Certain minute descriptions about the structural analysis exposed in Abi Dhamma Pitakaya in regarding the reality of the Universe being preposterously absurd and profoundly abstruse even to the modern scientific research evidence known through the latest space telescopes thua it would have been better to learn about the Structural hypothesis rather than claim "lost in horizon" in that field.😮😮😮😮😮!
@suranimalajayasinghe738410 ай бұрын
Dont the modern researches Come closer to grasping an intelligent creator ?
@milindudilanka857410 ай бұрын
@@suranimalajayasinghe7384 Nope. It would be impractical and it leads to bigger questions like how the creator got created.
@suranimalajayasinghe738410 ай бұрын
@@milindudilanka8574 That is dependent on the fact how you define the creator. As we do not speculate on the origin of nature, creator could be defined as nature itself and nature as creator himself which includes spacetime and energy. Then that question would be similar to be asking when did the nature got originated? and how was it originated?
@milindudilanka857410 ай бұрын
@@suranimalajayasinghe7384 In Christianity, god isn't the nature. He depicted as a originator being who lives outside the space time continuum.