Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Review - Budget Excellence

[@dronespace]

I love using this lens to take portrait photos of pigeons

[@andrediego6131]

we can tell

[@josesanabria3819]

There aren't many reviewers on the Internet who I really trust, but you are one that I do, and you have definitely convinced me to buy this lens. Thank you for your great reviews! Some more greetings from the heart of South America, Paraguay!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy your new lens, Jose. It's a strong value.

[@MarkoNara]

Best Telephoto for Canon APS-C under 500USD. Its a no brainer. Nice review Dustin! Greetings from Paraguay.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Marko Nara I think you're right. I would have said the Tamron 70-300 VC before (and still if you need a cheap FF compatible telephoto), but this lens is better for a APS-C body.

[@roadnepal9473]

Marko Nara #which 1 is good for beginners canon 55-250 or tamron 18-200 VC

[@JithinPv]

Khem Raj Bhandari 55-250, tamaron 18-200's image quality is not satisfactory

[@sugashack74]

@@roadnepal9473 i BOUGHT A 18-200 and returned it right away. IQ is horrible even for a walk around.

[@scot0811]

They cost much less than 500usd nowadays , about 60usd is more like it

[@MohamedElsayedAbdelaziz]

Could you please make review Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM vs Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM?

[@bhd812]

Amazing lens that can be had as an add on for lots of kits. Amazing price with a kit at $150. One thing for people looking to use this for a first time DSLR and bird photography is you need the lens hood, lots of white washing with birds as sometimes more than not the bird and the sun is not in a perfect balance. I have a cheapo hood from Amazon and it works great. at 400mm EQFL it will work great for Passerine birds as you can usually get pretty close to them. It also tracks smaller birds nicely, much better than i seen off the old 75-300 kit add on. One of my favorite lenses to use with Extension tubes, just a all around fun and damn amazing for a $150 kit add on. Thanks Dustin for another great review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks for the nice feedback, and for highlighting again the necessity of using the lens hood with it. Some lenses you can get away with, but not this one

[@tnpacr]

New to DSLR cameras. Thank you for explaining the manual focus ring mechanism, thought mine was broken.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's unique to STM-type lenses.

[@theseventhstring4506]

yes same here. thanks for the info.

[@aredamzd1]

Man, what a THOROUGH review. Very detailed yet not "talking down" to the viewer. Excellent communication skills (eye contact, hand gestures, diction. NO annoying music/sounds). Thank you so much for sharing. Have you reviewed the Canon T7i camera? PS, had to "like" and subscribe. Keep these coming.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad you enjoyed it! And no, I didn't review the T7i. I haven't covered many of the T series cameras.

[@aredamzd1]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you for your prompt response

[@Alvin-eq5rc]

Know I understand why my focus ring isn’t working.. I have to press the button. Great video sir.. just purchased my first DSLR

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Exactly.

[@maxfactor4209]

Great as it was expected from you... I really enjoy your vids. bought this for some bird shot.

[@westernpigeon]

max factor yes

[@GeekInfoTV]

I'm new to photography, I just got my 90D 3 weeks ago with an 18-55 STM kit lens, I also got the 10-18 STM lens for wide angles, and I was thinking to get this lens so that I overall cover 10-250mm (16-400mm after crop factor applied) for all kinds of needs and purposes, this lens seems an excellent choice for someone who is on budget and wants decent enough results. Thanks for the review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to help out.

[@marknongkhlaw1674]

Wow great range

[@mikeonlinebaby]

Been thinking about getting this lens as I have the Canon 18-55mm IS STM lens, now got this lens coming my way soon, thank you for the video review Dustin.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@MiniArt_Studio]

Which camera 🎥 is suitable for my youtube videos shoots.. can you you recommend any cheap and best camera,,,,?

[@vaishakhpullariyann]

mine is Eos 600D will it fix for that(55-250) ??

[@yawerabbas6316]

yes

[@karikodefamily]

Nice review you look very comfortable and well spoken while informative

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you

[@robbitter9524]

Thanks Dustin - just bought the 55-250 STM based on your review... Greetings from Holland

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy

[@uscfroadie]

Thanks for the excellent review. I bought mine on eBay brand new for $159 shipped. That makes it an even better bang for the buck lens. Highly recommended for newbies.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+uscfroadie Wow. Great price for a great lens.

[@jasonf6182]

Just purchased this lens for my 40D...found your video very informative... learned a bit about it. Thanks alot

[@3004atul]

is it compatible with canon 1200d eos

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Atul Jain Absolutely.

[@TheJudge064]

Any lens made by canon since 1987 will work on your APS-C camera.

[@aussiecoastie72]

Excellent , I want this lens for bird photography

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@slxvcq9938]

Hey Dustin! A couple of weeks ago i bought the Canon 2000D with the 18-55 kit lens and im loving them! My question is, do you recommend this lens as a second lens for me? Or is the 18-135 better? Thank you!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think this is an excellent compliment to the kit lens.

[@Randolph_]

My motorsports lens since 2018. Where i live, it’s not easy to save money for better lenses so this is all i have for shooting races

[@jenlauder1073]

Enjoyed your review. Very comprehensive and understandable.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@stephenlikestools6846]

As always your episodes are excellent Dustin. Thank you for your efforts. I have used the 55-250STM a great deal on the M1 (home built 2.5 magnification LCD cushioned viewfinder) and some on the 7D1, and recently compared the experience and results of my 300 f4L IS. Love my f4L and the images are better, but the IS of the more modern 55-250 STM is truley twice as good. With good PS skills, good support and generous amounts of frames I was able to get from empty nest to fledglings of a an Anna's Hummer with the 55-250 STM IS and the meager EOS-M version 1. Plenty of detail and accurate colors, from about 15 feet away peeking from behind a tree without mother chasing me away but a couple times.

[@stephenlikestools6846]

+Stephen Likes Tools I will add, I recommend skipping a UV etc protector on that lens to get the most from the $300 lens, just use the hood and release all of its potential.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Stephen Likes Tools Good feedback, Stephen

[@geonerd]

Thanks. I'm shopping for a medium-distance 'critter' lens, and this seems to be a very good candidate.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a good value lens that gives you some reach

[@johndelacruz90]

Excellent review. Thank you very much.

[@Trojan0304]

Got this in kit with 18-135 nano usm. Thanks for useful review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Nice. Enjoy!

[@RJ-xj9ql]

Hello Dustin: I mounted this lens to a Canon M5 using an adapter (EF to EF M). What effect this will have on the zoom? Thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Nothing other than adapting the focus system sometimes has a few minor quirks.

[@Thatdudesolitude]

this was very informative and concise. you broke everything down when everyone could understand it. just got a new sub

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@MarioLPinedaA4123]

Can i use it w. my canon eos M3 with adapter..?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Mario L. Pineda A. Yes, just make sure that both the camera and the lens are up to the most recent firmware to get the maximum performance.

[@MarioLPinedaA4123]

Of course you can...

[@aliasdmr]

Dustin Abbott would the IS function from the lens and PI & CA correction from the body keep in function?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Sintang Damar Apriliastyo It does, yes.

[@kristinhenning6559]

Dustin, thanks for your reviews. We have had the old Canon 75-300mm for 10+ years. But we have to replace. I understand the cheaper 75-300mm is probably not worth getting these days, but this 55-250mm rates very well. However I'm concerned about stepping back from 300mm to 250mm. We want it for wildlife photography in Africa amongst other things. Do you think we'll notice the 50mm? The price step up to the newer 70-300 USM is large, but wondering what you think about going from a 300 back to 250mm...? Cheers

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Optically the 55-250 is much better. Frankly I think you could crop that extra 50mm and still have better resolution. And yes, the 70-300 USM II is a nice upgrade.

[@pablolovsu]

This lens is supported on any canon apsc bodies, i.e from 1100d to 7d mark ii

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Raunak Das That is correct

[@pablolovsu]

Dustin Abbott thanx

[@stanuc2utube]

Thank you, excellent professional review. Very refreshing. Been in the business for 40 years.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad it was helpful!

[@BigAntTVMedia]

I use this for high school football and track also the 7D2 can be used with it

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Big Ant TV Productions LLC It would work fine in fairly well lit environments like that. Indoor sports typically require a faster aperture.

[@BigAntTVMedia]

indoor it sucks i need a 70-200 f2.8 mark 2 badly i have 5d3 now too for badly lit sports

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Big Ant TV Productions LLC there's a reason why that lens can be seen next to every basketball court in the NBA.

[@dansaghin1]

Great review, it is better than the Tamron 70-300 VC? I have that lens and it`s amazing. (I use it on a Canon 70D).

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Dan Saghin I don't know that it is better. The Tamron is a strong lens (I owned it prior to owning the 70-300L).

[@jayscranktv2050]

DUSTIN. nice review..Thumbs up for this.. sir can you help me what lens to pick.. this 55-250mm is stm or the tamron 18-200mm xr di II LD. which is better for everyday photography sir??thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

What other lenses do you have? 55mm on a crop sensor is not very wide at all.

[@jayscranktv2050]

i have 18-55mm is stm sir but i am planing to upgrade it with zoom lens and i want to ask you sir as a professional if what to pick the tamron 18-200mm or the canon 55-250mm sir

[@jayscranktv2050]

+Dustin Abbott sir i am a newly in photography i just want a direct guide sir if what should i pick. tamron 18-200mm or canon 55-250mm. plss help me sir thank you..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Jay Ar Pasion If you keep the 18-55 and add this lens you will have a nice little kit. If you prefer to only use one lens and not chance lenses, go with the Tamron.

[@supunbatagoda8061]

Great review. one quick question, does this fit for my 77D? Thanks!

[@paddyola1]

it will

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Definitely will

[@Karnosas]

Hi Dustin. Currently I need to buy a lens in the 18-300mm range. A zoom lens. I have the Canon 50mm f/1.8, Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8, and Canon EF-S 24 f/2.8. I have seen your videos and I was impressed by the Canon 50-250mm IS STM that you talked about very well, years ago. My camera is a Canon 77D which is APSC. I would like to know if the Canon 50-250mm IS STM lens is better than the Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM II or if it is even better than the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5- 5.6 IS USM ['Nano']. ¿Which of those three should I buy? I want a lens that allows for sharp photos but is not that expensive. I can't spend on the L series and the Sigma Art is very expensive here in Peru. I also don't want to buy glasses that are second hand or used. Please appreciate your comments and suggestions. Thank you.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If you can afford it, grab the Canon 70-300 with the Nano USM. It's a great value for money.

[@Karnosas]

Ok. Thanks. Another brand that you recommend me?

[@lmallard3788]

The amazing capability of eos 80d, with all the cross type focus points, I really don't do manual focus. I guess when I want to do manual focus, it will be when I can buy an L series lens. Thanks for your video.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Fair enough. Enjoy!

[@TheDeepPlanet]

Thank you for a very informative video. Just got one of these lenses for $200 Australian and its huge upgrade from my old EF 90 - 300 1:4.5 -5.6that I've had for over 10 years. Coupled with the Canon 80D the autofocus is so quiet and fast, you sometimes can't even believe you have achieved focus!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's pretty great, isn't it!

[@iUnderdog1]

I just purchased the Canon EOS Rebel T100 (18-55mm lens kit), and thinking about this lens. 1st question is, is it compatible, and good for an upgrade? Would like to take shots of the moon, various shots at beach, etc.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a good option for your camera.

[@charlesfisher2134]

Did you ever review the canon 77 D camera ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I did not.

[@mikehurdiss226]

As ever, really useful and objective review. Many thanks👍

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure.

[@baron6445]

Great review Dustin, I want this Lens for my 7d mark ii, can i use the Canon 2x EF Extender III ??

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Baron I doubt that it will physically fit, nor would it autofocus. This isn't a lens designed for use with extenders.

[@Hipnosis65]

New to photography... loved the review. Didn’t understand it all, but loved it. 😀 Subscribed.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Well, if you subscribed, you'll understand more in time!

[@Itsamitkban]

Sir great detailed review. Please tell me with Canon 200D Kit lenses 18-55mm and 55-250mm or just leave those 2 and go for Tamron 18-200 mm. Which will give better quality. Your opinion will be of great help. I am a beginner. Thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The two lens kit gives the better image quality; the Tamron gives more convenience.

[@Itsamitkban]

Thank you so much Sir for you quick response. Suppose I go for the two kit lens, will carrying just the 55-250 mm during travels be sufficient for most purposes or have to carry the 18-55 mm also most of the time. As I said I am a beginner.

[@Itsamitkban]

Please look into my query

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You would most likely need to carry both lenses, which is why some people choose the 18-200 even though the image quality isn't quite as good.

[@Itsamitkban]

Thanks a lot. What abt Canon 18-135 or Canon 18-200? Please give ur opinion

[@marknongkhlaw1674]

I've seen some guys who've modded this lens to fit a speedbooster with EF to EF-M mount by replacing the mount plate and using that to increase the aperture (although this can also increase the focal lengths too about 62-284). They say by doing that it improves the bokeh. However, won't it also reduce the quality of the photos? I mounted it on a full frame camera and it gives me a photo of only 9 megapixels. Not sure if this will be the same on a crop sensor+speedbooster 🤔 Your thoughts?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Speedboosters are hit and miss, in my experience. I'm not quite sure how it would work here, as typically speedboosters are used with full frame lenses on APS-C cameras. That wouldn't be the case with EF-S to EF-M.

[@marknongkhlaw1674]

@@DustinAbbottTWI you're right in pointing that out. And then there's also a risk of the speedbooster glass touching the cam sensor if one uses the wrong or faulty mod. Thanks a lot for the insight 🙏

[@zac.d.photographyyonig7213]

By ghosting were you refering to lens flare? Btw i'm getting this lens at christmas. Can't wait!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

An aspect of lens flare, yes, namely little blobs of green or magenta color that come from the sun hitting the elements.

[@Simi-bq8dp]

Hi, I'm thinking about buying this lens and Canon 750D to record makeup videos for KZbin. What do you think about this combination? Thank you in advance!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hmm, I think you may find the focal length a little long unless you've got a fair bit of space in your "studio" space. Something like the 40mm f/2.8 STM might be a better choice for what you want.

[@Simi-bq8dp]

I was thinking about EF-S 55-250mm because of its zoom capacity. Sometimes I want to focus more on my eyes or on my lips and I thought this one would be a good choice.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You know your working environment. If you've got enough room, go for it.

[@cashinondt8431]

18-135mm better for video work~

[@marknongkhlaw1674]

Rather stupid question, but is STM written on the lens body? I see only "Image Stabilizer" on it. Need to make sure I got the right lens. Thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I can't remember that. It would certainly be on the box.

[@marknongkhlaw1674]

Stupid me. It's written on the lens where the lens glass is

[@JosephBolen]

I recently purchased the Canon EOS M50 and I wish to add a budget telephoto lens. I’m debating between the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens and the Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 Image Stabilization STM Lens. I feel the 250mm (with crop factor 400mm), price and sharpness is the better decision over the EF-M telephoto. Do you have any advice to assist in my decision making? 🤨

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I struggled with the same decision myself years ago. The 55-200 is a much better fit in terms of size, but the performance is fairly similar. Neither is a bad choice.

[@jeffersondizon1760]

Great review! Just a question, can this be used in portrait photography if you're in a budget? Thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Sure. It's pretty good at most things for the price.

[@richie007brown]

Just bought one, great video once again.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy your new lens.

[@sidneystanley2465]

1st of all, a well put together video. I use both these lenses & fully agree with you. I mainly do bird photography and tend to use the 55-250 most of the time. being a much lighter lens its easier to carry around & handle than the 100-400, down side, there are times you could do with the extra reach,

[@marknongkhlaw1674]

What camera do you use, and what settings are best for bird photography? I sometimes find it too soft for birds, especially at the long end although I use f5.6 or 8

[@williamneuman7783]

I want to upgrade from my Canon 55-250mm IS II. From reviews I have seen the STM version is a little sharper.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's true.

[@rafidhassanoney4007]

which one is better between Canon EF-S 18-135mm IS STM and Canon EF-S 55-250mm IS STM on Canon 70D?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Rafid hassan oney That depends on your needs. The 55-250 has better image quality, but doesn't go very wide at all. You will need a second lens to cover the wider focal lengths.

[@AmericanConstellation]

I just bought one. It's a good budget lens.

[@humbertomorales4364]

good video, very affordable lens, thank you for the info.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to help out.

[@mikeclark3013]

I have this lens and am enjoying it a lot. I have a question: I know it’s not a macro lens, but it says on the side “macro 0.85m/2.8 ft.” I have been able to get some nice close shots, but I’m confused by the “macro” notation on the lens. Thanks for the review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

They commonly cite "macro" on Canon lenses to indicate the minimum focus distance. People seem to understand "macro" better than "MFD". It's pretty common.

[@mikeclark3013]

Dustin Abbott Thank you. This seems to be an excellent lens, especially for the price.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is that - one of the serious values in the Canon lineup.

[@nicolea9509]

Would this be a good lens on a canon t6i for shooting horses, and cattle? Horses would be jumping over jumps and moving very fast

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It focuses fairly quickly. I think it would work for you.

[@anyaclark901]

dead ahahahah

[@TXGrackle]

I ended up getting this lens with an aftermarket hood. Excited to see how it performs.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The hood will function fine, if that is your concern.

[@TXGrackle]

Dustin Abbott My main concern was really the lens itself. Gotta say, met all of my expectations.

[@shatimaclark55]

Is this good for product photography?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

No particularly. It's focal length starts long and gets longer.

[@grauraum]

For the m system... 55-200 is better than ef-s 55-250? The m lens costs about 100€ more. Is it 100€ better in your opinion? (already got an ef-to-m adapter)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

No, I wouldn't say that it is worth that much more. You'll need to make sure that your adapter and the lens are both updated to the most recent firmware as otherwise AF doesn't work right, but it's fine afterwards.

[@grauraum]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks for your quick response! Please keep on making such informative videos!

[@F84WarEAGLE]

Hi! How does this lens compare to Canon 200 f/2.8 L USM II in terms of sharpness on APS-C cameras?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Pretty well, actually. Take a look at this tool to compare at difference apertures. www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=856&Camera=963&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=245&Sample=0&CameraComp=963&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

[@F84WarEAGLE]

Thanks a lot!

[@rowen0fstrata]

Hey Dustin. I’m wavering back and forth between a 55-250mm and a 70-200mm f/4L. I can get the 55 for $150 brand new, and the 70-200 L for 999 brand new. My question is, how does the image quality really compare between the two? Is is really that much of a difference? A $750 difference? I would be using this on a cropped sensor, 90D to be exact. So not even sure if the benefits of an L would even show. I would be shooting landscape only. Never focusing on one part of the image over another. Never portrait. Also looking for that nice compression effect, exaggerating the background. Thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

There’s no question that the 70-200 is better, but it might hard to argue a $750 difference if you’re on a tight budget.

[@jasminerivers7446]

i have the original lens (not STM) and have never put it on because i have the 50mm 1.8 currently attached and loving it. is it any good?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's an okay lens, but the STM version is much better.

[@23wewee]

Really considering this lens! Is it good for moon photography at 250mm? Thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

For sure.

[@23wewee]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you!

[@KL-gv9jw]

Great review, I got one for my M3 and it works fine and the IQ is excellent as you introduced.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad to hear it.

[@buzzer1552]

Is good for landscape and up close photography?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Sure. It’s a good budget option

[@6rimR3ap3r]

I've used my EF 70-300 IS USM (non II, non L) for ~8-9 years now. Recently switched from 1000D to M5 and I think you really have to stop down to f/8 or above for good IQ. Would you say this would be a decent replacement in terms of image quality at wider or same aperture settings? Or rather the native EF-M?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If you are using the M5 primarily, go for the EF-M lens. It’s much smaller and more convenient. Very good optically, too.

[@tamaradeklein1017]

Would this lense be nice for horse photography and sport photography. Had a 70-300 Canon lens, but am looking to upgrade a little bit, but am not quite sure about this lens...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a good option, as is the newer 70-300mm IS II lens.

[@tamaradeklein1017]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you for the quick reply!

[@richardpcrowe]

How does this lens compare with the Sony 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS except that the Sony is a half stop slower at max aperture.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I owned the 55-210 for a while, but I never found it very easy to focus with, and thus I didn't get as many keepers. I would prefer the Canon lens, actually

[@diegobrava]

Hi Dustin, Great Vídeo! The big question is whether to choose 55-250mm (for portability + image stabilization + cost/benefit) or the 70-200mm (for clarity + image sharpness + best long-term investment). Taking into account the use basically for PORTRAITS, with the use of Canon Speedlite Flash Speedlite 430EX III, which would you indicate between the two lenses in question? I believe it is the doubt of many. Thank you in advance!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If your priority is portraits, go with the 70-200mm

[@lmallard3788]

Would ef 70-200 f4L is2 usm be a worthwhile upgrade to the efs 55-250 f4-5.6 is stm? I shoot all focal lengths of the stm lens at f5.6. I'd hope to be able to use f4 with the 70-200??

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is a solid upgrade. It's a fantastic lens.

[@MLGSlayer1203]

I have a canon eos 200d ii... is this telephoto lens good for sports photos?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It’s not bad, though you will need decent light. This is not a fast lens in terms of the aperture.

[@MLGSlayer1203]

@@DustinAbbottTWI what lens would you recommend

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The 70-200mm F2.8 lenses are often popular choices for sports.

[@Cristiano-c1b6n]

sir dis is comfortable to canon 1500d? plss tel me sir

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It will work fine on your camera

[@stefanvidinaru2346]

But I have a question. If you buy this lens and then change body passing to a full frame, could you still use this lens ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

No, you could not. It will not physically mount.

[@marknongkhlaw1674]

It does mount with the same Ef to efm adapter, but then the FF camera mostly goes into crop mode and the image is only 9 megapixels

[@jimballsmith7443]

Hi Dustin, I love your videos and write ups as they have helped me a lot! I am not a professional but enjoy the hobby and taking pics of friends/family and out doors. I’m currently using a M50 and am looking for a good telephoto lens for the range I’m missing. Right now, I have the 15-45 EFM is stm Kit lens, EF 50mm 1.8 (with viltrox speed booster and the cannon mount adapter), and the 10-18mm which I really don’t use a whole lot. I’m currently debating between EFS 55-250mm IS STM in this video and the Tamron 18-200mm Di iii VC that you reviewed as well. The price points and quality on both seem great. Comparing both, which would you say has the better image quality overall? Any advice since you have used and reviewed both of these? Thanks! -ethan

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would say go for either the 55-250 or the EF-M 55-200mm. The later is smaller and lighter and has excellent image quality as well.

[@jimballsmith7443]

Thank you so much for your response!

[@billperry6101]

does the 55-250 is stm work better on a full frame camera and which one when taking pictures not video

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It does not work at all on a full frame camera. It physically will not fit.

[@andrewlamb3159]

Hello Dustin. I enjoy your reviews very much thank you. I have a question. I have been using this lens for a number of years now on a 100d and enjoy airshow photography . I have been given a 60D and would like to upgrade my lens. I had thought about the Sigma or Tamron 100-400 but would like a lens I could use for travel etc. would I see a lot of difference if I upgraded to a Canon EF 70-300MM F/4-5.6L IS USM. Your help would be much appreciated. Thank you

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You would see some but not much difference. This lens is fairly good optically.

[@andrewlamb3159]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you for your quick reply . I guess I would benefit from the extra reach or carry on saving for a 400. It would be the toss up between the Sigma and the Tamron. 👍

[@dylanhamilton7755]

Would this be a good lens for filming football games at night?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You might get some autofocus hunting in lower light, but it does a decent job on a budget.

[@fhxxxbikony5003]

Would it compliment well with Canon 800D?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Definitely will

[@fhxxxbikony5003]

@@DustinAbbottTWI yay thank you

[@firealarmapprentice4517]

I own and use the Canon 70-300mm and it is NOT a disappointment when it comes to image quality.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Which version? Version II is much, much better.

[@firealarmapprentice4517]

@@DustinAbbottTWI its version 3, but I wish it had IS

[@ramanjaneyareddy5070]

This is support for 1300d?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes there is.

[@marlonbataga7179]

I owned a canon 700d + ef-s 55-250mm is stm lens...any advise in settings if i want to shoot the sunset and sunrise? thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes - put the camera into Live View and visually see what you like best. In those settings a slight underexposure actually produces a more dynamic image.

[@davemears8272]

Good review. I'm buying a renewed one for less than £200 and can't wait to use it.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hope you enjoy it!

[@widnyanasantika9403]

Hi Dustin, I have Canon 750D, I am confuse what is better 55-250 f/4 IS STM or Canon 70-300 IS USM. have a suggest?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would go for the 55-250. It's a better APS-C focal length and much cheaper.

[@coldeb8911]

Another Great informative video Dustin, your getting quite Popular over here in the UK 🇬🇧 actually.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's good news! The UK is my second largest market, I believe.

[@NomadicRockstar]

Which lens is better sigma 70-300 or cannon 55-250 please ask

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

This lens is a pretty great value. I see no reason to purchase the Sigma over it unless you need the 300mm of reach.

[@scouserkopite7580]

Very nice review. But i am under budget , even though i like the 55-250mm .i will go for 50mm is stm .thanxs for the review , i will buy that later .

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy the lens!

[@SomeswarDeChoudhury95]

I received it Yesterday!❤ It's a worthy Purchase!🎉

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy it

[@yujeen97]

May i ask if this particular lens is compatible with the Canon EOS 550D?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It definitely is

[@yujeen97]

cheers mate!

[@unknownperson9193]

sir! how much the performance of this lense for macro photography?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's okay, but nothing like a real macro lens.

[@meguys6900]

is it good for portraits ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's hard to know what your expectations are, but yes, you could use this for portraiture.

[@ahmedrazza220]

Can we use it on Canon 1000D

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You definitely can

[@cglasadventure8473]

i have canon 70D and i want a budget telephoto lens...for wildlife... this is good or what? please tell..thanks

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Two quality choices: this one or the Tamron 70-300 VC. Both nice lenses and very strong optically for the money.

[@BritishAgriPhotography]

Does the eos 1300d work with this? Please reply

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes it does

[@BritishAgriPhotography]

Dustin Abbott thanks awesome

[@josephscott3197]

The STM system is way batter at autofocus than USM. Guess it depends on the camera as well, but USM has to much noise from clicking gears for video.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

For video noise, yes, and for smoothness of focus pulls. For stills photography, however, I would take USM any day of the week.

[@marknongkhlaw1674]

I think the Nano USM is silent

[@hebertzachary2155]

Is it competitive with the canon 70-200

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You'll have to be more specific - there are lot of 70-200 lenses.

[@hebertzachary2155]

Dustin Abbott yeah sorry I meant the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

[@AlHujjahIslamicSeminary]

hi, can i used on canon 6d mark 2 or mark 4 or mark 3 thank you

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You cannot. EF-S lenses will not physically mount on Canon full frame bodies.

[@c7boychii]

would this be good for my canon SL1?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

+Jaylan Nelson Definitely, I'd say. It is light enough to still balance okay on the smaller body, and has very nice image quality.