Brandenburg v. Ohio Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...
Brandenburg v. Ohio | 395 U.S. 444 (1969)
The First Amendment right to freedom of speech encompasses one of America’s most divisive and hotly debated subjects: the advocacy of violence for political purposes. Does the First Amendment protect politically motived incitement to violence? Does it matter if the speaker’s politics are motivated by hate? The United States Supreme Court considered these questions in Brandenburg versus Ohio.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here www.quimbee.com/cases/branden...
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...
Have Questions about this Case?
Submit your questions and get answers from real attorney here: www.quimbee.com/cases/branden...
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our KZbin Channel ► kzbin.info_...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...
Facebook ► / quimbeedotcom
Twitter ► / quimbeedotcom
casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

[@RadDadRob]

This is a really good video and well done. Thank you for taking time to make something educational even if its not going to get a million views.

[@blazerplays4961]

I'm actually pretty sure that you are wrong when it comes to the clear and present danger test. That test was actually made very similar to the brandenburg test but was no longer used for a long time because new laws found the clear and present danger test null and void. The Brandenburg test actually reinstated the test but this time just called the brandenburg test

[@ValidatingUsername]

Most countries have to sort out how to regulate transmission of speech sent to the united states for storage or public or private dissemination from the united states 😂

[@tertiary7]

Land of the free.. my foot.

[@mactastic144]

More free than Russia, China, etc.

[@georgedoolittle7574]

At least we have a Court to specify just what a freedom means. Or "had" one anyways..

[@gabrielperez3619]

2021 2nd impeachment hearing of the 45th President of the United States brought me here after the attempted coup of the US Capitol incited by that very same president.

[@brandonlyon730]

Can we stop calling it a coup? At most it was ill conceived insurrection by a bunch of yahoo’s incited by a desperate sore loser. It can’t ever be a serious coup unless the military was directly involved in the whole situation. If those rioters were being serious in wanting to overthrow and take over the government there was nothing stopping the army from running them over with tanks.

[@tejasra8743]

@@brandonlyon730 you are precisely correct.

[@MrPapageorgio]

The South will rise again.

[@lizicadumitru9683]

Mr. Papageorgio I don't get it?

[@MrPapageorgio]

I'm making fun of The Klah. What's with the question mark? What are you not sure that you didn't get it?

[@lizicadumitru9683]

Mr. Papageorgio I assumed it wasn't a joke so I didn't get why anyone would want the south to rise again. 😶🙄🤣

[@kennedysutton1584]

you are sick

[@MrPapageorgio]

@@kennedysutton1584 I might be sick but at least I use capitalization and punctuation. I did this to get a rise from someone easily triggered. Only took 2 years.