Brit SHOCKED at USA and Russia Military Power 2024

[@toddfulton2280]

The Russians are counting old Soviet era equipment, particularly tanks and artillery. Just keep that in mind.

[@marklar7551]

Conscripted troops, derelict boats, old ass planes, basically nothing works well (boats sinking etc.) The only things we really manufacture here in the US are military weapons. 🇺🇲👽🗿👽🇺🇸

[@nochannel1q2321]

Wow, whoever did this video is absolutely not counting losses in Ukraine. You can visually inspect the secure parking lots where they store their tanks and note them growing smaller and smaller in stock and some of them have now become empty entirely.

[@rych2703]

Didn't a lot of their tanks break down and strand troops in Ukraine?

[@nochannel1q2321]

@@rych2703 Not sure. Many thousands have been destroyed in combat, though.

[@toddfulton2280]

@rych2703 I wouldn't be surprised. The weapons and equipment Ukraine captured were said to be not fit for service. Their single aircraft carrier can only function for a few days at a time before it starts catching on fire and needs to be repaired. No one is really sure how many functioning nukes they have as they decay and need regular maintenance before becoming essential useless. Considering the levels of corruption in their military, their limited budget, and the low probability of nuclear weapons ever being used, there is a good chance that many of their nuclear weapons are nonfunctional.

[@susanotis792]

American military personnel are all voluntary. Russia is compulsory.

[@BM-hb2mr]

Not all volunteers

[@nannerz1994]

​@@BM-hb2mrThere's no draft in the US right now so yes they are all in the military because they chose to.

[@worstgamer1162]

Almost all my friends from HS signed up. They weren't forced or none​@@BM-hb2mr

[@Member00101]

@@worstgamer1162 They used to use military service as an option to stay out of jail for minor offenses. So maybe you can consider that still being voluntary because you ultimately had a choice, but it was that or jail time.

[@MrYabber]

14,000 tanks but they all suck and they’ve lost thousands of them to American made weapons lol.

[@BrianPasko]

This whole video feels like Russian propaganda my dude

[@joewinter7366]

The original videos maker is I believe Russian (possibly Russian American)

[@sharon8015]

Totally I know they don't have that much because they've been having to dig into their old equipment just to fight Ukraine they've been having to get stuff out of museums and warehouses to use in their battle against Ukraine so I know that's BS

[@BillMartin-h2g]

@sharon8015 Sort of like how all the former Warsaw Pact countries have been selling and donating all their old Soviet tanks and equipment to Ukraine, huh?

[@richardwright345]

My Grandfather once told me that FIREPOWER never out does ACCURACY.

[@nannerz1994]

Stormtroopers once told me that too

[@DartJedi]

That is why Wyatt Earp was so successful as a lawman. He was very accurate not fast. If you have to shoot more than once you might be dead.

[@BurntFrenchToast106]

We put more money in air superiority and quality

[@JustMe-dc6ks]

And training.

[@nannerz1994]

Can't really get to us very easily with a tank now can you russia?

[@creatureofdarknessxd1166]

One thing to keep in mind is that the US is managing to keep up with Russia in military production. That may not sound all that important, but Russia is in a war, and the US technically isn't. That means they're running on a military economy centered around military production. In other words, the US is stronger because they're running on a domestic economy. Imagine the boom in the US's military might during a big war. There's a reason Germany didn't want Japan to attack them during WWII.

[@toksykgaming9773]

What you also have to realize, quantity does not mean quality. US equipment is maintained and regularly replaced, Russia isn't well maintained and uses old and out dated equipment.

[@eddiehaskell1957]

That's how much equipment Russia says it has and we know Russia doesn't lie.

[@LEK-we2hh]

🙈🤣 doesn't lie

[@The_Prayer_Station]

Cant. Believe the numbers, otherwise why would Russia need fighters from North Korean in the Ukraine?

[@frankmcwilson445]

I was just about to write the same thing and saw your post.

[@foundingfarther]

The same reason America uses fighters from other countries? More fighters is generally better than fewer.

[@Drako_Sayre]

@@foundingfarther says someone who know nothing about the US Military. 😂😂😂 go away troll

[@foundingfarther]

@@Drako_Sayre Wow, this is awkward. America has coalition forces from many countries. Before the world wars America was a major coalition force for the UK. 🤣

[@barcster2003]

Russia does becasue they get wiped.

[@chadro_g1145]

Yeah there’s a big problem with this video, a BIG problem. That being, these were the numbers BEFORE the war in Ukraine. They are down ~ 10k tanks, ~ 1 Million men, thousands of APCs, lots of ships, airplanes, and helicopters, and countless small arms, missiles, drones, artillery, and various other types of hardware. These were predominantly older, other than the men, and come from the soviet days. They are, or are damn near, antiques by comparison. Then you add the fact that they do NOT do the required maintenance to keep them in good working order, this includes their aircraft, which is scary for those pilots I’m sure. Their artillery is as old school as it comes. That means they have to get coordinates for the target, shoot, observe the results, adjust, and repeat until they walk the hits in as close as they can get. Ours, pick the window you want it to go through and that’s where it hits. The same goes for our missiles. Russia tends to want to use rockets a lot. In that sense they don’t really “aim” so much as they just kind of shoot in the right direction and hope for the best. Basically, there is no comparison when you get beyond the digits and start looking at what the actual impact of each item would be.

[@brianlewis5692]

Russia has more reserve soldiers probably because military service in Russia is compulsory

[@shanabutler7627]

Yep you are told to go you go. I saw a video on a guy that Russia had out fighting against Ukraine, he was 1 less in the category of chromosomes. I was like really??? He was the only one who survived and was on his own I believe. That’s insane. If Russia had to, they would put out kids and elderly.

[@jefferyshute6641]

​@@shanabutler7627Actually, I recently saw video of a Russian squad of men all over 60 years old. One of them was 70. To be honest, most of them looked like chronic alcoholics. Sad, really. But, that's the situation Putin created.

[@cherylt6762]

How many of these are being lost in the war with Ukraine

[@rrrxx11]

Exactly!!! Plus the quality of USA is superior.

[@donscott6431]

@@rrrxx11remember that when Trump needs THE most intelligent people to work IN America FOR America, regardless of immigrant status

[@marvincasteel4876]

@@donscott6431 whatever you say Demorat! DOH!

[@SpreadDemocracyUSA]

​@@donscott6431Oh you're talking about his cabinet members, all of which are LEGAL IMMIGRANTS.

[@shanabutler7627]

Democrat or Demorat? Honest question.!

[@foundingfarther]

3:45 US has many nuclear powered carriers who's fuel source can last decades while the Russian's carriers are fueled by diesel.

[@robertevans2450]

Correction, Russian Carrier propulsion is a special hybrid called TUG. It is hard to get, so long-distance travel is reserved for only the most important missions, otherwise Russian Carriers tend to stay near a peer...like rope distance near.

[@foundingfarther]

@robertevans2450 I looked up TUG hybrid ,Russia, Admiral Kuznetsov but everything ive seens says they refine diesel from mazut. Sorry friend.

[@robertevans2450]

@@foundingfarther The humor must not of translated well. No need for "Sorry", as I'm a US Navy Cold War Veteran, so rest comfortably knowing I laughed well. It makes us all sad to see what Russia has done to the Soviet Union's greatness, from a viscously mean bear to what it is today, one of those red pandas that is cute.

[@foundingfarther]

@@robertevans2450 I was laying down to sleep as I read your joke and it went right over my head. 🤣 So what do you think was great about the soviets?

[@itsahellofaname]

Numbers don't mean a thing if the equipment has a tag on it that says "Expires in 1968".

[@steelersx6]

NO NEED TO CONTROL THE GROUND WITH TANKS AND CANNONS WHEN YOU CAN CONTROL THE SKY WITH THOUSANDS OF HIGH TECH AIRCRAFT

[@BM-hb2mr]

And the ones we aren't told about too

[@SpreadDemocracyUSA]

Sorry to say it but the ground is crucial for air superiority. If the enemy has SPAA and SPML, your aircraft are done for. Ground forces and air forces compliment each other.

[@BM-hb2mr]

@SpreadDemocracyUSA not all the time. In some cases yes but those days are over my friend it's all about the sky

[@josephdevuono4231]

Ground forces will never be obsolete. Aircraft can take the ground, but they can't build on to it.

[@Bijou2013]

You also have to look at the source of the video. Depending on who's counting, these videos all show really different numbers. And, yes - the US equipment is definitely decades newer and much more advanced.

[@erinkavelak8953]

Russias equipment is well over 3 decades old and in super bad shape. It is showing how poor the equipment is in Ukraine which is definitely not the United States.

[@sector986]

Quality > Quantity

[@maryhubbard2889]

A lot of Russian stuff doesn't work

[@xsqatterx]

the nuke situations are now tied basically, the US actually within 10 years we caught up to Russia lol

[@Sherri-n11]

None of this takes into account the amount of arms and personal that have recently been depleted in current battles. Plus they can't/aren't showing the top secret arms that aren't known to the public.🤔

[@quellcristsmith7602]

When you control the air and sea, land is the last concern. Drone strikes can happen from the comfort of a base instead of boots on the ground. ❤

[@Sunshineandflowers1997]

The United States has allies in many countries. Britain is one of them. That's how we make up the differences in equipment and man power. Russia has to mostly rely on themselves and they have to worry more about being attacked from outside enemies.

[@joewinter7366]

The real question should be, how many working, and updated. Also, properly trained servicemen.

[@TheRayHarris]

There is a major difference in how the US and other nations count military equipment. Most of our equipment isnt even apart of the official numbers for “legal” reasons

[@twenty-nineeleven]

Russia = quantity over quality USA = Quantity with Quality

[@Trifler500]

6:26 - Utility helicopters for carry troops into battle, for carrying supplies, for medevac, etc. Many of them can fight too. It's just the Attack Helicopters are focused on offense.

[@The_Prayer_Station]

Putin offers to pay off debts as recruitment tool in war against Ukraine. Putin signed a bill into law that offers to pay off up to $96K in exchange for military service....that is a news headline from today. A nation doesnt offer something like that if they have as many reserves as stated in the video.

[@darcyjorgensen5808]

Americans volunteer for military service, including reserves.

[@JamesHunt-e3u]

Since Ukraine, Russia has about 5k tanks left and can only build about 250 a year. They're losing 100s a month. So they'll be out soon if this continues

[@badkarmaa420]

If the USA was in an active war like Russia it would be different. Russia is currently in a wartime economy

[@jed1729]

They won't do updated list of how much are Russia has lost during the war have been pulling out the 1950 tanks out of storage

[@SirBedevereTheWise]

What you got to understand: America's policy demands air dominance (not air supremacy, it's AIR DOMINANCE). We have the world's largest Air Force & the world's second largest Air Force (United States Navy Air Fleet). Our troops, our mlrs, nothing takes to the field until we get Air dominance. That's why we have more jets and support aircraft than anything else

[@ladiwilliams9739]

If you control the skies you control the war. Russia's land equipment is very old and most of it is nonfunctional. After something is decommissioned it's not counted anymore. However, they are still functional and can be called into action if needed.

[@raider2191]

Russia would need that many more than what they have now. NONE of their tanks are of modern design. I've heard the are at a 10 to 1 disadvantage. The armor, main cannon fire control system and reliability all SUCK compared to state of the art armor and fire control system of up-to-date tanks (and not just US machines).

[@antoniojohnson4654]

L3WG don’t forget all of Russia equipment and technology is outdated and not up to par

[@robovermeyer6674]

You said it multiple times but we also have quality over quantity and soldiers and warriors that want to fight and that wont quit. We're well supplied, well trained and well fed unlike Putin's pathetic excuse for a military

[@darcyjorgensen5808]

USA: Quality. Russia: Quantity. Our stuff actually works.

[@Michelle-j4k]

That's why other countries better get on the ball!!

[@Mbe-dm1pp]

Russia is not good ❌❌❌❌❌

[@terrioestreich4007]

It might not be good, ( personally I agree, how the people are treated is horrible) but I also wonder how much is propaganda from our government. Because they have to justify their own spending and actions, we need an enemy

[@sector986]

They have displayed themselves to be incompetent on their own in Ukraine dude

[@JustMe-dc6ks]

They had the third most powerful army in Ukraine for a while. 🤣

[@terrioestreich4007]

@@sector986 I was talking about the whole history, not just the Ukraine

[@robtintelnot9107]

Russia wouldn't stand a chance against us. 😊

[@Mbe-dm1pp]

USA IS THE BEST 💪💪💪👏

[@amyarchibald7319]

This was fascinating , thank you :)

[@JoeVanGogh]

2 thing you have to keep in mind 1) everything the US has its top of the line and everyone is buying them, we can barely make them fast enough, unlike the old Soviet junk 2) every person in the US Army is voluntary unlike Russia

[@blossomlizard]

These numbers are off. The war with Ukraine has depleted them massively.

[@Christopherg4224]

I like your channel man. Keep up the good work bro.

[@jburnett8152]

We have the best people 🇺🇲 ❤

[@M247]

Submarine= nuclear/silent powered vs diesel/noisy powered

[@LawNerdDebbi]

I seriously doubt either government has given up the real number of what they actually have! 😂😂

[@MSSW244]

I wonder if he would be interested in seeing how some American home owners just take their house with them when they move instead of finding a new home

[@kenyaswain1962]

I think Russia's reserve forces includes prisoners who can get reduced sentences if they survive.

[@josephshultz6659]

Also remember that if anyone attempted to invade the US the number of armed citizens

[@kippnashleymiller3752]

Obviously the channel did zero adjustments to Russia’s numbers from the war for the last two years.

[@chetlake3204]

Keep in mind that over the last 12 months, Russia has had 300,000 soldiers killed in Ukraine 🇺🇦. So, their active force is now roughly around One-Million, with a reserve total of more(if you believe them.. LOL) so, they claim they have 3.3-million total. Here in the U.S. we keep hearing that Russia is inflating their troop count. They do have more reserve troops, but mostly because they have mandatory service. While we (USA) don't have mandatory service. If, WW3 broke out and we needed more than the 2.1-Million (active and reserve total), we could reinstate the draft, but I wouldn't think we'd have to do that. We have an adequate amount or Air Force personnel, and Naval Troops that we would have the Air and Sea dominated. Also, keep in mind, when the B-21 Raider are complete and we have all of them in service, they're roughly half the size of the B-2 Spirit (Stealth Bomber) and the B21-Raider carries half the payload of the B-2. The B21-Raider is a Stealth aircraft that has the ability to be an unmanned Stealth Bomber. We have 100 of them in production currently, some are complete, but I'm positive as to how far along they are in production. But, 100 Stealth Bombers, controlled by an Air Force pilot sitting at a random military base. They guide the Bomber into position drop the payload on the target, and guide it back to a base to be reloaded and repeat. The manned aircrafts will not be fazed out. So, we will obviously still need Air Force personnel in the future, but the B21-Raider is going to be a wonderful addition for many reasons, but the most important reason is it will mean less pilots at risk of being shot down, or K.I.A. Also, the more B21-Raider air missions that we're able to deploy to strike selected military targets or person's, means less time that we have pilot's in the air, and less time we'd need boots-on-the-ground. Which all mean less time our military personnel are at risk. The B21-Raider is going to be a game-changer. So, we talked about controlling the sky. Now it's time to talk about controlling the sea. I think that most of the world is aware that we already dominate this particular division. We currently have 11 aircraft carriers and as of 2024, the most sophisticated aircraft carrier is the Gerald R Ford class of carriers of which we have three active and two more in production with two more on order after that. Each of which carry up to 100 aircraft. We all know that we already dominate the world's Oceans, but imagine what the U.S. Navy will be able to do when these massive super-carriers are done being constructed and enter service. We already have 85 Naval "Destroyers" or Surface Warships with VLS (Vertical Launching Systems) in service. We currently operate 470 Naval Ships, in both active service and reserve fleet. Of those, about 50 are due to be retired by the year 2028. But, as of January 2024. The United States has 95 new war ships in either the planning-stage or currently under construction. Plus, we have 12 new developed, improved-nuclear "Columbia-Class" Submarines currently under construction. These new Submarines are rumored to be so much more sophisticated subs, that much of their capabilities are currently a closely-guarded secret. These new subs are set to replace Ohio-Class Submarines of which the U.S. has 14 in active service. I guess, my point in this long-winded post, is we in the U.S. are not ready to even give any country a chance to catch up to any part, of any military branch any time soon. Lol Thank you for reading along. Have a wonderful night. ;)

[@miqoto]

US isn't counting anything that's in museums 😂😂 Also if want to see the post-Ukraine numbers 😂😂

[@richardmartin9565]

Spent 18 years as a "Cold Warrior" in the 70s & 80s. Got to see some Soviet equipment from defectors. Russian workmanship makes their "ilities" suspect. The "ilities" was our term for the quality, reliability, maintainability, and safety of their weapons. In my opinion, quality can compensate for quantity. I hate these videos. In reality, people die horrible deaths.

[@bryanpayton1168]

What this video doesn't cover is Russia's technical inferiority and their losses in Ukraine. Russia does not have the amount of tanks and artillery stated, almost half of those have been destroyed by Ukrainians with American weapons. Most of those are 40 to 70 years old, and many more are unusable except for parts. Russia's navy is at least 30 years behind the US technologically, and mostly cold war relics. Russia's submarines are a joke, the one that went to Cuba was missing many sonar absorbing panels. Ukraine doesn't have a navy, but has eliminated half of the black sea fleet, they're so incompetent most are hiding in Russian ports, hundreds of miles from Ukraine. Russia's air force is no match for the US either, most are cold war era, didn't you see them using GPS units taped to their planes while on missions in Ukraine? As for Russia's nukes, it's likely many are unoperational due to lack of maintenance. Don't believe everything you see on KZbin...

[@sierra-nana]

I'm sure that count on personal should be updated. Last news I heard said that Russia is losing about 1300 men a day in Ukraine.

[@nevysadventuresllc9074]

What you have to remember is Russia has lost a lot of equipment in Ukrainian war. Also Russian equipment is old where America is state of the art. I know over 300 tanks a lone almost 900 thousand troops.

[@perdidoatlantic]

You know what Russia doesn’t have? 800,000 solders lost in Ukraine.

[@Thetequilashooter1]

Just to put things into perspective. The US has given Ukraine just 40 HIMARS vehicles, and we’ve seen how much destruction so few have brought to the battlefield in Ukraine. There’s no way that Russia has that many functioning tanks when its soldiers are using vehicles, motorcycles, scooters, golf carts, and even bicycles on the front.

[@DartJedi]

This is the key, compare the transportation methods. One might have more troops and equipment but who is going to be more successful in transporting it?

[@RaymondMonk-f9d]

1.3 million fully volunteer soldiers… no conscripts! Russian military a large portion are forced service (conscripts)

[@thseed7]

I am interested to know if this video is pre-war in Ukraine or now. Confirmed numbers show Russia has lost 9,624 tank as of 24 December 2024 and more than and 20,000 Infantry Fighting Vehicles as of 3 January 2025. Moscow Mayor confirmed over 800,000 casualties for Russia just a few days ago as well.

[@stacydarlea6125]

In Russia, a male HAS to serve at least 1 year. The U.S. is strictly voluntary (tho it is required to sign up for the draft should it be needed).

[@zornanrichards]

If this was anywhere close to accurate, Russia would have won the war years ago. The satellite imagery for Russian tank storage only shows ~7500 tanks left, less than 400 are combat ready.

[@stevemadison6092]

I think the reserve force is not quite apples to apples. The reserve force shown for the US is for active reserves. This means National Guard and Reserves that actually train each month and 2 weeks during summer. A lot of the reserve forces in the US have combat experience in Afghanistan and Iraq. They are far better trained and equipped than many nations active duty forces. The US reserve totals did not count the IRR which is substantial. After one gets out of active service they still have a mikitary commitment to fullfill. This is in the ready reserve.

[@Sensist2009-k2k]

Hi

[@gigigennaro3303]

Who needs ground equipment when you have Air Superiority!?

[@VeraHuden-mj5bt]

Not sure how accurate the figures are right now. Russia is at war against Ukraine and have lost some of their equipment and manpower. USA has given a lot of equipment away and has sold some as well. Russia has men who have recent experience in warfare against American made equipment while American troops don't have experience against Russian made equipment. America has lost personnel to bureaucratic stupidity and has been teaching kids that America isn't worth patriotism through wokism. It is a different world today.

[@brent8133]

One thing I was thinking about while watching this is that Russia's reserves probably are legit just civilians with no capabilities being counted, just fodder if they need it. America would probably have the hardest civilian population to invade, without including the military. I also think American's hyper Patriotism would make way more/better people volunteer than Russia would drag from homes in a different manner. All I'm saying is these numbers are bloated by Russia (China is worse at doing this) and USA probably wins that category hands down, but Russia will look competitive due to counting people who aren't soldiers, all while common Americans who aren't counted have a weaponry of guns and operate them (and much more lol).

[@layrafaytel7219]

I wonder if this is from before or after Ukraine began turning Russian tanks into farm equipment 🤔🤔

[@JaMeYc420]

Russian navy is primarily coastal defense whereas the US has a true blue-water navy...

[@MJ19438]

1) Russia is built to win WWI. The US is built to win WWIII and beyond. 2) Quality > quantity

[@danadavis123]

Do these figures include the ones lost in the Ukraine war? Russia has very few troops left and the tanks, misses and aircraft are not as up to date as the USA's!!😮 😮😮

[@ThatGirlLib]

Russia doesn’t have the soldier count that we think it does, they obviously padded their numbers by the inexperienced drafted ones they sent to Ukraine.

[@aaronha994]

Antiquated equipment is a factor.

[@jennipei83]

The numbers do not equate to military power.

[@charlesbryson7443]

America has a distinct lack of volunteers currently.

[@dking1836]

Goes with a distinct lack of leadership at the top. That should change in just a couple of more weeks.

[@nannerz1994]

​@@dking1836weren't they going to get a Fox News anchor to run the Pentagon?

[@abigailracicot2957]

What I wanna know is how much of their equipment has Russia lost with Ukraine

[@josephbrann4792]

The first was total Air Force aircraft

[@Weeks25]

The Russians count everything they have whether it works or not. They don’t maintain their equipment very well and they use the cheapest parts possible. They also will come out with a new tank and act like they have a full stock of it but it’s never seen anywhere besides a parade. Our entire military is there because they choose to be not because they were conscripted. Our military is very highly trained as well. Because they don’t have the best training or well made quality equipment they throw as much as possible at whatever they are attacking. Whether that’s soldiers or missiles, they don’t care. Their favorite thing to do is send wave after wave of canon fodder. We have less but we can use it much more efficiently. Everything we have is in top working condition with the latest technology. If Russia couldn’t even hold air superiority over Ukraine that has barely any airforce or water superiority when Ukraine has literally no navy then how could they go toe to toe with us? The war in Ukraine showed the world they are not the #2 or #3 military in the world. They outed themselves as the paper tiger they really are. I would be shocked if even half of their nukes work. But all it takes is one to cause the end of the world. I

[@DerekRummerfield]

They should add citizens that own guns to the video

[@BuffyLynn]

I’m curious when this is because Ukraine has destroyed quite a few of each category of Russias inventory in recent years. 😉

[@mikesmith2102]

Quality and quantity are not the same thing. Also usage doctrine is a real thing. Russia is a regional superpower not really a global superpower like the US.

[@yetherapperreacts]

This video is an a perfect is a perfect example of quality over quantity

[@leviervin405]

They're still using tanks from ww2 as well. Their stats are very padded

[@RaymondMonk-f9d]

Most of Russian military equipment is antiquated as usa his the highest tech most accurate targeting than all..

[@JB-sv2ns]

Gotta remember Lewis, for every one front line troop, there are twelve supporting them. Not every active duty is on the line. Unlike other countries, our support troops also learn how to shoot.

[@chrisconny2285]

ruzzia has lost so much equipment since they invaded Ukraine, you can't pay attention to this video.

[@calvinmorris5975]

For the last 50 years or so who has done what and at what level. I know who im betting on.

[@johnfee1234]

I love the number to number. It makes me understand and question everything more. We will come together as a people❤

[@akita21154]

You have to remember that per capita Russia has a greater population . Plus quantity doesn't mean quality . America has quality. Our warriors deserve the best quality items available & they get it !! PROUD AMERICAN 🇺🇸🗽

[@ajay97005]

Russia has 146 million citizens… USA has 341 Million Citizens. More than double.

[@qc1651]

This must have been pre invasion of Ukraine.

[@Piaphamu]

Most of Russia's military equipment is really old.

[@foundingfarther]

6:21 these are more for transport troops in and out of battle

[@BillMartin-h2g]

"Bah-tol ships"🤗

[@RaymondMonk-f9d]

I think this inventory is pre Ukraine war….

[@douglascampbell9809]

The Russian numbers are off by a significant amount. Their losses in Ukraine are staggering. If anything this video is heavily Russian biased. A lot of their tanks in storage are wrecks. Then you have to add in the almost 700,000 casualties they have had.