Buddhism - Yogācāra School

This Lecture talks about "Buddhism - Yogācāra School"

[@dan-3268]

Easy to follow. Very clearly put. Thanks!

[@tenzinkhandro]

You are the best Buddhist teacher.

[@vartikananda76]

You speak so beautifully.

[@arvindtayde3879]

very good explanation...nothing added.....true....please continue with original ...you are better than all others....i have studied and heard

[@mikec6733]

I have another argument that Vasubandu could use in response to the time-space determinants challenge... When it appears that many persons are observing the same thing at the same time...those other persons that I see co-observing the thing along with me ARE ALSO ONLY PROJECTIONS OF MY CONSCIOUSNESS. And, at the root, there is only ONE consciousness...which manifests or appears to be many...My consciousness, Your consciousness, etc.

[@ngawangjigmedh]

hey there are some text where Nagrajun restrain some thought of Yogacharya school. Do you still think Yogachrya came after Nagarjun???

[@georgekuttygeorge8247]

Excellent explanation 🎉

[@JDPlaylist]

Brilliant

[@paldensherpa5821]

Thank you

[@vishy89]

Madam, is there a video on Trimshika ? Thanks

[@Graviton-cc9bn]

This school later evolves and blossoms as kashmir shaivism.

[@Jagadish.N]

Please, upload Income Tax In India. we will be wait.

[@prernabhardwaj461]

Ma'am yogacharya is not from madhamika

[@siddheshwarsurnar9358]

Yes. Mādhyamikas are sunya-vādī (nihilists)

[@SurajKumar-vw7pj]

Yogcara school of buddhism is similar to 3rd level reality of shankracharya. From 3rd level of reality (parmrthik) every object of this world seems unreal, here only brahm real. (Ex - rope is absolute unreal) thus it holds theory of Idealism But from 2nd level of reality - these object have existence, they are real (Ex - rope as rope) Thus it does not hold Theory of Idealism but holds Realism From 1st level of reality (pratibhasik) Here sense of illusion seems real (Ex - rope as snake) Thus it does not holds Idealism and Realism both. By BIHARI villager who don't have degree in philosophy but read it due to interest.

[@ludwigwittgenstein9413]

Which books you read ?

[@arvindtayde3879]

shankara was/is known as prachanna Buddha......a Fake Buddha ....who copied and contaminated the four schools......7th 8th century

[@Flaytt744]

nice ..but Maitreya was NOT a contemporary of Nagarjuna, but a Bodhisattva figure.

[@karanagrawal8499]

He was as Maitreya Natha.You can see in wiki

[@Flaytt744]

The "mind" that Vasubadhu , spoke of was not "there". To begin with. Nagarjuna got it right.

[@marshallmathers4738]

Why cant these Indian pronounce Sanskrit properly. Its Maitreya and not Metreya..