Brian Cox: The Universe Existed Before The Big Bang

Imagine if I told you that our universe has been around forever, even before the Big Bang. It might sound pretty wild, right? Well, hold onto your hats because renowned physicist Brian Cox is on board with this mind-bending idea.
For copyright matters please contact us at: [e-mail]

[@bsmith577]

The universe has always existed because space is the universe and has always been, it is a constant that does not shrink or grow. Matter within space also contains space which creates a vibration between matter and space that is gravity and creates the observable universe. Space and all the matter within it is like a galaxy circling a black hole and falling towards it until matter within the black hole becomes equal to the gravity of space and with the help of centrifugal force starts to expand into our flat observable universe.

[@alexleitchbscopen3905]

In a million years you won't think that it'll be very different

[@MarkmBha]

My head hurts.

[@johnhardasnails7464]

Remember Prot from kpax said the universe goes thru cycles of expansion and contraction where everything time and space related repeat exactly as before !! So he was saying you get only once chance that get it right

[@jorb8572]

Because we feel alone in the universe it’s the reason we talk about this. If we know we are not alone and we had communicate with aliens then it’s not interesting anymore.

[@donwheeler1208]

The BB theory was just that. A THEORY! It’s never been proven as fact and I for one never bought it anyway.

[@P4INKillers]

A theory in the context of science is significantly different from the common vernacular usage of the word. Everything you've ever used in your life was constructed based on theories. Facts are something else entirely; a theory can contain facts, but it cannot be a fact on its own.

[@Robert_L_Whitlatch]

No it's not even a theory. Atleast not a good one. A real scientific theory can be observed, repeated, but not fully proved. We can't verry well observe and repeat a BIG BANG so it's just a thought of what may have happened. Now you can call that a theory if you wish but I do not consider it a legitimate sceintific theory

[@janmale7767]

All those fantastical theories to try and explain the unexplainable! To stick to the gravity model neutron stars are supposed to spin around there axis in second or sub second times...is that even possible? Uy scuti one of the most massive solar bodies known, billions of times the mass of the sun is that even possible, wont it implode on itself in the gravity model of things? I have given up on reading about this stuff , cause i know there is a great chance it is erroneous!

[@johnrr8854]

Some theories are more established than laws. The fact that you say “only theory” means you do not know what theory means

[@christiansmith3994]

The observable universe is probably less than 0.1% of the real scale

[@Vesuvius1]

What a shocker 🙄 😂

[@gaul849]

I believe your right Mr Penrose.

[@user-pu2ho4ip3d]

A harmonically balanced self-Regenerative oscillating wave form.

[@TheoneTheone380]

There was not and naver a big bang. The universe is eternal.

[@StarZStudent]

where is the matter from? how it was made?

[@gaul849]

You would believe even though the universe is smaller than we think it's still very large.

[@Stavoren405]

If quarks can appear spontaneously, why can universes not? Is it not just the scale of the event that is so unimaginatively different. The notion of cyclical growth and decay is right in front of us, galaxies, black holes and the whole gamut?

[@gretareinarsson7461]

So we don’t know 😄

[@akink9620]

Make it up as thay go along

[@janmale7767]

I could have told you so, the universe has no beginning nor end it has always been like God has always been , the Alfa and Omega!

[@robertweston4334]

Tom Gold was right back in the 50's

[@camerashy656]

I’m with Mr Penrose on this one

[@taritkumar6270]

On d verge of a dyeing universe there r many black holes that coaalce while some get left behind of two or three dyeing universe may coaalse which might determine how big d new universe will be with what properties n with remenent black holes within this space...

[@richard-fy2mu]

If one believes in a mechanistic view, there is a set mix of energy and mater and the BB is merely one shift in the ratio of E to M and there cannot be such an origin since E/M shift over time but E+M=1 If a creationist, E/M is not random since E+M is the act of G-d. Either way, time +Distance=make your choice Boom or G-d!

[@peterstar2023]

Time is real, so says my boss

[@janmale7767]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤪

[@universalconsciousnessjaso7979]

😂😂

[@gaul849]

If one sees an object which it dose not exist at this time is it actually in the past or dose time actually matter.

[@gaul849]

If you peer into another universe I mean.

[@PeterRice-xh9cj]

Let’s say 2 zero dimensional points were separated by time, yet still both existed simultaneously. If 1 second was like 1 second to one of those zero dimensional points, but 1 week was like 1 second to the other, it would make sense why the two are separated by time yet still exist simultaneously. If 100 years went by while we never had a sense of being, that 100 years to us would seem like a flash because we wouldn’t have any memory of not having a sense of being. Let’s say we never had a sense of being forever. Would that infinitely long period of time be like a flash to us. Well if an infinitely long period of time existed it would be impossible to measure a finite period of time against it. I think the only way our sense of being can not exist, is if instead of 1 second feeling like one second, and 1 hour or 1 month felt like a second, our sense of being would not exist to someone who 1 second was like 1 second to. So if 1 week felt like 1 second to us, but 1 second felt like 1 second to the person standing next to us, according to that person standing next to us our sense of being does not exist. So if 1 week is like 1 second to us, would that mathematically be the same as our sense of being not existing for ever, ever and ever. To us, a hurricane, wave, or falling line of dominos doesn’t have a sense of being, but from what has been discussed is that really true.

[@stevemarks1511]

Unless one implies a God. There must of been something weather games that mutated and evolved to become what happened next. Billions of years it took to be where humans are.

[@rightfootlefthand]

Spacetime is a four dimensional entity. If we have space, then we have time, and vice versa: if we have time, then we must have space. The notion that time did not exist before the big bang is not logical. Time is timeless; there is no arbitrary zero point of time. We can obviously rewind to a billion years before the big bang in time. If we can extend time to before the big bang, then space must also have existed before the big bang, because where we have time, we also have space.

[@vjhjjjdgr]

Buda was really alien? he was know even recent discovry😮

[@MarkquaviseNichols-xo8wg]

Im a 52 year old athiest leaning towards agnostic I see some comments about it wasnt God come on if your a athiest you should really rethink this i was a hardcore athiest though my teens to early 50s maybe there was something probably not what ideal of a religious person concept of a supreme entity but we also discovered 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe that what changing me be open to a God every time i see new discovers i just dont know 😊

[@dmahan8841]

Brian Cox, simple.. always was and is wrong. period.

[@MrDeanjp32]

I’d say you talk tosh!

[@revddtunivesralbroadcaststash]

wow I been first to post a bunch lately, very rare ... cool ..hello from Idaho, now b4 you go hating on Idaho ..its actually a beautiful mountainous state.

[@sarbnitrof4663]

I only hate Idaho because you felt the need to mention it

[@LesterWayneDobos]

These videos are basically to educate religious people. God is the universe and vice versa. Except conversations about reality cannot be held if all the person rants about is god this god that enough with that god crap already there is more to understand than that and you are shallow headed if the word god is all you use to define every aspect of existence. Sure god did it, farts smell, sound is loud and light is bright there are mechanics behind the forces of nature and a god used to describe them gets humanity no where.

[@Vesuvius1]

They know nothing about the universe at all

[@brahmdevsingh5287]

Or... Scientists are wrong. Again

[@andyjones1899]

Ive said it before and ill say it again..this Universe was spawned from a previous Universe and i can explain to you how..its not turtles all the way down..its previous Universes..Penrose is close but not quite there yet..

[@richardlovato6301]

This whole reason of scientific speculation is that they just don't want it to be God but I'm going to say this is proof that God still holds the truth

[@sarbnitrof4663]

That's some silly shit to say

[@moleculist7978]

You and these overinflated nitwit scientists belong in exactly the same category.

[@Ibethepappy]

Any scientist that says God does not exist is not a true scientist. One may not believe or may not think a god exists based on evidence but there are no absolutes in modern science. There must always be room for change.

[@Justlooking94]

No, it doesn't.

[@richardlovato6301]

This guy is a lier he said you can't creat a tree from a single leaf cause yes you can it's called cloneing this guy is a lier just a flat out lier don't believe a single thing he says

[@sarbnitrof4663]

What is a lier? Since when can we clone an entire tree from a single leaf?

[@robbk]

​@sarbnitrof4663 lier is someone who lies. It's a noun. It's an alternate spelling of liar, which is the more common spelling. Remember that for Scrabble.

[@richardlovato6301]

@@sarbnitrof4663 they clone plants all the time they eve splice different types of fruiting trees to get a multiple of fruit off one base before you ask you should do a little research on plant cloneing done all the time especially if you have a particular that has developed it will make the clone exactly but you need to reasrarch