Casio g-shock MTG B1000 in 2024! Is it still the best MTG to date?

Hi, I'm an independent creator providing honest, unbiased reviews by purchasing products myself. My channel shares genuine insights on product pros and cons, without sponsorships or paid promotions. I focus on value for money, conducting thorough research before any purchase to ensure high standards. Creating content requires significant time and effort, with the support of my partner. If you find my content valuable, you can donate here. I'm also open to reviewing products that align with my interests and standards. Thank you for your support!
www.buymeacoffee.com/wismods

[@ianmaw66]

Having owned the B1000, B2000 and B3000 I don't agree, with respect. The B2000 is in my opinion. I think the finishing and the module is the best. I have a lovely B3000 and it is really thin but I am not sure the finishing is as good as the B2000 and when changing setting hands etc. move much slower (not that this is a practical issue). Thanks for the video.

[@wismods]

Thanks for your comment. I believe a portion of our preference is based on subjective taste, which is different per individual. So the round vs. octagonal shape may be a matter of individual preference, but do you think the dial, handset, and indexes are of higher quality on the b2000? Thanks again for the engagement!

[@tangar-jz3xd]

Thank you for the review. However, let me disagree. 10:39 Seeing all three of them side by side, I would confidently say all three model are of the same quality. It is only a matter of design preference. The B3000 was surprisingly manageable in size, which would go as a relatively normal watch size. Thanks

[@wismods]

@tangar-jz3xd of course, you may disagree as much as you like. My argument is that the build quality is better on the B1000 compared to the other two. These are steel g-shocks, so ruggedness and robustness should be expected. But within that rugedness, out of the 3, the B1000 and B2000 have stronger built bracelets, and the detail work on the dial is more demanding on the B1000 and B2000. The b3000 is the least decorated and detailed, plain dial and indexes. So I am not claiming anything in regard to taste, that is entirely subjective. But in terms of quality and workmanship required, the ranking is 1. B1000, 2. B2000, AND 3. B3000. Please keep in mind videos and photos do not do these watches justice. The difference in quality is way more visible when actually holding the watches and inspecting them in hand. What I am trying to say with this review is that I am disappointed to see my favorite brand decline in quality and design rather than improving on their next generations of watches. Thank you for taking the time to engage

[@tangar-jz3xd]

​@@wismods you are welcome, nonetheless; for those who are going to chose to buy one of the I still strongly say that the three models are build with the same mechinary and technic as equel in case and dial finishing. if anything the bracelet for B3000 feels moere fitting to its case design. for those how have sharp sight I would say some colour like gold on the dial secially on the small hands would feel and look of a cheaper quality in compare with other color like red, white or black. that is my exprience. it defer from one person to other.