When the opponent is low on time, a knight can be useful for producing tricky positions that can lead to piece blunders or further time trouble
@MrDanielfff77710 ай бұрын
Completely agree
@MarkKaranjaM4K Жыл бұрын
Good job mate. Also I love how he talks...subed!
@Chesschamp20092 жыл бұрын
Thanks for such great and quality content... Truly nice work...
@AkashiSenju-13 ай бұрын
the knight needs an outpost to prevent it from getting trapped
@JavierBonilla782 ай бұрын
Thanks! ♥
@AvishekTravels5 ай бұрын
Bishop definitely better, knights are useful only if you have other main pieces at the end
@jjrruuiizz3844 Жыл бұрын
GREAT DEMONSTRATION. I PERSONALLY PREFER THE KNIGHT MYSELF. ONLY PIECE THAT CAN JUMP OTHERS
@crotolamo12 жыл бұрын
Nice vid!
@kelvinmwamba5382 Жыл бұрын
The Knight is the best. It bows to no one
@tricksofchess8 ай бұрын
For me the bishop is better usually!
@paulson79824 ай бұрын
If u focused on the game the horse will not stop.
@deanfowles37072 жыл бұрын
If there's only one enemy bishop, get all your pieces on the opposite colour square. I think Knights are better
@tricksofchess2 жыл бұрын
Depends on the place of action. If there are pawns on both flanks, the bishop will be better anyway.
@Harikrishna-kt6po Жыл бұрын
Knight 😘 but also bishop 😂
@craigstevens93512 жыл бұрын
bobby fischer is the GOAT
@tricksofchess2 жыл бұрын
I have a series of videos, where I try to analyze how is the GOAT. kzbin.info/www/bejne/sJCqeayboNhoZ5Y
@Blockah Жыл бұрын
The fact two knights can't force checkmate, they are slow, and get in the way of each other, and Chess engines prefer Bishops, I'm afraid to say it but, Bishops are technically better.
@Diddyhottieoilly12227 ай бұрын
Its true i used to dickride knights but bishops are better its just a fact especially when in pairs a single bishop or knight controversial but usually a draw