British Couple Reacts to 5 Guns The Government Doesn't Want You To Have...

British Couple Reacts to 5 Guns The Government Doesn't Want You To Have...
Support the Channel on Patreon - / beesley
Movie Playlist - • Movie Reactions
Check out our Merch! - the-beesleys-merch-shop.creat...
P.O Box -
FAO: James Beesley
The Good Egg Farmers
P.O Box 19
JERSEY
JE4 9NH
Thank you so much for watching this reaction video!
Please smash that like button and subscribe!
Discord - / discord
Twitter - / beesleyyt
Original Video - • 5 Guns The Government ...
Comment below more reaction ideas or DM me on Twitter!
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

[@silikon2]

I can see how surreal this looks to non locals. "At the end of the day, it's nothing more than a modern semi-automatic sporting rifle."

[@EUSA1776]

The reactions are so funny. Whenever they show a cool gun he’s like “oof nice” and her jaw drops 😂😂

[@silikon2]

Yeah he's totally beaming. ;)

[@davidcosta2244]

That's because he's an FPS gamer, and does know some of the guns from games like Call of Duty.

[@tahliasgoddaddy]

Alot of people don't know the difference between fully-automatic and semi-automatic, and that's exactly what the media misrepresents.

[@coldandaloof7166]

Miss old Barry, RIP brother.

[@Rod-Wheeler]

These are anti-tyranny weapons.

[@altones1952]

That's why we have the Second Amendment 👍

[@Gantzz321]

against a DRONE, no they are not, they are TERRORIST weapons and that is all.

[@AniwayasSong]

'Tools'. ;-)

[@JohnZ556]

The "arms" are "weapons of offence, or armour of defence." meant to be used against both America's current enemies and future enemies, both foreign and domestic. Semi-auto, hunting, and sporting are only utility usage at one's discretion of the arms guaranteed by 2A.

[@JohnZ556]

@@torstenheling3830 Bless your complete idiocy soul, poor thing.🤠

[@cletus1n3]

We like things that go 'boom'.

[@timothybuchanan662]

That barret is for when the bad guy is hiding behind the refrigerator in the house three blocks away.

[@Charsept]

One thing about newer guns "looking scary" is: just like your phone or PC, technology never stops getting better. Your phone went from big and stuck on a wall; now it's light, small and in your pocket. Your PC went from a 1GB hard drive to 2TBs. Thousands of times more space. The same thing happened to guns. It was all heavy wood and slow. Now it's lightweight plastics and red dot sights, etc. Things naturally get better.

[@marksmith4892]

laser sights suck. They're always only accurate out to the yards you make them accurate because the path of the laser sight hypotenuse has to intersect with the line formed by the path of the bullet at precisely where the target is located or else the laser sight will be inaccurate. Training with tritium night sights is always best. I also think optics are not tactically advantageous in comparison to good old fashioned tritium or iron sights and what this illustrates is that all the flashy gizmos and cosmetics of so-called "assault rifles" amount to very little. In a real-life self-defense situation, basics are best.

[@Nick-sx6jm]

@@marksmith4892 Couldnt be more wrong. I dont know anyone who would put a visible laser on their gun today but the same logic applies to optics and iron sights. You zero for one range and if its closer or farther you have to adjust your aim point to compensate or dial it into the optic. Optics, night vision, IR, or thermal offer such a huge advantage that if you were trying to fight in a modern war and only had irons you would be dead pretty quick.

[@timmooney7528]

@@Nick-sx6jm There is a concept known as point blank range where you zero the sights (or optics) at a distance that will cover a longer range of distance. In the Army the M16 is zeroed at 25 meters, and that point of aim is good out to 300 meters. The bullet's flight path will rise and fall within that distance, but all your shots will fall within a hit box the size of a dinner plate. You're not shooting at a pin point or bulls eye. You're shooting at a larger hit zone. Same applies with a visible laser on a handgun. At the distance you are going to aim that laser, an impact slightly higher or lower is well within the hit zone. A set of irons sights can hit a man-sized target out to 500 meters. With a 25-300 meter zero you place the front sight post on the head of the target, and the shot will impact around the midriff. Optics make aiming easier because you don't have to align two points to be on target. A red dot or crosshair can be set at a "point blank" range to hit a target by merely pointing at it.

[@Nick-sx6jm]

@@timmooney7528 I know I used to shoot competitions and have been an avid hunter since I could walk. Tell it to the guy I replied to.

[@blancahoward4477]

Do not infringe is self explanatory

[@allengator1914]

So is the "to maintain a well REGULATED Militia" part that you seem to keep forgetting about.

[@sshimmy2258]

I live in North Carolina and one of my neighbors has a 50 cal that looks like the one the guy is showing off but painted black.

[@richardwirt3193]

I live on the east coast of N.C.

[@danhollifield]

You can buy almost anything in the US. Just before watching this video, I went online and bought 4 railroad cross-ties to use as a weighted foundation for a metal building, so as to keep the wind from blowing the building into the neighbor's yard, LOL! --Dan

[@seanfoltz7645]

Living in Orlando, I run into Brits and Europeans on vacation all of the time and whenever the discussion of firearms comes up - quite often since my dress and the bumper stickers on my truck scream gun owner - their reactions never cease to amuse me due to guns I take for granted and own being so far out of reach for them that they border on being magical. If you two are reading the comments, just as an FYI, other than the last gun, the other four were "dressed up" with all sorts of accessories and stuff to make them look far more impressive and "scary looking" than they actually are. The reality is that there's nothing special or extra powerful about any of them - the ammo they fire is no different than that of a hunting rifle or shotgun - other than the .50 at the end - in fact, some of the cartridges fired by them are actually too small to hunt game with in many states. For example, the AR15, which fires .223 or 5.56mm, is not legal to hunt deer with due to the bullet being so small - just 55 grains, or about 3.5 grams - it's a tiny bullet, the same diameter as a pencil or disposable pen and is actually classified as a varmint bullet, in that it is intended to be fired at animals no larger than a dog due to it lacking the size and weight to ensure a clean kill on something as large as a deer. As for the .50 at the end, there isn't a single incident of someone ever using one of those to murder someone or commit a crime due to the cost, along with the fact that the gun weighs in at around 25 pounds - just over 11 kilos - and as you saw, is almost as long as you are tall. Folks also don't use them for self-defense for the same reason, instead, these are long distance shooting rifles which folks either buy purely for fun/bragging rights or competition since it takes a considerable amount of skill and practice to hit a target at the 1-2 kilometer range they can shoot at - yes, that wasn't a typo - kilometer.

[@CollinKillian]

Never understood why gun owners use the "AR-15 fires a tiny bullet" as some form of reasoning as to why it's not "scary." The 5.56mm has considerable jules behind it due to velocity, sures it's a 22 caliber round, but that round is going almost 3K feet per second. It's more than adequate in its ability to kill humans, as I've personally done in Iraq and Afghanistan during my 10 year long military career as a Naval EOD tech. Regardless, I would absolutely in a pinch feel confident in it's ability to take down most game in America up to black bears with a decent 75gr soft point ammunition. I also believe it should ALWAYS remain plentiful in supply, and weapons that use it be easily and legally obtained without restrictions.

[@seanfoltz7645]

@@CollinKillian Because in America we can own a whole host of guns, thus we know that the AR15 does fire a tiny bullet - I own a .22 WMR and it fires 50 grain, so yeah, 55 grain .223 is tiny. Yes, the bullet does have a lot of power when you combine weight and velocity, but the problem is that most of that power is lost as it lasers through a target as we saw in Somalia during CQC. That's why the military adopted the 1911 in .45 - because a slower, heavier bullet which stayed in the target and transferred ALL of its energy was superior. Yes, .223 can kill humans - so can .22 long, .22 short and a ten stroke .177 pellet gun, in fact, for the longest time the .22 long fired almost entirely from revolvers (so-called Saturday night specials with 2-3 inch barrels) was responsible for more murders than all other calibers put together, as such, killing a human isn't all that high a bar for the .223 to clear. Kudos for knowing that there's more than just 55 grain ball and 62 grain green tip, but you're failing to mention that in order for a 75 grain round to be effective that it needs a 1:7 twist and ideally, an 18 or 20 inch barrel. Most ARs are cheap ones with 16 inch barrels and 1:9, never mind the low speed, high drag types who buy the AR pistols with 10 inch and shorter barrels, slap on a brace and then wonder why their "SBR" is keyholing past 50 yards and has a muzzle flash the size of a soccer ball - while those guns can fire the heavier grain bullets, they won't impart enough spin to achieve the accuracy/velocity necessary for them to be effective. So while my father and other men from his generation - all born in the 30s/40s - regularly talked about harvesting deer with .22 long and WMR, that no more makes those not-small rounds than the military adopting the .223 makes it anything but a varmint round. And to answer the question as to why the military adopted the AR platform in .223, it's because at the time the philosophy was quantity over quality of fire - get a low recoil rifle which had good range and shot straight and had light ammo so you could just give the soldiers lots of ammo and let them rock and roll as it was Vietnam and they had conscripts whom they didn't have time to teach how to properly shoot. With the concept of a draft appearing to be long gone, the military is abandoning the 5.56 for 6.8 and adding good optics to every rifle so as to do away with spray and pray and go back to accuracy of fire. So while I definitely wouldn't want to be shot by an AR, given the choice between that and a .308, 30-30 or 30-06, I'll take my chances with the AR.

[@CollinKillian]

@@seanfoltz7645 Dude, I spent 10 years in Afghanistan with my Naval EOD team, I'm American, own many ARs, and can assure you from personal experience that the 5.56mm isn't underpowered. The 5.56mm under 300yrds will almost universally fragment when it penetrates soft tissue, it causes ridiculous wounds and has excellent lethal effects on target. They chose the .45 based on boomer assumptions that heavy mass outperforms velocity, the US military went with the 9mm because frankly it was just as effective. If you think a 5.56mm just lasers through a target you've unfortunately never seen the effects on target, it doesn't it fragments and leaves far more than just a hole..

[@CollinKillian]

@@seanfoltz7645 Also they're not adopting the new 6.8 outside some use as a DMR round, they're still going to keep the 5.56mm as the standard round for the foreseeable future, as the standard ammunition for riflemen.

[@seanfoltz7645]

@@CollinKillian LOL, OK kid, you got me when you brought up the 75 gr but you gave yourself away when you went boomer on us - I take it the 75 gr 556 is a special power ammo on some FPS? For future reference, if you're going to pretend to have spent a decade in Afghanistan, you need to remember that someone who would do such a thing is old and worldly enough to respect the wisdom and experience of their elders, so while they will affectionately refer to them as old timers, or call them OG with a friendly smile, they would never use the millennial derogatory term "boomer." You would also know that the reason 9mm mags in full size pistols are all 15+ is because the 9mm didn't have the stopping power until the 90s when high performance ammo started being produced for it. Problem is that the military isn't permitted to use that high performance self-defense ammo, meaning 9mm ball today is no better than it was back when .45 ball was the way to go if you were stuck using either straight lead or FMJ. If you spent that long in Afghanistan, you would also know that a number of special forces guys still carry .45, in fact, there was what's effectively a 1911 racegun which was designed exclusively with them in mind and a number of them carry it. Being in the military that long, you also would have known about the problems in Somalia. And of course there's the rifling discussion, something you definitely would have engaged me in if the many ARs you own weren't all in video games and/or airsofts. So sorry kid, but you blew it on multiple fronts and levels.

[@AniwayasSong]

"In the U.K., we're not allowed..." Truly, you/everyone else in the U.K., have my sympathy... As an American Citizen/USMC Veteran, I grew up with firearms all around me. From hunting to put food on the table, to ranching (ie, slaughtering livestock), hobby/competition, it was something everyone around either participated in or were just enjoying from the sidelines. Gun 'Violence' in our community was non-existent, because everyone else KNEW they could defend themselves, and back then (I'm sixty years old, for context), the suicidal would just end themselves instead of committing 'Mass Shootings.' I can't imagine living life w/o having a 2A, and at this point in time, given all the BS our Govt., their 'Just US' System, and every one of their cutely named/titled agencies of our current Law ENFARCEMENT have done, are doing, and plan to do, next, I will never again give an inch/back-away from their Anti-2A policies/agendas. At this very moment, America has become exactly the kind of Govt. & 'Crew' our Founding Fathers told us to *NEVER LET HAPPEN.* That's on us. WE let things get this bad, and it's going to be one helluva task to restore America to what our Constitution and Bill of Rights mandates. Love watching your 'Reactions,' btw! Hopefully, if/when you get the opportunity to visit America, I hope you'll meet up with some good folks and enjoy some 'Range time'! I believe you'll have the time of your lives! :-)

[@CaptainFrost32]

Thank you for your service.

[@runrafarunthebestintheworld]

Only the military should have guns really. They should be allowed to carry a firearm even when they come back home to there families. No one is willing to say that though.

[@allenruss2976]

​@@runrafarunthebestintheworldgood thing our founding fathers didn't think that way or we'd still be colonies

[@philipbutler6608]

The US has the Second Amendment because many of its Citizens were exiled here from the UK during and After the English Civil War. British soldiers were quartered in American Homes. Colonists on the frontier were in constant warfare with Native Americans. The British couldn’t protect the Settlements. Colonial Governments couldn’t either. The American Revolution was bloody and some of the British Soldiers committed atrocities and the Indians committed atrocities. So it was natural that owning weapons was incorporated into the Bill of Rights.

[@allenruss2976]

Because that's an unconstitutional view ​@@runrafarunthebestintheworld

[@dgrayman87]

RIP Mr. Barry

[@MarcPagan]

From the USA - Per the Supreme Court (SCOTUS), no Arm may be banned unless it's both "dangerous and unusual". Which led to the "in common use test", as an Arm in common use cannot by definition be unusual. In the Caetano vs Massachusetts stun gun case, SCOTUS set the floor at 200,000 units nationwide. As there were more than 200K stun guns in the USA, SCOTUS voted 9 to 0 that Massachusetts stun gun ban was unconstitutional. Therefore any Arm with at least 200K units, or part required for an Arm such as a magazine, many not be banned. As there are more than 10 million AR-15s/semi-automatic riffles, and magazines holding more than 10 rounds, ...they may not be banned. An Arm per SCOTUS is anything that can be carried for offensive or defensive purposes. Therefore, bans on suppressors/silencers and body armor are unconstitutional, and working their way through the courts.

[@AniwayasSong]

'They' (ie, this Govt., their 'Just US' System, or any of their cutely named/titled Agencies of our current Law ENFARCEMENT), have *ZERO AUTHORITY to touch/'Infringe'/restrict/limit our 2A in ANY CAPACITY.* Period. The fact they have, do, and PLAN TO DO WORSE, only confirms 'They' are ignorant, arrogant, COWARDLY, incompetent, corrupt and traitors to our nation, Constitution and Bill of Rights. The fact 'We, the SHEEPLE' continue to comply, bend over/kneel down to them/their BS, confirms *WE* have earned everything they've done, are doing, and plan to do next. We get *(ie EARN)* the kind of society, govt. and nation we tolerate and enable.

[@brianphillips8228]

Per the preamble to the Bill of Rights, the Scotus ruling is wrong. It is wrong because none of the governments powers can be used infringe on the second amendment right. This test they pulled out of their ass and their ruling is unconstitutional. All guns are legal and always will be.

[@CollinKillian]

Thanks for the information, I was unaware that was the standard that SCOTUS had set for "unusual" arms..I do wonder if we'll see a ban on body armor, specifically level 4, as the government is sure to want a monopoly on the ability to have weapon systems that can defeat the average citizens capabilities..

[@weezerfan084]

I just want to thank you both for never getting into what you think should or shouldn't be in the U.S. One of the few channels that even when the video may be on a fiercely debated topic here in the states, I don't have to worry about having those arguments with randoms in the comments section.

[@brianphillips8228]

Everyone in the U.S. that is anti-gun should learn of the Battle of Athens, Tennessee in 1947. Perhaps they would understand that the battle was a textbook example of why we have a second amendment.

[@derpyeh9107]

And just look at who the bad guys were in Athens... ...Again. 😂

[@Zombie_Trooper]

I think there's a solid counter argument, and mind you I'm not anti gun at all. But the reality is why a civilian would need armor piercing rounds and guns that could take down elephants...kinda makes me wonder. It's a power statement above all others.

[@silikon2]

⁠@@Zombie_TrooperOf course it's a power statement. The vast majority of private weapons are never fired at a living thing.

[@Zombie_Trooper]

@@silikon2 Indeed, but allow me to reword my prior statement...power statement as in fragile ego needing to look tougher.

[@derpyeh9107]

@@Zombie_Trooper Civilians need them for when they're fighting non-civilians or civilians with body armor.

[@lightning77athiker45]

You never know when Godzilla will attack. We've been tricked by the Japanese before.

[@jasonallen1968]

😁😆😂🤣

[@torstenheling3830]

Good point. The invasion of the Godzilla monster. Lol 😂

[@RenlangRen]

I miss Barry. God bless.

[@jeffashley5512]

Barrett Firearms is right here in Murfreesboro TN about 20 minutes from where I live here in Murfreesboro. Murfreesboro is about 30 minutes SE of Nashville. I have been to see their display of the evolution of Barrett rifles in the past at the Outpost Armory.

[@torstenheling3830]

Must have been fascinating (snooze).

[@isabellegarza9070]

Let me just put this out for discussion. Each State has their own military and militia. The militia is personnel by the citizens of that state. So of course they have their own guns. The federal government that we have are violating our constitutional rights. They want to disarm our militia to control the citizens of every state. Guns are not just for hunting. It's to protect when living way out in the country. These people would have to police and protect their families and property. You call the police they might arrive in an hour.

[@derpyeh9107]

It's for protection when living in the cities and suburbs, too. Two legged snakes are everywhere.

[@h.s.lafever3277]

Alaska has both state militia, and state militia navy, however we can not mount weapons to the deck of the boats. tyranny!

[@isabellegarza9070]

@@derpyeh9107 🤭🤠✌️🖖

[@HidingFromStupid]

When I 1st moved where I live , the cops told me that I need to be able to defend my self and property because there is only 3 cops for 7500 Sq miles. They said if I call , they might show up in 30 min or 3 days

[@RUSSKIization]

most of us in the free states got these under the bed or within reach at any moment when at home.

[@tvc1848]

@@torstenheling3830 I am 68 years old and never needed an ambulance but I sure hope one is available if I do need it. My house has never flooded but I still have insurance just in case. Are you angry if a person carried a firearm for self defense for 30 years but never needed it?

[@RUSSKIization]

@@tvc1848 Well said. When seconds count the Police are only minutes away.

[@richardwirt3193]

One thing to remember we have a saying here in the south ( Guns don't kill people .People kill people )

[@nochannel1q2321]

I remember that one mass killing incident last week in the South where a person was unarmed and killed more than dozen people, injured more than dozen more and them off himself. You too, right? Since it's people that kill people, not guns?

[@tjhorne82]

​@nochannel1q2321 more people have been killed by hammers and knives than guns

[@nochannel1q2321]

@@tjhorne82 More people are killed by heart attacks than strokes. We don't just not deal with strokes because of it, though. Also what's the source for the number of knife/hammer deaths per year?

[@tjhorne82]

@@nochannel1q2321 natural cause vs unnatural causes isn't comparable

[@nochannel1q2321]

@@tjhorne82 The comparison being made was quantity versus quantity. Natural or unnatural isn't relevant to that.

[@LarryHatch]

You point an AR at someone who is threatening you on your own property....crisis averted unless they have a death wish.

[@daverichardson6817]

Love this! As teenager in high school in the 70s in a small town in Texas, everybody had a "farm truck" a pickup everyone had a .22 rifle & shotgun in a rear-window rack in plain view on hot days Windows rolled down a bit sometimes unlocked, during hunting season hunting rifles...NEVER had to worry about theft or a shooting! I love sport shooting handguns rifles & shotguns...especially the "scary" looking ones!😂😂😂😂 but remember big bore hunting rifles are more powerful than my "scary" looking ones! PS I really don't think anyone needs a Barrett 50 cal $12k & up price tag & after you fire one once that's enough! Love y'alls videos

[@CollinKillian]

Why do people have to quantify the AR-15 as not being as "powerful" as a hunting rifle? It's just as deadly, that non scary 22 caliber 5.56mm is just as deadly in practical effect on target as a 7.62mm at 300yrds and below. I know I've personally killed people with it during my time in Afghanistan. Not saying this as a justification for bans as I think both the weapon systems and ammunition should remain legal and freely available. Just find it a ridiculous point people always make on these videos..

[@timothybuchanan662]

I have an uncle that has a drum fed shotgun. He said you can make a man disappear with a gun like that.

[@suzz1776]

So here in California we have some of the strictest gun laws in the country, but we can have a cannon sent to our front door without any paperwork. Lol. I really want a cannon but they r sorta expensive and take alot of black power to shoot, plus trying to drag a cannon out to the desert to shoot would be a head ache. Lol. Btw, i am very pro 2a and think the only thing you shouldn't be allowed to buy is a nuke. 😊

[@georgea5991]

I would add things like nerve agent to the ban too, but I'm just being "that guy" 🤷🏻‍♂

[@randalmayeux8880]

Hi guys! Call me old-school, but I really love my M1 carbine. It's only about 3 feet long and weighes a little over 6 pounds. It's got sights adjustable to 300 yards, and is very accurate despite having a short barrel. I've got 15 and 30 round magazines loaded with 110 grain .30 caliber bullets, though because of Fish& Wildlife regulations you can only have a 5 round clip while hunting. It's a sweet little gun, especially good for walking up deer during the day in heavy brush, since it's size makes it easier to get off a shot without getting snagged in the vegetation. They're also very affordable, and ammo is cheap.

[@TheDripzzy]

By the way the 2nd amendment is not political it's apart of our countries definition. People trying to make amendments political are anti American.

[@JJ-wq9og]

RIP Barry

[@stevelacombe5291]

In order to take advantage of the capabilities of the .50 cal, you’ll also need a high quality rifle scope that is likely to cost a few thousand dollars. Not to mention that every round fired will lighten your wallet considerably.

[@tklarich4266]

The number one reason for the second amendment is to protect yourself from a tyrannical government. "THE BRITISH ARE COMING... THE BRITISH ARE COMING"!!!

[@user-po3ev7is5w]

actually we said the Red Coats are coming as WE were the British at the time.

[@stevem3605]

RIP Barry……

[@Blindy_The_Bat]

If you guys haven’t already I think a great video for you to react to is a video from Kentucky Ballistics on his 50 cal explosion, his story is wild and it almost killed him. He recently just hit his 3 year anniversary of the accident and he is doing much better.

[@philipsq6848]

The shotgun might be legal in the UK, with a firearms certificate. The 50 calibre would be if it was bolt action. 22LR rifles are more common though.

[@joecachia2]

As a gun owner in Europe , guns don't really impress me that much anymore. The only reason we dont normally buy guns of this type is because we dont have the facilities of where to use them, but we can still buy most of these. Full-auto is a no-no in most countries, but having said that, full-auto is not fun , and most of the time only used for supression , can't hit sh&*t in full-auto. Im not worried about a guy that has 200 guns at home, I'm worried about that guy that has 1 little gun only .

[@user-po3ev7is5w]

Gun ownership laws in Europe are as varied as the number of countries.

[@Refertech101]

In Canada they are all ways after the type 56 sks because the Natives like them, they're cheap, reliable, and puts meat on the table.

[@FuzzyMarineVet]

The United States gun culture comes out of English law. In the 15th Century Parliament passed a law that guaranteed that all English subject would be allowed to bear any weapon they desired when out in the country. When Britain colonized North America, it was virtually required that every colonist be armed with a musket for defense and a rifle and/or shotgun for hunting.

[@user-po3ev7is5w]

Also it was required under English law that all youths become proficient with the killer weapon of the time, the Long Bow.

[@andrewsims4123]

what the fuck has that to do with the USA ?

[@user-po3ev7is5w]

@@andrewsims4123 well, anyone with a grammar school level of education knows that the Founding Fathers of the USA were British and wrote the constitution based on much of the law from their home country. For example: this clause from the US Constitution was written BECAUSE of English law: "The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted." Anyone reading it who has at least a 4th grade reading level can see how that is Andrew.

[@andrewsims4123]

what about it ? i do know this already but that was a few hundred years ago !

[@mr44mag]

@@andrewsims4123 Ahh yes, the times have changed so you should have less civil rights argument.

[@NunyaBiznuss]

Just an FYI, alcohol kills approximately 3 times more people than guns annually. There is a good reason an 18 year old can't drink.

[@41italia]

18 years old is the drinking age where i am, but then again we don't have access to this type of weaponry.

[@NunyaBiznuss]

@@41italia I'm referring to the US

[@wtfdff17]

To the Beasleys, when you visit the US, if you come to Texas you are invited to come to my "shooting experience". You will be given the opportunity to learn about, handle, and shoot an assortment of firearms. I run a firearms training school where I teach new shooters. I'd love to have you as a guest at no cost. Your shooting experience will include some time in a classroom learning about the firearms and firearm safety, time onthe range to experience many different firearms, and a genuine Texas dining experience. All you have to do is accept the invitation and show up.

[@sector986]

This sounds fun. I have my own guns but would be down 😂

[@shadowangel3995]

The M1 Barrette rifle is in the same price range as my car.

[@aaronbarnes7783]

If you guys are interested in stuff like this, check out DemolitionRanch! He’s from Texas and does alot of stuff with Firearms

[@mrkoda3992]

Yall come to Houston Tx let me know. I'll take you to a gun range

[@Bradleehage]

texas lol go to Alaska they shoot guns better Alaska cowboys are the OG wild west people are in navada california i know cowboys from them states that are pro gun shooters they can shoot a baseball in the air with one shot shoot a stick from 20 feet a way. so they shoot better then yall texas folks.

[@garygemmell3488]

What so many people who do not understand our gun culture get wrong is that there are only two types of weapons: Automatic and semi-automatic. Automatic weapons, by default, are only allowed to be possessed by the government in America. Automatic means that when you press and hold down the trigger bullets continue to come out of the barrel. Semi- automatic means that only ONE bullet comes out of the barrell each time you press the barrel. Our minutemen kicked your British army out of this land using semi-automatic musket loaders. One trigger pull, one bullet. Every 20 seconds back in the day. Today's publicly available weapons are ALL semi-automatic weapons. Our gun culture can be DIRECTLY traced back to you Brits and King George III. We used the guns in the possession of our conscripted and volunteer soldiers to kick your butts off this land. Knowing that, our Founders made sure to enshrine that ability to kick another tyrannical government off this land again, if the need ever rose again. Government has a pathological fear of citizens with guns. Here in the U.S. nothing turns a cops bowels to ice faster than an armed citizen even when that citizen is LEGALLY armed. I respect your stance to be non biased and non political on the issue, but I think it is important that you know the facts. One of those facts is that more lives are saved every year by legal, responsible gun owners in the U.S. than those that are taken by criminals. You just don't hear about it because it does not fit the narrative held by our overwhelmingly anti-gun media.

[@blindlite5264]

Only thing I have to say is everything is right. Except the Automatic gun part. You can actually get some fully autos as a civilian but you need an insane freakin permit. An each gun is like 10k+ lol so really only rich folk can enjoy the full 2nd amendment currently.

[@moredistractions]

False information, you can own a wide variety of fully automatic weapons as a civilian in the USA. They're more expensive though and require more thorough background checks. Also, muskets are referred to as "single-shot" weapons, not "semi-auto".

[@mattrogers5994]

The IWI Tavor (I think 3rd) is made in Israel. Not the same company but this is the same weapon platform the UK and Australia uses just to put that into perspective. A lot of service guys are on the fence about the bullpup design. The US and Canada use the ar platform (first one).

[@tomhalla426]

Britain made being armed a privilege in 1900, when they required permits. The UK has no enforceable Constitution, as Parliament is supreme. The original intent was to keep the Labour Party and the Irish in their place, crime was not an issue.

[@steveyork8069]

It’s funny that an 18 year old can buy any of these rifles,but they can’t buy a pistol until they are 21.🇺🇸

[@jxstified7558]

I got my handgun next to me and the AR and my other handgun in the other room, Merica baby!

[@dougcates8169]

Started shooting when I was 5yrs. Started hunting when I was 10yrs, by myself at 14 and signed up for the USMC as a senior in high school. The Marines issued me a Colt 1911 and I have carried one from then on. I have upgraded the carry 1911, several times and the one I have now is state of the art and about 2500 bucks. I'm 63 and I have not ever shot anyone. I have drawn a weapon 6 times now, once in the line of duty and between my Brother and I we have stopped 2 murders and 2 burglaries. My Brother shot the tires of a thief's car 3 times and hit them and they were caught unharmed. It's different over here Ya'll.

[@g1mmedatdome284]

You are allowed to buy a gun in the UK actually. The registration and licensing process are just ridiculously extensive, and the laws make it so that gun in reality is not legally allowed to be used to defend yourself in any manner. Owning ANY firearm in the UK is similar to owning something like a silencer or machine gun in the US, most people think it's illegal, but really its just an insane amount of hoops to jump through to legally obtain them.

[@ChemicalShots]

It's not that extensive. It's a really simple process actually.

[@user-po3ev7is5w]

but the guns are crippled

[@beelzebudha666]

You can get guns in UK, yeah the regulations are strichter, but it is still possible to legally buy a wide variation of guns

[@russellbastion4315]

I thought if you jumped thru enough hoops, you could own shotguns in Britain.

[@USFirst1776]

You definitely should have a say and definitely should care because it does affect you. Your govt isn't allowing you to protect yourself and your family. That's bullshit.

[@robbieh.chafin6202]

I love our 2nd amendment

[@doublehockeystix]

shout out to all the patriots

[@alexanderfrangie5767]

You should check out Honest Outlaw

[@dvwgystyle2705]

hows the little one doin?

[@samuraishogun8395]

Better to have it and never need it, than to need it and not have it❤ from Texas😊

[@andrewsims4123]

why would i trust you not to kill me ?

[@samuraishogun8395]

@andrewsims4123 you shouldn't, you should get a gun

[@samuraishogun8395]

@andrewsims4123 I agree that you should not trust others with your safety. That's why I bought the firearm.👍 Every man and woman should use whatever legal means available to them to protect their family.

[@Scruffyman81]

Not being allowed to defend yourself DOES affect you. Go ahead, be brave, form an opinion.

[@Roh_Echt]

They are misleading when saying "the Govt" as this is only partially correct. There are those only from a certain party who all swear to defend our constitution, but then they repeatedly attempt to infringe upon our right to be well equipped to defend what infiltrators, a.k.a. domestic enemies, would swear to do but do not. Their opponent, on the other hand, does defend our constitutional rights and are not our domestic enemy. Those who seek to infringe, having control over education and media, will tell scary stories to urge their credulous supporters to give those they elect the power to infringe upon our rights. They do so to leave all to have those who will defend our rights less-equipped. Because it comes down to the citizens duty to protect all of our rights. Or as some are choosing these days; give up and are willing to hand over their rights...to be governed rather than hold on to our right to self-govern.

[@USFirst1776]

Politicians from both sides are anti gun and anti constitution. Just mostly Politicians on the left.

[@Kayla.burlin]

Hi y'all, hope you are having a great evening! From NY💗

[@arthurelliott-ds3eo]

I love my guns

[@Bradleehage]

we love guns in USA/America UK can have guns but they can only get guns in northern ireland and few other places but they need to jump through a lot of hoops to get the proper licence to buy a gun i think thats what i was told look up few things but the internet does lie.

[@tomdowling638]

Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Unalienable Rights from GOD. Not a Government.

[@richardmartin9565]

It's not politics the government has no authority to disarm the public. I dont own a gun, and if i did, the government wouldnt know about it.

[@blindlite5264]

They would if it were a pistol that you can conceal carry. A lot of states have registries and also anytime you fill out paperwork for a gun that paperwork is stored. So if your gun store doesn't have morals and balls that shit will get handed over to the feds upon request. Best bet is to buy one off someone private sale.

[@davidcosta2244]

Millie mentioned that one can buy a weapon at 18 years old, but can't drink. That's probably a good thing, since guns, and booze generally don't mix well together.

[@gregoriancatmonk6904]

Yeah, these people in that video you are watching are ridiculous, nobody needs those guns or 90% of the other ones being sold. Even if you are relying on self defense. Your house is very, very unlikely to be attacked by an army or anyone dangerous enough to justify those weapons. A squad of ex navy seals or special forces are not going to steal your stereo! I mean a 50 cal sniper rifle isn't a self defense weapon...it's nothing but an offensive weapon. I have a standard bolt action rifle, a shot gun and maybe a 9 mm pistol is all you need and the only reason you would need a rifle or shotgun is if you are hunting for food. (But you could probably get by with a crossbow for hunting)

[@sandrahalstead1770]

Thankfully, not all Americans feel the need to own guns like the ones shown. Every life is very important!! Too many guns fall into the possession of irate or mentally disturbed people. Innocent ones have lost their lives😢 I realize a disturbed individual could still kill others without using a gun, but they wouldn't be able to kill so many so fast. The America I grew up in didn't focus on guns. People focused on working and providing for their families, being good neighbors, and were proud to be an American. We used to be the country all others respected. Not anymore. Many Americans have become violent, selfish and lazy. May God have mercy on us because we are far from united. "UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL"

[@tabanderson5148]

First, not thankfully. Every American should exercise their rights. Even if you don't use it. Guns will fall into the possession of anyone who wants one. There are MANY illegal firearms out there. They have been shipped over borders forever and definitely as of late. America has always had guns. Even when you were growing up. Depending on WHEN you grew up, more likely than not, every household had a gun. We dont have a gun issue. We don't even have a "mental health" issue. What we DO have is an entitlement issue. What we DO have is a feelings over facts issue. What we DO have is issues with people not being able to handle NO or you are wrong. What we do have is people who can't handle even being told their shirt/shoes/hair/etc needs some attention. The issue is EVERYTHING is taken as bullying. The issue is EVERYONE takes everything as a personal attack. The issue is people think THEIR feelings trump ANYTHING else. The issue is NOONE uses the phrase sticks and stones anymore. We live in a participation award time. No one was taught to lose. No one was taught No. No one was taught VALUES, MORALS, INTEGRITY, and CONSEQUENCES. Guns and mental health are not to blame. Lack of instilling and implementing VALUABLE lessons is to blame.

[@deidrestevens9385]

You go through background checks before you can actually pick up your guns here in the US

[@justicar2747]

The U.S. oath of office for practically anything is driven by Article II, Section One, Clause 8, of the United States Constitution, as well as Article VI, Clause 3, to "be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution.". We have the Second Amendment to keep those people to their oaths, to prevent tyranny.

[@patgray5402]

You'd like some videos of Kentucky Ballistics. He has some very funny content!

[@DNHarris]

You need to do a reaction video to one of your earlier reaction videos. Double mouth cover-ups.

[@DUEYZ4U]

👍👍

[@jeffreyokrzynski8039]

Ummmm......yeah. You can buy it, although some stuff requires an ATF license or permit to own. Won't go into that.

[@jonathanfreedom1st]

Don't tread on me.

[@JonathanNewman-ht5vn]

It blows my freaking mind that the English cant defend themselves with a pistol????. like obviously im american iron toaten honor sentinel..i hear the knife crime y'all have u cant shoot. That's insane

[@user-po3ev7is5w]

Sure, one can buy it, that's why gun shops exist. To sell guns.

[@greghamann2099]

I am a gun owner, and I am not conservative. There are a lot of us. I think this gets too much attention. I am not triggered by all the talk. This is an old video and a bit outdated.

[@blindlite5264]

You must be libertarian, independent, or an older person whose what I could call the Old Guard of the Democrat party. Which are the democrats you can still have a conversation with. If you were liberal you'd cry at the sight of a gun and beg for more safe spaces.

[@greghamann2099]

@@blindlite5264 I was taught early in life to shoot and hunt and to know that a gun is a tool that has many legitimate purposes. That includes self-defense. It is legal and it should stay that way.

[@andrewchristopher7138]

Hi

[@timothykissinger4883]

When you go to America, you should try out a gun range.

[@arrobrewer2730]

.50 BMG $10 of more a round

[@417jumps3]

Every American should own 10 guns!

[@skipmaloney2126]

Thanks for reacting to things that are not part of British culture. Reacting to what is part of your everyday lives would be...boring. The BBC already has that covered.

[@williammecham7038]

quite an old video from Moss pawn and still relevant . the government would love nothing more than to leave us with torches and pitch forks . good thing for us the 2nd amendment restricts them not the people . we have allowed them to infringe a little and now they want it all .

[@cavlizzy]

Type of bullet matters too. I use Hollow Points in my gun. They enter about the size of a Sharpie marker, but “mushroom” & expand on entry & exit with a much larger hole! (Assuming there is an exit wound)

[@Sandman60077]

I find it annoying when pro gun videos say certain weapons like the AR15 aren't as dangerous as anti gun people say they are, but they never explain WHY they're not. Don't get me wrong, I'm pro gun and I understand why. I'm just saying if you're gonna bring it up then explain why so people can learn and know. Anti and pro gun people are like little kids arguing "Yes they are! No they aren't! Yes they are! No they aren't!" But nobody ever makes any points as to WHY they think the way they do.

[@TobyBaker-hz3rw]

Probably because any gun in the wrong hands are just as dangerous.

[@cpob2013]

Lol I have a flamethrower attatched to the barrel of my AR15 and its 100% unregulated because its technically not a firearm. I also got a 100 round double drum magazine for it loaded with armor piercing green tip rounds. All legal.

[@chrissihr1031]

Just because you *can* buy a gun like that in the U.S. doesn’t mean most people are inclined to. For the greater part of the population, guns are *not* a hobby.

[@ScottyM1959]

Let me preface this by saying if the antigunners had their way, there wouldn't be such things as starter pistols. Now, when we as brits came here and formed the colonies, we were all issued guns to hunt and, more importantly, protect our selvesand families from possible unfriendly natives. It turned out that the unfriendly we had to defend ourselves from were the british governors and their soldiers. As the problems got worse the people started stockpiling guns and ammunition until the shots heard around the world happened at Lexington and Concord and just like that, the American tradition and push for the right began. Today, even with all the world history, including your own, whenever a government takes guns away from the people, they then try to bully laws onto people they disagree with. Guns have been out of your culture but stabbings are out of control. Today it's one knife next it's a steak knife or chef knives. You can't legislate personal behavior because criminals are going to criminal. Trudeau did it in Canada and all of a sudden people are feeling more and more oppressed there by what I hear. Hitler did, Mussolini did it. Mao did it, and if we sit back and do nothing, they'll do it here, too, and that's why this video is titled the was it is. The government doesn't want us being as close as strong as the current infantryman. All of these rifles shown are SEMI automatic rifles. Which means each time you squeeze the trigger (1) ONE bullet comes out. His rate of fire on the one he said was 15 rounds a minute because you can feasibly pull the trigger that fast. You can get full automatic rifles if they were made prior to 1986 with the appropriate federal paperwork. What he didn't tell you about the Barrett 50 BMG is the ammunition costs a small fortune. So, not only do you need $12k-$13k to buy it but you may as well have about another $100k-$200k for training ammo and defensive ammo. And about $300 for ointment for that sore shoulder because I'm told those things kick like a mule.

[@Amocoru]

That's what freedom looks like.

[@h.s.lafever3277]

you two sitting stunned at normal american owned guns is classic...3 thumbs up, you guys rock 4:40 ish

[@secondlibertyfirearmstraining]

The video you're watching is very old. We have way cooler guns in the states now. Lol!

[@222aztek]

I would caution you to further reactions of these types of videos. It is very devisive and politically charged. Weapons of mass destructions are promoted in these videos. Please find other content to react to.

[@user-po3ev7is5w]

?? there wasn't a single WMD on this video. WTF are you babbling on about?

[@222aztek]

@@user-po3ev7is5w So dumb. If a weapon can injury more then one individual in a short amount of time, it is a WMD. Go back to OAN.

[@billchmelik5697]

Please read the second amendment to the US constitution

[@grumblesa10]

You CAN buy guns in the UK. There are over 4 million registered weapons. That is 1 per 16 people. Having said that , your position is very impressive and will keep you out of arguments in the US'n'A .

[@h.s.lafever3277]

people get all freaked out by guns, but people arent talking about the on going national tragedy of boating accidents and guns being lost in lakes, rivers, streams, and bogs...

[@sandylee9564]

The verbage used by these two has an underlying tone of contempt and criticism...that's all I'm going to say. These weapons do look bad A$$. I wouldn't even want one in my house even if I was surrounded by hungry wolves. LOL

[@TobyBaker-hz3rw]

And you have the right not to have one.👍

[@blindlite5264]

You're more than free to make that decision. As veteran and a pro constitutionalist I would ask that you also respect my right and don't try and tell me I can't have any of them because YOU don't want them. If you can do that then shit I don't think pro 2a folks would have any beef with ya. The left might hate you for not being anti gun but hey lol.

[@jodyarrington8555]

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right to keep and bear arms. It was ratified on December 15, 1791.

[@eileenderheim3768]

i do enjoy your videos and have followed for some time . However, I personally find it bothersome that you state you have no opinion on guns in the USA, yet continue to promote guns in your videos. I realize many followers are encouraging but gun violence is a serious issue in this country.

[@ginao8935]

At no time do they “promote guns”. They are a reaction channel. They simply watch a video and then give their opinion on said video.

[@holyfire11]

Milly is my soul animal