A Boeing 732 registered N9005U, attempted to takeoff from runway 09 at Philadelphia International Airport in Pennsylvania, on 19 july 1970, but it ended up on the ground, making this the first hull loss of of a 737.
Пікірлер: 76
@Fuff63Ай бұрын
Pilots only have seconds to make such decisions. It’s always easy in retrospect to critique. Blessings.
@davidquinn6161Ай бұрын
Critiquing is the whole point of accident investigations if there's any pilot error. Which there is about 75 % of the time.
@norbertdx29 күн бұрын
@@davidquinn6161 so you agree the pilot should have continued to climb and try a return landing?
@davidquinn616129 күн бұрын
That wasn't my point.Read my comment again. I gave no opinion about that particular incident and what the pilot should or should not have done. I'm not an expert in that area. Accident investigators ARE. My point was that since pilot error is a factor in about 75 % of aircraft incidents/accidents, critiquing is valid. It often leads to recommendations about how pilots should handle specific situations. It can, and has, lead to changes in emergency check lists. And changes in pilot training.
@hectorramos697528 күн бұрын
It seems the pilot decision was correct. If both engines didn't fail one does.
@LauraSchendel-ko1qk12 күн бұрын
This is a perfect example why flight attendants are trained to prepare for an unexpected emergency for EVERY take-off and EVERY landing. Why do passengers resent that? It boggles my mind!
@NobilangeloАй бұрын
Everyone lived. Lives are more important than machinery. What might have happened 'if' is only conjecture.
@janicerobinson619811 күн бұрын
What a smart Captain. Thank God for him. 😊
@SevereWeatherCenter28 күн бұрын
Joseph Lubozynski passed away on New Year’s Eve in 2010. He retired from United Airlines in 1983.
@johnkern70757 күн бұрын
R.I.P.
@SinergiaAlUnisonoАй бұрын
with so few seconds left to take the correct action... a voice alert stating "left turbine failing", or both or right one only, etc might come in handy instead of having to rely upon gathering all the information necessary when you are in a hurry in such a stressful situation ...
@SinergiaAlUnisonoАй бұрын
and / or the computer saying... statistical data recommends '... continue to take off', so as to take a bit of responsibility off from the pilots shoulders when you are too close to the ground and no time left almost... (if they have more time and or altitude they can decide to override the computer if they knew better...)
@bennyF52Ай бұрын
Guys….. 1970. No audible warnings on commercial jet aircraft. Certainly no computer systems
@lorig70775 күн бұрын
As long as no-one was hurt everything else is secondary. You have seconds to react. You don't have all the information you need. The pilot did what he had to work with and good job.
@paulw4310Ай бұрын
Working with what he believed he had (2 failed engines), I can't fault the captain's decision to put it back down. There was, however, a breakdown of SOPs. When the left engine failed, the captain was the pilot monitoring. Since they were past V1 (and V2) the PF should have maintained directional control and climbed out no slower than V2 and the captain (PM) should've assessed the problem and began to work it at a safe altitude. That didn't happen, however, and thankfully there was no fire and no fatalities. There are a lot of airports where that wouldn't have been the outcome. PS As an airline pilot, I had my one and only engine failure (a catastrophic failure) on take while departing KPHL. (RWY 27L)
@Eric_20015 күн бұрын
Thanks for actually showing simulations of the incidents. Most other channels don’t.
@uberlpn26 күн бұрын
If I was on that flight I would consider that crew hero's, there was not time to figure out the entire situation, so give them a break ffs.......everyone lived everyone went home!!! Sometimes thinking out of the box and using instincts is the better way!
@KampalaMike24 күн бұрын
I'm very happy you're alive to tell the story
@Foxstang4lifeАй бұрын
You all do an awesome job at recreating and the visuals are top notch !! This has become one of my top favorite channels ✨️✨️👍👍
@Robert-rv3zmАй бұрын
One minute detail is in error. The video indicates the year is 1970 but, UAL didn’t adopt the Saul Bass livery until 1974. It’s okay though.
@robm3074Ай бұрын
I was just about ready to make a comment on that when I read your statement. I think Saul Bass was starting to be applied in 1974
@JustARandomBlueE25 күн бұрын
It is possible that the aircraft in the reconstruction did not have the livery used by the accident aircraft, they used the “Saul Bass” livery instead as a replacement for the “Stars and Bars” livery
@Robert-rv3zm5 күн бұрын
@@JustARandomBlueE2 You’re probably right
@walkerpanteraАй бұрын
you make great videos.
@johnkern70757 күн бұрын
Look at that Ford Maverick!
@SAT111973Ай бұрын
Excellent video as always. However the scheme in 1970 for United was blue and red, maybe the Friendship livery? The one used in video was introduced in the latter half of the 70’s.
@jamesx4952Ай бұрын
This gives a striking resemblance to U.S airways flight that basically crashed the same way in Philadelphia In March 13 2014
@thewatcher5271Ай бұрын
This Reminded Me Of The Move, 'Fate Is The Hunter' From 1964. Thank You. (Like #92)
@jkryansparkАй бұрын
I didn't think anybody else had seen that movie. The pier was supposed to be taken away, but the contractors went on a hunting trip. Thus the pier caused a fatal air crash. Decent film.
@nommadd5758Ай бұрын
Excellent video! Nice work!
@gabrielhalston6726Ай бұрын
The particular United "Tulip" livery design on this aircraft in this video is incorrect for the time period of 1970. In 1970, United was still using their iconic "Friendship" livery, not this one.
@johnoconnor635622 күн бұрын
As United Airlines did not yet have the tulip logo in 1970, this video must have been shot at least 4 or more years later. United's 1970 logo was the red, White & blue 4 star friendship logo.
@WilliamMurphy-uv9pm9 күн бұрын
This video was a computer simulation and often many of the details will not match reality.
@mgaeeeee915012 күн бұрын
What simulator are you using?
@PeterFruits-hm8rcАй бұрын
This aircraft is 63 years old so if the video was uploaded one day ago ?? Where did you get the video from
@kikastraАй бұрын
What are those cables that connect from the fuselage and tailfin on those old 737s?
@rnich56Ай бұрын
HF radio antenna
@kikastraАй бұрын
@@rnich56 cool, makes sense now, thanks, 👍
@lrx544 күн бұрын
No aviation experience, but it might be time to install cameras so pilots can see the engines and wings.
@raymondclark17859 сағат бұрын
In 1970 we didn't have cameras on our cars either. On older aircraft which engine would be called out by the engineer but that position was cut to save cost 😢
@georgeconway4360Ай бұрын
My understanding is the Captain was fired but eventually regained his job in arbitration.
@charlesadams41Ай бұрын
From what I've seen, he retired as a Captain in 1983. He was also a WW2 pilot in the China-India-Burma campaign (resupply missions).
@georgeconway4360Ай бұрын
@@charlesadams41 He was also at United as a result of the merger with Capital.
@deepthinker99928 күн бұрын
Good Information.
@n.v.1258Ай бұрын
You can hear the GPWS warning in your simulation, but this wasn't active until late 1974. They wouldn't have the whop whop pull-up notice. 🤔
@WilliamMurphy-uv9pmАй бұрын
This happened 54cyears ago and the title of the video makes it seem like NOW. Despicable click bait.
@cll1639Ай бұрын
You sound like someone who hates flowers, fresh air and little children. And it's BAIT.
@mihaischitcu1917Күн бұрын
Yup, crashes from the 70s are sooo boring 💤
@danlowe8684Ай бұрын
So, if you were certified to fly this 737 you are certified to fly the current models without further training?
@deepthinker99928 күн бұрын
Boeing tried that with the 737 MAX with horrible results and much loss of life.
@CHULAIa4-666727 күн бұрын
United didn’t have the large titles in 1970.
@grahamcracker65916 сағат бұрын
this very scare, my cat sad
@lulubells9302 күн бұрын
Boeing blames everything on others!!!
@user-wd3fn9qv6c20 күн бұрын
Go baby
@itjustlookslikethisАй бұрын
United Airlines flight 611 crashes on takeoff at Philadelphia Airport. There, I corrected it for you.
@sendink9140Ай бұрын
This is either AI or ancient because United Airlines do not fly 737s anymore plus these are their old colors from over a decade ago.
@ccwright24Ай бұрын
It looked like it happened in the 70’s
@josemiranda1241Ай бұрын
@@ccwright24 1970
@ernestgalvan903729 күн бұрын
The opening captions CLEARLY state “1970”…
@rodbutler4054Ай бұрын
Old engines.
@southpakrulesАй бұрын
128
@jmfs8738Ай бұрын
Mentour Pilot will give way more reliable info and realistic graphics from a current training pilot, y’all!
@kevinkennard181028 күн бұрын
Fucking simulator
@chasallallbright487717 күн бұрын
United has advertised they wish to hire black female pilots,not the best pilots they can find regardless of race creed color ect. I will not fly on united!!!
@mihaischitcu1917Күн бұрын
Oh don't worry, you'll be fine. God has a strange sense of humor.
@thomasclinton5875Ай бұрын
Fake video. Why should I believe anything
@WilliamMurphy-uv9pm9 күн бұрын
You should not believe everything you see or hear. But is was likely a "reasonable" replay of what happened using a computerized flight simulator. In the 1970s nobody had cell phones with cameras in them. Thus real videos of such dramatic events are usually not available.
@annsheridan12Ай бұрын
DEI ?
@ssbohio29 күн бұрын
In what way? Was there DEI in 1970 when this accident occurred?
@annsheridan1229 күн бұрын
@@ssbohio obviously it’s a more recent failure.
@ssbohio29 күн бұрын
@@annsheridan12 I guess I'm not seeing what role you're thinking DEI played in this crash. That's what's confusing me. Sorry if I'm not picking up on your meaning.
@annsheridan1229 күн бұрын
@@ssbohio I reacted before the date was announced, I was wrong. However it is a serious issue today.
@WilliamMurphy-uv9pm9 күн бұрын
Yeah, DEI made the engine fail. Panic likely made the pilot fail. Mistakes are often gender- neutral.