Canon R8 Best Lightweight Wildlife Travel RF 100-400mm RF 2X Extender

  Рет қаралды 8,263

Richart Asia

Richart Asia

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 38
@fy7589
@fy7589 7 күн бұрын
I am finding it hard to believe these RF extenders would be this good. I've got the 1.4 extender and both 100-400 and 200-800 lenses, before the purchase, I was skeptical about the IQ but to my surprise, both these lenses performed spectacularly with the extender. But a lot of reviews don't mention this at all. The extenders won't really give you more reach if you're looking for the Same IQ you were getting without the extenders however, it'll make your subject fill the frame easier. So if you can take sharp photos at 100 feet without the extender, you're not gonna reach 140 feet to get the same image with the 1.4 extender, but rather you can still get the same IQ on a 100 feet subject and it'll be much bigger. So these are perfect for macro or closeup shots!
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia Күн бұрын
yup point of TC is not that you stand further than you should if used wisely it works as intended with good results
@fy7589
@fy7589 Күн бұрын
@@RichartAsia Great response bro. Many "pro photographers" on youtube deny this, glad you agreed.
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia Күн бұрын
hahaha I've been hacking TC usage for long time so well verse with TCs even Panasonic finally made their version II compatible with TC after me doing this on version I. The amount of brickbats I received after making this hack video kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5y8mJeLerepoZI
@fy7589
@fy7589 Күн бұрын
@@RichartAsia Thanks for sharing this, I also have the same "lens bags" which I ordered from amazon and apparently sent from China lol. We seem to have a lot of in common xD
@直直-n3k
@直直-n3k 8 ай бұрын
Very good idea and Thanks for sharing about this setup, have you try take the photo on R8 APS mode at 2x400mm ??
@nb1289
@nb1289 11 ай бұрын
Super video 😊
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 11 ай бұрын
Thanks for support!
@CheikoSairin
@CheikoSairin Жыл бұрын
Very nice set-up. Beautifulk sBig LIKE from me.
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia Жыл бұрын
thks bro
@alexandreaugusto890
@alexandreaugusto890 9 ай бұрын
Thanks for making it, there is no much more videos using this setup witch Im interesting on... a hug from Brazil
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 9 ай бұрын
Super thanks for support mate !
@andyp7787
@andyp7787 2 ай бұрын
Hello, thank you for your video. For the R7 and the RF 100-400, which extender (1.6 or 2.0 ) will give me better results for wildlife?
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 2 ай бұрын
I've tested both RF 2x & RF 1.4x. Get the 1.4x as the 2x is slower afc for Birds inf flight
@andyp7787
@andyp7787 2 ай бұрын
@@RichartAsia thanks! That’s what I’ll do!
@eddiehill6665
@eddiehill6665 Жыл бұрын
What would you recommend, I already have the R10 and the RF100-400. I can get a used RF600 that is like new for a good price, or should I get the RF1.4 extender?
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 11 ай бұрын
Rf 100-400mm if you need flexibility else 600mm is really good prime
@jcloiseau
@jcloiseau Жыл бұрын
I have the r8 and I'm getting the 100-400. Were all of your pics and video shot at max 800mm? Was the teleconverter absolutely indispensable ?
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia Жыл бұрын
yup luving this RF 2x way sharper than the previous EF 2x models
@eprohoda
@eprohoda Жыл бұрын
nice to meet youu~thank you! unusual ! 😯
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia Жыл бұрын
Thank you too
@DmitryBrodsky007
@DmitryBrodsky007 5 ай бұрын
Hi Richard, great video. I also have R8 and 100-400 and 800F11. I like 800F11 on R8 because it is full sensor focusing unlike on R5 (on R5 you get a square box in the middle). But I hate 6 meters MFD on 800F11. How is Image Quality on 100-400 with 2X?
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 5 ай бұрын
IQ is still good but slightly slower in tracking fast birds in flight due to high f-stop either way the RF 800 will still be sharpest at max length
@DmitryBrodsky007
@DmitryBrodsky007 5 ай бұрын
@@RichartAsia yep it (800F11) is pretty sharp but if you like to shoot small birds (like hummingbirds that I love shooting) you gotta be close to them and 800mm F11 just does not work as well as 100-400 or 100-500 or I suppose the new 200-800.
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 5 ай бұрын
@@DmitryBrodsky007 yup for small hovering birds or bees 100-400mm more suitable at close range it's still sharp with the RF 2x don't worry it's only at max that it's performing lesser to RF 800
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 5 ай бұрын
but I just switch to RF 1.4x it's a better option paring this to RF 100-400 & RF 800 worth a look at it
@DmitryBrodsky007
@DmitryBrodsky007 5 ай бұрын
@@RichartAsia One thing I sometimes do on 800F11 is I use 35mm macro tube between it and the camera. This lowers the MFD from 6 meters to 4.8 meters. It also slows the Autofocus somewhat, but 4.8 meters is better than 6 Meters.
@J-Young_photography
@J-Young_photography 3 ай бұрын
why not R7 + TC1.4X isn't that a better combo? with 896mm reach and faster f-stop f/11 at the end.
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 3 ай бұрын
@@J-Young_photography cropped sensor need to add x 1.6 to the f stop
@shutterbaephotos
@shutterbaephotos Жыл бұрын
Nice video! I have an canon eos r10 with the rf 100-400 lens and I find myself always needing a bit more range. Would you recommend I get the 1.4x or 2x teleconverter? I am torn between deciding on the two… please help with a recommendation 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia Жыл бұрын
Get the RF 1.4x TC it's almost 900mm FF due to sensor smaller can't go higher ISO for the 2x f16 that's too dark for the R10
@eddiehill6665
@eddiehill6665 Жыл бұрын
@@RichartAsia Thanks, I have this setup as well!
@АлександрСоловьев-д3ч
@АлександрСоловьев-д3ч 6 ай бұрын
Что у вас за сумка на пояс для фотоаппарата?
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia 6 ай бұрын
Mandarin Duck brand
@daveh.354
@daveh.354 Жыл бұрын
The R8 has a digital zoom also. Have you tried that with the 100-400mm lens? If so, what did you think of it?
@RichartAsia
@RichartAsia Жыл бұрын
Digital zoom can't beat optical zoom
@ChargedPulsar
@ChargedPulsar 11 ай бұрын
It doesn't have to beat it, there can still be a good fight.@@RichartAsia
Canon RF 100-400mm Review for Bird and Wildlife Photography
41:57
Duade Paton
Рет қаралды 379 М.
Is it WORTH the extra cost? Canon RF100-500 L vs RF 100-400 for Bird Photography
20:53
Fabian Fopp - Nature photography
Рет қаралды 78 М.
VAMPIRE DESTROYED GIRL???? 😱
00:56
INO
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma
00:14
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 78 МЛН
Will A Basketball Boat Hold My Weight?
00:30
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 117 МЛН
Wildlife Photography - How Good is the Canon RF 1.4x Extender?
12:35
KG's Photography
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Should you buy a Teleconverter?
11:17
Pangolin Wildlife Photography
Рет қаралды 34 М.
Canon RF100-300mm f2.8 Review for Wildlife:  Expensive 200-600mm
41:28
VAMPIRE DESTROYED GIRL???? 😱
00:56
INO
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН