Bret Stephens | Full Conversation

[@jussimatikainen4681]

I have watched a lot of your programs. These new and old ones back in the 90's. The best interview program ever. Thank you so much for a amazing moments with amazing people. You are a legend Charlie. Creetings from Finland :)

[@suvivares]

Finally, a reporter from the NYT with common sense and doing a realistic analysis of the elections and both candidates. This is an excellent interview. Thank you, Charlie! We hope you will be back soon.

[@craigb4913]

Agree, the number of writers that are credible at all at the NYT is miniscule.

[@nayon9379]

✅️THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the Salvation of the last day that Christ brought in the second and last incarnation of the His new and holy name" (Behavior that cannot fully obey Me is betrayal. Behavior that cannot be loyal to Me is betrayal. Having many understandings and spreading them everywhere is betrayal. The inability to affirm My testimonies and interests is betrayal. These are all acts of betrayal that you have always been able to do, and they are common to you as well. None of you may think this is a problem, but I don't think so. You think that some act of treachery is only an occasional occurrence, not your characteristic behavior, and should not be discussed so seriously, in a way that damages your pride. To think like this is to be an example and example of rebellion. Man's nature is his life; it was a principle on which he depended to stay alive, and he could not change it. This is also the nature of betrayal---if you can do something to betray a relative or friend, it proves that it is part of your life and you were born with this nature. For example, if a person enjoys stealing from others, this "joy of stealing" is part of their life, although they may steal sometimes and not steal sometimes. Whether they steal or not, it cannot prove that their stealing is just a form of behavior. Rather, it proves that their thieving is a part of their life--that is, their nature. This is why I say that the source of this thought is not something that just breaks out from time to time, but is in this person's own nature.) Almighty God said BEHAVIOR that CANNOT FULLY OBEY Me is BETRAYAL. BEHAVIOR that CANNOT be FAITHFUL to Me is BETRAYAL. CHEATING on Me and USING LIES to DECEIVE Me is BETRAYAL. HAVING MANY UNDERSTANDINGS and SPREADING them EVERYWHERE is TREASON. The INABILITY to AFFIRM My TESTIMONIES and INTERESTS is BETRAYAL. OFFERING FALSE SMILES when the HEART is FAR from Me is BETRAYAL. These are ALL ACTS of BETRAYAL that YOU have ALWAYS been ABLE to DO, and they are COMMON to you as well. ☀️🙏 NONE of YOU may THINK this is a PROBLEM, BUT I DON'T THINK SO. I CANNOT TREAT SOMEONE'S BETRAYAL of Me as a SMALL MATTER, and I ESPECIALLY cannot ignore it. 🛑 Now, when I work among you, you act in this way---if the day comes when no one is there to watch over you, will you not be like bandits who have declared themselves kings? When that happens and you cause a major disaster, who will be there to fix the problem? You THINK that some ACT of TREACHERY is ONLY an OCCASIONAL OCCURRENCE, NOT your CHARACTERISTIC BEHAVIOR, and should NOT be DISCUSSED so SERIOUSLY, in a way that DAMAGES your PRIDE. If you really think like this, you lack common sense. To think like this is to be an example and example of rebellion. MAN'S NATURE is his LIFE; it is a PRINCIPLE on which he DEPENDS to STAY ALIVE, and he CANNOT CHANGE it. THIS is ALSO the NATURE of BETRAYAL--if YOU CAN DO SOMETHING to BETRAY a RELATIVE or FRIEND, it PROVES that it is a PART of your LIFE and you were BORN with THIS NATURE. 🛑 😪 THIS is SOMETHING that CANNOT be DENIED to ANYONE. For EXAMPLE, if a PERSON ENJOYS STEALING from OTHERS, this "pleasure to steal" is PART of THEIR LIFE, although they may steal sometimes and not steal sometimes. WHETHER they STEAL or NOT, it CANNOT PROVE that their STEALING is JUST a FORM of BEHAVIOR. Rather, it PROVES that their THIEVING is a PART of THEIR LIFE--that is, their NATURE. 🛑 Some people will ask: Since this is their nature, then why, when they see beautiful things, don't they sometimes steal them? The answer is very simple. There are many reasons why they don't steal. They may not steal something because it is too big to snatch from watchful eyes, or because there is no suitable time to act, or something is too expensive, too closely guarded, or maybe they are not particularly interested here, or notthey see how it will be of use to them, and so on. All of these reasons are possible. But anyway, whether they steal something or not, it cannot prove that this thought only exists as a fleeting and fleeting moment. On the contrary, it is a part of their nature that is difficult to change for the better. Such a person is not satisfied with stealing only once; such attitudes to claim other people's possessions as their own are formed whenever they encounter something beautiful, or a suitable situation. ☀️ This is the REASON WHY I SAY that the SOURCE of this THOUGHT is NOT a THING that just CUT off SOMETIMES, but is in this PERSON'S own NATURE. 🙏 From The WORD, Vol. I. The Manifestation and Work of God. A Very Serious Problem: Infidelity 1 📩 All who have "ears to listen" are led to what the Spirit of God is saying in His lowered and built kingdom/Church engraved with His new name, His totality, the ownership of this disposition, "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD "💐 fulfillment from what was said He to Peter 2,000 years ago recorded in (Matthew 16:18-19). His Coming is the fulfillment of all that was prophesied in the great book of Revelation, so the last "Salvation" He brought the whole truth, the way for eternal life. So the "victorious" ones who will receive them are the wise "virgins" because as recorded in the prophecy of His return no one knows it except the one who will receive it! So "come" and come to His kingdom/church standing in the holy place in the air/KZbin! This is also a fulfillment from the book of (Isaiah 2:2/9:6) which He first fulfilled in His first incarnation. 📥 "They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." 💌

[@marywood4913]

God bless you Charlie Rose! Please keep up your interviews. There is no one who is as skillful as you in this. Thank you.

[@CrapKerouac]

I miss the old show.

[@erubielgonzalez5354]

Oh yes the good old days

[@GabrielGonzalez-cm4gi]

Hey Charlie, please lose that fake iconic black background, it’s making you look like an AI generated phantom. It’s a disturbing look and quite distracting in a Max Headroom kind of way

[@jps0117]

I'm glad someone said this.

[@auggie87]

Its so distracting. Just show the background of the room you're in. No one cares.

[@teevee23]

AI generated phantom jump-scare

[@robertpaterson3229]

It's good you said something - but we got to give the guy credit. He's 82 - most people his age can't use a cell phone.

[@jackkinstlinger7304]

I found this video to be extremely stimulating and valuable. Kudos to both Charlie and Bret.

[@creativenature2940]

Dear Charlie, thank you for keeping us informed. You represent true professional journalism like no one else.

[@netdoom]

BRETT STEVENS IS HERE

[@RimRimTim]

123

[@eea1119]

More Charlie please

[@TheHeadHunters]

BRET STEPHENS IS HERE!

[@nuqwestr]

Humans often find comfort in shared ignorance, whether willful or not.

[@meh9356]

Does that shared ignorance apply to libertarians too or they are immune? 😅

[@nuqwestr]

@@meh9356 We are all prone to this social/cohesive desire. The antidote is epistemic humility.

[@RMPdude]

Excellent interview. Thank you, Charlie. And Bret.

[@ADag83]

Loved this interview. Love how clear Bret is on Israel. However, Bret, and I, and other party-less lost liberals and centrists who care about social issues and freedom and global stability, and truth in journalism have to have a good long think, and come up with an answer on the day. Who will do less harm? These are strange enough times, and the candidates and parties are hopefully defined enough that we should be able to come up with a clear answer. And if the candidates are undefined, can that possibly count in favor of their bid for the presdency of the United States?

[@johnnantz16]

Great conversation as always with Charlie Rose and Bret Stephens; the level and quality of thinking in this conversation was just outstanding, bravo And thank you Charlie for all your incredible interviews over the years; what a gift, I feel a deep sense of gratefulness to you and for your work

[@beerman204]

Welcome back Charlie....

[@JumpingCow]

Very good. Bret Stephens is a very clear thinking communicator, who doesn't have all the answers.

[@catherinehills1418]

- Stephens interview was sure worth every word - tnx

[@alli6028]

Now I’m getting excited

[@kg192538]

Please repeat at frequent intervals - Rose & Stephens sessions. Congratulations for enlightening us all.

[@nayon9379]

✅️THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the Salvation of the last day that Christ brought in the second and last incarnation of the His new and holy name" (Behavior that cannot fully obey Me is betrayal. Behavior that cannot be loyal to Me is betrayal. Having many understandings and spreading them everywhere is betrayal. The inability to affirm My testimonies and interests is betrayal. These are all acts of betrayal that you have always been able to do, and they are common to you as well. None of you may think this is a problem, but I don't think so. You think that some act of treachery is only an occasional occurrence, not your characteristic behavior, and should not be discussed so seriously, in a way that damages your pride. To think like this is to be an example and example of rebellion. Man's nature is his life; it was a principle on which he depended to stay alive, and he could not change it. This is also the nature of betrayal---if you can do something to betray a relative or friend, it proves that it is part of your life and you were born with this nature. For example, if a person enjoys stealing from others, this "joy of stealing" is part of their life, although they may steal sometimes and not steal sometimes. Whether they steal or not, it cannot prove that their stealing is just a form of behavior. Rather, it proves that their thieving is a part of their life--that is, their nature. This is why I say that the source of this thought is not something that just breaks out from time to time, but is in this person's own nature.) Almighty God said BEHAVIOR that CANNOT FULLY OBEY Me is BETRAYAL. BEHAVIOR that CANNOT be FAITHFUL to Me is BETRAYAL. CHEATING on Me and USING LIES to DECEIVE Me is BETRAYAL. HAVING MANY UNDERSTANDINGS and SPREADING them EVERYWHERE is TREASON. The INABILITY to AFFIRM My TESTIMONIES and INTERESTS is BETRAYAL. OFFERING FALSE SMILES when the HEART is FAR from Me is BETRAYAL. These are ALL ACTS of BETRAYAL that YOU have ALWAYS been ABLE to DO, and they are COMMON to you as well. ☀️🙏 NONE of YOU may THINK this is a PROBLEM, BUT I DON'T THINK SO. I CANNOT TREAT SOMEONE'S BETRAYAL of Me as a SMALL MATTER, and I ESPECIALLY cannot ignore it. 🛑 Now, when I work among you, you act in this way---if the day comes when no one is there to watch over you, will you not be like bandits who have declared themselves kings? When that happens and you cause a major disaster, who will be there to fix the problem? You THINK that some ACT of TREACHERY is ONLY an OCCASIONAL OCCURRENCE, NOT your CHARACTERISTIC BEHAVIOR, and should NOT be DISCUSSED so SERIOUSLY, in a way that DAMAGES your PRIDE. If you really think like this, you lack common sense. To think like this is to be an example and example of rebellion. MAN'S NATURE is his LIFE; it is a PRINCIPLE on which he DEPENDS to STAY ALIVE, and he CANNOT CHANGE it. THIS is ALSO the NATURE of BETRAYAL--if YOU CAN DO SOMETHING to BETRAY a RELATIVE or FRIEND, it PROVES that it is a PART of your LIFE and you were BORN with THIS NATURE. 🛑 😪 THIS is SOMETHING that CANNOT be DENIED to ANYONE. For EXAMPLE, if a PERSON ENJOYS STEALING from OTHERS, this "pleasure to steal" is PART of THEIR LIFE, although they may steal sometimes and not steal sometimes. WHETHER they STEAL or NOT, it CANNOT PROVE that their STEALING is JUST a FORM of BEHAVIOR. Rather, it PROVES that their THIEVING is a PART of THEIR LIFE--that is, their NATURE. 🛑 Some people will ask: Since this is their nature, then why, when they see beautiful things, don't they sometimes steal them? The answer is very simple. There are many reasons why they don't steal. They may not steal something because it is too big to snatch from watchful eyes, or because there is no suitable time to act, or something is too expensive, too closely guarded, or maybe they are not particularly interested here, or notthey see how it will be of use to them, and so on. All of these reasons are possible. But anyway, whether they steal something or not, it cannot prove that this thought only exists as a fleeting and fleeting moment. On the contrary, it is a part of their nature that is difficult to change for the better. Such a person is not satisfied with stealing only once; such attitudes to claim other people's possessions as their own are formed whenever they encounter something beautiful, or a suitable situation. ☀️ This is the REASON WHY I SAY that the SOURCE of this THOUGHT is NOT a THING that just CUT off SOMETIMES, but is in this PERSON'S own NATURE. 🙏 From The WORD, Vol. I. The Manifestation and Work of God. A Very Serious Problem: Infidelity 1 📩 All who have "ears to listen" are led to what the Spirit of God is saying in His lowered and built kingdom/Church engraved with His new name, His totality, the ownership of this disposition, "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD "💐 fulfillment from what was said He to Peter 2,000 years ago recorded in (Matthew 16:18-19). His Coming is the fulfillment of all that was prophesied in the great book of Revelation, so the last "Salvation" He brought the whole truth, the way for eternal life. So the "victorious" ones who will receive them are the wise "virgins" because as recorded in the prophecy of His return no one knows it except the one who will receive it! So "come" and come to His kingdom/church standing in the holy place in the air/KZbin! This is also a fulfillment from the book of (Isaiah 2:2/9:6) which He first fulfilled in His first incarnation. 📥 "They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." 💌

[@hostashevsky]

Do you seriously believe Kamala's words during the campaign?! Don't you think she will betray these promises?

[@prestonthomas5399]

💯

[@davidduke2765]

Charlie is more important now than ever. He creates engaging conversations in a simple way so accessible to a wide range of an audience that includes me.

[@BH.Geneve]

The best combo - Rose & Stephens! Thank you!

[@patrickevans8482]

It would have been insightful to know his views about settlements on the West Bank.

[@tomr5632]

Please Charlie, ask your producer-assistant to fix your background. You have an aura or light around you that’s distracting. Or maybe just don’t use a black background. Great to see you doing interviews again!

[@nayon9379]

✅️THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the Salvation of the last day that Christ brought in the second and last incarnation of the His new and holy name" (Behavior that cannot fully obey Me is betrayal. Behavior that cannot be loyal to Me is betrayal. Having many understandings and spreading them everywhere is betrayal. The inability to affirm My testimonies and interests is betrayal. These are all acts of betrayal that you have always been able to do, and they are common to you as well. None of you may think this is a problem, but I don't think so. You think that some act of treachery is only an occasional occurrence, not your characteristic behavior, and should not be discussed so seriously, in a way that damages your pride. To think like this is to be an example and example of rebellion. Man's nature is his life; it was a principle on which he depended to stay alive, and he could not change it. This is also the nature of betrayal---if you can do something to betray a relative or friend, it proves that it is part of your life and you were born with this nature. For example, if a person enjoys stealing from others, this "joy of stealing" is part of their life, although they may steal sometimes and not steal sometimes. Whether they steal or not, it cannot prove that their stealing is just a form of behavior. Rather, it proves that their thieving is a part of their life--that is, their nature. This is why I say that the source of this thought is not something that just breaks out from time to time, but is in this person's own nature.) Almighty God said BEHAVIOR that CANNOT FULLY OBEY Me is BETRAYAL. BEHAVIOR that CANNOT be FAITHFUL to Me is BETRAYAL. CHEATING on Me and USING LIES to DECEIVE Me is BETRAYAL. HAVING MANY UNDERSTANDINGS and SPREADING them EVERYWHERE is TREASON. The INABILITY to AFFIRM My TESTIMONIES and INTERESTS is BETRAYAL. OFFERING FALSE SMILES when the HEART is FAR from Me is BETRAYAL. These are ALL ACTS of BETRAYAL that YOU have ALWAYS been ABLE to DO, and they are COMMON to you as well. ☀️🙏 NONE of YOU may THINK this is a PROBLEM, BUT I DON'T THINK SO. I CANNOT TREAT SOMEONE'S BETRAYAL of Me as a SMALL MATTER, and I ESPECIALLY cannot ignore it. 🛑 Now, when I work among you, you act in this way---if the day comes when no one is there to watch over you, will you not be like bandits who have declared themselves kings? When that happens and you cause a major disaster, who will be there to fix the problem? You THINK that some ACT of TREACHERY is ONLY an OCCASIONAL OCCURRENCE, NOT your CHARACTERISTIC BEHAVIOR, and should NOT be DISCUSSED so SERIOUSLY, in a way that DAMAGES your PRIDE. If you really think like this, you lack common sense. To think like this is to be an example and example of rebellion. MAN'S NATURE is his LIFE; it is a PRINCIPLE on which he DEPENDS to STAY ALIVE, and he CANNOT CHANGE it. THIS is ALSO the NATURE of BETRAYAL--if YOU CAN DO SOMETHING to BETRAY a RELATIVE or FRIEND, it PROVES that it is a PART of your LIFE and you were BORN with THIS NATURE. 🛑 😪 THIS is SOMETHING that CANNOT be DENIED to ANYONE. For EXAMPLE, if a PERSON ENJOYS STEALING from OTHERS, this "pleasure to steal" is PART of THEIR LIFE, although they may steal sometimes and not steal sometimes. WHETHER they STEAL or NOT, it CANNOT PROVE that their STEALING is JUST a FORM of BEHAVIOR. Rather, it PROVES that their THIEVING is a PART of THEIR LIFE--that is, their NATURE. 🛑 Some people will ask: Since this is their nature, then why, when they see beautiful things, don't they sometimes steal them? The answer is very simple. There are many reasons why they don't steal. They may not steal something because it is too big to snatch from watchful eyes, or because there is no suitable time to act, or something is too expensive, too closely guarded, or maybe they are not particularly interested here, or notthey see how it will be of use to them, and so on. All of these reasons are possible. But anyway, whether they steal something or not, it cannot prove that this thought only exists as a fleeting and fleeting moment. On the contrary, it is a part of their nature that is difficult to change for the better. Such a person is not satisfied with stealing only once; such attitudes to claim other people's possessions as their own are formed whenever they encounter something beautiful, or a suitable situation. ☀️ This is the REASON WHY I SAY that the SOURCE of this THOUGHT is NOT a THING that just CUT off SOMETIMES, but is in this PERSON'S own NATURE. 🙏 From The WORD, Vol. I. The Manifestation and Work of God. A Very Serious Problem: Infidelity 1 📩 All who have "ears to listen" are led to what the Spirit of God is saying in His lowered and built kingdom/Church engraved with His new name, His totality, the ownership of this disposition, "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD "💐 fulfillment from what was said He to Peter 2,000 years ago recorded in (Matthew 16:18-19). His Coming is the fulfillment of all that was prophesied in the great book of Revelation, so the last "Salvation" He brought the whole truth, the way for eternal life. So the "victorious" ones who will receive them are the wise "virgins" because as recorded in the prophecy of His return no one knows it except the one who will receive it! So "come" and come to His kingdom/church standing in the holy place in the air/KZbin! This is also a fulfillment from the book of (Isaiah 2:2/9:6) which He first fulfilled in His first incarnation. 📥 "They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." 💌

[@davibernstein]

More, more, please! Thanks, Charlie.

[@christinecamley]

Charlie you are the best!! Terrific conversation!!

[@moviola12]

Nice to hear from serious, and intelligent observers.

[@exeterline1930]

Glad to see you again. I was wondering if you gave up on those knees. Great video. The best one I've see in a long time. I miss the good old days when people were putting out good, informative shows daily. Yours were the best. I agree with everything he says. Anything but Trump. I share Stephen's questions. I don't know what the heck Kamala stands for either. I'll probably vote for her, too, hoping it doesn't bite me in the ass later with a wokie agenda designed to persecute people like me. I want to know now.

[@dinaf1409]

100%

[@pcpatel1949]

Welcome back Charlie. Missed you a lot.

[@jhaah5208]

btw, I provided your theme music, myself. It just popped into my head.

[@davidwhitehead5704]

Charlie, great interview. As always you ask good questions and don’t talk over the responses, leaving us to make our minds up. But please lose the strange black background.

[@deniseurdang3703]

heck, thought he was fired a long time ago for inappropriate behaviour!

[@dinaf1409]

Nobody knows what exactly happened. Could be hugely overblown out of proportion.

[@theonejmv]

10:55 beggining of an excellent point about "Defiance"

[@malindawilliams8779]

No, ur either forgetting or denying that Trump was highly popular w liberals in the 90s through the 2,000s until he turned on Obama & then had 2 run against Hillary! Howard Stern, Hugh Hefner & most of Hollywood loved this guy, he donated 2 Hillary’s senate & 2008 presidential campaign & donated 2 Harris AG & Pelosi’s campaign! The Clintons, Barbara Walters & Chris Matthews attended this man’s wedding in 2006! Barbara Walters couldn’t have him in The View enough! Liberals were just as scammed by him as Maga is now! He supported Obama until Obama put strict banking & lending regulations in place after he bailed out Wall St & Detroit! Rich ppl not allowed 2 get loans from American banks 4 x number of yrs based on their past history of defaulting on loans! Trump fell into that category! No press has talked about that since! He switched parties & became a republican & ran 4 president 4 one reason only, to get control our banks & deregulate banking & lending so he could take out more loans & fine bankruptcy & pocket the $! No one in the media on either side wants 2 admit thst because it mskes both sides look bad 4 cozying up 2 him!

[@RiazLaghari]

insightful!

[@exeterline1930]

I'm really tired of political games. Those people think the country belongs to them. They're not doing things that are in the best interests of most of its citizens. They want to institute their own agendas - not well considered compromises. I guess there's nothing new under the sun.

[@michaeltracy7988]

If the big debate is between liberalism and illiberalism a vote for Harris should be a no-brainer.

[@GlobalDrifter1000]

Very poor green screen, Chuck.

[@taleiran]

Thank you for this conversation! It appears that Bret Stephens dilemma is that he sees Trump as an awful human being whose policies as President were nevertheless largely correct and most aligned with liberal values while Kamala Harris has been wrong on most of the important issues in both foreign and domestic policies, and she champions the most illiberal leftist progressive views. So, he is not going to vote for either of them. On Hamas-Israel war, thank you Better Stephens for a clear explanation that Hamas is responsible for the civilian casualties in Gaza

[@creativenature2940]

neither most of Americans

[@dinaf1409]

He never said that. it's your interpretation.

[@MickLeonardJD]

Great Guest.

[@danesovic7585]

Brett Stephens, as an Israeli nationalist is understandably opposed to American nationalism.

[@asufluffhead]

Love Charlie, but that's creepy lighting. AI Charlie?

[@zusvayman549]

Tug of assimilation and Jewishness In 2002, Bret Stephens (Ehrlich) moved to Israel to become the editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post. He was 28 years old. Haaretz reported at the time that the appointment of Stephens, a non-Israeli, triggered some unease among senior Jerusalem Post management and staff. Stephens said that one of the reasons he left The Wall Street Journal for The Jerusalem Post was that he believed that Western media was getting Israel's story wrong. "I do not think Israel is the aggressor here", he said. "Insofar as getting the story right helps Israel, I guess you could say I'm trying to help Israel." Stephens led The Jerusalem Post during the worst years of the Palestinian {???}* campaign of suicide bombings against Israel and pointed the paper in a more neoconservative direction. Yet the "prodigy" Bret failed to change the terminology in favor of Israel. He continues to wobble in between left and right. Watch his recent interview with Charlie Rose. ™™™™™™™™™™™™ *) Local Arab campaign of bombings in Israel.

[@fantastichound]

Marvelous.

[@meh9356]

Welcome back Charlie. Bring back Mr Thomas Friedman, he has all the answers.😅. He had all the answers when you interviewed him more than 20 years ago. The world is Flat🤔 From Wikipedia " Friedman has been criticized for his staunch advocacy of the Iraq War" .. We love you Charlie... Good to see you back.

[@HarryJoiner]

10:52 - hope, defiance / personal branding 19:38 - impressions on Harris 24:17 - mid east / foreign policy 29:43 - Trump Ukraine 2016-20 36:08, 41:53 - liberalism v illiberalism 42:43 - “a biz so good any idiot can run it” 43:19, 44:12 - the system prevailed

[@blb1954]

Just goes to show you that NYT chokes when it comes to saying positive things about the Democratic candidates without listing the ‘disadvantages’

[@jimchen6236]

This looks an AI generated

[@deccanheart]

No one wants to challenge Israel about the illegal occupation of the West Bank. Isn’t that injustice and a provocation?

[@passerbyp8531]

US waiting for Perl Harbor?

[@zusvayman549]

200 000 Gaza's Arabs left to Cairo. They had to pay $7000 to Hamas and $7000 to the border guards in the Sinai occupied by Egyptians and the American military helped by Fiji, Italy, Colombia, Uruguay, France and other armies. Yet the Bedouin tribe Tarabin in the Sinai asks for money too...🇲🇫

[@theonejmv]

This guy is smart but refuses to vote for Trump when he clearly sees flaws in Harris

[@alexcipriani6003]

it’s very explicable it was part of inflation reduction the FEDs made that statement multiple times

[@DuckyQSimmons]

Definitely GEORGE BUSH bc otherwise, Bret wouldn’t have been so condescending as he described “a former president.”

[@demosthenescotto2190]

Welcome back Charlie Rose. You are truly a sight for sore eyes and a curious mind. Please do more interviews.

[@rosannacreates]

I've always thought Charlie Roses interviews questions were always the best.

[@andrewrodomar535]

This is proof - he’s NOT a bedbug AT ALL! Why do people keep making these absurd claims?

[@evelynramos445]

I stayed up w one eye for Charlie Rose

[@finiteloops8610]

Great interview. "I guess I'm not supposed to answer he's crazy" - but happily, and essentially, you did! Thank you.

[@williamhuang2976]

it's legit to doubt Harris character, experience and judgment. But we shouldn't forget the fact that the mainstream of Dem leadership is strong and central. Looking at GOP side, the party has transformed to a populist cult under trump. I'd believe that, on major international and domestic issues, Harris would make the right decisions for this country, whether she wants it or not.

[@x66paris]

Charlie, keep the interviews coming. Its an important time and you are missed! Get rid of the background--it is distracting.

[@michaeltracy7988]

Why are people so hard on Harris and so easy on Trump?

[@jeffreybookman8982]

It is mind-boggling how someone has intelligent and educated as Brett Stevens could be so blinded and ignorant to the reality that exists in the Middle East. To think that Israel should risk its survival and the lives of its people on the hope that all of a sudden all the radicals will be goneand “moderate Palestine will take control and live in peace with Israel. It’s never happened and it hasn’t even approached happening so how can Israel risk itself under these kind of conditions?

[@jackkinstlinger7304]

I found his position on ISRAEL to be right on accurate and fair

[@ThomasWBaldwin]

Looking good Charles.

[@js27-a5t]

Bret's columns have been infuriating me for years now, lol

[@raywest3834]

Ever see a Bruce Lee movie where he goes into the enemy dojo and kicks the ass of all 300 people there? Point is, there are no limitations when the script is written for you, and her friendly media are writing the script. She was everyone's last choice five minutes ago, now she's Kamala the Great, which is a gaslighting masterclass.

[@theonejmv]

Why did Biden never fire anyone over the migrant crisis? 😂

[@christinecamley]

Could you have someone on who is more right wing?

[@irene1804]

So good to see you doing more current interviews. I hope your show becomes a regular thing. Miss your show on PBS Charlie!

[@jjan5028]

This guy plays Charlie’s hand…down plays Trump and thus promotes Now Harris… definitely not an unbiased analyst…

[@jonathanblanchard6480]

Uncle joe, the soft spoken man...

[@jhaah5208]

I've missed you, Charlie Rose! Missed you very much.

[@Wanderingsomewhere145]

Mr Stephens is brilliant. Great interview. Thanks Charlie!

[@justmyopinion9883]

Hi Charlie Rose. Good to see you! 😊

[@italythroughmyeyes]

Some people should'nt come back!

[@Gram72534]

I don't think Trump's mato is defiance, I think it's fear/hate!!!!!!! More charlie please, he is the best interviewer on the planet !!!!!!!

[@adtastic1533]

Fearful people don't walk into a black journalist's conference and starting broadcasting racist slurs on stage in front of everyone. Thats IDGAF defiance.

[@davidlai399]

LOL

[@AKaczor2024]

You seriously support military support for Netanyahu at this point?

[@AKaczor2024]

Hundreds od experts talk about the global catastrophe, Trump just repears ,

[@nuqwestr]

"Woke" is illiberal in concept, as defined by Marx and Mussolini. Both hated classical liberalism, and both wrote manifestos against it.

[@Bumper_jed]

looking like a ghost

[@williamerdman4888]

Lost a lot of respect for Brett here.

[@DuckyQSimmons]

Charlie Rose looks like a ghost! 👻

[@sideler7057]

Very poor presentation of Charlie. Kinda ghoulish. Whatever that was, change it. Turn up some lights or something.

[@jjgreen5206]

It would be nice if Bret could be genuine and not smug for this interview. His doomsday, anarchist, nihilism is boring and played out. Those of us regular Americans could not be more bored with the rich people like him complaining about the leftist “elites”. At least those “elites” care about those less fortunate and the have the basic human ability to empathize, something that people like Bret lack.

[@GlobalDrifter1000]

Lost me by 2 minutes.

[@gabydiehl8314]

Great interview Charlie!

[@bh1935]

welcome back charlie

[@tyronejoihnson7046]

Charlie wasn’t wearing pants and was doing a Toobin.

[@user-qm7nw7vd5s]

What is the point of having a lefty interview a lefty?

[@Gram72534]

The point is to get to the truth and you can't get that from the right!!!

[@user-qm7nw7vd5s]

@@Gram72534 You think only the left has a monopoly on the truth? Does it occur to you, that is a pretty dumb, albeit revealing thing to say?

[@twittertwice]

Because neither have been lefties… particularly Bret Stephen’s…who was one of nytimes preeminent republicans… guess MAGAs don’t read, comprehend or think

[@MrTahuna333]

What the hell? Stephens is a republican and is centre-right.

[@jonathanblanchard6480]

The executive branch doesn't matter as much as the deep state currently...these guys

[@ivorycybernetics]

the world needs more of Charlie Rose....alot more

[@tomolegend6128]

👍

[@jjgreen5206]

I’m glad Charlie is back. He’s the best, but Bret needs to work on being less smug and entitled and more genuine. Maybe what he’s saying has some merit, but in my mind he seems to be following the sewer flow of social media