CAN 20.000 WW2 ARMY STOP 2 MILLION ZOMBIES - Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2

[@CaptainCigar]

Don't forget to subscribe guys. 😅

[@drstevea.k.awideloadbabymc64]

How strong was that last zombie?!

[@flamechicken415]

now do 2 million zombies vs 2 million zerg swarm

[@shanelogan630]

Man what was the outcome? How many survivors I mean out of the 20,000? That’s be the start of a legend for a movie!

[@CaptainCigar]

@@shanelogan630 counter on top right.

[@johnnygoodman2003]

The next question is can a 20000 WW2 army stop 2millions hipster douch bags armed with Starbucks cappuccinos?

[@davidroberts6549]

Much impressed by the organisers of the zombie army. That must have been a heck of a job to administer a Whatsapp group of that size.

[@stonedtemplepilot5]

😂

[@codykelton1384]

These flash mobs are getting ridiculous

[@joma0305]

Its okay. Just 5 telegram chats would be enough

[@alberto5770]

It was not wassap, was the twitter channel of Brandon voters.

[@theheretichammer]

@@codykelton1384 *Flesh mobs

[@PladimirVutin]

In a position like this... Most Soldiers will die from friendly fire 🤣🤣

[@lamyoongkit]

I can hear soldiers.... "Medic! Medic!" "Reloading!" "Ammo! I need ammo!" "Hold the line!" "Mama! Mama!"

[@mattmuslim]

Saving private ryan 😅

[@redspace5410]

BF4 UNITS

[@sambalpenyet]

I heard, "FBI open the door!"

[@rafaelcapili8890]

Im on the run!! 😂😂😂😂

[@Typhoon1515]

I would call a fucking airstrike

[@vlogbrothers]

That one zombie at the end thinking he was going to punch a tank is an inspiration to us all. -John

[@kristofferhellstrom]

😂😂😂

[@leonestello]

21:47 You're Welcome 🤗

[@tanmayraazpradhan9235]

😂😂😂

[@onealmr]

I aint gonna lie...I really thought the zombies would win that fight. Those brave men of the 217th Zombie Attack regiment really held their ground. Thank you for your service! 🤣

[@jonathansibay2431]

You're not alone here. 🤣

[@atticman4275]

I salute all brave soldiers of the 217 Zombie attack regiment for their service😂

[@careliacarelita2294]

Qué sentido tiene exponer a la infantería al frente, teniendo esa cantidad de tanques?. La línea de tanques debe ir al frente, formando un muro inexpugnable, con ametralladoras intercaladas entre los tanques, con los fusileros detrás, a distancia, para acabar con los pocos zombies que logren penetrar la primera línea de defensa...""🤔

[@i.r.Buzz_Saw]

They weren't POGs

[@Absolut531kmh]

Those zombies might be female too y'know XD

[@timzilla94]

My Graphics Card: "Hehe I'm in Danger!"

[@robertzalman4333]

Rtx 3090 is down?

[@Stoudtminer]

Same. I have a TV for a monitor as well so it sucks.

[@PetraAndTitoShouse]

Emotional damage

[@marslowell3992]

Okay Ralph Wiggum

[@sakrine]

You guys have graphics card ?

[@wisenber]

The zombies appear to have better battle tactics than the WW2 army that looks to be forming a line more suited for a Napoleonic battlefield.

[@FabricioNMN]

The WW2 Army are setted just to defense, they don´t move.

[@wisenber]

@@FabricioNMN That wasn't even a decent defensive formation.

[@channingtaintum]

Same tactics as the Soviets at Stalingrad. Throw bodies at the enemy until they dont have any more bodies to throw back at you.

[@plopdoo339]

Why were the tanks behind the infantry?😂😂That made no sense to me.

[@swampheights]

Поддерживаю 👍

[@__somnii]

What I'm struggling to wrap my head around is that the zombie side could be thought of as a rough visual representation of the people that died in the battle of Stalingrad. Like I always knew 2 million was an incomprehensible number of deaths in a battle, but this really hammers home the absolute atrocity it was. The scale of loss is incredible

[@jackburton7062]

There is a video on KZbin that breaks down all the military and civilian deaths of ww2. It is truly hard to comprehend. The soviet count was staggering.

[@Drew-od4dh]

@@jackburton7062 linky?

[@jackburton7062]

@@Drew-od4dh type in The fallen of world War 2. Its the best one.

[@benztruck1936]

Ukraine is showing Russia does not give a fuck about it’s men.

[@__somnii]

@@jackburton7062 yeah I love that video, super well made

[@davidpaxton6402]

Can we please have a minute of silence in memory of the 10,352 troops that lost their lives at the Battle of the Zombie Apocalypse... Lest We Forget! ✝

[@jccuchvjvj]

No. They were Germans.

[@einfachabsurd3757]

@@jccuchvjvj may i ask, where are u from?

[@jccuchvjvj]

@@einfachabsurd3757 Soviet Union

[@naveen.1]

@@jccuchvjvj 🤣

[@einfachabsurd3757]

@@jccuchvjvj interesting

[@BoostedR130]

This was really cool. But after seeing the unlimited ammo, no reloading, and no friendly fire it looked highly likely it would have been nothing but tanks left in short order.

[@winstonsmith6166]

AND weapon barrels with unlimited life which did not burn up.

[@yakov95000]

If you want to go realistic,it would probably be couple of seperated bunker position not a line with "Death zone" and wall/fences and trenches and machine guns in much larger numbers,so yea it is not all realis.

[@aaronschultz7510]

Yeah the totally realistic zombies were definitely cheated by the unrealistic unlimited ammo, and non overheating guns. Lmfao.

[@ireallyreallyhategoogle]

Except THOSE zombies can apparently claw their way through a tank's armour.

[@jackfredricks6223]

@@ireallyreallyhategoogle And sprint through PILES of dead bodies better than a running back from the NFL.

[@bellcrosswolfstein1942]

Now i know why soldiers still lose in zombie apocalypses. If this was real, those soldiers would have run out of bullets at their 100k kill.

[@ugastronomie1237]

But would have dug trenches, set barriers on a strategic position

[@Alex.ushakoff]

If this was real, zombies can't inflict any damage to tanks.

[@bellcrosswolfstein1942]

@@Alex.ushakoff but the tanks won't be able to do anything once it runs out of fuel and ammo. The soldiers will die inside there. And i doubt it can also run perfectly without any issue once it has trampled upon thousands of thousand of flesh and bones.

[@FeeDBacKMKII]

@@bellcrosswolfstein1942 Yes it can cause its on chains its not like a car and can stuck also a human body is squishy and has almost no resistent against a many Tons heavy Tank Tanks would absolutly Grind them to shreds

[@duddude321]

If it was real they would have artillery and air support as well as a dedicated supply chain. The tanks would also be able to drive through and over any number of zombies.

[@MensHominis]

My heart goes out to the lonely platoon remaining of that frontline section at around 8:00, fighting its last stand. 😩

[@AndrewGame77]

Lucharon hasta el final como hombres 😢❤

[@ALLROY240]

The soldiers were extremely brave to hold their lines.

[@tuco86x]

Much braver than I

[@downs9724]

They were Soviets, they had no choice...

[@Edward22050]

@@downs9724 Order No. 227: "Not a step back!" by Joseph Stalin

[@linomarques4523]

sao camicases, ..Vão morrer para que o carros atraz sejam salvos,,Ops , nao deveria ser ao contrario;

[@CaptainMoroni19]

Helps if you have unlimited ammo

[@NY_7]

Pretty cool! If only the tanks could've shot shell's that explode while driving around and running over zombies, the battle would've been won a little quicker.

[@ireallyreallyhategoogle]

Except THOSE zombies can apparently claw their way through a tank's armour.

[@ABSiddekAnik]

@@ireallyreallyhategoogle Those are zombies not wolverine

[@AustinCDennis]

@@ABSiddekAnik Watch closely and you'll see the zombies kill the tanks. It's not as quick as killing the infantry but the tanks take damage.

[@ireallyreallyhategoogle]

@@ABSiddekAnik Look at the tanks getting destroyed.

[@Sam_COD]

Nah bro these soldiers supposed to die long time ago like they were inside the herds

[@genioocampo8275]

Note to self…never let 2 Million zombies assemble in an open field without air cover.

[@jeremycheong8036]

Few problems: 1) Rifles overheat 2) Bullets will cross paths 3) Zombie should have turned some of those soldiers 4) Usually, undead doesn't go down in 1 hit.

[@jaredchampagne2752]

Its a video game

[@leakoe3797]

Well Who won....?

[@fegemarsilang5746]

Another problem is how the hell do the humans have a horrid tactic, they could've curb stomped all those zombies if they just spearheaded with their tanks at the front and Infantrymen providing supporting fire while the tanks just now down the zombies

[@philipjeanmard6056]

The army taking up positions behind the body of water at their rear would have slowed the zombies. Not to mention gunships…

[@ryzenforce]

75% of the bullets are shot in the air. Tanks behind troops. No funnel. Of course you'll have casualties on the Army side. With that many tanks, you could just removed the troops and let the tank run and squash all 2 millions zombies without a single shell fired.

[@pffa9675]

Tracks will get busted after running over like 100 zombies, with blood, shattered bone fragments and tissue. and there's 2 million

[@brandonschooner8298]

no trenches no redoubts, no tank enplacements or earth works. no barbed wire or firing positions, nothing defensible. Just people in a line its weird and dumb

[@OneWhoKnowsThings6009]

You dont know what realism is do you? Tank treds weight alot.. Takes alot to bust a track off..

[@ryzenforce]

@@pffa9675 Tracks roll and crush rocks, so just imagine what they would do bones and flesh. The soil itself is more resistant than a human body. It takes a lot to bust a track that run in straith line - like a mine.

[@ronrico2620]

The tanks just driving would be a whole new dynamic. The ww2 would have had way less casualties

[@kong.615]

I salute to all these brave soldiers for not even running away, they stand their group 😆😂😂🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭

[@louly3212]

Yea the computer one, solid. Though you might see a bitch nigga.

[@antoineverso9579]

The tanks had to be placed in a solid first line of defense, and the infantry had to cover them from the flanks and behind.

[@votpavel]

no reload at all....kinda lame

[@VictorManuel-pf7se]

Russian spotted

[@TheMooseRooster]

If enough zombies run at a tank the space it exists in doesn't exist anymore.

[@similaritiesendhere]

@Samuel Howard. The whole point of tanks is that they can mow thru infantry without even opening fire. There is no difference between running over 10 people and running over 1000 zombies. They're just mud under tank treads.

[@richmerowitz5610]

I disagree herr Field Marshal. The armour should split into two co-ordanated pincers to crush the zombie vermin in a vise. We must take this matter to the Furhrer immediately for his ultimate decision.

[@snake852002]

one of the most random yet most epic thing I've seen on youtube

[@ODST_Parker]

It's funny how ridiculously one-sided this looks until you realize the zombies lost 95% of their number to kill 50% of the Americans.

[@ranch4683]

MERICA FUCK YEAH

[@hhhfg4738]

@@ranch4683 что ?Ахах

[@carpediemarts705]

Well the fighting effectiveness of the soldiers reduces significantly when they get flanked, when there's a body berm, or once the line breaks. Once the zombies breached the front line and flanked both ends, I thought the soldiers might have lost. Their numbers fell very fast at that point. If at the end the soldiers at the right weren't finished with nothing local to shoot at and doubled all the firepower to the left flank, the zombie horde could have easily swept through the left side. Same fight with 250,000 more zombies and I think the soldiers would have failed.

[@dovahbear0]

@@carpediemarts705 also when most the shots are over the heads of the targets.

[@carpediemarts705]

@@dovahbear0 I've mentioned that in comments. If it wasn't an estimated 40% of the shots going high it would make a huge difference. If those high shots fell like real bullets, that would make a huge difference. If friendly fire killed allies, well the game would be useless. Can the devs send a patch for the AI to have them NOT aim at the sky 40% of the time?

[@thegreatreverendx]

Airborne strafing and bombing would be more cost-effective. If ground troops had to be used, you’d put the line of tanks in front to mow them down, and you’d use the infantrymen to clean up the rest, and they’d be in secured positions such as concrete towers, where they’d have line-of-sight advantage and from where they could be air rescued if they were overwhelmed. It wouldn’t be necessary to shoot all the zombies at once, just the first few lines, and their demobilized bodies would serve as obstructions for the rest. The obstructed zombies then could be targeted easily.

[@o3941]

For the cost of 1 A-10 strafing run, you could probably put a gun in 500 soldiers hands and kill 50x as many zombies. Tanks would be far more effective. As you said, put them in a row, add dozer blades to them, and just drive over them. They're not going to get into the tank, so the crews are entirely safe. The only risk would be the tanks getting stuck, but with a couple dozen (or hundred) other tanks, the risk is minimal. Just make sure the soldiers have enough MRE's and water for a week or two.

[@politicallyinsensitive4200]

@@o3941 the A-10 didn't exist in WW2 but a squadron on B-52's or even B-17's and a few P-38's would've helped a lot. Let's not forget the Air Force didn't exist then either...it was the Army Air Corp. For that matter artillery would've been a huge benefit and they would've been able to engage the zombies long before the tanks and infantry.

[@Dularr]

I would say go with the Desdin strategy. Carpet bomb the zombies with incinary bombs and watch the zombies burn..

[@ricky0738]

Right, Terrible strategy to put the tanks back.

[@loaytarek135]

My man here ready for ww3

[@erroristmusic]

So a 20k WW2 army can kill a whole Slovenia of zombies. Cool.

[@xenotypos]

Probably, even 10k would be enough if the tanks were in first line. They'd aggro the zombies when the soldiers can kill them without losing firepower.

[@erbob1]

Zombie Luka drops 50 in the army

[@bulthaosen1169]

@@xenotypos I think they will run out of ammunition first.

[@richardd7614]

if you didnt believe it before this documentary provided the proof

[@loxlytrail755]

I am currently a teen and i am so proud and glad to say that i will live for decades longer and one day get to see over 1 billion units on screen!!!!!!!. Just imagine how crazy thats going to be when UEBS 3 4 5 6 or so on comes out years later in the future.

[@GeneralJiyaan]

Eh, how're you so sure you'll live to see that? Life's unpredictability

[@reynaldoflores4522]

Even with unlimited ammo, the soldiers cannot just keep on firing non-stop! Their gun barrels would be in serious danger of overheating. Instead of modern assault rifles, they could've done much better with using old-fashioned water -cooled machine guns which could fire continuously much longer than air-cooled assault rifles.

[@fernandoper]

🤓

[@TheShootist]

tanks weren't firing canister.

[@liamjohnson2474]

they're shooting zombies numb nuts, realism isn't a concern.

[@11111653]

☝️🤓

[@jayj8664]

no such thing as an assault rifle

[@shaihulud4515]

A formidable example of strategic failure of the human army: placing your heavy artillery behind your troops is a fauxpas of it's own, but lining them up two rows deep is getting your general's ass fired for sure :) The strengths and weaknesses of the opponent were not taken into consideration - with mindless undead hordes coming on foot straight at you, outranking you 1:100 you wouldn't want to meet them with a linear line at all. More likely you would meet them with multiple wedge formations, each letting themselves fall back, while letting the tanks hit face on. You can be zombie as much as you like - no chance to crack the metal monster. So movement and self covering flanks are your primary choices. Yes - they've won, but they almost lost all their men. If you read it this far: please keep in mind, I'm taking myself not too serious here, OK?

[@cosmic_sloth]

I was going to ask why the heavy armor vehicles weren't in front, what's the point of all that heavy armor if it isn't protecting the infantry behind it?

[@kingjames7904]

The heavy armour alone could beat them just a matter of ammunition

[@kornelmezei2872]

in almost every zombie apokalypse movie the military gets overrun by the undead. then the protagonists and his friends kill the zombies with pistols, knives, a pipe....but i still have no clue how a tank would lose to any amount of zombies.

[@maksymvoitovych4492]

They should have sent the shotgun guys to charge the zombies at night, carrying the torches.

[@pffa9675]

@@kornelmezei2872 tanks are not invulnerable. without infantry, their tracks can get busted, they can run out of ammo and fuel and their main turret can get clogged (big problem. They even have small lids for the turrets to prevent debris from going in) and blow itself up

[@markc1548]

I'd like to see the tanks firing while driving through the crowd, they could probably kill more just by continually driving over the front ranks and through the main body. And if the soldiers fired while moving away with a few tanks driving over any groups that closed the gap.

[@arseniilistopadov2716]

Я тоже не понял этой тактики - выставить пехоту щитом для танков.

[@mariomeza3514]

No way their tracks and wheels would get jammed from all the zombie guts

[@markc1548]

@@mariomeza3514 A tank weighing 65T is not getting stuck on a bit of slippery mince meat, they are literally designed to be a killing machine there would never be enough fragile flesh in any one place to make the slightest difference. I'f driven through a solid crowd a hundred meters deep a tank couldn't even be slowed down. And there isn't a human bone that could stop the meat grinders used as a drive train.

[@Rastamanjungle]

@@markc1548 this whole scenario is rubbish btw. Tanks should be in front of the fragile infrantry and yes part of them should be driving thru zombies. Also Human positioning is very wrong, we have brains zombies dont, why would we pick a fight in a zombie suitable terrain flat terraint. The whole point of this should be we got brains and technology they got the numbers and stamina. So any kind of high ground would just do fine, Also straight line stretch the front as much as possible? Why? IF they got the numbers advantage we want to dont want to stretch the front line. but nice video i enjoyed it :D

[@Rastamanjungle]

@@markc1548 and yea there is no way a 40/50 ton tank is getting stopped by human flesh. They be out of fuel first before anything stops the tank. Take one tank, mount infrantry on it, let it be bait for zombies. Reverse the tank let the zombies chase that one with infrantry on top. And the other tanks just drive thru them zombies. Easy win not a single human dies.

[@Doug-k7t]

Still better than most full zombie movies ..applause!

[@filipeg165]

This just proves that an amazing Warhammer game can be made.

[@kenjohnsumampong4663]

And this would be the astro militarum

[@sopix7980]

not for now but 1 day my dude

[@MeTuLHeD]

Yes!

[@dravendfr]

In summary: The amount of zombies that died here is a roughly the amount of people that died in the battle of Stalingrad. Granted that was also with the battle’s duration lasting around 5-6 months.

[@maxmagnus777]

+1.7 million civilians that Germans sent to concentration camps and exterminated most of them.

[@davidhoekstra4620]

Zombies are already dead.

[@bigboyikea6395]

@@davidhoekstra4620 oh shush

[@aaronhayes7562]

Well now I don’t feel crazy for having that be the EXACT thought I had after seeing the videos title.

[@davidhoekstra4620]

@@bigboyikea6395 It's 2-1, me and Aaron Hayes are better versed in the imaginary discipline of Zombiology than you.

[@Subjectivity13]

Considering how symmetrical the formations were, it's crazy how differently things went on the left flank compared to the right flank. I'd imagine that small oasis on the way to the right flank might have been why it went so differently. I take it there's no armor rating for each unit type, just more hit points for more armored units. Otherwise I don't think any amount of zombie clawing would ever destroy one of those tanks, even if it ran out of both ammunition and gas and just sat there forever.

[@mattguest6326]

I was thinking the same thing. Something pushed the zombies to flank the line, and keep doing so once it was righteously flanked.

[@giraffineer]

Well not perfectly symmetrical. If i see that correctly the right flank got 3 rows of tanks whereas the left flank only got 2 rows^^

[@Dtitilator]

The tanks can simply drive around running over these zombies and not get seriously damaged.

[@Tatusiek_1]

why couldnt the tanks just drive on zombies?

[@kryse4806]

its funny I was waiting how could zombies ever even so much as scratch a tank. Then lo and behold, it just fucking poofs out of existence

[@johnnyredux4019]

Werhmacht: "Hold my beer!"

[@durbledurb3992]

Thank you so much. I've been wondering about this since I was about 5 years old, but what I had never considered was that at the end of the battle there would be 4,270 zombies unaccounted for. Now I've gotta spend the rest of my life wondering where those zombies could have gone to! Were they buried under all the other zombies, swimming in a sub-zombial sea of zombie blood, unable to satiate their hunger for brains? Had they decided to attack something in the opposite direction half way through their charge? I'll not sleep tonight.

[@gigachad7205]

They were declared missing

[@lionbolt2136]

They probably had their legs blown off but not officially killed.

[@veramae4098]

They had read some YT comments injected at random about Jesus Christ. Repented, saved, and carried bodily to heaven. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

[@googiegress]

They were conscientious objectors who deserted at the first opportunity.

[@davidlee3107]

I love how 90% of the bullets go up to 40 feet in the air above the zombies

[@bobbythorton7693]

what I'm thinking the whole time

[@JoshEastham]

Maybe they are shooting the ones further back having the bullets drop down on them

[@googiegress]

@@JoshEastham At that angle they would just miss.

[@olzhaszhumagulov7848]

Sending tanks forward to go through the zombies would have been effective. Like, you'd save a ton of ammo, the soldiers would have an easier time focusing their fire since the zombies wouldnt be moving like a freaking tsunami. Plus it would help to reduce the ptsd among the survivors. Imagine having to live with having survived a zombie horde and shooting at wall of dead people point blank.

[@산기슭-n3k]

This is a game, bro 😂

[@rumieHotshot]

@@산기슭-n3k and he had a strategy, which is I fully agree to him.

[@LiveForJesusOnly]

Would be effective, but dangerous.

[@syahmi518]

not until bones, flesh and groin stuck onto the gear

[@bankrollwels]

His tactics are horrible... no mortars, Artillery, or protective barriers

[@yellowishyoutubechannel3900]

Awesome 👍👍✨✨

[@RoyCyle]

So with unlimited ammo, rather indiscriminate firing, and 0 tactics the soldiers almost won.

[@rufusgoldstein2655]

They did win

[@RoyCyle]

@@rufusgoldstein2655 oh? I didn't watch all the way to the end as it looked like they were losing.

[@Anonymous-kh5nq]

@@RoyCyle ya

[@jasoethesentienteyeshapedg4847]

You expect realism in a game like this?

[@enkilihma7580]

Além deles nunca recarregarem as armas, também tem os tanques com balas de canhão ilimitadas, assim é claro que fica fácil.

[@Yora21]

Tanks are fun, but I'd love to see multiple launch rocket artillery firing nonstop at a zombie horde.

[@treyjetson5320]

Yea I dont know how this game works but in reality I would just send the Tanks straight into the zombies theres no way the zombies could get into the Tanks and they would cause massive damage to the horde.

[@edwardofwales8541]

Auto Sherman tanks shooting looks and acts very much like RL.

[@darlingtaburnal8443]

Needed more tank maybe

[@tyreza79]

Tanks should have been front line and run zombies overs while killing them

[@tyreza79]

@@treyjetson5320 that's the way

[@rgerber]

Insane how this even can run so smooth. Literally million of entities and effects

[@manager4409]

maybe the whole universe is a simulation like this. So whatever complexity this battle x infinity

[@ahmadmurtazaasadi1295]

It was the BEST clip I've watched recently, Thanks mate

[@TheOrderOfDanos]

I never usually enjoy UEBS videos due to the terrible narration, but the way you shot this was utterly fantastic. The cinematographer in you, noticing all the fantastic angles and shots with the music was gorgeous. Epic!

[@freddyfourfingerz9126]

The stack of the zombie bodies would be 10 meters high eventually, making it more difficult to kill multiple zombies with each bullet since there will now be a protective barrier.

[@egcoon2750]

I agree and I thing in real life situation we would be moving and be behind the tanks

[@cristiangimenez6549]

Si contar que no podrías tener tantas municiones como se ve ahí, a los 5 minutos se les termina

[@sidewinder3422]

@@egcoon2750 In real life the Air Force will just carpet bomb the zombies.

[@itspetz7421]

@@egcoon2750 I made a comment saying the tanks should be in the front... wtf will a zombie do to a tank besides bury it or get its tracks all gummed up

[@lucozademan999]

Yes but also the zombies wouldn't be able to progress or walk forward due to stumbling on all the bodies.

[@carpediemarts705]

That was interesting and surprising. With the million zombie horde fights, it often comes down to flanking and terrain with body berms becoming a terrain feature that hampers the defensibility of a line. Tanks reduce body barns with the fly back. That low hill in the middle must have been the factor that allowed the zombies to break the line as the soldiers slightly to the right of the hill either wouldn't aim at or were less likely to hit zombies coming from just to the left of the hill and versa visa allowing the tide to creep closer at that point. I'd like to see this with just slightly deeper lines of soldiers, like 3 deep more, two blocks of soldiers at the right and left to guard the flanks, and a thin row of soldiers along the very back line to guard the tanks. That or build the back line alternating with a square of tanks and a square of soldiers every 200 feet. So improved version of this line vs 3 mil zombies, if your machine could handle that.

[@duewhit310]

2nd video i watched. User doesnt understand concept of flanks.

[@Nirobi-D]

They can just use tanks as plant vs zombies grass cutter

[@raieverardokaleosakristi987]

because the zombies don't use weapons, not the strong American soldiers

[@kevinlyons7321]

It only comes down to 1 thing NUKE THE MTHFKRS

[@IAA2152]

Sounds like you know your shit

[@leonestello]

P.S. 21:47 You're Welcome 🤗

[@JaguarPanda]

Tanks could have been on the frontline in a tight formation in a "M" kinda shape, so they can protect soldiers front and sides, and leave 1 chokepoint open in the middle to release some of the zombie flow pressure to let infantry pick them off easily. Too many zombies going through the chokepoint? tighten the formation to close it and run them over till its a bit cleared out, rinse and repeat

[@Retsler54]

Yep. Why not tanks in the front and let them crush zombies and shoot at them at the same time?

[@aephspore3341]

@@Retsler54 Zombies stopped by tanks and bullets stopped by tanks simple :P

[@raymondjoseph7177]

Was thinking the same thing. Shields in front against an army like that. Those who are not crushed or shot, will 99% be shot if they make it through.

[@alienclay2]

Tank should have been straight lawn mowers

[@ireallyreallyhategoogle]

Except THOSE zombies can apparently claw their way through a tank's armour.

[@ON-O]

Now imagine if the army had used any sort of formation, as well as opened up fire at 1000 yards instead of 10 🤷‍♂️

[@JuanAntonioGarciaHeredia]

Now imagine if soldiers didnt have infinite ammo or their bullets magically go throught their mates without killing them too

[@Mark0Brazil]

And 20,000 troops is not an army but "just" a division!

[@knightawz]

@@Mark0Brazil what number is considered an army?

[@Mark0Brazil]

@@knightawz The size of an Army varies significantly depending on the country, context and scope of responsibility, but generally considering that a Minimum size of an army must contain at least 2 corps, as well as each corps must contain a minimum of 2 divisions, and as each division must have at least 12,000 people (replacement reserves included), a small army from a country with modest size population must have AT LEAST between 50,000 and 60,000 troops (ditto previous). Obviously, the larger a country's population and resources, as well as an army's context of action, the larger it will be, containing more army corps, which in turn will contain more divisions (6 to 10 at maximum, depending of Divisions size), each one with more troops (up to maximum almost of 25,000 personels each). By WWII standards for example, an Army size varied from 150k to 300k men, being the average of then 11 times higher the 20k shown in this video.

[@knightawz]

@@Mark0Brazil thanks, so the min is like 50k, but it depends on various factors of a country

[@thepooaprinciple5144]

Yeah the army of soldiers would have most definitely of lost this battle due to ammo shortage, and friendly fire from tanks once the zombies got close enough. Crazy to think this is only 2 million zombies and there are nearly 8 Billion people on the planet living currently. "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups." -George Carlin

[@zankou5611]

Trump 2016 🤣

[@pirateman1144]

If you're talking real the soldiers would have slaughtered the zombies with zero casualties. Infantry would be making a steady retreat to maintain distance while firing and the tanks would be pushing forward to run down the horde while firing.

[@samsungedge9348]

Salam to all, 99.9% that epic battle between the 20,000 soldiers using sophistocated assult riffles and tanks will come true to our country. If the Pinklawan continue to rule the country. Illegal drugs or shabu is very serious problem in our country because illegal drugs is already state sponsored business during the time of late pres. Pinoy. His DOJ SECRETARY and 5 PNP GENERALS ARE THE BIG PROTECTORS TO FLOURISH SHABU BUSINESS. THANKS TO THE ALMIGHTY ALLAH FOR SENDING PRES. DUTERTE TO STOP THIS DEMONIC GOVERNANCE OF THE PINKLAWAN. SUKRAN OF BANGSA MORO STATE.

[@chinabluewho]

@@pirateman1144 LOL , the soldiers would have been slaughtered in open terrain like that , you need a head shot to kill a zombie and you only have an 8 round clip in a Garand and a WW2 GI had a magazine belt with 8 clips bringing the total to 74, plus the fact that each soldier should be carrying a 1911 with a 7 round magazine and a spare bring the total to 14. So 14 times 20,000 is 280,00 and 74 times 20,000 is 1,480,000 equaling 1,760,000 so you would need every round fired to be a head shot and you would still need to deal with 240,000 zombies without ammo . The numbers get even worse when you take 5 of the soldiers of the line and put them in tanks as each tank can only hold a very limited amount of rounds , seventy 75mm rounds and tanks use anti material rounds , not anti personal rounds, trust me the Shermans did not use canister grape shot during WW2, almost all of the explosive force from a round detonating is lost in the ground. Tanks are psychological weapons more than a front line weapon and I am pretty sure the zombies don't scare easily. The real main weapon on a Sherman tank is its .50 cal Browning machine gun which in the video none seemed to have, if they had the Ma-Deux on top it would have been a little closer but still a massacre for any soldier on foot. The only soldiers who would have survived this battle would be the tank crews if they kept all hatches closed and pretended that the tank was empty otherwise the zombies would cover the tanks to the point they would smother the crew from lack of air.

[@gibbs677bg]

@@zankou5611 Yeah cause everything Is hunky dory under Joe fell of my bike Biden Isn't It????

[@manny1o8]

Legends never die ❌ Cameraman Never Die ✅

[@impactodelsurenterprise2440]

I like how the zombies still have the mental aptitude to conduct the classic flaking maneuver

[@pieet_sen]

If you reload and include friendly fire... the front would have dissolved much faster... because where should the second line shoot without shooting their comrades?

[@okdaccord5729]

And tank too lol

[@BionicAir]

@@okdaccord5729 the tanks would fuck both of those lines up in a blink of an eye lol

[@Setech666]

if you would than disable unlimited ammo, the battle would be over in a heartbeat

[@AeizZone]

zombies arn't infectious ?

[@dennispetrov9628]

But, in real life, no number of zombies would be able to take out a tank. And tanks could just roll over them )

[@skytyme7721]

It appears that most of the military fire is flying over the heads of the zombies. I feel that if the military component was arranged in multiple triangular formations it would be much more efficient

[@jeffburnham6611]

That's a standard defensive position, all on line. Wedge formations were not used defensively.

[@alexgray8986]

The army would probably create a half circle or a full ring if it was defending this, they wouldn't just be able to flank the gun lines. Also, I think the tanks or anti infantry fighting vehicles would do a LOT more damage.

[@omega13whitelucario95]

Tbh if the game had them Replacing a third or a fourth of the tanks with machine gun equipped Half Tracks would have also helped save more lives

[@error9156]

It's a great battle. Sad of course that the left flank was broken so quickly (

[@HawnkoxticBlackmorth4444]

In the war you lose something

[@gibbs677bg]

yeah really sad, I had to get a box of tissues. WTF??

[@Useaname]

I got a box of tissues also. But not because I was crying.....

[@Joel-Rubearsdad]

“Never on the field of human conflict, was so much owed by so many to so few” - Winston Churchill on the great Middle Eastern zombie battle of ww2

[@Ash01010]

invader genocidal churchill

[@oliverladykillerbiscuit]

For comparison, Russia had lost around 27M people and Germany had around 13M active soldiers during WW2.

[@thatlonelygiraffeinc.6989]

Not all in one formation though

[@icamefromnowhere]

That 27M include 14M civilian population, plus you forgot to count finnish, hungarian, italian and other Germany's aides.

[@danielhopkins2277]

@@icamefromnowhere You're probably (too many different counts for the Soviet Union) right, but especially with the civilians you can't be sure who was actually killed by Hitler's or by Stalin's orders.

[@Hinitsunoakusesu]

#pcc mgl #guajeru

[@kurtx8827]

2 million zombies is like half the population of Los Angeles.

[@Carlo_ReNews]

No it isn’t

[@suryahufo5593]

Here we go again. Zombies destroying tanks

[@gatorhunter1]

The tanks could have taken out a quarter of the zombies if they would have opened fire with their main guns before they ever reached the front line.

[@BudoReflex]

I was thinking the same thing.

[@urmo345]

Plus zombies would not to be able to take out tanks. Tanks are active until ammo runs out

[@GTheoMedia]

And also the tanks could just run them over:)

[@JK-uj8ur]

Unlimited ammo, no barrel overheating, bullets magically flying through friendlies, everyone keeps composure througout an extremely bloody close up battle, zombies somehow well organized and able to destroy tanks with bare hands. Also why no flamethrowers, would gave been the weapon of choice against zombies, no? Other than that, good job.

[@jonathanmapp3312]

The only thing worse than a zombie coming at you is a zombie on fire coming at you. Flamethrowers are the worst possible weapon to use against a zombie. They dont feel pain and unless you con0letely incinerate them in 1 second...you're gonna be in problems big shoots

[@x_nightmare_bg_x6719]

Also y did the soldirs just stand their and let the zombies eat them?

[@bobesponja3702]

Flamethrowers are one the worst weapons you can use against zombies especially on open ground unless the zombie are downed or the fire instantly incinerate them youre basically creating a living fireball (besides the flamethrower main usage is to clear fortifications that cant be dealt normally not direct combat since its not made for long uses and the flamethrower terror factor wont effect zombies)

[@FaisalKhan-so9kb]

JB olooo

[@FaisalKhan-so9kb]

Lnonn no k

[@Rishi-p5q]

Each soldier has to shot 100 bullets but each soldier here shooted lakhs of bullets😂😂

[@Wirmish]

The tanks only have to charge through the horde of zombies leaving the smallest possible space between them. The soldiers only have to take care of the zombies who manage not to get crushed. 😎

[@alfredstimoli2590]

doubt it. a biological mass that big, the tanks would quickly bog down with body parts stuck in moving parts. are you going to have your troops walk over squashed/injured zombie bodies? Pretty soon your unbroken line would be broken and soldiers needless risk being bitten. you try to keep the zombies as far away from you as possible.

[@JonMartinYXD]

@@alfredstimoli2590 A tank can drive over people all day with no problem. Bones will not jam the tracks.

[@alfredstimoli2590]

@@JonMartinYXD if a tank can get bogged down in mud it can get bogged down in a massive pile of machine gun shredded zombie bodies.

[@Nelson-Man]

@@alfredstimoli2590 But if you keep moving no piles will form

[@JonMartinYXD]

@@alfredstimoli2590 I was assuming the tanks would roll forward immediately instead of waiting until zombies piled up.

[@HepCatJack]

There was a type of tank in WWII called a mine flail which would spin iron chains at high speed hitting the ground to explode mines. These would likely be very effective against zombies since they would either bash the heads of zombies or the flail would cut their arms off.

[@christopherrogers303]

I wish the battle had played through to the end. I wanted to see the soldiers who would have been counting their lucky stars on the left flank that saw the last zombies fall, knowing that they would have been the next to die if the battle had carried on just a bit longer... imagine the stories they would tell (or not tell) their virtual kids.

[@العقيدمعمرالقذافي-ح4ف]

bro has access to NASA supercomputers

[@wuchunmeng]

Anyone else start cracking up at the sight of zombies somersaulting through the air?

[@joeyoliveira7815]

🤣

[@zankou5611]

personally I would like to have seen the tanks running around on top of zombies while firing into the horde

[@rickw28]

Had the soldiers used the terrain to their advantage and gotten them into a valley with a bottle neck& surrounded them on 3 sides they would've had way better results. But this being what it was its still entertaining.

[@kipsmithers8816]

I was hoping to find the best comment. Look no further. If the comment section was a party you would be the guy workin the room. I like your style

[@kipsmithers8816]

I was hoping to find the best comment. Look no further. If the comment section was a party you would be the guy workin the room. I like your style

[@kipsmithers8816]

I was hoping to find the best comment. Look no further. If the comment section was a party you would be the guy workin the room. I like your style

[@kipsmithers8816]

I was hoping to find the best comment. Look no further. If the comment section was a party you would be the guy workin the room. I like your style

[@rickyracestrickland8927]

That's what I think they should've done. Their numbers wouldn't have meant sh*t!!

[@andreasplosky8516]

This is as realistic as it gets. This is how it actually happened in the fall of 1943. This why we are now all zombies. Consumer zombies, of the worst kind.

[@vasvas8914]

This says a lot about society

[@inyourdreams6144]

Yes

[@KennTollens]

2 million is so many looking at from that perspective, and the bubonic plague killed over12 times that many. This is why the zergling rush worked so well in Starcraft, 3 targets..1 bullet. Good thing to note in battle, the flank is weak.

[@antonioirizarry8083]

The American Army prevails over the massive army of the undead, however one remained alive... captured? No one knows, only that the remaining undead corpse may yet cause another zombie apocalypse.

[@GR-bn3xj]

He said I'm getting the F out of here. Like you said, only takes one to start a new apocalypse.

[@kevincaruthers5412]

Let's try this again with a commander with some brains. Emplacements. Movement control. (Yeah, they are zombies, but I bet they aren't too fast when tangled in razor wire) etc. You know, treat it like a battle and not like two gangs in the hood.

[@RinkieGeintie]

You can use RTS mode in this game to move troops around

[@ddubs1778]

Would’ve been interesting to see what would happen if the soldiers killed turned into zombies

[@ToxicSkullFear]

Would not change much as the 20k extra soldiers would not matter

[@necronic23]

would be interesting to take logistics and morale into account. Most military tactics and weapons systems of modern armies are not designed to stop an enemy that feels no pain, has no morale to break, unless completely destroyed is relatively combat capable, capable of replenishment of numbers when killing/infection of the enemy.

[@doctadeath2020]

Zombie tanks

[@The_Bird_Bird_Harder]

At least in the first I believe they do

[@DexTroyTV]

that would be awesome

[@fleshnfangs]

That's bonkers. Love it.

[@user-beyefendy]

Будем надеяться, что будущем, разработчики этой игры сделают в конце то концов траншеи для бойцов и заграждения против пехоты и техники.😁

[@Greggch]

а ещё лимит на патроны

[@paveltelegin7736]

Почему танки их просто не поехали давить? 8) Что за треш

[@lyoovue5223]

@@paveltelegin7736 Ослабла бы линия огня, если бы поехали то масса бы через них бы перашла = так думаю.. Но дыхалка у зомби как у спортсменов, столько бежали, после такой пробежки не каждый добежал бы 😃

[@MrGaraSem]

А чего за игра или симулятор?

[@amidenfetrax4044]

Авиация не помешала бы...

[@brightsunlight335]

Best noncence i've ever seen. No Reload and the second line is not killing their own people in the first line.

[@drewlovelyhell4892]

If ever there was an ideal time to use a tactical nuke.. A few points: The soldiers didn't utilise their greatest advantage; the ability to use strategy to deploy their forces in the most effective way. I would think that the least they should do is arrange their ranks in a semi-circle or multiple chevrons, to keep their fire pattern less one-dimensional, and prevent the enemy flanking them. Or even better, they could set up their tanks in forward positions and bombard the enemy while moving back to the infantry line. Once the zombies are amongst the troops, you're just killing your own men with friendly fire. Also, the soldiers would have run out of ammo pretty quick, even if they each had a couple of dozen spare magazines. Finally, unless those zombies have superhuman strength, they would never penetrate the solid steel armour of the tanks. They'd grind their fingers and teeth to nubs and hardly scratch the paint.

[@thisisfakegucci]

its a game

[@MrNaKillshots]

@@thisisfakegucci I thought it teally happened.

[@omegacon4]

Circle formation is the right call here. Excellent interior lines. The gamer who set this scenario up has no understanding of military tactics.

[@mikenick9163]

@@omegacon4 of course not. Most gamers ARE zombies lol

[@dreimartin733]

@@omegacon4 Relax captain america, it's just a guy having fun in a game and sharing his experience with us.

[@KiSH9891]

It isn't the unlimited or noclip ammo, but the infinite courage to just stand there and not fleeing is the most unrealistic aspect of them all.

[@donniglesias3073]

How I imagine Imperial Guard vs Nurgle zombies from 40k would look like

[@okdaccord5729]

Imperium soldier...., one billion to put one by one in the Map, this youtubers need more beer lol and the nurgle zombies... No comment lol but it will be Amazing.

[@KyudoKun]

I'd love see another version of this with an air support

[@Ruzzky_Bly4t]

And/or artillery.

[@ihavetubes]

And no infinite ammo

[@johnmiwa6256]

The zombies would have won if they started with a flanking maneuver.

[@barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188]

But they're zombies. They have no strategy lol

[@sominogjohnoliverp.7325]

@@barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188 true hahaha

[@carpediemarts705]

The flanking maneuver is the main way they do win when they do. It's how they cause the greatest losses.

[@hendragnw26]

Well the Zombie General did draw a battle plan. No one read that.

[@carpediemarts705]

@@hendragnw26 hard to read when your eyes are rotted out

[@Ret_Army_Combat_Vet]

As Soldier and leader of Soldiers, I would never line up my forces like this. To start with the tanks would be in front and Soldiers in the gap, and I would started firing my main guns a lot earlier. Nice simulation and funny.

[@JonMartinYXD]

Why do the Shermans wait so long before firing? The 76 mm M1 gun had a range of over 13 km; all the zombies start well within that range. Each shot would shred all zombies within a 6 m radius. Once the zombies got within 2 km the Shermans could have started firing their M2 Brownings as well.

[@arandomstormtrooper5865]

It's just a Game dude

[@ChristesII]

You need to write an angry letter to the devs!

[@nejtackaldrig1650]

@@arandomstormtrooper5865 its a Simulator meaning it should be as real as possible

[@JonMartinYXD]

@@arandomstormtrooper5865 Except it sells itself as a simulator. I'm not asking for Arma 3 or DCS World levels of realism, but at least something better than zombies being able to destroy a tank just by repeatedly slapping it.

[@mikemulligan5731]

@@arandomstormtrooper5865 I think he's just pointing out how this "sim" game lacks in the Sim department, Einstein.

[@Lelldorin84]

I especially liked the zombies cartwheeling over the battle.

[@enginepy]

You’d figure the tanks could just run them over near the end, or have several do strafing runs earlier on. A few trenches filled with razor wire or even those WW2 iron hedgehogs would be great to slow them down or channel them into a fire corridor. Also machine gun positions along the front lines would have been great. But so would mortars, artillery, strafing runs and bombs from aircraft. I guess that’s not the point of this battle

[@thamakil1394]

The point of this battle is that it is pointless ...

[@enginepy]

@@thamakil1394 if you say so. But that’s no fun. Strategy and tech makes all the difference.

[@benjamingardner3314]

Landmines as well. Those would be immensely potent at breaking up the first waves. And yeah, mortars. I was very confused why it took so long for the army to start sending rounds, and then I realized they weren't firing mortars.

[@enginepy]

@@benjamingardner3314 agreed. Mines would be great. Even if it just dismembered the zombies it would slow them down and make it easy to mop up.

[@ShaunPaget]

aye , i would like to see how strategy would change this attack. Put the armor in front of the infantry and make spaced strafing runs through the horde, defend the firing line with trench/wire, use elevation to open more firing lanes, mortars/artillery to tenderize the targets. Lastly funnel the into a soup bowl of destruction.

[@tainahautamaki5726]

Damn what a task to defeat an army of zombies who are far more organized 😱😱😱

[@BionicAir]

wonder how long it took to put 2 million zombies on the map lol this is beyond epic, and hilarious at the same time. the zombie ragdolls flying everywhere is so good

[@okdaccord5729]

Hold my beer lol

[@JTMaster]

The thing basically allows you to just place blocks of them somewhere on a map. Real easy

[@BionicAir]

@@JTMaster I kind of expected it to have something like that. Would be absolutely mental to place 3 million units individually 😆

[@RinkieGeintie]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/baPHlI2eoLiNi5I Here is one with more than 8 million troops if you’re interested

[@DMM-cv5fh]

I think the German soldier on the eastern front in WW2 would identify with this. There are countless accounts of Germans turning their barrels white hot and still the Soviet Red Army kept coming.

[@creedrichards137]

"Stand Firm, ye boys from Maine." This kind of reminds me to the Battle of Little Round Top, it's a shame that the AI cannot refuse the line like the 20th Maine did. If the flanks had folded in at an angle they may have held better. See the move "Gettysburg" to see what I'm talking about.

[@asionglumantas567]

God damn it soldier!

[@careliacarelita2294]

Imposible en la realidad. No se puede sostener tamaño cadencia de fuego sostenido!. No hay arma que aguante el sobrecalentamiento. Especialmente en armas de la ww2!...""🤓

[@belfordmcpimface3482]

Well that was fun. I do see a few issues in translating this to 'real life': - Ammo. Nuff said. - Heat. The barrels of every weapon would be white hot slag well before a million zombies died. - Morale: After a while, some troops would break.

[@dewayneholland9700]

I've always thought a war against zombies would last a matter of weeks, months tops. Literally everyone knows the mythology. That includes the military. Flame throwers would be used much more, and I'd wager a lot more development would go into micro wave guns. A cooked zombie brain is just as ruined as one shot in the head. It'd also be foolish not to develop some kind of cheap and dirty armor to protect against bites. Leather armor covering the entire body would certainly stop a bite. Tanks are not the biggest vehicles available. If you've ever seen an earth mover, you'd understand how effective that thing would be should it be repurposed. I think we'd rise to the challenge, that's for sure.

[@Grivian]

I've always thought the opposite. I've never bought the claim in every zombie media that the military was defeated.

[@isaacmarcucci3777]

The first zombie would die before it could anything.

[@johnsonbro4944]

It depends on the type of the zombies, location and how fast and sudden the initial spread is. If it's the worst possible scenario, probably the only way to kill them would be by nukes so we would be living in an apocalyptic world one way or another

[@Reubonics]

Standard motorcycle suits with a backboard would protect against zombie bites.

[@Jeff-mv2vm]

Chainmail in the joints, thick padding and a face shield with chainmail and padding for the neck. Hot AF, but you'd be most stationary.

[@cameronbrown3380]

Yet in movies 5 zombies will overwhelm a military checkpoint.

[@Hubert_G]

in 28 days later where there is no zombies but actuall humans with rabies that can get killed with shot to body military still fails XD

[@childerikpratz5430]

Heyo captain!! We need more vids like this!!👌 this content is two weeks old now and still coming back to rewatch it. straight bonkers dude!! And just to say 5 mill zombies and a few extra line of thomson machinegunners would be epic in this followup 😜

[@Onewayto2024]

Someone needs to do one of these with 2 million soldiers and 47 billion zombies. Let it play out yo.

[@616productions8]

Very fun to watch but the space separating the zombies and the army would have SO MANY zombie bodies on the ground it would have slowed the advance down considerably. Also there would have been a mound of bodies running the length of the army line like ten feet tall which would again be slowing down the masses of zombies. Still pretty cool though.

[@raaagent]

I like the determination of soldiers in the front line. Hats off 👍

[@subagyo874]

Fjjrjfk

[@covercalls88]

A interesting video. The tanks are not really designed to be used in this type of static battle. Zombies could not really take out a tank and should have been used in advance of the troops creating pockets where they could create cross fire situations and really concentrate their fire power in killing zones much like what Rommel and Patton would do.

[@poojapetshali5565]

Militry would be -bapp re baap zombies ki barat😂

[@Blietzkrieg]

It's horrific when you think that WWII had 40 times the amount of casualties as depicted here - not to mention the wounded.

[@evoke2976]

The wounded and the mentally damaged.

[@ofb1583]

No chance of having the tanks simply drive through the endless ranks of zombies, having expended all their HE ammunition at range. Setting up machine guns to 'penetrate' fire hitting several zombies at once on the same elevation might have helped. No use either of a fighting retreat to cover those replenishing ammunition, maybe even using afv's as transport to retire to further points of vantage for long range, loss free, massacre.

[@dumbcat]

might run out of gas. then the zombies could squish guts into all the air vents and fill the tanks up with goo

[@regalblade8171]

Or just do little of this and spend mostly into bombers, artillery and air strikes

[@R_M.P]

It was a fun video! Military logistics aside, but rather talking zombie logistics, unless it's a headshot, way more zombies would still be alive...Also, many of the soldiers who came in contact would have been bit and turned into zombies exponentially infecting the whole regimen. I don't see any way the soldiers survive the onslaught. LOL!

[@LucianDevine]

I thought about that too, but adding another 10K zombies to the mix wouldn't have changed the math much, and even if you don't get a headshot, if you damage a single leg of the zombie enough, it'll be too slow to matter in combat and get finished off later.

[@addictedtominisandlovingit3912]

Zombies don't turn instantly. Takes hours for them to rise. A standing order to shoot any fallen comrade would minimize this risk.

[@alexmotts]

Your leaving out in a real situation. They wouldve had artillery carpet bombs mortors choppers ect. This is a torally unrealistic scenerio

[@regalblade8171]

@@alexmotts if those soldiers had machine guns instead of rifles they would have significantly less casualties

[@R_M.P]

@@addictedtominisandlovingit3912 That's not true. Fast zombies turn in a couple of minutes. Haven't you seen the movies World War Z and Train to Busan?