Can Su-35 survive against the stealthy F-35?

[@beng7844]

A note: second pair of F-35 wouldn’t ever need to turn on their radar, as the AMRAAM can now be fired to track targets via datalink

[@Gabriel333_]

Can you elaborate a bit?

[@Cheese_Boi1986]

@@Gabriel333_ they fire the missile and someone else directs it

[@Gabriel333_]

@@Cheese_Boi1986 Like an ATGM?

[@Cheese_Boi1986]

@@Gabriel333_ na most likely by another radar either the ground or awacs

[@Gabriel333_]

@@Cheese_Boi1986 interesting technology

[@LRRPFco52]

Fundamental flaw in the premises of this scenario is Su-35 cruising at Mach 1.8 with full combat load of missiles and bombs. That just isn't going to happen. Even Mach 1 cruise with that load would suck gas at too fast of a rate to provide for a viable combat radius. The other fundamental flaw is the F-35 operating as an interceptor, which it isn't meant for. F-22 rules that roost, and you don't want to show the scenario for F-22 against any of the Su-27 variants.

[@Aaron-wq3jz]

Most likely it will be f35 intercepting and it probably has a better chance than a f15

[@LRRPFco52]

@ANUSH SLAVEIKOV In the 4th decade of highly matured helmet-cued HOBS missiles, any time you see someone talking about dog fighting, you immediately know their level of familiarity with modern air combat. The truth is Cy-35C is flying blind against 5th Gen systems, and they know it.

[@LRRPFco52]

@ANUSH SLAVEIKOV I know most people don't have any familiarity with aerospace concepts, applied physics, and the environmental conditions that aircraft are normally subjected to, so I'll point out something you might not be aware of. As you increase in altitude, the air temperature gets very cold. At only 3000m above sea level, the air is already -5˚ C. At 7000m, it's roughly -24˚ C. 11000m, it's -56.5˚C Not only that, but the F-35 development program was subjected to the same Mil-Std protocols for arctic basing requirements, and is being stationed in Alaska as we speak, just like the F-22 has been for many years now. The F-35's RAM is more robust and weather-resilient than the F-22s, and F-22s have been operating from arctic conditions all this time. The truth is that any aircraft that is going to fly into the Geopotential of the tropopause needs to be able to operate in -56.5˚ C ambient air. This area is where the F-35 likes to be. Even in hot climates, once it gets into the higher altitude bands, it might as well be in the arctic because these are extremely low temperatures.

[@LRRPFco52]

@ANUSH SLAVEIKOV UK and US also, with early lot F-35s that have since worked out that problem. There were delamination issues if they sustained the maximum Mach for certain periods of time. That was relayed to the ODT&E people, who solved it and incorporated the fixes into later production samples. No need to make it personal if you didn't learn about this.

[@Aaron-wq3jz]

@RC213V please stop watching the propoganda

[@jaimea.3771]

He honestly deserves more subscribers

[@klardfarkus3891]

Funny how everyone is so certain of their assessments of these aircraft when all they know about them is the inflated claims of the manufacturers. Salesmen love you guys.

[@sylvesterbrock1905]

The Ospreys delivered as required. Hillary would still be waiting to see what response would poll the best. I remember Benghazi.

[@billsmith8605]

And the fact that the real capabilities, at least for the F 35 are still secret, yet everyone talks in absolutes like they are a Lockheed engineer.

[@773-o2n]

@@billsmith8605 yeah lol many of them exaggerated the f35

[@Superdj_1999]

You guys think they spend trillions to bluff?

[@Superdj_1999]

Also f-35 have a bigger advantage, they have DAS and that means detections from 800 miles away.

[@TimmacTR]

This guy knows what he's talking about for fuck's sake.. xD

[@keep22]

No he doesn't.

[@TimmacTR]

Horney Char ASMR lol why

[@davidmorris80]

TimmacTR Hes left out some aspects but yes he is roughfly on target.

[@keep22]

Read my response to him.

[@TimmacTR]

+Horney Char ASMR Well where the fuck is your response to him?

[@_Matsimus_]

How can people dislike this. The video is amazing

[@anguswaterhouse9255]

Salty rossians

[@familyacounttv6667]

What? You can't dislikes anymore, we live in a post dislikes world

[@Mikelo220]

@@familyacounttv6667 No, it's just hidden. You can use an extension to see dislikes.

[@Amin-ij6mi]

Iran vs Saudia arabia Please

[@hv7043]

Amin Alsous Saudi would be no where in the world map if Saudi vs Iran happens

[@Amin-ij6mi]

littes be real saudia arabia can wipe iran with there air force

[@The1RedRooster]

Not with the deployment of Russian S-3&400's in Iranian territory. Saudis do have the ground forces but air-power is out of the question.

[@metralla]

Saudia Arabia cannot even defeat a group of sandal wearing donkey herders, imagine what would happen against Iran.

[@satyampatel491]

America will support Iran over Saudi Arabia soon

[@bricejohnson4272]

Is this the Russian Kermit the Frog?

[@AgentSmith911]

His Russian cousin XDDD

[@JoeOvercoat]

Kermit's more worldly cousin.

[@Experiment-in1xe]

In Russia, Kermit teaches war to the children

[@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816]

wasnt he austrian?

[@nxshuu]

He from Croatia

[@Kouhiko9674]

Binkov should be in charge of an allied American and Russian military

[@Binkov]

Binkov is retired. Nowadays he promotes world peace.

[@patricioosuna9587]

Binkov's Battlegrounds what conflicts was he involved in while active duty?

[@devoyinator]

But what about when the aliens attack? We'll all need you then

[@nickn9040]

All of them.

[@gamelard1963]

binkov, you should have a game made. like a type of Total War game or Hearts of Iron type game. i would buy it.

[@defencebangladesh4068]

wow the comment section is really civilized.....

[@Thlormby]

Yeah, Im actually surprised no ones arguing. *Yet*.

[@Guide4Ever]

we will nuke you, middle east :D jk

[@memoochoa392]

I read the comment with an accent. lol

[@trap3400]

*Thats because Russians don't speak English*

[@davenewell9137]

Soviet Union vs United States before the collapse of the Soviet Union

[@laetrille]

dave newell YES!!!!

[@zoltancsikos5604]

dave newell Easy: the Warsaw Pact wins.

[@laetrille]

What time periodbm Nope, the Warsaw pact would initially set the initiative by quickly moving thousands of tanks and troops through the fulda gap, but NATOs technological and numbers advantage would slow and eventually stop the invaion. NATO would still not have enough power for a Counterattack butt they would have enough to stop a Soviet advance. This would buy time for the US 2 send carrier battle groups to the Mediterranean this would allowed the allies to flank Russian forces and pave the way for a Counterattack.

[@TheRobster2007]

Lol, you've been reading too much Tom Clancy kid. Pact forces would easily have made it across Germany and thus triggering NATO's nuclear strike policy.

[@davenewell9137]

Freely Liberal unless you have never seen any previous vids this guy made, no nuke and no allies is part of the deal

[@FelixstoweFoamForge]

Just discovered this channel; great stuff! I especially like the way Binkov uses realistic missile performance rather than a "lock on = a kill" approach. Too many people don't realise that when a missile is quoted as having a XXkm maximum range, that's from a front-aspect, at a non-manoeuvring target. And the thing about stealth is that you're only stealthy until you do something aggressive. It's great to have, but doesn't give you a magic sheild. Once again, great content, my little Russian hand-puppet!

[@rushabhdoshi9532]

make a video on India vs Pakistan and China

[@XxAdamIsChaosxX]

Rushabh Doshi I would like to see that

[@Joesolo13]

Rushabh Doshi did you see v the turkey vs Russia ones? nationalist in either side will go nuts

[@rushabhdoshi9532]

Nope

[@rushabhdoshi9532]

***** that's sound great.. Because China will be have lots of difficulty to get into India because of Himalayan mountain..

[@unknownuser1385]

I can already tell you right now that China would rape India.

[@kachel313]

the Netherlands VS Belgium plz

[@subtitleaddict5343]

mef j Is not relationship good between two countries?

[@computerinsurgent1204]

There will no Belgium-Netherlands war. But there can break a civil war in Belgium out between Flanders and Wallonia. The Netherlands will support Flanders and France Wallonia.

[@Bigcheecho]

하성태 It is, but the guy has done a war between two currently friendly nations before with UK vs France

[@isunlloaoll]

Netherlands would win. The beligum don't have heavy armors (Tanks, light tanks), and the Beligum navy only consists of two frigates and some minesweeper. The Dutch have more soldiers, more equipments (destroyers, tanks, light tanks, more IFVS, oil tanker planes, attack submarines, and amphibious assault ships, etc. All of which beligum lack.)

[@computerinsurgent1204]

ARVIN At sea the Dutch will kick the Belgium in their ass. And on land too. But the Belgium air force is bigger than the Dutch air Force.

[@Survivaurbatchev]

Rafale Vs eurofighter!

[@FoxMikeHotel]

Homer Simpson there is actually no real situations where the Typhoon win, even in dogfight or bvr, but that would be interesting from Binkov that seems to kno what he's talking about most typhoon vs rafale videos are pretty innaccurate

[@NoFaithNoPain]

Not really. This is old information the Eurofighter is pretty much capable of every mission now and continuously evolving. They can be compared in that this scenario is about the fight after the strike. The Rafale really lacks radar range, seriously so. The Eurofighter would achieve lock on much sooner. The SU-35's paint a HUGE radar picture with the massive radar they have and so as soon as it is turned on they are a target at almost any range. They need to bulk out with numbers to overcome that issue. Therefore the Eurofighter would be a clear winner. The Rafale is just straight inferior. However, we don't know the F-35 radar range and resolution for lock-on and we don't know how stealthy it is. So this video is extremely speculative. However, I have spoken to a Eurofighter test pilot at BAe Warton and he is thinking in terms of a 9-1 kill ratio for the Eurofighter against the best Russian fighters (He has flown every NATO aircraft and the SU-30 and MIG-29).

[@etaylor495]

NoFaithNoPain I agree with you completely but a war against Russia would be more against quantity than quality probably.

[@FoxMikeHotel]

Shaun Mclaren not at all no, the Typhoon is way less capable, in every training against the Rafale, it gets smashed. and it's not properly multirole while Rafale is, while still being good in about every aspects. you clearly lack some knowledge on the subject

[@FoxMikeHotel]

Shaun Mclaren and Rafale is not cheaper at all

[@superfamilyallosauridae6505]

That USAF claim is from 2005...you know, when the F-35 hadn't even flown yet and they didn't know how stealthy it was going to be. Every time a USAF officer in the know has spoken about the F-35's stealthiness since, they've said it was stealthier than the F-22, while the source you used from 2005 for the RCS size claims the opposite.

[@elkhamlichi2558]

I was gonna say ''man it's gonna be hell in the comment section'' but not really Good job being civilised

[@ares106]

I'm impressed, this is surprisingly in depth analysis for a silly KZbin frog video.

[@nipponese]

I think he's a lizard?

[@TheMeelickMafia]

pepe the frong is now the new symbol for white supremacy

[@TheRyujinLP]

TheMeelickMafia Or so says the professional liars that make up the main stream media. Pepe is more the anti-establishment mascot now but since the establishment doesn't like that they're losing now, they just label their opposition "racist" or "basically Hitler (TM)" or my new favorite, "Everyone I don't like is a Russian hacker". So yeah, so while some dumb ass white racists use it they they are such a tiny minority calling Pepe a white supremest symbol is just as laughable as saying Elmo is a symbol of radical Islamic extremism just because it was found out a handful of Isis members liked Elmo.

[@ares106]

Fox Ace You mean like TheRyujinLP? :P

[@ares106]

Fox Ace That means being silly/mischievous in my smiley vocabulary.

[@SuperLusername]

Do Croatia vs the rest of the Earth

[@tibne2412]

That's not fair, Croatia would win easily.

[@lukagecko]

Hahaha brate si poludio. Tu nema pitanja, nasa pobjeda je garantirana.

[@SuperLusername]

petrallen Fair fights are for pussies

[@SuperLusername]

Luka Gecko Volim pitat gluposti, iako znam da svijet nema sanse protiv nasa 2 aviona i 3 ispravna tenka.

[@HeyImLarry]

The commissar would destroy us all.

[@HotaruZoku]

Props for not jumping on the F-35 hate bandwagon. God is that tiring. Interestingly realistic scenario here. None of that "The Su out dogfights the F-35 = It's a better aircraft." There's way more to both the equipment and the situations involved than that, as reflected here.

[@kenworthNH]

It was refreshing. The Lightning is going to be a brutal jet to go against. People above calling it a "bomber" and saying it can't dogfight are on the hate bandwagon. Likely they'll never get off it either.

[@heesingsia4634]

You used to work for Sesame Street right?

[@wajihrehman9965]

Yep

[@misamisatv]

Hey random stranger scrolling through the comments... Wish you a happy new year

[@misamisatv]

lol who said i wanted any likes. I can tell 2017 is going to be a GOOD year fo you with your bad attitude (/sarcasm). xD

[@bnblasercleaning]

Thanks mate.

[@raygiordano1045]

Thanks! Happy New Year, stranger, hope everything works out well for you.

[@AlfBR6]

Thanks unknown stranger, happy new year to you too

[@bromazepam781]

HNY to you too, cure avatar guy/gal.

[@lhugueny]

I love your channel Binkov! Keep up these great videos :)

[@DavidWatersJames]

Binkov is really a CIA TROLL. Always biased toward the WEST.

[@davidpost6164]

It looks like your the opposite end of the Spectrum Russian Santa Cause with an American Name.

[@Nobody-ob5od]

@@DavidWatersJames so what it’s facts

[@kidpagronprimsank05]

No, by the time Su-35 get into the range that its radar can detect F-35 (they use the word low-observable for F-117, B-2, F-22 and F-35 for the reason) F-35 will blasted that Su-35 out of the sky well before that

[@DNowlan1]

Binkov - many thanks for sharing this and for taking the time to look into this. That being said I have a few questions for you. It's no great military secret that the stealth shaping of the F-35 is optimised in the X-Band and above in the forward aspect only. On side view this breaks down quite drastically leaving the F-35 open for detection, particularly if their flying combat spread of 60km+ across. Did you take that into consideration? As a case in point LockMart are so nervous in the late 2000's they wouldn't let Danish test pilots fly that type of formation in the simulator. The other thing to consider is the IR signature of the F-35. You may or may not be aware of the rubber insulation for the fuel cooling breaking down for the wing tanks. So at 30000 ft and above you have a differential of 140 deg C over a wing area of 42.7m^2. This would drastically increase the range the IR sensors would detect the F-35. Did you take that into consideration?

[@elijahjoseph3617]

can you do m1 abrams vs t90?

[@andrewforman6324]

Elijah Joseph Abrams by a longshot

[@AR-bk3di]

Andrew Forman The M1 Abrams is technically better, but the t90 is nearly half the cost.

[@wgoulding]

Elijah Joseph Wouldn't make an interesting video, it would just be M1A2's sniping T-90's from afar.

[@wgoulding]

M1A2's would still win with with a 1:2 ratio.

[@poop75018]

Dont the T-90s have a longer range gun and missile capability though?

[@Jinseual]

This is like a sesame street for war gamers.

[@commanderroddi7742]

about ranges: F-35's missiles (AIM-120D AMRAAM) have a range of 75+ cvt; that's at the far end of the range. However, it is unlikely that the SU-35 would detect the Lightnings on radar (or IR seasons) until the lightnings are within 20 to 40 miles, well within a very lethal envolope of the Lightnings. Furthermore, it is likely that the rear pair of lightnings would use the radar to track and illuminate the Flankers, and while the Flankers would think the threat is further away, (Let say, 60 to 80 nmi or even 100, or at the far end, 200 miles?) the missiles are coming from, let say, much less than 40 nmi). AIM-120s won't start illuminating with their own seekers until the terminal phase of the attach, so that may give Lightning a further edge if the SU-35s don't detect the launch of the AMRAAMs, but even if they do and considering the effectiveness of AMRAAMs, , I think it is Very unlikely the Flankers would ever fire first, and by the time they're aware of an enemy, the Lightning may have fired all their misses and be pulling back for the second pair to attack from a different location. Tactics like this have scored 15 to 1 kill rations for F-35 against non-stealth (But very capable, aggressor pilots at RED FLAG (who are some of the best pilots int the world)). The Kill ration for F-22 with similar tactics is even more impressive in simulated combat against non-stealthaircraft. . I think this scenario, video, while interesting, gives too much credit to the SU-35's ability to shoot first, and detect the Lightnings, and ignores how big of an advantage stealth and stealth tactics make in such a defensive scenario. Yeah, I disagree that Lightnings would launch at the "edge" Maybe if lightnings used the older AMRAAMs with 50 nmi but the newer D variant they use would be far from the "extreme" range. I'm doubtful a single Lightnings would be lost in the defensive scenario for the lightnings., while I belie all SU-35s would get wipe before reaching the target.

[@СерхиоБускетс-ф7я]

The SU-35 radar sees targets with an RCS of 0.1-0.5 (this corresponds to F22 in different frontal projections) at a distance of about 250 kilometers. F35 probably has a higher RCS, so it will be visible further. The Su-35 has R37M missiles with a launch range of 300 kilometers and a speed of Mach 6. It can also transmit data to air defense systems. F22 is visible at a distance of 100 kilometers in the infrared range for the SU-35. SU 35 has a radar with a viewing angle of 120 degrees (2 times more than that of US aircraft). Air defense sees stealth aircraft from the ground at a distance of 300-400 kilometers. The radio horizon at an altitude of 5 kilometers is 250 kilometers, air defense will see such an aircraft at this altitude and is capable of destroying . US and NATO aircraft have no chance against Russia near the borders with Russia.

[@Wayoutthere]

The only war is in the comments section haha. Be prepared for cancer

[@danijelzubic1430]

Wouter d.B.

[@TheOne-he9bk]

Wouter d.B. And the cancer will not give for the chemucals of the planes. They launch in or contries. THE MILITARY OF THE UNITED ESTATES LAUNCH THE CHEMTRAILS.

[@TheOne-he9bk]

THE RUSIAN MISSULES ARE FOOL? DO NOT THINK SO. AND THE MISSILES GRINGOS ARE ONLY THE SMART ONES HA HA HA HA. PURE LIES.

[@wadopotato33]

There is no such thing as chemtrails. There are contrails and they are nothing but water vapour/crystals. Get your head out of your ass. I suppose the world is also flat... "Contrails are line-shaped clouds produced by aircraft engine exhaust or changes in air pressure, typically at aircraft cruise altitudes several miles above the Earth's surface. Contrails are composed primarily of water, in the form of ice crystals." The only remotely close thing is the US's use of agent Orange to kill vegetation in Vietnam. The side effects of that weren't fully understood at the time, but are very real.

[@notme-y1m]

Best comment

[@cruelroalex6722]

i was wondering how a direct confrontation between Europe and Russia will go... with no US interference... let's say that US sais: ''guys, we're tired of fighting wars for everybody....we're out on this one''.... cause EU is hard on sanctioning Russia and blaming it for everything...so i would like to know if they can back their claims in war scenario without running behind US's skirt...

[@kokofan50]

Mad Max, no war in human history has ever been fought for purely altruistic reasons.

[@cruelroalex6722]

Mad Max in all fairness, they did save our asses twice... 3 if you count Bin Laden... hell! 4 if you count Hillary....

[@cruelroalex6722]

Mad Max a direct war with Russia....where Europe would've been caught in the middle...

[@cruelroalex6722]

Mad Max i'm talking about the US election, damn it!

[@venkatramakkineni]

Without US, I am not sure those sanctions will last a second. The sanctions on Russia serve one purpose, they keep US the unchallenged bully of the world !!

[@AllYourBaseRBelong2Us]

I think you may be overestimating the Su's speed advantage given its external stores and its ability to find/lock the F-35

[@99Yeti]

And how in Ukraine they have gpses glued to the cockpit

[@peterjenkins6837]

It's a fairly good analysis, but it doesn't correctly model how the SU-35's speed and maneuverability are limited when carrying a full weapons load. The SU-35s carrying the ground attack weapons would be especially affected.

[@Violent2aShadow]

California vs Texas!

[@MilesStratton]

I am okay with this as a californian. our guys would probably be too busy struggling with the bullet buttons and mag locks to reload anyway...

[@bestamerica]

Violent2aShadow California vs Texas! ' it is a one north america... no need state

[@rajatvinerkar7651]

hey binknov plz do a video on India vs Pakistan

[@gomes8335]

rajat vinerkar India vs China as well

[@masterm8816]

rajat vinerkar China vs Japan

[@nickn9040]

Agreed! This would be a great choice!

[@wgoulding]

Japan would have a hard time, they're pacifistic and would need US help in the long term.

[@gelmir7322]

1 vs 1 Japan dont stand a chance against China. Chinese Navy could easily employ naval blockade around Japan cutting of its access to strategic resources such as oil and steel.

[@somezsaltz4526]

i like how do don't favor on side over another

[@SiimAlas]

Same here :D

[@Thessaloz]

To be honest here, F35 probably have better electonics than we saw. In this situation they won't lose so many planes. Especially on the defence

[@glennfrazier4873]

Thessaloz George he gave a 2 to 1 kill ratio AGAINST su35, and you think because it's american and cool it would do better? if you asked any f35 pilots if he was at war with russians flying su35s and they would lose 2 f35 but kill all the enemy, they wouldn't like it, but they take that win.

[@herewardofliverpool1662]

Personally if Liverpool fc win the premiership title this season i`ll take them all on with a Sopwith camel , a cigar, a Union Jack flag and a Browning 9mm pistol.:)

[@amirulfarhan919]

so 5th generation fighter have a bad day vs 4.5 generation fighter

[@amirulfarhan919]

just think what Pak Fa can do to F 35...

[@jasontownsend9460]

Amirul Farhan well what the pak-fa can or can't do is more or less unknown and unproven at this stage. They have only 8 prototypes at the moment. The pak Fa is Russia's first stealth aircraft. The f35 is the US' 5th. The US has a track record with its other stealth airframes and have made much more progress on the f35 than the Russians have on the pak fa.

[@овсянкапетрович]

Amirul Farhan- Су-35с свободно сделает F-35

[@neutron9555]

+Amirul Farhan Pak Fa can punch hole through the sun, then make a black hole in it and throw all evil western f35 planes inside of it, as soon as it gets its engines finished.

[@neutron9555]

Actually in last red flag f35 scored 20/1 against g16s. F35 pilots were newbs and f16 pilots were top guns.

[@KesMonkey]

Why does this scenario have air superiority fighters flying a strike mission and strike fighters flying an interception mission? Weird.

[@jmarronineto]

Indeed!

[@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816]

a better scenario would be the F-35 doing the strike mission, and the su-35 defending. both are multirole, but that doesnt mean they will be used for all roles most of the time. most likely, an f-35 will be used offensively anyway. it was designed primarily for offence not defence. also binkov didnt really take into account the fact that defending aircraft dont stay in one place. they actually move around across large areas, and in multiple large groups too. likewise, an attacking force would have to be large. a small group of strike aircraft wont do. usually youd use 2-3 times more aircraft when mounting an attack. also, youd need combined arms. just air power alone wont be enough. considering all this, the chances of a fight breaking out suddenly at the flanks is very likely. both sides might not even meet head on.

[@therealmp40]

@@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 Well, but the point is to see how they would perform in a dogfight against each other. You could even argue that realistically they wouldn't even engage in combat because if a war ever is declared between Russia and NATO, the nukes would drop before their jet engines spool up.

[@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816]

@@therealmp40 the comment above makes a better dogfight scenario that is realistic.

[@mkd2839]

@@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 That's in part 2. This is to assess both in offense and defense

[@blindfoldblaster]

Flat earth “theory” just got busted at 0:51

No one takes them seriously anyway. It's like those people who think Jesus buried dino bones to fuck with anthropologists.

[@Its_shiki_time4876]

you are very good at your job

[@leo333333able]

he seems to really know his shit

[@littleredbull1140]

Can you do Russia vs Europe?

[@gnochhuos645]

+A Ginger Ewok USA won against Russia alone on Binkov's older video so you should remove the ally part

[@unknownentity2617]

Well the Russia vs USA battle he did was only an arena battle that put each country right next to each other unrealistically. The USA vs CHINA video had mobilization as a factor since it showed that the US could only realistically move so many forces overseas. Id like to see a video showing NATO forces throughout Europe, and how each force would ultimately react should war break out.

[@littleredbull1140]

+Vietnam Mapper That is very true, I think it would actually be better without USA's support, thanks 👍

[@flyingdutchman6330]

true we don't need some Americans throwing nukes around

[@laetrille]

You forgot to include that the F-35 can target and fire Standard Missiles from navy ships. Also, you have to take in to account that the F-35s APG-81 is magnitues more powerful than the SU-35s PESA radar.

[@keep22]

That's the SM-6. And current F-35's can't do that until block 4.

[@laetrille]

Horney Char ASMR Ok, but the capability is deployed on some F-35s, during a test a few months ago, the capability was demonstrated. www.raytheon.com/news/feature/sm-6_first_of_a_kind.html

[@laetrille]

www.raytheon.com/news/feature/sm-6_first_of_a_kind.html

[@laetrille]

Horney Char ASMR Join me on Google+ lets create a anti Russian troll army

[@keep22]

laetrille That was the test plane. It has the software to guide SM-6 missiles beyond the horizon. The aircraft that has that capability right now are the E-2D Hawkeye's. And every Carrier Strike Group that deploys near "concern areas" always has a E-2 in the air. That bird has a 400+km detection and tracking capability.

[@bobc4368]

nice job 😁

[@skeletonwguitar4383]

Seeing how Indonesia's Sukhois purchase is in jeopardy, and the government is begging the US to sell Indonesia F-35 after making pressuring them to cancel, this is going to be a baseline overview of which one is "better" or "good" But with my personal bias... GET THE SUKHOIS PLZ

[@blenderanimation2601]

Your air force have prior experience with SU 27&30

[@Hoosier_Boy]

I'm surprised they are using the F-35 as a counter measure as a more practical fighter would be the F-22 Raptor. The F-35 is more of a ground/bomber. (As it was designed for.)

[@solidsnake6206]

Ken s that's what I'm saying su35 is more superior in dogfights then a f35.

[@desertdude8274]

Solid Snake F 35 isnt designed for dogfighting.. This was stated . Dogfighting is being phased out with accurate missle systems.

[@wadopotato33]

The F-35 is actually a capable dogfighter, although it does it in a different way. In Red Flag events it did extremely well against fourth generation aircraft. The F-16 and F-15 have trouble locking onto it.

[@anthonysaponaro6318]

Nobody truly knows the absolute capabilities of the F-35

[@VT-mw2zb]

Made in U.S.A: that was sort of the mistake with the F4 having no gun, only missiles, which led to losses to Mig-21s. On the other hand, the F35 concept: a big, powerful radar equipped plane with tons of missiles are constrained by the aircraft's configuration. Modern radars can be very powerful, however, they had to fit within the nose cone of a fighter aircraft. AWACS are commercial jet-sized planes with big radars that can easily outrange most puny radars in fighters' nose cone. With the technology to link and communicate targeting information up and down the chain, missile armed planes can rely on bigger AWACS radar for targeting. Better yet, why not bigger missiles? Why not bigger aircrafts with bigger radars and missiles with longer range? Assuming the missile work, an AWACS-sized aircraft with powerful radar + super long range missiles can outrange any F35. Just ad a thin crust of short range, gun armed fighters just in case. Not my original ideas. Better man than I stated the case: www.the-american-interest.com/2007/09/01/breaking-the-bank/

[@PhilipMReeder]

One thing you left out/missed. AWACS. AWACS is another level of radar coverage (airborne) which enables friendly aircraft to receive real time data and radar lock, while not risking detection by using its own radar. This mixed with the F35's superior IR detection HAS to increase its effectiveness and survivability. But overall, a good video!

[@isodoublet]

You're ignoring one thing though. Russian. Hackers.

[@SuperGeronimo999]

Chinese hackers are far worse...

[@isodoublet]

SuperGeronimo999 Russian hackers would hack the f-35s and make them explode in midair.

[@MrQwerman]

avicenna and make them vote for Trump, I assume?

[@isodoublet]

MrQwerman You got it! Damn those deplorable f-35s.

[@SuperGeronimo999]

avicenna Don't forget they steered the airliners into world trade center too.

[@siegfred4868]

F35A got 145 confirm kills and 7 losses in an Exercise.

[@2017NationalChamps]

This didn't age well.

[@bizzwoofer]

Very interesting. Well-done editing.

[@Razielmn]

china vs Russia would be interesting. Who's with?

[@playeralive137]

W/o Nuclear china win

[@Chiyenworkout]

South Korea VS North korea

[@bestamerica]

Art of street work out South Korea VS North korea ' both koreans are still same one korean language

[@Yp3ri0n]

If you want to be realistic and fair , try one Su-35 vs 10 F-35

[@thomasD215]

The su 35 has no chance against the f35 not a chance. The f35 would own them before the su even knew it was there

[@javier8341]

@@thomasD215 f-35 is a useless arcraft today for the news radars incomming, in a dogfiht su-35 can beat them easily mig-35 too. and f-35 is too slow for escape away from a df.

[@miroslavstefanov9196]

@@thomasD215 they said that even 30 years old F 16 beats the F 35 in dog fight. F 35 is more like electronics warfare jet. The thing is they are not fully invisible they can be detected by most Russian radars because the F 35 is dependent on the radar absorbing coating and it's shape isn't made at all to reflect the radar waves as some other "stealth" jets before it. For the radar coating that absorbs the radar waves must be as thick as the waves length which means that on lower frequency radars with few meters length of the wave it need few meters of coating to absorb it which is impossible to put on the jet thus it can probably be detected by waves with length of 10-20 cm. This is why the russians didn't try to make a stealth jet for so many years but if they had the US tech it would probably be more beneficial to them because US mostly uses precision radars with much shorter waves. Before you go yapping bullshit go and do some reading on how shit works🙄🙄

[@timmyburden5701]

​@@miroslavstefanov9196 The SU35 will easily show up on the F35 radar. Also thanks to the link it will also show up on every F35 in the area. The F35 will be very hard for the Su35 to detect. Allowing the F35 to fire their missiles first and having a huge advantage. He who fires first usually wins. By the time the Su knows its being fired upon its probably to late to do much.

[@Dwight511]

Battle between Su-35 vs F-35 at BVR is determined by the MRAAMs that they posses. (R-77-1 vs AIM-120D) AIM-120D utterly destroys the R-77-1 in performance. F-35 will win most of the time. The Su-35s need to develop a tactic that will enable them to get closer to the F-35 before the fight begins. Otherwise it's absolutely ineffective, the R-77-1 won't do shit!!!

[@ivanbuljanvanboelken4676]

Well what kick ass video. Superb.

[@shabdikacharyya2516]

During the Pakistan India standoff in 2019 pak f16d launched over 6 ammram at the su30's. Not a single missile got a chance to their target.while in between a MiG-21 managed to get a R73 lock on to a f16 and took it down. Note- The su 30s had a top speed of around mach 1.9 where as the f16s has around mach 2.1 Some people say this was just luck while some compared the pilots training skills. I would say the west has too much confidence in its equipments but in practical that simple doesn't matter. N.B- And binkov will never change he will always stand with the western fancy equipments.

[@stanleywong58]

The expert analysis (whatever value you may put on them) was that the Pak AIM 120s were fired at range at the Su30 MKIs . While this produced no hits, the Su30s were deterred from closing to launch their own BVRs (this not being an "all-out" engagement). If that were true, the mainstay of the IAF fighter fleet had been effectively neutralised by a weaker opponent possessing a relative handful of AIM 120s. Indian sources write that their Aster should be a partial solution until more Meteors are acquired.

[@stephenduxfield-karyakin3778]

First off I'd like to say I like your video, it is well made and you clearly have researched everything thoroughly. Having said that, I can't quite agree with your conclusions. To start with, it is impossible to believe that high value targets, in a tense geopolitical situation and with 4 F 35s flying CAP would not have continuous AWACS support. The AWACS aircraft that should be there would spot the incoming Sukhois many hundreds of miles away, and with the F35's data fusion capabilities they could maneuver into optimum firing position against the Sukhois and launch their AMRAAMs without ever even turning their own radars on, mid course guidance would be provided by AWACS. The only warning the Sukhois would have would be when the AMRAAM terminal seeker heads go active, and this would be mere seconds before impact. Avoiding missile impact would be miraculous in this case, and the Sukhois would almost certainly be wiped out. If we were to accept your scenario and have the F35s unsupported by AWACS (unrealistic as that is), I also cannot accept the Sukhois having a firing solution on the F35s with their R77s more or less concurrent with the F35s getting firing solutions on the Sukhois. The AMRAAM that will be used on the F35 is the AIM120D, which will without any doubt have a longer range than the R77. Additionally, your scenario envisages the Sukhois coming in at low level to avoid, or at least minimize, radar detection. This will work for the ground based radars (the Sukhois will be flying below the radar horizon) but won't work for the F35s' radar. A fully armed Sukhoi Su35 is not in the least bit stealthy, and the F35 will have no problem detecting it at very long range, particularly as the Sukhois will be flying over the sea. Seeing as the F35s will be flying at high altitude and transonic or even supersonic, the F35s will be in theoretical AMRAAM range substantially sooner than the low and slow Sukhois will with their already inferior R77s. The Sukhois will be fired upon repeatedly for several minutes before they can even think about firing back, and that's assuming they will even be able to detect the F35s. You say also that the Su35 enjoys a speed advantage over the F35. This is true if both planes are flying clean at the same altitude, but in your scenario the Sukhois are flying at low level (where the air is thicker) and with wing stations fully used (creating drag). The F35s on the other hand are flying clean (as all armament is carried internally) and at high altitude (where the air is thinner). They will easily outperform the Sukhois for speed. Lastly you are very optimistic that the Sukhois will detect the F35s with their own radar at such range. The F35 may not be quite as stealthy as say the F22, but it is still a low observable design, and (when the F35 points its nose at the emitting radar, offering its smallest cross section, which it will be doing in your scenario) it won't be picked up on radar until it is very close, likely much closer than the scenario envisages. This means the Sukhois won't even see anything to shoot at for many minutes, while being shot at from unseen enemies and likely taking serious losses.

[@aidenmcknight2884]

They said that the planes ascend once the ground radar detects them

[@spawnpeekcentral1399]

Jesus, that was very informative thanks

[@DashFlicks]

an astute observation, hats off to you. however, It is important to point out, that the Russian armada rebuilds as a defensive force built for continental offensives with subs and other strategic weapons, including bio, as naval offensive weapons. Russian territorial geometry and position speaks for itself. It will likely build one or two aircraft carriers in the future for peace time missions only. I doubt f-35 tech will remain stealth for longer than a decade, giving the lidar tech advance. both domestic engine designs will likely be modified and kept secret. Dogfights are more or less matter of the past and F35 is primarily a strategic bomber. I find this scenario probable but it wont be critical. imo, strategic maritime routes will be defended with subs, if at all. In the end, numbers will decide the all-out wars and simplicity of weapons, output and repair output, logistics and supply lines are more important than slight tech differences, as seen in nearly all previous major world conflicts. Any of these scenarios has to be post nuclear. There is absolutely zero chance of US-RU conflict without at least two waves of all out nuclear salvos with active AWACS and Hi altitude weapons as primary target.

[@blackjack.888]

Why do you still firmly believe in the relevance of stealth technology, the downed F-117 has long put an end to this technology . Stealth technologies are more or less effective against third-country radars operating in the X-band of 8-12 GHz, and locators on ultrashort waves of 30 MHz-3 GHz perfectly see invisible planes. The Pentagon is well aware of this , but if you officially recognize the failure of this technology in modern realities, it means huge financial losses of defense enterprises

[@mikaels6009]

All that and Serbs shot down a stealth b2 bomber in the 90s lol. Bro stop thinking, with all you analytics, the Russia's just can't simply compete. It's extreme naiveness.

[@blackmesa232323]

Say what you will about the F-35, the fact that it has a tiny radar cross section really does give it quite advantage.

[@ossusmaximus226]

Thank you admiral BINKOV!

[@gabrielviana369]

Brazil vs Venezuela (Brazil with the Gripen NGs)

[@exioz99]

Gabriel Viana brazil is a shit hole

[@gabrielviana369]

Ballistus lol no

[@1MuchButteR1]

South Brazil is pretty developed. North Brazil is just favela land.

[@gabrielviana369]

1MuchButteR1 lol, North Brazil is just jungle, the favelas are just in Rio

[@Guncriminal]

Venezuela is screwed financially, so I don't see how it can fight a war.

[@AdurianJ]

F35 in a NATO setting benefit for the massive air to air refueling capability of that alliance.

[@krism4276]

The SU-35 needs to replace it's Irbis PESA radar with a more powerful AESA radar, like the Zhuk AE, or the one mounted on the Pak-Fa

[@wgoulding]

Kristi Mitri AESA's are super expensive (~40-60 million). Russia lacks the funds to do that, especially with sanctions and low oil and gas prices (they make up ~50% of the budget). Russia would do better to spend it on better training, and probably on better ground forces. There was a joke amongst NATO officers during the Cold War that went like this: Two Soviet generals run into each other in a Paris cafe. One asks the other, "By the way, who won the air war?"

[@krism4276]

+Wynton Goulding Goddammit I knoe

[@wgoulding]

Victor Katilis ?

[@UltraTotenkopf]

@@wgoulding *Tell this joke to American pilots who flew in Korea and Vietnam, and ask what the losses of the US Air Force during these conflicts are! ;-)*

[@wgoulding]

@@UltraTotenkopf 😂 Vietnam was bad, but only in comparison to the kill:loss ratio's of what came before (Korea) and after (Gulf War). There was still a 3.8:1 kill ratio against Migs in Vietnam, and before that in Korea, it was 5.6:1. And let's not ignore the fact that while Soviet planes were in general of cheaper / lower quality than western planes, the west were still able to produce comparable numbers of planes if not more due to the large aerospace industry. Also, a point that needs to be made is that in both conflicts, look at who owned the airspace over the battlefield. It's not the Chinese/North Koreans, and not the North Vietnamese. In neither conflicts did US forces come under any significant air attack, while in both conflicts, the allied air forces were able to provide close air support without fear of enemy fighters. The only real danger was in bombing raids deep in enemy territory. Even then, western pilots, planes, doctrine, and support personnel outperformed their opponents consistently.

[@Koshzor]

Great analysis! Really good job.

[@LordDarthHarry]

Angry Russians incoming at 5.....4.....3.....2....

[@Dwight511]

No... the only thing to be angry at is irrational moronic idiots like you who claim something is better than another without analysis, sources and logical reasoning. Unfortunately that's 99% of people commenting on YT. This video is good, but it could have been at least backed up by simulations(Command: Air/Naval ops application) instead of model assumptions. Also, don't forget that in this scenario the F-35 was supported by ground based radars which gives them a huge advantage.

[@LordDarthHarry]

Im jsut saying. They come in raging whenever Russia doesnt dominate in these scenarios. Remember the "Turkey vs Russia" videos. They were raging there because it wasnt a total steamroll victory. (angry Turkish nationalists were also raging of course)

[@nickn9040]

Sorry to go off topic from the rage but holy Hell Command is complex. It's great fun but just keeping up with the tutorial is difficult.

[@romeor6231]

That was the whole point. To see how they would do on the defense. While the next video they will be on the attack. So your last point is moot.

[@ghostrider.49]

+LordDarthHarry Funny thing I was scrolling down here and I didn't see a single angry Russian hahahaha, yeah right man... And you are comparing Turks to Russians ? Turks rage on like fucking crazy ! On every single *someone* vs Turkey video they rage. Russians are tiny in comparison to the angry brainwashed crazy Turks. Every second comment I see is from a proud Turkish nationalist, and only a matter of them from the Russians. Besides, 99% of those Russians are also trolling, learn to take it lol. P.S. Not from a Russian :)

[@StanislavLuminous]

3:02 Radar cross section in Bdsm :-D

[@mrmr2055]

😕

[@AirShark95]

Chile vs Peru

[@Juanfernandoz]

gana bolivia.

[@jesusf.2600]

AirShark95 GANA CHILE.

[@Juanfernandoz]

irrelevant racist bitch

[@carlosszr]

Another great analysis. Gratz

[@boyteebah3794]

please do a guns dogfight between su-35 and f-35

[@rowandoggo]

boy teebah but that's not a realistic scenario. the F35 was designed to launch missiles and drop bombs on targets. if you really want a dogfight scenario, Su-35 vs F-22 Raptor

[@oguz4070]

you re quite right

[@carlitosXCool]

F-22 Raptor would annihilate Su-35, that's not fair man lmao

[@rowandoggo]

Victor Katilis​ WVR? Sorry, not everyone is privy to your acronyms.

[@flyingdutchman6330]

WVR is an acronym for within visual range, another word for it is dogfight and refers to air to air combat where both the combatants can see each other and they are trying to maneuver their noses into position to shoot the other down either using heat seeking missiles, cannons, or unlikely but possible radar guided missiles, this is like the dogfights you see in top gun.

[@Dolphin665784]

Su-37 vs Eurofighter Typhoon.

[@EvoSwatch]

Su-37 is only a technology demonstrator

[@darthimperius8057]

Do Croatia vs Serbia :)

[@vladancekic6634]

slazem se

[@darthimperius8057]

Da i nas netko spomene :D

[@johnydomino]

Druže dosta je bilo tih zajebancija ovde..

[@bromazepam781]

A s cime bi se to bili? Nasi hameri iz donacija bi crkli negde oko Osijeka, dok bi njihova avijacija... cek', koja bre avijacija? Oba aviona su im pala. Dakle, nema rata, jer nema s cime.

[@bromazepam781]

Zapravo, gresim - mogli bi da naoruzamo vojske blokovima cokolade sa rizom (Hrvati KRAS-ovu "Dorinu" a mi Pionirov "Mony"), pa da se vojnici gadjaju njima.

[@dynomania]

War games have the F35 v non stealth around 15-1 in favour of the former so your scenario is probably highly optimistic for the SU. Great video tho.

[@sentinelmoonfang]

Wargames and training exercises are very different from real combat in that you're locking on a missile then calling the target dead. As the video mentions, the real world chance for those missiles to hit is far, far shy of 100%. There is a serious advantage for a plane with more missiles, in that making a defensive turn to avoid a missile bleeds off a ton of energy... so the second missile is much more likely to hit than the first and the third even more likely to hit than that... provided they're fired in somewhat rapid succession, as less airspeed and altitude offers the defender less chance to evade. The slower and less maneuverable F-35 has a comparatively low chance to evade missiles, especially on followup shots, because it has less energy to work with from the outset. The problem with the plane is that it doesn't DO anything. It doesn't have the speed to intercept enemy aircraft, it doesn't have the payload to effectively destroy them. It's not particularly good at attacking most ground targets with only bombs and no AGMs... which also makes it a woefully ineffective platform for engaging SAMs. It's no good for recon. At the time of writing this, the plane's 'amazing situational awareness' electronics lose ground targets constantly and are unable to re-acquire them. Proponents of the plane will boast that it doesn't have to engage any sort of threat and that it can just fly around them to complete its mission... but I'm still confused about what mission that might be exactly.

[@dynomania]

sentinelmoonfang su35s can't see the f35. The war games 15-1 kill ratio is against traditional slung missile fighter's. Similar to the Russian aircraft. In combat the lesser will be ducks on the pond.

[@sentinelmoonfang]

David Prince To shoot their AMRAAMs, the F-35 needs to utilize its radar, making it visible. The missiles are active, but they still need a target designated by the firing plane's radar. Moreover stealth does not mean real invisibility. They are still visible to radar, just hard to get a bead on. As I mentioned before, wargames don't actively depict how a real combat would work. They assume a 100% hit rate for missiles, when an AMRAAM has closer to a 30-40%. That's where the problem comes in. These planes will be admittedly outnumbered, but they don't carry the firepower to deal with a numerically superior foe. In reality it will take 2-3 missiles to kill an enemy, whereas in the wargames you refer to it takes one. They only have a payload to reliably destroy one plane. Two if they're lucky. If they load up with more missiles on wing pylons it reduces their stealth advantage and exacerbates their range, speed and maneuverability issues. And when they run out, then what do they do? They're too slow to run and their radar cross-section is much larger from behind. TL;DR: Achieving a lock and calling 'mort' over the radio is very, very different from getting a missile to actually hit. I would be a far larger fan of the aircraft if it was outfitted with the ability to launch AGM-88's, from the outset, because I think it would make a great SEAD aircraft, but only carrying bombs really ruins the wild weasel sort of role for it. Stealth for deep interdiction especially against the new generation of super lethal Russian SAMs, is great, but stealth at the expense of speed, range and missile capacity is not a good trade-off for a fighter.

[@realdxb]

Famous "highly likely"

[@moch.fadilpratamaputra1144]

how can SU-35 with no strategy>? this is just F-35 perspective

[@JoeOvercoat]

Before I head on over to Part 2/2 I just have to say the Su-35 is simply gorgeous. The F-35...not so much.

[@Wasattsi]

This comment confuses me. I find it to be the exact opposite, with the F-35 looking sleek and beautiful while the Su-35 reminds me of a nose.

[@brandowag3]

But most flight patterns have multiple aerial assets. Speed, naval support, strike assets. I take the US every day. A stealth, jam, cruise and destroy.

[@itsdimitriymedvedyev]

4.5 gen Su-35 vs 5th gen F-35. Next do T-50 PAK FA 5th gen vs F-35 or F-22.

[@maxklinger1494]

It would fare a bit better, but it still lags behind in some key areas.

[@sparkyplug28]

funkierfawn budgie very little point when Russia only have 3

[@КирилКирилов-щ4к]

No need for airplanes. Sylvester Stallone (Rambo) and Chuck Norris will all deal with all the armies in the world.

[@truerespect4247]

Russia VS United Kingdom, No nukes

[@hobbyistcontrarian4389]

The Russian Navy would be obliterated, and then the war would end because invasion by either side is logisticallh impossible.

[@Sinisterium-YT]

Hobbyist Contrarian nah, russian navy is one of the best in the world, russia would easily win with an invasion of the British islsnd

[@hobbyistcontrarian4389]

Joseph Stalin No, the Russian Navy is a mess. Most of its ships are mothballed, sitting in port, flying an ensign so that their skeleton crews are entitled to be paid, gently rusting. Just look at the awful service history of the _Admiral Kuznetsov_. Not to mention the Russian economy is crumbling under the mildest of EU sanctions.

[@Thlormby]

Russia would brutally beat the UK down. It has almost more of everything than the UK does, including power.

[@truerespect4247]

Cannon Fodder I dont know they would need a navy to invade britian, and thats wont be happening with britians defence and russias rusty navy

[@11tigerclaw11]

Things that you need further consideration: *LPI radar modes. *Internal jammers being used much earlier in the engagement. F-pole advantages. Also the R-77/K-77M is not dependent on the firing aircraft only for mid course corrections.

[@globaltrident5341]

US being the attacker would be more realistic, as history shows.

[@claytontaylor5577]

Apparently you haven't looked at Russian history on war.. It well surpasses the U.S... In recent years yes the U.S. is the aggressor but in total history it doesn't come close to Russia..

[@globaltrident5341]

@@claytontaylor5577 You've only watches history channel.

[@claytontaylor5577]

@@globaltrident5341 I lived in Europe for a while and visited military museums in Moscow and you clearly are clueless. Actually do an honestly good research and then make a comment. Facts are facts regardless if you don't agree. I love and respect both countries due to my mother being from Russia and father from Texas. The U.S. has been in many wars back to back but you have to look at the entire age history of the country.

[@globaltrident5341]

@@claytontaylor5577 The difference between US and Russia is: USA was founded to rule the world and therefore needs wars. Russia is a normal country as any other of the world too and therefore has no interest in war. In a nutshell.

[@claytontaylor5577]

@@globaltrident5341 Russia many disputes with other countries over land even though its the biggest country by land mass.. Was many wars with their south neighbors taking land over the course of history.. recently Ukraine and Georgia and having disputes with Japan over land. Every country in the world wants to control their own destiny and be superior to others to gain influence for the better of their people its just some has the power to try to do so and some don't.. The Chinese dynasty,Turkish empire,Roman empire,Japan,Germany,Britain,Russia,Spain and the U.S. and many more All at some point now and throughout history has had global dominance through war and control. Eventually the U.S. will lose power and another will take its place as the super power and may possibly be worse. Everyone is a hater until it's their turn in history to control then defend their own reasons. Just most plays innocent until they have the power to change their course like China is doing now bullying its neighbors in the sea. You live in a fake reality to believe some countrys will always be innocent and some will always be evil..

[@Coyote_Cerrd]

i hope you know i watch f-35's fly over my house almost every day so i can learn about them and i bet they are gonna make the F-35 lightning II better! and the f-35 has a helping hand! just saying

[@phillipr61]

The F35 is nt a intercepter in the first! ..it can t do the job of an F15 or F22

[@BuzzKillingtonS13]

Yeah I could be wrong but it seems like the F35 is designed to be more heavily reliant on the navy to support all of its roles. its ability to interface its own targeting systems with destroyers, and use their larger/faster missiles instead or even fire a missile from ANOTHER f35 isnt mentioned. but thats how they get around the low ordnance yield I guess

[@chanceshields2524]

Phillip Robinson well as its named implies it is a fighter. and it is using the A variant which is the airforce version I think. it is not like they are using the harrier which is a striker first then fighter last. like all American built fighter craft it can do multiple jobs which in this case was air defense.

[@pxatm]

It does that job quite a bit better.

[@phillipr61]

No aircraft in history can do everything well!..its a money saver,good if yourre a government bean counter, not if yourre in the aircraft itself in combat when you come up short! Its all about dollars or saving them,another example the Superhornet! ..can do everything but good at nothing

[@josephahner3031]

it carries the same missiles and a newer radar than either the F15 or F22. Take away the missiles and have a gunfight and you would be correct. Add the ever present E3 sentry support and the difference in performance dwindles.

[@LRRPFco52]

Another problem I see are the pk numbers listed for the AMRAAM. You mentioned the general acronym "BVR" with stats from the Gulf War. Most of the BVR missiles fired in the Gulf War were AIM-7, which we don't use anymore. There is a huge gap in performance between the AIM-7M and AIM-120A, let alone the AIM-120D-4. Also keep in mind that unprecedented levels of development and cyclical testing have been transpiring for many years now with the highly maneuverable QF-16 drones we use, with extreme flight envelope parameters able to be tested on an airframe that has a lower RCS than either the MiG-35 or Su-30 and Su-35, with faster instantaneous turn rate. They have been able to test AIM-120D-4 and AIM-9X against these, then make programmatic changes to the architecture of the AIM-9X and AIM-120D. Most of the testing is done on BVR shots with AIM-120D, including advanced self-protection jamming and countermeasures used by the QF-16 to simulate the latest threat profiles of the MiGs and Sukhois.

[@korencek]

author says everything russian is old technology, even su-35 which have the latest technology integrated.

[@ShortHandedNow]

Wow this video aged like absolute dog shit.

[@SMVB-cl6oc]

but if the mission was in bad weather the f35's would not be allowed off the airfeild lmao

[@demanischaffer]

cheeki breeki *false* the last F35 weather restrictions were lifted in 2015

[@stevecherk1022]

lightning no longer afraid?

[@Lord_Shadowz]

The F35 has a system that cools the entire plane including the skin to lower its infrared picture. I just thought I'd mention that. It's amazing all of the technology they placed into one small aircraft.

[@NebMV]

Absolutely wrong. At 4:30 you show Irbis ability to detect at angles of 120 degrees for both sides. So only 2 scenarious available then. 1) F-35 fired first. Su-35 alter its course to 90-100 degrees to evade missle while keeping F-35 in sight to correct missile course if also fired a rocket. Same tactic in case of next incoming missile and bounding for enemy plane when threat is gone. When F-35 is out of missile kill each of them. 2) Su-35 fired first. Keep safe distance to continue engaging until F-35 fired rocket then do scenario #1. The only reasonable factor is fuel. Will it be enough for F-35 to keep Su-35 from a distance without loosing planes? F-35 don't have nor enough missiles, fuel and speed neither ability to be threat for Su-35 and not to be target at the same time. So this is zero loss for Su-35. By the way 150 km it's more than enough for Su-35 to fire Kh missile for ground target so shore radar will not help anyway.

[@shabdikacharyya2516]

NebMV You are correct my friend

[@arashnozarinejad9915]

Binkov, do USA vs Iran. With Trump's picks it seems more plausible than ever

[@cruelroalex6722]

Arash Nozarinejad here! Trump, White House, red button -BINK!.... nuke - VRrrrrrrroooooooommmmmm!!!! Iran, oh, no! Aaaaaaahhh! Boooommmm! Nuclear winter....

[@lukeswann2859]

Arash Nozarinejad wow we might get to see f-22 vs f-14

[@Gorilder]

not even a contest, it'd take the US about a week to completely neutralize Iran, and that's being very generous.

[@arashnozarinejad9915]

Gorilder absolutely, but, Iran has been preparing itself for such an event for about 30years, and they keep revealing "missile cities" underground. They can cause massive destruction. So all in all it'll be a fun video if Binkov makes it

[@cruelroalex6722]

Arash Nozarinejad i think we can rule out nuclear warfare in this situation... as Binkov sais ''nuclear warfare would ensure mutual destruction''.... so, i don't think any of these countries is ready to make a sacrifice this big...especially Iran, having a significantly smaller surface, a handfull of warheads would completely obliterate the country...

[@doltBmB]

Now that the T-50 PAK-FA has a proper name and has entered production you should do an F-22 vs Su-57 video!

[@walkercobb2808]

I know this video is super old, but I feel like this is a bit of a mismatch. The F-35 is more similar in role to the MiG-35 than the Su-35.

[@tomnimy_5956]

Yeah the su-35 is the Russian air superiority fighter so it would be more comparable to f-22 and the multirole fighter of the Russians is the su-30sm

[@89turbomk3]

Even tho the f22 is primary aircraft for air superiority, the us Air Force didnt built enough. The f35 is going to make for the lack of air superiority role

[@CallsignYukiMizuki]

A-10C vs Su-25 (Whatever is the latest variant) when it comes to CAS

[@lxsc9080]

both are known as flying tanks the SU-25 has a small boost for anti radar and jamming.

[@donsessions6436]

+Lx sc you do realize that the A10 engines are designed that way so if they are hit 1 the explosion dose minimal damage to the rest of the plane and 2 they are spaced apart so it is harder to hit both engines it was designed to fly with only one working

[@CallsignYukiMizuki]

+Lx sc The A-10C can also carry ECM and the way the A-10's engines are position also makes it harder to get hit. If I recall, the A-10's engine also creates less heat sigs

[@lxsc9080]

Same thing with the SU-25 and Russian jamming is better off as of right now sense they are able to jam AESA radar. Their both good I just like the SU-25 specs more. Also the engines on the A-10 have proven difficult in the passed gulf war. You could also argue that the A10 is more battle tested because of the gulf wars compared to the SU-25 which has only seen limited Air ground combat. But in sheer electronics alone the SU-25 is just better the A-10 was never designed with jamming or electronics in mind.

[@donsessions6436]

Yep the A10 is just a flying gun in a titanium shell

[@ondrejbublavy7952]

YOU CAN'T FORGET, IT GREATLY DEPENDS ON PILOTS... :)

[@xuaeenr1]

Good analysis

[@ADMIN-cg2wd]

my left hand vs right hand

[@massineben7198]

ADMIN result: claps :)

[@VOVAN781000]

Su-35 has long been fighting successfully in Syria. In what real battles did the F-35 take part? What are the results?

[@massineben7198]

to this day, they did not get in any real battles. US navy hopes that the F-35C will be the first F-35 to see action

[@demanischaffer]

VOVAN781000 According to the Israeli Airforce the F35i has seen combat in Syria

[@virgilius7036]

Su-35 never fought aircrafts over Syria because islamists dont have one!

[@ufosweekly8702]

Ok and american f-22 has been in more fights than yours. And the f-22 is even are old planes so you just look stupid

[@demanischaffer]

@@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 "could confirm" Like whom? The IAF already has pictures of it's F-35's over Beirut, what reason would the IAF have to lie?

[@modap3000]

F-35 wasn't design with rear aspect stealth in mind. Once they turn, it's over.

[@myusername3689]

The F-35’s maximum sustained turn rate is 18.5 degrees a second which falls behind the F-22’s 19 degrees a second but not by much since they have similar lift to drag ratios because of the similar airframes.

[@sazman68ify]

U under estimated the capability of Russian technology. ..biased reports

[@ok_255]

Lol the creator of this video is himself Russian XD

[@luftwaffe9787]

It isn't biased

[@sharkbite5744]

Su-35 is simply a stunning looking plane, but realistically it would be shot down before it had detected the f-35.

[@sharkbite5744]

Rick Stuifzand why thank you my man!

[@anthonysaponaro6318]

The Russians have always made beautifully capable Air show fighter planes.

[@paulkersey9899]

I think the f35 is a much better looking jet

[@knowsmebyname]

Ha! that is good comment Anthony. SU-35 is gorgeous. Paul that's the first time I have heard that about the F-35. I had thought that the only redeemable physical quality of the F-35 is that it's not the X-32.

[@thecoolnerdplaysvr5674]

Look. I'm a maintainer for the F35. You have no idea how good this jet is. Its good enough to take on a F22 and win. Most of the information is classified. the Su wont even know the 35 was there. but that 35 would have locked on. Theres a lot of cool stuff that can be done. Trust me. Russia has no chance