“We got dumpstered game one, then we sideboarded and won” The authentic Bosh Bant vs Storm experience
@John_Doe742Күн бұрын
Bosh and Roll = B&R B&R = Banned and Restricted Bosh and Roll = Banned and Restricted
@BoshNRollКүн бұрын
It's the transitive property. Can't argue with math.
@paperskate654Күн бұрын
27:15 delightfully devilish mr Bosh
@jaredschroeder7555Күн бұрын
Read this in a James bond style voice lol
@artist91fbКүн бұрын
“Zenith gets me ‘herder’” - that’s what maverick players say during lovemaking 😂
@ecpracticesquad4674Күн бұрын
A lot of people agree that Wotc shouldn’t be spoon feeding new top archetypes straight into the meta. *cough* Boros energy *cough*
@janmelantu7490Күн бұрын
Worst part of Boros Energy is that it doesn’t even play any of the cool Energy cards from Kaladesh block besides Aether Hub
@emctwooКүн бұрын
Wotc also really doesn’t seem to understand that it’s actually much less interesting to build/play pre-designed archetypes where they’ve already planned most of your deck for you at the printing press.
@pokeyclawz8727Күн бұрын
How dare new cards be playable, i only want izzet delver to be the best deck for the next 20 years
@fernandobanda5734Күн бұрын
The last time they tried to improve archetypes, it didn't matter. It's understandable that they'd push a bit more, but then it's just those cards. So what's the solution? Only print generic cards? Continue printing Energy cards until they're slowly relevant?
@fergusfisher1315Күн бұрын
Legacy and modern are looking like MH3 set constructed at this point.
@Dhips.Күн бұрын
20:38 Island, Ponder, Pass. "An elegant play for a more civilized game."
@moody-BayonettaКүн бұрын
Love your videos man, thanks for posting so frequently
@knightofthesun2595Күн бұрын
We need a power crept bolt that does 10 damage if it targets a bird
@33_plus27Күн бұрын
We have that card in green, its called run afoul (doesnt target nadu too!)
@slowlylosingitaaaaaaКүн бұрын
Make it do 20 damage if it targets a player that plays cards printed after 2018
@googleplusisterrible4837Күн бұрын
I’ve been waiting for someone to start working this out
@Toaster_BardКүн бұрын
New bosh video, hell yeah!
@janmelantu7490Күн бұрын
What if we called this deck Birdsong? It is Nadu+Chord
@googleplusisterrible4837Күн бұрын
100
@Zzod0000Күн бұрын
Nadu + dudes=nadude
@StoneAgeDudemanGamingКүн бұрын
I like Songbird a little more, but I'm in your neighborhood at least
@eduardo96619 сағат бұрын
Hello! Your content is great! I love playing elves since forever hahaha 48:10 I guess zenith for Halfling was the play. What do you think?
@baxter7407 сағат бұрын
11:35 caught me off guard lmaooo I don’t know if this was referencing O.P.P or if it was referencing Without A Face but either way it got a laugh out of me
@StoneAgeDudemanGamingКүн бұрын
I vote we call this iteration: Songbird.
@JonBender3Күн бұрын
I think it would be a service to the community to review priority in combat particularly as it relates to frog and jumping after declaring attacks. As a "slower" player in general, twice now I've attacked with a frog with the intention of holding priority and jumping when my opponent blurts out BLOCK HERE, and it is awkward. I hope this doesn't happen to anyone at eternal weekend.
@BoshNRollКүн бұрын
In attacks but before blockers is a phase that exists but nothing usually happens there. As the player doing the weird thing, I would announce all of it at once. You “Declare attacks?” Opp “Ok” You “I’ll attack with my frog, and jump it before blocks.” If you announce attacks then indicate a priority pass by pausing and looking at them, they actually can just pass priority too and they’re in blocks.
@SoldeviDiggerКүн бұрын
10:08 You even had one mana to spare by evoking Endurance
@martenhedin9709Күн бұрын
It should be called Bant Herder!!
@muphinnpКүн бұрын
RAAAAAH CONTENT RAAAAAH
@Zii_ViiКүн бұрын
Opp 3 is a real one 😎
@artist91fbКүн бұрын
No mad? Yes mad!
@sorin_markovКүн бұрын
42:29 is it better here to put their Daze back in or to shuffle your own Chord back in? I don't see that Daze does much for them in their graveyard except Frog fuel and you are currently topdecking for an out. It's a minuscule percentage difference either way Edit: actually since you'd also be shuffling in two junk hits, the fraction is almost the same. 10/46 hits vs 11/49
@ghnami1352Күн бұрын
I'm wondering why not craterhoof behemoth instead of emrakul here. Craterhoof is a way to win through large mana generation and a single chord/zenith without nadu being present, it provides a win in a way similar to emrakul where it is an uncounterable lethal threat that doesn't require you to pass the turn (since you'll have ample time to play the shepherd in the combo), and it pitches to endurance.
@fergusfisher1315Күн бұрын
Im guessing that the reasoning is the craterhoof win is beaten by a single removal spell or counterspell (if it’s counterable), whereas the emrakul win with a big enough board wins through removal or counterspell.
@ghnami135215 сағат бұрын
@@fergusfisher1315 I don't think you fully understand the nadu loop. Also this deck plays sylvan safekeeper so removal isn't an answer.
@fergusfisher131512 сағат бұрын
@@ghnami1352 I don’t think I’m missing anything with the infinite loop, I know how it works. You’re right about the sylvan safekeeper shroud though, maybe craterhoof is better in light of that.
@lukeneslen34123 сағат бұрын
Both win you the game with effectively infinite mana, immunity to creature removal, and counterspell immunity. The advantage emrakul has going is that it isn’t an ETB trigger in a format with Stifle-naught, and hedges against mill (but mill is pretty narrow)
@RumpledNutskinКүн бұрын
What are your opinions on this build of Nadu compared to a ponder/brainstorm/force of will bant build? I know I want to play Nadu at Eternal Weekend, but I'm not sure which build is "best"
@HitzelКүн бұрын
What's the outlet to the combo in the paper version without Emrakul? Does it exist in the list or does the paper version sneak in some incidental ways to use the infinite mana without passing turn?
@cowisiontv6611Күн бұрын
In modern it was usually otawara plus boseiju, bounce every nonland and destory every land, i guess in legacy you can do the same
@HitzelКүн бұрын
@@cowisiontv6611 How do you recur the channel lands? Nadu puts them into play with the Endurance loop, yeah? The simplest change to this video's list I can think of that works is including a Yavimaya so you can make copies of Quirion Ranger to bounce any number of lands indefinitely.
@rob3681Күн бұрын
you use waterlogged grove to draw rhe channel lands.
@dawsonscreep456612 сағат бұрын
uncounterable chord for endurance in response to reanimate?my bussy is quivering
@JamesObscuraКүн бұрын
Is this combo a demonstrable loop? It kind of sounds like 4 horseman where you cant say what the board will look like when you finish so you cant loop
@mike1313132003Күн бұрын
It is demonstrated because you can pack your library with only the lands you want w/endurance and sylvan
@BoshNRollКүн бұрын
It is a clean loop.
@olazawhoКүн бұрын
It's only past a certain point where it's actually demonstrable right? You either have to have already looped your whole library such that you know the remainder, or have a number of available Nadu triggers greater than the number of cards in your library if not. Unless I'm missing something? (Which is exceedingly possible)
@fergusfisher1315Күн бұрын
@@olazawhothat’s true but the steps before that aren’t loops, they advance the boardstate, so they aren’t slow play or non deterministic loops, so it’s allowed. The infinite combo is mostly there as an easy endpoint to reach towards that definitely wins. Even eggs in modern, a famously wheels spinny deck, technically had an infinite combo to end the game eventually, it just took a 20 minute turn to reach that point
@music00sobaКүн бұрын
BOSH PACK 🦅🦅RAHHH BIRD NOISES IF YOU 🫵GOT EM 🦅🦅CAW CAW CAWW
@dm1004Күн бұрын
So if it's a simple explanation in paper why did it need banned in modern?
@BoshNRollКүн бұрын
It was not banned for being too complicated, it was banned for being insanely broken and difficult to interact with.
@LucksackGamesКүн бұрын
@@BoshNRollpersonally, I think that's the best metric to use when banning something.
@bradleytinney6969Күн бұрын
First!
@michaelmeade4767Күн бұрын
imo the beseech combo piles like you played in R1 are the lamest decks in legacy
@austinmullins8051Күн бұрын
Eh it keeps decks honest with interaction
@TheAntColonyКүн бұрын
Hard disagree. I've never played storm but think it's really cool and happy it exists in the format
@drpibisback7680Күн бұрын
@@TheAntColony The Epic Storm is an incredibly cool deck. Beseech + Gaea's Will makes for clean and easy lines, but the deck's resilience against interaction and the sheer number of possible lines - it's no basic "do or die" A-B combo deck.
@DracomandriuthusКүн бұрын
43:44 Leave Dryad Arbor back, activate Allosaurus Shepherd with all your mana. You get 2 5/5 shepherds, you dont lose to bowman