Canon RF 14-35mm f/4: A Dream Wide Angle Lens?

[@ynkkruse]

I did the exact same thing, sold my 15-35 and picked up this gem. No regrets almost 2 years later!

[@CanonEurope]

3:02 ❤❤❤

[@TKNORTH]

Thank you 🙏🙏🙏

[@1RetroMetro1]

Been waiting for your video on this lens! Great stuff as always TK 🙏🏼🔥

[@ArnaudBltd]

Really interesting video and I love your film preset a lot ! I kept my EF 35mm f/1.4 ART and my EF 15mm f/2.4 because I struggle a little bit to find the best RF combination. Maybe wait for a future RF 35mm f/1.4 or lower and take the RF 10-20mm f/4.

[@mamoastudio]

Beautiful shots mate!

[@nirlevy1978]

I was very impressed by the video and it definitely helped me decide about this lens. Thank you very much. i want to ask question about your preset , the pictures are amazing and I wanted to know what prerset you used in the pictures. the look like fuji preset. i like it !!!

[@TKNORTH]

Thanks so much! I used my CineFilm Preset Pack in all the photos in this video! Cheers

[@TheBigBlueMarble]

Canon has established certain expectations for their L-glass and there are certain features the buyer expects. It is always their best build quality and it is designed for full frame cameras. There should be one additional feature of L lenses. They should be designed well enough that in-camera and post processing distortion correction should be mostly unnecessary and CERTAINLY not mandatory in-camera.

[@BleepingWorld]

Is this better then the 16mm 2.8?

[@고라니자라니-v3j]

what a great rivew! thank uou

[@scott_howes]

Lovely stuff mate

[@PhotographybySatesh]

I didn’t see any shots below 24mm…

[@mikedyson_]

Looks like a beast!

[@marceldeno1970]

the 14mm is perfect for x sports photography. At the edge of not bending bodies and just a bit wider than the useless 16 or 15 mm

[@noxus158]

Something that is bugging me is would it happen to be better than Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L?

[@MarcoSantiago-c4g]

IQ is a bit soft for me, sold my copy and bought a 15-35. Never been happier. 😊

[@nigelpamment3629]

There isn't a 2.8 version. You're talking about two completely different lenses, just in case you hadn't realised.

[@MarcoSantiago-c4g]

Yeah I know. Since most of the time 14-35 is being compared to the 15-35... so I went with the 15-35 instead of this one

[@niceyesplease]

Ok that is weird, many reviews actually state that the 14-35 is sharper than the 15-35.

[@TeeLsPeeLs]

I did the same, the 14-35mm had way too much distortion and vignetting, especially for interiors. I prefer straight lines.

[@TheBigBlueMarble]

A dream lens UNLESS you want to do any type of multi-exposure shots with the R5. You just can't.

[@chazM6116]

"Wide apertures for 'MORE' depth of field" ??????? you have that back-to-front its 'LESS' depth of field........