bow length, ATA standard and noncompliance with super recurves.

archers expectations and super recurves don't fit the happy box ATA have made for the industry. what you expect and what compliance delivers is a substandard product in our view. so here is why!

[@af8f000]

Great as always. Thanks for your insight

[@peterpepper9892]

Earlier today was the first time I've been made aware of super recurves. And I need one!

[@BorderArcheryLTD]

They come in different sizes. Small medium and large. :-) large can be a bit of a culture shock.

[@Michael-pn2ye]

Hey Peter we all need one not want need😊🏹

[@kurtmeister8308]

Great video Sid. You mention near the end of your video to caution length for super recurves with static hooks. Are Border hooks considered static, or do they participate significantly in the flex of the bow. I apologize if youve covered this in another video. Thank you for your material you are posting.

[@BorderArcheryLTD]

Our recurves are considered working recurves

[@edsorens]

So I'm understanding this right... if I want the string angle I get on a more traditional 62" recurve, I would need to order a 64" super recurve? Is this the same across the range of recurve bow lengths?

[@BorderArcheryLTD]

We dont adhere to amo bow lengths. So not with us. But otherwise yes