Canon R6 Mark II vs Canon R7 | Shocking Results

ThinkTank Camera Bag - bit.ly/3y7LDA8
I took the Canon R6 Mark II against the Canon R7 with the 24-70 2.8 RF lens and I was shocked on which camera performed best. Check out these amazing results from both cameras.
Best Place to License Music for Real Estate Video's - www.epidemicsound.com/referra...
Canon 15-35 RF 2.8 amzn.to/3H4Ztcj
Canon 70-200 RF 2.8 amzn.to/3iyhB4d
Canon 24-70 RF 2.8 amzn.to/3XNwAa
Canon 70-200 RF F4 amzn.to/3Y8aeRc
Best Audio Recorders
Tascam XLR-2D amzn.to/3hGN2JD
Tascam Portacapture X8 amzn.to/40kgMNM
Sennheiser MKE6600 amzn.to/3WyVfhw
Sennheiser MKE 416 amzn.to/3FRALKk
DJI Wireless MIC amzn.to/3upatJP
More Gear I use
Tamron 24-70 G2 amzn.to/3YDOa1b
Lexar 256GB V90 II Professional Card amzn.to/3PPLsBE
Godox X2T/ TT600 Flash Comobo amzn.to/3HXHVzp
Atomos Ninja V+ amzn.to/3YHB2Id
My Camera's
Canon R6 Mark II amzn.to/3ixYBmo
Canon R6 amzn.to/3VMqYve
Canon R7 amzn.to/3H0SWiV
Zhiyun Crane 2s amzn.to/3VLKc4G
Drones:
DJI Mavic 3 Pro Fly More Kit amzn.to/3Wgwo2i
DJI Mavic Classic amzn.to/3BWeg5R
DJI Pro Controller amzn.to/3GdBczL
DJI RC Controller amzn.to/3VeQQiV
Best USB-C Charger for Canon amzn.to/3Hc3LyC
360 Tour Gear
Samyang/Rokinon 12mm Full Frame amzn.to/3Y3GMvq
Samyang/Rokionon 8mm APS-C amzn.to/3Hm9D6S
Panorama Head amzn.to/40lyHnf
#canonr6markII #canonr6II #canonr7 #canon #canonusa #thinktankphoto

[@redditsucksyo]

Bought the R7 at launch, bought a few of the primes and then bought the 24-70 because it was on sale and there was a cashback on top.. been having lots of fun with that combo.. it is my preferred walk around setup at the moment. The only letdown is that it is not as usable for indoors product photography as I'd like. The RF 35 should also get an honorable mention being that it is essentially a 50mm with IS on the R7 which is unheard of for full frame plus that thing is sharp.

[@JaredHoyman]

If you can light the products well, then the R7 is fantastic for product photography, but if you want a low light king then the R6 II. I have both for a reason. They are excellent.

[@rajeshnahar5585]

Hey, which lenses do you use for product photography with your R6 mkii? I am planning to go with R6 mark ii. 😊

[@cephotoclub]

I have the R6ii and the R7 to double my lenses. I have kept all my EF lenses and use the EF to RF adapter with the filters. I can easily swap lenses from 14mm to 24-70 for example and have full use of a ND filter in the adapter. Its the best thing since sliced bread, being able to just swap out lenses and have ND or PL already available to use. And with the full frame and crop keeping the max apertures on your lenses just by swapping bodies. Its the best....................highly recommend.

[@JaredHoyman]

That would be a great option on the R7 with the sigma 18-35 1.8 EF since it’s so wide.

[@jefftaz7401]

Great video, enjoyed seeing the difference between the R6 ii and R7. For future videos, would like to see one on how you shoot detail shots for real-estate. I heard that a 50mm prime works well in that situation.

[@philiprolenick4475]

Been using the R7 since it came out and use the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II on it. Just got the Sigma RF-S 18-50mm f/2.8. It's the size of the original kit lens but as sharp as the 24-70mm - and much lighter! A great walk-around lens. Also have the RF 85mm f/2 Macro and the EF 200mm f/2.8L II with 1.4x TC for an effective 448mm on the R7. I'm hoping for a stacked sensor R7 mark II for low light.

[@JaredHoyman]

I may have to try out the new sigmas.

[@philiprolenick4475]

The just-released RF-S 18-50mm Sigma is the first Canon -licensed 3rd party AF lens. Its manual focus ring is actually an unlabeled Focus/Control ring. You set its function in the camera's setup menu on the last page of the AF tab.

[@Onthemovewithsos]

Dope video man I’m thinking of getting the R6 mark 2 thank you for explaining

[@JaredHoyman]

Thank you! It's a great camera!

[@MiQBohlin]

Very interesting test and info. I’m very close to order a R7 but haven’t decided yet which lens to go for.

[@bengrant4044]

You may want to look into the r8 as well. It comes out next month and is basically a mini r6. Same full frame sensor just less features.

[@mike.k]

@@bengrant4044 yup

[@lb7144]

Awesome demonstration of these two wonderful cameras. I just picked up an R6 MKII and it doesn’t disappoint for what I do. What I really enjoy about the R62 is I can adapt my EF & my EF-S lenses. The crop is automatic for the EF-S Canon lenses. I have all the STM EF-S and EF STM which all function amazingly on the R62. I get the benefits of full frame RF glass and the duality of EF/EF-S functionality out of the R62 when adapted. I use the drop in variable ND filter adapter.

[@JaredHoyman]

It is an amazing camera. I’ll be doing a Canon R6ii one yr later video soon. Spoiler….still my favorite.

[@samipuola]

Instead of having both FF and aps-c, i have R7 with speedbooster and normal ef/rf-adapter. Both are great with ef-lenses (like ef16-35Lis2 and ef50/1.2L). This has made my 6Dmk2 obsolete. Only rf-lenses i have are rf-s10-18 and rf100-500L. Both for wild life. The latter is a stunning beast.

[@JaredHoyman]

The 100-500 is on my wishlist.

[@bparis]

Do you know how the footage from the R6II in crop mode compares to the R7? That would give you a similar field of view, but just wondering if there is a drop in quality when just using a crop of the full frame.

[@JaredHoyman]

Right now both cameras do oversampling giving excellent sharpness. The r7 oversamples from a 7k image where the r6 II oversamples from a 6k image to 4k. If you crop into the R6 II you are losing that oversampled image and the detail is not as defined. Let me know if that helps answer your question.

[@pokeypop99]

Great review and definitely not what I expected when I clicked in. I was fully expecting a comparison of AF, IBIS, MP and all that stuff. Your take is very intriguing. I'm weighing buying "a" new body, and depending on my choice, I may swap out a pretty significant investment in lenses. I'd been looking at it from FF vs crop vs MFT. Your perspective on having multiple bodies (FF and crop) is interesting. I'll want to do the price math on that, but it almost seems like one could have one or two fewer lenses in the bag if you did a body swap instead of having a lens for every occasion fitted to whatever sensor you have. Especially helpful to me was your consideration of "look" and bokeh comparing focal length and crop factor! Nice insight!

[@JaredHoyman]

Thank you for the comment! Once you think of your camera's as tools you can start organizing them in your workflow as a tool. The Full Frame 35mm serves a purpose and so does the APS-C and even The Micro 4/3. Counting my Mavic 3 Pro I have all three of those sensors in my workflow and they all work perfectly for what I use them for. I have been on a F4 Lens kick over 2.8 and I think that will be a video in the not so distant future.

[@priceanderson7336]

Thank you for your afirmation about having both a full frame and a crop! i was begining to think I was crazy for thinking this. I go one step further and ad my M body! I mean we all try to have lenses to cover a full range of reach having various bodies just makes sense to me. However you dont see many videos about putting together a kit to cover various body needs like you do lenses.

[@JaredHoyman]

That's true. Aps-cis like an advanced speedbooster that works on all lenses. Maybe that's my next vid.

[@gerhardbotha7336]

The sensor size has nothing to do with the f-stop setting required. It is like saying you need to drop the f-stop when cropping because you use less light. Not true. Dynamic range is the ability of a single pixel sensor to measure from dark to light. It does not know how big the sensor is. These sensors on the R7 is just smaller than on the R6. They are the same size as you would have had at 82mp on a full frame. So tell the FF crowd that high rez sensors have less DR than low rez units and watch the fun reactions- same thing. I fully agree with the statement of using the R7 as a tool for reach within the RF eco system . That is what it is meant for. It is not an entry level thing.

[@JaredHoyman]

I agree and I may not have done a good job explaining that. The 32mp on a crop is pretty amazing.

[@TeddyCavachon]

Good glass is the great equalizer, why when becoming joined at the lens mount to Canon in 2004 with an 8MP 20D I also purchased the 24-70mm 2.8 L and 70-200mm 2.8 L IS along with the very good 10-20mm EF-S. Because of the IQ of the lenses I didn’t upgrade my DSLR past the 15MP 50D because with skilled post processing the combination of IQ was more than adequate for sharing photos on-line and making prints up to 16 x 20 and even larger, depending on the subject. Starting in 2012 when I got a iPad with 1080p camera and iMovie I started shooting and posting videos and realized I was getting more and better feedback from them than I ever had posting stills on web pages. I started using my DSLR gear less because shooting and editing video on phone/tablet was far more convenient. What motivated me to buy a new mirrorless camera this year was a new interest in shooting wildlife and a desire to up my video game. I debated between the R7 and R6mkII, opting for the latter with a RF 100-500mm because I thought it the better platform for video over the long term. For everything else other than wildlife (studio portraits, events with dual 580ex flash) my 15MP 50D is still adequate for my needs.

[@JaredHoyman]

I loved my canon rebel t2i and probably could create images today with it that people would not know it came from a 13yr old entry camera.

[@TeddyCavachon]

@@JaredHoyman I forgot to add in my first comment that my primary motivation for upgrading to R6mkII was the order of magnitude improvement in AF and exposure control it has compared to DSLRs. My first hint at the potential of mirrorless was the Minolta D7Hi I bought in 2001 as “bridge” while waiting for digital DSLRs to mature and the features of the pro bodies to “trickle down” to the prosumer level. In that respect the R6mkII ticked off all the boxes of things I wanted more than the R7 did.

[@ZeldaGX]

Hey Jared! I'm coming from a Canon T8i with an EF 70-200mm IS II USM, EF 28mm, and EFS 18-55mm. I'm having a hard time deciding because I'm torn between the R6MK2 and the R7. I love the space of the R6MK2 as a full-frame, but I'd like your opinion based on the equipment I have. I'm doing a mix bag of photography right now, mostly sports but looking to get back into portraits, but no videography. I have no problem with buying an adapter if needed. This would be my first major upgrade and while my budget is tight I have no fear waiting a bit longer and save up if needed. What are your thoughts?

[@JaredHoyman]

The R7 and R6II are both amazing cameras and that is why I own both. R7 would give you extra reach for sports. The R6 II would give you a cleaner picture with less noise in lower light areas like indoor settings. I like the look of Fullframe for that shallow depth of field in portraits and some landscape. I use the R7 with the 24-70 2.8 RF at 24mm with all my talking head studio video shots because I like that look. I guess buy both ;). This probably wasn't that helpfull, but you really can't go wrong with either camera. I will tell you once I went from the canon t2i in 2012 to the Canon 6D full frame its hard to ever go back to aps-c crop sensors for your photos. There is just a special look that full frame give you.

[@lavraphilip]

Hey Jared I’m thinking about getting in to photograph and videography and this will be my first camera that I will buy and one of the things I’ll also use the camera for is to do live streaming which camera do you recommend me to use

[@JaredHoyman]

For your first camera either of these will be amazing. The R6 II would jump you into the world of full frame sensors right away, but if you want to save $1k and put that towards a good lens then the R7 is excellent. I obviously own both and enjoy both. If you have the money then I would do the R6 II first, but if that is stopping you from getting a good lens then go with the R7.

[@lavraphilip]

@@JaredHoyman ok thank you so much for your time

[@ImHeavensDemon]

Im so torn! Im very new to photography on this level. Im looking at these 32 for work. I work at a big bakery and wanting to take product photos to the next level. But also be able to film small commercial type videos for social media. Not sure which camera to pick.

[@JaredHoyman]

Both are very good. You could go with the R7, save $1000 to put dowards a lens or get the new R8 and save money towards a lens. Lenses make the camera ;) buy a good lens!

[@77dris]

I like that camera bag! And yes, I was once asked by a friend to take photos at his mom's funeral service/family gathering. Now THAT was awkward.

[@JaredHoyman]

That would be awkward.

[@Flburr99]

I don’t know. It’s not a great time sure, but on the other hand, it’s a convenient time to get extended family photos as many relatives may show up from far away, they are usually dressed nice and may not see each other again for some time. They’ll probably want group/ family photos and it’s also a good opportunity for candid/ emotional shots, which many people appreciate later. The two times families get together are weddings and funerals and the marriage rate is dropping like a rock so funerals it is. Just a thought.

[@shawnwright240]

I own the R7. It is good BUT there is another thing you missed…. the R6/R6II allow for a vertical grip…. and that would allow for a hand strap which fits so much better when having large hands like mine or almost any man. R7 is super tiny.

[@JaredHoyman]

You are not wrong with that. I actually ended up using the R7 today for product photography and if it wasn't on a tripod for the 4hr shoot my hands would have bothered me.

[@Dpixtion]

@@JaredHoymanif baffles me why Canon did not want the R7 to have a battery grip…

[@user-hq5ty6ts4t]

Afternoon Jared, Trying to compare these 2 cameras for hockey photography at the high school level. We owned the Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 is II lens. What's your thoughts? I usually take pic's from the middle of the ice or close to the blue line. Most of the glass/plexiglass we have around the rinks is terrible to shoot through. I previously had the Canon T6i but wanted to move to mirrorless. Appreciate your feedback.

[@JaredHoyman]

If you like the reach of the t6i then I would do the R7. The r6ii will give you cleaner noise when incemreasing the iso, but both perform well. I use both personally. R7 for video and portraits and r6 ii for real estate and architectural photography.

[@user-hq5ty6ts4t]

@@JaredHoyman Thank You.

[@mkamelg]

Before watching this video, I had previously seen your video titled "Canon R6 Mark II Unboxing and Unexpected Discovery". I have owned an R6 Mark II since early December 2022. The photo bag is the only antidote to that damn irritating sound of stabilization rattling in this camera model. Unfortunately, at the time when I was buying this camera model, I also bought myself the first photographic backpack in many years to relieve my spine, and I was unpleasantly surprised. This model of the camera with the lens attached to it cannot be carried in a backpack, i.e. when the camera is closer to the head and is usually directed with the lens downwards. Just go to a place where there is no urban bustle, and with every step you take, you will hear a single rattle of stabilization. You usually carry a photo bag around your hips or move it on your back (i.e. it is very far from your ears), thanks to which this problem is, as they say, "survivable".

[@JaredHoyman]

It is odd that it makes this noise and the R6 does not and neither does the R7. Wonder if it was an overlook in the production of the camera.

[@AkaBull]

Don't forget the R6 mkii has an in body crop, so you don't necessarily have to buy an APC if you have this camera or one with the crop feature.

[@JaredHoyman]

True, but the R7 is 32mp and youn have the native crop plus you can crop even further still retaining high resolution where the R6 II is 24mp and once you crop in its more like 15mp.

[@AkaBull]

@@JaredHoymanVery true, didn't think of that one lol. You got me there 🤭

[@PhotoSportiv]

@@JaredHoyman if you constantly want to think about cropping, maybe you should buy a pair of scissors 🤣

[@beckypearman5301]

I bought the R6 II because of the in-body crop. I shoot horse events and much of the time need the lens reach. I honestly cannot tell the difference in stills while shooting cropped.

[@michelecintramika8482]

​@@JaredHoyman I have an EOS R that has 30 megapixel and with the crop it gets 11Mpx. How does the R6II that has 24Mpx stay with 15Mpx?

[@PatrikSkiffardFoto]

Hey, im actually looking at getting back to photography after 10 years of doing diffrent stuff, i had the 5D mk2 is the R6 mk2 the only sane full sensor choice ? Or am i overlokking something?

[@JaredHoyman]

What do you mean by "sane"? There are other canon full frame but the r6ii is a great option and blows away any canon dslr.

[@PatrikSkiffardFoto]

@@JaredHoyman so, after checking some more im just curious to what you think, is it better to go R8 and put my money towards L Lenses instead or start out with R6 Mk2 with a standard lens on it and after time get the L ones i prefer?

[@amalarvind4682]

Hello Jared! Can you recommend a sd card for 4k Video shooting in R6 mark ii.

[@JaredHoyman]

This is one I have been using since release of the r6 ii and it works great. The v60 version is not good though so stick to v90. www.amazon.com/dp/B09RGV6CCW/ref=cm_sw_r_as_gl_apa_gl_i_EK7SJFTYS8Q3ZNBJZZ1P?linkCode=ml2&tag=visibletour06-20

[@JaredHoyman]

Which camera do you do like the best with the Canon 24-70 2.8 RF?

[@danieltdavis9788]

10 years ago was the 5D Mark III, you could use 3200 iso images

[@adude394]

Very interesting stuff, and much food for thought here. I guess I'm following your suggestion to have full-frame and APS-C bodies, since I've got my beloved 1DX Mk III and 7D Mk II. Not only do I not plan to get rid of those DSLRs, I'll probably be buried with them, along with my 20D and a 20-year-old 300D. I had been giving serious thought to adding the R6 Mk II to my kit after the first of the year, but now I need to rejigger my thinking. Perhaps the R7 is a better fit, not to mention quite a bit less expensive than the 6.2. (I could conceivably get both, but I'm happily married and would prefer to stay that way. 🤣) With the exception of an old Tokina 19-35 and a Sigma 150-600 Contemporary that I'll be getting for Christmas, all of my glass is Canon EF or EF-S. I've already looked into how a Canon lens would work on an R-series body using both the EF > RF adapter and a 1.4x teleconverter, and from what I understand, it would work quite well albeit with losing one stop. So, maybe the R7 is a better idea after all. Thanks for posting this!

[@JaredHoyman]

I can relate about the happily married and wanting to remain so ;). If I'm on the fence for awhile on a lens or a camera body my wife more times than not will tell me to just get it although she couldn't care any less about photography. I'm a year an a half into using the R7 and I don't see myself getting rid of it anytime soon. It's the best aps-c camera I have ever used.

[@newvillagefilms]

I'm debating which one to get, an R6 MII or an R7 to replace my old broken 5D MKIII. I do a mix bag of photography as a hobby. I like the full frame feature of the R6 and the 33MP feature of the R7. I'd like to be able to use my old Canon EF lenses still. What do you recommend?

[@JaredHoyman]

Since you are coming from 5d mark iii I would go with the r6 ii and buy the $99 ef to rf adapter while you start transitioning to rf glass. You won't regret it. 24mp will still impress you with the image you get from it.

[@rajeshnahar5585]

Can anyone suggest which one to go for product photography and product videograohy? Also with what lens combination?

[@JaredHoyman]

That's a good and loaded question. Either would be great. It will be the lens that matters. Depending on the product and size of the product will determine what you want. Small detailed items may require the 100mm 2.8 RF MACRO L. General purpose you could use the 24-105 f4 RF. You don't need a narrow depth of field for product, yet on the contrary you want to stop down to f5.6 or 8 to get more of the product in focus.

[@rajeshnahar5585]

@@JaredHoyman Thanx, so the same recommendation would apply even to tabletop videography?

[@JaredHoyman]

@@rajeshnahar5585to give you an idea I have used 24-70 on top down video but lately I use the 10-18mm RF on the canon r7.

[@ks905kingsolomon4]

I am shooting street interviews. I’ll be buying my first camera. I had r6 mark ii in mind but after seeing this I’m thinking I can same money and get the same quality in the r7. Which should I buy for street interviews??

[@JaredHoyman]

If your interviews are mostly during the day the r7 maybe the most practical choice. Where the r6ii shines is in low light situations and with full frame you get shallower depth of field in a larger frame. I use the R7 for 95% of my youtube videos. All the vids in my studio are from the R7 over the last yr.

[@ks905kingsolomon4]

@@JaredHoyman I was almost sold on the R7 but I did forget to mention I’ll probably be doing my interviews most of the time at night maybe 25% day 75% night 😩. Thank you for your response. So being that im shooting at night does that mean im better off with R6 Mark ii?

[@JaredHoyman]

@ks905kingsolomon4 r6ii then. Affiliate link below if you decide to buy online. You will love the camera.

[@ks905kingsolomon4]

@@JaredHoyman thanks much appreciated I’ll be sure to use your link when I go for it

[@ks905kingsolomon4]

@@JaredHoyman last question is the r7 necessarily a bad choice to use at night? Is it that big a difference? Because the price is a pretty big difference

[@richardbance1048]

Hi Gerard .. what a great comparison video. We're always told aFF is better than a cropped sensor, but you've really convinced me of making an important choice. It's a case of what you like to photograph most. It would be great to have both, but with my budget I'm only allowed one. The grave yard with snow was a great choice of location. With the extra light the snow gives it worked so well. I did notice a very slight enhanced blow out on the R7 than on the R62, but that didn't detract from what you were demonstrating. The price difference between these cameras makes a big difference also. However, Canon, as always, has thrown into the mix the R8. Being FF that's very interesting addition. Can you advise on IBIS. Do you think that it is really necessary as it's not on the new R8? Cheers Richard.

[@JaredHoyman]

IBIS is great if you use it on a lens the doesn't have IS, but isn't that much more noticeable with a lens that has IS. If you use lenses that have IS then you probably will be fine with that compromise. That being said the IS on the R7 is excellent.

[@coleshill_production]

I thought bouquet was flowers haha

[@JaredHoyman]

😆 love it!

[@Kkkk-yz7dl]

For wedding photographer wich one better R or R7

[@JaredHoyman]

If you are looking for wedding and you want to stick around that $1500 range then go with the R6 refurbished around $1300. Better auto focus than the EOS R and a dual card slot for protection of card failure, which the eos r does not have. If you can spend a little more then go with the R6 II. But, if it's just photos and not video focused the R6 should be good enough.

[@Kkkk-yz7dl]

In lebanon R6 body price around 2600$ and R7 1600$ , so i can't cz my budget 1600$ " range", so if my old camer 5d iii and i but r7 good choice??

[@JaredHoyman]

@Kkkk-yz7dl for weddings I would do a camera that has dual card recording soni would go with the R7. R6 in the US is around $1200 and R6 II is $2500. If you can get a deal then go for R6 otherwise r7 is good.

[@Kkkk-yz7dl]

Ohh okk , Thank u soo much ❤🙏

[@Fred70115]

For me, too much about video, which I rarely use. I nature and landscape mostly. Also, a thousand bucks difference in price is a big factor. Coming from EOS T7i.

[@JaredHoyman]

A thousand dollars is a lot of money, but it is a HUGE difference going from a T7i crop to a professional full frame camera. I switched 12yrs ago from the t2i to the 6D and have had full frame in my bag since. It produces amazing images. That being said. My R7 produces great images too, just a different look.

[@dahaizang]

It's the pixel density that determines reach, not crop factor.

[@JaredHoyman]

Pixel density determines how much detail you can retain by cropping in. Sensor size determines reach based on the exact same lens on different sensor sizes. Crop sensor is 1.6x that of 35mm full frame regardless of pixels on the sensor.

[@dahaizang]

@@JaredHoyman I should correct myself: reach is determined solely by focal length, not crop factor. But given that, the usually higher pixel density of the crop sensor gives us more to see, as if to reach farther :)

[@KobraLink]

I choose, I choose....... both!

[@JaredHoyman]

Smart! Me too!

[@jondemetrius]

Yeah im sold on the r7 now

[@JaredHoyman]

You'll love it! Its a year later and I can't find any reason to sell it. It just works so well and makes an excellent video camera.

[@LimTong]

I came here to compare the performance of the cameras and really bummed that this is a 14:00 visual explanation of APS-C vs. full frame. I hope you'll consider making a video of how the sensors perform, build quality/size, photo/video usage and the pros and cons of the camera besides the crop factor of the lens.

[@JaredHoyman]

This is one video of many in a series I made on the cameras. You can go back and see each one of them and how they perform. The videos go back to June 2022.

[@LimTong]

I guess I'm just disappointed with the title. 'R7 vs r6mk2: Aps-c vs full frame crop ratio comparison' would make more sense. I kept waiting for more info like the title and description lead me to believe.

[@JaredHoyman]

@LimTong this is a lesson for me. I forget people come in for the first time and may not have seen the previous videos. I'll do my best to reference previous relevant videos in the beginning of my vids.

[@LimTong]

@@JaredHoyman thanks for being open to notes. It's what makes us all better at what we do. Keep on doing your thing!

[@JaredHoyman]

@LimTong When people are polite and respectful in their comments then I'm all good with that and all ears, but when people are rude, I will just delete your comments.

[@dubemfotografia]

Pelo que entendi é melhor usar 2020 ? E como tratar isso tudo depois ? Coloco um lut padrão e depois faço a cor ?

[@JaredHoyman]

I haven't used REC 2020, but I am curious now how it compares to REC 709.

[@grutiernomade]

bonjour pour avoir le meuilleur qualité d'images en video 4k 25 ou 50 le qu'elle es le meilleur r7 ou r6mark2 ?

[@JaredHoyman]

Very close but probably r6 2

[@mike.k]

Im thinking of R8 🤩 (just that tiny battery… 😖)

[@JaredHoyman]

That would stop me too.

[@mike.k]

@@JaredHoyman yea, lack of ibis and that lp-e17 battery 🪫🤣 might stop me 😱 however still thinking of R8 cuz it’s like compromise between R7 and R6 mark II… but crippled by that bloody battery omg 😭

[@JaredHoyman]

@Michael K the R7 does pack a ton of features. Or...find something to sell and get the R6 II. That's my logic when I want something.

[@mike.k]

@@JaredHoyman good point 👍🏻

[@majorpayne0195]

Like you, I'm also thinking about the R8 but the main downside for me is the lack of mechanical shutter.

[@buckeroonii]

subjects are always still LOL

[@skyhigh1154]

Can I also get a bag for free?? #thinktank 👜