Dynam - Focke-Wulf - Fw 190 1.3m - Second Thoughts

[@Jack-gy7cs]

I've always been one of those people who preferred quality over quantity and would wait until I could afford the quality product....cars, house, toys, etc. I thank you for pointing out the lack or absence of quality so I don't have to discover it for myself and waste my time and money and be frustrated with it. As always kudos to the amazing camera crew.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Thanks Jack for getting the point ;) As for working hard and waiting for the better choice, I guess, I'd say I'm somewhere between this type of plane and eflite, when I started out, but I would have had a more limited RC budget, so I'd end up with the Dynam + NECESSARY Upgrades ;) I just hope that new RC pilots don't get this FIRST...then assume it's always like this. Here's to hoping Bitgohobby and some of the other Dynam distributors can work together to bring some necessary changes to the Dynam lineup.

[@dalerbsr.5061]

Keep coming back because you have the best camera crew, and you are funny but to the point. Keep rockin

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Nice! Glad to hear the positive feedback! Thanks Dale!

[@petersuso3360]

Hi Brain. I had a similar plane from Hobbyking and I had the same problem with the landing gear. I put it on a separate switch and removed the plastic wheel covers. Now it works well.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

These retracts are bound by the wheels, not the covers, unfortunately. I've had that symptom before too, and removed or modified the covers to fix other planes too.

[@boss2234]

I will have to have this plane to go with my mustang , just bought 3 planes, Hard to hide big boxes😂😂😂🥴. Grate job as always.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

THREE??!?! You may need to get working on the Dog House ;) LOL!

[@philippebaudon]

HI Brian, sorry for my English not very fluently. I have the same problem with my retract gear on the messerschmitt BF 110. How can I say, the piece of metal with the wheel isn't "bloc" with the servo/retract. after 2 or 3 flights, the piece of metal move and the angle change. conclusion, the gear don't work very well !!! I hope you understand me. HI from france

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I do understand you, but haven't come up with a great solution, unfortunately.

[@alangentry6295]

Well I have a dynam too and the landing gears doing the same thing I bought the BF 110 order new landing gear for it though good review Brian Phillips

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Thanks Alan! You're the poster child of what I want people to do - watch me struggle through the process, then learn what I did wrong, or ran into, then make a value judgment ahead of time to curb the battle against less than perfect QC on some planes ;) Thanks Alan! We're glad you're here with us, and glad you're helping support us when you buy from our links!!!

[@FatGuyFliesRC]

I have a few minor problems with my gear on my Dynam FW 190 but I agree it just flies so good and looks so good I am willing to put up with the Dynam gremlins. The BF 109 is the same, flies fantastic but there is always that moment when you say will it be a belly landing or will the gear work this time. You should try the 109 PNP and put a ar630 in it or a lemon rx stabilizer like I did. Shout out to your very patient Camera Crew!!! I would be willing to bet our wives would have a lot of the same ideas about being plane widows....LOL!!

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

"plane widows" - LOL!!!

[@josephpadilla194]

Can you put a spectrum receiver in a dynam plane as a plug in play?

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Absolutely! That's what MOST people do.

[@josephpadilla194]

Do you have any plans to do a unbox build and review of the Dynam DY8967PNP Cessna 188 I really would like to find a good build and review of it my son loves the movie planes and I want to find a plane that looks like dusty for him thanks

[@rupman27isback]

Before even clicking the video.. Anyone else already hear the words.. "Yooutuube.. It's Brian Phillips .."? Haha

[@rupman27isback]

@@toolbaggers me too! lol

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Awesome! KZbin, it's Brian Phillips - gotta say it all cheesy too!!!

[@elmix2.031]

Hi you have how many aircraft in total

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Aircraft? Hundreds, but I don't have an accurate count.

[@bobbythomas2018]

Hey Brian do you think the same retracts are in the Dynam F6F ?

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I don't know, don't have it yet, but I'd like that one too ;)

[@Keon_MkIX]

Love that spiral spinner 🙌

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Me too - beautiful!!!

[@RykerRC]

Famous last words - “I’m just gonna get that Dynam.” 😀 if you gotta have one, still worth it.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

LOL LOL LOL!!! Dynam - It's like going to a kids concert and expecting a symphony ;)

[@crutch958]

What a redemption landing nice job, do you think your plane is a one off? As far as retracts.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I think it's probably going to be like this for most. I can understand why you'd ask, with Dynam sometimes being "hit or miss"...but unfortunately, I think the retracts (the servo-less retract) is too weak, and the bogies don't allow for the slightest mis-alignment or the wheels bind into the wheel well. Possibly with stronger retracts the bogeys wouldn't be a huge issue...but I'm not sure about that.

[@chrisscotty4518]

Is this the same plane as h-king fw190 and the toprc fw190 Seems to be a good plane except of the retracts

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I can't say it is. TopRC and Hobbyking may be the same, but this is Dynam.

[@ericirish1606]

Looks good, like to see it flying next to the June Nite

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

That would be pretty cool, but the June Nite is about 2X to 3X better plane ;)

[@ericirish1606]

@@BrianPhillipsRC mustang is my favorite plane and car 😆

[@boss2234]

A grate review you put it out there like it is.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Glad you liked it, and great plane less the retracts.

[@robertrc3798]

Really cool plane

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Sure is! Just need the retracts to get sorted out and she'll be good to go!

[@travisbertain7522]

That is a good looking plane

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

yeah, just wish the retracts would work better ;(

[@travisbertain7522]

@@BrianPhillipsRC ya that is the worst part

[@hassanabuomar1174]

Good luck for 100,000

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Thanks - it's coming soon ;)

[@mikenowland2739]

Have you been in touch with Bobby from Bitgo Brian ? He would be interested in your feedback . They are trying to improve the quality of the Dynam models.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I would invite speaking with him, but to date, we haven't spoke. I deal with his business partner. I KNOW they want to improve Dynam, that's why I work with them. If I believed they weren't, I'd have given up on Dynam a long time ago. Buying anything that's imported is a bit of a risk, and in our case, our North American Distributors are our ONLY line of defense against garbage. They help shape the quality control, cost, looks, feel, and overall experience with our goods. With Bitgohobby, I firmly believe that they're here to serve us in the RC community. They have an uphill battle against a lot of shortcoming with Dyman, but I will continue to bring NO-BS reviews, and help you, as a consumer, to know what you'll get when you get it from Bitgohobby. My PRIMARY allegiance it to you, the viewer, and secondly to our affiliates. I don't want to be unfair to our affiliates, because they took a risk working with us, and they too, want us to succeed. They're trying to reach who we reach, and they want us to help fight hard for your RC budget, but I'm working as a bit of a mediator. When problems arise, I want to give them opportunity to resolve conflict, while sharing the possibility of issues from China with you, a potential buyer, BEFORE you drop $300 on a plane. I know most of this is pretty obvious, but we really WANT Dynam to get their issues resolved. I think they could keep the lower price point, and improve quality to the point that their planes are 98% in stead of 90% good. If they want to shoot for Horizon Hobby level sales and support, they're going to have to work very hard to build better reputation. This will take YEARS, and YEAR only after some of these problem become the EXCEPTION to the rule...not the rule. This of course, is much easier said, then done. I bet they're going to have to make a few trips over to China to have some heart to heart meetings to resolve many of these issues, and the profit margins will be either shrunk a bit, or cost will need to go up a little bit....either way, if they hope to make success of this venture, something will probably need to change for the better. The world doesn't need another "General Hobby" - noteworthy for horrific customer support, and ALL that's wrong with imported Chinese junk...also, please note that not ALL Chinese imports are "junk". Much of it IS, because the Chinese business model is very good! They know that if we can buy for $5, they must make it for $2 or LESS! They know how consumers buy, and they have many advantages over us here in the States. I don't begrudge China for going after our market, but I'd love to see some more American MFG companies seriously innovate something here....but I wouldn't be willing to pay 3-4 times what I pay for some of the GOOD Chinese imports. Just some quick thoughts. I think a lot about these things.

[@robertrc3798]

Would you ever review a glow engine plane

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I would if it were the right plane. We have room on the property for bigger planes too, in the back, but we don't really have a runway cut yet.

[@snoriverrc3842]

I love Warbirds, they are very falcon'like, if you've ever seen a Peregrine falcon go head to head with a crow its like a battle out of WW2. Unfortunately I am dealing with either a gravel driveway, or a grass runway so anything with small landing gear is a no go. I am relegated to bush planes and belly landers, luckily both are very popular nowadays. Have you done any Arrows RC products? I am loving the Husky and Bigfoot, and their Vector stabilizer is awesome.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I'd like to work with them, but they won't reply to my emails...so I guess, Their Loss???? Next time you speak with them, let them know we want to work with them too!

[@PhilBender612]

Hey Bri,the plane looks great BUT, that's a bummer, Dynam needs to get those retracts right. That's the main reason why I buy planes like that... retractable landing gear baby! ....what good is it if it don't work. Oh well. One day.....

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Yeah, I totally agree. This plane is very nice, and went together about as easy as we've experienced with Dynam, but then the retracts didn't fit into the hole - what a bummer ;(

[@gbro8822]

Great job, thank you guys.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Our pleasure!

[@looneytunes47]

i had to run a 3300mah 4s all the way forward plus add 28 grams of weight in the nose to get a good solid penetrating authoritive flight out of mine..i never shy away from putting the battery all the way to the front on all warbirds.

[@arkboy3]

My Dynam Spitfire did the same thing with the retracts.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

That's a bummer!!! They seem to have a few planes with decent retracts now, but I think for the health of the company, it would make great sense to go ahead and upgrade them all to the better goods...even if they have to jack the price $10-20 per model...it's pretty much an expectation anymore.

[@boss2234]

You need to do a review with the dog simulators they show in your adds that thing looks cool

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

That would be cool!!!!!

[@christheoutlaw5748]

Sometimes it is hard to make a bad deal look good but you do a awesome job put some eflit landing gear in it and it would be awesome

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

True, except that the fit is the issue...not JUST the retracts... I think with MORE power, they might work right, but if they fit better, these retracts might be just fine.

[@boss2234]

I just got Dynam Hell cat like it a lot but with all Dynam planes , I beef them up a bit🤔🙂🙂🙂🙂

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I want that one too!

[@FromAboveAndBeyondChannel]

Its a beauty 👌

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

sure - if you get it, just leave the gear DOWN ;)

[@FromAboveAndBeyondChannel]

@@BrianPhillipsRCYee thats for sure 😁

[@boss2234]

You will like the Hell cat reminds you of a Horizon product. Easy build.😁😁

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I hope, and want it!

[@PhilBender612]

Lol.. "that's one way to land a Dynam". Too funny Bri. Does the other way involve a full power dive right into the ground? I'm just kidding. Thanks Brian.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I've done that type of landing too!!! ;)

[@oldscratch3540]

Your gona make pilote Robert jealous. He loves that model.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Pilot Ryan????

[@oldscratch3540]

@@BrianPhillipsRC pilot Robert those guys from Slovenia

[@garygullikson6349]

My take is that retracts, regardless of brands and types, can be a PITA. Watch failed retracts in large scale international competitions. Dynam retracts are probably cheapest available to Dynam from who knows. Dynam airframes generally fly well. I like to see how a model performs without stabilization.

[@jasonyodiputra6977]

Make a transmitter hand cam while you landing please

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

noted, but don't hold your breath Jason.

[@bradbutler6861]

Damn Dynam

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

I was looking for the Dam gift shop too - have you seen it around here?!??!? What about the Dam bathrooms????

[@grumpyjohntxredneckrc6346]

Well I Think It's Still A Dynam! 😝🤣 Thanks

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Yes.... LOL

[@Archon-Luke]

Those gear look awesome. Lol

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

They DID look awesome, but now they not only look bad, but still basically work crappy ;( Double whammy!!! LOL This plane flies great!

[@timbacchus]

Good price

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Yeah, but keep in mind the work will follow for making the retracts work properly. Other than that, this plane has been really nice!

[@andrewheikkila9524]

This plane would look amazing if the landing gear weren't disappointing

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

100% nailed it.

[@New2Kendo]

FMS quality control really seems to be hit n miss. Edit I ment Dynam

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

This is not FMS. FMS has been VERY good. This is a Dynam, just to be clear ;)

[@New2Kendo]

@@BrianPhillipsRC that's what I ment, its been a long month, already. I take care of my elderly Mom and she fot diagnosed with A Fib, Sleep Apnea, amd had a stroke not long ago. Its been a rough year

[@boss2234]

Dof simulator. My mistake

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

no problemo!

[@paulhope3401]

Draco next.. or I'm boycotting Horizon hobby products forever for this ridiculous situation of them not allowing you to review it yet.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Don't boycott them!!! That's crazy - They worked out a deal with Mike and it was a pretty fair deal. We're just playing along to be supportive. After all, Mike and HH did a TON of work to bring this thing of beauty to us...it was after all a privately designed plane. Not 100% sure if I can say this in any level of specificity, so I'll be intentionally VAGUE here...We could have all been forced to pay royalties on EVERY plane made...but Mike was so reasonable, he had a much simpler, and much more economical deal for HH. That being said, don't fear - we're filming the unbox, build, and radio setup in a few minutes ;) I'm pretty excited, but the weather is crap, so we won't be flying her right away... ;( In the mean time, Paul, please read my "blanket" reply for a good chuckle, and spend on - We have the Draco now, BUT we aren't allowed to review yet. This is not our choice. We will ABSOLUTELY BE REVIEWING IT ASAP! Please understand, our hands are tied...We can't even publish photos :(.... All I can say, is if you decide to buy anything from us in the mean time, just follow the "Master Link"...and you can navigate to whatever you decide you can't live without, or any of the other links below too. Master Link Horizon Hobby bit.ly/38ZFade Eflite A10 UMX & 64mm bit.ly/2P1i286 Apprentice 1.5m & Mini bit.ly/2OIjVHd Air Tractor 1.5m bit.ly/3tqdyHe Carbon Z Cessna 150 2.1m bit.ly/30PJkkD Carbon Z Cub SS 2.1m bit.ly/30P5mUA Carbon Cub S2 1.3m bit.ly/3bS2r3O Conscendo Evo 1.5m bit.ly/3bVtYkM Citation Longitude UMX bit.ly/30RwdQ4 Cherokee 1.3m bit.ly/3vyjdNi EC1500 1.5m bit.ly/3lmzSyw Extra 300 bit.ly/3rVnMiw F15 64mm bit.ly/30RrnlG F16 70mm bit.ly/3bUUxXv F18 80mm bit.ly/3bTssQa Fw190 1.5m bit.ly/2NswTZ2 F4U Corsair 1.2m bit.ly/30TcMX3 Habu 70mm bit.ly/38Kilv1 Vapor Night UMX bit.ly/30RbRGA Timber Turbo Night X UMX bit.ly/3cEjplB P39 1.2m bit.ly/3loUdmP P51 1.2m / 1.5m bit.ly/3bU5icI P47 1.2m bit.ly/3rYD9Xi T28 1.1m / 1.2m bit.ly/3eOh9Lk Su30 70mm bit.ly/3qUvjN5 Sport Cub S2 UMX bit.ly/3cDYUW1 Valiant 1.3m bit.ly/3rUTtsn Viper 1.1m bit.ly/3eLqcMX Twin Otter 1.2m bit.ly/2OnOuBQ Aeroscout mini & 1.1m bit.ly/30MNn1c Ultrix UMX bit.ly/3rWgPOe Ultimate 3D bit.ly/3cJ1JoT V900 bit.ly/3rVG0QZ V1200 bit.ly/3lmn8bg Maule 1.5m bit.ly/3bRAB7J Rx AR631 bit.ly/3pYNC3c AR637T bit.ly/3pW3u86 AR8360T bit.ly/3dKg4n6 AR6610T bit.ly/33SYkA0 Lem 7Ch DSMXwStab amzn.to/2GTlQze / ebay.to/2XNteGf A3L amzn.to/2nKsdxt / bit.ly/2UYmlBM FMS Fox 3m bit.ly/3mTNwcF ASW17 2.5m bit.ly/3nLuFjU Moa 1.5m bit.ly/37N9FCS PC-21 1.1m bit.ly/3bCrHKg Pitts 1.4m bit.ly/36e9ZLo F4U Corsair 1.7m bit.ly/2HV65xP Futura 80mm bit.ly/39N0khh

[@rafaeltorres2886]

Maybe you should only fly eflight don't review Dynam any more.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Why? So that you can get blindsided when you get an issue like we had on this plane? We're trying to share what's GOOD and BAD about these planes. This plane flies amazing, and looks ALMOST as good (10 feet out) as the new 1.5m eflite, but it's like 1/3 the cost! And the retracts basically don't work...oh well. It's like this, when you're a kid, you watch lamborghinis and ferraris driving around and think - WOW that's cool! - but you and I will probably never drive one... Well, I see all these model planes, and I think WOW that's cool! - I work with these distributors to bring it in REAL life to you before you have to buy it yourself, and then when it sucks, you can move your RC budget to another Dynam or another plane that better fits your needs....OR you can buy this AND some higher quality retracts, and plan for another half day project to get her flying good. Anyway, I think sometime the point of what WE'RE doing here is missed. 1) We want to help teach new RC pilots how to get into the hobby. 2) We want to STOP "one and done's" - when someone gets a plane that's TOO hard for them, and they crash it and they quit the hobby 3) We want to help fellow RC enthusiasts to spend their limited RC budget the best they can 4) We want to share the latest and greatest RC aircraft 5) We want to help others to position themselves to best enjoy the hobby in their own way 6) We want to encourage people who are thinking of giving up 7) We want to GROW the RC community thus enlarging it's reach and legislative power to keep the politicians at bay 8) We want to GROW the RC community to reduce the price of increasingly better technology and equipment 9) We want to enjoy the hobby and share out experience 10) We want to work together (Megan and I) on something 11) We want to open up doors to people interested in aviation 12) We want to explore new and exciting aspects of aviation 13) We want to share about our lives and learn about our audience 14) We want to have real relationships with others involved in aviation No doubt we fail from time to time, but these are many of our goals on our channel. We work hard to produce this content. It's not easy, and it's not without sacrifice by me, but mostly from my wife and family.

[@rafaeltorres2886]

@@BrianPhillipsRC I doesn't seem like you enjoy it your always rolling your eyes when your giving your review.

[@musk-eteer9898]

dynam planes looks and flys OK, but landing is NOT good.

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

Depends on the plane - some fly and land great, but they are a bit hit and miss. I review then so you can sort through the ones that look amazing, but perform less than stellar, so you don't have to avoid buying them, but rather, so you can buy them and KNOW what you'll have to do to make it awesome, like you expect it to be ;)

[@daniloricardopianucci2607]

Brian very beautiful...

[@BrianPhillipsRC]

She is a beauty, but if only the retracts worked well ;(