Can Chat Fix My Chess Bot? (Pufferfish 1.0)

[@kiwiace4613]

next video: play against all of the bots YOURSELF

[@lilithname4100]

Yes please

[@johnyeldry]

ja ja ja (bist meine englisch gut?)

[@Adamiscrackedmyguy]

​@@johnyeldryDu sprichst Deutsch, aber netter Versuch

[@RoseOnFire]

​@@johnyeldry sí, tu inglés es muy bueno. ¿cómo está mi alemán?

[@LaysarOwO]

i feel like a big oversight is the viewers dont know the point values of your rules, so it was hard to counteract them

[@Naveication]

Its relative to the piece values, i guessed somewhere between 2 to 3 for the pawns on 4th rank rule by observing that it would move to the fifth rank when it can take an undefended knight (resulting in +3 in material values), it never did to caputure a pawn (would only be +1) and it was hesitant to do so when a knight was defended (only +2 in material after takeback) So I think it's not an oversight and the rough values can be estimated. It only needed to beat a 550 bot, so even if we didnt get it right exactly it would still do well enough if we get into the general area

[@veedrac]

This is also an exploit. Someone can just add the rule ‘multiply all piece values by 1000’ and this all but invalidates the bad heuristics.

[@__--_--_-----]

no. you can estimate the point value pretty accurately. estimate the loss of eval when the bot adheres to one of its pretty obvious rules instead of making the logical move.

[@CodeAlpaca]

Guess of the rules: 1. Push pawns to 4th rank 2. Push king to the end of the board 3. Place nights on the rim (a3, h3) 4. Give up the queen 5. Unsure on the 5th rule

[@bloswi]

We thank @crate for sponsoring this video! Bro my name was so long with so many spaces it didn't even appear between Xeroxia and GoldFG (21:02)

[@pncka]

After destroying Chatfish, they move on to ruining your bot.

[@galenirving-sachs2513]

Great video! These chess bots have been really entertaining! I'm curious though, how good is Pufferfish if you reverse the rules? Ex. Instead -1.1 for each pawn we have, it's +1.1

[@Radio_ink114]

Most likely not want to promote if the piece value is less than what you would have if you didn't promote

[@PrestigiousWarrior6500]

How many ways do you wanna make it not checkmate Greenlemongames: YES

[@5argan]

I like the incremental style more than the select first then play. Maybe we can alternate selecting a few rules, playing, then adding another rule or something?

[@Aaa-vp6ug]

6th. Now have chat try to make the next Worstfish

[@johnnyfields1392]

This is a really good video, I hope he does more

[@aungminkhant9501]

Suggestion: Test the Chatfish bot against the Logic bot. [6th but no one probably cares we just want fame.]

[@_imfriendly95_67]

i wonder what would happen if you mix together a bunch of the different bot rules into one chatfish amalgam

[@dragononfire9862]

You should make a turnament with the bot but it randomly changes the values So you get like an evolution of optimization

[@theominouspigeon]

will you ever add 4pc (4 player chess) to Deckmate

[@pncka]

Chatfish was a lost cause, but now chat can ruin your bot!

[@HEHEHHEHEHEHEHEHEHUH]

Chat vs chat fish

[@frisk-jl6zg]

This is crazy how recent the stream was

[@FootballEditsByHim]

Where can we play all of your chess variants?

[@AtPurri]

2:57 im somewhere in this video

[@Adamiscrackedmyguy]

Correct

[@eljesser3418]

I hate it when my bishop switches sides to white

[@joona546]

You should make a video teaching us how to code these bots.

[@Auzdin]

Probably not

[@dragononfire9862]

My suggestion: -100 if blunders peace or makes a mistake

[@oliverscott2721]

nice

[@Un_wey_Random-h]

Hey are you planning about a port of mobile of deckmate?

[@kautilyaconcepts]

When will you make 2.0?

[@dupqi]

Why no body trust me bruh

[@diamondnether90]

Is there any way to play the bots?

[@CryptiCLT]

Hello 2:nd

[@yifansun2596]

Interesting video (First :D)

[@PawsitionalPlay]

3rd

[@ReenaRaniSahooUcskmschoolBhiwa]

First

[@number1-willstetsonsimp]

GET OUT