That what notch said : "You Can play Minecraft on Anything"
@OltScript3133 ай бұрын
So can you play Minecraft in Windows 2.0 or 1.0 ??
@HMX.013 ай бұрын
@@OltScript313 maybe,
@SnowmanSixtyFour3 ай бұрын
Considering Windows 1.0 and 2.0 were also based on dos, everything I said about the Minecraft dos port applies to them as well!
@kralian65233 ай бұрын
minecraft on nokia 6070
@Frilluway3 ай бұрын
He didn't mention java compatibility though
@elechain24413 ай бұрын
Minecraft on DOS is so impressive... Usually you play games like Darklands on DOS but 3D sandbox games sound so crazy on DOS
@epicbrady16623 ай бұрын
If you think DOS is crazy check out GBA craft
@romulo27143 ай бұрын
Classicube is basically a whole clean room re-implementation of Minecraft Classic 0.30, it's client is 100% compatible with the servers of that version (there's a server on it that has been running for more than 10 years iirc) and so you can make an argument that it is quite literally, undisputably, Minecraft.
@classicube3 ай бұрын
It is indisputably similar at least! It does add a ton of backwards-compatibility-friendly features enabled via clever protocol negotiation, so your typical experience will be quite different.
@romulo27143 ай бұрын
@@classicube Oh hey it's you guys, classicube is an amazing project, keep it up!
@damian93033 ай бұрын
It’s the version I most remember playing through IE8 on the school computers back in the day
@AthleticCoast813 ай бұрын
Minecraft on C64
@Erickk_k3 ай бұрын
Minecraft on Atari
@Midway643 ай бұрын
Minecraft on the Amiga
@GeiPeeruPuutin3 ай бұрын
they did classicube on playstation 1 though
@waterhulk093 ай бұрын
Why did I read that as Minecraft on c418
@roflaflop3 ай бұрын
Minecraft on single transistor
@osdwa3 ай бұрын
5:20 Windows NT 3.51 is no way a version of Win3.1. It is completely different OS with completely different architecture etc. It has nothing in common with Win3.1 other than how it looks and feels.
@SnowmanSixtyFour3 ай бұрын
Just thought I'd throw it in the video because it does have a similar name and feel, despite how different they truly are! It's the closest we can get to running Minecraft on "3.1" even if it's only possible to run ClassiCube on NT But thank you for clarifying! I did believe at first that NT 3.51 was connected to the original 3.1
@rickasheyelabs56622 ай бұрын
you can pretty much do everything on WinNT 3.51 as you can on Win3.1. its just the backends are different, as you mentioned but you can run dos apps on WinNT 3.51
@NoscoperSans2 ай бұрын
I found your channel because of "FNAF beta" video, and for some reason, i like your content very much, your voice, montage, it's just so enjoyable. thank you for your content and effort. thank you for making my workday a little bit better:)
@OnlyOneCatPlushie3 ай бұрын
How's the nostalgic experience hitting? ✏️ Am I annoying you guys from the win2k video? I'm sorry 😔🥺
@P.CL33T3 ай бұрын
Man, I would love to see this continued to become something else entirely, well I mean, minecraft wise
@truestbluu3 ай бұрын
what i would do to show this to a person back when windows 3.1 was around
@yglyglya3 ай бұрын
he would think youre an alien
@SoulcatcherLucario3 ай бұрын
nice video, but it's bad practice to stretch 4:3 to 16:9. it's not just ugly, it looks unnatural and not how it is supposed to be. black bars are preferable to a stretched image
@FroztYcle47372 ай бұрын
Yes, but that's your opinion.
@imrocklauncher2 ай бұрын
@@FroztYcle4737your saying you think 4:3 being stretched across the screen to fit 16:9 actually looks good to you?
@maxmuster70032 ай бұрын
Wide screen 16:9 and 16: 10 aspect ratio for DOS exist on newer graphic cards Geforce and Radeon with VBE 3 bios with 1920x1080x32 and 1920x1200x32 resolution for example.
@LoremIpsum19194 күн бұрын
@@FroztYcle4737 No it's just better to not stretch 4:3 into a 16:9 image (unless the 4:3 image is made to be stretched).
@windestruct3 ай бұрын
Can't you run the dos minecraft in a windowed mode on Windows 3.1?
@deez23813 ай бұрын
We got Minecraft running in MS-DOS before GTA6
@Gamingmouse642 ай бұрын
Snowman64's next video: Can I play Minecraft on a Turing Machine?!??!?!
@matty65983 ай бұрын
Next we need an amiga port
@GeiPeeruPuutin3 ай бұрын
also that aint guest additions. guest additions never supports 3d accelration at all below win2000 (expect for softgpu driver which is for win9x) i did it using some mesa dll that works on nt 3.51
@GeiPeeruPuutin3 ай бұрын
but u still earned a sub congrats
@TheBoringFamily2 ай бұрын
Woah! Minecraft in 1992!
@GeiPeeruPuutin3 ай бұрын
wtf i got mentioned?? also ur video popped up on my main account lmao
@magicdippyegg3 ай бұрын
The reason the camera is like that is because it’s a virtual machine
@testCORUPTEDARCHIVES3 ай бұрын
Why the message "Now in MS-DOS" don't apair?
@SnowmanSixtyFour3 ай бұрын
Because I opened Windows 3.1 in VirtualBox, and MS-DOS in DOSBox. Since I'm not used to messing with dos that much, it was easier for me to use them separately. And yes, I'm aware it isn't hard to learn how to do them both in the same program! I'll figure it out some day ;)
@elechain24413 ай бұрын
So true my king snowman 🙏💯
@kylekartgaming2 ай бұрын
I can't get ClassiCube to run. I get an error with the open32.dll. Both that and glu32.dll are present.
@THWrblx2 ай бұрын
When you at work, you secretly install classicube in NT 3.51 💀
@paranoia20213 ай бұрын
What’s next, running DOOM?
@yusufsrdr3 ай бұрын
Anything can run DOOM.
@giuliomariniello20063 ай бұрын
You can just get the original 1993 version for DOS and run it from there, Windows 3.x is more DOS-based than the later versions that have a kernel that runs with DOS, but Windows 1.xx and 2.xx use almost all DOS. Optionally, you can also put Ultimate Doom's DOOM.WAD and run more Doom!
@theairaccumulator71442 ай бұрын
Running Minecraft is so much harder than running Doom. Doom is C with no libraries vs Minecraft which is Java with tons of libraries
@Archman155Ай бұрын
@@theairaccumulator7144 i think.. it might be a joke. maybe.. especially considering doom is made for DOS.. hmmmm
@Elitenothere2 ай бұрын
I know this is might just be for windows but I’m trying to install exe games on my phone, but it won’t work for me. Do you or anyone else know of a way to install this Minecraft or any other games on dosbox for RetroArch?
@Gabriel130462 ай бұрын
guys we discovered minecraft -1.0.0
@Marshin209.3 ай бұрын
what about unix
@vetrixfx92643 ай бұрын
which UNIX tho
@nathussilverus3 ай бұрын
A bit off-topic, I noticed you put a specific renditions of Minecraft's music, which is from the PSX modpack. Now I wonder, have you ever planned to make a video about said modpack?
@SnowmanSixtyFour3 ай бұрын
Already got a series on the modpack, made 3 episodes so far! It's quite interesting
@Emixelix1422 ай бұрын
cero que es una version modificada de windows 3.1 para que pueda funcionar el minecraft
@MA78yt3 ай бұрын
Sigma youtube video. :) :) >:)
@ChaseMC2153 ай бұрын
Technically it can run on Windows 98, as long as it's an older version. And even then it's not visable. Druaga1 made a video yeara ago about that
@RafiRo13 ай бұрын
Next: Can you play Minecraft on Windows 1.01?
@reneablackheart95632 ай бұрын
imagine having multiplayer servers work on this using TELNET or something
@shovel_salesman3 ай бұрын
next: can you play Minecraft 1.21 without a kernel?
@jktech21173 ай бұрын
next: can you play minecraft on an abacus?
@Olflix3 ай бұрын
@@jktech2117 Actually, you theoretically could use a series of like 40 thousand abacus as a monitor screen using a robot built using something like Arduino to change it according to the pixels on the actual monitor (the non-abacus one). It would be one hell of a slow screen though.
@DaVince212 ай бұрын
Ogod the background music.
@epicbrady16623 ай бұрын
Minecraft on Gameboy Advance exists
@supervitu642 ай бұрын
is minecraft gonna become the next doom
@ThatLinuxDude3 ай бұрын
ok but, NT 3.1.
@AwokadoYT3 ай бұрын
ms dos next
@piratefox493 ай бұрын
Minecraft on dos runs better than the ps4 version.
@haxidenti60013 ай бұрын
I would call it doscraft, but not an Minecraft. It's not minecraft, so technically you didn't run mc on 3.1
@Xhepyxopila3 ай бұрын
it's Minecraft ported to DOS
@mrbeppis69643 ай бұрын
i am placing blocks and shit cause im in fkn minecraft
@scrambled_egg33 ай бұрын
if it can run java 8, it can run minecraft.
@gabrielesmenda762 ай бұрын
Windows 31 playing super Mario Bros, please😊😊😊
@perpoll62813 ай бұрын
Now play minecraft on templeOS
@HelloVista-Droid3 ай бұрын
I runned Minecraft 1.8.8 , the real minecraft and not a Copy , I also played multiplayer
@UnrealOG1373 ай бұрын
Minecraft on a wristwatch
@sdjhgfkshfswdfhskljh33602 ай бұрын
Since Java is open source, it is possible to port it to Windows 3.11. But you took lazy way.
@Cat_loaf203 ай бұрын
Do it on a intel 4004
@HameleoshaDeHoga3 ай бұрын
Cool
@UltimatePerfection2 ай бұрын
Minecraft runs on Java. There's a Java VM that can run in Win3.1.
@system1117alt2 ай бұрын
You could probably beat me in pvp ez even with windows 3.1
@ScarletteGrace-g5h2 ай бұрын
Ur playing Minecraft on windows 3.1?
@Martel_Yggdrasil2 ай бұрын
you can't 😁 Windows NT 3.51 look more like Windows XP than Windows 3.1 (16 bit gui for msdos).
@hcbs19862 ай бұрын
God damn
@iraitsjffskts3 ай бұрын
before i even clicked the video i said “no” because java doesn’t even have 3.x support
@Gbs1283 ай бұрын
Woah
@humanharddrive13 ай бұрын
BRING NORMAL GRAPHICS TO JAVA EDITION 🗣🗣🗣🔥🔥🔥
@yagoonek3 ай бұрын
yay
@floweryforest3 ай бұрын
Ok now do an amiga 1500 /j
@Moresteck2 ай бұрын
i'm gonna make the real deal run on real win98 without kernelex
@dom_fan64813 ай бұрын
Can you play minecraft on a baked potato
@Zeb1947Ай бұрын
it's inverted
@-shiroi2 ай бұрын
Make Minecraft doom 2.0
@Animation_Studios_Krikap02 ай бұрын
clickbait then
@HarleyMarshall-w3k3 ай бұрын
Minecraft N64
@GeiPeeruPuutin3 ай бұрын
classicube site has port for nintendo 64 but it didnt work for me in emulator sadly ps1 did though