We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder
@cookiemonstahmetal5 жыл бұрын
You really need to change the term cheap to something like, “more affordable” or “not that expensive”, it’s ridiculous to call an Omega “cheap”.
@iaido015 жыл бұрын
in his video he said affordable. he wrote cheap as a clickbait titel
@josephburton32324 жыл бұрын
@@iaido01 I wish I lived in a world where $6,000 was cheap or more affordable haha.
@iaido014 жыл бұрын
@@josephburton3232 haha it is affordable luxury. i mean i make good money, but it is still a lot of money for a watch and it always will be.
@robertotorresbenites1278 Жыл бұрын
Maybe you need to change your job
@WorldsWorstFishing5 жыл бұрын
"Cheap" Speedmaster haha..
@tolga1cool5 жыл бұрын
Well. It certainly is one of the cheapest watches on the channel so...
@wakajumba5 жыл бұрын
My sentiments exactly!
@augustinf5 жыл бұрын
We are talking about a watch as expensive as a second hand car and that costs probably the same to service. It’s pretty offensive to call a high luxury masterpiece with tons of history a cheap watch. It’s as high as most wealthy people would go for a watch. 10k+ is for people with really, really a lot of spare money or just for idiots who buy things they can’t afford
@alexshe95525 жыл бұрын
+1
@svenschukat29585 жыл бұрын
triggered me
@jasue20005 жыл бұрын
The 1/4 mm thinner did it for me. I’m ordering 2 right now!!
@Armoer5 жыл бұрын
TDY Ranger on it’s own, it seems like nothing, but combined with the 15 hours of extra power reserve it actually is quite an accomplishment
@mariocobos20015 жыл бұрын
Pure class! Chow!
@JackP335 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting for a full mm and the resulting additional 60 hour power reserve.
@jphili5 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting for something that's multiple orders of magnitude more accurate, never has to be wound, and is virtually indestructible. Oh, wait, I already have one. It's a $10 Casio in injection-molded plastic with rubber strap.
@RX-8GT5 жыл бұрын
@@jphili 😂
@kennethwong60855 жыл бұрын
Can we take a moment to admire the amount of effort Watchfinder puts into the production of his videos? All the close-up views of the watches are simply beautiful. This is the best watch channel I have ever come across. Glad this was in my recommended.
@uptheorg5 жыл бұрын
I agree about the production values and the script they use. My one gripe is the "clickbait" nature of the video titles -- this one is a perfect example -- where is the "cheap" chronograph?
@SuburbanPathfinder5 жыл бұрын
Who else spent the first three minutes wondering what the "cheap" chronograph was going to turn out to be?
@semoge32495 жыл бұрын
Guilty!
@belc57785 жыл бұрын
well 5k relative to 40k is cheap and this channel does focus on higher end pieces in general so... :/
@FlorianLify5 жыл бұрын
LOL same here....although I saw it coming! 😁
@rbtdoster5 жыл бұрын
LOL, I was thinking "they'll be bringing in a Movement watch any second now"...nope
@thenexthobby5 жыл бұрын
Same here, and then I realized what channel I was on.
@jupiterseir88045 жыл бұрын
For some strange reason I thought there was going to be a cheap watch in there somewhere.
@bcwlstd67185 жыл бұрын
Jake Roth alright baller, calm down
@TheEchelon5 жыл бұрын
Jake Roth You're an exellent example of how money can't buy class.
@neilpiper98895 жыл бұрын
What like a Sea-gull 1963
@herbhandyman89335 жыл бұрын
Pareto's law or more familiarly, the "80/20" rule applies everywhere. Omega is a fine example of watchmaking, the Breguet more so and PP the ultimate. Each representing an exponential increase in work and value. I would place them at 80, 95 and 100 percent respectively. That last 5 percent costs more than 10 times the first 80 and 4 times the first 95. Their value lies in one's ability to appreciate the level of refinement and workmanship. Your videos and explanations help to educate me, and I'm sure others, to develop that appreciation. Unfortunately, my bank account hasn't appreciated in kind!
@deus_ex_machina_5 жыл бұрын
Wonderfully put.
@pasquale785 жыл бұрын
Well cheap is relative term. Here the Speedmaster retails at 5k minimum, I wouldn’t call that cheap.
@omarandre6835 жыл бұрын
Pasquale im pretty sure the term cheap is used based on the relatice prices of luxury watches. Surely 5k isnt cheap but for a luxury watch? thats pretty cheap considering most would cost upwards that price
@pasquale785 жыл бұрын
Omar Andre I know it’s relatively cheap. No disrespect mate 👍🏻
@ashleycrane4155 жыл бұрын
Pasquale you’re as wrong as you are right. £5000 is, in isolation, a lot of money. But if you factor in the design, execution, testing, quality control, the years of training each member of staff goes through and the technical ability required to assemble such an intricate mechanism it’s not very much at all. It’s not what a watch is or what a watch does that sets mechanical watches apart, but what it says about those who put it together.
@Dylan-xj8tb5 жыл бұрын
And others would...that's why it's relative, especially in the realm of luxury watches. See how that works?
@mowtime5 жыл бұрын
If you don’t consider $5000 cheap for a watch, than your not earning enough
@jab925 жыл бұрын
Of all the inconveniences in life, having to hand wind a Speedmaster every other day is at the top of the list of "best things that one could be inconvenienced by..."
@mahamza865 жыл бұрын
Watching your videos is a sort of therapy for me. Like the Patek, these videos are polished and well finished.
@ailatejrithvik15645 жыл бұрын
Hamza Khawaja .hgbk
@jeanraspail29795 жыл бұрын
Exactly, watching these watch videos is so calming. Only watching Bob Ross paint is more relaxing.
@HucaPuca5 жыл бұрын
"Cheap" makes most people think up to $500, not $5000. I know watchmaking is by definition expensive, but calling an Omega cheap makes me rethink going into watches....
@mrbacchus61275 жыл бұрын
I completely agree
@MrGeoffrey19985 жыл бұрын
For a mechanical movement it's not that expensive. It would be like saying " cheap car that has a V12". It's cheap considering the internals it has, i don't say i'll buy one, even if i make a good use of my money, but i just say it's the value of big brands and high quality watches.
@dannydyerschocolatehomuncu76405 жыл бұрын
You can get a v good condition seamaster moon watch for £2500. That’s not bad really for what it is
@skylersponberg22605 жыл бұрын
Don’t be a pussy
@pymandragore5 жыл бұрын
@@The_Greg_5000 the seagull 1963 with venus 175 movement is worth between 200 and 300 depending on the version. I have the 42mm with opened caseback, the movement is really gorgeous for the price.
@pwsod5 жыл бұрын
Cheap? The cost of the Omega would be more than many could aspire to for one watch. Maybe for a collection? Yes! The rest are for those who do not live in this world.
@KaneChamp5 жыл бұрын
For some reason the movement parts of the Speedmaster do look cleaner and less damaged than those of the Breguet movement.
@belluco5 жыл бұрын
I really really thought the Speedmaster was the expensive one!
@archer1x2575 жыл бұрын
I own exactly the Speedy Moonwatch with Caliber 1863. Everytime I look at the watch from both sides, it reminds me how wonderful this piece of art really is. Even If you consider the history and legend behind the Speedy, it definitely has much value for the amount of money.
@Svartsomkato5 жыл бұрын
I totally agree, and the value is insane for such a cheap watch.
@zhbroder5 жыл бұрын
no other horological channels even comes close to production quality.
@CYC_JP5 жыл бұрын
zac talks a lot Of course... because watchfinder channel is funded by Richemont group.
@DuxEtRex5 жыл бұрын
Or snobbery
@MrAnonymousRandom5 жыл бұрын
That's because these watch finder and co sells high end used watches and they. Know their product.
@77747102355 жыл бұрын
The speedy is cheap and here I am with my skx tho Lol
@FlorianLify5 жыл бұрын
I own a Speedy and also an SKX; it's an awesome watch mate! (Furthermore one can't swim with a Speedy! ☺)
@ajpappas76525 жыл бұрын
My SKX steals wrist time from my Seamaster.
@StreetArtistsOfTheWorld4 жыл бұрын
10:28 Still waiting for that cheap watch to show up, any second now!
@amankumar29475 жыл бұрын
*I loved that you showed instantaneous minute change in chronograph for the Patek which wasn't there for Omega & Breguet*😊👏
@koengoedhart98495 жыл бұрын
A hand wound chronograph equals high end watch making, well done seagull
@qlan-93865 жыл бұрын
Seagulls are a pretty good deal though, all things considered
@MpSSpeaker5 жыл бұрын
Seagull bought old Swiss machinery and produces a Venus 175 calibre, originally used in some Breitlings and others before.
@domokun9385 жыл бұрын
I have a seagull chronograph and a speedmaster. Love them both!
@justinbowe385 жыл бұрын
@@domokun938 I just bought the panda dial seagull 1963. Cant wait for it to arrive!
@meltdowngrfx9695 жыл бұрын
Timothy Ng me too!
@AP-pg5dx5 жыл бұрын
I am guessing the only reason why they didn’t feature Lange in this video is because it never used a Lemania manual chrono?🤔 In my view, when it comes to finishing nobody does it better than Lange!
@sebs67365 жыл бұрын
No one.
@dingmingzou98665 жыл бұрын
true. when it comes to finishing Lange is unchallengeable...
@base9245 жыл бұрын
Yes, Lange has only used their own inhouse chronograph. Patek, VC was then "forced" to produce their own to catch up, but the germans has since made the double--and triplesplit chronograph leaving everybody else in the dust.
@burritomaker695 жыл бұрын
A P then you don’t know much about finishing or watches then....
@AP-pg5dx5 жыл бұрын
Max Power did you even read what I wrote you moron? If you don’t agree, then tell us who does movement finishing better than Lange.
@MrJezza315 жыл бұрын
That Breguet is absolutely stunning.
@tryura5 жыл бұрын
This sapphire back view is just stunning. It wouldn't be that impressive with a rotor in a view.
@sbeckett915 жыл бұрын
I feel like such a peasant watching this while wearing a Speedmaster.
@fahimmosharrof72095 жыл бұрын
4:01 "It's not the front we are interested in, it's the back" this is the quote for 2019.Cheers
@panayiotiskyriacou51185 жыл бұрын
There is another one there. Price wise between the speedy and the Breguet and probably the best one for the money. the Zenith El Primero
@dimitriskekos5 жыл бұрын
Σωστός
@achiltsompanos4475 жыл бұрын
Is it manual?
@jonathanross66205 жыл бұрын
It isnt manual is it?
@markymark35725 жыл бұрын
But that's an automatic flyback chronograph, albeit an excellent watch, this video is about manual wind chronographs
@praetor475 жыл бұрын
@Panayiotis: if you didn't notice, the whole point of the video was comparing the "same" movement done at different price points. the El Primero doesn't fit (plus it's traditionally automatic). @others: there are manual versions of the El Primero (though they're nowhere near as pretty as even the 1863 here, imo. the auto is one of the prettier auto chrono movements around, but the manual is just okay)
@mkoldewijn5 жыл бұрын
The videography on these videos is simply amazing! I have loved this channel since I saw the first video!
@thatsbod10415 жыл бұрын
A return to form vid wise. There will be loads of comments saying the Speedy isn't cheap. It isn't as a mechanical watch but it is for what you get especially when considering movement sharing & finishing. It's an explanation as to price differentiation (market positioning aside) & as ever beautifully illustrated 👍🏻
@jztouch5 жыл бұрын
It’s good to know that in our throwaway culture there are still craftsman that take such obsessive pride in their work. Where else do we get to see this level of craftsmanship in the world today? I may not be able to afford one but through these wonderful Watchfinder & Co videos I can certainly appreciate them.
@Aggnog5 жыл бұрын
The 5170 is by far my favorite patek. It looks so understated, yet refined and it has the most beautiful hands on any watch in my opinion.
@hairynutsack97045 жыл бұрын
KZbin Notification: WatchFinder & Co. uploaded a new video. Me: Start my watch's Chronograph until i watch it.
@LesterLovesWatches5 жыл бұрын
“Before you reach for your pitchforks” 😂. I love this phrase.
@tods.99475 жыл бұрын
With the Swiss it’s all relative. I recently had a much cheaper manual wind Chrono. A Sturmanskie. There is also the Venus chronos.
@lucderan5 жыл бұрын
This channel, the videos, the scripts and the general style could make fall in love of horology everybody! I learn something in every single video! Thank you so much!
@ekimandersom44782 жыл бұрын
So where is the cheap option?
@FV40305 жыл бұрын
Can YOU tell the difference between the words “cheap” and “more affordable”?
@freedomchannel36565 жыл бұрын
Any word on when Omega is to complete it's 321 movement remake and Market it?
@user-dr7tb4xf4o5 жыл бұрын
stephen kennedy Maybe for the 50th anniversary of the moon landing? Should be pretty soon if so.
@koenreith5 жыл бұрын
I am so done with everyone saying the omega isn't cheap. Of course there is no timex quartz chrono featured. Who would want to watch close ups of that?
@redcomet63275 жыл бұрын
Koen Reith why not?
@koenreith5 жыл бұрын
Well I don't know about you but I'm here to see the beauty of extremely well designed, built and finished watches as well as learning about their heritage. A timex is about cutting as many corners as possible it just won't stand up to the scrutany of a macro lens.
@DuxEtRex5 жыл бұрын
@@koenreith shut the fuck up
@cookingprof5 жыл бұрын
The Omega & Patek do have the same basic design. The Omega has 19 Jewels v/ the Patek 33 Jewels. The hand finishing of every part in a Patek has edgebreaks that are from: 0.0005 to 0.001 inches. FULL DISCLOSURE: I own 2 Patek dress watches. I would still consider adding this Omega to my collection.
@robertsullivan47735 жыл бұрын
Exercise in insanity, love it. Great video as usual once again I learned more than I knew before I watched it.
@runs_wth_scizors37895 жыл бұрын
Your presentation is as polished as the Patek Philippe. Thank you for all of the effort you go to in preparation. It is appreciate greatly.
@Kevcpb245 жыл бұрын
07:14 of the video it looks like the E in "PATEK" is missing part of the ink at the very top of the E
@sandman66175 жыл бұрын
Yes, very nice watches, different price points. I’m fortunate to own the Speedmaster. With the naked eye, I still find myself looking at the face and appreciating how meticulously done the design is. While watching videos showing the same at macro view I appreciate it even more. The moon watch is the most well done dial for a chronograph no matter how deep your pockets are. Historical too.
@urbanoteal63343 жыл бұрын
Same here. Sometimes when I check the time I find myself admiring my timepiece.
@richardsherwin32595 жыл бұрын
Excellent video as usual 👌 I now want a manual wind speedmaster 😋
@CrimFerret5 жыл бұрын
I had sort of hoped we'd see one from A. Lange & Sohne considering they pretty much forced Patek Phillipe to go to the drawing board when the Datograph came out and I'm not sure they've managed to match much less exceed the finish level ALS puts on their movements.
@mb-watches5 жыл бұрын
Having my Saphire speedy since 2012 and enjoying the hell out of it. Not have a feeling missing anything, it’s just the perfect Chrono 😊 Great video as usual and loving your macros. Keep up the good work 👍🏻🙏🏻
@thepantcoat7564 Жыл бұрын
Does it have a column wheel tho
@BedouinSpirit5 жыл бұрын
Again you nailed it! A great watches demonstration with an amazing voice narration... We need more videos 🥰
@nilsgunnebro36755 жыл бұрын
I would like to have a review of the Junghans Meister Chronoscope
@oscarslife54975 жыл бұрын
Think they featured that one already
@theodorelenoir5 жыл бұрын
Hey Nils, you can have a look at their video called "3 Watch Collection For Less Than A Rolex Submariner", it's featured there.
@tehgamist71395 жыл бұрын
8:30 blemish on the second I at the top!? ... £40k? I want perfection.
@jphili5 жыл бұрын
Better off getting a $10 quartz cheapo. Far and away more accurate.
@cbcdesign0015 жыл бұрын
@@jphili Its not about pure accuracy necessarily, a modern smart phone tells the time more precisely than many high end watches, its about craftsmanship.
@DS422965 жыл бұрын
Around 5:33 why did the wheels stop turning? D:
@hugogonzalez80955 жыл бұрын
My God I’ve had the Daytona in both stainless and now have one in ceramic but I must admit that the Speedmaster is unmistakably beautiful and I love every bit of it. It will be my next acquisition I promise you that and others like the El Primero, although appealing, doesn’t come close.
@rgassaf15 жыл бұрын
Hugo Gonzalez The ElPrinero is a killer! It was actually, not long ago, equipping the Daytonas
@hugogonzalez80955 жыл бұрын
RGA1 I know my non ceramic Daytona was a before 2000 model that had a Zenith “Rolex tweaked” movement..I’ve never been particularly fond of a date window on a chronograph, that Rolex removed from the Zenith movement, I believe they should not have one it makes the watch much too messy.
@stevenrobertson76434 жыл бұрын
Yet the Patek Philippe still has the Speedmaster's problem of the minute recorder jumping too soon, so a time of 59.8 seconds reads 1 minute 59.8 seconds and so on. Watch from 9:21.
@tynchytemper96184 жыл бұрын
Need to review the St19 if we're talking cheap manual chronograph movements?
@BarnOwl615 жыл бұрын
The ultimate difference occurs when you bring your watch in for a service!
@77cjam5 жыл бұрын
To all the people moaning in the comments that you don't consider a £3000 watch to be cheap or affordable I may personally agree, but the term like many others is relative. I also suggest if you can't just appreciate the craftsmanship and information given for what it is as presented by this channel without getting offended by a £3000 being labelled affordable, you aren't going to enjoy any of this channel videos. So save your time, there are plenty other channels out there for you. If you can appreciate the beautifully crafted watches and informative dialogue, despite perhaps not agreeing with what is and what isn't affordable, then enjoy
@Mondi19115 жыл бұрын
I dont think people have a problem with calling a £3000 watch affordable. Calling it cheap on the other hand is a totally different matter.
@coloneltheo5 жыл бұрын
i love how they said that Patek went to painstaking lengths to ensure a snap occurs instead of a drawn out movement, yet if you watch the minute hand tick over it actually changes 0.2 of a second early. not sure that 0.5-0.9 of a second improvement justifies the 20x multiple...
@seunbejide44755 жыл бұрын
That Breguet looks amazing.
@badboy4lyfe884 жыл бұрын
Should a watch like this be stored on a watch winder box, or is it ok for it to stop and restart when you use it again?
@edgeyt14 жыл бұрын
For those looking to spend less than the cost of a Speedy take a look at the Longines big eye.
@Dan-lr9uc5 жыл бұрын
You should have chosen the JLC Master Chronograph for the middle priced watch.
@dropfactoryrecords11145 жыл бұрын
Dan Manoliu no
@Tom-yp8hj5 жыл бұрын
Your tutorials are perfect, full of strong insights overlaid with specifications that boggle the mind. I enjoy all of them Thank you
@rayleeaustralia5 жыл бұрын
If you leave the second hand ticking on a chronograph, will it unwound itself faster than if the second hand is not moving?
@kacperuminski15475 жыл бұрын
A speedmaster is neither affordable nor at an entry level. A Seagull 1963 is both.
@treedillinger58015 жыл бұрын
It’s entry level for luxury watches. There are other channels for cheap Chinese watches. 🤷🏻♂️
@kacperuminski15475 жыл бұрын
@@treedillinger5801 I would actually classify the Seagull as a luxury watch because it costs way more than the average (not an enthusiast) person would be willing to spend on a watch. At least if we define "luxury watch" like that.
@victorcastropalavicino44345 жыл бұрын
@@treedillinger5801 entry level cheap
@b.peppercorn7395 жыл бұрын
It entirely depends on how much money you have, if you don't have any money than you call it unaffordable .
@treedillinger58015 жыл бұрын
Victor Castro Palavicino I didn’t say it was cheap. The words cheap and luxury are inherently incompatible. 🤷🏻♂️ I know it’s used in the title of the video, which is misleading, but it’s used in the context of a luxury watch channel.
@MobiusCoin5 жыл бұрын
And here I am fiddling around with my Seagull 1963 thinking I paid a pretty penny for that 🤣
@pipetrucciable5 жыл бұрын
Those macro shots are stunning.
@suncity220015 жыл бұрын
Forgivable, but first error in watchfinder review history calling a Speedmaster ‘cheap’, by calling the Omega cheap, the Breguet becomes average and the Royal Oak ‘good’, the ‘Daytona’ good. Should one have to spend 40k to get an excellent watch ? I think watchfinder could have thought through the use of his words for the title of this video.
@deus_ex_machina_5 жыл бұрын
The Omega is the least expensive manual Swiss chronograph.
@MattH-wg7ou4 жыл бұрын
I can tell that at 0:13 thats an Omega (more accurately NOT a Patek) and at 0:15 thats a Patek (or ALS, VC, etc)
@majorintherepublick58625 жыл бұрын
Fabulous video as usual!! Just wished you’d included the Breitling in your lineup, they are an amazing example of watchmaking in the chrono world, just my opinion
@gubpkt90165 жыл бұрын
What is the cheapest open-back or open-front swiss watch? Any opinion?
@greenhat76185 жыл бұрын
Can anyone please tell me what is that thing on the right hand side of the screen between “Patek” and “Philippe” at 7:51?
@antoniochang45535 жыл бұрын
Well researched and perfectly presented. I would have liked to see the Parmigiani Kalpagraph featured as this brand uses internal calibres made by Vaucher, a manufacture they partially own
@frnciscob15 жыл бұрын
So a dressed up cal 321 is worth over $40k? I think even if I had the money knowing this I would still keep the speedmaster, I would do a lateral upgrade to a snoopy or a moonphase.
@ThePmfan3 жыл бұрын
I love my Seiko 6139-7002 (original owner from when I was a teenager) and 6032. Not manually wound, but very sporty.
@zulfikranzulmos40664 жыл бұрын
His voice is very soothing
@felipeleguer875 жыл бұрын
"Cheap"
@treedillinger58015 жыл бұрын
-er
@zzygyy5 жыл бұрын
Inexpensive
@ctawab4 жыл бұрын
Zzygyy $7000 is inexpensive
@kmcmichael4 жыл бұрын
For someone who watched the moon landing as a 10 year old boy on a black and white TV in East Texas, the Speedmaster has no peer, no matter the price.
@nick86035 жыл бұрын
Maybe not the best title, but the shot with the moving focus on the Patek movement is outstanding!
@GarySlegg4 жыл бұрын
So why is it on watches the Roman 4 is always IIII rather than IV?
@TheDeviltech5 жыл бұрын
Could you compare the nomos lambda with the "entry level" a lange like you did with montblan and patek
@jensc.h.5485 жыл бұрын
is this a re-upload? I'm pretty sure I have watched a video with the same title here
@Aramis75 жыл бұрын
Your vids are of a quality that is an order of magnitude above the rest. Please keep them coming.
@tibitotetti74805 жыл бұрын
Hi,can u review a Oris calibre 111 or 113 any of these 2. Thanks
@WatchGeek5 жыл бұрын
Great video, but I can't justify the line "it takes a lot of money to develop an in house version". I mean come on, Rolex, Patek, AP are NOT poor or fighting to stay in business and yet the have been using non in-house movements for decades and until recently! I was once called out for "nitpicking" when I commented on AP RO Offshore not having an in-house movement... I'm sorry but at THAT price point, I have every right to nitpick as much as I like!
@zieglerziga5 жыл бұрын
Dear watchfinder, What is the background song name? It is so fitting to the theme of your videos.
@hailstorm7115 жыл бұрын
Amazing video as always. Could you please share the background music title.
@stevek88295 жыл бұрын
Labeling the jewel count in the movement is gauche. Knob polishing notwithstanding. The Omega is pure quality, not bling.
@AlexEarMusic5 жыл бұрын
I mean the Speedmaster is a watch you take for the nostalgia factor that goes along with it. No other watch really feels brand new but keeps its soul alive. The fact that all of the watches are literally based on the same movement really does not make the Speedmaster look bad, but it is the father that the sons and daughters learned their lessons from.
@menaseven90935 жыл бұрын
I like the Omega Speedmaster with the display case back
@zarilzulkarnain95293 жыл бұрын
I got a question is it all auto and mechanical need a wound. Sorry I only wear quartz but I want to have one
@Voltron3000R5 жыл бұрын
Can you please compare Omega Deville Tresor hand wound and the similar VC three handed Patrimony Self winding.
@Samir_15 жыл бұрын
Fantastic content & Great work indeed!
@pedrobrazon66105 жыл бұрын
Makes me want to get an omega speedmaster more than the breguet or the PP
@Paddington20005 жыл бұрын
Thinking about it, there wouldn't have been much point in having an automatic moon watch even if it had been completed on time, a floating rotor would have struggled a bit.
@b.peppercorn7395 жыл бұрын
Brilliant presentation as always......
@Pulsonar3 жыл бұрын
The production of this video is exquisite, beautifully presented as always. The macro shots are amazing, what lens - Hasselblad, Leica, ...? The house of optics are as big a star as the house of horology here.
@siddharthanarayan2739 Жыл бұрын
How much would a Carl F Bucherer Manero central chrono (not the flyback) cost today? This watch is no longer in production and was discontinued in 2019 A new watch was for US $4800 back in 2019 So,what would be its cost today in the second hand market ?
@davidshkhyan30215 жыл бұрын
Please give me some info about the 1960-70is Swiss Sabina 17 jewels reminderdate alarm thanks in advance
@JaredSteadman5 жыл бұрын
I’m saving for a Zenith El Primero Annual Calendar Captain Windsor, with the fume dial. I think the applied Arabic numerals, and integrated chronograph would look stunning on one of your close up videos. I’d also love the see the Datograph, and your Saxonia from ALS (when it arrives). A one watch man... I envy your restraint. But what a watch!!!
@dvobry68005 жыл бұрын
The pictures are amazing, thanks for this awesome video !!