@@blackpenredpen Do you really think that you do math with this absurd imaginary unit?
@ИванЧимша-Гималайский5 жыл бұрын
+Rahul Can't blame him lol
@gregorystocker9715 жыл бұрын
Сергей Мишин imaginary numbers are used in a ton of real world physics situations. The name makes them seem like someone made them up for no reason, but they are very legitimate.
@@pedroandrade8727 sounds like a MC villager trying to scam you into giving some emerald.
@MrCoffeypaul5 жыл бұрын
That was fast!
@pyglik22965 жыл бұрын
I was genuinely frightened for he NEVER stops in his videos :)
@hamiltonianpathondodecahed52365 жыл бұрын
this question is very easy using the fundamental theorem of engineering *sin x ≈ x* | x in radians | *π ≈ 3* using these we get the answer as 0.05 %error of 4.5%
@Tactix_se3 жыл бұрын
💀💀💀💀
@RealFreshDuke2 жыл бұрын
@@analog_joe No, it's pi = 3.
@ajety2 жыл бұрын
@@analog_joe Dude it's just a joke
@glendenog90952 жыл бұрын
@@ajety Jokes are supposed to be funny. Like how funny it is that the top rated comment is from a bunch of math fanboys who are so divorced from reality that they accept 3 degrees as an input for a special case solution without question even though angles (and all measurements) are analog values in every case with tolerances (aka limits), and instead of contemplating their own limitations are like "engineers are sooo dumb hyuk hyuk". Congrats you have solved sin(3), a contrived impossibly accurate degree reading, which was solved to the n'th digit long ago to actual usable digits, using the most convoluted and inefficient method. I'm not entirely sure who didn't get the "joke" here :)
@odysseasv77342 жыл бұрын
@@glendenog9095 HAHHAAHHAHAHHAAHAHAH WHAT
@DjVortex-w5 жыл бұрын
At 11:05 you can almost hear the cogwheels turning in his head...
@alexharkler5 жыл бұрын
3:03 "Of course, 1 is equal to 2" -BPRP 2019
@anshumanagrawal3463 жыл бұрын
3:03 actually
@not_allen11073 жыл бұрын
1 = 2
@jeremyzamayla26075 жыл бұрын
"1+1+1 =3" We did it boys, an A in maths 👏👏👏
@ffggddss5 жыл бұрын
That's from John Lennon, _The Beatles,_ "Come Together" (Abbey Road) - "One and one and one is three, "Got to be good lookin' cause he's so hard to see, "Come together "Right now, "Over me." Fred
@THE-BIG-JP-REILS5 жыл бұрын
ffggddss I HAD THE SAME EXACT THOUGHT
@colleen94935 жыл бұрын
Math*
@captasticts84195 жыл бұрын
@@colleen9493 both is fine
@kaaiplayspiano72004 жыл бұрын
18-15=3
@bruhmoment18355 жыл бұрын
Bprp: *Runs math channel like a boss* Also bprp: *1=2*
@aravindmuthu953 жыл бұрын
I almost read as "Bprp runs meth" 😂😂
@SyberMath5 ай бұрын
Nice problem! I have 2 comments: 1. 23:52 it's easier to just say "divide the hypotenuse by sqrt(2) to get the leg so it's sqrt(3)/sqrt(2)" 2. 24:44 the second leg should be sqrt(3)/sqrt(2) not sqrt(3)/sqrt(3) 😊
@IoT_5 жыл бұрын
I work as a teacher of control systems which involves a lot of different math subjects. Thank you for showing HOW TO TEACH STUDENTS. I like how you tell in detail mathematics. I really appreciate it.
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Eg. M wow, what a comment! Thank you!!
@kennylim30345 жыл бұрын
Really shows you even an expert has troubled moments
@Roescoe2 жыл бұрын
processing processing, I felt like I was in the moment.
@spinningcycloid64472 жыл бұрын
He teaches very friendly. Even for a simple calculation, he explains very kindly. So I can understand whole topic. Thank you for your works!
@Mihau_desu5 жыл бұрын
"1 is equal to 2" - bprp 2019 Btw. Great video
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Sigma 1 thank you!
@Periiapsis5 жыл бұрын
For sin and cos of 15° couldn't you have also used the difference formula for sin and cosine? sin(45 - 30) = sin(45)cos(30) - cos(45)sin(30) cos(45 - 30) = cos(45)cos(30) + sin(45)sin(30)
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Perihelion Orbit yea. You can also use that picture to prove that formula.
@themcscripter21112 жыл бұрын
I think he was proving the sum and difference formula using complex numbers
@MattMcIrvin2 жыл бұрын
I can never remember those formulas, but I can remember how to derive them with complex numbers. BPRP took a while to do it because he was being very explicit about writing out all the steps. For the 15 degree bit, I figured he was going to bring out complex numbers again to derive the half-angle formulas, which is definitely how I would do it, but he had a cleverer way.
@epikherolol81892 жыл бұрын
@@MattMcIrvin what's there in remembering them, it's not even that hard, for me it's like if it's cos formula then all cos terms together+- sin terms together If it's sin formula then angles exchange
@Zain-nc1ww Жыл бұрын
@@MattMcIrvin The way I was taught to derive the half angle formulas was to first derive cosine's double angle formula, then isolate cos(a), and plug (π/2)-a into the cosine half angle formula to derive the sine half angle formula cos(a+b) = cosacosb - sinasinb cos(a+a) = (cosa)^2 - (sina)^2 cos(2a) = (cosa)^2 - (sina)^2 cos(2a) = 2(cosa)^2-1 (cos(2a)+1)/2 = cosa^2 √((cos(2a)+1)/2) = cosa √((cos(2((π/2)-a)+1)/2) = cos((π/2)-a) √((cos(π-2a)+1)/2) = cos((π/2)-a) √((1-cos(2a))/2) = cos((π/2)-a) √((1-cos(2a))/2) = sin(a) I'm curious how you'd derive it with complex numbers; I've never seen that before
@sharmsma5 жыл бұрын
The result should be almost equal to pi/60. For small angles, sin x approximates x with x in radians. Converting 3 degrees to radians is just multiply with pi/180.
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
sharmsma yup that’s coming up soon
@DavidvanDeijk5 жыл бұрын
(pi/60) - (pi/60) ^ 3 / 6 is a better estimate, expanded the taylor series by one
@easygoing17195 жыл бұрын
I take my pen and ruler, draw a Triangle with one angle of 3 Degrees and an angle of 90 Degrees and then use the Definition of sin. I am a simple man...
@gumanelson20075 жыл бұрын
And then hope your pencil is infinitely sharp and the angle is perfectly 3 and you measure the distance very accurately.
@darkseid8565 жыл бұрын
@@gumanelson2007 never knew that one can make angles using a ruler .
@akunog27085 жыл бұрын
@@darkseid856 It's easy to make relatively precise right triangles using a ruler if you know the length of the legs.. but yeah, since the length of the legs is kind of the goal it's not helpful here hehe. This is probably why ~easygoing~ considers himself a simple man.
@darkseid8565 жыл бұрын
@@akunog2708 yea that was basically what i was saying
@gumanelson20075 жыл бұрын
@@darkseid856 after using a compass or protractor
@patrickmckinley87394 жыл бұрын
Digging through some of my old papers, I found where I ran this calculation years ago . I just ran the half angle formula on 30 degrees to get the sin and cos of 15 degrees. I love your construction to do it geometrically - never seen that before.
@genio25099 күн бұрын
You could also do Sin(45-30)! (Not factorial)
@whyit4875 жыл бұрын
I like how this went back to your old video about special phi triangles! Also, I loved how there's such an elegant way to find an exact sine of an angle! Great job on the video.
@Metalhammer19934 жыл бұрын
Wohoo I'm not the only one deriving the angle sum from Euler's formula! My professor thought me mental xD. Didn't subtract points but asked me if I'm slightly troubled that I find that simpler than geometric proofs xD
@gutschke2 жыл бұрын
"If your only tool is a hammer, ..." And to be honest, Euler's formula does make for a wonderful hammer.
@hussiensayed12445 жыл бұрын
Can we do this without triangels 1]for 18° For this equation sin(X)=cos(4X) X=18° satisfies the eq where 4*18=72=90-18 We know cos(4X)=2cos^2(2X)-1 =2(1-sin^2(x))^2-1 Let y=sinx Then y=1+8y^4-8y^2 8y^4-8y^2-y+1=0 This eq has 4 solutions but one of them is sin18 8y^2(y^2-1)-(y-1)=0 (y-1)(8y^2(y+1)-1)=0 y=1 is a sol but not sin 18 cuz sin90=1 8y^3+8y^2-1=0 8y^3+4y^2+4y^2-1=0 4y^2(2y+1) + (2y-1)(2y+1)=0 (2y+1)(4y^2+2y-1)=0 y=-0.5 is a sol but not sin18 cuz sin 210=-0.5 4y^2+2y-1=0 y=(-2±sqrt(16+4)) /(2*4) =0.25(-1±sqrt(5)) Two solutions but we have one +ve solution and we know sin 18 is +ve Then sin 18° =0.25(-1+sqrt(5)) Cos 18° =sqrt(1-sin^2 (18)) =sqrt(1-(6-2sqrt(5))/16) =sqrt(5-sqrt(5))/2sqrt(2) 2]for 15° Cos 30=2 cos^2(15)-1 Cos15=sqrt((1+sqrt(3)/2)/2) =sqrt(4+2sqrt3)/2sqrt2 =sqrt(3+2sqrt3+1)/2sqrt2 =sqrt((sqrt3)^2+2(sqrt3)+1))/2sqrt2 =sqrt( (sqrt3+1)^2 ) /2sqrt2 =(sqrt3+1)/2sqrt2 Sin15=sqrt(1-cos^2(15)) =sqrt((1-sqrt(3)/2)/2) =sqrt(4-2sqrt3)/2sqrt2 =sqrt(3-2sqrt3+1)/2sqrt2 =sqrt((sqrt3)^2-2(sqrt3)+1))/2sqrt2 =sqrt( (sqrt3-1)^2 ) /2sqrt2 =(sqrt3-1)/2sqrt2 3] finally sin 3°=sin (18°-15°) =sin18°cos15°-cos18°sin 15°
@lambda26932 жыл бұрын
Woah nice sol
@unidentifieduser5346 Жыл бұрын
my brain be like😮💨
@jensonjoseph62964 жыл бұрын
I learnt a lot of special specials for the 1st time, though I knew sin (18) and sin (15) algebraically. Also the proofs of sin (a-b). Thank you, you are a special special teacher : )
@not_vinkami5 жыл бұрын
Great! Let's find the relationship between sin(3°) and sin(15°) and construct the one-fifth angle formula!
@Drk9504 жыл бұрын
Mmm I tried this way and i got a fifth order polynomial. Let A=3°, x=sin A, y=sin (5A), then y=16*(x^5) - 20*(x^3) + 5x. Problem: there Is no Solve formula for 5th order polynomial (Abel's theorem). So, i had to watch the video xD
@eliasmazhukin20092 жыл бұрын
@@Drk950 16x^5 - 20x^3 + 5x = 0 x(16x^4 - 20x^2 + 5) = 0 The root x = 0 is extraneous, ignore that 16x^4 - 20x^2 + 5 = 0 Let w = x^2 16w^2 - 20w + 5 = 0 Which is a quadratic equation :]
@andrew4ig5 жыл бұрын
Me on exams: 11:03
@rafaelv.t14035 жыл бұрын
im the opposite
@alinajib47885 жыл бұрын
@@rafaelv.t1403 but you're gay
@andrew4ig5 жыл бұрын
Rafael V.T ok
@AbhishekKumar-jg7gq3 жыл бұрын
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
@astralchan5 жыл бұрын
11:02 Me during an exam
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Zackary자카리 Me during a video.
@keescanalfp51435 жыл бұрын
@@blackpenredpen, great. I can't but admire that
@astralchan5 жыл бұрын
@@blackpenredpen SENPAI NOTICED ME ~~
@kaaiplayspiano72004 жыл бұрын
@@astralchan is it legal to say Japanese-originated words to a chinese person?
@kaaiplayspiano72004 жыл бұрын
@@keescanalfp5143~ I CAN
@lukebuenafe34905 жыл бұрын
Men you deserve 1million subscribers and you deserved the position of my professor in calculus
@bayanmehr96635 жыл бұрын
Super fun video :) I love how you talk about angles like they are people
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Bayan Mehr hahaha thank you
@ozonejgs28875 жыл бұрын
Tibbes is awesome, glad that you shouted her out. On a similar note, another great video. I've had less time to watch them because of my final high school exams (GCSEs), but I'm excited to binge watch all of them after they finish. I'm sure that after your videos, I'll have no problem getting the top grade in my Maths exam =D
@vandanakhullar5228 Жыл бұрын
I have solved the value of sin(1°) . I have leveraged the information from you about sin(3°) and applied the formula about sin(x/3) exactly as you did with sin(10°)
@ashotdjrbashian9606 Жыл бұрын
Another approach (and this was done about 1000 years ago) is to find the value of sin and cos of 18 degrees. For that you use regular pentagon with side 1. Then by the same difference formula you can find sin12 because 12=72-60. After that just use the half angle formula twice. For people asking about sin of 1 degree, after finding sin of 12 degrees, you use triple angle formula, solve the corresponding cubic equation to find sin4. After that use the half angle formula twice and get sin1 !
@demetriuspsf5 жыл бұрын
Mad props for not cutting the video when solving the problem.
@RobertHorton19756 ай бұрын
Completing that rectangle was lovely. Well done.
@رشاداليامي2 жыл бұрын
The video is old, but it contains valuable skills, and I benefited a lot from it. Thank you very much, Mighty Professor
@gastonsolaril.2375 жыл бұрын
Amazing, my bicolor pen friend... It's amazing how with a "few" roots and triangles, you can express sines and cosines in a closed form. Good work!
@sarthakhingankar9158 Жыл бұрын
I love the silence starting from 11:02 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@rmela45015 жыл бұрын
For cos15 and sin15, couldn't you just use compound formula again...cos(45-30) and sin(45-30)?
@jomama34655 жыл бұрын
@Blackpenredpen
@peterchan60825 жыл бұрын
Ok I get your point, and I also had that in my mind. But then the geometric proof is what gives maths so much fun. Indeed I would expect Mr Chao (aka bprp) to show the geometric proofs for the formulas for compound angles, namely sin(A±B), cos(A±B) and indeed tan(A±B).
@Gold1618035 жыл бұрын
@@peterchan6082 I like to do the geometric derivation of sin(A+B), but that one is all you need. You can use oddness of sine/evenness of cosine, sinA=cos(90-A) and vice versa, and tan=sin/cos to get all the others from there :)
@peterchan60825 жыл бұрын
@@Gold161803 Not quite enough. There are more to be desired. I already have several other geometric proofs of the compound angle formulas (some are simpler and even more beautiful than the one presented here) . . . indeed I've even done one for tan(A±B) from scratch, without the need to resort to sin(A±B)/cos(A±B)
@Gold1618035 жыл бұрын
@@peterchan6082 well yeah, I know there are several lovely proofs of all of them, I'm just saying you can also just derive them all from sine of a sum if you'd rather be boring like me :p
@natealbatros38485 жыл бұрын
Will you do multivariable calc vids ? Or pde?
@useruser4003 жыл бұрын
BPRP typically blasts through complex integral calculus, leaving melted markers and white boards in his path. Viewers lag, struggling to follow his genius. BPRP hits geometry. Brain: “Halt and catch fire.” One of the best KZbin videos ever! Take my “Like,” Sir! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@andresfelipemunoz44174 жыл бұрын
For a long time I looked for a channel like yours and when I found it it was better than I thought, friend you are the best, ahhhhh and by the way I will do the 100 integrals with you, hehe I already finished the derivatives but or my god I do not know how you resist so much standing time the truth I admire you very much
@miniwizard5 жыл бұрын
厉害!But my abacus doesn't have the square root function, so I'm still unable to calculate the exact value.
@juxx9628 Жыл бұрын
oh, just approximate square roots the archimedes way. you know, dividing, squaring and adding some bunch of numbers and taking days to just get 7 decimals of precision.
@diegomullor86055 жыл бұрын
Dude you're so amazing. I really appreciate all of your work. I'm 14 years old and I really like math. I never liked how it's explained on schools, it seemes really basic to me and doesn't give a chance to us math enthusiasts to go further. Thanks to people like you, I get to learn more about my passion, which is math. People often see math as a hard thing which involves tons of numbers, but in reality, thanks to people like you, I realised it's really about cool concepts an ideas. Keep up the good work, bprp, because what you're doing is amazing and for some of us, a lifechanger. Sorry for grammar mistakes, I'm spanish.
@artemetra32625 жыл бұрын
i strongly agree with every single thing you said. i think teachers should make the students *interested* in the subject and show its actual beauty. bprp must be an excellent teacher that i would LOVE to have. P. S. i'm Ukrainian and i thought Europe had better education, but i can't see any difference though... guess we are screwed ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@diegomullor86055 жыл бұрын
@@artemetra3262 Yeah you're right. People won't be interested if you just show formulas without proving them. Math is about concepts and ideas. We all really need to work on fixing education for next generations.
@ningchin84765 жыл бұрын
@@diegomullor8605 That's why I endorse Aops. Check them out at aops.com They've been a life changer for me!
@alessandromarchetti27665 жыл бұрын
By knowing the sin and cosin of 3° we can also get sin and cosin for every angle multiple of three. For example sin(117°) = sin(120°-3°) = sin120°×cos3° - cos120°×sin3°. If you were to use the cubic formula on that equation you got a long time ago for the sin of 10 degrees (8x^3-6x+1=0 ; x=sin10°) we could then do the following: sin(7°) = sin(10°-3°) = sin10°×cos3° - cos10°×sin3° sin(4°) = sin(7°-3°) = sin7°×cos3° - cos7°×sin3° sin(1°) = sin(4°-3°) = sin4°×cos3° - cos4°×sin3° Then using sin^2(θ) + cos^2(θ) = 1 we can get the cosin of 1°. Knowing sin(1°) and cos(1°) we can use sin(α+β) = sinα×cosβ-cosα×sinβ and every other related formula to get the sin and cosin of every angle expressed by an entire amount of degrees.
@MattMcIrvin2 жыл бұрын
I was watching this and wondering if the sine and cosine of any whole number of degrees was algebraic. But I poked around on Wolfram Alpha and realized that of course it is, because e^i*(one degree) = e^i*(pi/180) = (-1)^(1/180), so any sum of degrees can be expressed algebraically in terms of integer roots of -1. (Wikipedia says that defined trig function values of all rational multiples of pi are algebraic, which would incorporate all integer degrees. That is not to say they are *constructible* numbers, but I guess bprp just proved that trig functions of the multiples of 3 degrees are constructible?) (Edit: Yes, he did. Apparently any angle of a*pi/b degrees is constructible if and only if, in simplest form, b is a product of *unique* Fermat primes and a power of 2, and 3 degrees is pi/(3*5*2^2). 1 degree is not since its prime factorization has two 3s in it.)
@bikramjeetdasgupta Жыл бұрын
Another approach can be A=3 5A = 15 sin(3A+2A) = sin(5A) sin3Acos2A + sin2Acos3A = sin(5A) then expand sin3A ...and so on.. put the value .. and find out sinA .. Yeah I know old school and tedious but will save u sanity if solving 100 problems in an assignment.. Btw Great Approach👍
@saharhaimyaccov49775 жыл бұрын
11:03 .. A magical moment of thought .. See how your mind works :) Like it
@leonhardeuler68114 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain to me why he paused
@aldobernaltvbernal87454 жыл бұрын
@@leonhardeuler6811 to think
@simmaksimenko3711 Жыл бұрын
I enjoy watching your channel. Thank you. About 40 years ago I was shown a problem. Calculate the sine of 13 degrees. I haven't seen a good solution yet.
@topilinkala1594 Жыл бұрын
Only one I can remember from top of my head is double angle formula for cosine. Every other one I need I always derive before I use them. It keeps your wits as it is finicky to get all those cosines and sines and what not correct. Helps you keep everthing tidy.
@ferramatis5 жыл бұрын
One of the best video ever upload on KZbin. Thanks you
@gergodenes63605 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: We can only find the exact real-world value of the sine of something if it is a multiple of 3° (or is devided by a power of 2) If you have ever stumbled upon the triple-angle formula, and tried to reverse it, you know that trying to get sin(x) from sin(3x) gives you a third degree equation to solve. If you plug it in the Cardano-formula, you will always get a solution in the complex world, we cannot get a third-angle-formula in the reals, like we have a half-angle-formula. For the people interested: sin(3x)=3*sin(x) - 4*sin^3(x) gives sin(x)^3 - 3/4*sin(x) + 1/4*sin(3x)=0 Plugging it in the Cardano formula for sin(x), and simplifying, we get: sin(x) = 1/2 * [ cbrt( - sin(3x) + i * cos(3x)) + cbrt( - sin(3x) - i * cos(3x))] There will always be a number in the form a+bi under the cuberoot, and trying to plug it into Euler's formula will just give back that sin(x) = sin(x) If anyone knows how you'd get an exact soley real value for sin(1°), for example, please enlighten me.
@nuklearboysymbiote5 жыл бұрын
If what u say is true, we can only bound sin(1°). That means get closer and closer approximations for the range of it, like what Chester did for sin(10°) on his channel
@ciberiada014 жыл бұрын
I don't know if it's only me, but as far as I know sin10° = (17427 − √3·√29·√2149867)/21600 and then I go with sin(10° − 9°) But personally I prefer sin10° = (5/12)²
@bobbyheffley4955 Жыл бұрын
You can use the half-angle formula to obtain values for quarter angles.
@tranminhhieu94925 жыл бұрын
No one: Minecraft Villager: 11:03
5 жыл бұрын
Congrats for gaining 300k subscribers 👏
@shreekantsamdarshi8785 жыл бұрын
I am from India. Your explanation is really awesome. It's very nice. I haven't words for appreciation. Awesome awesome awesome.........................
@Alians01085 жыл бұрын
3:05 "One is equal to two"
@pietergeerkens63244 жыл бұрын
Astronomical Units: c = G = h = π = 1 = 2
@jzanimates23525 жыл бұрын
Congrats on 300K!!!
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
JZ Animates thank you!!!!!
@ghoufranabokhalaf49645 жыл бұрын
Thats really fantastic....you give us passion to learn new things....you've new subscriber from Aleppo, Syria 💐🌸
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear! Thank you!
@trueriver19504 жыл бұрын
Love the way you base this proof on (1) = (2)
@hesamsoftware5 жыл бұрын
Exactly a perfect relation between complax analysis and real number , i love them ❤❤❤❤
@kutuboxbayzan59675 жыл бұрын
[Cos(x)+isin(x)]^n=cos(nx)+isin(nx Find formula cos (nx) For n is integer.
@yaleng45975 жыл бұрын
0.3M subscribers. Congrats!!!
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Yale NG yay thank you!
@moskthinks98015 жыл бұрын
(In funny, annoyed tone) No! Prove it all geometrically! :cat:
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
M. Shebl lol. I actually thought about it and it shouldn’t that bad. I could just do the same procedure when I constructed the 15-75-90 special special right triangle.
@stevesun110015 жыл бұрын
The Euler formula is much harder to prove than trig identities, bro!
@jayapandey25415 жыл бұрын
Also after calculating sin and cos of 45 and 30 why not just subtract? Everyone knows that 5+5+5=15 but I know that 45-30=15.
@SatyaVenugopal5 жыл бұрын
That is kind of what he did. Just... geometrically
@christianalbina62175 жыл бұрын
Are we not able to to 45 degrees divided by 15 degrees or is that not allowed?
@darkseid8565 жыл бұрын
@@christianalbina6217 boi thats not how it works ! (As much as I know it doesn't )
@ashtonsmith17303 жыл бұрын
if you want to do it with algebra you can, he did it with geometry
@joshmcdouglas17203 жыл бұрын
You could do this to find the values of sin15 and cos15 but you would need to use the angle difference identities again
@Mernusify5 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: the 6 trig ratios of ANY multiple of pi/60 (3 degrees), for that multiple between 1 and 30, can be expressed in terms of nested radicals. All the other angles in between require you to take the cube-root of a complex number. An equivalent expression for sin(pi/60) is: (1/8)*[sqrt(10+5*sqrt(3)) - sqrt(2+sqrt(3))-sqrt(2*(2-sqrt(3))*(5+sqrt(5)))] You could probably calculate the cos(2pi/15). Answers (1/4)*sqrt(9-sqrt(5)+sqrt(30+6*sqrt(5)))
@hbarudi10 ай бұрын
Nice of you to prove the angle addition and subtraction trigonometric identities.
@luddelagerstedt64584 жыл бұрын
This pause was very nice, it gave me just enough time to figure it out
@Firefly2563 жыл бұрын
Because we have sin(3), we can use that formula to find sin(6) because of sin(3+3), meaning we can find sin(any multiple of 3)
@sayakdutta37125 жыл бұрын
@blackpenredpen you could have substituted 5θ=90, then breaking 5θ=3θ+2θ we get 2θ=90-3θthen apply sine func. on both side we get sin2θ=cos3θ After some calculation we get... 4(sinθ)^2+2sinθ-1=0 Thus without any geometrical application and scratches 😃you can evaluate the value of sin18... P.S. forgot to mention θ=18 and BTW huge fan of your supreme integrals. Keep Posting such integrals with new techniques!!!
@debdami5 жыл бұрын
At 16:20, there's no need to develop the square. The equation on the left gives x^2=1-x and the red square root becomes sqrt(1-(1-x))=sqrt(x)
@trucid2 Жыл бұрын
You can go even further and get the sin of 1 degree by applying the triple angle formula: sin 3θ = 3 sin θ − 4 sin^3 θ It involves solving a cubic in the form of Ax^3 + Bx + C = 0, but it does have a closed form solution.
@jomariraphaellmangahas199110 ай бұрын
I'm gonna thank you for this video. So glad that I created a graph in desmos that has 120 point unit circle coordinates.
@DirkDanckaert5 жыл бұрын
An alternative method (just a suggestion, but may be somewhat easier). Sine and cosine of 36 deg is as easy as that of 18 deg. Then calculate cos(6 deg) = cos(36 - 30), using the known values for 30 deg angles. Then sin(3 deg) = sqrt ( (1 - cos(6 deg))/2 ).
@vishalmishra30463 жыл бұрын
Please make a video on deriving cos (2π/17) = (-1+√(17)+√(34-√(68)) + √(68+√(2448)-√(2720+√(6284288)))) / 16. This is so hard for anyone to understand. Your video will be a great help !!
@Θρησκόληπτος4 жыл бұрын
i spotted circular reasoning at the proof of the angle sum formula: in order to prove euler's formula you need to know the derivative of sinx, which requires sin(a+b). So you can't use the result to prove the base. If you know any proof of the euler's formula without the derivative of sinx, please inform me
@Θρησκόληπτος4 жыл бұрын
cos(a+b) and sin(a+b) can be proven using the dot and the cross product, respectively
@thisisnotmyrealname6283 жыл бұрын
Correct me if im wrong but... - you used complex numbers for the angle difference formula proof - for that you need euler's formula - for that you need taylor series - for that you need the derivative of sin - and for that you need the angle difference formula for sin Great video btw
@pietergeerkens6324 Жыл бұрын
Noting that (√ 5 - 1) = (√5 + 1 - 2) = 2⋅φ - 2 = 2⋅(φ - 1) = 2⋅√[ φ² - 2φ +1 ] = 2⋅√[ 2 - φ] and √[ 5 + √5 ] = √[ 4 + 2⋅φ ] = √2 ⋅ √[ 2 + φ] your final expression can be reduced to the nice anti-symmetric form [ √[2 - φ] ⋅ (√3 + 1) - √[2 + φ] ⋅ (√3 - 1) ] / 4√2. 😃
@tragediahumana97475 жыл бұрын
There's an easier way to get 15° right triangle: Get the 30° RT, but keep drawing the largest side, if the extra lenght is as long as the hypotenuse is you'r gonna have an isosceles triangle 15° 150° 15°. Guess what, both triangles fused make an 15° 90° (15+60)° RT
@imagineexistance45385 жыл бұрын
Today I learned that i=e^(i*pi/2) i^x=e^(i*pi*x/2) And x^iy= cos(y(log(x)))+i(sin(y(log(x))))
@zuccx995 жыл бұрын
By log do you mean ln?
@imagineexistance45385 жыл бұрын
ZRgaming basic log, the inverse of exp(x) or e^x
@imagineexistance45385 жыл бұрын
ZRgaming oh, I thought you meant what do you mean by log, yes ln,
@NHL172 жыл бұрын
This is evidence that mathematicians really don't mind that long walk for a short drink of water
@nimmira5 жыл бұрын
after watching this ... I'm ready to consume 3 large pizzas (with each slice's tip at 18 degrees wide)
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
nimmira hahaha nice!!
@AsuBeats3 жыл бұрын
6:20 thanks for a new way of proving angle difference. It blew my mind.😀🔥
@xnick_uy5 жыл бұрын
At 16:20 you could also have used that your value for x solves x^2 = 1 - x, and therefore (x/2) ^2 = x^2/4 = (1-x)/4. Then the simplification under the root sign becomes a bit easier and/or faster.
@noahtaul5 жыл бұрын
You tried to sneak in the true proof of the angle addition formula with the boxes, and you thought we wouldn't notice!
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
noahtaul hahahaha yea
@sergioh55155 жыл бұрын
Very nice to use Euler's formula and geometry 💕
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Sergio H yea!!
@edsanville5 жыл бұрын
11:04 - I like my math videos like I like my Jerry Springer videos: Raw and Uncut.
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Edward Sanville I once put “raw footage” in my title but YT demonetized it.
@pianoforte17xx483 жыл бұрын
@@blackpenredpen filthy youtube
@user_27934 жыл бұрын
From the fundamental theorem of engineering, this trivially reduces to π/60 ~= 0.0523
@leonardoventura96413 жыл бұрын
No! From the fundamental theorem of engineering π=3 and = = ~=, so sin(30°)=π/60=3/60=1/20
@andycheng44365 жыл бұрын
now just multiply it by 60 to get sin(180)! so easy!
@rafaelv.t14035 жыл бұрын
It Doesn't Work That Way
@Gold1618035 жыл бұрын
Let's use the Sine of a Sum formula fifty-nine times! Just to make sure!
@ΛεωνίδαςΓκώγκος4 жыл бұрын
@@rafaelv.t1403 it is a joke At least I hope so
@clubstepdj5 жыл бұрын
you can also proof the cosine difference formula too and use sin(45 deg - 30 deg) and cos(45 deg - 30 deg) to find sin(15 deg) and cos(15 deg)
@VibingMath5 жыл бұрын
An elegant way to combine euler formula and trigonometry 👍
@kavyajain_64 Жыл бұрын
Bro you can just use the trigonometric formula to get the value of cos 15⁰ which is Cos(45⁰-30⁰)=cos45⁰×cos30⁰+sin 45⁰ × sin 30⁰
@hallowizer4405 жыл бұрын
It's a lot more work to use Euler's formula to prove the difference formula, because you need the sum formula to prove the sine and cosine derivative, which is needed for the respective Taylor series. Instead, you can just use the fact that sin is an odd function, and cos is an even function, and plug in the values to the sum formulas to prove the difference formulas.
@szerednik.laszlo5 жыл бұрын
I should learn for my exams right now :D Here we go again bois!
@harrisons625 жыл бұрын
Laci yeah mine is next week :(
@jorgeeduardopereztasso61345 жыл бұрын
Nobody: Me after reading the title: WHOT¿ ARE YOU SERIOUUS!?!?!? blackpenredpen: 0:01 #maths4fun
@anshumanagrawal3463 жыл бұрын
Write 0:01 instead 0:00 doesn't work
@rishabhxchoudhary5 жыл бұрын
Why the the equation of line (altogether at infiniy):0x+0y+c=0? Is this even possible?
@sauldibari65982 жыл бұрын
You know it’s serious when he becomes blackpenredpenbluepen
@executorarktanis23234 жыл бұрын
every triangle is special for me
@ДантеАлигьери-з9ю5 жыл бұрын
hey, bprp, how do you like the idea to make a video with analysis of the sinuses from 0 to 45 degrees? Maybe video will be for a few hours, but i think it won't stop you)
@level10intellectual525 жыл бұрын
Trigonometry really flares up my sinuses
@mikrikbe5 жыл бұрын
Хмм, действительно интересная задумка
@blandon935 жыл бұрын
bro i used excel for top and bottom equations. in both of them the right side (with minus) is greater than left side, sinus is negative. calculated in abs answer is 0,042960836 , while real is 0,052359878 .
@taylormanning27092 жыл бұрын
11:30 when you gotta read your own notes because you forgot how genius you used to be
@jensraab2902 Жыл бұрын
I know this is an old video that the Almighty Algorithm just recommended to me so my apologies for the late comment. I guess you won't see this anyway but if you do, I'll say that it was a really cool video. It's not that I was losing sleep over the exact value of sin(3°) but it was fun to see it developed. One comment about that one instant where you "buffered" for a good number of seconds and towards the end of the video you said that maybe you should have prepared better. I'll say: don't. It was really satisfying that even folks with advanced math knowledge don't always see everything right away. So, kudos for not having this edited out! I love your channel!
@WahranRai2 жыл бұрын
sin(alpha) ~ alpha (alpha in radian close to zero)
@رشاداليامي4 жыл бұрын
Very very nice method.. . u are best teacher
@gregorynelson15685 ай бұрын
That's pretty much what I got too, but in a slightly different format. I was hoping that it would simplify more, but I guess not, LOL Although I just used a difference of angles trig identity (45-30) to get sin / cos of 15 degrees, it was nice to see the geometric proof of the special 15-75-90 triangle. I like things with rational denominators... so I expanded my trig table to include 15/75 as well as the n*18 angles along with the basic 0, 30, 45, 60, 60, 90 core angles: Sin or Cos (0,30,45,60,90) = √(0,1,2,3,4)/2 (in appropriate ordering) Sin or Cos (15)or(75) = (√6 ± √ 2)/4 Sin(18,54) or Cos(72,36) = (√5 ∓ 1)/4 Sin(72, 36) or Cos(18,54) = √(10 ± 2√ 5) / 4= √2√(5 ± √5)/4