"

[@jeffreykim105]

I feel as though the reason why she looked up and laugh may be because she became mental, getting it passed down from her father. It's either that or he really does have powers 😂 it can go either way really

[@Jewbaka15]

Jeffrey Kim Which is the point im getting across. This film doesn't leave you in suspense leaving the cinema like "oh wow maybe they meant this" instead you leave thinking "huh?" was he mental or could he fly? The film try's to be be too "indie" for my liking

[@EldritchAugur]

I've never actually seen It's Always Sunny, but I still got your intro because of Achievement Hunter.

[@kitsomno]

To what video are you referring too? Keywords to search no links.

[@EldritchAugur]

7Reatz Achievement Hunter's Let's Play channel, it's just called Let's Play.

[@g-luisy5253]

***** That's how I got the reference as well. AH is the reason why I watch Always sunny too, since the guys talk about so much. It's pretty good

[@Ittakesthecakes]

Please watch it! Literally the best comedy I've ever seen. But you have to be in to the kind of humour.

[@EldritchAugur]

Laurentz I'm a really hard laugh, I hate most comedy shows which is why I am extremely picky about the ones that I watch. Arrested Development is mine.

[@fredmanto]

Wait so this isn't a movie about Harvey Birdman Attorney at Law?

[@TrisToons]

it's annoying that Jeremy only gives Awsometacular to big blockbusters...

[@moviemaster8510]

He gave 12 Years a Slave an awesometacular last year (and would Nightcrawler count as a blockbuster? Because if it doesn't, he gave that an awesometacular too).

[@fermacfarlane8721]

Its annoying he dislikes movies because they bore him (see bh6, zero dark thirty, killing them softly etc)

[@ZWarrior006]

***** To be honest, I'd hate a movie, too, if it made me go the fuck to sleep

[@NamelessRedWolf]

***** What? That's a perfectly valid reason to dislike a movie.

[@TrisToons]

Movie reviewers should have a wide taste, I'm not saying Jeremy doesn't, but if any professional reviewer prefers action movies over all other genera of film and this is evident with his scores, that seriously limits your demographic. P.S. Maybe I need to reiterate, BUT I'M NOT SAYING THIS APPLIES TO JEREMY!

[@anubiisdoesthiis]

After reading comments on this review and "Interstellar" it's clear what's terribly wrong with our perception of the scoring system. The score is clearly more important to us viewers than the actual words of the reviewer throughout the review. No matter how positive or negative a reviewer's remarks are it all falls down to the score. Here we are on Jeremy's channel complaining about "Birdman" and "Interstellar" not getting the precious "Awesometacular" score because so many of us loved these movies and seemingly lesser quality movies from this year did earn that score. Jeremy and other critics are burdened with a double-edged sword. If Jeremy threw out "Awesometaculars" left and right he would be criticized for being too lenient. Alternatively, if he withheld "Awesometaculars" to the point where he could count on one hand how many movies deserved it at the end of the year he would be criticized as too picky or a stuck-up snob. Chris Stuckmann faced this problem this year due to getting several complaints about not giving out enough "A+s." We are ALL guilty of doing this, including myself, and before we have a knee-jerk reaction and attack the reviewer, we need to examine the importance of everything leading up to the score rather than solely examining the score itself. "What is 'Awesometacular' to you, Jeremy?" "What is an 'A+' to you, Chris?" No, what is 'Awesometacular' or an 'A+' to YOU? All the factors that draw you to your conclusion (the score) mean more than you could possibly imagine to the point where the conclusion (the score) is futile.

[@tomstonemale]

Sad thing is that Jeremy's rating was supposed to avoid that. "Awesometacular" only means that he really liked the movie but people think it's a 10/10 rating thefore the movie should be near perfect.

[@brahmas1685]

Be careful or you might bring down the house with all that TRUTH!

[@deumolo]

Awesome comment.

[@juan-davidmora1970]

Well said

[@lich109]

tomstonemale EXACTLY. This is why when he started he didn't use a rating system, but then people were complaining about not understanding if he liked a movie, or didn't like a movie, or not getting how much he liked a movie, so he tried to avoid that and ended up with the same problem. It's about as bad as the Man of Steel comments.

[@matthewbecker3997]

Haha the critic monologue kinda made me hate critics. Except you cool, jeremy- i just dont always agree with you.. (cough) (cough) intertellar was better than you made it out to be.. Anyway Birdman is the best film this year undoubtedly.

[@HardcoreGamer101508]

If you're really that narrow-minded to believe a caricature in a movie, you should start to research a little more. The critic in Birdman was so over-the-top and one-dimensional that you'd have to be a complete ignoramus to think that represents the standard critic.

[@turnerevans4176]

***** Armond White is one such example.

[@matthewbecker3997]

***** not entirely what i meant, but yeah it was over the top, but in the same sense its true. just like in ratatouille, like some critics hate art because of the creators and not the work as itself. also a lot of them are over the top in defending themselves against people who disagree... see jeremyjahns interstellar spoiler talk. like why was he so pissed? im starting to believe that a lot of critics think that they hold the power of a movie being good or not which is a joke. which Birdman pointed out flawlessly and yeah a little over the top, but you cant seriously say that there arent critics like her out there

[@ELcinco6dos]

Agreed, this has been the best film this year. Even if Jeremy doesn't agree, an Awesometacular is well deserved. I also didn't agree with some of his complaints on Interstellar.

[@mindovermovies]

Wait till you see Foxcatcher my friend.

[@samthebeast00835]

I think Birdman might just be one of the greatest movies I've seen

[@jbone2345]

This shit is trash! You seriously believe this is better than godfather, pulp fiction, saving private ryan the list goes on and on.

[@georgepool2241]

@@jbone2345 it's objectively not trash from every perspective, i think it could be put in the same league of movies like the godfather, pulp fiction etc. but it's personal preference whether you agree, however, you can't say that it is at all a bad film

[@jbone2345]

@@dkdi6265 shut yo dumbass up!

[@Zaz5y]

@@jbone2345 You’re trolling

[@HugoSoup57]

Kevin Kuehn You’re a dumbass. Saving Private Ryan is one of the best war films of all time. If you found it boring or a snooze fest, then you have terrible taste in movies. Go watch Transformers, Michael Bay fanboy

[@5carecrow94]

This movie was friggin amazing. All you whiners in the comments should just go back to watching Transformers schlock.

[@DiePieCLOCK]

Dude, respect other's opinion. Everyone has different taste in movie. I can see why people are split with the movie, but don't let them change your enjoyment of the movie! :D

[@benwong8713]

+Harraz Haris Except after Birdman's unarguable argument, you really can't respect other people's opinions when they disagree with this movie. "Yeah, feed them shit!"

[@CryWolf-sm9iw]

Bet you won't watch it a second or third time.

[@5carecrow94]

Mike Paul I've watched it three times, fuck you.

[@yourmom-yv2xk]

+Mike Paul watched it 5 times...

[@Cassandra6]

Smooth It's Always Sunny reference

[@31webseries]

I did love that.

[@jgsl04]

So many idiots in the comments section. Do people really think Jeremy factors in a movie's budget or whether it's a blockbuster before he gives it his score? Of course he doesn't. Jeremy gives awesometaculars to movies he really loves. That's up to his own personal taste. Buy it on Blu-Ray means he still really really liked the movie - it just didn't appeal to his taste quite enough for him to give it he top rating.

[@drewbridger]

Birdman was probably one of the best written and most impressively shot films I've seen in a while. Definitely deserves some BAFTA awards, if not some Oscars. It has a lot going for it!

[@sennajordan7968]

Wow Jeremy can review non-mainstream movies?

[@mindovermovies]

Ummmm he just reviewed Nightcrawler last week.

[@Lucols4]

***** if it's not a superhero movie it's a overly pretentious hipster movie...

[@TheBongSauce]

Still hasn't done the Raid..

[@allenpalin]

i just don't understand how he keeps open doors with his mind...? i know its metaphorical but what does it mean?

[@LuisSierra42]

Maybe he does have superpowers, it is intentionally ambiguous

[@stanman8334]

"opening shot of Goodfellas" mistake

[@sinisterkiid2301]

I loved Birdman. Probably the best movie this year. Keaton absolutely deserves all of the awards he's getting, and so far, is a lock for the Oscar IMO

[@b0de]

Birdman is my favorite movie of the year so far. Its This year's Gravity. Super innovative and interesting

[@filmjkk]

Hm both same cinematographer. Interesting

[@MkTSensei]

JKK Films And Both Mexican directors hmmm

[@raymondosullivan5102]

I thought gravity was complete trash. What did you like about it?

[@b0de]

Beautiful cinematography, beautiful cgi, great music, long tracking shots, simple, yet emotional and uplifting story about second chances and never giving up...need I say more sir?

[@wv74]

Chris Bode nope i think that's all the cliche's you could have listed, can't think of any more, good work though

[@gertomoberstep6229]

Not Awesometacular? Huh...

[@TheBenwardy]

YH whats with that

[@juan-davidmora1970]

He also gave the hobbit buy it in blue-ray, and we all know how much he enjoys those types of films, so buy it on blue-ray isn't a bad rating at all

[@lubbucs546]

Michael Keaton should play the next Joker.

[@mindovermovies]

haha .. for an older version him or william defoe would be perfect !

[@haywoodjablome7739]

No.. Jake Gyllenhaal

[@tomstonemale]

HaywoodJablome I second this.

[@jackgreen4951]

The joker is overrated

[@TheBlackLodger]

Lol

[@6inchkilo]

My favorite monologue from Keaton is when he tells the jellyfish story. This makes the character so much more human in my opinion.

[@themoosefigs3331]

Nice reference to Always Sunny at the beginning.

[@davidstubbs2361]

Love that Always Sunny reference

[@paulmeredith9404]

People stop focusing on the rating Jeremy is giving it. If you look at his video from 2010 when he created his ratings, he said that he really doesn't like the idea of ratings because people focus more on the rating than the content of the review (which is what everyone is doing now). His ratings are a way to sarcastically make fun of ratings. They have no merit to them, but what he says about the film does.

[@Theolppoman]

This movie is amazing. A true masterpiece of cinema

[@tylerdurden4483]

Theolppoman what makes this so amazing?... This movie was a huge bore..

[@BrickBuster2552]

Birdman: Or (The Unexpected Virtue Of Making A Movie That's An Allegory For Itself)

[@harlonmeeks]

Great acting, great production value, shitty movie. The most pretentious piece of shit I've seen all year. Basically an inside joke for those within the industry. I had to try to like this movie and still couldn't. Give me mullholand dr or all that jazz as a self aware film about films. Overrated.

[@EvaGreenFanPennyDreadful]

was it a sort of broadway versus hollywoood inside joke? Can you explain?

[@malikwhite22]

Karen Devine if you seen the movie you would see where hes getting at. Like CB4 for broadway/indie movie industry

[@bluesorcerer83]

You say overrated, I say underappreciated. Glad it was not the case of the Academy (this year).

[@NJLProductions]

2014: "if anyone asked me if a movie could be like that id say absolutely not" 2020: 1917 - hold my beer

[@jasonlee6522]

but hes saying that birdman was the first one to do it ? lol

[@sameerhafeez7029]

Jason Lee technically Russian Ark was the first one, 2002

[@felixcatora4105]

There is a movie which is entirely one shot. Look up the movie *"Russian Ark"*.

[@zombii08]

Seriously, he should have done a little research before he makes a claim like that. Also, I feel like could have gone deeper with the themes of Birdman because it would be interesting what he considers subtle versus beating you over the head.

[@PinoyHyungParkNguyen]

zombii08 He never said that it was "one shot," he said it looked like it was one shot, but with edits, he mentions this twice. Chris may have gone into it a little more, but I don't think the job of a reviewer is to analyze each film, especially films not on a wider release. When did Jeremy say it was subtle?

[@PatrickHoffacker]

Also Rope by Alfred Hitchcock

[@Memel.mp4]

Patrick Hoffacker came here to say that, although i felt the cuts where more obvious and that single cut 20 minutes into de movie almost kill the feeling for me, really great film nevertheless full of suspense especially at the end

[@klausweasley]

Felix Catora The fact that he didn't acknowledge "Rope" (one of the first films to make it seem like it was one long continuous shot) or "Russian Ark" (a film that was actually one long continuous shot) while gushing over "Birdman"'s one-shot cinematography proves that he doesn't know what he's actually talking about. I would excuse him if he was like 14 or something but he's 34, I believe (MY AGE) and he's working as a movie reviewer. He should know his shit by now.

[@JakeG-gp4qt]

Boyhood was my favorite movie from 2014, but I'm perfectly fine with Birdman winning Best Picture. It's incredible.

[@arneshsengupta4636]

Birdman was better tbh, though Boyhood was incredible too.

[@captainjakemerica4579]

Both were amazing

[@dustinsteeves]

there was roughly 58 cuts in this review alone. that's some perspective for ya.

[@007VitaminD]

I dont like these "artistic" commenters who give 10/10 to whatever they subjectively claim is "art" and good.

[@morissmor]

Damn, solid argument

[@HeyItsJoe1]

I liked the movie, but I honestly think Grand Budapest (contender for best film like Birdman) was a far more enjoyable movie, not the "art piece" that people would pick as a topic for discussion but that's just my two cents

[@MarkArandjus]

This film was holy shit good on EVERY LEVEL and it is absolutely awesometacular.

[@KendallManson]

THIS REVIEW HITS THE NAIL ON THE HEAD. EVERYTHING I WANTED TO SAY ABOUT THIS FILM. Birdman is mad rad

[@ARQWELDER]

This movie was DOGSHIT and nothing but hype!

[@stevocon8521]

SPOILERS: I think he actually died when he shot himself and he went into a purgatory like state that tried to show the audience what it would have been like if he was able to see the fruits of all of his hard work. There is a chit ton of symbolism when he was in the hospital room that leads towards this. And there was also a lot of foreshadowing to his death throughout.

[@dexter_vane]

Have you seen "Russian Ark" (2002). I think the movie itself is kind of meh at times, but it's 90minutes actually in one take. The German movie "Victoria" (2015) is over two hours in one take. Not trying to bring down Birdman here, I loved it, but just in case you're interested in actual one-shot movies.

[@TheErnstkare]

making an actual one-shot-movie really limits how much you can do.. which is why Birdman is the best of the three

[@dexter_vane]

TheErnstkare But Birdman is not a one-shot-movie. I agree that it is the best movie of the three, but it's a different category.

[@samus88]

Sure, the "cinematography" was cool, but hardly innovating. Hithcock did it 66 years ago. The acting, sure it's great. But the script, man. Why did they even bother with the hallucinating "powers"? For most of the movie, I though he really did have them. You can tell the same story without confusing people with gimmicky FX. A man losing his mind is the same whether you show him breaking everything on his room by hand or by telekinesis. The scene where he flies, come on, completely unnecessary. And the ending, really? Like he really ended up flying? Nope. Stupid "open" ending as it can get. But the worst part for me is not the whole imaginary powers. It's the supposed character story. I simply didn't get it. He was depressed and then tried to commit suicide. He failed. He still saw Birdman. No developement. What's so amazing for most of you??

[@kevincheng81]

To me this is the most Awesometacular movie in the 2010s. Best of the directing, acting, story and cinematography this decade can offer coupled with innovative camera work and music. I would call it this generation's Citizen Kane if anybody asks, serious.

[@arneshsengupta4636]

I agree completely.

[@ELcinco6dos]

You're lame dude. Birdman is the best film this year. Even if you don't agree with that, it very well deserves Awesometacular. The performances and directing are so powerful, that they vastly outweigh the small negatives. And especially you, someone who reviews movies and "appreciates" the art can see where the script is getting at, and you yourself said you understand from your perspective. This film is gonna be regarded as cinematic gold 20 years from now. You're falling off dude. Tsk tsk tsk.

[@brucewayne3927]

People who hate this movie obviously have no idea what a good movie is.

[@arneshsengupta4636]

Seriously, the comments of the haters is further evidence of their intellectual lack.

[@fedeserra1591]

I think it didnt deserved an oscar. Please, tell me what do you think about the movie.

[@LukeThomasFilmReviews]

I loved this movie, Birdman I thought it was brilliant and amazing!!!

[@DanteKnowsNot]

Jeremy, did you know that this movie was made by one of the "Three Amigos". They are Guillermo del Toro, Alfonso Cuarón and Alejandro Iñárritu. Del Toro had his Pacific Rim last year, Cuarón got an Oscar with Gravity, and now Iñárritu has Birdman kicking ass. Those three are BADASSES

[@arnoldrivas4590]

Loved the fucking shit out of this film! Been Alejandro's fan since his first four films. And a definite refreshing left field turn from his last film Biutiful, a stroll into depression and introspection. Loved it. And he's gonna kill it again in The Revenant. :D

[@arnoldrivas4590]

***** M. Night fumbled the ball too many times. At least Alejandro knows how to work with actors.

[@arnoldrivas4590]

***** Oh right. My bad. Yeah he was great early in his career. Say what about The Village? Was that really when he dropped the ball or was it after in Lady in the Water?

[@arnoldrivas4590]

***** I have to agree. The only good thing about The Village was the soundtrack. Hillary Hahn is a marvel with the violin. But the movie...left me cold. Lady in the Water made no god damn sense to me!

[@pottingsoil]

Watch it once, and forget about it. Birdman review.

[@LuisGutierrez-mx4rr]

He never mentioned Mexicans Directors or Cinematographer Why?? :(

[@andrewfinch76]

Beter lock next time u facking rasict

[@LuisGutierrez-mx4rr]

and_drew_123 I'm mexican and I don't hear that he mentioned mexican directors like Iñarritu or Cuaron for gravity

[@MarkArandjus]

SO someone finally made a cool movie that was all one shot? There have been single-shot films before, but they're mostly experimental. Hitchock tried it with the rope, but the technology just didn't allow such long takes. INTERESTED even more than before.

[@MyTubeIsBetter20]

Always Sunny reference!

[@carlzson299]

This is one of those movies that a lot of people liked but I didn't. If you like it, that's fine. I just didn't. I'll call it... A TOUR DE FORCE!

[@barc0deblankblank]

I didn't know it was all done in "one-shot" and it didn't make an ounce of difference. It was an awfully boring and predictable movie for the most part. I'm certainly not one to snub the theater but this just felt too hipsterish.

[@codefly11]

Hard to take your judgement seriously when you pass off a movie as 'hipsterish'. What does that even mean? What specifically did you not like about the film?

[@barc0deblankblank]

it means that it was self-absorbed, going for a checklist of things that an actor might go through, without making these very things relevant to the average viewer. I didn't take a way a "lesson" from it, to put it lightly, as it it was too busy with trying to prove itself as a film.

[@gunners4hire]

barc0deblankblank Predictable????? My mind is blown, I can't even fathom how you could say that, did you even watch the fkn film

[@barc0deblankblank]

yes. the power of deduction, you might have it too given enough experience and age.

[@bluesorcerer83]

Sadly for you, all your deduction results in fallacies.

[@swaggidyswaggins375]

why the fuck is this not awesometacular? i said the same thing about gone girl, WTF JEREMY

[@matthewlukebrady6958]

He gives bloated Hollywood movies Awesometacular but not Birdman the best movie of 2014? DAMN IT JEREMY!

[@ratmon19]

I felt like the conversations in the movie were nothing special at all felt like a day at work and then you see his disturbing thoughts and testosterones everywhere. Call me stupid or tell me to go watch Transformers I don't care I hated the film no did I see a reason to care about the main character or watching what happened as he continue talking to himself feeling worthless for thinking the Birdman career was a big joke. Is a job get over yourself you should've thought of that before you started playing Birdman if wanted to be taken seriously. And worst part for me is if he hated playing Birdman so much he obviously did it for the money that makes things even worst. Ps worst soundtrack ever.

[@ratmon19]

It so of remind me of Wolf Of Wallstreet. Why watch a whole bunch of douches.

[@maxrowlatt2633]

you gotta be bullshitting

[@fanofgodjimindiva2497]

You're right, you should go watch Transformers and Ninja Turtles. Those are the kind of movies that will surely excite you mind and are adequate for your IQ level. Leave Birdman for people who want to see art in movies and not just mindless popcorn entertainment

[@snowtoastpro665]

I was totally OK (although disagreeing) with what you were saying until you talked about tHE FUCKING SOUND TRACK FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU!?!?!

[@arneshsengupta4636]

You have issues, man.

[@bizzyrealman]

why the fuck did you say? "Fighter of the Batman"

[@arjunroks1000]

That Always Sunny reference at the beginning ahahahhaha

[@Dirvinator]

Just watched this movie, my girlfriend and I believe it is the dumbest, most pretensious, literally pointless, storyless pile of crap 'artsy' film ever

[@bogoatis]

This movie sucked in my opinion.Boring.

[@5carecrow94]

Go back to watching transformers, let the people with brains enjoy this movie.

[@bernie6186]

+5carecrow94 chill -_-

[@bernie6186]

+5carecrow94 I'd rather watch district 9 than transformers honestly d9 is a great fucking movie

[@Rendantoo]

This movie is the best film to come out of 2014. Whiplash is great but birdman did everything slightly better than it.

[@futurestoryteller]

It's weird that people actually call that Goodfellas shot "the opening shot"

[@ekuhn44]

I know, right? It's like a good 20 minutes in

[@GreatSpaceToaster]

Kind of wish Jeremy did more reviews of this limited release stuff. But still, I have no idea how the distribution works, I'm not even American, so it might just be that few of those movies are shown where he lives.

[@dtpiers6136]

Your Its Always Sunny reference game is on point

[@marcusblixenkrone-mller7169]

This movie was absolutely 100% amazing, like.. Holy shit.. The only movie of 2014 that tops it for me is Nightcrawler, but only by a hair. 1. Nightcrawler 2. Birdman 3. X-men: Days of Future Past 4. Captain America: The Winter Soldier 5. Gone Girl 6. Whiplash 7. Guardians of the Galaxy 8. The Imitation Game 9. The Theory of Everthing 10. Godzilla

[@thisisfyne]

It's 2017 people, time to drop the name Bird*man* and be politically correct. You should now say the proper gender-neutral Bird*person*.

[@nathanok7985]

You didn´t say anything bad about it!!!! Why the hell won´t you give it awesometacular. Jeremy, I am a huge fan of yours, but please talk about something else than superheroes all the time. And why do you give movies like "the winter soldier" awesometacular, but you give "on bluray" to great movies like gone girl and Birdman. And dude, I love superheroes, but I would love to hear you talk about Kubrick and Hitchcock, or movies like the Godfather, clockwork orange, 2001 a space odyssey. And could you please PLEASE, make a video in which you show your bluray collection. Dude you´re awesome, but these things would make you my favorite youtuber

[@JohnC546]

I thought this was a Tour De Force

[@kilithecat2546]

exactly

[@benwong8713]

+JohnC546 You can't argue that, but okay.

[@Hello-zi4bj]

I literally almost said 'It's called a Tour De France' and when I realized what I was saying, I face palmed

[@Spike-Prime]

Birdman? Like... like the Hanna-Barbera Superhero Birdman from the 70's? Which eventually resulted in a hilarious and awesome show called Harvey Birdman: Attourney at Law? Well apparently not but this is cool too, I suppose :P

[@MariothePlumber529]

soooo good, love Norton, it's just beautiful, bravo

[@rodrigorodriguez3892]

I really hated this move. It was so boring. And I will give the reasons why. You know how it sucks when comedians say, "for my next joke", well that's how this movie feels. It breaks the illusion of a story, and talks about the hardships of Hollywood to be "artistic" and "real artists", blah blah blah. Most of us are not in the movie business, or not not professional movie critics. We don't care about your problems in Broadway. All I hear is "super thumbs up" from the KZbin movie critics. Well, that's because the movie is FOR THEM, not for the general public. I do get that the movie was "one complete shot", or it tried to be, and all the other bull-crap about the "psychology" in each of the characters. and the ART OF FILM MAKING. Yes, that was all good, but the context in which they all happened was WRONG. I would love to see a movie like this that can relate to the general public, not just people in the movie business. Obviously, the writer of the film was too in touch with his/her own problems, to think of something original. Hated the movie. The HOW was great, the WHAT was totally off.

[@kelvinarnold5458]

From the reviews I've been watching, "Jeremy Jahns Top Ten Best Movies Of 2014" Is going to be a tough one for him. As of right now I still Think that a "Dawn Of The Planets Of The Apes", "X-Men Days Of Future Past", "Captain America The Winter Soldier", "How To Train Your Dragon 2" Are going to be in his top 5 list. I hope Dawn Of The Planets Of The Apes is number 1 cause that movie was Awesomtacular. What do you guys think.

[@Axtmoerder]

what's the point of making a top 10 list when he hasn't seen like half of the top 10 films of 2014? on top of my head he still hasn't seen raid 2, grand budapest or boyhood and i'm sure i'm missing alot more

[@kelvinarnold5458]

Those was probably movies that just wasn't on his radar. Maybe he did maybe he didn't who knows lol

[@ZenHorakti]

I actually think No. 1 is Nightcrawler...

[@kelvinarnold5458]

Now that would be a movie I wouldn't see coming damn what a sneaky entry

[@ZenHorakti]

Kelvin Arnold It's because he say if someone ask him what is amazing movie from 2014. He will remember Nightcrawler. So that's mean how great that movie effect him. I think the reason why Birdman not get awesometacular, because he said "It's Michael Keaton-ish" That mean, he still see Michael Keaton as actor in this movie. But, in Nightcrawler he said "I not see Jake Gyllenhall. I see someone who creep shit out me."

[@BraxtonGaither]

So - In reading the comments... I'm pretty sure your feed is packed full of trolls, bots, and butthurt banana-wielding monkeys! That being said... "Birdman" was a wonderful film. It would be hard not to go into a kind of minor rant about the inner workings of the movie; the well placed some dialog-to-action scenes and the crazy cool one-shot flow it was having throughout the film. It’s a great film, outstanding performances from the cast, wonderful through-line, and radiant score - which is primarily percussion - magic! This film did a few things for me; mad me sad, glad, and excited for all of the same reasons - This is one of the best of the year, but it’ll be thrown to the wayside with regards to the general public... because of that - I’m sad. I’m glad because for the general public will most likely hate it ( like: Rubber ) and I’m excited because this was made - it exists! However all of that aside... the one thing that I took away from this was... Emma Stone killed it! The monologue she belts out directed towards her characters father: solid. I honestly could on and on about it, but I’m not. Because that would be a very TM;DR issue. Nonetheless: I give this a definitely recommend, a blu-ray purchase, and a nearly 10/10.

[@JayNxx]

I feel like the point of a movie is to entertain me not to make me fall asleep in the first 30 min. I don't care how awesome everything else was, the end product needs to keep me awake and interested. But that's just me :P

[@codefly11]

Why didn't you like the film?

[@Pablud3S]

Enjoy Michael Bay

[@AlexTTzer0]

why would u buy this movie on bluray?i wouldnt watch it again even if i was paid....ok 5 euros and more i would

[@GameNationRDF]

The movie is always trying to over-smart the viewer. It is one if those movies that drowns in its own ego. I think the acting was okay, and the one-shot gimmick thing is nothing revolutionary but it is a cool achievement indeed. And birdman costume was pretty cool but other than there is nothing i like about the movie. The plot is weak, again, it is trying too hard to be cool and smart, and the ending was actually bad. Alright, we get it, people are selling theirselves for money thus ruining "true art". But so what? That should't mean that the movie has the right to humiliate people who dont enjoy unconventional art movies. The message of the movie is: if you are not smart enough to understand the plot, than it is art. The directors "i know everything look how smart am i" attitude is irritating and it starts to take over the movie after sometime. I kinda get why people like this. It is diffrent, it is unusual. But to me, i should not have to think so so hard in order to get a little particle of message out of the god damn thing. It is trying to make you leave the movie in hopes of actually understanding the point so that you can tell how smart, artsy and cool of a humanbeing you are. "Because starring in non-lowbudget (indie) movies with visual effects is not art and you have to shoot yourself in the head to get appreciation from the "high class" critiques" Maybe that is the point of the movie. Maybe it is trying to show how horrible these movies can get in the name of "art" by actually reflecting this idea from itself. But i highly doubt so... I dont want to hate this movie but to me it is pointless and a waste of time. It is humiliating / offensive / rude to many, attempts to tell us nothing but the things we already know but fails at it. I think people who think they get what this movie is trying to say are wrong, because there is no message. It is ironic.

[@Binary911]

GameNationRDF I didn't feel it was a pretentious film at all, actually it was so emotionally powerful, and as an artist myself, I can say that is the main point of any piece of art. Yes, it tries to be a lot of things at the same time, but it works, nothing felt unnecesary or out of place or put there just to ''make a point''; everything was connected. The message (at least what I felt was the main message) wasn't insignificant at all, it was about ego, how everyone needs it to feel superior/more important in order to feel validated (some more than others); when in the end we all are pretty much insignificant. I can't understand why you think it was insulting, because it wasn't difficult to understand at all (no, i'm not trying to appear smart) , and personally I loved how it fools you towards the end with those apparent endings. And i'm not trying to impose you my opinion, but I really loved this film, so I want to discuss about it.

[@MedhaavMahesh]

+GameNationRDF hahahahaha, just because you couldnt see the meaning behind the film doesnt mean it is pointless. you are as bad as the guys who say you are too dumb to understand this film

[@GameNationRDF]

Medhaav Mahesh​ no, the fact that i coukdnt see the meaning behind the film makes it pointless, TO ME. I just shared my opinion about a movie I did not like why would this make me a "bad" person?

[@MedhaavMahesh]

GameNationRDF because you just say a clever film is dumb and pointless because you didnt find the meaning. i mean really? do you need everything to be spelled out like interstellar or the matrix, those movies are dumb. oh and our profile pic just answers why you couldnt find the meaning.

[@GameNationRDF]

Medhaav Mahesh I was trying to say that movie is not clever as people think it is. And the fact is, I can find a movie dumb and pointless, what is the big deal about that? I did find the meaning: "yeah bla bla, art movies are dying OMG so many unexpected things wow I am so smart, so many plot twists, superhero movies suck, happiness != success". Really. This is what I get out of that movie. It was trying to dis superhero and high budget CGI driven movies but you cannot validate your argument by completely bashing another. The movie was so desperate for a feel of a story/plot that they made the characters talk about their history and explain things blatantly in very plain language. Again, these are my points, I don't get the fact that these make me a "bad" person as in someone who actually harms others and commits immoral actions.

[@rockinoff21]

Dude, once again you didn't not bother to mention the director. If you are praising the direction, WHY NO TO MENTION THE FREAKING DIRECTOR!?!?

[@johnnatandc]

I actually hated this movie.. Slow and boring... Only for hollywood ppl

[@johnnatandc]

Nah.. I am not talking about that kind of speed. But you hope that the movie keeps its pace. For the first time in my life I felt asleep in a movie theater. I thought that it was about the birdman of the cartoons or something like that. :( . It was my mistake.

[@johnnatandc]

Lol! Sadly I was not like that. It was after a stressful day at the office.

[@brucewayne3927]

This movie ain't for little kiddies

[@observeralternative4769]

Go watch Transformers 7 revenge of ultron.

[@johnnatandc]

Thank you for your recommendation, it has been very helpful.

[@aprildeath1015]

I love Jeremy Hans man, but I truly believed this movie was dogshit.... Just..... Made.....no........sense.....

[@shmeh97]

God dam I hated this movie

[@Caramelflamel]

shmeh97 God "dam" nobody cares.

[@shmeh97]

Bombur The Mighty Dwarf you mad?

[@shmeh97]

***** yeah I guess I was mad at how disappointing this movie was.

[@brucewayne3927]

Said no one ever

[@KerushiTenshi]

I found this film unoriginal, boring and the characters detestable. The camera work only help make the space feel real which I kinda admired. Problem was the story! I've seen my fair share of theatre and even worked a bit behind the curtain. This story has been done to DEATH at lease on stage. It reminded me of a French farce I once saw which had the same story, similar characters, who where WAAAAY more entertaining than anyone in this film and it was FUN to watch. In the end I just didn't see what the message was in this film. I enjoyed this film as much as I did Prometheus, which was NOT AT ALL.

[@ManyDoors777]

This was one of the worst movies I've ever seen....

[@FranQuijas]

Then you have seen a lot of masterpieces!

[@hagridmary]

ManyDoors777 You must be too young to understand that film isn't just about action, it's about soul and morals.

[@ManyDoors777]

Tom Monty Actually I'm so old that I've seen just about everything. I watched the whole movie. It was no good. It deserves nothing.

[@Caramelflamel]

ManyDoors777 Obviously you're in the minority. Go watch some more Fast and the Furious.

[@Caramelflamel]

***** I honestly like some of those. I can appreciate alot of movies and see the potential within them. Including Birdman.. But damn, some people are so shallow that they can't see the true beauty of this movie. They even put a little action in there with the big robot bird for all the mainstream fanboys but i guess that wasn't enough. :P

[@PeterSancianco]

I really wish this had received an Awesometacular: / I would like to see more movies like this produced and the only way that happens is for a whole buttload of people to watch it in theaters and for it to make a buttload of money on a small budget which means the people who produced the movie make a buttload of money and all the other producers are like, "Hey.. those producers made a whole buttload of money with a tiny budget. I wanna make a buttload of money on a tiny budget. Let's invest in more films with great characters and good story structure instead of just buttloads of explosions..." Obviously followed by world peace... I demand a recount! Like this comment if you feel #JeremyJahns should change his review from Buy Birdman on Blu-ray to Awesometacular because Jeremy is awesome and would totally do it if a buttload of his fans felt really strongly about it. And support more movies like Birdmand by watching them in the theaters because it's worth every dollar/popcorn kernel: )

[@soltar7777]

This movie was terrible, seriously, without the whole one shot gimmick, this movie is fucking worthless.

[@BrainDead235]

You couldn't be more wrong.

[@IMmephiles]

Did you even see it?

[@lefred5151]

Gr8 B8 M8

[@IMmephiles]

Mushrambo Supersayan People like you are so scared of not getting a movie you'll label anything that requires any interpretation as "pretentious", as some kind of way to justify to yourself and other eggheads like you why you think only movies that spell everything out for you are good. You even admit it right there, the movie is too deep for you and your dumb little mind is intimidated by it. There are some reasons to dislike this movie, sure, but that's not one of them.

[@MaadLuck]

PREACHHHH!!!!

[@TKoMEaP]

Jeez, some of these comments... So apparently, Jeremy has to give every movie you think is sophisticated and amazing an Awesometacular, and if he gives it anything below (even if it still means the movie is great) then he's obtuse and narrow minded... Yet, if he actually DID give the Awesometacular rating to all of these movies, then the whole value of the rating is pointless, and you'd be yelling at him for going too easy on the movies... I guess you just can't satisfy everyone, although at the end of the day, why does his rating matter? The rating is just the icing on top of the review, but it shouldn't be the only thing you take away from the review, instead of skipping to the end, LISTEN to his opinions on the film. Bit ironic the people calling him narrow minded and obtuse appear to be the same people that only care about a simple score, instead of the meat of the review and his opinion.

[@johnellizz]

This review is from: Birdman (Amazon Instant Video) I'd like to explain what the movie "Birdman" is actually about so that people can understand this great film better. Observe the poster for the film: You'll notice that 'Birdman' is perched upon Michael Keaton's head. This has a specific Occult meaning: The Reptilian alien that possesses humans is called 'Number 6'. Number 6 is often depicted as a head upon a head just as we see in this image. Birdman is actually Number 6 who possesses Michael Keaton in the film. Many humans in our world are possessed in this way. They all function as a global conspiracy called '666'. The reason they are called '666' is because they ALL host Number 6 - who uses them to govern the planet Earth on behalf of The All Seeing Eye. These people are called 'BioDigitals' because they are biological humans with a digital Reptilian alien intelligence inside their minds. The BioDigitals are the actors of our world and the planet is the stage - which is what the film's allegory is about. For example, in one scene, we see the actress Naomi Watts in her dressing room...There is a hand on her dressing table which is making the '666' hand gesture. And in the scene where Michael Keaton is outside in his underwear, we see the All Seeing Eye looming over him to indicate that he is controlled by this god-like entity. We also see the 'Phantom Of The Opera' poster with a mask displayed often in the movie...This refers to the Occult theme of 'The Masquerade' because the BioDigitals consider themselves to be an alien in disguise wearing the mask of a human face. The very word 'Occult' refers to 'The Secret Order Of The Eye' because 'Oc' means 'Occular' and Cult means 'secret order'. When we hear the gravelly voice of Birdman talking in Keaton's head, that's actually the voice of Number 6 - the indwelling Reptilian alien. Number 6 has governed the Earth for a long time - and is the sixth digitized alien Reptilian who has done so. There were five previous ages of human civilization. All were controlled by a 'BioDigital Conspiracy'. The film's allegory is about the final days of the '666' conspiracy - for the All Seeing Eye will eventually replace Number 6 with 'Number 7' - the seventh digital Reptilian to govern the Earth in a new age. To accomplish this, The 'Eye' must first condemn the current human civilization - which is why Number 6 is corrupting Mankind at this time. (As Mankind is corrupted, this provides The 'Eye' with the necessary excuse to bring about 'The End Of Days' apocalypse.) Number 6 (speaking as Birdman) explains his philosophy that life is about mayhem and disaster. "People want blood," claims Number 6. Other movies that contain a subliminal allegory about Number 6 are: "Donnie Darko" and "The Beaver" starring Mel Gibson. In "Darko", for example, 'Frank The Bunny' is Number 6 - and when Donnie asks him: "Why do they call you Frank?" he replies: "It's the name of my father and his father before me." This identifies Frank as '666' because he's the THIRD Frank (F is the sixth letter of the alphabet - so Frank Frank Frank = 666). In "The Beaver" Mel Gibson retrieves a puppet from a dumpster with the number '6' spray painted on it. This beaver puppet takes over his life and directs him to "Blow it up!". (In "Darko", Frank instructs Donnie to "Burn it to the ground". And in "Birdman", Number 6 incites Keaton to go out in a blaze of glory.) The world stage will eventually be cleared for the '777' age of Mankind, and Number 6 will become a 'has been'. The next age will feature humans with forehead implants (sort of like 'The Borg' of Star Trek). These humans will be guided by The All Seeing Eye and will achieve perfect obedience under this mysterious 'god'. (The purpose of Hollywood's relentless barrage of 'One Eye' symbolism to prepare Mankind for this 'god'.) BioDigitals reveal their existence through subliminal shapeshifting of their EYES. All Hollywood actors display these moments of disclosure in every movie they appear in. For a brief instant (and only at a distance from the camera) they make a slit appear in their EYE that extends ABOVE their human eyelid. (This is known as 'The Clown Slit' because it is depicted in many clown make-up designs.) Humans see this at a subconscious level of our minds and (according to the aliens) AGREE to participate in the BioDigital system by consciously ignoring these displays. Interestingly, humans must also AGREE to accept the forehead implants. Many humans will accept the implant as a device that allows the Internet to stream directly into the mind (like telepathic WiFi). All humans who accept the forehead 'Seal' will become 'perfected' servants of The All Seeing Eye.

[@Jbtorresmedina]

Can the Academy just stop the gibber gabbing and hand over the Oscar to Keaton!

[@PatrickWardActor]

Doing a movie in one take isn't really all that hard! Anyone with a camera and editing software can do that, just because a movie finally does it, does not make it revolutionary, i'm not saying it was a bad choice, but don't overhype this movie for being one continuous shot because it's really not all that impressive.

[@colesamoth4353]

I agree that over praising a movie like this for it's one-take aspect, is pretty redundant. But in all fairness, that didn't make the actual film bad, people just need to tone down on the one-shot crap. The dialogue, and great acting (people were working really hard on this) are what immersed me - what made this movie work, not just the "continuous shot". Eh, I'm probably gonna get hate for this anyway...

[@grnarrow7695]

Cole Samoth it's not done in one take tho, which made it all that harder to film, to make it seem like it was done in one shot is incredably hard. everything has to be on point. the character positioning, the hair and makeup, the props and backgrounds, the audio tracking. all that stuff.

[@IMmephiles]

Except it's actually incredibly hard. How could you possibly think it's easy?

[@TheKevlar4]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. The ignorance hahaha. Calling it easy is like saying progressive rock and jazz are easy to play.

[@leobergmiller873]

YOU GAVE HACKSAW RIDGE AN AWESOMETACULAR RATING AND BIRDMAN JUST A "BUY IT ON BLURAY" RATING?!?!? WWWHHHAAATTT!!!!!

[@smart2click]

This movie bored me.

[@Jonathan1003]

I hated this movie

[@Jesses001]

Well this is defiantly not the first continuous shot movie. It is rare though because it is frankly a pain in the ass, ha. I have seen a few movies that were continuous shot movies, one of them was actually no cuts at all, REAL continuous shot. I can not spell the name off hand...foreign film. It was Cyrillic, so I would guess Russian. Any transitions was the main character walking into a new room, but the camera never cut, or even gave a spot where it could cut. They just had the next scene ready and waiting for him to walk in. Must had been a nightmare to film.

[@Caramelflamel]

Wow the people in the comment section saying this movie is horrible are so patheticly mainstream i can't even believe it. I think it's hilarious but yet so sad that all of you can't appreciate the movie the way that you should. Oh well, the movie recieved Oscars. That's more than you'll ever accomplish in your life.

[@leob4403]

+Bombur The Mighty Dwarf Aren't you the hipster wannabe douchebag. well done on your life.

[@Caramelflamel]

Leo B Thanks! ;)