Breaking a Customer's Heart

[@saramichele7366]

JM was outrageous for scolding the defendant for not leaving a message every time. How many messages does he have to leave?! This woman flat out lied saying they didn't answer her calls when he has PROOF that they called every week! Smh

[@kourtneyhabermam5495]

agree! I was sadly disappointed in JM in the case.

[@saramichele7366]

@@kourtneyhabermam5495 Same! Very much so...

[@spacecase8791]

Ridiculous verdict. He called numerous times. He left a 3 minute message. She obviously never called to ask if they had it. The judge treated him so poorly for no reason.

[@Criminal.Lawyer.2024]

@spacecase8791 The lady buys the cabinet, takes off work, and no one shows up or calls her. The cabinet is then delivered several weeks late and then they break the glass. The onus is on the store to make things right. The one 3 minutes phone log might have been to an answering machine that was full. The defendant was acting like he was doing the lady a favor for fixing the broking glass...which is why the judge scolded him.

[@Spankmepink]

He never delivered the item he sold her. Ridiculous that you think that its ok.

[@6time686]

The judge found a reason to render a sympathy verdict. Even she knew the defendant wasn't wrong.

[@Criminal.Lawyer.2024]

@@Spankmepink I once sat on a jury where 5 Latino guys stopped on the side of the freeway at 1am so that one could take a piss. A police officer pulled over to see what was going on. All 5 were out the car when he pulled up. He noticed one guy was tipsy and decided to charge him with a DUI even though they were all out of the car by the time he arrived. The officer told one bad lie after another to support the arrest. Within 5 minutes of jury deliberation eleven (11) jurors voted not to convict. The one holdout was a lady who had just moved from Mississippi. We decided to go around the table and let everyone explain their vote. The first eleven jurors demolished the officer's testimony, as he was a horrible liar and some of what he was claiming was literally impossible. When we got to the one holdout, she had no explanation other than "I don't believe police officers lie". An argument broke out between her and several jurors. In the heat of the moment, the holdout lashed out and said "I don't want the handsome young (white) prosecutor to lose his first case over some drunk Mexicans" I tell you this story because sometimes race and skin color matter when people are assessing a case. In doing so they are willing to ignore the obvious facts.

[@spacecase8791]

@@Spankmepink He tried calling so many times. If the plantiff wanted it so bad, she could of called the shop to ask as well. Phone calls go both ways!

[@thyninja17]

If you call every week but don't leave a message every single time. Doesn't matter. He left a message. One message is enough.

[@aprilpinketon2567]

Yep

[@hellraizer06]

Word. Judge an air head sometime

[@davidperez5089]

What do you expect?!😂​@@hellraizer06

[@NubianP6]

No, it actually isn’t. You’re running a business, you may have to reach out to a customer that you’ve wronged more than once, the “wrong” here being having damaged her purchase. Just as JM said, a lot of older people, and even some younger people, don’t scroll through caller ID looking for missed calls, and some people (both young and old), don’t check voicemails, as evidenced by the messages saying that the voicemail box is full. Hell, half the time, all the person calling wants is to tell you about an extended warranty for your vehicle anyway. 😂 I absolutely believe her when she says that she continuously tried to reach out to them, to no avail.

[@jake_]

@@NubianP6 If people don't look for missed calls AND don't check their messages (which he clearly left) , whose problem is that? Should shop owners start going around door to door in order to talk to their customers because they refuse to pick up the phone and take their messages? The verdict was truly ridiculous.

[@stevedesg]

Sorry, have to disagree 100% with the judge. He has phone records. He submitted 5 pages. He called many times. Maybe he did not leave a message every time but none the less. He did what he had to do. Why is the judge preaching about leaving a message every time. Everyone has caller ID.

[@saramichele7366]

I agree! She was way out of line here

[@KAKE-26]

In Greece it is considered highly irregular practice to leave a voice message after calling with no answer. Leaving a voice message, as it were, is not universal. The call logs should have been enough to judge in favour of the defendant.

[@traceyaz125]

The store did nothing wrong. He left at LEAST one message. She knew he had been calling. She’s definitely high maintenance.

[@KSakamoto]

“How’s she supposed to call you back if you don’t leave a message?” Milians never seen a cell phone 😂

[@asgb752-belgium7]

Many calls come from private numbers, which means no number at all, if you don't leave a message there is no way to know who was the caller. I think you are the one who has never seen a cell phone

[@sweet2sunshine]

Well if you call a business though, they do not check their “missed calls”. No business does that.

[@davidwarner3326]

It's a generational thing. I'm 51 and I see that a friend called so I call back. Mom leaves a message, just the same way she "signs" her FB messages. People the defendant's age don't even talk on the phone, let alone check their VM.

[@saramichele7366]

​@davidwarner3326 My parents are 65 and 66 and they call back after seeing they have a missed call. JM was ridiculous for scolding him like that. The woman lied saying they wouldn't answer her when they called every week.

[@KSakamoto]

@@asgb752-belgium7I’ve never received a private call from a business. They’re in the furniture business, they make money by communicating with customers regarding large purchases. Theres no reason for him to privatize his number. Plus he was confused she hadn’t returned the call, that wouldn’t be the case if he had a private number.

[@kierradrayton3599]

Have to disagree with the judge concerning the message thing lol. If you see a number is constantly calling you, how does that not warrant a sense of urgency to see what's up?? And it shouldn't take multiple messages, one message is sufficient. Good verdict but I don't think she deserved any money.

[@mymobilebuddy4392]

No message. No call back. That is reasonable

[@dodgek5270]

This isn't a personal or friend issue. It's a business. You don't handle clients that way. You leave a msg. They do it when they want to sell something to you. They can do it when they need to pay for something too. Make his staff contact her if he can't be bothered.

[@kierradrayton3599]

@@dodgek5270 he did leave a message.

[@traceyaz125]

@@dodgek5270he left at least one message. One should be enough if she really wanted it.

[@samgardner4667]

Just because she doesn’t check messages, doesn’t mean people shouldn’t z fewer things in this world piss me off more than an unanswered phone call.

[@agento5952]

Boooo!!! I don't think she deserves anything for not answering her phone!! Poor business guy!!

[@dayswithdani7846]

The judge was very rude to the defendant. He brought phone records as evidence that he called her to resolve the issue. The plaintiff should’ve walked away with only the glass; no money. People shouldn’t have to call you multiple times. 1 message is enough and the judge should’ve addressed that.

[@sph1226]

Seemed like she was penalizing him for being a young businessman.

[@celeca7]

I’ve never seen the judge this prejudicial against a litigant. He obviously was calling her and left many messages. The plaintiff straight up lied. Instead of focusing on that, she scolds the defendant for not leaving a message EVERY time, completely ignoring the lies of the plaintiff. Why?

[@dunkinjunkie5868]

Really? How often have you watched this Judge 😂

[@samgardner4667]

I usually ageee with her but on this one she dropped the ball. She says he needs to get with the times and understand that not everyone checks messages. She needs to get with the times as well. He bought that lady a new piece of glass, no questions asked, and took responsibility for breaking the glass and took proper measures to ensure he made her cabinet whole again. He did nothing wrong and for her to talk to him like she did was pretty uncalled for. Not everyone leaves messages all the time. People need to answer the phone.

[@kourtneyhabermam5495]

exactly I almost always agree w JM but she was not on point with this case 😔

[@kyoto32001]

plaintiff is full of it. she is such a liar.

[@simonc2532]

You know when Moaning Milian starts screaming over every answer a litigant tries to give she has decided in her prejudice to try and demonise someone who most likely doesn't deserve it. How many times has she screeched about phone records and proof? Now that's not adequate because it needs to be a message every time he picks up the phone because he should predetermine older people like me are idiots and can't return a call ever.

[@isaaxjimenez7028]

IM SO GLAD SOMEONE ELSE SEE’S WHAT I SEE! IM SO IMPRESSED WITH YOUR COMMENT AND SEEING THE TRUTH 👏🏽 IVE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR A LONG TIME FRIEND!!!!

[@amo665]

In my opinion it is because he is Jewish. From the episodes I watched, every time there is a Jewish plaintiff or defendant, she makes a mockery of them

[@MrCharlesEldredge]

She took an immediate dislike to the defendant. She then allowed her bias to affect her ruling. She's often sexist. She has a real problem with men. I've seen it often.

[@kierradrayton3599]

She certainly seems to have a bias towards older people.

[@lukerinderknecht2982]

The judge is right. This guy could have at least send a telegram, smoke signals, or even a carrier pigeon.

[@dunkinjunkie5868]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@arianefr78]

He had a call log of 5 pages and many were 1 minute calls, that means he was leaving a message, otherwise it would be only seconds. Yet the judge gives him a hard time about calling and leaving a message. Why didn't she shout at the old lady and say, why didn't you call him back or go round to the shop and find out what is going on?...

[@IamRexxSeven]

If the one minute calls are 1 minute even that could be another story. Because some calling services round to each minute without any seconds. And at the same time some of them even count the ringing time as part of a call.

[@KayB-l5h]

She knew them folks were calling her. She seems hard to deal with and he seems cocky but not shady.

[@dodgek5270]

That doesn't make sense. She has everything to lose with avoiding them. What does she gain?

[@LivingforJesusaGodisGood74]

Well even the defendant said she wasn't hard to deal with and she was well behaved in court, there's no reason to suggest that she's that kind of person. I wouldn't want to deal with a company that screwed me over first.

[@LivingforJesusaGodisGood74]

But your prejudice is showing.

[@ShondaD_]

The judge is right. I mean it’s to many scammy calls nowadays, if you don’t leave a message to let me know who you are, I’m not answering.

[@kristhemermaid3169]

Come on Judge, you always wants prove and he gave you one. But suddenly is not enough?

[@amo665]

Because, in my opinion, he is Jewish. I know it sounds ridiculous to say that, but every episode I watched that included Jewish person, whether plaintiff or defendant, they get mistreated in one way or another.

[@shellwilliams6306]

Ive heard JM STATE ONE call is ENOUGH in several other cases....WHY is this case different?

[@dunkinjunkie5868]

That's a great question ⁉

[@rockobill7637]

Way back, the judge met a Greek young man while on a student trip overseas, she fell head over heels but he spurned her and she never heard back from him, now stuck with her light in the loafers husband, it all came rushing back with a vengeance at the sight of this young man

[@jake_]

Most incomprehensible ruling ever. She even told the plaintiff "you don't trust him to install it, right?", simply because she had no standing to force the defendant to pay a single dollar otherwise. Ridiculous.

[@curiousnarwhal]

One message is enough. If she isn't competent enough to return a phone call, that's her problem.

[@sevendollarshoes54]

“The guy was super smart bringing phone logs…in a court of law evidence is king.” He brought phone logs that he tried contacting her…he than said he left multiple VMs just not all the time. One VM …maybe 2 VMs should have been enough for the plaintiff to call back and set up a time. After the judge confirmed the phone number …she than said I don’t know who he is calling meaning she was purposefully not answering the calls. Oh where are her phone logs…I’m sure there wouldn’t be any outgoing calls to the business.

[@southerngurlit]

“All I want is a piece of glass”😂😂😂😂 Harvey pllllzzzzz

[@raquelb731]

😂😂😂

[@thefonzkiss]

Judge is out of line here. If he’s calling every day of course he’s not going to leave a message every single time.

[@CarrieRay]

Is it my imagination, or is this channel reposting the same cases?🧐

[@adventuresconjuan]

Haha it’s that old lady’s fault he did leave a message… when you know the number of the business , I would call them back… he did call and leave one message…. doesn’t matter if your old or not …

[@deku7522]

I don't get why she got so mad about the no message calls- if I'm waiting on a service or product and a number I'm not used to keeps calling me then I'm going to call them back to see if it's the business I am waiting on hearing back from

[@snowboy82]

The defendant was on something. He seemed sluggish when he talked.

[@JacobConkin]

I do panic and call back if I get a missed call haha (unless it's just a phone number that shows up. I only call back if they have caller ID)

[@mikieanthony777]

Is that a full size piano or a keyboard? 🎹 Very good sound

[@bbtae4177]

Why are yall reuploading?

[@aprilpinketon2567]

They do this a lot. It’s annoying, bc there’s what?… 20 yrs of cases.

[@IamRexxSeven]

They have been doing this (reuploading) for the last 20 years. They'll take the same case and upload it four times with four different titles. Then they'll take the same exact title and reuse it on four different cases. You do the math.

[@Mary_Lee2395]

This judge need to chill the F down and went way too far with scolding the defendant. The plaintiff is in the wrong for this case. Defendant mentioned he left a few voicemails and has proof he called multiple occasions! How many times does he have to leave a voicemail?! It’s the plaintiffs own fault! Plus she has their number she can call back but nope, she kept waiting for everyone else to do the work but her. This judge needs a cork in her mouth sometimes. She be going off on people for no good reasons.

[@lynzstark]

UGH. . . . in the words of JM "What did he do wrong?" He called and called. He was supposed to waste gas and hours driving over there in hopes that she'd be home and available to have men come in and install the glass? I'm sorry but he called EVERY week for weeks??? She should have been handed the glass and that's all. And to me, that's generous.

[@toshadell]

This verdict has me considering no longer watching The People's Court. Judge acknowledged that the defendant called every day for months. He loses because he didn't leave a message every time?? Ridiculous.

[@dmidgley2277]

Judge is getting senile what else could the guy have done.

[@artinaallen4065]

I yhink it's yime for JM to retire if she hasn't already... she's becoming senile.

[@keithjoseph7433]

This judge just wants to yell at him. First it was he didn't call but then has records to show it and one of them is definitely a voice mail and still want to yell at him. She needs to get herself under control. She does this all the time, yells st someone only to learn shes wrong and then try some other issue.

[@layal3018]

she shouldn't have got a dime and the law doesn't change coz she's older and doesn't answer million calls and a msg, she obviously had an interior motive

[@crackerjacks6789]

Mrs. Pauline is looking absolutely fabulous in her outfit those glasses are fierce.. this is how a classy lady dresses 😅

[@jaynehogue2459]

Shut up he is answering your question

[@FitzgeraldCharles]

I hate it when she does that and she does it so often. She asks a question and when the people try to answer, she then cuts them off. It annoys the hell out of me

[@elainevankat5353]

@@FitzgeraldCharlesYup! She does it all the time!

[@TopherGrant]

Ugh. Another crybaby 😢😢😢😢 Adrian Jr

[@dabrutte]

After the 1st 2 messages… I’m not leaving a message anymore…

[@lillianwilliams5510]

If the defendant had just sent someone there with the glass and no one was home, it would have been a waste of time. As much as I am happy she got money to put the glass in.she didn't call him back. That makes me wonder about her motive I would have liked Judge to ask for a follow-up to see if the plantif actually had the glass installed. Movers and delivery people break a lot.

[@shellmac1383]

The lady should have known the business number.

[@stacybstacyb]

If he left even one message that’s good enough.

[@lindseyyoung9149]

The judge is absolutely horrendous in this one! No way this litigant pissed her off THIS badly. She's obviously taking out her terrible day or whatever on him. He tried to do the right thing which is more than can be said for most people on this show. I blame the lady for this situation. Ridiculous!

[@saramichele7366]

I agree. Very disappointed in JM for this one. She treated him like garbage for no reason.

[@lillianwilliams5510]

The defendant is so arrogant.

[@kutepookie]

My way is this if it’s important they will leave a message and calls will be return. Otherwise no return calls for miss calls…

[@JakeS-n9n]

I work at a place where we call customers all the time an if I do leave a message they never listen to it and just call back cause they seen a missed call. So in that I feel she is wrong

[@LeviAaronx]

At least Harvey gave the defendant some credit 🤷‍♂️

[@BrittBritt__]

These comments are pretty much ridiculous.. The plaintiff called multiple times where NO ONE answered the calls regarding delivery but yet as soon as a lawsuit is rendered - The glass appears -- Good Verdict!

[@MOAB-UT]

Judge got it wrong. Lady is being difficult. Most shops will gladly replace a piece of glass- it's routine. This nonsense is far more hassle then the former. He had call logs. He should have simply said, YES- I left message most of the time. He is not a good communicator. Clearly he did call her and left a 3 minute message. Judge should have given her the glass and the option of having them install it or do it yourself. He should not have to pay.

[@ericmatthews9076]

One message is more than enough. If you see a number calling you almost every day and you don't answer or call back that's your fault

[@k0chana6]

I neber answer phone calls, too many scam callers these days. If someone wants me to call them back, they'll leave a damn voicemail. Everyone is harping on her for not returning calls, but why are they not answering hers in the first place, as a BUSINESS?

[@traceyaz125]

We only have her word that she called and called. He had phone records that he called and called. And yet, he gets burned. Doesn’t seem right.

[@skeetsneufeld6305]

He handed the judge 5 PAGES of proof that he called her back but she ignored that. What was he supposed to do? set up a tent on her doorstep until she took notice?!? He did everything that a business is required to do and then some!!!! The judge is completely wrong on this one!!!!

[@DarkHeartsKing]

The judge was in the wrong here, she saw the call logs and the 5 minute voicemail he left…Soo he called 2 times and left a voicemail 1 times? So what…she’s not answering his calls. She shouldn’t have gotten any money and she should have been scolded. He showed proof of calling numerous times and when the purchase of the glass was made.

[@WaltT-q4n]

Stupid decision by the judge. Plaintiff should have gotten nothing. Saying she is a judge is laughable.

[@JeffCoHale99]

I don’t get. What did they do wrong? They obviously made many attempts to contact her. The judge understands her not wanting to work with them anymore. Why? What did they do wrong??

[@ThatGuy0311]

So pretty much a verdict based on “she’s to old to know how to use technology” so you didn’t spoon feed it to her so your in the wrong. All the other videos I seen she ask for evidence to show you made an effort to contact. That in which he did. But bc of the age of the female she then started crying about leaving a message on every single phone call that in which is not needed in today’s world in reality. Old people gotta stick together I guess

[@bridgote]

I couldn't even finish watching this one. I love Judge Milian, but I absolutely disagree with her yelling at the defendant. He did absolutely everything he could to get a hold of that lady.

[@skmwiki]

The old lady was definitely acting like an entitled jerk. She sounds like a nightmare to be around. I'm sorry for her family

[@sidwalters7233]

Bad salesman, ppl should never do business with this young buck. One is dad no longer running the business this business will fade away because of his attitude. I same sure his parents know this and sell the business.

[@talexander2302]

As a business owner you probably should leave a message....if it's personal Im not leaving a message

[@eisbeinGermany]

why are thye repeating all of these cases

[@DJMookieJukebox]

“Why did she have to sue you for you to pay attention?” ❤❤❤❤ It

[@gooberbeans7972]

Do not agree with JM on this at all. The plaintiff said she was calling him. He had proof he was calling her every week so how did the woman, regardless of her age not see he was calling?

[@zombie5017]

If I need to call family and it is important i will just text since it is faster to get the question asked rather than call wait leave a message then get a missed call because i was busy at work or sleeping.

[@sneakerfreak2002]

Why would you take a day off work & lose several hundred dollars just to receive a lousy piece of furniture??

[@Mollypopithelen]

Ridiculous judgement, sorry JM I hope this was just an off day.

[@carolynrose4525]

Sorry judge got this one wrong!!! She knew he called!! She is trouble!!

[@sammhammiam]

I can see why this show was cancelled. The judge hasn't been the most fair with her ruling.

[@captgaming2134]

Don’t matter the caller ID is there, the person is obviously calling for a reason, just call the person back.

[@cdecola]

Judge M is so irate over him calling every week but not leaving a message is really frightening. Not everyone leaves messages. And if you're repeatedly getting a call from the same number every week, then maybe you should call it back. Plaintiff got her glass, she shouldn't have even received an extra $150 for installation. Plaintiff is entitled. Judge ruled wrong here. Bias for the plaintiff and hostile towards the young man. I think Judge Milian should be reevaluated for her ethics. 🤷‍♀️

[@LivingforJesusaGodisGood74]

Well, this is what he gets for screwing over the plaintiff first 🤷‍♀️.

[@kimberlydent2334]

She shouldn’t have gotten nothing but the glass, because he called so many times

[@shellwilliams6306]

Bad judgement. Completely prejudicial 🙄

[@wdwnutjm]

not everyone has caller ID - hope that kid learned a lesson about business

[@kycutecool5891]

Reupload reupload reupload

[@Neenaross214]

I’m 43. Don’t leave me a message 😂 I hate voicemails.

[@robenrox]

I'm 53 and same.

[@JacobConkin]

Then why do you even have a phone?

[@LeviAaronx]

@@JacobConkinlol phones are for other things than voice memos lol.

[@robenrox]

Mostly texting and making calls@@JacobConkin

[@6time686]

The judge really took issue with the defendant doing his due diligence by calling 100 times? Harvey totally contradicted her at the end with his summary.

[@slmel7]

Defendant did NOTHING wrong, and the fake "judge" was still yelling at him. She's the absolute worst. They shouldn't have to pay a penny bc they did EVERYTHING they were supposed to! The plaintiff is the one that wouldn't answer her phone or return their calls, SHE should have to pay out of pocket! BS Ruling!

[@skeetsneufeld6305]

I completely agree with you!!!

[@raquelb731]

Wait!?! All I want is a piece of???? 😂😂 what?

[@ElsaFriost]

The defendant hasn't even opened his mouth and I can tell you that he is very arrogant and that is not going to work in his favor

[@cynthiagreske5957]

I had ordered some thing on the telephone and the company kept saying we called you 20 times and finally he drove over to my house and he said why don’t you answer your phone and call me back and I said well what number are you calling because I would’ve had it on my voicemail if he had called. It turned out that they were calling the wrong number so yes they did call 20 times, but they called the wrong number so I was not ever notified and because I was not notified and I didn’t call back. They took me off their contact list and I had to reschedule for the product Which is finally coming next week. It’s a good thing that I am a patient person because I was really upset like what do you mean you took me off your contact list anyway it’s all gonna turn out OK but it’s only because of the perseverance on my side and the perseverance on their side that is coming together. So I understand the frustration. This lady has been experiencing since October.

[@jenn_x.]

...except that, in her case they HAD the right number, and even took in the phone records to back up the fact that they had called numerous times and left messages!

[@bryanhenderson9637]

I wonder if People's Court will pay to ship the glass back to her home or if she is responsible for getting it home.

[@IamRexxSeven]

They have to carry the glass home themselves so they can risk breaking it and then they'll have nothing to complain about.

[@BIGROHAN28]

I bet he inherited his daddy's company

[@Criminal.Lawyer.2024]

The defendant comes off as spoiled and lazy. He's taking over his father's business so he doesn't understand the importance of building and maintaining a "good" reputation and providing excellent customer service. He broke the glass and is acting like he's doing her a favor in fixing it. The onus is on the store, not the person out of their money with a broken cabinet.

[@skeetsneufeld6305]

So the fact that he tried to call her MULTIPLE times to arrange to install the glass but she refused to answer the phone or return his calls is HIS fault!?! The poor guy had 5 PAGES of proof that he tried to call her to make those arrangements with her!!!! He runs a BUSINESS for goodness sake!!! He is not obligated to leave his business for days on end to camp out on her doorstep until she could find the time to let him in to fix the stupid cabinet!!! It just does not work that way and Loud Mouth Marilyn knows that very well too. If she was as smart and well versed in the legal world she would also know that it does not matter whether she likes the Defendant or not is irrelevant, the ruling has to be fair. The woman with the cabinet was simply pulling a scam. That was abundantly clear. She paid for the cabinet with a credit card because she clearly said she didn’t have the cash and now she did not want to pay for it which is why she wanted that huge wad of cash for loss of wages and other silly little pennies. Judge LMM is ABSOLUTELY wrong on this ruling, like she often is, but this one she is absolutely, unquestionably DEAD WRONG!!!! She should admit it and I call on her to apologize to the Defendant!!!

[@sailorminaa]

Thank you!! I feel like I’m the only one who is thinking like this. JM solely charged the defendant with an installation service, which is probably what he would’ve paid some techs to fix it. He’s not losing out on much, but this all could have been remedied had he been more proactive and professional.

[@JohnAlexanderramboparyjrthe3rd]

This guy did the same thing to her last season !

[@lukerinderknecht2982]

LoL

[@nishae7436]

The judge was being rude

[@dunkinjunkie5868]

She has my caller ID 😂

[@namegame-b9f]

She trippin this case

[@tamekadavis6641]

I love the people's court.❤

[@MikeNelli-uq2wl]

f

[@feliciagallo9832]

I don't agree with this ruling. Maybe there's was more that the judge read in court papers, but it's not like the defendant ignored the plaintiff. I agree with Milian that everything isn't urgent regarding call backs, but in this case the plaintiff should have called if she allegedly she didn't hear from him.

[@nunya8010]

Yeah old people can't be expected to call people back after you call multiple times and leave a message!!!!!!! REALLY!!!!! THAT'S NOT ENOUGH YOU NEED TO LEAVE A MESSAGE EVERYTIME! HE DID NOTHING WRONG BUT THE JUDGE YELLS AT HIM FOR WHAT? HE DIDN'T LEAVE MULTIPLE MESSAGES AND THAT MAKES HIM GUILTY? THEN SHE YELLS AT HIM WHILE NOT ACKNOWLEDGING HIS MESSAGE BUT BITCHING BECAUSE HE SHOULD NOT EXPECT OLD PEOPLE TO CALL YOU BACK?WTF!

[@mortalKombat-m9h]

These reality shows crack me up is everything real or just super fake😂😂😂😂😂😂 the guy talking when the people come in he’s probably with TMZ the people that love spreading rumors about celebrities

[@MichaelJones-yx4zv]

I can see a lot of young people in the comments. Older people still use phones with cords and many of them rely on voicemails for missed calls. Simple solution is to send a certified letter. I understand y'all not professional or business people so y'all don't understand whose responsibility it is after a business break sometime and admit fault

[@MsJleeH]

He has some nerve acting arrogant. If he really didn't want to come to court he should have tried other means of contact. But he already had her money so he didn't have the incentive

[@ElsaFriost]

The problem is not his product as he's freaking attitude!!!!

[@aprilpinketon2567]

I’d have an attitude too, if I had evidence to the contrary and someone is calling me a liar. Then the judges is yelling at me bc I left a voicemail every other call. He called her more than he needed to. He’s running a business. He doesn’t have the time to sit and call her all day everyday until she answers. The plaintiff seems difficult to work with. She should have only gotten her glass. If she didn’t want to finish the work with them that her prerogative, but it shouldn’t have cost this young man.

[@skeetsneufeld6305]

His ATTITUDE!?!? His ATTITUDE was simply frustration because the fake “judge” would ask him questions and then would not let him talk and then she’d yell at him!!! I would be frustrated too!!! Your freaking attitude is the problem here

[@amandamatheny3675]

I love the lecture she gave him about leaving a message. In addition, we can't assume that everyone has caller ID or that everyone has digital voicemail. I work in recruiting, and while back ago I called a candidate regarding one of their assessments and was leaving a message and they picked up in the middle of the message And it turned out they had one of the old-fashioned answering machines from the 90s where you could answer the phone while someone was leaving a message. The person waited for it to go to the answering machine to find out who it was and I remember doing that back in the day. When I was a teenager, I didn't answer the phone unless I either knew it was a friend of mine calling or I heard who it was on the answering machine and it was for me, because often it would be someone for my parents and if they weren't home I just left a message on the answering machine for them to respond to when they could. as crazy as it sounds in this day and age, some people still do that.

[@skeetsneufeld6305]

This judge has told us all that she is a person who has lost her mind. She is totally dismissing her own rules that she regularly HOLLERS across the room. She is WRONG and even the interviewer in the hall knew she’s wrong!!! This is the last straw for me. I am no longer watching this fake show with a fake “judge”. She is so full of it.

[@samgardner4667]

Literally every phone has caller ID now. It was required that way to combat robocalls and telemarketers

[@82windows82]

Domatov, classic Italian surname.